Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This Content Downloaded From 64.28.140.228 On Fri, 04 Mar 2022 19:36:53 UTC
This Content Downloaded From 64.28.140.228 On Fri, 04 Mar 2022 19:36:53 UTC
Working
Author(s): Daniel J. Crowley
Source: Western Folklore , Summer - Autumn, 1999, Vol. 58, No. 3/4, Studies of
Carnival in Memory of Daniel J. Crowley (Summer - Autumn, 1999), pp. 213-222
Published by: Western States Folklore Society
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Western States Folklore Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Western Folklore
My critic was right in pointing out that theory has not been my forte
during my professional career now stretching back over four decades. Not
only am I a "self-confessed Boasian particularist"-there are not too many
alive who can say that-chary of supracultural generalizations, but far
worse, I am much too much in love with my field data for its own sake to
care too much what it all might MEAN - if anything. This fascination with
the cultural variety in our world is quite simply "the fire in my furnace,"
and easier to understand when you realize that I was born in that doyen of
American cities, Peoria, Illinois, the grandchild of Irish and Alsatian-
French migrants, son of a surprisingly successful plumbing contractor, a
whitecollar kid in the quintessential bluecollar town. Having access to The
National Geographic and a public library, I soon realized that there had to
be better places for me than Peoria, and my subsequent career can be seen
as a long hard struggle to get away from there and to stay away. This
explains my exotic Trinidadian East Indian wife, the focus on such
In his 1968 study of Gargantua and Pantagruel (Rabelais and His Wor
Bakhtin pointed out the truly subversive nature of festivals in general
Carnival in particular, even those sponsored and organized by the p
cal and religious authorities. Even more important, his "dialogism"
a case that all interactional speech, i.e. conversation, carries comp
future who might care about the Carnival for itself, and how i
it will be then-and maybe even what it all might mean. In the
this old man is content to keep collecting and analyzing his dat
can, in its own terms, because it is valuable in itself, and also t
life-far better indeed than actually working for a living.
I thank you for this opportunity to explain myself, to justify
make a case for continued observation, and the collection an
field data. I also managed to read a paper about festival wi
tioning liminality and Victor Turner.
Notes
Works Cited
Abrahams, Roger D. 1989. Bakhtin, the Critics, and Folklore. Journal of American
Folklore 102: 202-206.
Agnew, Jean-Christophe. 1985. The Market and the Theater in Anglo-American
Thought, 1550-1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984 [1968]. Rabelais and His World. Translated by H6l8ne Iswol-
sky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Breen, Henry Hegart. 1844. St. Lucia: Historical, Statistical, and Descriptive. Lon-
don: Brown, Greeen and Longmans.
Bristol, Michael D. 1985. Carnival and Theater: Plebeian Culture and the Structure of
Authority in Renaissance England. New York: Methuen.
Carmichael, Gertrude. 1961. The History of the West Indian Islands of Trinidad and
Tobago, 1498-1900. London: A. Redman.