Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SBMWSM2016
SBMWSM2016
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT
MANUAL
Edition No.: 3
Revision Date: December 2016
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL
(PART I)
SH I PB O A R D
M A N A G EM E N T M A N U A L
PA R T I
EDITION NO. 3
31 January 2006
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
CONTENTS Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I
Page -1- Approved by : Directors
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section pages no.
(!) TABLE OF CONTENTS--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
ND
FOREWORD TO 3 EDITION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
SIGNATURE CARD ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
(!) (!) REVISION SHEET ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
(!) (!) MANAGEMENT REVIEW ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1
(!)
SECTION 1.0 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
1.1 INTRODUCTION TO QUALITY ASSURANCE IN SHIP MANAGEMENT--------------------- 2
1.2 HEALTH & SAFETY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
1.3 CONSERVATION & PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT --------------------------------- 4
1.4 DRUG & ALCOHOL POLICY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
1.5 MINIMISING PROCESS LOSS AND IMPROVEMENT OF LOSS CONTROL --------------- 5
1.6 MANDATORY REGULATIONS & LAWS ------------------------------------------------------------- 5
SECTION 2 OVERVIEW OF DOCUMENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
2.1 OVERVIEW OF SHIP AND OFFICE DOCUMENTS ----------------------------------------------- 1
2.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
2.3 APPROVAL, ISSUANCE, REVISIONS AND AMENDEMENTS --------------------------------- 1
2.4 DOCUMENT RETENTION PERIOD ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
2.5 BASIS FOR WALLEM SEP/ ISM/ SMS SYSTEMS & DOCUMENTATION ------------------- 2
2.6 SHIPBOARD DOCUMENT CONTROL AND DISTRIBUTION ----------------------------------- 3
2.7 COMPANY STATIONERY -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6
2.8 FILING SYSTEM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6
2.9 DOCUMENTATION SYSTEM --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7
2.9.1 MASTER'S FILING SYSTEM ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7
2.9.2 CHIEF ENGINEER'S FILING SYSTEM---------------------------------------------------------------- 9
SECTION 3 ADMINISTRATION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
3.1 DEFINITIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1
SECTION 4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
4.1 ORGANISATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
(!) 4.2 DESCRIPTION OF OFFICE AND SHIP PERSONNEL RESPONSIBILITIES AS
APPLICABLE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2
4.3. SHIPS ORGANIZATION – STANDARD MANNING ------------------------------------------------ 7
4.3.1 SHIPS ORGANIZATION - FOR JOB DESCRIPTIONS -------------------------------------------- 8
4.4 MASTER DELEGATION OF MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
4.5 JOB DESCRIPTIONS /RESPONSIBILITIES/DUTIES ------------------------------------------- 10
4.5.1 JOB TITLE MASTER ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10
4.5.2. INTERRELATIONS (SHIP / SHORE) I.E. MASTER WITH OTHERS ------------------------ 13
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
CONTENTS Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I Page -2- Approved by : Directors
ND
FOREWORD TO 3 EDITION
WALLEM’s initial SEP Audit for SEP was carried out in February 1992.At that time we had Manuals such as Company
Regulations, Instructions to Masters and Chief Engineers, Circulars., etc. but not the Shipboard Management Manual.
The Shipboard Management Manual Part I&II were issued on 31-3-93 (1st Edition); superseding the mentioned
Regulations and Instruction Manuals, and eventually having 9 revisions. This became the 2nd Edition of SBM Part I.
Further revisions will be indicated on the right side of the header. Amendments to pages indicated by (!) alongside. The
SBM Part II has been made into another file which along with the new Part III would make a presentable set of Manuals.
The Part II now includes the contents of the previous Circulars relevant to the SEP. Circulars relevant to Crewing and
Personnel have been shifted to “ General Letters” section in SMS Documentation DVD Qtr ….
& Safety / Insurance. As both SBM Parts I and II have considerable revisions they should both be read again.
This book is the property of WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD, HONG KONG (WSM). Its contents
are confidential and are not to be communicated or shown to persons outside the Company's employ.
DISTRIBUTION: -
The Master will hold one copy as controlled copy, i.e the revision sheet is to be signed by Master.
2CDs - 1 for Chief Engineer & 1 for Chief Officer. The Chief Officer is responsible for maintaining the
soft copy onboard computers for crew members perusal.
IMPORTANT NOTE: -
Part I & II are standard for all vessels
SIGNATURE CARD
(Master's Copy Only)
All Officers joining the ship must indicate that they have read and understood the contents of this manual
by, signing below.
DATE NAME & RANK SIGNATURE DATE NAME & RANK SIGNATURE
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SIGNATURE CARD Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Page -2- Rev.No. / Date : May 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
SIGNATURE CARD
(Master's Copy Only)
All Officers joining the ship must indicate that they have read and understood the contents of this manual
by signing below.
DATE NAME & RANK SIGNATURE DATE NAME & RANK SIGNATURE
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
REVISION SHEET Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I
Page -1- Approved by : Managing Director
REVISION SHEET
When it becomes necessary to revise contents of this manual, the issue of a new page(s) in the relevant
section will be made. Amendments will be highlighted by (!) ; New Insertion will be highlighted (!!).
These revised pages will bear a revision number and date and will be listed on this page which will be
new every time there is an amendment. Master/Chief Engineer is to initial below after insertion into the
controlled copy held by them.
REVISED PAGES(S) MASTER/ REVISED MASTER/
CHIEF PAGES(S) CHIEF
ENGINEER ENGINEER
NO DATE INITIALS NO DATE INITIALS
Complete SBM Parts I&II Section 8 : Page 1,2,3,4
Revised and Edition No.3 Jan 06 Section 9 : Page 1 Jan 10
Section 10 : Page 5
Is the successor. Section 11 : Page 2,3,4
Table of contents Section 14 : Page 4, 7
Revision sheet Table of contents : Pg. 1-8
Section 1: Page 4, 5 Contents : Pg. 12 & 13 Jun 10
Section 2: Page 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, Section 4 : Pg. 1, 6-9, 16, 19,
22 & 23
Section 3: Page 1,2, 3 Section 5 : Pg. 11,13,15-17
Section 4: Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Section 8 : Pg. 4
7 ,8, 9, 11,13, 16, 17, 18, 19, Section 14 : Pg. 9 & 10
21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31, Aug 06
33, 36, 37, 58, 59 Changed wording from “SBM
III” or “General Letters” to Jan 11
Section 5 : Page 1, 2, 11, 12, “ship type specific operation”
13, 14, 15, 16 or “SMS Documentation DVD”
Section 7 : Page 6 as applicable.
Section 8 : Page 1,2, 3, 4 Contents : All
Section 9 : Page 1 Section 2: Pg. 7 Mar 11
Section 10 : Page 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 Section 3: Pg. 3-5
Section 11: Page 2, 4 Section 4: Pg. 1, 12
Section 12 : Page 1, 2 Section 5: All
Section 13 : Page 1, 2 Section 7: All
Section 14 : Page 1, 4, 12 Section 4: Pg 1 May 11
Section 15 : Page 1 Section 4 : Pg 1 Oct 11
Section 16: Page 1, 3
Section 4 : Page 1 Jan 07 Content : 1-9,13 & 14 Jan 12
Section 1: Pg 5
Table of contents : Page 1-8 Section 3: Pg 3
Contents : Page 9 Section 4: Pg1,4,13-14, 21 & 58
Revision sheet Section 5: Pg 3, 4 & 6
Management Review
Section 2: Page 1-8 Section 8: Pg 4
Section 4: Page 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, Section 9: Pg 1
7 ,8, 9, 11,13, 15, 16, 17, 18, Section 10: Pg1 & 5
22, 31, 32, 33, 34, 41, 49, 59 Jun 07 Section 11: Pg2 & 6
Section 5 : Page 1, 2, 11, 12, Section 12: Pg 1-2, 4-5
15, 16 Section 14: Pg 2-3,5-6 & 10
Section 6 : Page 1
Section 7 : Page 2 Revision Sheets: Pg. 13
Section 8 : Page 1, 2, 3, 4 Section 4 : Pg 1 Aug 12
Section 9 : Page 1 Contents : Pg 1-9, 13, 14
Section 10 : Page 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 Section 1 : Pg 5
Section 11: Page 2, 4 Section 2 : Pg 1, 3 Feb 13
Section 12 : Page 2, 3 Section 4 : Pg 1, 5, 16, 19, 22
Section 14 : Page 1, 2,3,13
Section 16: Page 1, 3 Section 5 : Pg 1-9, 13
Section 4 : Page 6 Dec 07 Section 6 : All
Section 2 : Page 8,9 Oct 08 Section 7 : All
Section 4 : Page 1,11 Section 8 : Pg 2
Section 5 : Page 2,3,6, Section 9 : All
15&16 Section 10 : Pg 3
Section 10 : Page 6 Section 14: All
Section 11 : Page 5 Section 16: Pg 3, 4
Section 1 : Page 1&5 Apr 09 Contents : Pg. 1-9 & 13 May 13
(ClassNK Audit) Section 1 : Pg. 5
Content : Page 9 Section 4 : Pg. 1
Section 2 : Page 3 Aug 09 Section 7 : Pg. 35
Contents : Page 1-8,12-13 Section 1 : Pg. 1 Jul 2013
Section 1 : Page 4,5 Jan 10 Section 4 : Pg. 1
Section 2 : Page 1,3,4,5,7,8 &9 Contents : Pg. 1-9 & 13
Section 4 : Page 1,4,5,11,
12,13,15, 19,22,28,29, 33,58,59 Section 4 : Pg. 1 Nov 2013
Section 5 : Page Section 11: Pg. 1
6,7,11,12,13,15 Section 14 : Pg. 3
Section 6 : Page 1 Section 16 : Pg. 4
Section 7 : Page 4
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
REVISION SHEET Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I
Page -2- Approved by : Directors
Table of Contents : Pg 4
Revision Sheet : Pg. 2 Mar 2015
Section 7 : Pg. 1
MANAGEMENT REVIEW
03/93
ALL Office reorganisation and ISMA Audit PT
(1st Edition)
ALL 12/94 As per Revision Sheets PT
ALL 12/95 Manual Over – full PT
1&4 1/96 Office Reorganisation , revised sec. 1 & 4 AKA
ALL 01/10 All Sections reviewed. Revisions as per revision sheet DSH, SR
ALL 01/12 All sections reviewed. Revisions as per revision sheet DSH/SR
ALL 02/13 All Sections reviewed, Revisions as per revision sheet VMS/SR
ALL
03/13 All Sections reviewed, Revisions as per revision sheet VMS/SR
ALL 05 & 12/14 All Sections reviewed, Revisions as per revision sheet VMS/SR/PNS/JCTY
This is a quality review of the system and/or procedures on a yearly basis to consider the need for system
improvement. When these reviews are done, comments from the Masters’ review will also be taken into account.
SECTION 1
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jul 2013
MANUAL- PART I
Page -1- Approved by : Managing Director
In doing so, we will strive to adhere to the following principles, in all our activities:
Wallem will employ systems and procedures specifically designed to prevent activities and/or conditions
that pose a threat to Health, Safety or the Environment. We will minimize risk and protect our employees and
the communities in which we operate, by employing safe technologies and operating procedures, and being
prepared for emergencies.
In doing so, Wallem is determined to prevent all injuries on board & ashore, while maintaining high
standards of environment protection.
TRUE NORTH
Full Ahead The Wallem Way
Managing Director
WALLEM
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION
Wallem objective is dedicated to providing the customer with safe, economical and
environmentally sounds services, which meet the agreed specifications for quality management.
The performance of this objective requires functional expertise expressed through sound, timely
and cost effective execution and co-ordinated team work. The characteristics of this approach will
be a meticulous regard for safety and the environment, thorough professionalism and
performance, to minimise Process Loss and continuously improve Loss Control measures, with
an aim to achieve zero failure.
The achievement of this objective requires active participation of all members of the WALLEM
team in a continuous process of measurable quality improvement at all points in its operational
chain.
This Manual details the policies & measures adopted by the Company for safe and efficient
operation of vessels under its management and control. Attention of all persons whether
employed ashore or on board vessels is drawn to these policies to which they must abide and be
guided by. Suitable references have been made to other documents where individual policy or
subject matter has been described in more detail.
The cornerstones of good management in any business are commitment from the top and
effective Line Management. The Management of WALLEM places great importance on the safety
of their personnel, those who may be affected by the Company's activities, ships and cargo.
Notwithstanding this, all WALLEM employees both ashore and afloat have a shared responsibility
to maintain high standards of Safety, Health and Environmental protection and they should bring
any issues causing concern to the immediate attention of the person they are responsible to. If
any ship's personnel remain dissatisfied with the response received, they should bring the matter
to the Master's attention who may in turn refer to the 'Designated Person Ashore'. The ultimate
responsibility for safety rests with our Managing Director, who has demonstrated his commitment
by issuing WALLEM Objectives & Policies, a copy of which is attached to the beginning of this
section.
SECTION 1
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I
Page -3- Approved by : Managing Director
It is the Policy of the Board of Directors of WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD, HONG KONG
that in all its activities it will take account of the need to: -
i) Provide safe and healthy working conditions for all persons connected with WALLEM
managed vessels and to ensure that their action will not adversely affect the health and
safety of others.
ii) Identify the risks to health and safety involved with its business activities and the
necessary precautions required.
iii) Provide all its employees with information, equipment and training necessary for them to
carry out their work safely.
iv) Ensure that means are provided for consultation between WALLEM and ship's personnel,
on health and safety matters.
WALLEM considers that accidents to personnel and property can be prevented if proper thought
is given to the risks involved in the work and appropriate precautions taken.
The Managing Director, along with the DPA is responsible for the implementation and
co-ordination of this Policy. Each Master is responsible for implementing this Policy on board his
ship and ensures compliance by the ship's personnel.
While the overall responsibility for Safety, Health and Protection of the Environment rests with the
highest level of WALLEM management ashore and with Masters at sea, it is the duty of all
employees to act responsibly and support the above objectives to prevent injury to themselves,
their colleagues and damage to their ships and environment.
SECTION 1
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2010
MANUAL- PART I
Page -4- Approved by : Managing Director
The following amplifies the Company's Policy Statement with respect to the protection of the
Environment: -
ii) The Company supports the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from
Ships (MARPOL). Additional emphasis given by ensuring the following:
a) Appropriate operating practices and training in respect to handling garbage including
cargo residue and plastics.
b) Appropriate operating practices and training in respect to handling engine room bilge
water and sludge.
iii) Within the limitations of economic operation, WALLEM will endeavour to maintain a
leading position in the development of anti pollution measures, compatible with the best
safety and operating policies. However, maintenance and spares for environmental
protection machinery and equipment will always receive priority and funding.
iv) All employees have an obligation to ensure that they are fully aware of the impact of their
activities on the environment and that every effort is made to avoid pollution from
WALLEM ships.
v) WALLEM will devote time and effort in developing this Policy and will provide such
instruction, information and supervision as is necessary.
vi) The Company supports the IMO Guidelines for the control and management of ships'
ballast water to minimize the transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens
It is the Policy of WALLEM to maintain a safe and healthy working environment free from the use
of drugs and unauthorised alcohol i.e. zero tolerance for any alcohol beside beer under controlled
conditions.
Unlawful possession, consumption, distribution or sale of drugs by any WALLEM employee
warrants instant dismissal and will render the person liable for legal proceedings.
Any person found to be under the influence of alcohol (BAC >0.04%) at any time will be
suspended and will be subjected to harsh disciplinary action including dismissal.
SECTION 1
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2013
MANUAL- PART I
Page -5- Approved by : Managing Director
The foregoing Principles are deemed to be the principles under which the Objectives and Policies
of WALLEM are built upon. The definitions in the ensuing paragraphs of “Process Loss” and
“ Loss Control “ which are to be minimised and continuously improved respectively forms the
basis of our policy and structures the Management System.
WALLEM recognises that any initiative or effort undertaken to enhance safety will be a success
when it is based on understanding of the role of human factors and devotion of time and effort to
training.
The following amplifies the Company's policy with respect to mandatory regulations & laws: -
All rules regulations and National Legislation’s pertaining to vessel's Flag State will be strictly
followed. All ships shall be operated according to applicable IMO conventions, rules,
regulations & latest amendments as applicable. The list below are the major IMO conventions
and regulations that will be complied with by the vessel: -
The booklet included in the inside cover of this manual gives the issue and latest revision date of
various documents. When revisions are effected and the overview page has not been revised,
then the date is to be entered by the holder of the manual against the relevant document.
This booklet contains an overview of documents (related to Company's Quality System) to assist
the reader in identifying where information on organization, responsibilities, procedures, etc. for
safe and efficient management of vessels may be found.
The terms of reference for this manual are Latest issues / Editions of
ISO 9001:2008
ISO 14001:2004
OHSAS 18001:2007
ISM Code
Flag State Rules – Applicable interpretations
MLC 2006
2.5 BASIS FOR WALLEM SEP/ ISM/ SMS SYSTEMS & DOCUMENTATION
Local StateAuthorities
Terminals
Superintendent Reports
E-mails from office on
accident / incidents in the
Class - Emergency fleet.
Response Casualty Reports
Services Accident Statistics
Verification Reports
Reporting & Review
Procedures
Report forms
SECTION 2
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
OVERVIEW OF SHIP AND Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHORE DOCUMENTS Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -3-
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL PARTS 1 + 2 CDs Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
I& II
MAJOR CASUALITY CONTINGENCY MANUAL 1+ 2 CDs Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
SOPEP / VESSEL RESPONSE PLAN 1 BRIDGE
FAMILIARISATION BOOKLETS 1/Rank ALL RANKS
SAFETY MANUAL 1 + 2 CDs Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
BRIDGE PROCEDURES MANUAL 1 + 2 CDs Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
P&I CLUB HANDBOOK FOR CURRENT YEAR 1 CAPT
TANKER OPERATIONS MANUAL 1 + 2 CDs Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
GAS TANKER OPERATIONS MANUAL 1 + 2 CDs Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
CHEMICAL TANKER OPERATIONS MANUAL 1 + 2 CDs Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
BULK CARRIER MANUAL 1 + 2 CDs Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
CONTAINER OPERATION MANUAL 1 + 2 CDs Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
PCC / PCTC OPERATION MANUAL 1 + 2 CDs Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
BULK CARRIER INSPECTION/GENERAL 1 + 2 CDs Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
NOTES - for bulk carrier only
REEFER MANUAL 1 + 2 CDs Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
HSE MANUAL 1 + 2 CDs
Capt hard copy, C/E (1 CD) & C/O (1CD)
All documents listed are available to the Ships Complement who are obliged to read and familiarise
themselves to the contents. Please request the Master for a copy to read.
A Copy of this Document Distribution List is to be displayed on the Notice Board.
____________________________
Master
SECTION 2
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
OVERVIEW OF SHIP AND Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHORE DOCUMENTS Rev.No. / Date : June 2007
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -6-
Company stationery is to be used and forwarded in compliance with the instructions in the
stationery list. Stocks on board are to be checked against issue / revision dates in company
stationery list, which is updated periodically. Superseded stationery must be destroyed and/
or used as scrap paper.
Ship’s staff using computers to generate company forms are to ensure their copy is “word-
for-word”
with no additions or deletions from the original. Furthermore, below the form identifier
number, the words “Format True Copy” must be inserted.
Many of the company forms, for example Monthly deck abstract, Monthly Engine abstract etc
are available as attachments in the SMMS system. For vessels fitted with SMMS Planned
maintenance system, the forms available in the SMMS are to be used. Printout of the form
filled in the SMMS can then be taken and filed as applicable.
Masters and Chief Engineers are to arrange and maintain their filing systems in accordance
with Company instructions. Any additional files necessitated for any reason should be
included in the filing system index. Masters and Chief Engineers are to ensure that proper
storage of old correspondence and documents is satisfactory. If volume of correspondence/
documents is becoming unmanageable due to shortage of storage spaces, the office is to be
requested for disposal instructions.
SECTION 2
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
OVERVIEW OF SHIP AND Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHORE DOCUMENTS Rev. Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page -7-
ON BRIDGE
33) Monthly Deck Abstracts
34) Charterer’s Deck Abstracts
35) Sickness Report
36) Crew List & Crew Vaccination List
37) Port Information File
SECTION 2
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
OVERVIEW OF SHIP AND Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHORE DOCUMENTS Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2010
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -8-
Note The above mentioned are the standard filing system to be maintained on board all the vessels,
and additional complementary files as required or to meet vessel specific requirements should
be maintained and a list of such additional files to be included in the Masters Handing over notes.
Master has authority to change the location of file from the officer designated for the file except for
File 43 and 44.
SECTION 2
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
OVERVIEW OF SHIP AND Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHORE DOCUMENTS Rev.No. / Date : May 2015
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -9-
Note The above mentioned are the standard filing system to be maintained on board all the vessels, and
additional complementary files as required or to meet vessel specific requirements should be
maintained and a list of such additional files to be included in the Chief Engineers handing over notes.
All drawings and instruction books should be checked against the shipyard or master list in order to
make sure that all are available onboard.
All certificate’s validity should be checked against the list in SMMS and the Class Listing sent
from the office every two months
SECTION 3
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
ADMINISTRATION Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL- PART I
Page -1- Approved by : Managing Director
SECTION 3 ADMINISTRATION
3.1 DEFINITIONS
"Senior Officers" These include: Masters, Chief Engineers, Chief Officers and
Second Engineer Officers.
"National Legislation" All relevant regulations of the Flag State of the ship and of
States and ports visited by the ship.
“Critical Equipment and Are those where sudden loss of functional capability or where
failure
“Critical Operations and Are those which have a significant risk of causing major injuries or
Conditions” illness to people, or damage to ship, cargo, other property and/or
the environment.
“Document Control” Means the control in place to ensure, the relevant appropriate
and authorised Manuals, Procedures, Instructions, Rules,
Regulations, Drawings and Plans are available to those who
needs them, that they are maintained up to date and they are
authorised for use. Protection, Distribution, Data backup and
storage of Electronic media is also included under the purview of
Document Control.
“Major Non Conformity” An identifiable deviation which pose a serious threat to personnel
or ship safety or serious risk to the environment, which requires
immediate corrective action. Lack of effective and systematic
implementation of the ISM code is also considered a major
non- conformity.
“Risk Management” Is knowing and limiting risk. Knowing is relating to facts and
evidence. Limiting is loss Prevention
“Lost Time Injuries or LTIs” Lost Time Injuries are the sum of Fatalities, Permanent Total
Disabilities, Permanent Partial Disabilities and Lost Workday cases.
(LTIs = Fatalities + PTD + PPD + LWC )
An injury which results in an individual being unable to carry out
any of his duties or to return to work on a scheduled work shift on
the day following the injury unless caused by delays in getting
medical treatment ashore.
Note: An injury is classified as a “LTI” if the individual is
discharged from the ship for medical treatment.
SECTION 3
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
ADMINISTRATION Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : March 2011
MANUAL- PART I
Page -4- Approved by : Managing Director
Restricted Work Case (RWC) This is an injury which results in an individual being unable to
perform all normally assigned work functions during a
scheduled work shift or being assigned to another job on a
temporary or permanent basis on the day following the injury.
Medical Treatment Case (MTC) This is any work-related loss of consciousness (unless due
to ill health), injury or illness requiring more than first aid
treatment by a physician, dentist, surgeon or registered
medical personnel, e.g. nurse or paramedic under the
standing orders of a physician, or under the specific order of
a physician or if at sea with no physician onboard could be
considered as being in the province of a physician.
MTCs include:
• injuries which result in loss of consciousness, even if the
individual resumes work after regaining consciousness
(N.B. this does not cover loss of consciousness due to ill
health);
• sutures for non-cosmetic purposes;
• use of casts, splints or other means of immobilisation;
• any general surgical treatment;
• removal of embedded objects from eye by surgical means;
• use of other than non-prescriptive drugs or medications;
• use of a series of compresses for treatments of bruises,
sprains or strains;
MTCs exclude the following:
• first aid, LTI and RWCs;
• hospitalisation for observation without treatment;
• a one-off tetanus injection;
• consultative visit to, or examination by, a physician or
registered professional for the purpose of a confirmatory
check
First Aid Case (FAC) This is any one-time treatment and subsequent observation
or minor injuries such as bruises, scratches, cuts, burns,
splinters, etc. The first aid may or may not be administered
by a physician or registered professional.
FACs include:
• follow-up visits to a physician or nurse for observation
ONLY, or for routine dressing change;
• negative X-ray results;
• cleaning abrasions/wounds with antiseptic and applying
dressing;
• irrigation of eye and removal of non-embedded foreign
SECTION 3
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
ADMINISTRATION Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : March 2011
MANUAL- PART I
Page -5- Approved by : Managing Director
Total Recordable Cases (TRC) The sum of all work-related fatalities, lost time injuries,
restricted work injuries and medical treatment
Injuries.
NEAR MISS An incident which did not result in injury, illness or damage.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 4 Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page -1-
4.1 ORGANISATION
ORGANIZATION CHARTS
IN
The company has a fleet cell structure. Each fleet cell is about 20 ships with one fleet manager,
techncial superintendents and marine superintendents.
The SID (Safety and Insurance department) functions were transferred to the Fleet cell with the
marine superintendent moving to fleet cell from SID. The insurance department was seperated as
a separate department. The Safety and QMS functions were transferred to the Marine Director.
Ref to the SID Director in the manual's header is historical and those functions are now taken
over by the Marine director.
MANAGING DIRECTOR Final decision maker for ensuring safety of personnel, vessels
and the environment. (In his absence one of the Departmental
Directors is his substitute, ie. Marine or Technical)
DIRECTOR MARINE Marine HR: responsible for ensuring that vessels are at all times
manned with sufficient number of qualified and experienced
Officers and Ratings. He is responsible for selection of qualified
and licensed personnel and to ensure that recruiting offices
follow the Company guide lines when selecting personnel for
services on board.
MANAGER Safety :
(SAFETY, QUALITY Responsibility for the Company SIRIS system, reporting directly
& RISK) to the Director Marine. Responsible to assist Director in bringing
about an improvement in safety performance and shipboard
management in the fleet, that will be both sustainable and
ongoing,
Quality Management Systems : In charge of Company’s Quality
Management programmes, including. Monitoring, verifying and
reviewing Company’s policies on Health, Safety & the
Environment,
MARINE He ensures that the Company’s SHEQ policy is complied with by:
SUPERINTENDENT Vessels.
(!) DESIGNATED PERSON The DPA provides the link between the Company and those on
board to ensure safe operation of the vessel.
The responsibilities and the authority of the DPA (s) include
monitoring the safety and environmental protection aspects of the
operation of each ship and ensuring that adequate resources and
shore-based support are applied as required. The DPA has ISM
reporting line to the Managing Director and the ISM reporting line is
shown in the Organisation chart.
(!) DIRECTOR PROCUREMENT Responsible for the implementation and upkeep of the Purchase
System. He is assisted by a Manager, Supervisors & Purchasers
and co-ordinates with Technical Department.
(!) FINANCE MANAGER Responsible for Company and Owners accounts. Further details
are available in the Finance Department Manual.
CHIEF ENGINEER/ Responsible for promotion of Safe Working Practices, training and
CHIEF MATE monitoring within the departments. Responsible to the Master for
implementation and verification of the Shipboard Management System
on board.
Make pre-sailing reports to the Master concerning status of the
machinery, plant, equipment and watertight integrity of the vessel and
also on the personnel under their supervision.
The Chief Mate is responsible for maintenance of all deck equipment
including Safety (LSA & FFA), record, keeping, investigations and
inspections, and training of staff on board.
ENVIRONMENTAL The Third Officer and the Third Engineer have been designated as the
OFFICERS Environmental Officers. Details under Job descriptions
SAFETY OFFICER The Chief Officer is designated as Safety Officer for Personal Accident
Injury Prevention. Details under Job descriptions
SHIP STAFF Responsible for safety of the work place and have a duty and obligation
for reasonable care for the men, machinery and equipment under their
care. All members of the ships staff will familiarise themselves with the
ships safety systems and maintain training records within the purview of
the relevant ISM / SBM / SEP regulations. Details under Job descriptions
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : June 2010
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -7-
Organization Chart shows STANDARD Organization for NORMAL MANNING, and the actual complement
on board may be different, as per requirements of Safe Manning Certificate, Trade
and/or Owners Specific requirements
4.3. Ships Organization – Standard Manning
Each Vessel Under WSM Management to Prepare / Amend this Organization Chart to suit the manning on board.
Master
Catering Department
Elect. Officer 3rd Engineer
3 Officer
rd
(Environmental Officer)
(Environmental
Officer)
Chief Cook
4th Engineer
Deck Cadet
Pumpman / 6EP
Crew Cook
5th Engineer
Boatswain
Wiper
For Watch Keeping Deck Officers Report Directly to Master and Engineers directly to Chief Engineer
Pumpmans' Reporting lines for Cargo Watchkeeping - For Maintenance Chief Officer / Chief Engineer
Routine Reporting Lines - Which all personnel must comply with except under emergency situations
*Some owners may provide a Ships Clerk in the ships Complement. Refer Section 4.5.9.1 for Job Description.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : June 2010
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -8-
Organization Chart shows Shipboard Organization for Job descriptions only, and the actual complement
on board may be different, as per requirements of Safe Manning Certificate, Trade
and/or Owners Specific requirements
4.3.1 Ships Organization - For Job Descriptions
Each Vessel Under WSM Management to Prepare / Amend this Organization Chart to suit the manning on board.
Master
Add.2nd
Catering Department
Elect, Officer 3rd Engineer
3rd Officer Electro Tech. Officer
(Environmental Officer)
(Environmental Reefer/Electrical
Officer)
Engineer
Chief Cook
4th Engineer
Deck Cadet
Pumpman / 6EP Add. 4th Engineer
Crew Cook
5th Engineer
Boatswain
For Watch Keeping Deck Officers Report Directly to Master and Engineers directly to Chief Engineer
Pumpmans' Reporting lines for Cargo Watchkeeping - For Maintenance Chief Officer / Chief Engineer
Officers with GMDSS Responsibilities for Communication and Maintenance.
Wiper
** 2nd Officer is the Designated Communication officer.
Routine Reporting Lines - Which all personnel must comply with except under emergency situations
*Some owners may provide a Ships Clerk in the ships Complement. Refer Section 4.5.9.1 for Job Description.
Engine Boy
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : June 2010
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -9-
Master
Owners
Managers
Class
Insurance H&M and P&I
Discipline & Administration
WSM SEP Policy
SEP Implementation
SEP Matters Reporting /Review
Inputs to Management Review
SEP & Professional Training
WSM Drug & Alcohol Policy
Risk Assessment
Media Handling
Chief Engineer
Engine Department
Training & Discipline
Administration / Well Being
of Department Personnel
Environmental Officer
PMS Engine /Electrical
SMMS 3rd Officer
Risk Assessment.
Supervision Repairs/Maint. 3rd Engineer
Engine, Deck , Galley Ensure MARPOL
Machinery & Steering Gear compliance
Bunkering & Oil Record Book observe / correct / report
Dock Trials
Class Records for Dept.
SEP Review of Dept.Procedures
SEP & Professional Training
Chief Officer
2nd. Officer
PMS Deck
PMS Safety in-charge Navigation
Risk Assessment
2nd. Engineer Crew Discpline & Welfare
Charts & Publications
Overhauls & Supervision of Deck Cargo Operations Medical+OSH functions
Engine/Electrical/Galley as GMDSS - duties as directed by n Designated " GMDSS
- directed by Ch.Engineer Master Communications Officer' +
Physical automation Checks Deck machinery under Ch.Engnr PMS/Supervision of Radio
-including UMS Steering Gear under Ch.Engnr. And Navigation Equipment
Engine Dept.House keeping Spill Co-ordination
Training Crew in safety Ships Account
Training deptartmentPersonnel Ships Stationery
Training Crew in Pollution
-for Safety and pollution
In charge of Garbage
Drawing Watch list for Ch. Off +2nd.Eng
-and Crew members Management
to co-ordinate Oil Record Book (Tankers) &
Taking Lube.Oils as per for Deck & Engine Garbage Management Records
-instructions Operations and Bosun
Incinerator handling & records Maintenance Safety Officer (Personal Accident
Risk Assessment Prevention) Crew
Decks
Stores / House Keeping
Garbage handling under
-Ch.Officers Instructions
El.Off /ETO/ Rr.Eng
PMS Electrical equipment
PMS Communication
Equipment
PMS Nav.Equ. On GMDSS ships Chief Cook
Vibration Monitoring El. Off / ETO
Meggar readings Co-ordinate
Catering
Automation with GMDSS
House keeping
ICCP Systems Officer for Garbage Handling
Maintenance of Assisted by Messman
GMDSS Equipment Clerk & Ch.Cook Co-ordinate
as per Masters Instructions
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 10 -
JOB PURPOSE
To be overall in-charge and in command of the vessel and its crew. To ensure that the vessel operates
safely and efficiently in discharge of its obligations under any contracts that the Owners may enter into for
hire of the vessel or carriage of cargoes.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES/RESPONSIBILITY
1. Ensure that all shipboard activities are well planned and organised in compliance with WALLEM
objectives & policies and International Regulations.
2. Maintain good liaison with departmental heads to ensure that the vessel and its machinery are
maintained to highest standards and exercise budgetary controls for economic operation.
3. To issue appropriate orders and instructions to the ship’s personnel in a clear and simple manner.
4. Maintain regular and constant contact with WALLEM shore operation to: -
(a) Ensure seaworthiness and optimum vessel operational effectiveness / vessel resources
(b) Report any defects which may compromise safety or result in a hazardous situation for
personnel or the environment, and
(c) Keep them continually and timely updated on vessel's requirements for any stores,
repairs or other supplies in order to ensure safe and efficient operation.
5. To keep WSM shore operations advised of the vessel position and voyage status.
6. To ensure that loading, carriage and discharge of cargoes is carried out with despatch and
always in a safe, environmentally acceptable manner and in keeping with the terms of any
governing contract on carriage of cargo or hire of vessel.
7. To develop and maintain a harmonious and healthy working relationship with all personnel who
are in any way concerned with the ship's operation or loading and discharge of the cargoes.
8. To ensure that the benefit of his experience and knowledge is passed on to his subordinate staff,
guiding them suitably in discharge of their duties.
9. To ensure that all officers and crews are familiarised with the ships operations and are trained to
discharge their duties in a safe and efficient manner.
Ensure, within the framework of statutory regulations and internal orders, a constructive
employee relations climate, taking necessary disciplinary action to maintain it so.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2010
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 11 -
10. Ensure that all shipboard administration is carried out in an accurate and timely manner and in
line with WSM requirements and international regulations.
11. Ensure safety and management meetings are held as per WALLEM requirements, only deferred
if ship's operational requirements deem a necessary change.
12. Should an emergency situation develop the Master must take such immediate action, as he
considers necessary and keep WSM informed of the situation.
13. Ensure that the ship is seaworthy, properly equipped and manned to undertake the intended
voyage, including updated and corrected charts and publications.
14. The ultimate responsibility for the safety of the ship and crew rests with the Master and nothing in
the Shipboard Management Manual is to be construed in any way to limit his authority or to
relieve him of his full responsibility for the safe navigation and operations of the ship and safety of
his crew, environment and the property under his command.
If the Master at any time feels that commercial pressure or priorities are taking precedence over
safety matters, he is to seek the advise of the Designated Person Ashore who
will in turn deal with appropriate authority in Principals’ and/or WSM office.
15. To plan and carry out Surveys in time to ensure that vessel remains in class, without conditions
17. To maintain a true and correct record of all monies received and disbursed onboard. No
payments unless approved by WALLEM are to be made.
18. Train and develop all staff to meet the requirements of their jobs and towards possibility of
promotion and to comply with the requirements of the SEP in this context.
19. To implement and review the shipboard management system periodically, to verify the
effectiveness and /or goodness and to initiate constructive improvement to the system, by
informing WALLEM.
20. Master should not sign on an Officer or crew member who is not correctly certified, nor should he
release an incumbent until the office has been informed and remedial action taken.
21. In addition to the Job Descriptions of various personnel contained in this manual the Master
may institute additional job responsibilities to an Officer or rating, as he deems necessary.
22 If the SSP has designated the Master as the Ship Security officer (SSO), he will carry out the
duties of the SSO as described in the SSP. If the SSP has designated the Master as the backup
SSO, he will carry out his duties as described in the SSP.
CHANGE OF COMMAND
When a change of command takes place, the Master must hand all papers and documents concerning
the ship business to his successor and brief him on all cargo, operational and safety matters concerning
the impending voyage. WSM Form D20 is to be used for handing over. WSM Form D20 is available as
fill able form in SMS DVD and is to be used during change of command.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : March 2011
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 12 -
4.5.1 (Continued)
If the Master is incapacitated the Chief Officer will assume command. This is to be recorded in the official
logbook and WSM is to be informed as soon as possible. If, however, by virtue of the Master incapacity
he
is unable to relinquish command then the Chief Officer, after consultation with the Chief Engineer, will
assume command and make an entry into the official logbook. WSM is to be informed immediately.
STANDING ORDERS
On taking over command the Master is to issue his own standing orders to supplement WALLEM
procedures on Navigation, Cargo Operations, Safety and Training requirements.
He should write his "Night Orders" daily when at sea. (Refer Bridge Procedures Manual)
Within the context of the agreed voyage the Master is free to allocate priorities and resources, as he
thinks fit. He can modify voyages plans to avert potentially hazardous situations, and deploy shore
personnel as necessary for the vessel's needs. The Master may interchange or reassign the job
responsibilities of an officer or rating if deemed necessary.
The Master has overriding authority and the responsibility to make decisions with respect to safety and
pollution prevention and to request the company’s assistance as may be necessary. In the event of
Master excising such authority, or in the event of the Master deviating from the Established SEP system
he should as soon as practicable report in writing to the Company the specific deviation from the system
and the reasons thereof.
JOB CHALLENGES
To ensure that each voyage is executed safely as per terms of governing charter party.
To inculcate “Safety Culture / Awareness” and motivate the Ships Company towards reduction of
“Process Loss” and to achieve a zero defect operation of the vessel under his command.
RELATIONSHIPS
Fleet Cell Personn Insurance Marine Agent Class Port Owner Flag Ship Procure
INTERNAL/
EXTERNAL el Department Safety Authority Operator State Chandler ment
CONTACTS Dept Departme Comm. Depart
nt Manager ment
Navigation Urgent
Equipment Repairs
Charts & Local Local
Publications purchase Purchase
(a) The Master will deal directly with the Owner's Operation Department or as instructed by
them to follow Charterers' instructions.
(b) On matters of releasing cargo to consignee, i.e. Original B/L, Letter of Indemnity, etc.
Master to deal with Owners.
Should there be any anticipated delay Master should seek WSM Technical Departments
Assistance.
(c) For any operational difficulties concerning cargo Master to contact WALLEM Technical
Department.
(b) For Major Emergencies please refer to Company’s Major Casualty Contingency Manual.
(c) For Oil Pollution please refer to Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan/Vessel
Response Plan ( VRP/NTVRP). Refer to Communication
4.5.2.3 Communication – Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP)/ Vessel Response
Plan (VRP/ NTVRP)
Please refer to SOPEP/VRP or NTVRP for communication with the Qualified Individual (QI)
where applicable, and Owner/Managers Casualty Response Team (CRT). These contact details
are to be prominently displayed/readily available at Satcom & VHF positions.
Please refer to SOPEP/VRP or NTVRP for communication with the Qualified Individual (QI)
where applicable, and Owner/Managers Casualty Response Team (CRT). These contact details
are to be prominently displayed/readily available at Satcom & VHF positions.
nd reporting format in the MCCM.
When Oil Pollution is involved the 'Vessel Response Plan' ( VRP/NTVRP) overrides the MCCM
(a) For cargo claims, pollution, damage to fixed & floating objects (FFO) Master to refer to
Club’s handbook and request local correspondents attendance. Master to exercise
discretion where claim is only a remote possibility or very minor as correspondents’
appointed surveyors do charge fees. As far as practicable (time zone considered), the
Fleet Cell should be contacted first for making arrangements with P & I Club. Refer to
Notes 1 & 2
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page - 15 -
Note 1: For FFO please peruse insurance data first; as this could also be covered by H+M
underwriter in which case the Office will need to advise them as their contact details are not
available to the Master.
Note 2: Heavy weather damages to the vessel and equipment is covered by Hull and Machinery
underwriters.
(b) When crew are hospitalised Master to advise agents to have invoices endorsed by P & I
Clubs’ local correspondent.
(c) Master to advise agents specifically to follow up on the status of the hospitalised person/s
and to report the progress/condition to WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT .
(a) Master along with Chief Engineer is responsible for timely surveys and is to liase with
Technical Superintendent for surveys & renewals of certificates. Timely reminders on
surveys or Conditions/ Recommendations that are approaching the due date is to be sent
to the Technical Superintendent.
(b) For ISM/SMC and ISPS audits, Master to liase with Fleet Cell.
(c) All vessels have Class Directory should there be an urgent need of Class Surveyor’s
attendance.
Effective two-way communication between ship and office is essential and the procedures
outlined below must be followed: -
(a) The Master will be sent a copy of all correspondence addressed to the ship, with the
exception of letters of a strictly personal nature.
(b) All official letters from the ship are to be printed (On Printer) and must be seen and
initialled by the Master, who will retain a duplicate.
(c) All correspondence must be addressed to WALLEM and clearly marked with ship’s name
and for the attention of the Department concerned.
(e) Masters should encourage Officers to write their own reports on matters within their
respective areas of responsibility and on equipment under their care, leaving the Master
to comment further in the report as necessary.
(f) The Master must sign correspondence with his name; it is not acceptable simply to sign
"Master". This also applies to telexes, e-mail and facsimiles.
Please refer to SBM II for further details on communication including contact details and
correspondence.
a) Master to deal directly with ship chandlers for provisions and any stores, nautical
publications or charts and spares required in emergency for the voyage or safety of the
vessel and crew. (‘emergency’ means no time for sanction from office)
Before agreeing to any media meeting following a casualty or crisis situation, authority must be
obtained from one of the Media Response Team members (refer MCCM Sec. 3.3, Sec. 7.7 &
Appendix 4).
Please remember that media response is only part of the WSM crisis response programme and
is unlikely to have priority over reporting and dealing with other authorities, coastguard, etc. all of
which is contained within the company's manuals on the subject. NOTE: "WE ARE NOT
SEEKING MEDIA COVERAGE IN A CRISIS'.
4.5.2.10 Security
Refer to Ship Security Plan (SSP) for guidance notes on hijacking, anti-terrorism, and piracy
advises.
The Master is the person on board in charge of medical care and administering medicine to
seafarers on board. He shall have completed training in medical care that meets the
requirements of the STCW convention as amended. He may delegate duties of providing medical
first aid and upkeep of the ship’s medicine chest and all medical documentation including ship’s
medical log, forms required by the flag administration to the second officer.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : June 2007
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 17 -
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
1. All Operations in connection with Carriage of Cargo including Cargo Planning, Compliance with
ALL NATIONAL & INTERNATIONAL safety criteria for the intended cargo, Loading, Discharge
and Ballast sequencing, Calculation of stability and strength, Cargo/ Payload security & care,
Contingency planning for protection of the environment from damages caused by cargoes carried
on board are the primary job responsibilities.
At all stages of the voyage the vessel is to be maintained under Positive Stability, and within
prescribed Stress Limits. On large vessels the checks for hull stress are to be pre determined for
various load changes, including ballast changes.
2. To plan and oversee maintenance of hull, decks, superstructure, accommodation, cargo spaces,
deck and cargo machinery. To ensure that the vessel is always in a seaworthy, safe and efficient
condition.
3. To plan and carry out survey related maintenance in time to ensure vessel remains in Class.
4. To stand his watches at sea and ensure that vessel is always safely navigated when at sea or
safely moored when in port. He will take appropriate actions in conformity with all relevant
regulations and operational needs and will abide by Masters standing instructions.
5. To ensure that the vessel is always equipped with necessary stores and equipment to carry out
maintenance and to this effect he will raise necessary requisitions, for supplies in consultation
with Master.
6. To ensure that Company regulations, guidelines and policies are followed in respect of vessels all
operations and maintenance.
7. To assess training needs of the subordinates staff under his control and impart the appropriate
training to ensure that they are aware of safe working practices and the need to operate the
vessel in an environmentally friendly manner.
10. To carry out Risk Assessment for all daily tasks, i.e. maintenance & cargo operations. All
important and critical jobs require a documented risk assessment to be carried out. The format of
the risk assessment form is provided in the SMMS as an excel sheet and is to be used for
carrying out risk assessment. To carry out “Tool Box” meeting daily for all tasks planned for the
day prior start of work and also on site as situation demands.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : June 2007
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 18 -
4.5.3 (Continued)
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES/RESPONSIBILITY
10. To understudy the Master to ensure his readiness to take-over Master's role in case of the
Master's incapacity or absence.
He must ensure that written "In Port" standing orders relating to cargo operations are issued, so
that no confusion concerning loading/discharging operations occurs. He must maintain a proper,
Port log for all cargo operations. Same log is to be used for tank cleaning or hold cleaning
operations.
If there is any doubt in this respect the matter must be reported to the Master immediately.
11. The Chief Officer is responsible to the Master for ensuring that:
i) The maintenance of all safety, fire fighting and life saving appliances equipment onboard
is carried out and such LSA & FFA equipment are kept in a state of Operational
Readiness. Refer to PMS / SMMS
ii) The maintenance of all cargo gear is carried out.
iii) All accidents and dangerous occurrences are reported and investigated and, where
appropriate, preventive action recommended. (Please refer to SIRIS)
iv) There is adequate provision for the well being of ship's personnel.
v) Risk Assessment and “Tool Box” meetings are done for all daily maintenance jobs and
cargo operations, minimizing hazards and non-conformities.
12. Cargo
The Chief Officer is responsible to the Master for the safe stowage, loading, carriage and
discharge of cargo and compliance with Owners/Charterers, instructions regarding the cargo. He
shall make a positive report to the Master prior to each and every departure, and shall confirm
that the condition of the ship meets all the requirements of the Stability Booklet and will continue
to do so throughout the forthcoming voyage. He is responsible for the organisation of cargo work
and for tank or holds cleaning, and will direct Junior Officers accordingly. Safety regulations for
cargo must be strictly enforced and at no time are risks to be taken, which might endanger the
ship or the safety of the Ship's Company. On tankers it is the Chief Officer's responsibility to
ensure that a safe and efficient connection is made at the cargo manifold on the ship before
pumping operations commence and maintain a proper cargo operation and pumping log. The
Chief Officer is also responsible for maintaining any cargo pumping machinery spaces free of oil
and water.
14. Pollution
The Chief Officer is responsible to the Master for ensuring all adequate anti-pollution measures
are in operation as necessary. On tankers he is to maintain the relevant section/s of the Oil
Record Book.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 19 -
4.5.3 (Continued)
As Environmental Control Officer he is the designated person in charge & responsible for
carrying out the Garbage Management Plan i.e. ensuring that all garbage is handled, stowed,
processed and disposed according to Company’s Garbage Management Manual and in
compliance with MARPOL V and maintain records of same. The chief officer is the keeper of the
Garbage Log.
17. Safety Officer : As Safety Officer, he is required to ensure that risk assessment has been
carried out to identify hazards for important & critical operations with a goal to prevent injury to
personnel. The Chief Officer and Second Engineer would carry out risk assessment for their
respective departments or review the company Risk Assessment prior to the commencement of
the operation.
JOB CHALLENGES
To continuously improve deck department operation especially in relation to cargo management and
training of subordinate staff.
RELATIONSHIPS
* With Master and Chief Engineer to ensure effective team management of vessel operations.
* With subordinate staff to ensure harmonious operating environment.
* With Shore Staff to ensure vessel and shore operational requirements are complied with mutual
satisfaction.
JOB PURPOSE
To assist and understudy Chief Officer in all his duties and responsibilities under Master's direct orders,
specifically be in matters of care of cargo during loading, stowage and discharge, maintenance of ships
hull, cargo spaces, accommodation, safety appliances and all machinery related to vessels moorings and
load/discharge of cargo. In discharge of his duties and responsibilities he will always prepare himself for
subsequent promotion to Chief Officer. On GMDSS ships he will carry out communication duties as
directed by the Master
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
1. The Junior Chief Officer will have the same Job responsibility and accountability as the Second
Officer with the added function of assessing Ch.Officer in all the job responsibilities and
accountability as prescribed in this manual.
2. In GMDSS ships he will be the designated Communication officer.
JOB CHALLENGES
To grasp and practice hands-on, the procedures, operation and maintenance of the deck and cargo
related equipment. To prepare himself for eventual promotion to the rank of Chief Officer and be able to
take up the responsibilities and accountability of the new rank in the shortest time frame.
RELATIONSHIPS
* With Master and Chief Engineer to ensure effective team management of vessel operations.
* With subordinate staff to ensure harmonious operating environment.
* With Shore Staff to ensure vessel and shore operational requirements are complied to mutual
satisfaction.
ND ND
4.5.5 JOB TITLE 2 OFFICER / 2 MATE / Navigating Officer
JOB PURPOSE
To carry out as directed by Master/Chief Officer watch standing and deck operational duties designed to
contribute to safe economical vessel operation in compliance with owner and International regulations.
Also the keeping of the abstracts and such other forms as directed by Master. On GMDSS ships he will
be the “ Dedicated Communication” officer with responsibility for maintenance of Communication logs,
Radio accounting and assist in actual communication work.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES/RESPONSIBILITY
1. Responsible in maintaining all navigational charts and publications on board corrected to the
latest Weekly Notices to Mariners available on board. Maintain correction records.
2. Ensure that Passage Plans are prepared berth-to-berth and that all relevant, corrected charts and
navigational publications are on board for impending voyage.
(Further details in the Bridge Procedures Manual)
3. The monitoring of the navigational conduct of the vessel in its intended passage, and maintain
associated log sheets/abstracts.
4. Keep the Bridge and Chart room in a clean and tidy condition.
6. Assist the Chief Engineer in testing the steering gear for efficient operation after any repairs or
overhaul has been carried out. Report condition to Master.
7. Work for and with the Chief Officer in planning cargo related activities. Work for and with the
Chief Officer and as directed by him on all cargo matters.
8. Monitor weather reports in port, and update Master & C/O accordingly.
9. Ensure with the 3rd Engineer and the 3rd Officer that all safety equipment is regularly checked
and where necessary replaced. Refer to PMS / SMMS.
10. Take charge of deck crew as directed by senior officers for mooring, stores receiving and other
port duties.
11. Carry out watch standing duties and take appropriate actions in conformity with all relevant
regulations and operational needs.
12. Carry out ad-hoc assignments from the Chief Officer designed to develop experience in the job
and potential for development.
13. Formally understudy the Chief Officer obtaining knowledge and understanding of his job.
14. Monitor the condition of all bridge navigational equipment and report any defects to the Master so
that such defects can be rectified.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 22 -
4.5.5 (Continued)
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES/RESPONSIBILITY
16. Medical
He is responsible to the Master for health and hygiene onboard. He is the person on board
designated to provide Medical First Aid.
He shall have satisfactorily completed training in Medical First Aid that meets the requirements of
the STCW convention as amended, which will enable him to take immediate and effective action
in case of accidents or illnesses that are likely to occur on board and make use of medical advice
obtained by radio or satellite communication.
He is to report to the Master details of sick persons with a description of their condition. A list of
those on the sick list with details of the complaint, symptoms and treatment given is to be kept in
the Medical Log. He is to present the Medical log to the Master on a weekly basis for verification.
He is responsible for the maintaining the Ship’s Medicine Chest as per flag state requirements,
replenishing stock as necessary and verifying that all medicines on board are within their date of
validity. He will maintain all medical records and forms as per flag state requirements.
* Watch standing - All necessary actions to avert potentially hazardous situations in compliance
with Owner and International regulations.
* Personal Safety - Reduce LTI; eventual goal for LTIF is zero.
JOB CHALLENGES
RELATIONSHIPS
Appropriate certification, good navigational, safety, cargo handling, vessel manoeuvring and
administrative knowledge.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : June 2010
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 23 -
ND
4.5.6 JOB TITLE ADDITIONAL 2 OFFICER
JOB PURPOSE
Carry out, as directed by the Master or Chief Officer watch standing and deck operational duties designed
to contribute to safe, economical vessel operation in compliance with owner and International regulations.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Assist the Second Officer in maintaining navigational publications up to date as instructed by the
nd
Master. Normally the Additional 2 Officer corrects lists of lights volumes.
2. Carry out, under the direction of the Chief Officer the checking and where necessary replacing of
safety equipment. Refer PMS / SMMS.
3. Under direction from the Master supervise deck crew activities e.g. mooring, stores receiving.
4. Carry out watch standing duties and take appropriate actions in conformity with all relevant
regulations and operational needs.
5. Carry out ad-hoc assignments from the Chief Officer designed to develop competence in the job
and potential for development.
6. Formally understudy the 2nd Officer, obtaining knowledge and understanding of his job.
7. On GMDSS ships he will carry out communication duties as directed by the Master.
8. Should the Additional 2/O be keeping 8-12 watch, ie. 3/O’s duties, he shall be designated as the
Environmental Officer (EO).
9. Ship’s Environmental Officer (EO): 3/O along with 3/E is the EO. The purpose of the
Environmental Officer is three fold:
o Firstly, to assist the Master in ensuring the vessel and crew comply with Company’s SHEQ
policy and MARPOL, including any specific environmental laws of the Port State;
o Secondly, to assist to the Master in ensuring continuous environmental improvements are
made on board the vessel;
o Thirdly, to facilitate a broader environmental awareness on board ship. He acts as an extra
pair of eyes and ears for the Master.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 24 -
4.5.6 (Continued)
* Other activities - Under direction from the Chief Officer but with freedom to recommend
improved operating methods.
JOB CHALLENGES
* To maintain positive relationships with the crew which enables an understanding of their
problems while preserving their respect.
* Organising his own work to maximise his availability to assist the Chief mate and Master.
RELATIONSHIPS
* With subordinates in supervising their activities e.g. on watch standing or dealing with their
problems e.g. in medical role.
* With shore staff in co-operating to ensure vessel and shore operational requirements are
complied with mutual satisfaction.
Appropriate certification, up to date navigational knowledge and general knowledge of all deck
department operations.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 25 -
RD
4.5.7 JOB TITLE THIRD OFFICER / 3 MATE
JOB PURPOSE
Carry out, as directed by the Master or Chief Officer watch standing and deck operational duties designed
to contribute to safe, economical vessel operation in compliance with owner and International regulations.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Assist the Second Officer in maintaining navigational publications up to date as instructed by the
Master. Normally the Third Officer corrects lists of lights volumes.
2. Carry out, under the direction of the Chief Officer the checking and where necessary replacing of
safety equipment. Refer PMS / SMMS.
3. Under direction from the Master supervise deck crew activities e.g. mooring, stores receiving.
4. Carry out watch standing duties and take appropriate actions in conformity with all relevant
regulations and operational needs.
5. Carry out ad-hoc assignments from the Chief Officer designed to develop competence in the job
and potential for development.
6. Formally understudy the 2nd Officer, obtaining knowledge and understanding of his job.
7. On GMDSS ships he will carry out communication duties as directed by the Master.
8. Carry out the maintenance of all meteorological equipment including maintaining the relevant logs.
9. Ship’s Environmental Officer (EO): 3/O along with 3/E is the EO. The purpose of the
Environmental Officer is three fold:
o Firstly, to assist the Master in ensuring the vessel and crew comply with Company’s SHEQ
policy and MARPOL, including any specific environmental laws of the Port State;
o Secondly, to assist to the Master in ensuring continuous environmental improvements are
made on board the vessel;
o Thirdly, to facilitate a broader environmental awareness on board ship. He acts as an extra
pair of eyes and ears for the Master.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 26 -
4.5.7 (Continued)
* Other activities - Under direction from the Chief Officer but with freedom to recommend
improved operating methods.
JOB CHALLENGES
* To maintain positive relationships with the crew which enables an understanding of their
problems while preserving their respect.
* Organising his own work to maximise his availability to assist the Chief mate and Master.
RELATIONSHIPS
* With subordinates in supervising their activities e.g. on watch standing or dealing with their
problems e.g. in medical role.
* With shore staff in co-operating to ensure vessel and shore operational requirements are
complied with mutual satisfaction.
Appropriate certification, up to date navigational knowledge and general knowledge of all deck
department operations.
(!!) 4.5.8 JOB TITLE - ADDITIONAL THIRD OFFICER/ ADDITIONAL 3RD MATE OR JUNIOR
WATCHKEEPING OFFICER
JOB PURPOSE
Carry out, as directed by the Master or Chief Officer watch standing and deck operational duties designed
to contribute to safe, economical vessel operation in compliance with owner and International regulations.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Assist the Second Officer and Third Officer in maintaining navigational publications including
lists of lights up to date as instructed by the Master.
2. Carry out, under the direction of the Chief Officer, the checking and where necessary replacing
of safety equipment in accordance with PMS / SMMS.
3. Under direction from the Master or Chief Officer supervise deck crew activities e.g. mooring,
stores receiving.
4. Carry out watch standing duties and take appropriate actions in conformity with all relevant
regulations and operational needs.
5. Carry out ad-hoc assignments from the Chief Officer designed to develop competence in the
job and potential for development.
6. Formally understudy the 3rd Officer, obtaining knowledge and understanding of his job.
7. On GMDSS ships he will carry out communication duties as directed by the Master.
8. Carry out the maintenance of all meteorological equipment including maintaining the relevant
logs.
9. Assist 3/O who along with 3/E is the Ship’s Environmental Officer (EO): The purpose of the
Environmental Officer is three fold:
o Firstly, to assist the Master in ensuring the vessel and crew comply with Company’s
SHEQ
policy and MARPOL, including any specific environmental laws of the Port State;
o Secondly, to assist to the Master in ensuring continuous environmental improvements
are made on board the vessel;
o Thirdly, to facilitate a broader environmental awareness on board ship. He acts as an extra
pair of eyes and ears for the Master.
* Watch standing - All necessary actions to avert potentially hazardous situations in compliance
with owner and International regulations.
* Other activities - Under direction from the Chief Officer but with freedom to recommend
improved operating methods.
* EO related - Assists EO in reporting any intentional environmental violation to Master
and Company as necessary.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page - 28 -
JOB CHALLENGES
* To maintain positive relationships with the crew which enables an understanding of their
problems while preserving their respect.
* Organising his own work to maximise his availability to assist 3/O, 2/O, Chief mate and Master.
RELATIONSHIPS
* With subordinates in supervising their activities e.g. on watch standing or dealing with
their problems e.g. in medical role.
* With shore staff in co-operating to ensure vessel and shore operational requirements are
complied with mutual satisfaction.
Appropriate certification, up to date navigational knowledge and general knowledge of all deck
department operations.
JOB PURPOSE
To undergo training for eventual appointment in the Fleet as a qualified Officer in the deck department.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. To understudy and assist other Officers in Deck and Other departments as nominated by the Master
or Chief Officer from time to time.
2. To progressively learn the trade along the guide lines and task functions as outlined in the cadets
training record book, and to complete the various training modules in the correct time allotted.
3. To carry out specific tasks as ordered by the Master or Chief officer or other Officers under whom
he is delegated to learn / practise the task.
4. To complete assignments and Specific training tasks as directed by the company onboard and or
ashore.
JOB CHALLENGES
* To Uphold the objectives / Policies of the company and put the same into practice during the
execution of the tasks assigned and to work diligently and conduct in a professional manner.
Learn and cultivate “Profession Oriented” skills for self and professional improvement.
RELATIONSHIPS
* With all members of the Ships Company in learning and appreciating they’re various job
requirements and functions on board.
Normal Entry level - High School/ 12th Standard, with sound fundamental knowledge of
Physics/Chemistry and Mathematics as foundation for building up
professional knowledge.
JOB PURPOSE
With the advent of GMDSS and subsequent manning of vessels with out Radio Officers, in order to assist
Masters in Administrative, Clerical, Communications, and Accounting the Ships Clerk is employed.
The assignment of Ships Clerk on board on some vessels is dictated by special requirements of the trade
and/or owners requirements.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
2. Maintenance of various records, documents, and stationery items as delegated and required by
Master.
* As delegated only and within the scope or purpose for which employed.
JOB CHALLENGES
Learn and cultivate “Profession Oriented” skills for self and professional improvement..
To plan effective mail distribution, despatch and filing.
To plan and implement optimisation of stationery and stationery storing work.
To be proficient with in-house Administrative / Accounting / Storing / Maintenance Software’s and assist in its
implementation and optimisation.
To co-ordinate with all departments for collection, recording and despatch of various electronic and other
relevant data including maintenance of data on electronic media.
RELATIONSHIPS
With all members of the Ships Company in learning and appreciating they’re various job requirements and
functions on board.
Normal Entry level - High School/ 12th Standard, with basic computer skills in contemporary Office
Software. A Radio Officers background could be beneficial but not essential.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : June 2007
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 31 -
JOB PURPOSE
To be responsible for efficient operation of ship's propulsion plant and auxiliary engines, all other
machinery and equipment fitted onboard the vessel for loading and discharge of cargo and mooring of the
vessel in order the vessel executes its intended voyages in an economic and timely manner.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES/RESPONSIBILITY
1. Plan and organise in collaboration with the Master all Engine Department activities in the most
cost effective and safe manner in line with voyage needs and in compliance with WALLEM and
International regulations.
2. Ensure that all Engine Department machinery and equipment is rigorously monitored and
routinely maintained in line with maker’s specifications and statutory regulations.
3. Plan and execute all non-routine and major maintenance work in a timely and cost effective
manner and with minimum disruption to voyage plans. To ensure that WALLEM Planned
Maintenance Systems /SMMS as applicable are followed.
4. Ensure that all Engine Department machinery and equipment is operated to this full efficiency
levels in order to meet Charter Party requirement.
5. Keep the Master regularly advised of the operational status of all machinery onboard and to alert
him in advance of any possible delays or inefficiency that may be expected due to mal-operation
of any machinery.
6. Maintain a close working relationship with WALLEM Technical staff, keeping them appraised of
Engineering performance and identifying work to be done during dry-docking.
7. Ensure the correct forecasting of all Engine Department store, spares, including bunker fuel and
lubricants, the ongoing monitoring of inventory levels and the requisitioning of further supplies.
8. Develop and train all Engineering Staff to meet the requirements of their jobs and the possibility
of promotion.
9. Ensure that all Engine Department administration is carried out in an accurate and timely manner
and inline with WALLEM requirements and International regulations.
10. To be responsible for ensuring when unmanned machinery spaces operation can be carried out
safely and advise the Master accordingly.
11. To ensure that either himself or 2nd Engineer are always promptly available when vessel
navigating in enclosed waters. During arrival and departures from Port, the Chief Engineer would
nd
be in the ECR. During long passages, the 2 Engineer would relieve the Chief Engineer in the
nd
ECR. In addition, Chief Engineer to ensure that either himself or the 2 Engineer are available in
the ECR/ Engine room during certain passage through choke points like One Fathom Bank,
Singapore Strait, Dover Strait etc. These areas are to be decided in consultation with the Bridge
team.
11A Chief engineer taking over, to check that bilge pumping arrangement is as per original line
diagram. Please refer to SBM I Sec 11.5.1 on OWS for full details.
11B Chief engineer taking over, to check that there are no “Magic Pipes” in Oily disposal system and
that the seal numbers on the flanges of the OWS discharge line match the numbers logged in the
SMMS. He will also check the condition and operation of the OWS and the incinerator. Chief
Engineer will then send a message to office confirming that all MARPOL Equipment are in good
working order.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : June 2007
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 32 -
4.5.10 (Continued)
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES/RESPONSIBILITY
12. Responsible for the proper working of, and all repair to, Engine Room, Machinery, Deck and
Pump Room Machinery, Hotel Services and all electrical equipment in consultation with Master.
He will plan co-ordination between Electrical Officer and Radio Officer for any repair or planned
maintenance on radio and navigational aids.
13. When operational difficulties occur which affect the machinery performance or may cause delays
to vessel then a detailed report of this with recommended remedial action is to be forwarded to
WALLEM by quickest means unless it is felt that the problems can be expeditiously handled by
ship staff which case a mailed report will be in order.
14. To remain in- charge of his normal duties and responsibilities when the vessel is undergoing dry-
dock repairs and to ensure that prior leaving dry-dock all sea connections and piping are secured
and tight.
15. Following completion of Periodical overhauls and before the ship sails after repair, a dock trial is
to be make of all machinery and the result reported to the Master and to WALLEM.
16. On joining the vessel, the Chief Engineer must exchange a take over list with the outgoing Chief
Engineer on which will be recorded lubricating oil and bunker quantities onboard. The Chief
Engineer must satisfy himself as to the operational and maintenance status of all machinery and
if there are any deficiencies then it must be recorded and reported to the Company. To avoid any
conflict it is recommended that both incoming and outgoing Chief Engineers countersign this
condition report. WALLEM form E8 is to be used for making out handover/take-over report.
17. As Chief Engineer to be overall in-charge of all Maintenance work on the machinery in the Engine
Room and on deck he is personally to supervise maintenance or delegate to Second Engineer.
18. On joining the ship the Chief Engineer is to issue his own standing orders to supplement
WALLEM procedures. If the Engine room is in manned condition for any reason, he should write
his "Night Orders" daily when vessel is at sea
19. The Chief Engineer must prepare a daily noon report which shows engine running time within last
24 hours, engine speed, percentage of slip, fuel consumption and receipt of bunkers if any.
20. Bunkering
The Chief Engineer is responsible to the Master for ensuring that adequate bunkers are onboard
of sufficient quality and quantity with safe margin for next voyage. Refer to Bridge Procedures
Manual section II. The Chief Engineer is responsible to the Master for ensuring that the relevant
sections of the oil record book are correctly maintained, Chief Engineer is in-charge of bunkering
and to follow bunkering procedure as per vessel's Oil Contingency Plan and relevant Checklist on
bunkering.
4.5.10 (Continued)
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES/RESPONSIBILITY
22. Chief Engineer is to ensure that prior vessel entering confined waters, making port or departing
port, the steering plant is tested for good operational efficiency and an entry of this test procedure
is to be recorded in the Engine Room Logbook.
23. Chief Engineer is to ensure that before a vessel proceeds to sea, all machinery are in good
working order for the vessel to remain seaworthy, in class and in a condition fit to prosecute the
voyage.
24. Chief Engineer is to ensure that a true and correct record of all events in the Engine Room
relating to each machinery operation, maintenance and breakdown history is maintained onboard.
25 If the SSP has designated the Chief Engineer as the Ship Security officer (SSO), he will carry out
the duties of the SSO as described in the SSP. If the SSP has designated the Chief Engineer as
the backup SSO, he will carry out his duties as described in the SSP.
The authority to maintain discipline within his department rests with the Chief Engineer who may, through
Master recommend any disciplinary or dismissal action to be taken by the Company.
JOB CHALLENGES
To continuously optimise the performance and upkeep of all machinery onboard in order the vessel may
trade commercially in an economic and efficient manner.
To continually improve Engine department operation especially in relation Engine resource management
and training of subordinate staff.
RELATIONSHIPS
* Close working relationship with the Master, Chief Mate and 2nd Engineer in planning and
organising shipboard activities.
* With external Engineering Staff of the WALLEM Group with whom he is the primary point of
contact.
Appropriate certification for the rank with past experience on the type of machinery fitted onboard the
vessel he is assigned to.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : June 2007
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 34 -
To plan and organise in co-operation with the Chief Engineer and through Engineering staff the optimum
operation and maintenance of the Engine Department and electrical and mechanical maintenance
throughout the vessel.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
4.5.11 (Continued)
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES/RESPONSIBILITY
11. Duties
The Second Engineer must keep a full record of overhauling and repair work carried out and of all
gauging and boiler water tests. These records are to be presented at regular intervals to the
Chief Engineer for his signature. The Second Engineer is responsible for the cleanliness and
orderliness of the engine and boiler rooms and for the proper and economical use of all stores,
tools and spare gear, an inventory of which he will keep.
The Second Engineer is in charge of the engine room staff. He is to see that the Chief
Engineer's instructions are carried out by efficient organisation and is to direct the engine room
staff accordingly.
The Second Engineer must keep the Chief Engineer fully informed about the progress of
maintenance and repair work, running of the machinery, conduct and ability of the staff and is to
report immediately to him any unusual occurrence in the engine room.
JOB CHALLENGES
* How best to organise agreed programmes of work in the best possible manner.
* Seeking to minimise engineering problems throughout the vessel.
* Carrying out technical engineering calculations.
RELATIONSHIPS
* With Chief Engineer and Chief Mate to ensure agreement on priorities and co-ordination of Deck
and Engine Department activities.
* With subordinates to provide motivation and ensure good working relationships.
Appropriate certification and sound practical marine engineering experience of 5 years or more covering
mechanical/electronic /electrical engineering.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 36 -
rd
4.5.12 JOB TITLE 3 ENGINEER
JOB PURPOSE
To carry out as directed watch standing and specific Engine Department maintenance
duties designed to contribute to safe, economical Engine and vessel operation in
compliance with owner and international regulations.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Ensure that the status of the boilers and all associated steam generation equipment is regularly
monitored, appropriate logs kept and any problems brought to the attention of the Chief Engineer.
(*)
2. Ensure under the direction of the 2nd Engineer that all-necessary maintenance and overhauls of
the above machinery are carried out in a timely and cost effective manner.
3. Ensure that the status of main engine fuel valves, air-starting valves, fuel p/p suction valves and
exhaust valves, are checked and necessary maintenance carried out. (*)
4. Work with the 3rd Officer in ensuring that ship safety equipment is periodically tested and
defective items replaced. Refer PMS / SMMS.
5. Provide guidance and training to the junior engineering officers concerning the maintenance and
operation of the machinery for which he is accountable.
6. Carry out watch standing duties and take appropriate actions in conformity with all relevant
regulations and operational needs.
7. Carry out general repair and maintenance work as directed by the 2nd Engineer.
* Machinery allocation between 3rd and 4th Engineers may be changed by the Chief Engineer as necessary.
8. Ship’s Environmental officer (EO): 3/E along with 3/O is the EO.
The purpose of the Environmental Officer is three fold:
o Firstly to assist the Chief Engineer in ensuring the vessel and crew comply with Company’s
SHEQ policy and MARPOL, including any specific environmental laws of the Port State;
o Secondly to assist the Master in ensuring continuous environmental improvements are
made on board the vessel;
o Thirdly, to facilitate a broader environmental awareness on board ship. He acts as an extra
pair of eyes and ears for the Chief Engineer.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 37 -
4.5.12 (Continued)
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES/RESPONSIBILITY
JOB CHALLENGES
* To ensure a continuous high level of performance for the plant for which he is responsible.
RELATIONSHIPS
* With his superiors and fellow officers as part of the vessel engineering team.
Appropriate certification and at least three years marine engineering experience with sound
understanding of his specialist area and a good general knowledge of all the ships engineering activities.
th
4.5.13 JOB TITLE - 4 ENGINEER
JOB PURPOSE
To carry out as directed watch standing and specific Engine Department maintenance duties designed to
contribute to safe economical engine and vessel operation in compliance with owner and International
regulations.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Ensure that the status of the auxiliary engines, oil purifiers, fresh water generators, aux.pumps
and air compressors are regularly checked, appropriate logs kept and any problems brought to
the attention of the 2nd Engineer. (*)
2. Carry out under the direction of the 2nd Engineer all necessary routine maintenance of the above
machinery to ensure good operational performance.
3. Carry out analysis and tests of all lubricating oils in service, renewing these where necessary.
4. Maintain an up to date inventory of all lubricating oils, and greases.
5. Helping the Chief Engineer on bunker operations and those associated with fuel, diesel and
lubricating oil transference.
6. Carry out watch standing duties and take appropriate actions in conformity with all relevant
regulations and operational needs.
7. Carry out general repair and maintenance work as directed by the 2nd Engineer.
* Machinery allocation between 3rd & 4th Engineers may be changed by Chief Engineer as he deems necessary.
RELATIONSHIPS With his superior and fellow officers as part of the vessel engineering team.
Appropriate certification and at least two years marine engineering with sound understand of his specialist
area and a good general knowledge of all the ships engineering activities.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page - 39 -
th
(!) 4.5.14 JOB TITLE - ADDITIONAL 4 ENGINEER OR JUNIOR WATCHKEEPING ENGINEER
JOB PURPOSE
To carry out as directed watch standing and specific Engine Department maintenance duties designed to
contribute to safe economical engine and vessel operation in compliance with owner and International
regulations.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
th
1. Same as the 4 Engineer.
th
2. An additional 4 Engineer is included into a Ships complement because vessel trade or
machinery including deck machinery (Cargo Pumps) make it necessary. He will be allocated
specific job responsibilities by the Chief engineer as required.
RELATIONSHIPS With his superior and fellow officers as part of the vessel engineering team.
Appropriate certification and at least two years marine engineering with sound understand of his specialist
area and a good general knowledge of all the ships engineering activities
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page - 40 -
(!) TH
4.5.15 JOB TITLE - ENGINEERING CADET OR 5 ENGINEER OR JUNIOR ENGINEER
JOB PURPOSE
To undergo training for eventual appointment in the Fleet as a qualified Engineering Officer in the Engine
department.
To be professionally trained in the art of being a Seaman /Marine Engineer / and a professional Mariner
leading towards the achievement of professional qualifications and Goals.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. To understudy and assist other Officers in Engine and other departments as nominated by the Chief
Engineer from time to time.
2. To progressively learn the trade along the guide lines and task functions as outlined in the graduate
Engineers training record book, and to complete the various training modules in the correct time
allotted.
3. To carry out specific tasks as ordered by the Chief Engineer or other Engineering Officers under
whom he is delegated to learn / practise the task.
4. To complete assignments and Specific training tasks as directed by the company onboard and or
ashore.
JOB CHALLENGES
To Uphold the objectives / Policies of the company and put the same into practice during the execution of
the tasks assigned and to work diligently and conduct in a professional manner.
Learn and cultivate “Profession Oriented” skills for self and professional improvement.
RELATIONSHIPS
With all members of the Ships Company in learning and appreciating they’re various job requirements and
functions on board.
JOB PURPOSE
Check the operational status of all electrical equipment throughout the vessel carrying out all necessary
maintenance and repair work under the direction of the Chief Engineer.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Monitor on a regular basis the status of all ship electrical equipment, especially motors, batteries,
lights, switchboards, impressed current protection, making such replacements as are necessary
and keeping the required logs.
2. Carry out, with the authority and under the direction of the Chief Engineer the overhaul and
maintenance of electrical equipment if necessary in collaboration with the second engineer and
engine room staff.
Note: For day to day maintenance work, Chief Engineer’s authority is delegated to the Second
Engineer.
3. Maintain an up to date inventory of the consumable electric stores informing the Chief Engineer of
any requirements.
4. Keep the Chief Engineer informed as to the status of all electrical equipment on board.
5. Carry out as directed by the Chief Engineer any specific assignments.
6. Carry out vibration checks as directed by Chief Engineer.
7. The E/O is to carry out maintenance of GMDSS equipments as directed by the Master / Chief
Engineer.
Can carry out replacements or maintenance of minor items. More significant maintenance work needs
the approval and review of the Chief Engineer. The jobholder then predominantly works on his own on its
execution.
JOB CHALLENGES
Gaining an understanding and knowledge of electronics and heavy current electrical engineering.
RELATIONSHIPS
The jobholder may also be called up on to play a "lead role" where significant electrical maintenance or
repair work is required.
JOB PURPOSE
In addition to the duties of Electrical Officer described in 4.5.16 the R/E/E when assigned to a reefer vessel
will also be in charge of operation of cargo hold refrigeration plant and related maintenance work. He will
report directly to the Chief Engineer for all matters related to the cargo refrigeration plant.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Start and stop the refrigeration plant for cargo compartments as per direction of Chief
Officer and or Chief Engineer. He will obtain, in writing the carriage conditions from the
Chief Engineer who is given it by Master or Chief Officer, and maintain them during the
voyage. Maintain record of all parameters in the reefer log and if required in charterer's
log sheet.
2. Monitor the plant parameters and cooling down periods and compare them with the
required values. Any deviation is to be reported to the Chief Engineer as soon as they
are detected.
3. Check and maintain fans, controllers, temperature sensors, data logger and or strip chart
recorders, Ozone plant and compressors, etc. in good order. Plan and carry out routine
maintenance work on compressors, condensers and controllers. In all maintenance work
the Second Engineer will assign him help.
4. Maintain record of all maintenance work and spare parts inventory. Prepare requisition for
supply of parts and material required.
5. Assist Duty Officer in checking the temperature and provide electrical power for reefer
containers when they are loaded on the ship. However if the containers are loaded during
such hours that R/E/E is having his rest then this job is to be attended to by the Duty Officer
and R/E/E called only in case of any difficulty. During the passage, the Duty Officer will
monitor temperature of container(s) but in case of any abnormality, repairs will be attempted
by R/E/E under supervision of Chief Engineer.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page - 43 -
4.5.17 (Continued)
* Can start and stop any equipment related to the reefer plant if he considers it necessary. However
he must advise the Chief Engineer about his action. All maintenance work is planned in consultation
with the Chief Engineer. Any assistance required is arranged by Chief or Second Engineer. The
officer then works entirely on his own.
JOB CHALLENGES
RELATIONSHIPS
* With the Chief Engineer in discussing and reviewing status of reefer plant, cargo carriage conditions
and operation of plant.
Extensive and sound experience as Electrical Officer, then served as trainee reefer engineer on a
refrigerated cargo carrier for a minimum of three months
JOB PURPOSE
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
Communication/Navigational Equipment
1. Monitor Equipment performance, carrying out Diagnostic Checks and undertake appropriate steps
for preventive maintenance and repairs.
2. Review equipment spare part inventory initiating requests for supplies where necessary.
5. To prepare monthly equipment status report as required by designated Shore Based Maintenance
Company.
Electrical/Instrumentation
7. Monitor on a regular basis the status of all ship Electrical Equipment, especially Motors, Batteries,
Lights, Switchboards, Cathodic Protection; making such replacements as are necessary and
keeping the required logs.
8. Carry out with authority and under the direction of the Chief Engineer, the overhaul and Maintenance
of Electrical equipment, if necessary in collaboration with the Fitter.
9. Maintain an up to date inventory of the consumable Electrical Stores informing the Chief Engineer of
any requirements.
10. Keep the Chief Engineer informed as to the status of Electrical Equipment on board.
4.5.18 (Continued)
JOB CHALLENGES
* Gaining an understanding and knowledge of electronics and heavy current electrical engineering.
* Equipment fault finding and repair.
RELATIONSHIPS
* With Master:
- Administrative assistance
- Upkeep of Communication/Navigational Equipment.
* With Chief Engineer:
- Discuss & review Electrical Work.
JOB PURPOSE
To ensure that all cargo handling systems are fully maintained and to operate them during cargo related
activities under the direction of the Chief Officer.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
* Operation - works to instructions given by the Chief Officer during cargo related
activities.
* Maintenance - works to established status monitoring timetables and on overhauls and
maintenance under the direction of the Chief Officer and Chief Engineer.
JOB CHALLENGES
RELATIONSHIPS
Sound knowledge of cargo handling systems gained through practice experience over some years,
supported by specialist courses e.g. crude oil washing, pump operation. Possess the relevant STCW
certificate for the relevant ship type.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 47 -
JOB PURPOSE
Carry out maintenance and repair work on mechanical equipment throughout the vessel under the
nd
direction of the 2 Engineer.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Carry out with the authority and under the direction of the 2nd Engineer the overhaul and
maintenance of mechanical equipment if necessary in collaboration with the electrician.
2. Maintain an up to date workshop inventory informing the 2nd Engineer of any requirements.
3. Keep the 2nd Engineer informed as to the status of all mechanical equipment on board.
nd
4. Carry out as directed by the 2 Engineer any specific assignments.
Can carry out replacements or maintenance of a minor character. More significant maintenance work e.g.
nd
welding needs the approval and review of the 2 Engineer. The job holder then predominantly works on
his own on its execution.
JOB CHALLENGES
RELATIONSHIPS
With the 2nd Engineer in discussing and reviewing mechanical work. The jobholder may also be called
upon to play a "lead role" where significant mechanical maintenance or repair work is required.
Time served as mechanic, with extensive welding and general workshop experience and sound practical
experience of marine applications.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 48 -
JOB PURPOSE
Carry out maintenance and repair work on mechanical equipment throughout the vessel under the
direction of the Chief Officer.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Carry out with the authority and under the direction of the Chief Officer the overhaul and
maintenance of mechanical equipment and renewal of steelwork as necessary.
2. Maintain an up to date workshop inventory informing the Chief Officer of any requirements.
3. Keep the Chief Officer informed as to the status of all mechanical equipment on board.
Can carry out replacements or maintenance of a minor character. More significant maintenance work e.g.
welding needs the approval and review of the Chief Officer. The job holder then predominantly works on
his own on its execution.
JOB CHALLENGES
RELATIONSHIPS
With the Chief Officer in discussing and reviewing mechanical work. The jobholder may also be called
upon to play a "lead role" where significant mechanical maintenance or repair work is required.
Time served as fitter, with extensive welding and general workshop experience and sound practical
experience of marine applications
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : June 2007
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 49 -
JOB PURPOSE
To plan and organise the deployment of deck crew to ensure that all assigned deck operations and
maintenance activities are effectively carried out.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Carry out by the appropriate deployment of deck crew, all those activities specified by the Chief
Officer.
2. Monitor deck crew's daily work ensuring it is done with safe working practices. To carry out Tool
box meeting daily with the deck crew for all tasks planned for the day prior start of work and also
on site with the deck crew as situation demands
3. Ensure that deck equipment, material, specially personnel protection equipment including
harness, safety lines etc. are maintained in the best possible manner.
4. Ensure that all deck stores are received, stored, kept in good condition and levels monitored and
controlled.
5. Provide direction and leadership to crewmembers, dealing where necessary with group or
individual personal problems, within established procedures.
6. Supports and assists the Chief Officer in carrying out vessels Garbage Management plan i.e.
handling processing, storage and disposal of ships garbage.
7. Keep the Master and Chief Officer fully informed on all crew activities bringing to their attention
potential problem areas. Maintain crew discipline.
8. Carry out watch standing duties as required.
9. Ensure that newly joined deck crew are made familiar with the handling of deck machinery,
specially the Windlass and Mooring Winches.
Which crew members to use based on an assessment of numbers needed and the abilities and
performance of individuals.
JOB CHALLENGES
RELATIONSHIPS
10 years deck experience, and a high level of emotional stability and maturity.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 50 -
4.5.23 JOB TITLE ABLE & ORDINARY SEAMAN (Or GP1 & GP2)
JOB PURPOSE
To carry out as required any allocated maintenance or operational tasks or watch standing duties.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Carry out watch standing duties as directed by the officer on watch, bringing to his attention any
unusual situation.
2. Carry our maintenance tasks as directed by the Bosun on the ship fabric and deck equipment.
3. Carry out any operational duties connected with cargo related activities or manoeuvring as
directed by the Bosun.
4. Bring to the attention of the Bosun any ship defects or peculiarities of operation.
5. Carry out safety and security inspections.
Carries out tasks specifically as directed by the Bosun or officer of the watch and in line with ship internal
orders.
JOB CHALLENGES
RELATIONSHIPS
Familiarity with the operation of most deck equipment e.g. winches, sandblasting equipment and with
several years shipboard experience, and certified helmsman. Possess the relevant STCW certificate for
the relevant ship type he is serving on.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 51 -
JOB PURPOSE
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
JOB CHALLENGES
RELATIONSHIPS
This is an entry point position, which can be carried out satisfactorily with minimum shipboard experience.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 52 -
JOB PURPOSE
To carry out watch-standing duties under officer supervision and to provide general assistance across the
full range of Engineering Department activities.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Check as directed by the Watch Engineer plant status, taking and logging machinery readings.
2. Bring to the attention of the Watch Engineer for his action any apparent malfunctions.
3. Carry out as directed by the Watch Engineer any actions necessary to ensure good Engine
Department operation.
4. Carry out cleaning duties both for specifically designed machinery and as directed by the 1st
Engineer.
5. Carry out maintenance duties with Engineer Officers, mechanic or electrician as directed by the
1st Engineer.
6. Assist in ship painting, provisioning, shore loading, cargo tank cleaning, if necessary under Chief
Officer supervision.
7. Carry out general ship maintenance duties as called upon to do so.
8. Carry out mooring and unmooring duties when required.
nd
9. Supports ships Garbage Management Plan as directed by the 2 Engineer
The jobholder carries out all activities under direct instruction from Engineer Officers both during and off
watch.
JOB CHALLENGES
To continuously improve his operating skill, and knowledge of the operation of all Engineering machinery.
RELATIONSHIPS
Two to three years of shipboard experience as Wiper. Possess the relevant STCW certificate for the
relevant ship type he is serving on.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 53 -
JOB PURPOSE
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
JOB CHALLENGES
RELATIONSHIPS
This is an entry point position, which can be carried out satisfactorily with minimum shipboard experience.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 54 -
JOB PURPOSE
To ensure that meals are planned and prepared, using the contractor supplied provisions in the most cost
effective manner and meeting with the satisfaction of the ships officers and crew, under the guidance of
the Master.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Plan a programme of meals designed to make best use of available provisions and satisfy crew
preferences.
2. Ensure that palatable meals are consistently prepared in a timely and hygienic manner.
3. Ensure that all food is being effectively used with minimum spoilage.
4. Maintain the galley; provision storeroom and refrigerators in a hygienic condition.
5. Check prior to signing receipts that all provisions are satisfactory, bringing to the notice of the
Master those cases where this is not so.
6. Monitor and control provision inventories initiating requisition for additional requirements.
7. Ensure that all food is preserved in the best possible manner.
8. Ensure, through the mess man and mess boy that food is served to officers and crew in an
efficient and courteous manner.
9. Monitor and control linen and cutlery.
10. As designated support staff of Ships Garbage Management Plan he ensures correct processing
of garbage is done i.e. separating food wastes, plastics and domestic wastes, handling, stowage
and eventual disposal.
11. Supervise the job of 2nd Cook.
JOB CHALLENGES
* Ensuring that the planning and preparation of the food maximises simultaneously, crew
satisfaction and victualling budget.
RELATIONSHIPS
* Supervision of catering staff.
Sensitivity to crew needs and reaction to the food provided.
KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS & EXPERIENCE
Professional cook, with good preservation experience and with 3-4 years shipboard experience.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 55 -
JOB PURPOSE
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Assist the Chief Cook in the cooking of food and following his directions.
2. Assist the Chief Cook in preserving food.
3. Carry out provision checks together with the Chief Cook.
4. Clean the galley store rooms and refrigerators.
5. Carry out general and cabin cleaning duties when required, i.e. when only one Messman in ships
complement.
6. Assists the Chief Cook (PCO) in complying with ships Garbage Management Plan and complies
with his instructions in processing handling and stowage of same.
JOB CHALLENGES
RELATIONSHIPS
JOB PURPOSE
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
1. Ensure that all cabins of officers and senior staff are prepared and cleaned.
2. Prepare the officer’s messroom for meals, subsequently serving meals with politeness and
efficiency and then cleaning all dishes and utensils.
3. Bring to the attention of the Chief Cook (PCO) any messroom equipment requirements.
4. Wash all ships linen at the frequency specified in internal orders.
5. Control the linen and cleaning consumable stores as directed by the Chief Cook (PCO).
6. Maintain himself available to assist the Master whenever Port Authority representatives are on
board.
7. Assists the Chief Cook (PCO) in complying with ships Garbage Management Plan and complies
with his instructions in processing handling and stowage of same.
The jobholder can anticipate demand for extra cabins and prepare accordingly.
JOB CHALLENGES
To identify and suggest improvements to procedures and systems in the areas for which he is responsible.
RELATIONSHIPS
* With officers in the officers mess where it is necessary to provide service in a fair manner.
* With crew in relation to linen washing.
JOB PURPOSE
To contribute to an acceptable shipboard standard of accommodation and meal service for non-officer
crew through the serving of meals and cleaning of crew quarters.
JOB ACCOUNTABILITIES
JOB CHALLENGES
RELATIONSHIPS
This is an entry point position that can be carried out satisfactorily with minimum shipboard experience
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2012
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 58 -
4.6.3 Familiarisation Booklet for Safety and Shipboard Familiarisation ( Rank Specific)
All Officers will receive ship and rank specific book for Safety and Shipboard
Familiarisation from the Master or his deputy and it is the duty of the individual to have
this book updated and signed by the Master. Master are to ensure that all sub contractors
and other shore personnel, such as riding gangs are also given the familarisation booklet.
The incoming staffs will familarise themselves with the safety equipment and understand
their SEP responsibilities and will hand over their familiarisation card, ship and rank
specific familiarisation record book, and their personal Qualifications to the Master.
This book is to be checked and completed on his joining by the new staff within 24 hours
or prior to the offsigning of the person being relived.
Incoming Staff are referred herewith to the delegation of Masters “SEP Responsibilities”
flow chart in section 4.4
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2010
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 59 -
Individual officers / other ranks who are issued with this record for maintaining their own
records of Training and Familiarisation of various vessel to which they are assigned.
Section 1 of this booklet must be completed soonest after the Officer joins the vessel and
this section supplements the “ Emergency Familiarisation Card” as mentioned in section
4.6.2.
Section 2 is record of the various audio and video training and also other training the
officer has received and is issued pursuant to the STCW convention, Regulation 1/14.
VOD (video on demand) system has internal software, which maintains a record of video
training for each officer and crew. The vessel is sending the VOD export file to the
training centres where it is being uploaded into the shipmate. Hence, it is not required to
fill this section of the Training record book with training on VOD.
5.1.1 Responsibility
WALLEM recognises that Safety and Environmental Protection is a Line Management
responsibility.
Masters’ as part of Line Management have a duty to actively encourage all Officers and Crew to
accept the principle that injuries and accidents to personnel, damage to the environment and
property, including ship’s equipment can be prevented. In order to achieve this they must
promote high standards of safety consciousness, discipline and individual accountability onboard
their ship.
The objectives of maintaining a high standard of Safety, Health and Environmental protection on
board is enhanced with Safety & Environment Protection committee meetings, Management
meetings and Tool box meetings.
The purpose of the Safety & Environment Protection meeting will be to: -
Manage the day to day safety and environment protection matters on board and to give
crewmembers a voice on safety matters.
Highlight and solve safety-related problems on board. Situations that cannot be resolved
on board should be reported to WALLEM.
The Agenda for the meetings is to be drawn up in accordance with items in section 5.2. Minutes
of Safety, Health and Environment meetings should be kept and submitted by the Master to the
WALLEM Superintendent when he attends the vessel.
The minutes are to be signed by the Master, all department heads and selected crew members
(Bosun/ CPO and one Engine room crew).
A copy of the minutes of the Safety, Health and Environment Protection Committee meeting
should be kept on a clipboard in the ship’s office where it can be seen by all.
The Management committee should comprise of the heads of all departments and other officers,
petty officers and crew members nominated by the department heads
At least one Management meeting every fortnight, except when the vessel's schedule
does not permit, in which case the vessel should have at least one Management meeting
every month.
The Management meetings are forums to discuss the work done since previous meeting, Plan for
future Jobs and to co-ordinate inter departmental work. During the meeting, risk analysis
including any work permit and isolation and tagging arrangement for the work being planned is to
be discussed. The management meeting will also discuss the Port calls expected prior next
meeting and will discuss co-ordination of all Port activities and details of the cargo operations.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 5 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND VERIFICATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Oct 2015
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -2-
Ships Safety, Health & Environment meetings are intended to promote and improve awareness of
general safety and environmental issues.
A Safety, Health & Environment Protection meeting should be held at least monthly and as
soon as possible after any serious incident or accident within the company. The meeting
shall consist of all seafarers on board except the watch-keepers and would be presided by
the Master. The watch-keepers would be briefed later on the meeting by one of the senior
officers. The safety meeting after any serious incident or accident within the company
would be initated from the office.
The ship’s safety, health & environment meeting members shall assist in the implementation of
safety, health and environment policy.
For Hong Kong Flag vessels, please be in compliance with flag guideline 478 C which provides
details on the appointment and election of safety officials (which includes safety officer and safety
representatives) and their duties and authority including duties of safety committee. The flag
guideline 478 C is available in SMS DVD under Hong Kong Flag Merchant Shipping Information.
The Master in consultation with his senior officers will draw up an agenda for the meeting. The
ship staff will be notified of the agenda in advance.
The Safety representatives and the Ship’s staff is to be encouraged to give their opinions in the
meeting. The meeting will be held in a workshop fashion. The meetings should also be interactive
with lively discussions on matters of safety, health and environment including pollution prevention
measures and MARPOL issues should also be discussed during the meeting.
The meetings should be interactive instead of one way communication from the master or the
senior officers and the comments, suggestions for improvements, etc from various members
must be recorded in the meeting minutes.
Please refer to the review flow chart in section 5.12 which show the importance of the Ships
Safety, health & environment meeting in the review chain.
NIS and Norwegian registered vessels are to have a PEC meeting in addition to the above
meeting. The Members of the PEC and the schedule and frequency of the PEC meetings are to
be as per instructions in the Flag state rule book.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 5 Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND VERIFICATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page -3-
5.3 Office Feedback to Minutes of Safety, Health & Environment Protection committee
meeting
(!) Vessel will maintain the minutes of the meeting on board the vessel.
(!) Vessels are to send the minutes of the meeting to the Fleet Cell. The office response is to be
filed with the minutes.
Master's reviews are "Regular review to consider the need for system improvement".
Master's review is directed towards the system and should not interfere with the continuous
safety and quality improvements/corrective actions initiated by incidents/accidents or other things
"going wrong". For e.g. In case of an incident review of the “Process Loss” pertaining to an Oil
Pollution incident – it is evident that the system is not functioning as it should. The review
process should analyse and evaluate the existing procedures that were in use at the time of the
incident and initiate the changes required in the procedures to improve the process and thus
effect improved Loss Control.
Interpretation
Execution
The Master can include any element or function he finds relevant or necessary. The previous
accident /incident reports (SIRIS), Customer Inspection findings, Audit findings, Minutes of the
Safety, Health & Environment Committee Meetings and “SIRIS feedback” reports can be
considered as inputs for Master’s Review of the system. All such issues are to be addressed for
improvement of the system as a whole.
Masters review is consequently an open channel from the Master to the shore based
management, where he can present his views on the goodness of the management system. The
various procedures as outlined in the Manual and their implementation on board are an integral
part of Master’s review.
Direction
Vessel’s Half Yearly SMS Verification / Review Report is prepared and sent to the office
after the end of each Half year. Since it will be difficult for one Master to review the entire
system at the end of six months, the continuity of the review is maintained by being an
integral part of Master’s handing over notes.
The Master’s review is to be done at the time of handing over by a Master and a copy of the
Master’s review is part of the handing over notes. The Master’s review done at the time of the
Master’s handing over need not be sent to the office.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 5 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND VERIFICATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2015
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -4-
Documentation
Master to ensure that office responses are filed together with the feedback and maintained on
board as and when received.
The block diagram on procedure for system review elements for process improvement and risk
assessment are provided at the end of this section.
1) That the specific objectives of the Company’s policies are achieved and functioning.
2) The duty instructions for each rank are correctly understood.
3) That each crew - member is qualified to do his job.
4) All Officers and Engineers should also prepare hand written notes for their relievers, which
should include status of the equipment under their charge. Master & Chief Engineer will use
the appropriate company Forms for hand over. Each outgoing officer & petty officer with SEP
responsibilities (see section 4.4) should prepare handing over notes (hand written is
acceptable) pertaining to SEP for incoming staff, which should be verified and signed by the
head of department.
5) If required, comments on the overlap period required for any rank for proper familiarisation.
6) Procedures for critical operations are set up and appropriate checklists for the operations are
used and signed.
7) Training onboard is carried out so that each rank knows his duties.
8) SEP Responsibilities are discharged as per the SEP delegation chart in section 4.4.
9) If required, suggestions on any change or amendment of company forms or policies.
The C/Engineer has a Soft copy of the manuals. If he has any suggestion for system
improvement, he should discuss it with Master during Management Meetings or include in his
handing over notes.
The Master accompanied by the Chief Engineer and Chief Officer must make a thorough
inspection of the ship including the main deck, various deck outside accommodation, poop deck,
accommodation and machinery spaces, at least once in seven days.
During the inspection, it shall be ensured that the seafarer accommodation is clean, decently
habitable and maintained in a good state of repair.
The inspection should cover all accessible areas of the ship so as to ensure provision of decent
working and living conditions on board for seafarers.
During these inspections particular attention is to be paid to the spotting of Safety Hazards, Risks,
Potential Process Loss items, Emergency Headquarters, the progress of maintenance programs,
the cleanliness of the ship and to the condition of foodstuffs, the safety of the vessel and the
environment and if such defects noticed remedial action to be instituted for recovery.
The safety equipment and the safety preparedness also will be evaluated.
Appropriate entries are to be made in the ship’s Official Log of the Master’s and Chief Engineers
weekly inspections. The results of the weekly inspections of the accommodation and the
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 5 Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND VERIFICATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page -5-
For tankers, the Safety Officer will carry out a detailed inspection as per the Checklist in the tanker
operation manual. This is to be filled every month even through it is recommended that more
frequent inspections are done. A copy of the safety officer inspection checklist is to be sent to the
office along with the copy of the Safety meeting.
Each vessel will be inspected at least twice a year by Company’s Executive. As far as possible,
such inspection to be carried out by Superintendent in-charge of the vessel. However, if some
Executive is present in the port or area on some other business, then for economic reasons, he
can carry out the inspection.
The Executive who inspects vessels is to prepare a full technical report on the vessel’s condition,
safety standard and performance, as well as a brief statement on implementation progress of
Health, Safety & Environmental (HSE) Objectives & Programs. This report will include any
instructions/guidelines given to ship staff for upgrading vessel to required standards.
The maintenance and upgrading instructions as well as any noted deficiencies are to be entered
in the SMMS and to be followed up during subsequent SMMS exports to the office by the
vessel’s superintendent.
(!) Every vessel is to go through an Internal Audit once a year done by a Office executive. The purpose
of the audit is to determine whether the vessel is following Company’s Shipboard Management
System and whether the vessel’s condition is what the Owner expects.
The Internal audits needs to be carried out at a frequency of 12 Months and would be done
between 9 months to 12 month of the previous audit.
The Internal Audit may be arranged to coincide with a Superintendent’s routine vessel
inspection/attendance schedule.
When circumstances deem it necessary, the Internal Audits can be done by the incoming Master or
Chief Engineer prior to taking Charge of their duties. (In all cases the auditor must be qualified, i.e.
having attended a lead or Internal Auditor Course.)
(!) Audit NCNs and Observations must be addressed and corrective action taken by the vessel
priorImplementation due date. Once the corrective action has been implemented, the audit NC or
observation would be closed and closed copies sent to the vessel. The review of the verification of
effectiveness of the corrective action and preventive action would be carried out during next visit by
a Wallem executive.
Some owners and charterers may also carry out an inspection or audit either directly or through
their appointed companies. The observations from the Owners and charterers inspection and
audits are to be sent to the Fleet Cell.
Vessels are to follow up to close the observation and update the Fleet cell as required.
5.6.5 External Audits by Class for ISM/SMC and ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001
nd rd
All ships have an SMC valid for 5 Years with an intermediate audit anytime between 2 and 3
anniversary of the initial audit. The renewal audit must be completed before the certificate
expires and may be carried out from six (6) months before the expiry date.
The Company also has ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 certification.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 5 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND VERIFICATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2015
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -7-
Certificate Year
0 1 2 3 4 5
ISM Initial intermediate Renewal
5.7.3 PORT STATE CONTROL INSPECTIONS – Requirements for Hong Kong flag ships:
Please refer to Hong Kong Marine Department Security & Quality Advisory No. 23 (Establishing of
Quality Assurance System in the Ship management Company).
1. PSC inspection results will be gathered at least once every 2 weeks from the web-sites of
HKMD, USCG and other MOU to obtain PSC inspection data of all Hong Kong ships, ie own
ships and other HK ships and new PSC information, detentions and deficiencies.
2. Notify all ships in management about the PSC information, detentions and deficiencies to all
HKG ships to guide the Master to avoid a recurrence.
3. Examine PSC situation of own HKG ships, analyse causes of detentions deficiencies and trend.
Prepare improvement plans and follow up actions.
4. Compile performance statistics, improvement plans, review reports of own ships on the three
indicators – detention rate, deficiency rate and inspection without deficiency rate.
5. Review the effectiveness of improvement plans and actions.
6. Submit the performance statistics and relevant
The (Safety Incident Reporting and Investigation System) SIRIS is the Wallem in-house
developed SIRIS program, for accident, near-miss and non-conformity reporting.
It has been established that behind each accident lie one or more root causes and it is necessary
to uncover these causes and learn from them. Near Miss and Non conformities have important
lessons.
In accordance with our Objectives & Policies, and in order to provide a Safe Environment for our
Seafarers, the Management uses SIRIS as an Analysis Tool. To effect improvement, and in
order to have the necessary information, the officers and crew are to report Accidents, Near-miss
and non conformity in the SIRIS. The non conformities which can be immediately corrected are
to be reported through the BBS card. The non conformities requiring follow up are to be reported
through the SIRIS.
1. PSC Inspections – Copy of the report will be sent to the as E-Mail attachment to the fleet.
Superintendent and vessel will then have a dialogue to implement corrective action and close
the observations. Vessel will also send the PSC observations in the Infopath form.
2. External Audits – Copy of the report will be sent by the vessel to the Fleet Cell and the fleet.
The superintendent will then have a dialogue with the vessel to implement the corrective
action and the Marine Superintendnent will follow up and advise the Class of the corrective
action.
3. Internal Audits – Copy of the report will be sent by the vessel to the Fleet Cell. The Auditor
will send a copy of the NC/Observation note and the checklist to the Fleet Cell. Once the
corrective action is implemented, the Master will inform the Marine superintendent for closing
the NC/observations.
4. Other Inspections ( Charterers, Oil major etc) – Copy of the inspection report will be sent to
the Fleet Cell as E-Mail attachment. Corrective action would be taken and the Inspection
Company advised once corrective action is implemented.
Lost time injury is said to occur if a person does not report for work on the next workday
and this is ticked in the SIRIS.
The Fleeet Cell are responsible for checking and closing the SIRIS reports. Marine Safety would
review the reports and present relevant details at Management Review meetings.
Vessels would be immediately notified by E-Mail of any major accident in the fleet. Master’s
would also be instructed to hold a safety meeting on receipt of the mail (as operational
parameters permits) to discuss the major accident. Vessels would also be immediatly notified of
(!) safety related information.
Fleet Personnel Accident Statistics will be compiled and analysed in the office. The trends and
finding from the analysis would be discussed during WFOM and video conferences. Important
trends that are noted with the compilation and analysis of the data would be discussed during
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 5 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND VERIFICATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -9-
management reviews. Copy of the management review would be sent to all ships and the
training centers. To assist in compiling these statistics, the Masters and Chief Engineers are
encouraged to motivate their officers and crew to prepare SIRIS reports. “Blame Culture” is not
WSM's style and there should be no cause for concern of disciplinary action if and when an
accident or near-miss is reported. Feedback on accidents of lost time, Near- Misses and Non-
Conformities are essential for realistic analysis, experience feedback to other vessels and
eventually towards an overall improvement in our loss record.
WSM emphasizes that “ Safety Awareness “ is the duty of every man on board and every one
onboard must make a practice of checking all personal and shipboard safety equipment for its
immediate readiness and if found wanting should report it to the senior officer or Safety Officer.
PSC deficiencies need not be sent through SIRIS for non-tankers. They have to be sent by
Infopath file to the office for uploading into the Chemserve 3D Database. The Infopath
file should have all the deficiencies with corrective action and preventive action. Once the
Infopath file is uploaded into the Chemserve 3D, the superintendent would check the preventive
and corrective action and close out the PSC findings.
For Tankers as per (VIQ 2.4), please ensure that deficiencies issued during PSC
Inspections are raised as NC’s in the SIRIS system, and then closed out.
Remember that Loss Prevention in practice is transfer of Knowledge and experience. SIRIS will
assist in this transfer and we hope, assist in reducing accidents.
As all officers are encouraged to report to WALLEM via the SIRIS program, it is recommended
that the software be loaded in a PC, which is accessible to the maximum number of staff on
board.
While any officer can prepare a SIRIS Report, only the Master or his deputy should generate the
report. The Generated reports are to be sent as email attachments to the office.
The SIRIS report has Software encoding to ensure the full report is filled-out; if any "required"
fields are left blank, the report will not allow itself to be saved, and will prompt the user to fill in
the blank fields.
All SIRIS reports received via email will automatically be uploaded into our shore database,
where registered office users can refer them. It is therefore important that you send all
reports to the GADATA email address only - the SIRIS report format cannot be read at
other addresses.
SIRIS Version 2 is now in use. This version allows for correspondence between the ship and the
office on the report prior closing out the report. This provides an opportunity for the office to
obtain further details or clarification on any aspect of the report. On other occasions, the Office
may not require any further details on the report and there would be no further correspondence
prior closing the report.
Once the SIRIS Reports are analyzed (with or without further correspondence) in the office, the
report would be closed and an attachment would be sent to the vessel with Instructions to upload
the file into the SIRIS System. Once this file is uploaded, the SIRIS reports would be closed out
and this can be seen in the last section of the SIRIS report.
Hard copies of the SIRIS reports are not mailed to the office.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 5 Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND VERIFICATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page - 10 -
The accidents have been divided into 3 types based on the severity of the accident. Each of the
(!) accidents have a different authority, time line and close out process. These are outlined in the
table on the next page.
All Accident / Incident should be reported by the SIRIS System which requires the Basic cause to
be identified. The level of investigation would be the same as the category of the accident.
The Person appointed to lead or carry out the investigation for Category I and Category II
investigations will not be connected to the accident. When a navigational or cargo accident is
investigated by office executive, the investigation will be done by a Marine superintendent. For
investigation of Machinery accidents by office executive, the accident investigation will be carried
out by another superintendent and not the superintendent who is in charge of the vessel. Near
Miss incidents with potential consequence equivalent to category I or II accidents would be
investigated as category I or II accident.
For both Category I and Category II Accident investigations, outside experts may be employed
depending on the nature of the case. This would be decided by the Marine Director or the
Technical Director.
Accident investigation for category I and II accidents will be carried out office investigator
(superintendent) who has completed the Accident investigation course. All New investigators will
carry out one accident investigation as an understudy prior to carrying out independent accident
investigation.
Close out of accident reports of Category I and II accidents involving technical issues or failures
would be by the Technical Director. All accident reports of category I accident I would be closed
by the Marine or Technical director. All accident reports of category II accident would be closed
by the Marine Safety.
In addition to SIRIS reports, enhanced SIRIS to be carried out for Category III if there is flag state
or port state or oil major involvement in the accident. This would be decided on a case by case
basis by the Fleet Manager in consulatation with Marine Safety.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD
SECTION 5 Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
REVIEW AND VERIFICATION 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL- PART I Rev. Date : Dec 2016
Approved by : Directors
Page - 11 -
* In the case of Explosion/Fire on tankers, the accident investigation may be elevated to investigation for Category I or II by the Marine Director even if the loss is below
the stated amount. This would be based on the type of accident and nature of accident.
Personal Injury Damages with Minor Oil spill To be reported Director/ Managers Manager and above
leading to implication of (Spill in the water of 1 within 3 hours or in Marine safety in Marine safety
Repatriation or Financial barrel or less but more as soon as safe (MSQR / (MSQR /
II hospitalisation Loss >50,000 than a sheen in the to do so Compliance) and Compliance) and
USD but < water) Directors/Heads in Head and above in
150,000 USD Technical Technical
** In case of collision or Grounding, the accident investigation may be as per Category II even if the loss is below 50,000. This would be based on the type of ship and
the nature of accident and decided by the Marine Director
Personal Injuries on Damages with Spill contained on Board To be reported Enhanced Marine Superintendent or Technical
investigation would
board requiring implication of or minor sheen in the within 24 hours Manager for enhanced investigation.
be decided by
Treatment (includes Financial Loss water Director/ Managers
III First Aid Treatment <50,000 USD in Marine safety
cases, Injuries which (MSQR /
Compliance) and
restrict work & LTI
Directors/Heads in
without repatriation) Technical
SECTION 5
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
REVIEW AND VERIFICATION Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I
Page - 12 - Approved by : Directors
System
Improvement Management Review
Masters Review
Accident/Incident
Investigation and analysis
Causality Information –
SIRIS
To implement Corrective
and Preventive Action.
Nonconformity
Identified and reported
Hazard
Identify the Hazard Incident
"Process Loss" Accident
e.g. "Cargo damage "
Masters Review /
Review the whole Management Review
Reviews the Overall Assess the Risk
Process Periodically
Effectiveness Goodness "Extent of Loss"
Is the Revised process
and initiates corrective
good for the system -is Procedural Changes
it giving the required
results?
System Audits
Verification by
Monitor the Controls objective evidence of
for Effectiveness Procedures achieving
Correct Process in desired results.
place Control the Risk
By Having the Right
Procedures for
Corrective Action correct Process
Check List the
Procedure
Implement the
Control
Verify the correct
Procedure is in place &
Followed
Directors
Managers Managing Technical
Superintendents Director Main/Area
In – Charge of
offices
Vessel
Managers
Superintendents
SECTION 6
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director FPD (JW)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
MANDATORY REGULATIONS Checked by : Director FPD (SF)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT AND CLASS CERTIFICATES 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -1-
All laws and regulations relating to the ship, crew and cargo made by the Flag State are to be
complied with at all times. Other regulations made by various governments, port authorities and
other regulatory bodies are to be complied with when applicable.
6.2 Annual Inspections, Mandatory reporting of incidents / accidents according to Flag state
administration requirements:
Please refer to Relevant Flag State Regulations regarding annual inspections and reporting
functions. For e.g.
Marshall Islands – The Administrator to be notified of any Marine Casualties, Marine Incidents,
Occurrences or Offenses from third parties less than 24 hours after they occur using the fastest
means available (Telephone, email or Fax). Please refer MI flag state guideline MG 6-36-2 for
details which is available in SMS DVD.
Hong Kong – Please refer HK flag guidelines for reporting of accidents and dangerous occurences
please comply with the reporting guidelines as per Section 12 of Cap 487 R which is contained in
the SMS DVD under HK Merchant Shipping Information.
PANAMA - With regard to deficiencies raised in an annual safety Inspections (ASI), it is required
to report to Flag State Section e-mail marsegur@amp.gob.pa using the prescribed Form (F-IASI-
01-01) within 30 days.
Similarly, Circulars for all flag states whose vessels are managed by the company are available in
the ‘SMS documentation’ DVD.
Masters are required to check requirements for the relevant flag administration and comply with
procedures for Annual inspections and mandatory reporting of incidents / accidents to flag states.
Complete the relevant casualty reporting form for the flag administration and send it to the office for
forwarding to the relevant department at the office of the flag administration.
Engine Bearings and Pressure vessels which can only be done by the class surveyor. In all cases of
survey by chief engineer, photographs are to be taken and suitable Log entries made. In certain
cases, reports like Calibration reports would also need to be prepared as applicable. In all cases,
proper entries are to be made in the vessels SMMS system. Please refer to Section 4.8 of SBM II
for further details.
6.6 USCG
All vessels have been issued with latest edition of USCG TVEL / Cargo Vessel Requirements
and it should be complied with vessels in the US Trade. The latest edition of TVEL is available in
the SMS DVD.
MLC standard A 4.1.4(a) requires regular inspection by a competent authority of the ship’s
Medicine Chest at intervals not exceeding 12 months.
The Company shall provide seafarers health protection and medical care, including essential
dental care as comparable as possible to that which is generally available to workers ashore.
This includes prompt access to the necessary medicines, medical equipment and facilities for
diagnosis and treatment and to medical information and expertise.
The following General Letters contained under General Letters, Insurance Section in the SMS
Documentation DVD provides detailed guidelines
- General Letter No.4: D-8 Medical Report Form & Monthly Medical Reporting Format.
- General Letter No.5: Medical Matters, Company Policy
- General Letter No.6: Medical: Focus on Health.
For medical advise by Radio or satellite communication when the ship is at sea, Masters are to
contact respective Medical Advisory Services for the vessel .
Seafarers shall be allowed to visit a qualified medical doctor or dentist without delay in ports of call
where practicable.
Seafarers Medical documents shall be maintained confidential and notified only to the company
office.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Mar 2015
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -1-
SECTION 7 PERSONNEL
To ensure all vessels are manned by professional, qualified, certified, experienced, medically fit
seafarers in accordance with national and international laws meeting customers’ requirements
and satisfaction.
The safety and welfare of our seafarers is of utmost importance to the company which entrusts to
these women and men the responsibility to operate and maintain the vessels according to
Wallem's Safety and Quality Management system.
Continually support better understanding of our business needs, corporate objectives, culture,
values, our operating procedures, policies and requirements.
Continually encourage and provide resources to our sea staff to upgrade their skills to improve
performance to enhance safety, quality, efficient operations and to serve our customers’ needs.
In ensuring compliance and a high performance environment, Wallem has in place the Just
Culture process.
The company will treat all seafarers fairly and respectfully without bias based on a seafarer's
colour, creed, gender, race or religion either in the employment of or in advancement of a
seafarer's career.
7.1 OBJECTIVE
FPD’s objective is to provide seafarers that are qualified, certified, experienced and medically fit.
The FPD is tasked with the overall management of seagoing staff and included in this is the task
of promoting a sense of loyalty and dedication by offering long term employment, service benefits,
and promotional prospects leading to a satisfying career path.
The FPD in close co-operation with our manning agents and WSM Representatives (where
appropriate) is also tasked to:
- ensure that all seafarers lined up for employment meet the national, flag state, Company, and
where applicable, customer’s medical standards;
- process the Contract of Employment for every lined up seafarer;
- ensure that all the seafarer’s training requirements are completed in preparation for his next
seagoing assignment;
- conduct a Pre-Departure Briefing or Orientation Seminar (PDOS) for all departing seafarers;
- apply for the appropriate flag state documentation based on the flag registry of the lined up
seafarer’s vessel of assignment;
- secure the necessary visa for the port of embarkation/transit country, as required;
- ensure that the travel arrangements and documentation of departing seafarers is complete;
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -2-
- ensure that all departing seafarers are issued with uniform/working gear in accordance with the
Company or customer’s requirements;
- ensure that all seafarers under contract or their allotees are paid promptly and correctly; &
- where applicable, ensure that union agreements are established and maintained between the
Company and seafarers unions or the International Transport Workers Federation (ITF).
The FPD endeavours to provide seafarers to our customers in order that their vessels are:
- operated with the highest priority being given to the safety of human life at sea and with the aim of
preventing accidents, personal injuries and any loss of life;
- operated in a safe, cost effective and efficient manner with due regard for the value of the vessel
and the cargo onboard;
- operated in a manner that protects and conserves the environment, particularly the marine
environment;
- operated in a manner whereby the vessel complies with all national and international laws; &
- fully prepared to handle any emergency situation that may befall the vessel.
The FPD recognizes and acknowledges that the purpose of the ShipMan or CrewMan Agreement
is to provide for a mutually beneficial and profitable relationship for the Company and our
customer (ship owner/operator).
Likewise, the FPD recognizes and acknowledges that the purpose of the seafarer’s Contract of
Employment and/or Collective Bargaining Agreement is to provide for a mutually beneficial and
profitable relationship for the Company and our customer (the seafarer).
The FPD shall not tender for, nor shall it secure any agreement, whereby if the agreement or
contract were correctly enacted upon, the resources of the FPD and/or its capabilities would be
shown to be insufficient for complying with the requirements of the contract.
The FPD shall not knowingly enter into any agreement or contract for the supply of seafarers
whereby it shall prosecute or abet in the participation of, or in any illegal activities by the customer,
his agents and/or representatives.
The FPD shall not knowingly enter into any agreement or contract whereby the enactment of
such an agreement or contract would render the Company, its agents or representatives liable to
participate in unsafe acts or practices.
The FPD is fully committed to upholding and maintaining the True North values of the Wallem
Group, with particular emphasis on:
All staff employed/engaged by the FPD and our approved manning agencies are strictly
prohibited from exploiting the seafarers with regards to offers of engagement on
particular ships, employment with particular customers, the arrangement and payment for
shore based training courses as authorised by the FPD, payment of allotments and
issuance of joining cash advances.
The policy also prohibits staff employed/engaged by the FPD and our approved manning
agencies, from soliciting gifts from seafarers at the end of their seagoing assignment.
The senior management of all manning agents have signed a statement making it clear that they
(or any person employed by, or acting on their behalf) will not solicit or accept any joining fees or
commissions from seafarers being employed onboard Wallem Shipmanagement vessels. Copies
of these signed statements are on file with the FPD.
Proven contravention of this policy will result in immediate dismissal of the staff member
concerned, or the immediate termination of our agreement with, or our employment of, as the
case may be, the “recruiting party”. The matter will be reported to the local police and a report
filed with the local authorities against the errant staff member or the manning agency as
appropriate.
"Petty Officer" - Fitter, Bo'sun, Chief Cook, Pumpman, Assistant Electrician are
deemed to be petty officers.
"Rating" - Persons serving onboard the vessel in the ranks of Able Seaman,
Ordinary Seaman, Motorman, Wiper, Cook, Stewards or
Messman.
"Crew" - Unless specified the ratings and petty officers may be generally
referred to as crew.
The Company embraces the Oil Companies International Marine Forum’s (OCIMF) Tanker
Management Self Assessment (TMSA) philosophy and is committed to the concept of
continual improvement.
TMSA requires that WSM audits key manning sources on an annual basis and part of that
audit will be to ascertain and ensure that manning agents conduct crew quality checks at
least annually.
The FPD will arrange for annual second party (customer/supplier) audits in order to verify
compliance with our policies, standards and procedures as set down in this manual as
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -4-
well as the crew quality checks as required by TMSA. Records of these second party
audits are maintained by the FPD.
7.6 MANNING LEVELS (MLC 2006 – Reg 2.7)
The Company will ensure that all vessels under its management have a sufficient number of
seafarers employed onboard to ensure that the vessels are operated safely, efficiently and with due
regard to security under all conditions, taking into account concerns regarding seafarer fatigue and
the particular nature and conditions of the voyage.
Where the vessel’s age, trading pattern, nature of the voyage, etc dictates that additional seafarers
should be placed onboard, the Company will review any requests from the Master and/or Chief
Engineer and take up such requests with the owner.
Every vessel shall be manned by a crew that is adequate, in terms of number and qualifications to
ensure the safety and security of the vessel and the crew onboard, under all operating conditions, in
accordance with the Minimum Safe Manning Certificate (MSMC).
The Company shall ensure that all seafarers serving onboard are competent for their position based
on appropriate education, examination, training (both in house and external) and experience. All
seafarers must hold a valid certificate of competency appropriate for the rank in which they are
being proposed in accordance with the STCW requirements. Seafarers serving on specialised
vessels shall hold endorsements for that type of vessel.
Where the national authority issues a certificate of competency for non watchkeeping personnel, i.e.
Electricians, Chief Cooks & Messman, etc, seafarers should also be in possession of such a
certificate.
No seafarer shall at any time serve in a capacity higher than the certificate/licence that he is holding.
Where required, seafarers must, in addition to their national certificates, hold equivalent certificates
issued by the flag state of the vessel for which they are being proposed.
The Company is committed to provide continuity of employment and open opportunities for career
growth/progression. Therefore, the Master and senior officers onboard shall at all times encourage
seafarers to study and take examinations in order that they are in possession (wherever possible) of
a certificate of competency/licence higher than the position in which the seafarer is serving. In
addition to strengthening our manpower pool, this will also facilitate onboard promotion.
The Company has nominated the Chief Engineer as the Shipboard Security Officer (SSO) onboard
and the Chief Officer as designated back up. Therefore all Chief Engineers and Chief Officers
joining must have attended an SSO course and join with their SSO certificate on hand.
Second Engineers and Second Officers seeking promotion should also obtain SSO certification in
case the possibility of onboard promotion arises.
Persons in charge of medical care onboard who are not Doctors shall have satisfactorily completed
training in medical care that meets STCW requirements.
In addition, seafarers designated to provide medical first aid shall have satisfactorily completed
training in medical care that meets STCW requirements.
7.8 EXPERIENCE
As far as practicable, only experienced seafarers are to be assigned. Experience can be broadly
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -5-
categorised as “tanker” or “dry cargo”. It is essential that seafarers being proposed for tankers as
well as OBOs, FSOs, etc have tanker experience and are duly trained and certificated unless
specific instructions from the owners are received waiving such a requirement.
The rank for which a seafarer is being considered/proposed must be commensurate with the length
and quality of their experience.
In the case of deck officers, experience of vessel type and size for which they are being
considered/proposed MUST be taken into account.
In the case of engineers, experience with the make and preferably the model of the engine, on the
vessel for which they are being considered/proposed is preferred.
Hiring “on promotion” is a practice NOT acceptable to the Company. By definition, “hiring on
promotion” refers to the hiring of a seafarer that has never previously sailed for the Company,
therefore has no recommendation for promotion in their file, and has never sailed before in the
rank for which they are being engaged.
However, there are certain situations where, when additional steps have been taken in order to
mitigate the risk, then the Company may consider hiring such a seafarer. Cases are limited to
Cadets (Deck, Engine or Electrical) that have completed a structured training program in another
company, and thereafter have obtained a recognized certificate of competency, and have
undergone:
- WSM evaluation including computer based assessment plus in house training at a Wallem
Maritime Training Centre (WMTC) followed by a comprehensive report from WMTC upon
completion of his training which must clearly include a statement recommending the seafarer to
join a WSM vessel;
- a thorough pre-departure briefing; &
- a seagoing assignment as a Cadet or Junior Officer for 3 months for further evaluation of
promotion potential.
During this assignment, Master or C/E must continuously assesses the seafarer’s performance and
if at the end of the evaluation period, the seafarer is considered suitable for promotion, the seafarer
commences his overlap period with the incumbent Third Officer, Fourth Engineer or Electrician in
preparation for taking over the position.
Oil Majors have established their own experience matrices for officers/engineers serving onboard
vessels chartered by them. This requirement MUST be borne in mind when lining up
officers/engineers for tanker vessels.
Should the Company not be able to meet the oil major’s specific matrix requirements, the following
steps can be taken in order to mitigate the risk:
- additional shore based training including a more detailed pre-departure briefing arranged at
- the office of the technical manager or through video conference;
- additional onboard training carried out by ship’s staff or shore based Safety/Training
Superintendent; &
- additional parallel sailing/extended handover time with outgoing officer.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page -6-
The Company is committed to continuously upgrade the knowledge and skills of the seafarers
serving onboard vessels under our management.
The Company recognises the need for a structured and systematic approach to seafarer training
in order to ensure that all seafarers onboard are well versed in both the Company culture and the
Company’s onboard management and computer systems.
The Company has established shore based WMTCs in our major seafarer engagement areas
and in addition, shipboard training is carried out by Marine Superintendents during attendance on
board.
General (Company) and WMTC specific TRAINING MATRICES and course schedules are
maintained for all in-house training centres and these are made available to FPD staff, manning
agents, Training Superintendents as well as onboard. Masters are instructed to post the “Training
matrices and the course schedules in public area notice boards (Saloons and Mess Rooms)
For seafarer’s on leave, all matrices are available on the Company website “www.wallem.com”
For seafarer’s on leave, all matrices are available on the Company website.
Training matrices also indicate refresher periods and it is the responsibility of the staff of the FPD
to ensure that seafarers boarding vessels are trained as per Company requirements.
The General WSM training matrix indicates rank specific training requirements, however, it is
appreciated that not all locations have a WMTC, therefore wherever possible, generic courses
shall be arranged locally, whereas WSM specific courses shall be arranged through a WMTC.
For countries where a WMTC has been established, the specific WMTC training matrix shall take
precedence over the General WSM training matrix.
For seafarers being engaged from areas where the Company has not established an in-house
training centre, the following steps can be taken to ensure that seafarers receive adequate
training/familiarization prior to joining:
ALL Cadets are to be seen as WSM’s future officers and therefore treated as such.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD (JW)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD (SF)
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -7-
Everyone onboard plays a vital role in ensuring that Cadets receive proper training and a well
rounded experience for the Cadet whilst they are onboard.
Senior officers are responsible for ensuring that Cadets are exposed to a wide range of shipboard
tasks, including cross department working time and experience.
Deck Cadets are to be given significant exposure to navigational watchkeeping, cargo operations
including stability calculations and mooring activities; whereas
Engine Cadets are to be given significant exposure to engine watchkeeping, ongoing maintenance
routines, diagnostics and fault finding as well as bunkering operations; &
Electrical Engineer Cadets are to be given significant exposure to engine watchkeeping, ongoing
maintenance routines and cargo activities, as applicable.
ALL Cadets are in possession of a Training Record Book, this MUST be reviewed by the respective
Senior Officers at the time that the Cadet joins and the Cadet’s training onboard planned accordingly.
Cadets, as officers/engineers under training, MUST take all meals in the Officer’s Messroom
regardless of nationality. Contravention of this policy WILL result in disciplinary action against the
Cadet as well as the senior officers onboard.
English is the working language of the Company and the majority of communication between the
ship and the shore based office(s) will be in English. It is therefore a requirement that all Officers
must be able to communicate in English at a level appropriate to their position onboard.
Masters, Chief Officers and Chief Engineers must have an above average command of the English
language (both spoken and written) as it is they who will communicate directly with Owners,
Charterers, Local Agents, Ship Suppliers, etc.
Junior Officers and Engineers must be encouraged to improve their English language skills in order
to be proficient by the time promotion to a management level officer position arises.
Deck Ratings must have sufficient familiarity with the English language in order that they can
perform the duties of helmsman and also gangway security watchman under the requirements of
the ISPS Code.
For seafarers sailing on single nationality ships where a common language exists, the English
language requirements may be lower, however the standards set above will always apply.
The Company will not exercise any bias based on a seafarer’s gender, colour, creed, race or religion
either in the employment of or in the advancement of a seafarer’s career whilst serving with the
Company.
The Company recognises that a balanced age and experience profile is most desirable and, in
general, the Company does not consider age (except for the minimum age stated below) as one of
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -8-
However, statistics have shown, age is a factor when reviewing medical claims, therefore, when
considering a seafarer for employment, details of the ship, trading pattern, knowledge of the
shipping industry and common sense has to factor in.
Certain positions onboard ship are physically demanding and require fit, healthy and physically
active seafarers to fulfil this role effectively, i.e. C/O on a capsize bulk carrier.
Also amongst the ranks of Ratings, the Company does not want to see such entry level positions i.e.
Messman, OS, Wiper, etc being filled up by older seafarers as this will block the path of promotion
for younger, may be more aspiring applicants to join the pool.
Customers (ship owners) sometimes provide us with acceptable age profiles. Where such age
profiles conflict with WSM requirements, the age profile provided by the customer is to take
precedence.
7.13 FITNESS FOR DUTY - WORK/REST HOURS (MLC 2006 – Reg 2.3)
As per the Manila amendments to STCW Code (enters into force 01 January 2012), all persons
who are assigned duty as officer in charge of a watch or as a rating forming part of a watch and
those whose duties involve designated safety, prevention of pollution and security duties shall be
provided with a rest period of not less than:
The requirements for rest periods laid down above need not be maintained in the case of an
emergency or in other overriding operational conditions. Musters, fire-fighting and lifeboat drills,
and drills prescribed by national laws and regulations and by international instruments, shall be
conducted in a manner that minimizes the disturbance of rest periods and does not induce fatigue.
Work schedules MUST be posted where they are easily accessible. The schedules shall be in the
working language of the ship and in English.
When a seafarer is on call, such as when a machinery space is unattended, the seafarer shall
have an adequate compensatory rest period if the normal period of rest is disturbed by call-outs
to work.
Records of daily hours of rest of seafarers are to be maintained to allow monitoring and
verification of compliance with the provisions of this section. The seafarers shall receive a copy of
the records pertaining to them, which shall be endorsed by the Master or by a person authorized
by the Master and by the seafarers.
Ship staff to ensure the work/rest hours records are accurately maintained on a daily basis. The
falsification of work/rest hours records is a serious violation and is not acceptable.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -9-
In order to comply with the regulations, it is required that the Master shall ensure that the hours of
work and/or rest periods of each seafarer onboard are clearly recorded and available for
inspection.
In order to meet this requirement, the Company has provided ALL vessels under management
with the DNV Navigator software.
In addition, Master and Chief Engineer are to ALSO maintain records of their work/rest hours
regardless of the vessel’s type or flag of registry. As above, such records are to be available for
inspection.
Nothing in this section shall be deemed to impair the right of the Master of a ship to require a
seafarer to perform any hours of work necessary for the immediate safety of the ship, persons
onboard or cargo, or for the purpose of giving assistance to other ships or persons in distress at
sea.
Accordingly, the Master may suspend the schedule of hours of rest and require a seafarer to
perform any hours of work necessary until the normal situation has been restored.
As soon as practicable after the normal situation has been restored, the Master shall ensure that
any seafarers who have performed work in a scheduled rest period are provided with an
adequate period of rest.
Parties may allow exceptions from the weekly required hours of rest stated above provided that
the rest period is no less than 70 hours in any 7 day period.
Such exceptions from the weekly rest period shall not be allowed for more than two consecutive
weeks. The intervals between two periods of such exceptions onboard shall not be less than
twice the duration of the exception.
Daily hours of rest provided above, may be divided into no more than three periods, one of which
shall be at least six hours in length and neither of the other two periods is less than one hour in
length. The intervals between consecutive periods of rest shall not exceed 14 hours. Such
exceptions shall not extend beyond two day in any 7 day period.
A team to specifically monitor work and rest hours of seafarers on vessels under Wallem
management has been set up in Mumbai. Their email ID is portsuper@wallem.com
Procedure is as follows:
a. Vessels must plan in advance and draw out a work schedule for port calls. If a rest hour
violation is projected at the planning stage, the first step is to check the possibility of
avoiding the violation with better work scheduling.
If the rest hour violation is still projected, vessel must send the planning sheet with their
recommendations to avoid such situation to rest hour monitoring team (email as above).
The team will review the planning and recommendation received from vessel and then
informs technical superintendent in charge of the vessel with the remedial measure for
further follow up.
b. Vessels must also inform the team whenever there is a rest hour’s violation along with
their plans to limit such violation to less than two weeks. Vessel will then send a message
to the team once the two weeks have passed and loop is closed.
One option is to provide the vessel with additional seafarers in order to meet rest hours
requirements during busy periods. However sufficient advanced notice is required to
ensure that seafarers are properly processed (including all documentation) for joining.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 10 -
c. Vessels are required to archive monthly rest hours reports in DNV Navigator software.
After archiving the vessel must send the monthly rest hours report to
portsuper@wallem.com .
If the monthly rest hours report contains any violations in seafarer’s rest hours, the
message regarding monthly rest hours must be copied to Technical Fleet group email
address and the Technical Superintendent in charge of the vessel.
Vessels would also inform the Port Superintendents whenever there is a violation along
with their plans to avoid any further violation for next two weeks. They would then send a
message to Port Superintendent once the two weeks have passed and loop is closed.
d. Whenever the DNV Navigator software shows a violation code in the “Non Compliance of
Rules” column, the vessel must insert an explanation into the remarks column and where
applicable, make reference to any exceptions permissible under STCW.
e. The musters, fire-fighting and lifeboat drills, and other drills conducted onboard should be
arranged to minimize the disturbance of the period of rest. Adequate compensatory rest to
be provided to make up for any rest time lost when the period of rest is disturbed by a call-
out for drills and musters as these should not be deemed rest periods.
7.14 HEALTH - BODY MASS INDEX (BMI) & PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL APPROVALS
Body Mass Index (BMI) is a number calculated from a person’s weight and height. BMI provides a
reliable indicator of body fatness for most people and is used to screen for weight categories that
may lead to health problems.
The Company recognizes that being overweight or obese increases the risk of many lifestyle
diseases and health conditions, including the following:
- Hypertension;
- Dyslipidemia (for example, high total cholesterol or high levels of triglycerides);
- Type 2 diabetes;
- Coronary heart disease;
- Stroke;
- Gallbladder disease;
- Osteoarthritis;
- Sleep apnea and respiratory problems; &
- Some cancers.
Therefore as part of the seafarer selection process, the seafarer’s BMI must always be taken into
consideration.
The Company has set the following BMI limits, a seafarer with a BMI:
- 18 or below; or
- 30 or above
For seafarers from Northern Europe, the Indian subcontinent, Russia, Ukraine & Romania with a
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 11 -
BMI of between 30 and 35 and where this, in the company doctor's opinion, is attributable solely
to physique with broad shoulders/large muscle bulk with main muscles clearly defined and not
obscured by subcutaneous fat and no co-morbid complications (eg. Diabetes, Hypertension,
Dyslipidemia etc), then the seafarer in question MUST undergo a stress/treadmill test.
If the results of the stress/treadmill test are average or above, seafarer can be considered "fit to
work", however, the seafarer MUST always be counselled on weight loss and ways/means to
improve their health.
BMI MUST also be taken into consideration during the seafarer’s pre-employment medical
examination and each of the Company’s accredited medical clinic have been provided with the
Company’s policy regarding BMI.
In addition to the WHO/ ILO guidelines and national medical standards in the seafarer’s home
country, the Company has also established medical standards with regards to:
Wherever the seafarers test results regarding any of the issues above fall outside of expected
norms, the medical clinic refers the seafarer’s situation back to the Fleet Personnel Dept who will
review, and where necessary, secure clearance from the vessel’s P&I Club, prior to making a
decision on whether or not, the seafarer can be given “fit to work”.
All seafarers engaged under contracts of employment onboard Wallem managed vessels are
expected to follow Company as well as national and international rules and regulations.
The Company does not wish to initiate disciplinary action against any seafarer onboard and
believes that through reasonable dialogue, such issues can be resolved without further need to
escalate the disciplinary action process.
Masters & Chief Engineers must always strive to achieve an amicable resolution to such issues,
however, when dialogue fails to achieve the desired results, contravention of Company rules
onboard the ships follows a simple disciplinary process:
- VERBAL WARNING (preferably in front of a witness who is the same nationality as the errant
seafarer) whereby the seafarer is verbally made aware of the infringement, made aware of what
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 12 -
the Company’s rules, regulations, expectations are and the consequences of contravening the
same again in the future;
- failure to heed such a verbal warning results in a WRITTEN WARNING whereby the seafarer is
now formally made aware of the infringement, and again, made aware of what the Company’s
rules, regulations, expectations are and the consequences of contravening the same again in the
future;
- such a written warning is to be served to the erring seafarer in the presence of two witnesses
(preferably of the same nationality as the seafarer who has committed the offence) and written
warnings are to be noted in the ship’s Official Log Book by the Master together with the
signatures of the witnesses;
- failure to heed the written warning will result in a disciplinary hearing whereby the seafarer is now
served written NOTICE that a DISCIPLINARY HEARING will be convened (stating date, time and
place and giving details of the offence committed) by the Master in the presence of the seafarer’s
Head of Department and other witnesses, who where possible, should be of the same nationality
as the seafarer who has committed the offence. Serving of this notice must be witnessed by 2
witnesses and details entered into the ship’s Official Log Book;
- in the notice of disciplinary hearing, it must be made clear to the seafarer, that has committed the
offence, that he has the option to bring along a colleague who may be allowed to speak on the
seafarer’s behalf. It should also be mentioned that at the end of the hearing, the Master will make
a decision regarding the seafarer’s future stay onboard the ship;
- during the DISCIPLINARY HEARING, the Master must clearly explain the charge leveled against
the seafarer, permit the seafarer or his appointed spokesperson to speak in his defence, take the
statements of independent witnesses and ensure that a full transcript of records (minutes of the
hearing) are maintained;
- once all evidence and statements have been heard, the Master must make a DECISION
regarding the seafarer’s future stay onboard the ship. This decision must be announced during
the hearing and recorded as part of the minutes of the hearing. These minutes must be signed
by all persons present during the hearing. If any person refuses to sign, such refusal must also be
witnessed; &
- finally, brief details of the disciplinary hearing are to be entered in the ship’s Official Log Book.
Master must prepare accurate records of all steps taken for reference at a later date. Copies of
all log book entries, original written warnings, the original disciplinary hearing notice, the original
minutes of the disciplinary hearing and any original witness statements.
These documents are to be sent to the Fleet Personnel Manager from the next convenient port in
order that the Company is in a position to defend itself and the owner/customer from any claims
of unfair dismissal levied by the seafarer.
Master is free to seek advice from the Fleet Personnel Manager at any time during the process.
Wallem understands that Human Element failures cannot be completely eradicated from a
complex process such as ship operation.
Our processes, procedures and training seek to reduce both the number of such incidents and
the severity of their impact.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 13 -
The way in which we respond following a Human Element failure is very important for the future
safety of our ships and people.
The extremes of "No blame culture" and "Zero tolerance culture" will not take Wallem where it
needs to go.
A "Just Culture" is founded on two principles, which apply to everyone in the Company:-
a) Human error, to some degree, is inevitable and the Company policies, processes and
interfaces must be continually monitored and improved to remove such errors:
b) Individuals should be accountable for their actions if they knowingly violate safety
procedures or policies of the Company.
Based on the philosophy of "just Culture" company has developed a flow chart, which will be used
to assure just treatment of all Wallem seafarers.
Our objective is to ensure a uniform approach towards the handling of cases, that have resulted
in an incident or accident. A swift and transparent process is required when dealing with such
cases. Evidence, reports, etc. are to be kept in Fleet Personnel database.
After completing a thorough investigation of the incident we shall follow the "Just Culture"
procedures in order to identify the actions to be taken.
Based on the investigation report Phase 1 of the process flow chart is to be followed. Phase 1 will
ensure that all cases are treated with the same scrutiny, consistency and objectivity to guarantee
a fair review has taken place. The same approach will be followed, regardless of the rank and
nationality of the seafarer in question.
In every case, regardless of final outcome, a written report is to be prepared and filed for the
purpose of accident prevention, ongoing awareness and further training.
If the Human Element failure results from negligent error, reckless violation of Wallem process
and procedure or deliberate sabotage or Malevolent Act, it will have disciplinary consequences for
the person involved.
The consequences may be a poor grade at appraisal, a written warning (4.18.4 of Fleet
Personnel Manual) or Dismissal (4.18.9 of Fleet Personnel Manual).
SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL- PART I Rev.No. / Date : May 2013
Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 14 -
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 15 -
There have been several cases in the past where seafarers onboard have not been able to
produce documentation showing that the FLAG STATE is recognizing their NATIONAL certificate
of competency.
Whilst it is the responsibility of the Fleet Personnel Dept and the Manning Agent to ensure that
seafarers have the right and complete documentation, it falls under the Master's responsibility to
verify that ALL of the seafarers onboard actually fulfill the flag state's requirements in this respect.
Master MUST therefore verify that ALL documentation is complete and valid at the time of the
seafarer's joining AND PRIOR TO THE OFF SIGNING SEAFARER BEING RELEASED FROM
THE VESSEL.
Missing or expiring documents can result in major port state control problems; at worst resulting
in unnecessary and unacceptable delays and detentions.
Every time a new crewmember joins the ship, Master is required to send a written confirmation to
the FPD Crewing Supervisor in charge of the vessel (in FP Hong Kong or Mumbai) that:
- the Master has personally checked with each new joiner, that all relevant documentation is valid
and complete; &
- if any seafarer arrives without complete documentation, this is reported immediately to the
Crewing Supervisor in charge of the vessel (in either FP HK or Mumbai) with Cc to the Fleet
Personnel Manager. FPD will then check and update the Master as soon as possible.
Masters MUST ensure that these instructions form part of the handover notes presented to the
next incoming Master.
The Company recognises that seafarers will be required to sail onboard vessels registered in
countries other than their own country of nationality and therefore MUST be in possession of the
appropriate documentation as required by the flag state of the vessel.
In almost all cases such documentation is issued based on equivalency wherein the flag state
recognises the certificates and/or licences issued to the seafarer.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 16 -
All employment agreements (Company form or per as national requirements) are to be produced
in English.
Both parties (Company and the seafarer) MUST have signed the employment agreement.
Prior to signing, the seafarer must be given an opportunity to examine the agreement and seek
clarification on any aspects of the agreement that they do not understand. This is to ensure that
the seafarers have freely entered into such an employment agreement with sufficient
understanding of their rights and responsibilities.
The Company (can be kept on file by the manning agency) and the seafarer must each retain a
signed original employment agreement.
Any Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) covering the vessel shall form part of a seafarer’s
employment agreement. A copy of all employment agreements and CBAs shall be available with
the both the Master and the Company in order that they are accessible for review by the seafarer,
a competent authority and the port state.
Seafarers shall be given a document containing a record of their employment (rank and dates of
signing on and off the vessel) prior to their disembarkation. This will usually take the form of
entries into the Seaman’s Book. If the seafarer is not in possession of a Seaman’s Book, the
Master may issue a certificate of service (in certain cases, national forms may apply).
It is MUST that prior to their joining, each seafarer holds a valid medical certificate, in English,
attesting that the seafarer is medically fit to perform the duties that they are to carry out at sea.
Medical fitness examinations are to be carried out by a duly qualified medical practitioner licensed
at the place of examination and/or who is recognized by the competent authority at the place of
inspection.
Validity of medical certificates including certificate issued for colored vision should be as per the
requirement of Flag State of the vessel.
In cases of seafarers with pre-existing illness(es) who require special dietary requirements or to
bring maintenance medication onboard, the FPD will send instructions to the Master in advance
or at the time of the seafarer’s joining.
Master and other senior officers are to comply with any instructions issued by the FPD regarding
a seafarers with pre-existing illness(es).
If the period of validity of the medical certificate expires during the course of a voyage, the
certificate remains valid until the next port of call where the seafarer can obtain a medical
certificate from a qualified medical practitioner, provided that this period does not exceed 3
months.
Masters MUST keep the FPD updated regarding any expiring medical certificates onboard as
such issues may influence the FPD’s relief planning.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 17 -
All seafarers are to be paid for their work monthly in accordance with their Contract of
Employment & Addendum (as may be appropriate).
As per MLC 2006 – Reg 2.4, paid leave is an “entitlement” and NOT compensation for work
performed onboard. As such, it is considered that paid leave can be excluded from the monthly
payment of wages as mentioned in MLC Standard A2.2.2, accumulated onboard and paid at the
time of the seafarer’s disembarkation from the vessel.
Entitlement for payment commences from the date of departure from the seafarers point of hire
with the intention to join the vessel.
Entitlement for payment ceases from the date of arrival at the seafarers point of hire, unless the
seafarer signs off on medical grounds and is hospitalised, wherein, basic wages are applied from
the date the seafarer disembarks the vessel until the date of arrival at the seafarers point of hire.
Part months are paid on a pro-rata basis. For calculation purposes, a calendar month is taken to
contain thirty (30) days.
Seafarer’s shall be given a monthly statement of their wage account including any appropriate
deductions.
Seafarers are permitted to make one home allotment/remittance from the vessel per month. This
remittance will be effected with no charge to the seafarer.
Any additional remittances in the same month will be charged at the prevailing bank telegraphic
transfer rate plus bank charges.
As part of their pre-departure briefing, seafarers are to be encouraged, for safety & security reasons,
not to retain large amounts of cash onboard the ship. As an alternative to keeping cash onboard, the
seafarer can choose to either:
The message will be automatically distributed for review, approval and final arrangement of
remittance.
Requests for CTM MUST have the CTM Requisition spreadsheet attached (latest version can be
obtained from WSM Accounts) indicating:
Master MUST make CTM requisition 7 to 10 days prior to vessel's arrival, thus enabling WSM
Accounts to arrange the remittance timely.
Master should refrain from making CTM requests for ports where it is known to be risky for cash
delivery or ports where it is known that high telegraphic transfer commissions apply.
In situations where CTM cannot be arranged and the vessel has offsigning seafarers, these
seafarers can be assured that the Company can arrange to settle their Final Balance of Wages
(FBOW) in US$ once they return to their home country.
Once onboard, CTM MUST be safely retained under lock/key/combination in the ship’s safe.
Masters are reminded that when a new vessel enters management, WSM HK FP will ask the
Master for the details of the ship’s safe including any combination.
There have been a number of cases in the past where the outgoing Master hasn’t passed over
the details of the combination to the incoming Master, or the Master has misplaced the safe
combination details and by keeping updated records on file, WSM HK FP has been able to assist.
WSM HK FP will annually request all vessels for an update regarding the details of the ship’s safe
including any combination, however, Masters can assist by updating whenever:
It is a requirement that the key(s) for the ship’s safe be in the possession of the Master at ALL times
and not left unattended, i.e. lying in a drawer.
Imprudent storage of cash outside of the ship’s safe or careless handling of safe key(s)/combination
by the Master is NOT covered by insurance.
In the event of any uninsured loss of Company cash, Master’s WILL be held personally liable to
reimburse the Company.
The Master maintains an account of wages onboard which records the seafarer’s earnings, any
deductions, allotments made, etc during the month.
No seafarer should be allowed to advance any amount of money that exceeds the amount presently
contained in his onboard account.
The Company strongly discourages personal loans between seafarers and should any loan
agreements be made between two or more seafarers onboard, such loans must NEVER be
processed through the Master’s accounts onboard.
The Company does not bear any responsibility should a seafarer default on any loan agreement
made.
The Company has placed onboard its own Fleet Portage Bill Software which is to be used for:
o Home Allotments;
o Overtime; &
o Cash Advances.
The seafarer’s Account of Wages Report MUST be printed onboard and signed by each individual
seafarer as appropriate. This MUST be sent by courier to the office together with any supporting
vouchers relating to the above mentioned reports. Seafarer’s shall be given a monthly statement
of their wage account including any appropriate deductions.
The Master is held personally liable for any overpayments or non deductions. Whilst the Company
will endeavour to recover said amounts from the seafarer(s) in question, the Master remains
indebted to the Company until such time that the full amount of over payment has been recovered.
Bonus payments are gratuities from the ship owner and/or the charterer and are paid at their
DISCRETION; they ARE NOT part of the seafarer’s salary and the seafarer’s have no rights
whatsoever to demand bonus payments.
Just because a charterer may pay a hold cleaning bonus after a particular voyage, the next
voyage may fall under a different charterer who may choose not to pay any hold cleaning bonus,
in such a case, the Master and the seafarers have NO RIGHT to ask the owner/charterer
regarding a hold cleaning bonus, in fact such action creates a great deal of bad feeling between
the charterer, owner and the vessel.
If a bonus is paid, receive it graciously, if not accept the fact and move on.
Despite Wallem's clear instructions to all senior officers, we are still experiencing cases where
Masters are deeply offending both vessel’s owners and the charterers by asking the charterers
directly for a hold cleaning bonus, special work allowances, etc.
The Company have made it clear on numerous occasions during Fleet Officer Meetings or during
pre-departure briefings with the senior officers, that there is a huge cultural difference between
Asia and the west when it comes to the subject of bonus payments.
In Asia, people understand that bonus payments are "the normal" meaning the traditional way to
"top up" the salary of the workers, however, this is not the case in western countries and in many
countries/industries, bonuses are not paid.
Seafarers MUST understand this difference and also appreciate that western people become
very upset when they receive requests for bonuses as they feel that the ship's staff are being paid
a fair wage for a fair day's work, therefore why are they asking for extra?
The Company appreciates that ship's staff may see this differently, especially around the time of
holiday seasons/festivals when everyone would like some more money in their pockets, however,
asking for a bonus of any kind is NOT acceptable and must not be done!!!!
Repeats of the same in the future will lead to disciplinary action against the seafarer concerned.
Based on Owners approval, chief steward allowance can be paid to an individual or apportioned as
per the tariff below to any seafarer that undertakes the respective task.
This allowance is paid to cover additional duties/responsibilities relating to the Catering Department
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2015
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 20 -
which fall outside of the routine job description for such staff.
For seafarers that undertake the respective tasks and receive the additional allowance, NO
additional overtime shall be simultaneously earned for performing the same task.
Payment awarded as per above tariff MUST be reflected in the Fleet Portage Bill under the
respective seafarer’s earnings column.
NB – the allowance for the laundering of linen onboard DOES NOT fall under the Chief Steward
Allowance.
The Company recognises the need for a systematic approach to evaluation of sea staff’s
performance, training needs, suitability for advancement and re-employment, therefore, the
following guidelines have been established.
The Company uses only one form for sea staff performance appraisal, the Seafarer’s Appraisal
Report (DE-17). The original of which is to be sent to the Fleet Personnel Dept, either HK or
Mumbai as appropriate. A copy always being retained onboard the ship for future reference.
The Fleet Personnel Dept will ensure that the appraisal report is uploaded into ShipMate (our
Crewmanagement database), thereby making it available for viewing by all other
interested/concerned parties, i.e. technical departments, manning agencies, Wallem
Representatives and training centres.
Appraisal Reports form an integral part of a seafarer’s de-briefing upon their return home,
(discussion re performance, areas for improvement, training needs, etc) therefore prompt
reporting, submission and circulation of appraisal reports are critical.
- Masters, when sending crew change details, to ensure that an appraisal report is made; &
- Tech Superintendents, when introducing senior officer candidates, to ensure that an appraisal
report is made for the senior officer scheduled to disembark.
The Master will complete the evaluation of Deck Officers, the Chief Engineer and the staff of the
Catering Dept. It is recommended that the Master discuss the evaluation of the Deck Officers
with the Chief Officer as may be appropriate.
As the Master is generally not sufficiently knowledgeable to comment on the technical knowledge
& skill of the Chief Engineer, any appraisal must be based on the Chief Engineer’s conduct,
attitude, judgement, leadership, co-operation and willingness to train junior staff.
The Chief Engineer will complete the evaluation of the Engineer Officers. It is recommended that
the Chief Engineer discuss the evaluation of the Engineer Officers with the Second Engineer as
may be appropriate.
The Chief Officer in conjunction with the Master and the Second Engineer in conjunction with the
Chief Engineer will complete the evaluation of Deck & Engine Ratings respectively.
Superintendents visiting or sailing with the vessel are required to report on all Senior Officers
onboard and following a sailing visit, are required to report on all Officers and Cadets onboard.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page - 21 -
Whenever there is a change of Senior Officer, the Superintendent in conjunction with the
Technical Fleet Manager must, preferably just before sign off or immediately following
disembarkation, complete an appraisal report. Such reports are to be passed to the FPD for
uploading into ShipMate.
Substantial importance is given to the evaluation of Junior Officers as these are the Company’s
Senior Officers of the future. Officer’s are to be evaluated:
Appraisal of Ratings is to be carried out every 6 months (end March and end September) and
prior to the Rating’s disembarkation from the vessel. Common sense must apply here and if a
Rating is due to end contract within +/- 1 month of the end March and end September, then one
appraisal report will suffice.
In ALL cases when making an appraisal, training needs MUST be reviewed and noted on the
appraisal report form. Vessel’s have been provided with latest updates of training matrices.
Where a seafarer fails to meet expectations, the FPD is responsible for review, initiating and
seeing through the appropriate corrective/preventive action which may include, but is not limited
to:
- message to the Master that either he or the Chief Engineer (or both), counsel the seafarer with a
view to future improvement which must include training, supervision, re-evaluation etc. This
discussion must also make clear, the consequences of not meeting the company’s expectations
following a period of corrective/preventive action;
- message to the manning agency/Wallem Representative that they counsel the seafarer with a
view to future improvement which must include training, etc. This discussion must also make
clear, the consequences of not meeting the company’s expectations following a period of
corrective/preventive action; &
- in extreme cases, a message informing all concerned parties (as appropriate) that the seafarer in
question is to be considered not suitable for re-employment with the Company (NTBR). A copy of
which is to be made available in ShipMate.
When considering whether or not a seafarer should be made NTBR, the following must be taken
into account:
- length of service with the Company and standard of past appraisals on file;
- further discussion with the Tech superintendent or Marine superintendent making the report;
- following discussions with the seafarer themselves or feedback from the Wallem Representative
or Manning Agent, a judgement as to whether or not training will assist or the seafarer alone can
make the necessary changes in order to achieve the expected standard; &
The final decision with regards to making a seafarer NTBR (Not to be Rehired) or reversing an
earlier NTBR decision rests solely with the Fleet Personnel Director.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 22 -
The Company recognises the need for a systematic approach to career development and
promotion, and will, as far as practicable ensure that promotions from within the fleet are carried
out wherever conditions allow.
Senior Officers onboard are to encourage Officers and Ratings to obtain higher grade licences
and certificates of competency as soon as they have sufficient seagoing experience to do so.
Senior Officers onboard are also required to encourage Officers and Ratings to study the duties
and responsibilities of the next higher rank so as to be ready for promotion when the opportunity
arises.
Senior officers are encouraged to assist in the personal development of staff seeking promotions
to higher positions.
The following factors will be taken into account when giving consideration to a seafarer’s
promotion:
The Company’s promotion criteria for officers & engineers is given below:
- for a 3/O to be considered for promotion to 2/O, a minimum of 12 months actual sea service as
3/O is required, at least 6 months of which must have been served on the type of vessel where
vacancy is available;
- for a 2/O to be considered for promotion to C/O, a minimum of 15 months actual sea service as
2/O is required, at least 12 months of which must have been served on the type of vessel where
vacancy is available;
- for a C/O to be considered for promotion to Master, a minimum of 24 months actual sea service
as C/O is required, 12 months of which must be after securing his Class 1 licence, and at least 12
months of the minimum 24 months must have been served on the type of vessel where vacancy
is available; &
- for a 4/E to be considered for promotion to 3/E, a minimum of 12 months actual sea service as
4/E is required, at least 6 months of which must have been served on the type of vessel where
vacancy is available;
- for a 3/E to be considered for promotion to 2/E, a minimum of 15 months actual sea service as
3/E is required, at least 12 months of which must have been served on the type of vessel where
vacancy is available;
- for a 2/E to be considered for promotion to Chief Engineer, a minimum of 24 months actual sea
service as 2/E is required, 12 months of which must be after securing his Class 1 licence, and at
least 12 months of the minimum 24 months must have been served on the type of vessel where
vacancy is available.
Recommendations for promotion are to be reviewed by the Fleet Personnel Manager or the
Operations Manager (Mumbai) in conjunction with the Fleet Personnel Director and the Technical
Dept as required.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 23 -
Following promotion, a probationary period of at least 3 months applies. Following the successful
completion of the probationary period, the promotion will be confirmed, however if the Head of
Dept onboard feels that the seafarer has not met the requirements of the higher rank or that he
requires further evaluation time, then this will be discussed with the Fleet Personnel Dept and a
further course of action decided.
The Company recognises the need for effective relief planning which includes planning for future
manning needs, long term relief planning, planning for new ships entering management and, the
communication of such plans within the Company, to our manning agencies, the Master and the
seafarer’s involved.
Relief planning is an ongoing process and to ensure that future manning needs can be met, the
FPD ensures that staff succession and recruitment planning is conducted which includes profiling
of competence and experience.
The ShipMate crew management system notifies users at specific time periods (normally 3
months, 2 months and 1 month) before a seafarer onboard is scheduled to complete contract.
Relief planning is to be conducted giving sufficient time for training, medical examination, visa
applications (as may be appropriate) and pre-departure briefing, etc.
Vessel’s operations, port rotation and cost effectiveness must always be taken into account when
planning reliefs, therefore good communication with the vessel and the Technical Dept is
essential.
- Master & Chief Engineer are not to be replaced at the same time;
- Master & Chief Officer are not to be replaced at the same time;
- Chief Engineer & 2nd Engineer are not to be replaced at the same time;
- in order to maintain continuity onboard, no more than 50% of the seafarers in any single
department (deck officers, engineers, deck ratings and engine ratings) are to be replaced at the
same time; &
- no seafarer (except a Cadet/Trainee securing sea time for a higher licence examination) should
under normal circumstances be engaged for any longer than 12 months onboard a Company
managed vessel. This also applies where extensions of contract are applied for.
For operational reasons, where the above requirements cannot be complied with, the issue must
be discussed ahead of time with the Technical Dept concerned.
It is always preferred that prior to a seafarer leaving the vessel, his future Date of Availability has
been established and passed back to the FPD in order to assist with long term planning.
In addition to the above, where a seafarer’s next vessel assignment is known or has been
planned, FPD must pass this information to the seafarer through the Master prior to the
seafarer’s disembarkation as this will assist the seafarer with his own vacation plan thereby
allowing sufficient time for training, medical examination, visa applications (as may be appropriate)
and pre-departure briefing, etc prior to his next assignment.
ALL seafarers are expected to complete the service period for which they have been contracted,
however, there are circumstances where early termination or extension of contract may be
requested.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 24 -
Requests for an extension of contract MUST be submitted through the Master no later than 2
months before the due date of contract completion. All requests for extension MUST have been
reviewed and approved by the Head of the Department.
When requests are received through the Master regarding a seafarer’s possible extension of
contract, the FPD are responsible for checking to see if there are equally competent and
experienced seafarers awaiting assignment before reviewing the request.
If active seafarers are on leave, awaiting assignment, priority is to be given to well reported
seafarers who have completed their vacation in order that good quality seafarers are retained
within the Company’s pool. FPD will then respond to the seafarer making the request for contract
extension.
Once an extension has been approved, the Company has the right to cancel or cut short the
extension period at its discretion based on operational convenience, i.e. ships leaving
management meaning excess seafarers in the manning pool or a cost effective port for crew
change.
In cases where a seafarer has their contract extension cut short, once the seafarer has been
onboard beyond their original end of contract date, such a seafarer would be deemed to have
ended their contract.
A seafarer may seek early termination of their contract, however, any expenses related to their
premature repatriation and the joining of their reliever will be dealt with as per the conditions
stated in their contract of employment or the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) covering the
vessel.
The Company recognises the need for a sufficient handover period between seafarers joining
and those disembarking from vessels. Therefore, when planning replacements, the following
shall be factored into planning where practicable:
In addition to the above, specific ranks should cover the following as part of their handover:
- Master to observe at least one manoeuvring operation as well as one port turn around*;
- Chief Officer to understudy one cargo operation – onboard tankers, this must be a discharge
operation, whereas onboard a dry cargo vessel, this could be a cargo loading or discharge
operation*; &
- Chief or Second Engineer to observe one port turn around and wherever possible, at least one
manoeuvring operation*.
- * This can be deviated from if the joining officer is not newly promoted or joining on his first
contract with the company and if having ships type specific experience in the ranking he is joining.
- Second Officer to observe at least one full cargo watch operation and complete the passage
plan to the vessel’s next port*; &
- Third Engineer, Third Officer & Fourth Engineer to observe at least one full cargo watch
operation*.
- * This can be deviated from if the joining officer is not newly promoted or joining on his first
contract with the company and if having ships type specific experience in the ranking he is joining.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 25 -
In addition to the above, planning is to ensure that the outgoing Master, Chief Engineer and Chief
Officer only disembark immediately before the vessel’s departure (at the same time as the local
agent hands over port clearance).
However, it is appreciated that in some countries, immigration laws require that the disembarking
seafarer must have left the country before vessel's departure. In such cases, local immigration
laws must be followed.
In cases where a senior officer is serving his first contract with the company or is newly promoted
into the rank, the following may also be carried out in order to ensure that the officer is best
prepared for assuming his new position onboard:
Where, for operational reasons, the above handover period cannot be complied with, the issue
shall be discussed ahead of time with the Technical Dept concerned and especially in the case of
officers, more thorough handover notes are to be prepared by the offsigner and consideration is
to be given to the four additional items listed above in order to mitigate the risk.
In order to make these pre-departure briefings more effective, senior officers are required to
submit, by email, several days in advance of arrival at the port of handover, their “handover
notes” to the vessel’s Technical Superintendent & Fleet Personnel Supervisor.
Handover notes are then reviewed and a copy is passed by the Fleet Personnel Supervisor to the
officer assigned to join (sometimes through his manning agent/centre) and possibly the local
WMTC, in order that during the officer’s pre-departure briefing, the person carrying out the
briefing can review, comment on, clarify and emphasise some of the onboard issues as
mentioned in the handover notes.
Handover notes are to be written in English, typed whenever possible, however, if handwritten,
ensure that the handwriting is clear and readable.
7.29 REPATRIATION (MLC 2006, Regulation 2.5) & ENTITLEMENT TO LEAVE INCLUDING
SHORE LEAVE (MLC 2006, Regulation 2.4)
Where the vessel is covered by a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), the Company will
ensure that the terms of the CBA regarding repatriation are complied with.
Where the vessel is not covered by a CBA, the Company will ensure that the seafarer’s terms
and conditions of employment clearly specify:
Because of visa issues and legal liabilities (compensation claims) etc, seafarers will be
repatriated directly to their point of hire.
The Company DOES NOT require seafarers to make any advance payment to the cost of their
repatriation at the beginning of their employment.
In addition, the Company WILL NOT recover the cost of repatriation from the seafarer except
where it has been found that the seafarer has been in serious default of the seafarer’s
employment obligations.
As per MLC 2006, Reg 2.4, paid leave is an “entitlement” and NOT compensation for work
performed onboard. As such, it is considered that paid leave can be excluded from the monthly
payment of wages as mentioned in MLC Standard A2.2.2, and accumulated onboard and paid at
the end of the contracted term.
This is clearly mentioned on the seafarer’s employment agreement as well as in the terms and
conditions of employment (where applicable).
In addition, the Company also recognises the right of the seafarer to be granted shore leave in
order to benefit their health and well being, provided that shore leave periods falls within the
operational requirements of their position as well and national, local as well as port, berth or
terminal regulations.
All joining/repatriating air travel arrangements are made by the FP Dept in either HK or Mumbai
using either WSM’s or owner’s accredited travel service provider(s) as may be appropriate.
Seafarers are NOT authorised to make any travel arrangements on the Company’s account
without specific written authorisation from the FP Dept.
All joining seafarers are to be offered a travel advance of US$50/- prior to their departure from
their homeport.
This travel advance is to be used where the seafarer requires funds whilst travelling, i.e:
Seafarers taking the US$50 travel advance MUST sign a Travel Advance Voucher, a copy of
which will be hand carried onboard and presented to the Master as part of the seafarer’s pre-
joining documentation.
Master will deduct US$50 from the seafarer’s wage account unless the seafarer can produce
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 27 -
receipts for any genuine expenditure whilst travelling which can be legitimately charged to the
Company account, in which case the seafarer will have these costs refunded.
Air travel will be by economy class and normal baggage allowance will be 30 kg (MLC 2006 –
Guideline B2.5.1.3 (d).
Some airlines may offer a higher baggage allowance and this will be passed on for the benefit of
seafarers, however, company will not be responsible for payment of any charges for baggage
exceeding 30 kg.
Seafarers being repatriated WILL be routed to their point of hire by the most direct route.
Because of visa restrictions and legislation holding the employer liable for medical and any other
expenses should the seafarer suffer injury or illness (even where seafarers have signed a Letter
of Indemnity), requests from seafarers to either “stay over” in the country of disembarkation or
“stop over” in another country on their way home will NOT be entertained.
In the event of a seafarer joining the vessel and his baggage having been misplaced during the
flight and not delivered during the vessel’s stay at the port of joining, then the seafarer would be
entitled to receive an inconvenience allowance of US$200 to buy items of immediate necessity.
Master shall co-ordinate with the local port agent in order that the seafarer be provided with
assistance to enable him to buy the items of immediate necessity.
In addition, Master MUST inform the FPD and the local agent immediately regarding the
seafarer’s lost baggage claim and if possible provide a copy of the claim document(s) filed at the
airport.
FPD will work closely with the Company’s accredited travel service provider in order to trace the
missing baggage and wherever possible have it delivered onboard prior to the vessel’s departure.
In the event, of the seafarer’s luggage not being traced, the seafarer would be compensated for
the loss of his baggage as per IATA regulations and the US$200 paid earlier would be adjusted
against the said IATA payment.
When joining or leaving a vessel and being accommodated in a hotel on Company account, the
following guidelines MUST be followed:
- Company will provide room with meals. If meals are not provided in the hotel, the Company will
arrange a suitable daily subsistence allowance;
- ALL purchases from the hotel mini bar will be for the seafarer’s account;
- If the stay in the hotel extends beyond 3 days, the seafarer may avail of laundry services on the
Company account. However, for a duration of stay of less than 3 days, laundry services will be for
the account of the seafarer;
- Pay per view movies will be for the account of the seafarer;
- Alcoholic beverages will be for the account of the seafarer; &
- Telephone calls/Internet usage (unless business related) will be for the account of the seafarer.
It is requested that upon check out from the hotel, the seafarer arranges to settle ALL expenses on
their personal account in cash or by credit card.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2015
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 28 -
Cost of victualing for family members sailing onboard will be borne by the Owner, through the
ship’s operating expenses (opex) budget. Master must account for all meals taken onboard by
family members as “extra meals” as part of the monthly victualing accounts.
It is also a requirement for family members to hold all necessary visas regardless of the vessel's
trading pattern, i.e:
such visas shall be obtained in advance of the family joining and the cost shall be on the Officer's
account.
Assistance to obtain such visas will be provided by the manning agency and the FP Dept.
Seafarers are responsible/accountable for the behaviour/conduct of their family members at all
times whilst visiting/staying onboard.
Any contravention of Company rules/regulations will result in the family members being asked to
leave the vessel.
7.33 VISITORS
No female visitors, apart from the Officers' wives, and daughters are to be allowed onboard after
sunset, unless the Company's permission is obtained.
Senior Officers onboard are to ensure that ALL seafarers are properly dressed at ALL times.
When working on deck, in the engine room, around the accommodation or in the storerooms or
refrigeration chambers, etc correct personal protective equipment MUST be worn.
Senior Officers MUST confirm with ALL new joining seafarers that they have brought onboard
with them boiler suits and a pair of safety shoes as issued by their manning agency.
The seafarer should be carrying with them as part of their joining documentation, a
Uniform/Working Gear Issue Slip that they have signed prior to departure from their point of
hire, signifying that they have been issued with and tried on for correct size/fit, the items of
uniform/working as appropriate for their rank onboard.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 30 -
Senior officers are to REGULARLY inspect the quality of PPE and ensure that sufficient stock is
available onboard.
Damaged PPE MUST be removed from service and destroyed. Senior officers are to also ensure
that the ship has sufficient stock of PPE at all times.
The sight of officers in clean, smart uniforms creates a very positive first impression for shore
visitors (Customs, Immigration, Local Agent, Ship Supplier, Owner, Charterer, visiting
Superintendent, etc) and when the vessel is alongside, you never know who will visit and when,
therefore when off duty, officers are required to wear uniform at ALL times.
Uniform items are supplied by the company or an allowance is given to enable the officer to
maintain his uniform. Therefore uniform is to be worn as directed by the Master. However,
regardless of Masters instructions, uniform MUST ALWAYS be worn at the following times:
- Deck Officers on the Bridge, when approaching the Pilot station and at any time when the Pilot is
onboard; &
- for all meals taken in the Officer’s Messroom.
The Company gives paramount importance to ensuring the ongoing welfare of the seafarers
serving onboard our managed vessels.
Recreational equipment and material MUST be available onboard, the Company contributes a
fixed amount of money each month which MUST be credited to the Ship's Welfare Fund, in order
to assist with the purchase of such.
The Welfare Fund is intended for the purchase of audio and video disks, magazines, sports
equipment, fishing gear, etc.
However, it must always be borne in mind that the Ship's Welfare Fund is for the benefit of ALL
seafarers onboard and decisions on what to purchase CAN ONLY be made after having held a
meeting to discuss this.
The Welfare Fund account MUST be maintained by an officer (NOT the Master) onboard, and a
statement of all monies coming into the fund and expenditure incurred MUST be made at the end
of each month and posted on the ship's notice board.
Invoices for all expenses will be maintained by the officer in charge of the fund.
It is not necessary that the ship spends full Welfare Fund contribution each month, the ship can
accumulate the Company's welfare contribution towards more expensive purchases, provided
such purchases are agreed following a meeting involving ALL seafarers onboard.
Private letters returned to the Company for re-direction because the seafarer is no longer
onboard the vessel will be returned to the manning agent’s office through which the seafarer
reports.
Seafarers MUST NOT use the Company address as their private mail address.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 31 -
Frequently we receive bank statements, etc with no ship’s name and are therefore unable to
forward. As the contents of such mail is considered important, the Company strongly advises
seafarers to use a contact address in their country of domicile as a permanent contact address.
Considering stricter Custom’s/Security regulations around the world, the Company is only able to
forward personal letters to seafarers onboard.
Parcels containing food, medicines, gifts, magazines, etc will NOT be entertained and shall be
disposed of.
Parcels containing magazines can be sent via the manning agent where they can be passed to
the next batch of joining seafarers to hand carry onboard.
7.38 ONBOARD MESS COMMITTEE (Food & Catering - MLC 2006 – Reg 3.2)
In order to ensure that seafarers have access to good quality food and drinking water and that these
are provided under regulated & hygienic conditions, a Mess Committee MUST be in place onboard
the ship.
In addition to the above, the Mess Committee MUST ensure that the food onboard remains
balanced, healthy, suitable for ALL nationalities (mixed nationality vessels) and within budget.
In order to achieve the above, the Mess Committee MUST ensure that:
- records (delivery notes/receipts) of all provision purchases are maintained and recorded onboard;
- Inspections of food storerooms (including refrigeration spaces) are made at interval of not more
than seven days and recorded;
- quality of drinking water is regularly monitored/tested and recorded;
- expired provisions are identified, removed from potential use and properly disposed of; &
- that at least 14 days of menu plans are available. Daily menus MUST be able to show that the
food available onboard remains balanced, healthy, suitable for ALL nationalities.
The Mess Committee MUST be chaired by the Master and should (wherever possible) include
representatives from the various departments onboard as well as various nationalities.
Normally, the Mess Committee should consist of a minimum of 3 and no more than 6 persons.
Recommended make up is Master as Chairman, 1 Officer (Deck or Engineer), 1 Rating and the
Chief Cook, total 4 persons.
Mess Committee MUST meet at least once per month, or more frequently if required and all
meetings should be minuted to provide a brief record of discussions. Copy of the minutes signed
by all in attendance MUST be placed on a public notice board for all seafarers to read.
The Master is responsible to oversee the activities of the Mess Committee, verify that the vessel
is sufficiently stocked to cover any eventualities and will assist in placing orders and co-ordinating
with suppliers to ensure that provisions are delivered onboard in the most economical manner.
- to ensure that with good planning, optimum use of the allocated resources is made, including
contingency measures such as stocking up on non-perishable items to provide for an unexpected
long stay at anchorage or stoppage at sea;
- to ensure that with proper planning, optimum use is made of the available resources, including
human resources; &
- planning of menus for special occasions, i.e. Diwali, Christmas, New Year or Chinese Spring
Festival.
The Mess Committee must be active in making sure that acceptable standards of victualing are
maintained onboard the vessel at all times. If any seafarer has any doubts or concerns about the
standards onboard, these concerns must be brought to the attention of your Mess Committee
representative and discussed during the regular Mess Committee meetings.
Proper victualing onboard is a shared responsibility and encompasses the most important
elements of life onboard, i.e. health, safety and welfare.
The proper application and verification of victualing funds to each and every seafarer onboard is
key to achieving this.
A number of cases have been reported of mismanagement (basically theft) of the victualing funds
onboard, in some cases leading to discrepancies in the victualing accounts of up to US$5000
onboard one ship.
Neither owners nor insurance will cover such losses, therefore, we are left with no choice but to
"work off" the discrepancy over a period of time, which to the detriment of all onboard, means a
reduction in foodstuffs. Therefore the selfish actions of one or may be two persons negatively
effects all onboard.
Clearly this is grossly unfair to our seafarers and we, as a Company, take such matters very
seriously.
Therefore, it is highly recommended that the Mess Committee appoints one member other than
the Master to assist the Cook with, and verify the month end provision inventory.
Once the month end victualing accounts have been finalised, they MUST be reviewed and
countersigned by ALL the members of the Mess Committee in order to ensure transparency.
Any commissions, rebates or discounts obtained in respect of cash payments to suppliers MUST
be reflected in the victualing accounts in order that such savings can be utilised in the future to
purchase additional foodstuffs which will be to the benefit of ALL seafarers onboard.
The Company shall provide seafarers health protection and medical care, including essential
dental care as comparable as possible to that which is generally available to workers ashore. This
includes prompt access to the necessary medicines, medical equipment and facilities for
diagnosis and treatment and to medical information and expertise.
Seafarers shall be allowed to visit a qualified medical doctor or dentist without delay in ports of call
where practicable.
Seafarers Medical documents shall be maintained confidential and notified only to the company
office.
The Master is the person on board responsible for medical care and he shall make an accurate
assessment of the seafarer’s condition, after which if he thinks that a visit to the Doctor is
required, he MUST make arrangements through the local agent.
the MLC 2006 does not identify any particular treatment – other than ‘essential dental care’ – as
this would be a matter for national laws or regulations.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page - 33 -
Medical Forms: While no particular form is required under the MLC 2006, the third edition of the
International Medical Guide for Ships, 29 published in 2007 by the World Health Organization
(WHO) on behalf of WHO, ILO and IMO, contains the following forms for this purpose in
Annex A:
- A Ship Master’s Report – To be completed by the ship’s master, assisted by the second
officer. This form should be filled in the ship’s medical log and provides a brief but
sufficiently comprehensive record of every medical case managed on board.
- A ship’s identity and navigational status form - to be used when requesting evacuation
of an injured or sick seafarer.
- A patient health status form – providing the most important aspects of the medical
history, medical treatment and other pertinent medical information that should accompany
a patient being evacuated to an on-shore medical facility.
- A primary physician’s report form (REQUEST FOR MEDICAL ATTENTION D-8
FORM) – which an on-shore physician assigned to the care of a sick or injured seafarer
should use to note all pertinent details of the case.
- If the above mentioned forms are available in a prescribed format within the
circulars and marine notices of the flag administration, then that format should be
used to record the items described above.
The completed REQUEST FOR MEDICAL ATTENTION D-8 FORM (D-8) must be sent to the
company.(to Fleet Cell).
The handling of medical repatriation, death onboard or persons missing at sea cases from
vessels under full technical management is a joint effort between the Fleet Personnel and the
Marine Depts.
From the Fleet Personnel perspective, the Fleet Personnel Manager takes charge of the case
and works closely with the Fleet Personnel Supervisor responsible for the vessel, with the Fleet
Cell and Insurance deparments as may be required.
Local medical attention is to be coordinated with the local port agent and the local P&I
Correspondent as may be appropriate.
Once the medically offsigned seafarer has been deemed “fit to travel”, the FP Dept will make the
necessary travel arrangements. If medical support (additional doctor, etc) is required for the
seafarer during the flight then this must be discussed/approved between the owner & P&I Club
prior to flight arrangements being made.
When making flight arrangements for the seafarer and additional doctor (as applicable) visa,
transit visa & destination visa requirements must always be borne in mind.
Any additional support for the seafarer, i.e. wheelchair assistance prior boarding and upon
landing, must be made known to the travel service provider at the time of making the flight
arrangements.
Manning agent is to be regularly updated in order that they can inform the seafarer’s family,
especially with regards to his arrival flight details and meeting arrangements upon arrival.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 34 -
If special arrangements are required for meeting the seafarer upon arrival in his home country,
these must be passed to the local P&I Correspondent there with copy to the manning agency and
owners/customers.
In the unfortunate situation where a seafarer dies onboard the ship or whilst ashore, procedures
as provided above are to be followed and once the body is released by the local authorities,
arrangements for transporting the body home are normally made by the local P&I Correspondent
because of Customs issues, with copy to all concerned parties.
Master must make an inventory of said belongings; have this inventory witnessed by 2
seafarers onboard preferably of the same nationality as the deceased. Original inventory is to be
placed together with the deceased’s belongings prior to sealing the baggage, with a copy retained
onboard, a copy passed to the local port agent to facilitate Custom’s clearance, etc and a copy
sent to the Fleet Personnel Manager.
Fleet Personnel Manager in conjunction with the Master, local port agent and P&I Club local
Correspondent as may be required, is to make all necessary arrangements to return the
seafarer’s personal belongings to his family.
In the unfortunate situation where a seafarer is reported missing at sea presumed dead, the
major difference is that there will be no body to take care of upon arrival next port or return to the
next of kin. The local Police at the first port of arrival following the incident will be involved in order
to establish the cause behind the seafarer going missing.
Also in such a case, there will be no Death Certificate, but a statement from the
Consulate/Embassy based on the nationality of the seafarer, stating that the person is missing at
sea, presumed dead must be obtained. This will need to be arranged for by the local Agent or P&I
Correspondent.
FPD will endeavour to work together with the Flag State authorities in order to get them (the Flag
State authorities) to issue a Death Certificate or equivalent statement that can be provided to the
seafarer’s next of kin.
To assist, a Death Onboard or Missing Persons at Sea checklist (Company Form DE-25)
covering the actions required during such events has been prepared and must be used to ensure
that effective communication is maintained and that no items are over looked.
7.41 DESERTION
The following documents are to be forwarded to the Company in all cases of desertion:
The carriage of contraband, firearms, dangerous weapons, i.e. swords, throwing stars, etc,
explosives, i.e. fireworks and knives (unless required for work onboard, i.e. Chief Cook) is strictly
prohibited.
Seafarer’s should also be aware that in certain countries, very strict penalties (including
imprisonment) apply for the possession of pornographic material on personal computers, mobile
phones, etc.
There have been a number of cases where seafarers have trustingly bought second hand
computers or mobile phones and unbeknown to them, pornographic pictures were lying buried in the
unit’s memory.
In addition to the above, the carriage of domestic pets or other animals (except as cargo) onboard is
also strictly prohibited.
Prior to joining, ALL seafarers have signed a declaration clearly stating that they are aware of the
Company’s policy on such matters.
Any seafarer contravening this policy will have their employment terminated immediately.
7.43 TRADING
Any seafarer contravening this policy will have their employment terminated immediately.
Removal of Company or ship’s property from the vessel without permission of the Master or the
Company constitutes theft.
All seafarers MUST be aware that the Master has been given the right to inspect cabins as well as
the seafarer’s personal baggage at any time during the seafarer’s tenure onboard the ship.
Should such inspection reveal the unauthorised possession of Company or ship’s property, the
seafarer concerned will have their employment terminated immediately.
ALL seafarers are required to comply with regulations made by the local Custom’s Authorities.
Seafarers are required to openly and honestly complete all Custom’s Declarations prior to arrival in
port.
Contravention of this advice constitutes smuggling and any seafarer contravening this policy will
have their employment terminated immediately.
No alterations to the structure, fixtures, fittings and decoration of the ship are to be made without
Master/Chief Engineer’s knowledge and/or Company approval.
No alteration to electrical fittings onboard may be made without the specific permission of the Chief
Engineer.
When personal electrical items are being used within the accommodation (including TVs, music
systems, personal computers, mobile phone chargers, etc) due regard must be made to:
- voltage;
- rating; &
- the number of appliances connected concurrently to one power outlet.
Verification is to be carried out during the Master/Chief Engineer’s weekly inspection of
accommodation and cabin spaces.
When any seafarer suffers total or partial loss of, or damage to, their personal effects whilst serving
onboard as a result of wreck, loss stranding or abandonment of the vessel as a result of fire,
flooding or collision, excluding any loss or damage caused by the seafarer’s own fault or through
theft of misappropriation, the seafarer shall be entitled to receive compensation from the Company
up to a maximum of US$3000.
When filing any claim for lost or damaged property/personal effects, the seafarer shall certify that
any information provided is true to the best of their knowledge.
The majority of Company managed vessels are covered by ITF approved Collective Bargaining
Agreements (CBAs), those not covered are national flag, i.e. owner and flag registered in the
same country.
Therefore the vessel should have no problem with ITF inspectors anywhere in the world.
Company policy is to maintain good relations at all times with ITF and their affiliated unions,
therefore should an ITF inspector or a representative from an ITF affiliated seafarer’s union board
the vessel, Master, officers and ratings are required to be courteous and be co-operative at all
times.
There have been cases in the past where the Master decided to ''send the ITF inspector away''
and did not allow him onboard which made ITF feel (incorrectly of course) that the vessel was
not properly crewed nor well managed and the Master's action aroused too much suspicion.
Masters MUST allow an ITF affiliate/inspector access to the vessel, providing that all ISPS
procedures for visitors have been complied with and the visit in no way affects the safety of the
ship or continuity of shipboard operations.
It is however, VERY important that the Master MUST stay with the ITF affiliated union
representative/inspector AT ALL TIMES when the ITF affiliated union representative /inspector is
onboard.
The Company has no objections to the ITF Representative looking at the Fleet Portage Bill (FPB)
and hours of work/overtime records, however, please note that they are NOT to take away any
photocopies of such records.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 37 -
On all Company managed vessels, our seafarers have signed English language Contracts of
Employment. Again, the Company has no problem with the Master showing the seafarer's
contracts to any ITF affiliate/inspector during his visit onboard, however NO copies are to be
made and retained by the affiliate/inspector.
As a matter of good practice, please always make sure that there are no complaints amongst the
crew which could and should be readily resolved onboard as soon as any problem/grievance
arises.
The Company provides money every month for seafarer's welfare items, Master MUST ensure
that this money is being properly spent on crew welfare and that a Statement of Account showing
what has been purchased and the balance in the account is posted in the Messroom for all
seafarer's to read. This should also be shown to the ITF inspector if required.
If the ITF affiliate union representative/inspector requests to see any documents (Master
need NOT volunteer to show anything unless asked by the ITF affiliate/inspector) the list of
documents given below are those that Master can show if indeed the ITF affiliate/inspector
should they ask to see any documents:
The Company is sure that the vessel is well always maintained, the crew are well fed, properly
paid and in possession of safety gear as required for safe working onboard.
The Company has no objection to an ITF affiliate/inspector walking around the vessel; however,
they MUST be suitably dressed with regards to PPE, i.e. appropriate footwear AND accompanied
by the Master AT ALL TIMES.
In addition, the Company has no objection to an ITF affiliate/inspector holding a meeting with the
seafarers onboard; however, the Master MUST be present throughout the whole meeting.
Following a visit of an ITF affiliate/inspector, for sake of good order Master to send the Fleet
Personnel Dept a report regarding the ITF visit and informing if the ITF affiliate/inspector made
any comments about the ship prior to their disembarkation.
During an ITF visit, if anything is unclear, or if Master wishes to speak to the Fleet Personnel Dept
by phone to clarify any matters, please do not hesitate.
In order to ensure compliance with the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) 2006, the Company
recognises the need for a structured and systematic approach to the resolution of seafarer
originated complaints onboard vessels under our management.
The Company will ensure that a copy of the MLC 2006 Convention in English is kept on board.
The Company also recognises the fact that the ship is the most suitable place for seafarer’s
complaints to be aired, discussed and resolved.
If a seafarer has a complaint related to their rights to decent conditions of work, social security
and welfare, health and safety protection, accident prevention, accommodation and recreational
facilities, sexual harassment, discrimination because of race, colour, religion, sex, national origin,
handicap, age or ancestry - or any other matter related to alleged breaches of common decency,
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 38 -
respect and placement – vessels’ management (Heads of Departments and senior officers) will
contribute to and in case required, also manage and govern the mutual, fair, effective and
expeditious handling of any such complaints.
Such complaints should as far as possible be resolved at the lowest level possible in line of
immediate superiors. However all seafarers shall have a right to pass their grievance directly to
one of the senior officers or to the Master or any competent authority of their choice as descired
under MLC 2006.
For clarity:
Deck Ratings should address their complaint to the Bosun as the senior most Deck Rating, if the
Bosun cannot resolve the issue, the complaint MUST be brought to the attention of the Chief
Officer. If the Chief Officer is unable to resolve the issue, the complaint MUST be brought to the
attention of the Master;
Engine Ratings should address their complaint to the Fitter as the senior most Engine Rating, if
the Fitter cannot resolve the issue, the complaint MUST be brought to the attention of the Second
Engineer. If the Second Engineer is unable to resolve the issue, the complaint MUST be brought
to the attention of the Chief Engineer and/or Master;
Catering Ratings should address their complaint to the Ch/Cook as the senior most Catering
Rating, if the Cook cannot resolve the issue, the complaint MUST be brought to the attention of
the Master;
Deck Officers should address their complaint directly to the Master; whereas
Engine Officers & Electricians, etc should address their complaint directly to the Chief Engineer, if
the Chief Engineer cannot resolve the issue, the complaint MUST be brought to the attention of
the Master.
If the grievance is against Master, all seafarers shall have a right to pass their grievance to chief
engineer or directly to the company.
Seafarers are safeguarded against the possibility of victimization for filing complaints. The term
“victimization” covers any adverse action taken by any person with respect to a seafarer for
lodging a complaint which is not manifestly maliciously made. Lodging a complaint is without
prejudice to the seafarer’s right to seek redress through other appropriate and acceptable means
elsewhere.
Seafarers making any complaint have the right to be accompanied and to be represented by
another seafarer of their choice (mutually agreed between the seafarer and representative)
onboard the ship – to attend any meetings into the subject matter of the complaint.
Officers and/or crew members shall, within five (5) days from the date of the alleged occurrence
of the grievance, bring the matter to their Immediate Supervisor, Department Head, the Master or
his or her appointee, who in the chain of command dealing with the grievance shall have a further
five (5) days each to bring about a solution to the matter, provided that this time limit is
appropriate to the seriousness of the matter.
If the complaint cannot be resolved onboard, the decision of the Master shall govern at sea and in
port with regards to maintaining safety and harmony onboard the vessel until such time as the
complaint has been reviewed and a response has been received from the Company.
The Master shall however, as soon as possible after the meetings onboard failed to resolve the
issue at hand, refer such complaint to the relevant Fleet Personnel Manager (HK, Mumbai,
GmbH, etc) and ensure that the seafarer is made aware that his complaint has been passed on
to the Company, as well as ensuring that the complainant is kept updated as may be required.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 39 -
The Company shall endeavour to resolve the complaint within 15 working days following receipt
and wherever possible, keep the complainant updated through the Master.
ALL complaints and the decisions taken MUST be recorded and for this purpose, the company
has provided Company form DE-38 (Onboard Complaint Record).
Blank copies of this form MUST be made available to the seafarers at a convenient location(s)
within the shipboard accommodation.
Once a final decision has been reached, a copy of the completed DE-38 MUST be provided to
the complainant for their records.
Seafarers MUST recognise and respect that complaints may be unjustified. Unjustified
complaints can be categorised as, but not limited to, those made with the ulterior motive of:
- personal revenge;
- discrediting others;
- highlighting own excellent entirety at the expense of others;
- complaints made in order to have greater personal rights than others and greater personal rights
than can be justified;
- preparing a counteraction for any later expected personal prosecution or reprimand for ones own
negligence or breach of obligations;
- exclusively made for the purpose of demonstrating personal power, self-assertion, self-
satisfaction and self-importance; &
- breaching Company policy.
Any specific arrangements for the implementation of these procedures may be decided by the
management team onboard of each vessel, and will take into account existing policies,
procedures, facilities available and any other circumstances particular to that vessel. However,
any arrangements put in place must be in accordance with the main requirements of this general
procedure for reporting a complaint.
Seafarers MUST be able to observe transparency and uniform enforcement of this procedure, for
which reason the administration of the above mentioned should, as far as possible, be enforced
alike regardless of vessel type.
However nothing in these procedures shall prevent, or impede a vessel’s management from
implementing a more flexible procedure. This could be to resolve a complaint at a lower level
than dictated by this procedure if deemed necessary for well-grounded reasons and because of
legitimate consideration to the well-being of seafarers and to the Head of the Department of the
seafarer or the seafarer’s superior officer.
a. The Complainant (seafarer filing the complaint) or their mutually appointed representative (as
appropriate) MUST complete Part A of Company form DE-38 (Onboard Complaint Record).
c. Once the form has been received by the senior most rating/Head of Department, Chief Engineer
or Master, the recipient MUST sign and date for receipt only. The complaint MUST be reviewed
to ensure that the complaint is justified, the opinion of the Master or a senior officer can be sought
at this time.
d. If the complaint is unjustified, the Complainant and their Representative (if appropriate) MUST be
informed of the reason(s) why and Part A of Company form DE-38 updated.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 40 -
e. If the complaint is justified, a mutually agreeable date shall then be set for a meeting (hearing) in
order to discuss the complaint. This date MUST allow the recipient sufficient time to investigate
the complaint, speak to other persons that may be involved, have a contribution, etc.
f. If, following the initial meeting, the complaint is resolved to the satisfaction of the Complainant,
the Complainant as well as the senior most Rating/Head of Department and the Master is to sign
and date Part B of the form.
g. If, the initial meeting under Part B, involved the senior most Rating and the complaint remains
unresolved to the satisfaction of the Complainant, a further meeting shall be arranged involving
the Head of Department (i.e. Chief Officer, Chief or Second Engineer), if none of these officers
have been involved at an earlier stage of the complaint process. Part B of form DE-38 (a second
sheet) can again be used to record details of this meeting.
h. If, following the meeting as per Part B, the complaint remains unresolved to the satisfaction of the
Complainant, a further meeting shall be arranged involving the Master if the Master has not been
involved at an earlier stage of the complaint process, refer to Part C of form DE-38.
i. If, following the Master’s mitigation meeting, the complaint is resolved to the satisfaction of the
Complainant, the Complainant and Master are to sign and date Part C of the form.
j. If, following the meeting as per Part C, the complaint remains unresolved to the satisfaction of the
Complainant; the Master is now required to refer the complaint to the Company as per Part D.
k. NB – in the case of a justified complaint and regardless of the outcome, Parts A to C must
ALWAYS be completed prior to Company referral.
l. Once the Company’s assessment and recommendation is received, a copy MUST be made
available to the Complainant and the Master MUST make the Complainant aware that if still
unsatisfied, the Complainant has the right to seek redress through other appropriate and
acceptable means elsewhere. The Master MUST then provide the Complainant with the contact
details of a competent authority at the vessel’s Flag State or his home country, details of which
can be obtained from section 7.54.
m. Once the Complaints Procedure is completed, the original of form DE-38 MUST be filed onboard
and kept for a period of not less than two years. There is no requirement for a copy to be sent to
the Company. If a copy is required, it shall be requested on a case by case basis.
n. The contents of this document are to be considered as confidential – and filed and stored
accordingly under the authority of the Master.
o. Port or Flag State inspectors have a legitimate right to be shown the content of this form in order to
ascertain, that the vessel’s management fulfilled the obligations of MLC Regulation 5.1.5.
p. Should the vessel leave the Company’s management within the two year retention period stated
above, the originals of the appropriate forms MUST be forwarded to the Fleet Personnel Dept for
filing.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director FPD
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Checked by : Director FPD
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 41 -
All seafarers will join or leave the vessel on travel arrangements made by the Company. When
travelling by air, economy class travel will be provided with a baggage allowance of 30kg. Any
extra baggage above 30kg will have to be carried at personal expense.
Wives and children are allowed on board in accordance the Rules laid down by the Company ,
subject to the numbers allowed on board not being exceeded, and one place always remaining free
for the company's use.
Officers who wish to bring their families on board must obtain the permission of the Company and
have completed the Company Indemnity form. The Master may make special ruling he considers
necessary for safety and efficient operation of the ship and must consider Port and Terminal
Regulations before granting permission to allow children on board. When children are on board the
Master must ensure that parents maintain proper control of them.
A wife must give a written declaration whilst joining that she is not pregnant and is otherwise fit to
undertake the voyage.
Officers will always be responsible for ensuring that their families are in possession of necessary
travel, health documents and visa's for the country where the vessel is foreseen to trade to. In the
event of vessel calling ports where visa is required and families do not hold the visa then they are to
be signed off at previous port of call. All expenses being to officers account.
The officer and his family are required to issue a letter of undertaking indemnifying the vessels,
Master, officers and crew, Owners, Managers and Charterers for any injury or sickness that they
may incur whilst sailing onboard.
The officers are obliged to pay premium for the insurance cover, which Company arranges for the
families. It is to be made clear that whereas Company will assist in recovery of any claims but will
not be responsible for any claims if the Insurers reject the claim on basis of any exclusion clause in
the Policy.
Schedule of premium is detailed in SMS Documentation DVD, WSM – GENERAL LETTERS. The
schedule is subject to change advice of which will be given to vessel.
Whilst the vessel is in port the officers families may visit the vessel subject to Master's permission
and local regulations.
If Master notices any discrepancy in the documents of onboard crew, he MUST then immidiatetly
inform FPD. FPD will ensure proper handling of such matters and will assist Master in all
possible ways and means. This includes taking necessary dispensation from Flag State, as
required.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 7 Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
PERSONNEL
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Directors
Page - 42 -
2 Black Files removed from SMS & amended contents transferred to SMS DVD.
- Contact information of the MLC representative designated by the Company for handling
onboard complaints:
SECTION 8 TRAINING
8.1 OVERVIEW OF WALLEM TRAINING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
Training Records
1.Record of Courses
2.Familairisation Card WSM Reviews Analysis for Training Needs
3.Personal Record of -Recruiting Centers assessment of statutory training
Training and -Department Heads Reviews of Training Records
Familiarization -Masters review of Record of Training & Familiarization
4.Log Book records -Superintendent’s direct assessment during Audits
5.Appraisal records -Masters/Depart.heads/ Superintendent’s Appraisals.
6.ComputerEvaluation -Appraisals at Training /Recruiting Centres.
7.Cadets Record Book -Computer based analysis of existing knowledge levels. (S.E.T.S)
(Deck and Engine)
** List of all Training courses available at WMTC and their schedule is available on the
Wallem Website. Visit www.wallem.com for obtaining the schedule during the leave period.
SECTION 8
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
TRAINING
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I
Page -2- Approved by : Managing Director
In addition to the above-mentioned videos, vessels are from time to time, supplied with
various equipment’s operational and/or maintenance videos.
ii) Books:
WALLEM has a standard list of publications to be maintained based on vessel
type and vessel trading pattern. Many of these books are required to be carried
as per statutory requirement. However, these books are also an useful tool in
training of officers and crew. Refer to general letter 68 in safety section of
General letter II for details.
In addition, some reference books are provided as follows for training of officers
and crew.
- Tanker Operations Reference Books.
- Bulk Carrier Practice.
- Reefer Manual
- For Tanker Operations:
1. Measuring Cargo
2. Heating Cargo
3. Pumping Cargo
4. Tank Cleaning
5. Various tanker Specific Industry standard books.
- Training and Maintenance Manual for Life Saving Appliances.
- Safety / Loss Prevention Guides- Personal Injury prevention.
- Publications from P & I Clubs.
* (“All” does not include certain vessels where Owners do not approve supplying such training aids)
The Company encourages each category of Officer to guide and professionally train his juniors.
When deemed necessary senior officers who are soon to be taking charge as Master or Chief
Engineer shall overlap with their predecessor to learn the specific of vessel and/or trade.
Further to section 5.6.3 and depending on vessels trading pattern and budgetary constraints, a
Company Training Supdt will normally attend each vessel at intervals of 1 to 2 years for a
Training Voyage or lengthy port stays. This will be a follow on to and in conjunction with the
Internal Audits. The Training would require 3 to 5 days in addition to time for Safety Audit. Total
time on board Is therefore is about 6 to 10 days for both Safety Audit and Training.
Syllabus for training will include but is not limited to Accident Prevention, Fire Prevention,
Emergency Response Procedures, Fire Fighting Techniques, Enclosed space Entry, Rescue
Resuscitation & First Aid Cargo Hazards, Breathing Apparatus, Fixed and Portable Safety
Equipment, Abandon Ship Procedure/ Man Overboard, Survival at Sea, Use and Maintenance of
Equipment, Safety in Cargo Handling, Tank Fires and Explosions, Hazardous Properties of
hydrocarbons. Pyrophoric Scale, Inert Gas Operation, Gas Detection Equipment and Tank
Atmosphere Control, Ship/Shore Interface, Pollution Avoidance, Marpol compliance, security
procedures etc.
SECTION 8
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
TRAINING Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2010
MANUAL- PART I
Page -3- Approved by : Managing Director
Lectures and training to Officers will generally be at an advanced level than that provided to
Ratings. Exercises will be conducted with an aim of testing and improving the effectiveness of the
Ship’s Emergency Organisation. Where necessary the training superintendent may be asked to
conduct courses in compliance with the STCW Convention.
Whilst a Training Superintendent is on board the Master and the chief Engineer must extend
utmost co-operation have all crew exposed to their training, and as time permits for safety
discussions.
The Training superintendent issues a Memo to the vessel on the observations and minor
deficiencies noted during the visit. This is entered in the SMMS and would be available in the
office when the vessel sends the next SMMS export file. Corrective action date is to be entered in
the SMMS by the vessel when the corrective action is completed.
Officers are to have their Shipboard Training Record Book endorsed by the Training
superintendent.
WFOM are arranged for officers at various crewing centres. It is a forum for informing officers of
current issues and future goals of the company, discussions with respect to safety, discussing
any accidents experienced within the fleet, technical upgrade and other relevant issues. Office
staff from the Managing Director and others attends, present papers and brief the officers on the
subject matters and encourage active dialogue.
Various specialist courses are available at WMTC. Tanker officers participate in Liquid cargo
handling course. Engineers and electrical officers participate in Machinery maker's courses,
including those on automation and control systems, Boilers and water treatment, and various
types of pumps.
WMTC has special courses on PLC (Programmable Logic Circuit) & SCADA (Supervisory
Control and Data Acquisition). The PLC and SCDA course helps the candidate to get knowledge
on SCADA and PLC controllers which are extensively used in cargo and main engine operations.
As more and more cargo and engine room operations are computer controlled, these computers
control the PLCs for opening of valves, starting of cargo pumps etc.. And the whole set of PLCs is
controlled by the SCADA controller. Data acquisition in the ship’s machinery begins at the PLC
level and includes meter readings and equipment statuses, which are communicated to the
SCADA. Data is then compiled and formatted in such a way, that the Duty Officer in the Control
SECTION 8
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
TRAINING Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2012
MANUAL- PART I
Page -4- Approved by : Managing Director
Office staff are regularly sent for various professional courses and their experiences are passed
to others as a debrief note or memorandum on their return.
Oil Spill Management Training is provided for the Superintendents and Managers to train them to
respond to Oil Spills.
Training seminars for office staff are held frequently at Head Office.
Our in house training centres (WMTC) in India, Manila, Qingdao and Ukraine provides modern
simulator and audio-visual training courses.
Many value courses are conducted at WMTCs’ and a full list with the schedule and frequency is
available at the Wallem website www.wallem.com. The complete list of courses with their
schedule and frequency are also available at the recruiting centres.
The list below is not exhaustive but details some of the courses :
In addition to the above, various Specialised Courses are conducted at covering varied and
related topics, designed to improve the sea going personnel’s skill and knowledge.
Officers and WALLEM employees are urged to utilise the Courses accorded at the Training
Centre for their individual professional improvement.
New courses are added based on review of training needs by the management. Officers and
Wallem employees are to check with WMTC on any new courses introduced. Details of the new
courses are forwarded to the ships as and when they are scheduled.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 9 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -1-
Oil & Petroleum products Relevant procedures in the Ship Type Specific Operation Manual
Noxious Liquid Substances Relevant procedures in the Ship Type Specific Operation Manual
Dangerous Goods Relevant procedures in the Ship Type Specific Operation Manual
Ballast water Control / Including Relevant ballast handling procedures in the Ballast Water Exchange
transfer of micro organisms Manual (Ship Specific)
Halons ,CFC’s Relevant procedures in the Ship Type Specific Operation Manual For
Reefer ships & WALLEM for sub contractor control for supply or gases
and stores.
Anti-fouling paints / TBT WALLEM for sub contractor control for supply of paints and chemicals
for compliance with IAFF convention
Noise Pollution WALLEM for sub contractor control for compliance with ILO standards.
Vibration See Sec 9.6 and 9.7 below.
WALLEM remains committed to protect the environment from pollution caused by above pollutants
and controls are implemented as indicated in the list appended.
9.2 SAFETY PROCEDURES ---------- Refer to Company Safety Manual.
9.4 SHIP SPECIFIC OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE - Refer to the Ship Type Specific Operation
Manual.
9.6 NOISE
Control Measures:
1. Placing noisier machines together away from quieter areas.
2. Minimising human intervention in noisier areas.
3. Use of personal protective devices including ear protectors.
4. Find alternate means of carrying out the task which eliminates the noisy process.
5. All personnel in the vicinity of a noisy machine or process to use adequate PPE.
6. If elimination of a noisy process or equipment as a whole is impracticable, try to
separate individual sources of sound.
7. Once the causes or sources of noise are identified, an attempt should be made to
control or reduce the nosie at sources as follows:
- Noise generated by impact – eliminate the impact by either reducing its velocity or
changing from metal to plastic or rubber, cushioning or coating the surfaces of
impact.
- Noise from moving parts can be reduced by dynamic balancing of rotating parts or
widening of gaps so that moving parts just miss obstructions.
- Reduce noise generated in fluid flow by reducing the velocity of flow and
avoidance of unnecessary air-jets.
- In case of steam pressure, ensure that lines are properly warmed up and increase
pressure gradually to avoid water hammer.
- Periodic maintenance and repair of moving parts including gear teeth, bearings,
belts.
- Minimising the time during which such equipment is run.
- Use an enclosure or block or shield to protect the worker from the source of noise.
- Use an acoustic booth or shelter to prorect the worker in a noisy environment and
minimise his exposure.
9.7 Vibration
- Whole body vibration when the body is supported on a surface which is vibrating.
- Hand-transmitted vibration, which enters the body through the hands and is caused
by various processes in which vibrating tools or workplaces are grasped or pushed by
the hands or fingers.
In order to protect workers from the adverse effects of vibration, the vessel must carry out
a risk assessment to identify the sources of vibration that present a risk to safety and
health and implement measures aimed at minimising such vibration.
Control Measures:
Hot workplaces can cause heat exhaustion, dehydration, heat cramps and heat strokes,
and may exacerbate existing health conditions such as such as heart problems, high or
low blood pressure, respiratory conditions and kidney disease.
Measures that might be taken include encouraging staff to wear appropriate clothing
which enables arms and legs to be uncovered to assist with cooling, and allowing them to
drink plenty of cool water at regular intervals and avoid standing for long periods. The
shipboard management to allow the staff to take breaks in cooler and/or less humid areas
or transfer some work to cooler and/or less humid areas, or negotiate to alter working
hours so that work can be done in the cooler parts of the day such as early morning.
The risk to the health of workers increases as conditions move further away from those
generally accepted as comfortable. Risk of heat stress arises, for example, from working
in high air temperatures, exposure to high thermal radiation or high levels of humidity,
such as those found in engine room and when vessel is in high temperature/humid
regions.
Cold stress may arise, for example, from working in cold weather conditions and in cold
stores/reefer compartments.
Risk Assessment for workers health from working in either a high or low temperature
environment needs to consider both personal and environmental factors.
- Medical pre-selection of employees to ensure that they are fit to work in these
environments.
- Use of suitable personal protective clothing (which may need to be heat resistant or
insulating, depending on whether the risk is from heat or cold).
- Acclimatization of workers to the environment in which they work, particularly for hot
environments.
- The high/low temperature parts of any operating machinery or equipment to be
adequately lagged or barriers in place to avoid hot/cold burns.
- Training in the precautions to be taken; and supervision, to ensure that the
precautions identified by the assessment are taken.
Risk Assessment:
Risk assessment to be considered include but are not limited to the following:
1. Harm to health of ship staff and others who may be affected from the effects of
Environmental Tobacco Smoke
2. Fire safety due to the failure to adequately dispose of cigarette waste or the
proximity of smoking areas to combustible materials e.g. oxygen supplies
3. Level of supervision/observation required for service users when smoking
4. Harm to property due to the effects of Environmental Tobacco Smoke
5. Increased incidence of violence and aggression
Control Measures:
- Smoking to be done only is the designated smoke rooms. No smoking while in bed
and in public areas.
- Adequate “No Smoking” notices to be posted conspicuously.
- The designated smoking rooms to have effective ventilation facilities to inhibit
tobacco smoke accumulating inside the designated smoke room and entering in
other compartments
- Suitable honey comb/metallic ashtrays to be in use for precautions against fire as per
guidelines in safety manual.
- Adequate safety matches onboard.
- Maintaining the fire alarms, fire detectors for satisfactory operation and compliance
with diligent fire rounds onboard.
- Smokers to duly regard the sensibilities of personnel who are averse to smoking due
personal, religious, cultural or health reasons.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 9 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -6-
Risk Assessment:
Risk assessment to be considered include but are not limited to the following;
Control Measures:
- Substances brought into the workplace and handled, stored and used for processing
(e.g. raw materials, solvents, cleaning agents, glues, resins, paints);
- Substances generated by a process or work activity (e.g. fumes from
welding/soldering, dust from machining of wood, solvent vapours from painting, dust
from quarrying);
- Substances or mixtures produced by the work process including by-products,
residues or waste.
- Chemical agents can be considered hazardous not only because of what they
contain, i.e. as a constituent or chemical ingredient, but because of the form or way in
which they are used at the workplace e.g. hot water used as steam can cause very
severe burns and control measures need to be specified to prevent harm.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 9 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -7-
Risk Assessment to be considered include but are not limited to the following:
- Think about raw materials, substances generated or emitted by the process and final
products
- Consider all persons who may be affected Information on health hazards can be
found on packaging labels. Information may also be obtained from Safety Data
Sheets or other information provided by the supplier, from trade magazines, from
plant/equipment suppliers or from specialists working in your industry.
- Is fire or explosion a risk?
- When is it possible for spills or splashes to occur?
- Under what circumstances might substances can be breathed in swallowed or
absorbed through the skin?
- Are exposures likely to be significant? This depends on the duration and frequency of
exposure as well as the concentration of the substance involved.
- What malfunction or accident could result in a serious exposure?
- The threat of fire or explosion needs to be guarded against.
Control Measures:
Master are to ensure that all sub contractors and other shore personnel, such as riding
gangs, whilst working onboard apply Health, Safety and Environment standards at least
equal to those of WALLEM. When such personnel are onboard for a voyage they must
sign vessel's 'Articles' and their duties during an emergency must be explained prior to
sailing from the port at which they join. They would be given the familairastion booklet and
they must sign the last page to confirm their understanding. Chief officer/designated should
brief them as mentioned in the Familarisation booklet,
Sub Contractors and shore Personnel must sign LOI as per General Letter 3 in Insurance
section of General Letter Part II. Master to keep signed original on board. Copy is to be sent
to the office only on their instructions.
While it is the responsibility of all ship's personnel to avoid accidents it is equally important
for there to be an efficient Emergency Organisation onboard all WALLEM ships.
It is the Master's responsibility to see that all ship's personnel are familiar with: -
The safety of everyone onboard depends upon the ability of ship's personnel to meet the
unexpected and it is the Master's duty to ensure that the ship's Emergency Organisation is
ready to cope with all likely contingencies. An explanation of how the Emergency
Organisation is to be structured and guidance on dealing with various contingencies (fire,
rescue from enclosed spaces etc.) is given in the Safety Manual, which is to be studied by
all Ship's Personnel.
Musters, Drills or Emergency Exercises are to be conducted weekly and their times and
types varied so that all Ship's Personnel are thoroughly familiar with their duties. Please
refer to Chapter 3 of the Safety Manual, which has a matrix “ Yearly Program for
Emergency Exercises.
The purpose of Emergency Exercises is to prepare for emergencies and this should be
borne in mind when they are organised, so that they are as realistic as possible. On no
account are they to be allowed to degenerate into a periodic chore with no substance of
reality. Attention is particularly to be paid to communication procedures during Exercises.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 10 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
DECK PROCEDURES
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -2-
The Master must ensure that each of the Officers is given the opportunity to take charge
during Exercises, bearing in mind the possibility of causalities in a real emergency.
All Emergency Exercises are to be recorded in deck and engine room logbooks.
During each fire drill, the Emergency fire pump is to be tried out to ensure that it is taking
proper suction and that the delivery pressure is sufficient.
In the event of actual emergency Officers must remember that their leadership and firm
conduct will, together with realistic training experience, be the best guard against panic,
injury or loss of life.
Officers directing an actual emergency operation in any part of the ship must keep the
bridge informed so that the Master is able to maintain an overall picture of the situation and
a co-ordinated action achieved.
The Chief Officer is responsible to the Master for the preparation of the Emergency Muster
Bill, which must be revised when any crew change takes place and before the ship puts to
sea. A suitable number of the Emergency Muster Bills must be displayed throughout the
ship so that all Ship's Personnel can become familiar with them.
The Chief Officer must ensure that all newly joining personnel are made fully acquainted
with the requirements of the Emergency Muster Bill, the meaning of the various signals
which will be used in a local emergency and general emergency and the Boat Stations to
which they are assigned.
i. THE SIGNAL FOR ANY LOCAL EMERGENCY ONBOARD (FIRE, RESCUE, MAN
OVERBOARD ETC) WILL BE THE CONTINUOUS SOUNDING OF THE
EMERGENCY ALARMS ACCOMPANIED BY 4 (FOUR) LONG BLASTS ON THE
SHIP'S WHISTLE. This will be the signal for all Ship's Personnel to proceed to
their emergency stations as detailed on the Emergency Muster Bill.
iii. The order to abandon ship will be given only by the Master or Officer deputising for
him.
The greatest care must be exercised to prevent an outbreak of fire on board. All Officers
must be thoroughly conversant with the contents of the Safety Manual, which contains
precise and detailed instructions on fire prevention and fire fighting, including Exercises and
Training.
The Master must bring the attention of Officers and Ratings to the possible origins and
dangers of fire. Constant vigilance in all aspects of fire, from prevention to cure, will
minimise this real DANGER.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 10 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
DECK PROCEDURES
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -3-
Efficient fire patrols are to be maintained on board as required by Chapter 2 of the Safety
Manual. Particular care is to be exercised at times of high risk, e.g. during repairs and lay-
up periods.
Care is to be exercised in the handling of electrical appliances and lights to ensure that they
are of the required standard and that it is safe to use them. Appliances powered by ship's
supply are not to be left switched on and unattended.
In port the Master must post notices of how to summon the Fire Brigade, together with such
other shore services, as he may consider necessary. One notice must be in a conspicuous
position in the accommodation.
In the event of fire in port the closest liaison between the ship and shore authorities is to be
maintained. Shore authorities and others may be unaware of the danger due to loss of
stability by the use of large quantities of water and are to be reminded of this where
necessary.
When welding or other "hot work" is to take place the precautions listed in the Safety
Manual are to be followed. Port regulations must also be complied with. All hot work
certificates are to be signed by the Master.
The Master must ensure that sufficient personnel remain onboard in port to form an
Emergency Squad as defined in Chapter 2.5 of the Safety Manual.
10.8 Smoking
The dangers of fire resulting from careless smoking must be appreciated fully by all ship's
personnel and the instructions on smoking followed. It is the duty of all Officers to explain
and enforce the instructions set out in the Safety Manual.
At sea smoking is permitted at the discretion of the Master and will be restricted to cabins,
mess rooms, wheelhouse and engine control room.
* For Danish flag vessels – please refer to additional restriction on smoking in Appendix 9 of
Tanker Operation Manual
In port or at cargo buoy moorings or during ship/ship, ship/barge operations, smoking will be
subject to Terminal or Harbour Regulations. In the absence of these, smoking will be
restricted to one designated room for Officers and one for Crew in the after part of the ship.
On no account will smoking or the carriage of matches be permitted anywhere on the open
decks, in pump rooms, store rooms or paint rooms. Lighters are forbidden on tankers.
Ashtrays on all vessels are to be of the approved “honeycomb” type.
In compartments such as engine rooms fitted with CO2 /Halon systems, care is to be taken
to ensure that the audible alarm is working and that sufficient time is allowed for evacuation
before CO2 or Halon flooding.
All ship's personnel are to be familiar with the tone of the CO2/ Halon alarm and to
understand that immediately it sounds they are to evacuate the space with all speed.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 10 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
DECK PROCEDURES
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2011
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -4-
Detailed procedures are in place for lowering lifeboats and are available in SMS DVD
General Letter 16 & 17 in General Letters Safety Section. These procedures have to be
strictly complied with when lowering lifeboats
All lifeboats are to be lowered and manoeuvred in the water at intervals not exceeding 3
months and the engines run at full power both Ahead and Astern. When for any reason this
routine has not been possible, the Master is to inform the Company with the very valid
reason and find the best opportunity to lower lifeboats. Every opportunity should be taken to
practice this exercise when the ship is in sheltered waters.
On vessel fitted with on-load release enclosed lifeboats, Master and all officers are to make
themselves thoroughly familiar with the release mechanism and instill confidence
among themselves and the Crew in handling such boats. There has been numerous
accidents with such boats due to crew unfamiliarity with the on-load release mechanisms.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 10 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
DECK PROCEDURES
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2012
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -5-
A lifeboat designated as an accident and emergency boat (rescue boat) must be kept ready
for immediate use. A special crew must be selected and trained for duty in the accident
boat, which must be under the charge of an experienced Deck Officer. This crew must
have regular practice musters and the boat should be launched into the water and used
whenever possible. The Master must ensure that appropriate arrangements are made for
the proper provisioning of lifeboats at all times. All lifeboat stores are to be kept fresh by
periodic replacement.
Free Fall lifeboats need additional precautions due to the nature of their launching
system. It is important that all protective covers and any obstructions in the boats way is
removed prior launch. The boats slings and rigging should be properly cleared prior
launch. All occupants should take their place and have their seat belts fastened prior
launching. Also, all doors and hatches are to be closed. The instructions given herein are
only for general guidance and vessel to follow the launching instructions given in the
lifeboat manual and in the launching instructions at the embarkation platform should be
strictly adhered to for safe and rapid launching of boat by free fall method.
Non inflatable Lifejackets are not to be worn when launching the free fall lifeboat as this
may cause injury to the person. Inflatable lifejackets can be worn during launching but
they should only be launched after the boat is waterborne.
During drills with free fall lifeboats, Simulated launching can be carried out if the boat is
not launched by free fall. Please refer to 3.21.1 in section 3 of Safety Manual for details.
Most Lifeboat accidents have occurred during training drills. Vessels are not to lower
lifeboats when making way through water. Detailed Instructions on launching lifeboats
and on Maintenance of lifeboats have been given in SMS Documentation DVD, WSM –
GENERAL LETTERS “Safety Section” also provides useful reading on Lifeboats.
The assigned operating crew need not be onboard lifeboats during launching,
unless the Master, with the authority conferred to him by paragraph 5.5 of the ISM
code, considers this necessary after considering all the safety aspects.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 10 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
DECK PROCEDURES
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : October 2008
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -6-
The political climate in many parts of the world is such that acts of violence may be
committed at any time and in any place. The victims of these acts are not necessarily
connected with the reasons for them.
When the ship is in port or at anchor a watch must be kept against intruders from the shore
or from small craft.
Unauthorised persons must not be allowed on board and the Deck OOW must ensure that
he is aware of the identity of all persons boarding the ship
Particular vigilance is required at ports where there is a risk of stowaways and at ports
where illicit traders operate.
Refer to Ship security Plan (SSP) for detailed instructions and follow the procedures
detailed in the SSP.
Persons engaged in any work, which involves risk to health, or injury should be provided
with protective clothing and equipment offering adequate protection against the hazards
involved.
10.16 Lighting
All parts of the vessel in which persons may be working or passing should be suitably and
effectively lit.
Any opening, through which a person may fall, including open hatches, should be
adequately and securely fenced or otherwise guarded so as to prevent a person falling.
Proper access will be provided to the ship whilst alongside or at anchor. Safety nets are to
be rigged below gangways, brows etc.
Prior undertaking any hot work outside the designated space in the Engine Room
Workshop on board a tanker, WALLEM is to be informed and authorisation obtained. The
procedures listed in Chapter 11 of the Safety Manual are to be complied with when hot work
is undertaken.
All Hot work permits including those for Engine Room are to be approved and signed by the
Master after the Chief Engineer (or Chief Officer in cases of work outside the Engine Room)
has completed the necessary safety checks listed on the permit.
All Hot Work Permits along with the authorisation E-mail from the office (as applicable) are
to be filed as records on board and only sent to WALLEM when requested.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 10 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
DECK PROCEDURES
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2011
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -7-
The Chief Officer in consultation with the Chief Engineer will prepare the planned system for
greasing and lubrication of all machinery and equipment.
Many personal accidents have occurred while greasing winches and windlass. Toolbox
meeting is to be carried out prior greasing of winches/windlass. Sufficient number of skilled
personnel to be designated for the job and good communication and risk assessment to be
carried out prior greasing of windlass / winches.
Master to verify these checklists are completed as give in ship type specific operation
manual “Appendices” , Safety Manual and Bridge Procedures Manual.
Master is to make sure that all ship personnel are well trained for all emergencies including
Pollution Prevention. Chief Officer is training and Safety Officer and will be guided by the
Master.
Checklists for various Emergencies are listed in the MCCM and all ship personnel are to be
well trained about their duties in these Emergencies. A blank set of these checklists are to
be maintained on the Bridge.
SECTION 11
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
ENGINE ROOM PROCEDURES Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Page - 1 - Rev.No. / Date : Nov 2013
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
A high standard of cleanliness is to be maintained in the engine room and other machinery
spaces in order to reduce the risk of fire. Combustible materials such as oily rags and
waste must not be allowed to accumulate. It is particularly important to prevent any
accumulation of oil, which might constitute a fire hazard. The Engineer OOW must at
regular intervals inspect all accessible places in the engine room and report to the Chief
Engineer immediately any leakage of oil is discovered. Flammable stores, such as small
drums of oil and paint, must be stowed together in a safe, secure space.
Chemicals must be stored away from paints and lub oils and preferably kept in a well-
ventilated and secure locker. Proper handling instructions and Hazard notice to be
displayed prominently and appropriate personal protection be readily available.
Paints must be stored in the dedicated paint locker & away from chemicals & lubes and
never in the steering gear compartment. Working drums or pots must be, if necessary,
kept to a minimum for daily work & should be kept in a fire safe area of the E/R, preferably
in a compartment with a sprinkler system.
Engineers on joining the ship must take themselves familiar with all emergency procedures,
the layout of the machinery spaces, pipe lines, connections, escape hatches, watertight
doors, the location and operation of emergency engine and oil fuel cut-out switches etc and
with the positions and use of all extinguishing appliances and their controls.
Information for the Engineer OOW regarding the correct running conditions for machinery
would be in manufacturer’s manuals. These should show the normal operating
temperatures, pressures and other conditions for the various items of machinery in the ship,
as laid down by the maker, together with permissible variances. Chief Engineer’s standing
order should include the importance of taking action based on the latest Oil analysis
report, such as draining of F.O. tanks based on the analysis report. The Chief Engineer's
Standing Orders are to be displayed in the engine control room and must contain clear
instructions as to the circumstances in which he is to be called by the Engineer OOW.
The Engineer OOW should not hand over the watch to the relieving Engineer Officer if he
has any reason to believe that the latter is apparently under any disability which would
prevent him from carrying out his duties properly. The Engineer Officer relieved must not
leave the engine room until he is satisfied that his relief is fully acquainted with all
temperatures, pressures and other running conditions. The relieving Engineer Officer must
not take over the watch until he has read and signed any orders or instructions left by the
Chief Engineer.
SECTION 11
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
ENGINE ROOM PROCEDURES Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Page - 2 - Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2012
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
All Engineers are reminded that the engine room logbook is an important legal document,
which may be called for as evidence at Official Enquiries and other legal proceedings. It is
essential therefore that this is kept in a neat and orderly manner and that all entries be
strictly accurate; in the event of a wrong entry being made a thin line should be drawn
through it and the correction entered above or alongside. The Officer making it must initial
the correction.
The time of completing relevant CHECKLIST (see ship type specific operation manual
“Appendices”) is to be logged.
All relevant sections of logbooks must be completed. Engine room logbooks will be
periodically inspected by Company representatives.
Engine Room bilges should be attended to regularly to prevent any risk of fire. Correct
interpretation of Marpol 73/78 is imperative before any bilges are transferred or pumped out.
Engine room bilges must be pumped into a IOPP Supplement A/B designated holding tank
and then pumped ashore or out to sea only after passing through an approved separator.
E.g. Bilges pumped overside through the separator, in a special area, can only be done if
there is an automatic stopping device fitted. Ref. Marpol / Annex.1 Reg. 10 (3)(b)(vi).
The 3 way valve must be periodically checked for correct operation.
Correct entries are to be made in the Oil record book. Ref. Marpol 73/78 Annex.1 Reg. 20
and Appendix III Part I.
General Service / Ballast pumps in the engine room must NOT be used for
pumping bilges.
IN ALL CASES PRIOR PUMPING OVERBOARD, CHECK WITH THE BRIDGE
WALLEM places the utmost importance on the proper operation of the OWS. OWS is
only to be operated under C/E’s direct supervision, only in daytime, after confirming from
the bridge that vessel is 50 miles away from the nearest coastline.
The OWS and Pipelines to be painted and maintained in a different colour to the rest of
the engine room equipment for easy recognition.
C/Eng taking over, must within one week of his joining, is to check that bilge pumping
arrangement is as per original line drawing.
OWS spares are to be maintained as critical spares in the PMS System and vessel
should have sufficient OWS spares at all times.
Please refer to section 11.15 for details on the sealing of the discharge section of the
OWS piping and the procedure to break the seals for maintenance or PSC inspection.
Engineer training should include familiarization in the operation and maintenance of the
OWS including the data logger of the equipment.
SECTION 11
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
ENGINE ROOM PROCEDURES Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL- PART I
Page -3- Approved by : Directors
11.8 Boilers
Boilers are to receive the close attention of the engine room staff and boiler treatment
procedures are to be carried out according to instructions issued by the Chief Engineer.
Where boiler level sight glasses are fitted they should always be maintained in a fully
operable condition and tested daily.
If no Dead Man alarm is ftted, a system must be established to ensure that the OOW on the
bridge is made aware that a single person entry is made into the engine room during UMS
period, prior entering engine room. Contact with the bridge to be maintained at predermined
interval not exceeding 20 Mins. If such reporting telephone call is overdue, the officer on the
bridge should inform the Chief or Second Engineer who will investigate the reason. Ships with
Dead man alarm should set the alarm for 20 minutes.
If the Engineer OOW considers it necessary to stop or to slow the main engine when
underway he must advise the Deck OOW and the Chief Engineer immediately. The latter
must advise the Master of the cause and probable duration of the stoppage. Whenever
possible the bridge and the Chief Engineer should be consulted before stopping or slowing
the main engine, to enable the Deck OOW to take the necessary precautions for the
SECTION 11
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
ENGINE ROOM PROCEDURES Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I
Page -4- Approved by : Managing Director
Repairs aboard requiring shore workshop assistance may be carried out only if they are
absolutely essential. When such repairs are necessary the Master may make
arrangements only after first obtaining Company permission, except in an emergency.
The routine cleaning and survey of boilers, engines and auxiliary machinery is to be carried
out by the ship's engine room staff. The Chief Engineer is to consult the Master before any
major work of this nature is undertaken. Advantage is to be taken of every opportunity in
port, subject to port regulations, to open up, overhaul and survey machinery and boilers. A
good risk assessment needs to be carried out prior to overhauling in Port.
Engineer Officers are to understand that early attention to faults in boilers and machinery
may prevent damage and consequential expensive repairs, disruption of the ship's
programme and claims against the ship.
Attention is drawn to section I in the Bridge Procedures Manual on standby procedures for
engine manoeuvres and these must be observed.
When the order to "Standby Engines" is received from the bridge, members of the engine
department must attend at their stations immediately.
The engine room clock is to be synchronised with the bridge clock at noon each day and
also before manoeuvring the main engine.
.
11.13 Air Pollution
11.14 Sewage
Please refer to Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Sewage from Ships, Annex IV
of MARPOL 73/78 and comply.
The Bolts on the flanges of the discharge pipe of the OWS have been sealed with
numbered seals on all ships. A hole of 6 mm diameter has been drilled in the
protruding part of the bolt for each of the diametrically opposite bolt on the relevant
flanges and seal inserted in the hole. The seal numbers are entered in the “OWS seal
certificate” in the certificate section of the SMMS. Similarly, the bilge valves to the Fire
and G.S. Pumps are to be sealed.
The opening of any flange would require the seals to be broken. When any of the seals
are required to be broken for maintenance purposes, prior approval from the office is to
be obtained. If the Seals require to be broken for inspection of discharge section of OWS
by PSC inspectors, the Chief engineer is to call office on phone to obtain approval and
follow this up in due time by E-mail. The seals are not to be removed unless
authorised by the office.
Once the pipes has been fitted back after maintenance or PSC inspection, new seals are
to be fitted in place, office to be informed by email giving the new seal numbers and the
OWS certificate details in the SMMS to be amended to reflect the new seal numbers in
use along with the date.
SECTION 11
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
ENGINE ROOM PROCEDURES Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I
Page -5- Approved by : Directors
C/Eng on joining would check the seal number on the flange bolt with the numbers in the
SMMS. Any discrepancy is to be immediately reported to the office.
Even in a UMS ship, there are various circumstances when it will be necessary to man
the engine room.
The Engine room should always be manned once Engines are on Standby and ready for
Manoeuvring when approaching Port or departing ports at any other time when Standby
engines are given.
The Engine room should always be manned in pilotage water, so that there is always
an engineer available in the event of an emergency.
Flexible portable pipes are required on board for the portable pump (Wilden) or for
transferring lube oil from drums and fresh water transfer pipes, etc.
1. All portable pipes are to have their use/function purpose painted on them.
2. All portable pipes are to be kept in a locker which is locked and key kept with
C/O and Master.
3. A note book to be available in the locker in which is recorded who has taken out
a pipe(s) on what date and time and for what purpose, and the date and time
when it is returned.
4. Inventory of portable pipes to be on the door.
5. To have this working smoothly and ensuring no one is unnecessarily implicated
in any wrong doing, the process must be carefully controlled by C/O and 2/E.
6. Superintendents and Auditors will check this locker and compliance of
procedures.
7. The reason for any use of portable pipe should be explained to all crew members
involved with the operation.
Vessels fitted with Common cooling systems for Main and auxiliary engines are exposed
to the following hazards:
1. If any leaks in the cooling water system cannot be controlled, it may result in
loosing the entire cooling water.
2. This will result in rapid rise of Main Engine and Auxiliary engine temperatures and
hence loss of propulsuion and black out.
3. Loss of chemicals used for treating the cooling water.
4. Result in filling up of engine room bilges.
The Engineer officer is to be well versed with the cooling system arrangements and the
measures to take in an event of any leaks developing in the system. Isolation valves to
be well maintained to ensure integrity and operational funcationality at all times.
Extra precautions to be in place and due regard to be given for cases where as per the
original ship design the isolation valves are not provided to isolate individual units or Main
Engine from Auxiliary engines.
SECTION 12
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
CARGO OPERATION Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
PROCEDURES Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2012
MANUAL- PART I
Page - 1 - Approved by : Managing Director
12.1 General
In the event of any conflict of interests between the Charterers and the Owners, WALLEM
must be consulted.
Always refer to WSM’s SMS DVD for general guidance on cargo matters.
Bulk carriers and Tankers are to check the appendix of their ship specific manual where
“Guidance on performance of voyage with utmost dipatch’ provides detailed notes
The Master and Deck Officers are responsible for all cargoes carried in the ship. This
entails their correct receipt, stowage, and care in carriage and discharge. In this respect all
available cargo information obtained from Charterers and/or shippers and used. Should
information be scanty WALLEM must be consulted.
Master or Chief officer should not hesitate in seeking advise from charterers or Wallem
Office if they do not have experience in handling or Loading/Discharging of nominated
cargo.
When the ship is on charter, the Master is to be conversant with the terms and conditions of
the charter party and must ensure that such conditions are met. He is to ensure that Notice
of Readiness (NOR) is tendered to charters or their representative as soon as possible after
the vessel has arrived and he is satisfied that his ship is ready to receive or discharge cargo.
This may often require that the NOR is passed by telex to the charterer's agents on arrival.
All cargo documents applicable to a voyage or time charter are to be filed onboard and be
readily available.
Whenever a survey of the ship's conditions undertaken for the purpose of time charter
delivery or redelivery the Master is actively to participate to ensure that the surveyor
accurately record the vessel's condition as well as the bunker quantities.
SECTION 12
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
CARGO OPERATION Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
PROCEDURES Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2012
MANUAL- PART I
Page - 2 - Approved by : Managing Director
The Master is to be conversant with all bills of lading and the terms and conditions thereof.
He is to ensure that he is in possession of copies of bills of lading covering the current
voyage. He is not to sign bills of lading endorsed "Freight Prepaid" without confirmation
from the shipowners that it is in order to do so. In no circumstances should the Master sign
pre-dated bills of lading.
When loading bulk cargoes it is essential that the ship's figure is carefully calculated, taking
into account ullage and temperatures for liquids, or by draft survey for bulk solids.
If the difference between ship and shore figures differs by any amount a formal Protest
should be noted and full details advised to shipowners and WALLEM.
For various reasons original bills of lading may not be available for presentation to the ship
when the ship arrives at the discharge port. No cargo is to be discharged unless either the
cargo receivers present the original bills of lading to the Master, or advice has been
received from shipowners that a suitable indemnity has been obtained. Due to the increase
in frauds associated with the transfer of ownership of bulk cargoes, especially oil cargoes,
this rule is to be strictly enforced, even though delays may be incurred. In order to minimise
these delays the Master should contact cargo receivers before arrival and advise them that
original bills of lading are essential before discharge commences. These must be
personally received by the Master before discharge commences, unless, as above, he has
been advised by shipowners that a suitable indemnity have been obtained.
Guidance on Bill of lading is available in GARD booklet on Bill of lading, which is available
on board in soft copy.
Master’s are to ensure that the correct date is claused on the Bill of Lading prior to signing
the bill of lading. Master’s to also ensure that all instructions in the voyage orders with
respect to the bill of lading are complied with. If voyage order mentions that charterers
approval is required prior signing the bill of lading, this must be obtained in writing prior to
signing the bill of lading.
Except where the practice of the trade requires otherwise, Mate's Receipts are to be
granted for all cargo shipped and care is to be taken to ensure that they accurately record
the quantity and apparent condition of the cargo on shipment. They are to be checked, as
far as practicable, and signed by the Chief Officer for receipt of cargo onboard.
Clean bills of lading are only to be signed for cargo shipped aboard in "Apparent Good
Order and Condition" if this is in fact the case.
If the cargo is not in such a condition the Bill of Lading must be claused to reflect the true
condition of the cargo.
Cargo holds used for heavy weather ballast must be filled to 98% volume with ballast water
to avoid "sloshing" when sailing form a port and during the voyage any decrease in
“Percentage Fill” to be made up. If it is necessary to pump hold ballast, either out or in,
when at sea this will only be done in smooth sea conditions and in the shortest possible
time.
Procedures for Mid-Ocean ballast change when required to comply with particular trading
areas’ environmental/ecological regulations are detailed in Ballast water exchange manual.
12.15 Ventilation
Particular attention is to be given to the correct ventilation of different types of cargo in the
context of atmospheric conditions and the type of cargo carried. ( Request
Charterers/WALLEM if information is required).Ventilators to cargo spaces are to be
attended to, for rain, for water on deck and/or shift of wind. When any exposed deck
ventilator is liable to damage in heavy weather it is to be closed and properly secured.
Appropriate entries are to be made in the deck logbook covering the foregoing events and
on each occasion when hatches are opened for ventilation and when they are again closed.
SECTION 12
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
CARGO OPERATION Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
PROCEDURES Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2012
MANUAL- PART I
Page - 4 - Approved by : Managing Director
The use of naked lights or smoking is strictly forbidden in holds or in the vicinity of the
hatches.
Every endeavour is to be made to avoid accidents, and persons must be prevented from
entering or leaving the holds whilst cargo is being worked.
Ladders are to be examined frequently for any damage which may have occurred during
the course of cargo working and any damage found is to be repaired as soon as possible.
During the interim period between discovery and repair a notice is to be displayed warning
personnel that the ladder is damaged.
(i) All cargo gear is to be maintained in good working order and examined as required
by Class and by Government Regulations. Special attention is to be paid to masts,
derrick posts, derricks and standing rigging in respect of defects and corrosion and
the appropriate steps are to be taken to correct of repair such faults. During cargo
operations a strict watch is to be maintained on the cargo gear by the Deck OOW.
(ii) Statutory examinations of all cargo gear and associated equipment are to be
carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Flag State.
If damage or loss is sustained to the ship or its structure the Master is to ensure, as far,
as is practicable, that written acknowledgement is obtained from the responsible party.
At the time of the occurrence a Damage Report is to be made by the Master and
countersigned by those responsible for the damage, a copy of which is to be sent to
WALLEM. In all circumstances of damage, a copy of which is to be sent to WALLEM. In
all circumstances of damage the Master is to refer to the "Stevedore Damage Clause"
contained in the Charter Party and act strictly in accordance with its terms. All damage is
to be reported to WALLEM immediately and steps taken to arrange survey and repair,
with notification to the local P&I representative if deemed necessary and after
consultation with WALLEM.
SECTION 12
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
CARGO OPERATION Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
PROCEDURES Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2012
MANUAL- PART I
Page - 5 - Approved by : Managing Director
Sea Protest
Deck Log Abstract
Damage Report (supported by diagrams)
Copy Bills of Lading
Copy Manifest
Stowage Plan
Polaroid or other photographs of the damage
When operating under time or voyage charter the Master is to furnish WALLEM with all
necessary information to deal with any claim for loss or damage for which the ship may
be held responsible under the terms of the charter. Accurate and complete
documentation and ship's figures are essential to counter such claims.
When loading bulk liquids the out-turn quantity is to be checked against the bill of lading
figure and any difference notified to Charterers/WALLEM immediately.
WALLEM places the highest degree of importance on the continuous availability of inert
gas in tankers and on its correct use. Cargo tanks and slop tanks are to be kept properly
inert at all times except when required to be gas free for entry or for dry-dock. Inert Gas
Safety Procedures as detailed in the Safety Manual and ISGOTT must be complied with.
The maintenance of the Inert gas system is to be carried out as per the schedule in the
SMMS.
Inert Gas must be used for all crude and black cargoes including fuel oils.
When carrying white oil cargoes please be guided by Charterers and Owners'
requirements, however if in doubt contact WALLEM.
On tankers when the situation demands internal transfer of cargo, the complete plan for
this operation is to be informed to WALLEM who in turn will ask the Master to inform the
Charterers directly or do so themselves. The procedures for internal transfer of cargo for
mitigating oil spills should be contained in the Ship Type Specific Operation Manual.
SECTION 12
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
CARGO OPERATION Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
PROCEDURES Rev. Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL- PART I
Page - 6 - Approved by : Directors
For Tanker Operations, please refer to WALLEM Tanker Operations Manual and ISGOTT
(International Safety Guide for Tankers & Terminals) for guidelines on safe operations.
Also WALLEM Pumping Manual is provided to each vessel. For Cargo
Loading/Discharging and COW Planning use Form D25.
Bulk Carrier operations, please refer to WALLEM Bulk Carrier Manual, Bulk Carrier
Guidance Notes, and Nautical Institute book “Bulk Carrier Practice”
When loading of steel cargo is anticipated, Fleet Cell must be informed, along with loading
port, date, agent's details etc. Pre-loading survey for steel cargoes will then be arranged.
Please refer to carriage of Steel Cargoes, (loss prevention guide)
The Cargo Securing Manual (CSM), which is a class approved manual, stipulates minimum
criteria for securing and lashing of cargo and maintenance of securing material. This CSM
should be always referred to for guidance and used as a tool with stevedores / Charterers to
ensure that the proper securing of cargo is accomplished.
Weather including tide (it’s strength and /or change of direction) must be diligently
monitored in port, when at anchor or at berth and regularly logged. Depending on the
watch system on board the weather must be recorded at the change of watch and more
frequently if weather is a cause for concern.
Cargo operations should be stopped in time and hatches closed. On tankers the weather
parameters for stoppage of cargo operations and disconnecting hoses must be
established, with the terminal, prior commencement of cargo operations and complied
with accordingly when needed.
In case where the tide/current is making it impossible to keep the vessel alongside safely,
the cargo operation must be stopped in good time to prevent any damage to the ship, or
shore installation. A decision has to be taken, whether tugs are to be employed to keep
the vessel alongside; if this is the case then the berth could be termed “ unsafe” and all
extra cost to be noted for Charterers account and protest lodged immediately.
When at anchor or berth a storm (cyclone, typhoon etc.) warning is received, steps are to
be taken to proceed to sea immediately to ride out the storm. Charterers/WALLEM are to
be consulted if time is available. Should time or pilotage constraints prevail; all possible
additional mooring lines are to be put out, vessel battened down & secured for heavy
weather, main engines on stand by, and crew at stations and Charterers /WALLEM
informed.
SECTION 13
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
DRUGS & ALCOHOL Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I
Page -1- Approved by : Directors
13.1.1 It is company policy that, with some exceptions, only beer is to be carried onboard in the ship’s
Bonded store. “Hard” liquor, for any reason whatsoever, is NOT allowed onboard on any of the
company’s vessels.
• The exceptions referred to in paragraph 1.1 are those ships which fly the flag of a country
whose laws prohibit the consumption of alcohol; Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Libya, for example,
although there are several others.
• Exceptions are also where vessel’s Owners or trading area do not permit any alcohol on
board vessel.
13.1.2 Carriage or consumption of drugs not obtained by prescription from a doctor or from the ship’s
medical chest through the Master is an offence. Wallem shall actively co-operate with any
Government or Government Agency investigation for drug abuse on managed vessel.
13.1.3 Misuse of legitimate drugs, or the use, possession, distribution or sale of illicit or unprescribed
drugs onboard ships is prohibited and any seafarer found in breach of this will be subject to
immediate dismissal.
13.1.4 All seagoing staff are required to undertake appropriate blood or urine tests to test for usage of
drugs and alcohol abuse as part of pre-employment medical.
13.1.5 All seagoing staff may be asked to submit to undergo unannounced, random testing and
screening for usage of banned substances in clause 1.6 and for alcohol. The personnel will be
tested for alcohol and drug usage at least once a year. Over and above, any seafarer shall be
required to undergo further tests if requested by Charterers, Owners or Port Authorities.
Unannounced alcohol test is carried out every month by the Master and alteast once a year from
the office,
• If the vessel is involved in an accident which is likely to become a Cat I accident or a ,serious
marine incident (SMI) in the United states, post incident testing will be carried out:
o All mariners and marine employees involved in the casualty or incident are to be tested
for Alcohol use within two (2) hours of the incident/occurrence.
o All mariners and marine employees involved in the casualty or incident are to be tested
for Drugs within 32 hours of the incident/occurrence.
• To comply with post incident testing, all vessels are supplied with test kits for collecting urine
sample. The urine samples can then be sent to the testing service provider by courier. Where
possible, Wallem shall arrange a D & A testing provider to attend on board for post incident
testing.
13.1.6 The list of banned substances will include, but not be limited to, marijuana, cocaine, opiates,
phencyclidine (PCP) and amphetamines.
13.2.1 Officers and watch keeping ratings will not consume any alcoholic beverages 4 hours
immediately preceding their watch standing-duty.
13.2.2 No alcoholic beverages are to be served on the dining table during meal hours.
SECTION 13
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
DRUGS & ALCOHOL Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I
Page -2- Approved by : Directors
13.2.3 Any consumption of Alcohol by the persons on board shall not result in blood alcohol concentration
(BAC) of more than 0.04% by weight at any time, by an individual. It is reiterated that alcoholic
beverages available to onboard personnel will be limited to beer only.
13.2.4 BAC of 0.04% means 40 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood
Type of Beer Volume Alcohol content units Issue of case Consumption limitation Consumption
(24 can) (Any 24 hours)* limitation
(1 hour)
Extra 12 Oz / 330 ml >4.0% <6.0% 2.5 Every 3 weeks 1 standard can 1 standard can
Strength
Ordinary 12 Oz / 330 ml >1.0% <4.0% 1.0 Every 2 weeks 3 standard cans 2 standard
Strength cans
Low 12 Oz / 330 ml >0.05% <1.0% 0.5 Every week 6 standard cans 3 standard
Strength cans
• Any 24 Hour means 24 hours period but seafarer must allow for 12 hours before the consumption on next day
• Consumption of beer can shall be over a minimum period of 20 minutes each
13.3 GUIDELINES GOVERNING THE SALE & CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL ONBOARD WSM
MANAGED VESSELS
13.3.1 Each Seafarer is individually responsible to ensure that he complies with the established alcohol
consumption levels.
13.3.2 Master and departmental heads shall ensure that all seafarers are fully conversant with the
requirements of the procedure, implement the control procedure and report any non-compliance.
13.4.1 No alcoholic beverages shall be purchased ashore and brought onboard by individuals.
13.4.2 All beer shall only be purchased through the ship’s slop chest.
13.4.3 Sale of beer will be as per Table 1 : Table of Alcohol content. Chief Cook/PCO or seafarer
nominated by Master will maintain an issue log for all the staff.
13.4.4 Seafarer shall NOT purchase the second case without having consumed the previous case.
13.4.5 The Company prohibits the consumption of hard spirits; staff are not to be in possession of wine,
whisky, brandy, gin, vodka, rum or other hard spirits at any time. Crewmember found to be in
possession of hard spirits/liquor could be dismissed with all associated expenses for his repatriation
to his personal wage.
13.4.6 Seafarers are required to exercise restraint during consumption of alcoholic beverages ashore.
Seafarers to comply with BAC levels stated in the policy, whether on board or ashore.
13.4.7 Any crewmember who exhibits signs of impairment shall not be allowed to stand duty. A test shall be
carried out (using the test equipment/kit supplied) to measure the content of alcohol in the
crewmember’s blood. An official log entry is to be made of each such incidence and reported to the
Company.
13.4.8 If the officer or rating being relieved has reason to believe that his reliever has alcohol impairment
then he will report such cases to Master who will subject the officer/rating to alcohol test. If found
impaired a substitute watchkeeper will be arranged. The matter is to be recorded in the official
logbook and incident reported to Company.
SECTION 13
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
DRUGS & ALCOHOL Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I
Page -3- Approved by : Directors
13.4.9 No alcoholic beverages for onboard consumption are to be offered to personnel visiting the vessel,
for business or otherwise. Only beer may be kept in the vessel’s bonded store, for use by the Master
as gratuities for shore personnel. It is reiterated that consumption/carriage of hard liquor/spirits is
forbidden on board the company’s vessel.
13.4.10 No issue of alcoholic beverages is to be made from 24 hours prior arrival load/discharge port until
vessel departs from coastal waters or territorial limits of the country.
13.5.1 Seafarers will self certify their consumption as per the standard form where details of consumption
and issue for individual seafarer is maintained. The safety officer will review the consumption at the
end of each month against the issue of beer
• This record is to be made available to Superintendents or other office staff during visits. The
issue & consumption log shall be discussed in the monthly safety meeting and mentioned in
the Safety meeting which is sent to the office for review.
13.5.2 Seafarer shall NOT purchase and resell or gift the alcoholic beverages to other seafarers.
13.5.3 During the weekly Master’s inspection, the senior officers would ensure that seafarers are not
storing up beer cans. If any person is found infringing the guidelines, then explanation is to be
sought and disciplinary warning to be issued. Additionally, if the Master finds hard liquor in the
possession of the crewmember, the same is to be reported to the Fleet Cell. Fleet Cell will inform
the Management team for further action.
13.5.4 Entries in the official logbook are to be made recording any infringement of these guidelines on
either alcohol impairment. Copies of these logbook entries are to be sent to the office for records
and advice on further action to be taken.
13.5.5 All seafarers on board shall be randomly tested for alcohol abuse each calendar month. Appropriate
entry being made in the “Drug and Alcohol Testing Record (DE32)”. Staffs are also to comply with
“Reasonable Cause Testing” requirements, where any seagoing staff on board may be asked to
submit to a test for Drugs and / or Alcohol in the event the Master or another individual feels that the
crew member is exhibiting signs of Drug or Alcohol abuse.
• Company may message the Master to test specific persons on board for alcohol abuse and
require results back within 2 hours. Test conducted under such condition to be witnessed by
2 Officers.
• Should a crewmember be asked by the Master or Company official or an authorized sample
collector, to be tested for drug or alcohol abuse, or to provide a sample and refuses to do so;
then such act will automatically be taken as a positive result and the crewmember will face
disciplinary action.
• Should a crewmember be on medication at time of an unannounced random test or sample
procedure, he must provide the sample collector with details of such medication to prevent
false positive results.
13.6 EQUIPMENT
13.6.3 If any of the above two items are not onboard the company should be advised immediately so that
the same may be supplied to the vessel
SECTION 13
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
DRUGS & ALCOHOL Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I
Page -4- Approved by : Directors
13.7.1 The approved drug testing collection kit is onboard and it should be able to collect 10 urine samples.
13.7.2 If any of the above two items are not onboard the company should be advised immediately so that
the same may be supplied to the vessel
13.7.3 Category I Accidents are fatality or damages with implication greater than 150,000 USD or Major Oil
spill or Gas Release (Major spill is a spill above 1 barrel, 42 US gallons or 159 litres)
Serious Marine Incident : A reportable marine casualty that results in the death of a crewmember,
passenger or other person, or an injury that requires professional medical treatment beyond first aid,
and renders the individual unfit to perform routine vessel duties, damage to property in excess of
$100,000, or a discharge of 10,000 gallons or more of oil (or a reportable quantify of a hazardous
substance), into the navigable waters of the U.S. . Casualty reports of crewmember or passenger
injuries that are not in conjunction with any other criteria of a serious marine incident or major
marine casualty will not be considered;
Major Marine Casualty : A reportable marine casualty that results in the death of at least 6
crewmembers, or damage to property in excess of $500,000;
13.8.1 During inspections of the vessel, the Master and other Senior Officers are to be aware of the
possibility of the ship being used for the smuggling of drugs, particularly when trading in known high
risk regions. He is to ensure that Customs Officers are accompanied on any inspection of the ship. It
is the Master's responsibility to see that stringent security measures are taken in port, particularly at
the ship's gangway, to prevent drugs being brought onboard. Please refer to SMS
13.8.2 Documentation DVD, WSM – GENERAL LETTERS “Safety Section” for detailed information on
measures to prevent crew involvement in drug smuggling. Should illegal drugs or substances be
discovered onboard, the Master should: -
• Guard the location b) Avoid handling the substance c) Have photographs taken d) Record
details of the discovery in the deck logbook e) Search similar locations f) Write a detailed
report g) Inform WSM in HONG KONG h) Cancel shore leave until interviews are completed
with the appropriate authority in the port of arrival. i) Drugs found whilst the vessel is in port
should be made secure by the Master and reported to the Customs Authority.
• WALLEM is signatory to the “Sea Carrier Initiative Agreement” detailed in SBM Part 2
Vessels are to weld a iron rod grid (standard grating would suffix) at rudder stock opening
with sufficient clearance around rudder stock to prevent transom space being used for
concealing drugs or by stowaway. Please refer to SMS Documentation DVD, WSM –
GENERAL LETTERS “Safety Section” for details on preventive measures against drug
trafficking.
13.9.1 Seek directions from WALLEM whenever drugs or suspected drugs are found onboard.
13.10 REFERENCE OCIMF – GUIDELINES FOR THE CONTROL OF DRUGS AND ALCOHOL
ONBOARD SHIP
Recognising the potentially serious impact of marine incidents, the Oil Companies International
Marine Forum (OCIMF), and the marine industry in general, have over the years developed
guidance aimed at encouraging safe ship operation and protection of the environment. Whilst
tanker companies have generally operated with strict policies related to drug and alcohol use
SECTION 13
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
DRUGS & ALCOHOL Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I
Page -5- Approved by : Directors
onboard their ships, OCIMF considers it timely that the industry as a whole reassesses the
control of drugs and alcohol on board ships.
OCIMF recommends that shipping companies should have a clearly written policy on drug and
alcohol abuse that is easily understood by seafarers as well as shore-based staff. In order to
enforce their policy, companies should have rules of conduct and controls in place, with the
objective that no seafarer will navigate a ship or operate its onboard equipment whilst impaired by
drugs or alcohol. It is recommended that seafarers be subject to testing and screening for drugs
and alcohol abuse by means of a combined programme of un-announced testing and routine
medical examination. The frequency of this un-announced testing should be sufficient so as to
serve as an effective deterrent to such abuse.
The misuse of legitimate drugs, or the use, possession, distribution or sale of illicit or
unprescribed controlled drugs on board ship cannot be condoned and should be prohibited. In
addition, any use of a prescribed controlled drug which causes, or contributes to unacceptable job
performance or unusual job behaviour should require the seafarer to be excused from duty until
such times as he is repatriated, or treatment and its after effects cease.
The suggested list of substances to be prohibited should include, but not be limited to marijuana,
cocaine, opiates, phencyclidine (PCP) and amphetamines and their derivatives. In this regard, the
International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) has published guidelines on recognition and detection of
drug trafficking and abuse entitled “Drug Trafficking and Drug Abuse: Guidelines for Owners and
Masters on Recognition and Detection”.
Company policy should provide for control of onboard alcohol distribution and monitoring of
consumption. This policy should support the principle that officers and ratings should not be
impaired by alcohol when performing scheduled duties.
OCIMF recommends that officers and ratings observe a period of abstinence from alcohol prior to
scheduled watchkeeping duty or work periods. This may be either a fixed period, such as the 4
hours required by the USCG, or a minimum period of 1 hour of abstinence for each unit of alcohol
consumed (refer to section 2.4 for examples of approximate alcohol unit conversions). Whichever
method is used to determine the abstinence period, the objective should always be to ensure that,
prior to going on scheduled duty, the blood alcohol content of the seafarer is theoretically zero.
Officers and ratings should be aware that local regulations may be in place and where this is the
case, it is recommended that these be strictly adhered to where they exceed these guidelines.
Recognising that all seafarers must be able to respond at any time to an emergency situation, the
International Maritime Organization (IMO) is considering including guidance to administrations on
maximum permissible blood alcohol content (BAC) and abstinence periods in Part ‘B’ of the Code
which is to be annexed to the revised STCW Convention.
However, whilst some administrations have already established national legislation in this regard,
in the absence of national or international requirements, companies should advise seafarers in
their employment of the maximum permissible blood alcohol content (BAC) permitted whilst on
board their ships. (0.04%)
In the interest of health and safety, seafarers should be actively encouraged not to exceed
consumption levels which could affect long term health. Information should be provided to
seafarers on alcohol consumption in relation to impairment, its impact on behaviour and health,
and the availability of rehabilitation programmes.
OCIMF is firmly of the opinion that it is in the best interest of all sectors of the maritime industry to
positively respond to these guidelines and thus work to ensure a safe workplace for seafarers
and to protect the safety and well being of the public and the environment.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 14 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
MAINTENANCE SYSTEM Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I
Page -1- Approved by : Managing Director
14.3 Planned Maintenance of Safety, Life Saving & Fire Fighting Equipment
This aspect is contained in the Safety section of the SMMS.
Contents of DE-28 is in SMMS, therefore there is no need to maintain PMS cards on this
system on vessels installed with SMMS. The Wall Chart DE-28A, is to be kept updated on all
ships in the Deck Office. Items ( W9, M11, M12, & M13 ) which are not included in DE-28 are to
be included in the SMMS.
LSA & FFA Maintenance and upkeep must be given HIGHEST PRIORITY and IMPORTANCE
It Concerns Crew and Ship safety.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 14 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
MAINTENANCE SYSTEM Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I
Page -2- Approved by : Managing Director
14.3.1 Planned maintenance of Safety, Firefighting, & Lifesaving Equipment Delegation of Duties.
The above is for guidance. The details will be inserted in the Safety section of SMMS.
Note :
1. Items marked ** are to be completed by Trained personnel only (refer MSC.1/Circ
1432).
2. All fire protection systems & appliances should at all times be in good order and
readily available for immediate use while the ship is in service.
3. Master shall ensure that, If a fire protection system is undergoing maintenance,
testing or repair, then suitable arrangements should be made to ensure safety is
not diminished through the provision of alternate fixed or portable fire protection
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 14 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
MAINTENANCE SYSTEM Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I
Page -5- Approved by : Managing Director
All Superintendents have access to the SMMS system on the network, which allows them to
check the status of outstanding work but does not allow any alteration of data.
Similarly, Superintendents at Wallem Norway have access the AMOSWIN system, which allows
them to check the status of outstanding work and the Planned maintenance work carried out.
Any Owner supplied PMS(if applicable) would have the same capabilities as the SMMS. Otherwise,
a system of monitoring from the office would be set up as decided on a case by case basis.
(A) Master will co-ordinate with Technical department to plan surveys. The ICS publication,
Guidance Manual for The Inspection and Condition Assessment of Tanker Structure is
placed onboard all Tankers for the guidance of the Master for planning special Survey Hull.
(B) Master will plan in consultation with Technical department inspection of Ballast tanks once a
year and all cargo tanks prior to each dry-docking. Form DT16 is to be completed for each
of these inspections. The vessel with coated ballast tanks should keep stock of suitable
paints to touch up rusty areas found during this inspection.
(C) All vessels in consultation with Technical department will plan and harmonise the hull
surveys in accordance with Classification Society requirements including enhanced hull
surveys to maintain the vessel in Class always.
The term "enhanced survey" refers to the expanded and more detailed hull survey requirements
applicable to oil tankers and bulk cargo ships that will be necessary for compliance with the IACS
Requirements. These arose in response to the universally accepted need to establish more effective
hull classification surveys of these ship types.
14.7.1 Application
Enhanced survey requirements are applicable to oil tankers, ore/oil ships, ore/bulk/oil ships
and bulk cargo ships and affect the survey of hull structure within the length of the cargo oil
tanks or the cargo holds (including double bottom, topside and side tanks) of these groups
of ships. These requirements will significantly influence survey procedures at the special
survey, intermediate survey and, in some cases, the annual survey.
The introduction of the Revised Regulations will affect the survey requirements as follows:
Docking Survey
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 14 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
MAINTENANCE SYSTEM Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I
Page -6- Approved by : Managing Director
One of the two docking surveys required in each five-year period should coincide with the
special survey.
For oil tankers, combination carriers and bulk cargo ships the Regulations no longer permit
the special survey to be carried out on a continuous survey basis.
Ships subject to enhanced survey procedures will also be required to maintain certain
documentation onboard for the lifetime of the vessel, regardless of a change in ownership
or management. The documentation, including a survey file with reports of structural
surveys and thickness measurements, will be examined by Class surveyors at Periodical
Surveys.
The survey file is to be used for maintaining in an orderly fashion the various classification
reports and other data which Class is required to place onboard a ship: structural survey
reports, thickness measurement reports and the Executive Summary. The Executive
Summary is a document for issue on completion of Special Surveys carried out in
accordance with the enhanced survey programme.
14.8 CSM
Planned Maintenance system should be made so that 20% of Machinery items are surveyed
each year.
WSM periodically sends vessel Class Survey Status Reports, Listings. These are to be perused and
surveys planned in consultation with the vessels Superintendents, to ensure that no item is left
overdue.
Should there be a reason for surveys (CSM), conditions, recommendations left overdue, it must be
brought to the attention of the vessels’ Superintendent, along with reasons and rectification
schedules.
Vessels’ Superintendent is to keep class informed of above and obtain extensions as and when
necessary.
The Hydraulic Planned Maintenance System is included in the SMMS PMS. The Master and the
Chief Engineer are responsible to implement this system. Each vessel should have an aggregate
pump and filter onboard to use as per this planned maintenance system. The luboil samples are to
be sent for particles count analysis to the address given in the SMMS / PMS.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 14 Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
MAINTENANCE SYSTEM Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL- PART I
Page -7- Approved by : Directors
i) Lubricating oil samples are to be landed for analysis at the intervals shown in SMMS/PMS
ii) Samples are to be landed for analysis at the first available opportunity in the event of any
suspected contamination by:
a) Sea Water.
b) Fresh Water.
c) Fuel Oil.
(!) iii) If any contamination is suspected, reasons for such suspicion and investigations carried out
are to be informed to Fleet Cell.
During routine decarbonising the lub-oil may be renewed provided it has been in use for a
considerable length of time.
In dry-dock, if the system has been drained for any reason, the lub-oil is to be re-filled prior
to the flooding of the dock
14.11.4 Others
Other luboil samples are to be sent to the laboratory of the contractor every six month.
(A) Form DE29 should be used for making job specification. This form is to be completed for
such items which are not within ship staff capabilities so that the repairs can be planned
during lay up period or during the forthcoming dry-dock and a copy mailed to WALLEM.
The outgoing Master and the Chief Engineer are to hand over the status report to the
incoming Master and the Chief Engineer.
1.5 Surveys
Make deck or engine repair requisition as applicable.
All repair requisitions for Guarantee Claims, Hull & Machinery damage repairs and
Stevedores damages etc. should be claimed accordingly. These repair reports
together with technician reports, times sheets, and spares used (as applicable)
along with invoices should be sent to the office from the first practicable port.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 14 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
MAINTENANCE SYSTEM Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I
Page -9- Approved by : Managing Director
These would be parts and items which if they are not on board when required would result
in an un acceptable loss (accident). These would not only be related to the safe operation
and pollution prevention, but also to “Loss to Process”.
Naturally there will have be a balance between cost of spares and stores and the
acceptance of a certain risk for a loss.
WALLEM are willing to accept certain risks, i.e. loss of time. However WALLEM are not
accepting any risk which is dangerous to personnel or the environment. Consequently a
machinery breakdown does not become a constant danger to safety, crew or environment.
All critical equipment has a back up, hence we do not need to stock spares for the critical
equipment.
Therefore, WALLEM believes that Masters and Chief Engineers must be aware of the
above policy and discuss minimum requirements with the vessel’s Superintendent. For
guidance, in respect to consumable stores, the vessel must be always stocked at
commencement of the voyage with Medicines as required by the Flag State for the “Ships
Medical Locker”.
In respect to environment the stock of oil pollution equipment as detailed in the vessels
VRP/NTVRP or SOPEP should be always carried.
Regarding spare parts, it is WALLEM’s understanding that large items to be maintained are
those listed in the maker’s recommendation or supply at new building.
The Flow-Chart in section 14.14.2 illustrate identification process for Measuring and Test
equipment, which requires periodic calibration. Equipment varies according to ship and
trade therefore the Flow-Chart is generic and not exhaustive in detailing items.
To comply with our management of Safety and Protection of the Environment and
minimising Process Loss all measuring equipment must be periodically proven, i.e.
calibrated and error if any is established and recorded.
The process of calibrating, measuring and test equipment requires documentation and
includes the details of:-
According to vessel type and requirements certain special measuring and/or monitoring
equipment is provide e.g.
The above mentioned equipment require periodic calibration and therefore sufficient
stocks of Calibration and spare gases should be held.
The date of routine calibration and result is to be noted in the Log. The frequency of
Calibration for the various equipment, and the authorised person to calibrate them is to
be specified in the log. Additionally each equipment is to have a tag with the date of the
last calibration. Ensure proper “Response Curves” for the equipment model and
calibration gases are held on board. A section of the log should include a list of spares
held on board and details of any repairs / maintenance done on the instrument.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 14 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
MAINTENANCE SYSTEM Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Feb 2013
MANUAL- PART I
Page - 11 - Approved by : Managing Director
14.14.2 Guidelines for identifying Measuring & Test equipment which requires Periodic
Calibration
Performing Pollution
Quality Safety
Inspection Prevention
E.g. Cargo
Monitoring Reliability of Equipment - Sudden
Ship failures of which will cause Hazardous
Cargo Temperatures
Performance Cargo Tank Pressures Situations - what is termed as
Criteria Cargo Pumping Rates
Cargo Tank Levels Critical Equipment & Critical Systems
Hydrometers ** ** ** ** **
The frequency of tests are specified in the Pre-loading Procedures, a standard is prior
loading and thereafter as required.
Tank Atmospheric Samplers Use Calibration gas & Response Curve as required prior
a specific operation or frequently if suspect.
The blank form is then filled on the computer , based on the discussion that took place as
above. Once the form is filled , the risk assessment form will be saved as part of Job
history.
Please refer to SMMS General letter 070 for detailing on editing of the Risk assessment
form and the procedure for verification of the Risk assessment for any Job.
14.16 Risk Assessemnt forms for ships with Other PMS Systems ( Non – SMMS )
Blank Risk assessment forms have been sent in excel format from the office along with a
couple of completed forms as samples. Printout of the blank form is to be taken and the
hazards and Risk mitigation measures are to be noted down.
The Form can then be filled in excel and printout taken and maintained on file.
Alternatively, vessels may file the handwritten Risk Assessment forms.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 15 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT PURCHASING 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -1-
SECTION 15 PURCHASING
15.1 General
The stores and spares requisitions should be made after checking Inventory, Planned
Maintenance and the Vessel’s Trading Pattern so that supplies can be made economically.
The Master is in-charge of purchasing provisions for the vessel, he may also purchase
minor items for maintenance through the ship chandler.
The Tankers on long voyages should plan their requirements at least one voyage in
advance so that items can be delivered on commencement of next voyage.
All requisitions on board are generated on the Computerised Onboard System and are
automatically numbered consecutively department-wise, with pre-fixes as follows.
Stores shall be stocked on a six-month basis and as far as practical Paints and Chemicals
on a three-month basis.
Requisitions for stores and spares are to be separate as also requisitions for spares from
different manufacturers / type of equipment.
If the supplies are made through non-standard supplier, vessels will be notified to take extra
care in checking the items before accepting the item.
Also on completion of storing the Master is to notify the office through the requisition form of
any non-conformity, of supplies including “poor quality” if applicable.
Vessel is to advise ship suppliers to arrange the stores with the minimum amount of plastic
wrapping possible. The Plastic and paper packing received with the stores to be returned to
the supplier to the maximum extent possible to avoid Garbage piling up on board.
Vessel can pick up Urgent stores such as Bio Degradable Garbage bags and PPE
(Personal Protective Equipment) Locally. Office is to be advised on departure regarding the
purchase.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 15 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT PURCHASING 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -2-
15.3.1 Requisitions are to be numbered in accordance with the details as per the
WALLEM – “Requisition System User Guide”, which is compatible with our
computerised spare parts requisition method.
15.3.2 Deck Department requisitions shall be prefixed with a letter "D" 4 digits
corresponding to
the sequential number.
15.3.3 Engine Department requisitions shall be prefixed with a letter "E" 4 digits
corresponding to the sequential number.
15.3.4 Electronics/Radio Department requisitions shall be prefixed with a letter "R" 4 digits
corresponding to the sequential number.
15.3.5 Catering Department requisitions shall be prefixed with a letter "C" 4 digits
corresponding to the sequential number.
15.3.6 If the ship is in urgent need of spares or stores, a faxed or telexed requisition may
be sent to WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD., with the correct departmental
prefix and 4-digit number.
15.3.7 Requisitions for stores and spares should be separate. Also requisitions for spares
for different Maker should be separate.
Requisitions Format will be similar to above but with prefix 'P' in front e.g. D0001 will be
PD0001 and RRD0001 will be PRRD0001 and will be Office generated.
Requisitions for all departments will have prefix "GR" in front e.g. D0001 will be
GRD0001 and E0001 will be GRE0001.
The JBA computerised requisitioning system will not handle Guarantee Claims per se. as
these would be sent directly to the relevant shipyard. However transportation claims for
the claim item will come under the purview of the JBA system and will be handled by the
office.
Any old usable spares should be tagged to reflect this fact to avoid any confusion.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 15 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT PURCHASING 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I Approved by : Managing Director
Page -3-
For Information
Requisitions-&
Master / Ch.Eng Sent to EDD by
Generates Basis E-Mail Floppy,
Requirements TX, Fax
Technical – Dept
For JBA –AS400 System
Approval Machinery Parts
Std.Machy.Manufacturers
Spare Parts with Code
Nos.
ISSA Codes
Paints/Chemicals
Purchase
Lubes- Gas.
Department For Standard suppliers Data
Quotations
Standard
Suppliers
Technical–
Dept. for Cost
Comparison Updates Computer data system
Quotations
Technical
Department Purchase
Co- Order
ordinates
For Accrual
Supply
Ship –
Technical Supplies
Department Effected
Goods –
Received For Invoice Matching
Master –
Ch.Eng format
Verifies Completed
Technical–Dept.
Marks / Enters
Supply Non
Conformities
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 16 Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & Checked by : Director (Marine)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT SAFETY MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev. Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL- PART I SYSTEM Approved by : Directors
Page - 1-
All officers and crew are required to undergo following STCW training course and hold valid
certificates: -
a) Fire Fighting
b) First Aid
c) Survival at Sea
d) Proficiency in survival craft
Additionally, tanker officers & crew are required to undergo tanker safety, chemical tanker
safety, and LPG safety as applicable.
16.3.1 On board, the Master is in charge and is assisted by the Second Officer. In the
office, Fleet Cell is the co-ordinator for giving necessary assistance and co-
ordinating any urgent medical assistance. They will liaise with Insurance
Department when P & I assistance is necessary.
16.3.2 The Second Officer is to maintain a Medical Log noting all medical attention
dispensed. The Master is to make it his routine to be aware of crew's health and
verify the Medical log by signing it on a weekly basis. Relevant sickness & all injury
cases are to be reviewed during vessel's safety committee meetings.
16.3.2 On board Safety Organisation is dealt with by the Ship's Safety Committee.
Details on the functions of this Committee are in Section 5 of this manual.
16.4.1.Company's Safety Manual gives comprehensive guidelines that are taken into
account in conjunction with ISGOTT.
16.4.2 Depending upon the type of cargo the vessel is carrying, instructions would be
issued by the charterers and or the commercial department of the Owners on
potential hazards that may be encountered and the preventive measures that is to
be taken. In case of any doubt or if the vessel requires further information, vessel is
to Contact WALLEM for Instructions.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 16 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT SAFETY MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL- PART I SYSTEM Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 2-
16.5.1 “Process safety” aspects of Cargo / Stores handling / Equipment and the work
environment must be monitored by the departmental heads and requisite notices
and work orders are to be issued. Adequate PPE for the hazard identified are to be
requisitioned and carried on board.
16.5.2. All officers and crew are supplied with boiler suits (recommended cotton and
orange colour) & safety shoes prior proceeding to the vessel. On board, they are
provided with safety helmet (with chinstrap), safety goggles, hearing protective aid
and safety gloves. They are also provided with cold weather gear. It is the
responsibility of the individual to whom these items are issued to maintain it in clean
and in good condition, always and stowed in the correct location.
Defective PPE must be brought to the attention of the department head who must
replace the same as deemed necessary. Safety Helmet head bands/supports must
be correctly fitted and adjusted to be effective. Similarly Safety Goggles must be of
good fit and anti-fog type.
16.5.3 All vessels have Material Safety Data Sheets for Chemicals, Lubricating oil,
Paints, FO, MDO and Crude Oil. These must be referred to for health hazards &
PPE advises.
16.5.4 All personnel will ensure that the correct use and operation of the tools are
adapted always. The department heads will ensure that ‘tool and equipment
safety” culture is followed by the personnel under their charge.
16.5.5 Should vessel trade to an area where special PPE against local health conditions
are necessary (e.g. palomoto moths), then the Master is to advise WALLEM and
obtain it locally or through WALLEM.
16.6.1 Prior joining a vessel, pre-employment medical as per Flag State requirements
along with drug and alcohol tests, for Tanker, OBO & PCC crews are done by
approved medical practitioners.
16.6.2 All seafarers are vaccinated against yellow fever prior joining the vessel.
16.6.3 Seafarers are urged to take necessary precautions whilst on leave against Illnesses
such as Malaria, etc. if it is prevalent in their home area.
Company notices on prevention of incurable transmitted diseases e.g. aids, hepatitis B are
available for making all staff aware of potential health risks involved.
Master verifies the pre-joining medical and D + A analysis report of a new joiner.
Employment health records are maintained in the office in each employee's file.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 16 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT SAFETY MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I SYSTEM Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 3-
Special attention is to be paid to ensure the presence of insects, moths, rodents and other
pests are controlled to prevent the transmission of illness and disease to seafarers and
other persons onboard.
16.10 Catering
The catering service in this Company is of high standard where ship staff participates in
managing the victualling.
All vessels are to have a mess committee to assist the Master in maintaining high
standards. The members of the mess committee would be for all department heads, the
PCO/ cook and selected junior officers/ engineers and crew. The Mess committee would
assist with suggestions in improving and maintaining high catering standard. The mess
committee is to meet as per vessels trading pattern but at least once a month. No records
of the minutes are required to be maintained.
The Second Officer is responsible to the Master for health and hygiene onboard. He is
the person on board designated to provide Medical First Aid.
He shall have satisfactorily completed training in Medical First Aid that meets the
requirements of the STCW convention as amended, which will enable him to take
immediate and effective action in case of accidents or illnesses that are likely to occur on
board and make use of medical advice obtained by radio or satellite communication.
He is to report to the Master details of sick persons with a description of their condition.
A list of those on the sick list with details of the complaint, symptoms and treatment given
is to be kept in the Medical Log. He is to present the Medical log to the Master on a
weekly basis for verification. He is responsible for the maintaining the Ship’s Medicine
Chest as per flag state requirements, replenishing stock as necessary and verifying that
all medicines on board are within their date of validity. He will maintain all medical records
and forms as per flag state requirements.
A Ship Master’s Report – To be completed by the ship’s master, assisted by the second
officer. This form should be filled in the ship’s medical log and provides a brief but
sufficiently comprehensive record of every medical case managed on board.
Ship’s hospital should be ready for immediate use. The ship’s hospital should not be
used as an additional cabin or used as a store room.
WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 16 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.93
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT SAFETY MANAGEMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL- PART I SYSTEM Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 4-
All vessels are supplied with medicines and equipment at least complying with flag state
requirement. Second Officer is in charge of keeping records and ordering medical supplies.
Wallem vessels are also required to carry an enhanced standard of medication to be
carried on board. Please refer to General letter No.6 in “Insurance” section of General
Letter for details.
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL
W A L L E M S(PART
H I P M A II)
NAGEMENT
NORWAY AS
HONG KONG
F`
S H I P B OA R D
M A N AG E M E N T M A N UA L
PA RT I I
EDITION NO.2
31-03-1998
SHIPBOARD
MANAGEMENT MANUAL
PA R T I I
EDITION NO.3
31 January 2006
WALLEM Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
CONTENTS Checked by : Director (Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Page -1- Approved by : Directors
CONTENTS
Section page no.
SIGNATURE CARD .......................................................................................................................................... 1
(!) REVISION SHEET ............................................................................................................................................ 1
(!) MANAGEMENT REVIEW ................................................................................................................................. 1
SIGNATURE CARD
(Master's Copy Only)
All Officers joining the ship must indicate that they have read and understood the contents of this
manual by signing below.
DATE NAME & RANK SIGNATURE DATE NAME & RANK SIGNATURE
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
SIGNATURE CARD Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL – PART II Page -2- Approved by : Managing Director
SIGNATURE CARD
(Master's Copy Only)
All Officers joining the ship must indicate that they have read and understood the contents of this
manual by signing below.
DATE NAME & RANK SIGNATURE DATE NAME & RANK SIGNATURE
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
REVISION SHEET Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : May 2014
MANUAL – PART II Page -1- Approved by : Managing Director
REVISION SHEET
When it becomes necessary to revise contents of this manual, the issue of a new page(s) in the
relevant section will be made. Amendments will be highlighted by (!) alongside the change in the left
border.
These revised pages will bear a revision number and date must be entered on this Revision Sheet
and initialled by the Master/Chief Engineer after insertion into the controlled copy held by them.
REVISED PAGES(S) MASTER/ REVISED MASTER/
CHIEF PAGES(S) CHIEF
ENGINEER ENGINEER
NO. DATE INITIALS NO. DATE INITIALS
Contents : All
Revision Sheet : All Dec 2014
Management Review: All
Section 2 : Pg. 2 & 6
Section 5 : All
Revision Sheet : Pg 2
Appendix I : RA D&C
(Index: Page 1) Jan 2016
Tanker 2 RA Form
added only
Contents : All
Revision Sheet : Pg.2 Dec 2016
Management review: All
Section 1 : Pg. 1, 5
WALLEM Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD MANAGEMENT REVIEW Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Page -1- Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
MANAGEMENT REVIEW
SECTION
DATE REMARKS INITIALS
REVIEWED
3/98 New Edition to incorporate new SEP rules and items DSH,
ALL nd IAC,GSM,
(2 Edition) from Masters Reviews and Findings from External AM, RKM
Audits KZ, GS
ALL 2/99 Reviewed, with no changes found necessary DSH
SECTION 1 COMMUNICATIONS
(!!) FOR THE CONTEXT OF THIS MANUAL, REPORTING/CONTACTING ‘WALLEM’ REFERS TO THE
RESPECTIVE ‘FLEETCELL ‘.
1.1 Purpose/Application
The purpose of this section is to describe procedures laid down by the Company with
regard to various Reports to be sent from the vessel to Wallem office. This covers a
broad range of Reports as well as reporting of accidents/incidents/technical problems,
surveys/inspections etc.
These procedures do not include reporting requirements of Owners and Charterers, which
should be followed as advised by them.
1.2 Responsibility
Vessel's Master is responsible for having the reports prepared and transmitted by tlx/fax
or by e-mail.
1. On VHF DSC channel 70, if the ship, in accordance with the requirements of
Regulation 7.1.2 is fitted with a VHF radio installation
2 On the distress and safety DSC frequency 2,187.5 kHz, if the ship, in
accordance with the requirements of regulation 9.1.2 or 10.1.3, is fitted with an
MF radio installation;
3 On the distress and safety DSC frequency 2,187.5 kHz and 8,414.5 Khz and
also on at least one of the distress and safety DSC frequencies 4,207.5 kHz,
6,312 kHz, 12,577 kHz or 16,804.5 kHz, appropriate to the time of day and the
geographical position of the ship, if the ship, in accordance with the
requirements of regulation 10.2.2 or 11.1, is fitted with an MF/HF radio
installation. This watch may be kept by means of a scanning receiver.
4. For satellite shore-to-ship distress alerts, if the ship, in accordance with the
requirements of regulation 10.1.1, is fitted with an INMARSAT ship earth station.
5. Every ship, while at sea, shall maintain a radio watch for broadcasts of maritime
safety information on the appropriate frequency or frequencies on which such
information is broadcast for the area in which the ship is navigating.
6. Every ship while at sea shall maintain, when practicable, a continuous listening
watch on VHF channel 16. This watch shall be kept at the position from which
the ship is normally navigated.
7. Every Ship in port to keep On and monitor EGC and Navtex for safety and
weather broadcasts. Vessel will also check facsimiles for weather synopsis and
forecasts.
WALLEM SECTION 1 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
COMMUNICATIONS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -2-
The mode of messaging is always selected by the Originator of the message having due
regard to the content and the importance of the message. E-Mail is the preferred mode of
messaging. Large amount of data can be transferred economically with Email.
Any urgent matters with respect to safety, pollution, technical or crewing arising
about which WALLEM should be advised, are to be reported by phone.
Following are the different modes of communication from the vessel to the shore.
Vessels are required to dial into the Hong Kong Hub “at least two to three times
everyday”. No Exceptions
1. All routine traffic from shore to ship or ship to shore is exchanged by e-mail.
2. “To” Email Field : Should be used for the person or the address to which the email is
directed. The Email should be addressed to the concerned departments email
address. When sending message on Technical and Marine issues, the E-mail
address of the Fleet Cell(Vessel control group) is to be used (Example:
VC_VesselA1@wallem.com). Email messages should not be addressed to individual
Email ID of the superintendents.
3. In the case of Data Files, Please note that system data files required by WALLEM
are to be sent to the Designated Email address. The file may not be readable at other
addresses.
4. “CC” field on Email : Should be used for those addressed indirectly.
5. BC Field on Email : This is to be used sparingly, as main recipients are not informed
about these recipients.
6. Always ensure “subject” field has vessel’s name first and then topic.
7. It is recommended that ships reply back Email ID is noted below the Master Name at
the end of the message.
Other Information
1. E-mail Messages should only be for text messages. Use the inverted pyramid form
of writing. The most important statement should appear in the first paragraph. Follow
up with supporting details. If the message is lengthy, use sub heading within the
email message and refer to sub topics in the first paragraph.
2. Messages can be sent as attachments in Word or Excel or PDF or Tiff or JPEG files
only when the Reports cannot be sent as plain text in the Email or if the Report is in
the form of a Table or has drawing attached.
WALLEM SECTION 1 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
COMMUNICATIONS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -3-
It is recommended that all attachments are zipped prior being attached to the E-
Mail as this reduces the size of the attachment and reduces the transmission time.
SMMS Export files are not to be zipped.
FACSIMILE Vs E-Mail
Facsimile to be only used if the E-Mail system is not working.
TELEX
Sat C is the normal means of sending telex message if E-Mail is not working. Some
vessels may have Sat B which can also be used for sending telex messages. Fleet 77
does not provide a direct connection to the telex network.
.
E-MAIL BY TELEX
For one single text message to office or any other party, the E-Mail mode of Sat C can be
used. However, the subject has to be filled correctly and in the proper format in this mode
of message delivery as per example below. Email in SAT C to be sent using code 67 or
code 63 and in the format given below:
To+ xxxx@wallem.com
cc+ xxxx@wallem.com
Subject+ Vessel Name - Weather routing for next voyage
Ships Name to be written in subject field preceding the content in the subject field.
TELEPHONE
IMPORTANT
2. All routine communication to be effected using e-mail and through the contracted service
providing station.
3. Fancy fax headers not to be used and each page to be numbered when sending by Fax.
Drawings, Matrices, and Tables can be sent as attachments to e-mail or by Fax. Vessel is to
determine the cheaper mode of delivery, which would depend on the size of the attachment.
Vessel is to decide this on a case-by-case basis and then send by Fax or email accordingly
4. Ships provided with Cellular telephone & fax, should use it when in range.
WALLEM SECTION 1 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
COMMUNICATIONS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -5-
Note: The following instructions (Sections 1.6-1.9) constitute the minimum requirement for
(!) reporting by vessels to FleetCell. Operational parameters may necessitate changes / amendments to
the reporting format, which will be advised to the relevant vessel(s) by Area and/or Head Office.
1.6 System Reports
Following are various System Reports that are to be sent by E-Mail
1.6.1 Vessel Movement Report
This consists of Noon Report, Arrival Reports, Departure Reports, Agency Report, Vessel In Port
Report and Awaiting Berthing Report. All the Reports mentioned are in One excel file. The data is to
be fed into the Report and a VRM File Generated. The Generated file is to be sent to the designated
Address VRMDATA. Instructions for preparing the reports are provided with the
software.
Agent’s details need to be sent in the standard format of the Agency report to Vessel Movement mail
box. This must be done even if a separate email with agent’s details has been sent in normal E-mail
mode to the office.
Agents details sent to the designated mailbox allow access to this information for all departments.
This would allow for dispatch of Crew mail, stores, and spares etc in timely manner.
In ADDITION, WALLEM WILL HAVE IMMEDIATE ACCESS OVER THE INTERNET TO THE
VESSELS POSITION AND AGENT DETAILS IN AN EMERGENCY.
Assistance and services may be delayed where vessels are not regularly updating VMR with
departure, daily, arrival and agents reports.
1.6.2 TPS (Total Procurement Solution) System Files (For Requisitions & GRA Files)
Vessels are using the RQA system for Generating Requisitions and sending the Good Received
acknowledgement Files. This is to be sent to the Designated Email Address, which has been sent by
ISD Department. Please Refer to RQA instruction manuals or the Help section of the RQA CD for
operation instructions.
5. In case of any urgent matter about personnel, please contact Fleet Personnel.
Whenever any of the above takes place, office to be advised with attending surveyors name
along with his contact details, the company that he represented and the organisation on whose
behalf he carried out the inspection. Please note that Port state authorities may carry out
unscheduled inspections
In the case of class surveys, Vessel should Report the name of certificate renewed or survey
carried out.
In all the above cases, the recommendations and the Planned action on the recommendations to
be sent to the office. The Recommendation can be scanned and sent as attachment or faxed to
the office.
No unauthorised access or inspection of the vessel or its Class Records is to be allowed
unless cleared by Owners or Managers.
Whenever change of Master or Chief Engineer has taken place, same to be reported, confirming
hand over procedures followed with copy to owners. The Charterers (if any) also are to be duly
advised of the Change of Command.
WALLEM SECTION 1 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
COMMUNICATIONS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -7-
In addition to the departure Message in the Vessel Movement File, a message to be sent to the
concerned FP departments with following Information (as Applicable)
Vessels to send Daily updates while at Yard with Report prepared by Superintendent / Master /
Chief Engineer.
Following Month End Reports are to be sent as required. The Reports given below is only a
sample list and additional reports maybe required by various departments managing the ship and
vessel to comply with it. It is suggested that vessels prepare a list of Month end Reports
required to be sent in a tabulated column with various Email Addresses and this list to be
updated as required:
** Month end Reports may vary between different fleets due to nature of requirement of
Owners. Vessels are requested to follow the Format sent by the Superintendent / Fleet
Manager and follow the Instructions therein. Please prepare a tabulated list as mentioned
above.
WALLEM SECTION 1 Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
COMMUNICATIONS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -8-
The Master is free to send other reports/information as he find necessary or relevant. For
instance any change in communication capabilities or cash requirement in forthcoming port
should be informed to the concerned departments.
Any query or information required on the SMMS system or the PMS system on board to be sent
to SMMS@wallem.com
WALLEM SECTION 1 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
COMMUNICATIONS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -9-
Unless specified with written instructions to your vessel, all vessels are to route all messages to
the Fleet Cell
WALLEM SECTION 1 Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
COMMUNICATIONS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 10 -
# Description Explanation
1 Do not compromise We have experienced two serious navigational accidents because
Navigational Safety Master left the wheelhouse in one case to send departure message to
to send messages Charterers and in another where Master handed con to 3/0 to explain
AMVER messageing to 2/O.
2 Don't assume email Email is generally delivered in seconds, but on some occasions it can be
will be actioned delayed by hours.
immediately Also, regardless of when it is delivered, the recipient may not read/action it
immediately depending on their own priorities. So if you need an immediate
response, use the telephone, or if it is a colleague, speak to them directly.
3 Address email The correct use of "TO"; "CC" and "BC" can improve the chances of getting
correctly the desired response:
• TO: should be used for the person(s) to whom the email is actually
directed – those requiring the information or those from whom you require
a response.
• CC: should be used for those addressed indirectly – typically "for your
information" type messages. Try to limit the usage here, as these are the
messages which add the least value to the communication process and
can often generate more unnecessary messages as a result.
• BC: This should be used sparingly, as the main recipients are not
informed about these BC recipients and over-use can be interpreted as
being underhand or unethical.
4 Address email Distribution Lists can simplify the task of addressing emails, but if over-used
sparingly result in too many people receiving messages that are actually irrelevant.
Similarly, the Reply-to-All option typically generates far more messages than
are actually required in most situations. Try to avoid it altogether.
5 Include a strong Think of your subject line as the headline of an important news article.
subject line Make sure the subject line is short, informative & to-the-point
6 Ask for an action Always specify what you want to happen as a result of the email – particularly
if it is addressed TO: more than one person.
7 Use the inverted Your most important statements should appear in the first paragraph. Follow
pyramid form of writing up with supporting details.
Especially if the message is lengthy, use sub-topic headings within your email
message, and then refer to the subtopics in your first paragraph.
8 Keep sentences and An email is not a novel so get straight to the point.
paragraphs short for Be concise, including only relevant information and avoiding jargon and
easy reading acronyms if they might confuse any recipients.
Remember, many recipients may not have English as their first, or even
second language.
9 Limit attachments Keep attachment sizes to a minimum – otherwise they can be time-
consuming and/or expensive to download.
Similarly, don't copy out an entire, long message just to add a line or two of
text such as "I agree" or "Noted."
Remember to identify the type of files attached if they are not standard MS
Office documents.
Remember to use the original soft-copy of a document (e.g. .DOC; .PPT; etc)
if it is available rather than creating a scanned image of a print out.
Also, most MS Office files like these can be "Zipped" to a much smaller size
before being included as attachments.
10 Think about your As well as being concise, remember some key Do's:
writing style • Do be polite. Terseness can be misinterpreted. In particular, it is a good
rule of thumb never to reply to an email when you are angry.
WALLEM SECTION 1 Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
COMMUNICATIONS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 11 -
# Description Explanation
• Do trim any quoted message down as much as possible.
• Do use humour sparingly. Remember that email has no visual clues
about emotions, which can lead to problems with interpretation.
and Don'ts:
• Don't write ALL IN CAPITALS – it is usually interpreted as bad manners
• Don't over-use punctuation ("!!"), especially if your email is quite formal.
• Don't use an over-elaborate signature on your email message (Name,
Title, )
• Don't mark things as urgent if they aren't
• Don't request delivery & read receipts. This will almost always annoy your
recipient before they have even read your message.
11 Use the spell check Particularly for messages to outside parties, this shows a professional attitude
and also ensures the message says exactly what you meant it to say.
12 Re-read your message Apart from a final check on spelling and grammar, reading your email through
one last time before the eyes of the recipient will help you send a more effective message and
you send avoid misunderstandings and inappropriate comments.
13 Don't print One of the goals of email is to reduce the amount of paper in use. There will
unnecessarily always be a percentage of documents that need to be held in hard-copy but
wherever possible organize your personal workflow and filing to use the
electronic copy rather than creating a paper copy.
14 Is a reply required? Generally, you should reply if:
• You are asked a question or a response from you is solicited directly
• If you feel you can/should add or correct information on the points raised
Generally you should not reply if:
• You are included in the “CC:” or “BC:” and neither of the points above
apply
• The original message is clearly just distributing general information
15 Reply Promptly The sender is waiting for a response so always reply promptly.
In general, a response should be sent within 1 working day, but if the full reply
may not be available within this timeframe, consider sending a prompt
response confirming that you have received their email and indicating when
you expect to reply fully. Note, since expressions such as “shortly”;
“Soonest”; “ASAP”; etc are not helpful, they should be avoided. Give a
genuine timescale.
16 Don't Forward Delete spam, chain letters, and other unsolicited mail immediately.
unnecessarily If you receive unsolicited warnings about viruses etc., be aware that the vast
majority of these are hoaxes and do not be tempted to forward them to other
people. You may, if you believe they are genuine, forward them as an
attachment to isdhelpdesk@wallem.com for further scrutiny.
17 Don't keep messages This is especially important for messages with large attachments. If the
in your email account attachment is the important content, then SAVE this to the file server and
too long delete the email message.
WALLEM SECTION 1 Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
COMMUNICATIONS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2012
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 12 -
The Owners or their commercial or operational department would advise their reporting
procedures which are to be strictly followed. Similarly, the charterers reporting
procedures are to be strictly complied with.
The Master should advise the Agents with timely notices as per owners / charterers
instructions. Owners may appoint an owners protective agent for Husbandry matters. The
Husbandry requirements are to be sent to the Protective agent or the charters agent as
applicable with copy to office.
Owners Commercial department / Agents may require Certificates / other documents to be sent
by Email. The required documents are to be scanned and then sent as attachment.
The details mentioned herein are for guidance only. Office will inform of any changes
that maybe promulgated from time to time. Please check with Agents for updates and
changes in any of the rules.
1.16.1 ENOA/D Reports ( ENOA is also called ANOA which stands for Advance Notice of
Arrival)
Initial E-NOA to be prepared using latest software (infopath) and submitted at the earliest once
discharge port is confirmed and / or when vessel has sailed from Load port Confirmation email
would be received stating that E-NOA has been uploaded with a confirmation ID. ENOA update
is to be submitted if ETA changes by more than 6 hrs or 96hrs prior arrivals.
Important : The ship must submit eNOA/D to enoad@nvmc.uscg.gov
Please refer to the detailed instructions provided with the software for correctly filling and
submitting the ENOA / Updates /ENOD Reports.
ENOA/D must be sent to the USCG, but may be copied to Witt|O’Briens at
noad@wittobriensrm.com” so that they keep track of vessel's movements whilst in the US.
Please note the following requirement, as listed in 33 CFR 160.212, which is as follows:
If your voyage time is less than 96 hours, you must submit your NOA before departure. In
addition, if your voyage is 24 hours or less, you must submit your NOA 24 hours in advance.
Examples: If your voyage is 72 hours, you must submit your NOA before departure. If your
voyage is 18 hours, then you must submit your NOA 24 hours before arrival.
WALLEM SECTION 1 Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
COMMUNICATIONS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Mar 2013
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 13 -
If the Report has not been submitted in Time, Considerable delay can be caused to the
vessel. Also, any mistakes in the details fed into the ENOA could result in delays and
fines to the vessel. Hence, the ENOA and its updates are to be filled up diligently and in
time.
For each port or place in the United States to be visited list the names of the receiving facility,
the port or place, the city, and the state and; the name and telephone number of a 24-hour
point of contact. The Agents are to be mentioned as local contacts in the ENOA/D. Without a
local contact or contact that can be reached quickly, the USCG will not be able to solve minor
issues prior to entry and the vessel may get delayed.
Liberian flag vessels should copy every ANOS ( Arrival NOA ) to NOA@liscr.com
When visiting multiple U.S. ports, a new initial ANOA is to be filed for the next US port. The
initial ANOA for the first port is not to be updated. Each ANOA submitted via INFOPATH must
be an individual or "initial" NOA. This is because the system is setup to require a new arrival
notice for each port call. Although this may appear more cumbersome, the eNOA/D is designed
to allow you to 'copy' all the non-unique data over to a new notice, requiring minimal effort to
add an additional port of call to a voyage.
REMINDER
USCG informs that delays can be easily avoided if the ANOAs are submitted correctly
and the Cleared to Enter list is reviewed. Please request the agent to check the “Cleared
to Enter List “ensure that vessels name is in the list to avoid delays and fines.
ICB (International Carrier bond) is a bond placed by charterers for cargo purposes and for crew
purposes The AMS (Automated Manifest system) filing by agents on behalf of charterers is
done based on this ICB.
The APIS system relates to crew and passenger manifest. This also requires an ICB to be in
place. T the charterers ICB can also be used for this purpose. However, in case the charterers
and owners do not have agreement to use charterers ICB for APIS purposes, then owners ICB
would be required and is to be used. In case of any doubt, contact Owners office with copy to
WALLEM
If there is any ballast on board from load port, deep seas ballast exchange to be done. Latest
Ballast water form to be filled and sent as attachment to NBIC with copy to agents. Or faxed to
NBIC
The latest ballast water exchange from is available in the SMS DVD.
1.16.4 QI Reporting
For tankers, if vessel has not been carrying out quarterly QI notification, QI notification to be
done no less than 72 hr prior entry to U.S.Exclusive Economic Zone. QI Notification exercise
sheet in the VRP (Sec 7) is to be filled up. Retain the completed notification sheet in File
WALLEM SECTION 1 Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
COMMUNICATIONS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : June 2007
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 14 -
Please check with Agents for Reporting as required by various countries and Ports and carry
out Reporting as required. Please check the Ballast Exchange Manual for details on Reporting
on Ballast water exchange to various authorities as required. (Ex: Canada, Australia require
Deep Sea Ballast exchange & Reporting)
WALLEM SECTION 2 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
TAKEOVER GUIDELINES 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -1-
Normally, 2 observers will join the vessel prior to her sea trial for new building or for one voyage
before takeover of an existing ship into the management. This may be waived in certain cases and
the decision to not have observers would be taken by the Technical Director in consultation with
Safety Department.
The insurance cover for the observers would be obtained by the Insurance Department.
The observers would watch all operations and familarise themselves with the vessel. However,
they will not interfere or get involved with any operations.
One of the observers would fill the Designated Ship Security Assessment(SSA) form and send it to
the office/ superintendent. This would have the various details and is essential for preparing the
SSP.
The superintendent nominated for the takeover will co-ordinate the new building or the takeover.
He will be guided by the contents of Section 18 of the Technical manual.
As required, a office Superintendent will be nominated to sail on board soon after vessel takeover,
as a system implementer to guide and assist Master & Ch. Engineer in setting up company SMS.
He will also ensure that company Marpol compliance requirements are in effect.
The Interim audits would be arranged for the vessel from the office.
The Interim audit would normally be done on the day of takeover or a day later.
During the Interim ISM audits, the auditor would check the following:
1. All the Ships certificates are in order
2. All the licences of the staff are in order(Flag state/National/medical fitness certificates are
valid.) ( CRA’s are valid).
3. All the Manuals and publication required by the Companies SMS system are on board.
4. Muster list has been drawn up and crew are familiar with their emergency duties.
5. In certain cases, the auditor may require the crew to carry out a drill.
6. Copy of DOC on board
7. Time schedule for full implementation of SMS leading up to initial audit is to be available on
board.
Once the Interim audits are completed, the vessel would need to set up the SMS system in due
time as the initial audit would need to be carried out in 6 months time.
Important Notes on CSR
Upon taking over, Master’s are to confirm to Fleet Cell that all original CSR’s issued to the vessel
in serial order of document number as well as form 2 and 3 for each original CSR are available on
board. Send a copy of the latest CSR in order for the office to apply to the flag administration for a
new CSR.
WALLEM SECTION 2 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
TAKEOVER GUIDELINES 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -2-
Target
Completion
# PROCEDURES date after
Date or N/A
takeover
1. Ballast water management File to maintain records of various forms from 7 day
the manual. Training records of concerned crew to be prepared
4. After initial familiarization of company SMS, all officers to sign the 15 day
Master’s control copy of SBM Part I & II, Safety manual, VRP or NTVRP,
SOPEP, SOLAS LSA / Fire Fighting Training Manual and Bridge procedures
manual (Deck officers only).
6. Distribute all Manuals and publications after labeling them as per the 15 days
Document Control and Distribution list in SBM Part I Section 2 page 3.
Vessel will have 1 hard copy and two E-Manuals CD. One E-Manuals CD
would be with Chief officer and the other with the Chief Engineer. E
manuals to be installed on shared folder on networking, if applicable.
7. Prepare filing system for Master, C/E, Chief Officer, Bridge as per the 15 days
Filing system in SBM Part I section 2 page 7; Files are to be prepared as
per the list provided even if the files are initially empty.
9. Following Plans/manuals to be prepared and sent for office approval: Bio 30 days
fouling management Plan and record book, Marpol annex VI procedure
manual, Ship Energy efficiency management plan,
BRIDGE OPERATIONS
# PROCEDURES REMARK Completion
Date or N/A
procedures displayed.
6. ETA booklet to be prepared and kept on Bridge/CCR/ Fore peak store 7 day
SAFETY PROCEDURES
# PROCEDURES REMARK Completion
Date or N/A
2. Safety Manual Permits to work for Hot work, Enclosed space entry, 3 day
Permits to work for working Aloft / over side, electrical installation, work
on Pipeline and pressure vessels and permit for diving operations are to
be issued for respective work. Original is to be filed on board.
3. The SCABA sets and Fireman’s suits are to have a Hanging arrangement. 7 days
4. Bridge fire wallet: Fire control plan, GA + Capacity plan, A4 size 7 days
emergency muster List, crew list, MCCM communication details.
5. Copies of checklist from MCCM to be used during each emergency drills 7 days
and filled out for each drill. Copies to be filed. File with blank checklist to
be kept on bridge for easy reference.
6. Place Fire Control plan, Cargo MSDS, Stowage plan, Port Contact details 7 days
and Crew list in Fire wallet at Gangway.
8. Prepare the Yearly programme of emergency drill from the Safety 7 days
Manual. Post copy on bridge & deck log book and follow up with drills as
per the schedule drawn.
9. “No Smoking in bed” and “Read Safety Publication” stickers to be posted 7 days
in each cabin.
WALLEM SECTION 2 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
TAKEOVER GUIDELINES 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -4-
10. All Fire drills are to be evaluated, Debriefing of crew done for 7 days
improvements and Copies of the evaluation sheets from the Safety
Manual to be filled and filed along with the drill checklists.
12. MSDS to be posted at relevant locations (Paint and Chemical stores) for 7 days
Paint, Chemicals, Foam solution, L.O., HFO/D.O. Bunker samples and
cargo samples. Copy of MSDS sheets to be available on file with C/E and
Chief officer.
13. Safe working practice posters and notices sent from the office are to be 7 days
posted at conspicuous and relevant locations.
16. Safety Committee meetings to be held as per Page 1 of Section 5 of SBM 30 days
I. Records to be maintained in File 18 (Masters Filing System).
17. Prepare Plans and procedure for recovery of Persons from the water and 30 days
send for office approval.
4. The Ship specific Flow chart for Handling and Disposal of Garbage to be 7 days
highlighted on commencement of the Garbage Management Manual
and Record Book. Sec B of Garbage management manual with ship
specific information is to be filled up.
WALLEM SECTION 2 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
TAKEOVER GUIDELINES 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -5-
6. Chief engineer to open the overboard line of OWS and inspect the same 15 days
if taking over vessel from different management. OWS piping should be
as per original drawing and no unauthorized connection/magic pipes in
the system. WMCP C/L to be completed and send for office records with
all pictures and findings if any. The OWS discharge line flanges to be
sealed with numbered seal provided and seal number to be noted in
logbook.
8. All portable pipes are to be kept in a locker or locked box along with a 30 days
record book. The box/locker should have two locks and the key should
be with the Master and chief officer.
HEALTH PROCEDURES
# PROCEDURES REMARK Completion
Date or
N/A
2. All vessels to have a emergency drug-sampling kit, which can take at For
least 10 samples. Information
4. Prepare a Medical log book from normal A4 notebook and record each 7 days
and every case of reported illness/ injury, with name, rank, illness/injury
type and medicine dispensed.
5. Posters of Drug and alcohol policy of the company are to be posted at 7 days
relevant locations.
8. Form D8 is to be used for any sick crew who visits doctor. The 15 days
completed forms are to be sent to the company.
WALLEM SECTION 2 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
TAKEOVER GUIDELINES 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -6-
9. Random testing of watch keepers to be carried out with breath analyzer 30 days
as per SBM I section 13 page 1. Records are to be maintained in Drug
and Alcohol logbook.
3. Chief Engineer is to issue written orders for Welding and gas cutting 7 days
safely and these orders are to be posted in the workshop along with
precautions from Safety manual Chapter 11 page 3/14. Date completed:
1. All restricted areas are to be identified as per SSP and restricted area 3 day
notice to be stenciled at the entrance to each area as given in SSP.
2. Prepare the Yearly program of security drill from the SSP Manual. 7 day
3. Briefing for all personnel on their duties and relevant section of SSP. 7 days
Date completed:
6. Establish Key control and start Key Register as per ISPS 7 days
WALLEM SECTION 2 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
TAKEOVER GUIDELINES 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -7-
3. Master to check all OEC and CRA for flag state are in order. Completed in
Appendix C
4. DNV Navigator to be installed and crew to start filling their work and Completed in
rest hours. Appendix C
7. Annual Drinking water test records available on board else send 7 days
water for analysis.
10. Crew given a signed copy of work and rest hours along with Wage Month end
slips.
WALLEM SECTION 2 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
TAKEOVER GUIDELINES 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -8-
2.5 BLANK
WALLEM SECTION 2 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
TAKEOVER GUIDELINES 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -9-
2.6 BLANK
WALLEM SECTION 2 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
TAKEOVER GUIDELINES 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page - 10 -
(!) All Wallem supplied items are to be returned to the respective vendors. Examples are Any Special
Telephone systems and Gas bottles on board. However, this is subject to the mutually signed MOU
between the Owners/sellers and the buyers.
If there are any pending insurance claims or legal cases, Fleet Cell will advise the vessel on the copies
of log book pages that would be required.
Please use your discretion and follow the instructions below after the date & time of handover has been
confirmed.
AA) Re Amos Connect system, the software should be removed and returned to Mr. Daniel Cheng
of ISD.
BB) Is the vessel equipped with VOD (Videotel on demand) or the traditional Videotel library
consisting of safety video tapes of CDs?
In either case, please pack the equipment and land them at the next convenient port and
address it to:
Videotel Marine International, 84, Newman Street, London W1T 3EU (Tel: +44 207 299 1818).
CC) IF VESSEL IS FITTED WITH CHARTCO EQUIPMENT, the ChartCo decoder which is on rental
and should be returned to:
ChartCo Limited
Kathleen Walsh
Tel: +44 (0)20 8267 0003
Fax:+44 (0)20 8267 0004
e-mail: kathleen.walsh@chartco.com
ChartCo Limited
Incorporated in England No: 3652059
Postal Address: New North Road, Hainault, Ilford, Essex, IG6 2UR United Kingdom.
Please mark the name of the vessel clearly outside the box and mark "Items of UK origin, of no
commercial value" on the box.
Please request the Agents to send the box to UK by courier and send details of despatch (AWB No) to
Marine Superintendent.
The reason for the above instructions is that in the past, vessels have landed Videotel library and it has
remained with Agents without a trace. We have had to continue paying rentals.
The instructions below to be complied with only once the handover date is confirmed and just prior
handover:
(!) 1. On handover , the following software is to be deleted & installation disks to be returned to ISD
Requisition RQF software , FPB software , and Radio Accounting software installed - please uninstall
and return the installation disks to the concerned department.
(!) 2. SMMS : Please uninstall SMMS program & software and return the original CDs & Hardware Lock
to WSM . Please take a full back up of the PMS and send to office.
WALLEM SECTION 2 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
TAKEOVER GUIDELINES 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page - 11 -
3. Professional software applications such as NTC Squat, Passage Planner, etc are to be erased from
PC hard drives. The same applies to OCIMF SIRE VPQ & IMT MESC CD Rom SMS
documentation DVD and WSM eManual CD.
4. On handover, please return original SMC and ISSC to Marine superintendent for cancellation, and
destroy DOC copy held on board.
5. Vessel has Flag issued Minimum manning certificate and CLC 1992 naming Registered Owners -
to return to Marine superintendent along with COFRs.
( * To remain on board if owners remain the same, i.e. only management change).
6. SOPEP to remain onboard after removing the appendices which have WALLEM WSM contact
details. VRP or NTVRP (if on board) original and CD to return to Marine superintendent. (( * To
remain on board if owners remain the same).
7. All Wallem posters to be removed without causing poor appearance , otherwise let them remain.
8. Destroy entire filing system except PMS, which is to be handled as per (2). When destroying files,
please use your discretion during disposal, as you would undoubtedly require that some documents
remain available until actual date of handover.
Note: If officers wish to carry back any WALLEM WSM manuals with them as personal reference
copies,
they are welcome to do so. However, please ensure the revision page in each is marked with the
notice "Uncontrolled Copy".
10. All Oil Record Books (I & II) which are less than three years old to be returned to office. Destroy all
ORB's more than 3 years old.
11. Latest Wallem Deck/Engine Log books and Movement book to be returned to Marine
superintendent, others destroyed.
12. Cargo papers - understand these should be in envelopes by voyage nos. Keep on board.
13. Trading Certificates - please follow instructions from Class.
14. Flag State manning documents - Official log book, Crew Articles, Minimum Safe Manning Cert,
ITF blue card, etc to be returned to FP at WSM HK.
15. Videotel Safety Library & CD-Roms : Return to Videotel.
16. Other professional videos - to remain onboard.
17. All original CSRs to remain on board.
Please advise Fleet Cell date and time of vessel leaving WSM management in order to cease services
such as SSAS, NTMs, etc.
If new managers require, you would need to leave photocopy of latest log book & ORB's on board.
Critical equipment and systems are those, where sudden loss of functional capability or where failure to
respond, when activated manually or automatically may create a high-risk situation or accident.
Critical equipments for the ships are determined after a careful risk assessment in the office. The risk
assessment is in the office manual and the table in the next page details the critical equipment.
Critical equipment and Systems are to be marked as critical in the SMMS. If any component is
there in more than one department, e.g Engine and Deck, then it should be marked in both the
department.
Critical equipment details in SMMS to include its maintenance procedure, frequency, testing
routines under the responsible Officer’s access domain.
The following pages list Critical Equipment and Systems. The remark column is to be completed to
state where details of appropriate tests and other procedures, which should be developed to ensure
functional reliability or the use of alternate arrangements in the event of sudden failure, are available.
The testing of stand-by equipment and arrangement should assist in ensuring that a single failure does
not cause the loss of a critical ship function that could lead to an accident.
Whenever maintenance is to be carried out on the critical equipment, office permission is to be taken,
as mentioned below:
1. In case of Main Engine jobs of Overhaul of Units, Fuel pumps & Turbocharger and Opening up
of Main, Crankpin and Crosshead bearing permission for office is required. For all other jobs
there will be no need to obtain permission from office.
2. In case of Cargo pipelines & valves; job of renewal of bolts or clamps, when no hot work
is involved, office permission is not required.
1. When requesting for permission, risk assessment in standard company format is to be sent.
The estimated shutdown period to be mentioned. The shutdown period should not exceed 12
hours.
2. If it is felt any time during the work that the approved work period will be exceeded, then
permission from office to be obtained for extension. The original risk assessment is to be
reviewed and resubmitted or a new risk assessment is to be submitted when requesting
extension.
3. Chief Engineer in consultation with Master can shutdown the equipment if there is breakdown
or to prevent a breakdown, without informing the office. In such case office is to be informed
immediately after the shutdown.
SECTION 3
WALLEM Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
CRITICAL EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS Checked by : Director (Marine)
RISK ASSESSMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
CRITICAL OPERATIONS
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -2-
CRITICAL EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION REMARKS
Emergency Fire Pump
Emergency Generator
CRITICAL SYSTEMS
LEFT BLANK
WALLEM SECTION 3 Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
CRITICAL EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT CRITICAL OPERATIONS Rev.No. / Date : March 2011
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -4-
CRITICAL SYSTEMS
LEFT BLANK
WALLEM SECTION 3 Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
CRITICAL EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT CRITICAL OPERATIONS Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2013
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -5-
RISK ASSESSMENT
Vessels are to refer to Appendix 1 of this manual (Risk Assessment for critical operations). The company
uses the simple risk estimator 5 x 5 as given in Appendix 1 of this manual. Vessels are to be guided by
this for identifying risk and the control measures.
The Risk Assessment form has been developed by the company and is available in the SMS
documentation DVD.
Critical operation has been identified in Section3 of this SBM II. The company Risk assessment for critical
operations are also available in Appendix 1 of this SBM II. The hazard/ Risk identification and control
measures for all other operations/ jobs are available in Appendix 2 of SBM II.
The Changes to ISM Code detailed in Resolution MSC.273(85) requires the company to assess of all
identified risks to its ships, personnel and the environment and establishing appropriate safeguards or
control measures. This has been done by carrying out an assessment of Critical operation in Chapter 3 of
SBM II. The Risk assessment has been done for all critical operation and is available in Appendix 1 of
SBM II. The Hazard / Risk identification and the control measure for all other operations are available in
Appendix 2 of SBM II.
Critical Operations and conditions are those, which has a significant risk of causing injuries or illness to
people, or damage to the ship, cargo, other property and/or the environment.
The following pages list operations and conditions, which could be, categorised Critical. The list is not in
order of importance, and it is to be further understood that operations are not only limited to what is listed
as they would be others specific to type of vessel and or trade engaged.
To Comply with the changes to the ISM code detailed in Resolution MSC.273(85), risk assessment has
been carried for each Special and Critical operation. The Risk assessment is available in Appendix 1 of
this manual. In certain cases, a checklist is available for critical operations. If a checklist is available, no
Company Risk Assessment has been carried out. Vessels are to review the risk identified and the control
measures or verify the items in the checklist prior carrying out any Critical or special operations. If the
vessel is carrying out a unusual job which is not included in the list of jobs mentioned, the department
head to carry out a Risk assessment as per the sample in the SMS DVD and maintain records.
Bridge Team management whilst under pilotage Hazard / Risk factors control measures in
Appendix II of this manual
Change over hand/auto steering (testing once per Hazard / Risk factors control measures in
watch) Appendix II of this manual
Testing bridge equipment, daily at noon Hazard / Risk factors control measures in
Appendix II of this manual
Testing of equipment, pre-arrival, pre-departure port Danger of failure of a critical equipment during
X Corresponding Checklist from Bridge
(including main engine & steering gear) passage Procedure Manual
Hazard / Risk factors control measures in
Tug positioning, making fast/casting off Appendix II of this manual
SECTION 3
WALLEM Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD CRITICAL EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS Checked by : Director (Marine)
RISK ASSESSMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
CRITICAL OPERATIONS Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page - 10 -
Single point/buoy moorings Damage to vessel and environment if procedures x Company Risk assessment done which is in
not followed Appendix I of this manual
Underwater inspection / diving x Underwater inspection and /or work Checklist from
the Safety Manual
Working aloft x Working aloft checklist from Safety Manual
Crane greasing Personal injury to crew if error in procedures. x Company Risk assessment done which is in
Appendix I of this manual
Crane Wire - Greasing Personal injury to crew if error in procedures. x Company Risk assessment done which is in
Appendix I of this manual
Lifeboats – weekly movement Loss of lifeboat if controls not applied x Company Risk assessment done which is in
Appendix I of this manual
SECTION 3
WALLEM Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD CRITICAL EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS Checked by : Director (Marine)
RISK ASSESSMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
CRITICAL OPERATIONS Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page - 13 -
(!)
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION CRITICAL OPERATIONS DETAILS OF CONTROL MEASURE
Lifeboats – Lowering lifeboats every 3 months Loss of life or lifeboat if procedures are not x Company Risk assessment done which is in
followed Appendix I of this manual
Securing/un-securing cargo – break bulk Damage to vessel or the crew if the cargo were x Hazard / Risk factors control measures in Appendix II
to break loose of this manual
Cargo hold cleaning Personal injury to crew if error in procedures. x Company Risk assessment done which is in
Appendix I of this manual
Opening cargo hatches Personal injury to crew if error in procedures. x Company Risk assessment done which is in
Appendix I of this manual
Lightering to barges Damage to vessel and environment if procedures x Company Risk assessment done which is in
not followed and hazards mitigated Appendix I of this manual
(!) Deck & Cargo Procedures – Tankers (Oil, Chemical and Gas)
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION CRITICAL OPERATIONS DETAILS OF CONTROL MEASURE
Loading operations Damage to vessel and environment if procedures Company Risk assessment done which is in
not followed and hazards mitigated Appendix I of this manual
Discharging operations Damage to vessel and environment if procedures Company Risk assessment done which is in
not followed and hazards mitigated Appendix I of this manual
Gas freeing / Gassing up or Inerting Damage to vessel and injury to personnel if x Company Risk assessment done which is in
procedures not followed Appendix I of this manual
Hot-work in ballast tank Damage to vessel and danger of injury to crew if x Additional hot work permit for enclosed space of
procedures are not followed Safety Manual
Lining up cargo system Damage to equipment and environment if x Company Risk assessment done which is in
procedures not followed Appendix I of this manual
Topping up cargo tanks Damage to vessel and environment if procedures x Company Risk assessment done which is in
not followed and hazards mitigated Appendix I of this manual
Ship to Ship Lightering Damage to vessel and environment if procedures x Checklist 1 to 5 from Ship to ship transfer guide to be
not followed and hazards mitigated used for STS operations
SECTION 3
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD CRITICAL EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
RISK ASSESSMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
CRITICAL OPERATIONS Rev.No. / Date : June 2010
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 18 -
Ship to Ship Lightering Damage to vessel and environment if x Checklist 1 to 5 from Ship to ship transfer guide to
procedures not followed and hazards mitigated be used for STS operations
Ullaging/Sampling/Temperature of cargo Injury to crew in case of toxic gases x Company Risk assessment done which is in
Appendix I of this manual
Sampling of cargo Damage to vessel and environment if procedures x Company Risk assessment done which is in
not followed and hazards mitigated Appendix I of this manual
Oil change or maintenance on Cargo Compressor Personal injury if procedures are not followed x Company Risk assessment done which is in
Appendix I of this manual
Changing valve on cargo line / vapour line Danger to personnel and damage to environment x Company Risk assessment done which is in
if procedures not followed Appendix I of this manual
SECTION 3
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD CRITICAL EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
RISK ASSESSMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
CRITICAL OPERATIONS Rev.No. / Date : June 2010
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 19 -
Opening / closing of ramps Immediate Damage to vessel and personal x Company Risk assessment done which is
injury if hazards are not controlled in Appendix I of this manual
Greasing of ramp wires Immediate Damage to vessel and personal x Company Risk assessment done which is
injury if hazards are not controlled in Appendix I of this manual
Opening / closing of water tight sliding bulkhead Immediate Damage to vessel and personal x Company Risk assessment done which is
doors injury if hazards are not controlled in Appendix I of this manual
Opening / closing of movable ramps Immediate Damage to vessel and personal x Company Risk assessment done which is
injury if hazards are not controlled in Appendix I of this manual
Loading of Reefer cargo Immediate Damage to vessel and personal x Company Risk assessment done which
injury if hazards are not controlled is in Appendix I of this manual
Discharging of Reefer cargo Immediate Damage to vessel and personal x Company Risk assessment done which
injury if hazards are not controlled is in Appendix I of this manual
Carriage of reefer cargo Immediate Damage to vessel and personal x Company Risk assessment done which
injury if hazards are not controlled is in Appendix I of this manual
Spreader movement Immediate danger to personnel if hazards not x Company Risk assessment done which
controlled is in Appendix I of this manual
Cargo operation Immediate Damage to vessel and personal x Company Risk assessment done which
injury if hazards are not controlled is in Appendix I of this manual
Handling of reefer container Immediate damage to cargo if procedures not x Company Risk assessment done which
followed is in Appendix I of this manual
SECTION 3
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD CRITICAL EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
RISK ASSESSMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
CRITICAL OPERATIONS Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2011
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 22 -
Bunkering/Sampling & Control Damage to environment due to overflow of oil x Checklist in ship type specific operation manual
“Appendices”
Fuel/Lubricating oil transfer Damage to environment due to overflow of oil x Company Risk assessment done and in
Appendix I of this manual
Operation of main & auxiliary engines Damage to machinery x Company Risk assessment done and in
Appendix I of this manual
Injury to personnel
Operation of steam plant Damage to machinery x Company Risk assessment done and in
Appendix I of this manual
Injury to personnel
Operation of cargo oil pump turbines Damage to machinery x Company Risk assessment done and in
Appendix I of this manual
Injury to personnel
Operation of purifier plant, fuel purification /re- Damage to machinery x Company Risk assessment done and in
circulation Appendix I of this manual
Injury to personnel
Handling of waste oil and bilge water Damage to environment due to discharge of oil x Company Risk assessment done and in
overboard Appendix I of this manual
SECTION 3
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD CRITICAL EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
RISK ASSESSMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
CRITICAL OPERATIONS Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2011
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 23 -
Emergency procedures in case of fire Damage to vessel, port or other vessel x Company Risk assessment done and in
Appendix I of this manual
Injury to personnel
Emergency procedures in case of grounding Damage to vessel x Company Risk assessment done and in
Appendix I of this manual
Damage to environment
Injury to personnel
Damage to equipment
Procedures in heavy weather Damage to machinery x Company Risk assessment done and in
Appendix I of this manual
Injury to personnel
Procedures in extreme cold & icy waters Damage to vessel x Company Risk assessment done and in
Appendix I of this manual
Damage to equipment
Procedures in extreme heat Risk assessment and control measures in Appendix II
of this manual
Heavy oil/Diesel oil change over Risk assessment and control measures in Appendix II
of this manual
SECTION 3
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD CRITICAL EQUIPMENT & SYSTEMS Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
RISK ASSESSMENT 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
CRITICAL OPERATIONS Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2011
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 24 -
Opening High Pressure vessel / Pipeline Damage to machinery x Checklist from Safety Manual
Injury to personnel
Boiler entry Damage to machinery Risk assessment and control measures in Appendix II
of this manual
Injury to personnel
Testing and Maintenance of OWS Risk assessment and control measures in Appendix II
of this manual
Blowing through main engine prior departure Risk assessment and control measures in Appendix II
of this manual
Changing over from low sulphur to high sulphur fuel Damage to environment x Company Risk assessment done and in
and vice versa Appendix I of this manual
Damage to equipment
Boiler entry Damage to machinery Risk assessment and control measures in Appendix II
of this manual
Injury to personnel
Testing and Maintenance of OWS Risk assessment and control measures in Appendix II
of this manual
Blowing through main engine prior departure Risk assessment and control measures in Appendix II
of this manual
Changing over from low sulphur to high sulphur fuel Damage to environment x Company Risk assessment done and in
and vice versa Appendix I of this manual
Damage to equipment
4.1 General
2. Nautical Inspectors are appointed by various flag states including the Bahamas, Liberia, Norway,
Cyprus, Panama, and Singapore. Also private Exclusive Surveyors and Classification Societies
Services are also sometimes employed by the Flag State to conduct Annual Safety Inspections on
their behalf. As the name suggests these Inspections and the certificates issued thereof are valid
for 12 months. Masters in consultation with WALLEM is to arrange for these inspections at a
suitable port.
3. The maritime Regulations of the Flag State, which are to be carried on board are the terms of
reference for the Annual Safety Inspections and are to be consulted for preparation, arrangements,
requirements, conduct and follow up of these Annual Flag State safety inspections.
4. The preparations for these inspections should be an on going program on board, and as such the
vessel is to be maintained at all times within the regimes of the Flag State as well as International
regulations applicable to the vessel.
5. The Documentation and the certificates under the Masters Handing over reports, together with all
the relevant inventories of Charts & Publications and Medical Inventories along with Class survey
Listing are to scrupulously maintained up-to-date, for the purposes of this annual flag state
6. Inspection: Any change in the status or expirations of the statutory certificates within the next 3
months are to be brought to the attention of the vessel superintendent for arranging surveys , and
to have these restored in time for any forth coming Inspection from any authorities.
7. Deficiencies, Major Non Conformities, Non Compliance’s can result in vessel detention, and
consequent financial burden/ Liabilities to the Owner as well as the operator, and it is the Masters
responsibility to ensure that all Flag State requirements, including ISM Code requirements are
complied with at all times and such detentions and “process loss” are avoided.
8. Vessels are to ensure that corrective action is implemented for all NCN and observations raised
during External & Internal ISM & ISPS audits. Vessels are to have closed copies of the all NCN’s
and observations of all External & Internal ISM & ISPS audits on file. Please note that ISPS audit
NCN and observations to be kept in ISPS and should not be kept in ISM file.
9. Masters are to arrange for a Safety Inspection to be carried out at a suitable port, on or about the
due date.
10. The documents as stipulated in the Flag State regulations shall be vetted in time prior to the
Inspection itself, for its Validity, correctness and Compliance with the latest and current
requirements and WALLEM to be informed for implementing corrective action.( previous Forms or
previous inspection report will be a handy tool to compare while preparing the documents)
11. Inform WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD of all and any discrepancies prior to any Safety
Inspection, which cannot be rectified by Ships initiative.
1. Pay particular attention to the requirements regarding Officers’ Licences. Bring this to the attention
of the Office in advance, if licences are not in order.
2. Licences of Competency of each Officer serving on board are to be in the custody of the Master
and if required by the Flag State regulations, prominently displayed under glass. Photocopies of
Licences may be displayed.
4. Officers must hold License with necessary endorsement of the relevant Flag State under which the
vessel is registered. If officer is not holding the License of the flag state along with its endorsement,
this has to be applied for before departing homeport. Recruiting offices have all details on
application procedures for the various Flag Sates. The officers are to maintain proof of application
till CRA (certificate of Application is received. CRA to be obtained at the earliest and Vessel to
check with Personnel department regarding CRA. The CRA’s have validity of three months and the
Vessel must have the License prior expiry of the CRA.
5. Certified Copies of the Trading certificates are to be suitably framed and prominently displayed on
the Bridge or in the Ships office. This is a SOLAS Requirement.
The Bridge log book and the Official Log Book will require particular attention in respect of these
Annual Safety Inspections and the following information in these log books must be available for the
Inspector to Peruse.
The Official Log Book is to contain, inter alia, the following entries:
** On completion of the Inspection, Master to log the result of the Inspection. The Draft report of
deficiencies noted is to be circulated on board for corrective action. Should the inspection reveal
any deficiencies that require office assistance, the intended plan for rectification along with the
Masters suggestion (If any) to be copied to the office.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSPECTIONS & SURVEYS Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2010
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -4-
Port State Control is the method of checking successful enforcement of the provisions of
various International Conventions regarding Safety, Working Conditions and Pollution
Prevention on Merchant Ships. Under International Law the Shipowner has the prime
responsibility for ensuring compliance and the Master being foremost, the servant of the Owner
has the responsibility and the authority to ensure compliance. The statute of the conventions
(being a signatory to the convention) requires the State whose flag the ship is flying to enforce
compliance by the Shipowner. However ships are invariably away from homeports, the Flag
State may not be in a position to ensure compliance in a continuous way. This is where the Port
State Control or “PSC”, provides the back up necessary for monitoring the implementation of
the International as well as domestic regulations.
For the purposes of developing a standard means of conducting vessel inspections and
simplifying the conduct and time intervals for these inspections, Regional Development of PSC
have been adopted by some countries, clubbed in Geographical Groups. These regional
agreements are under a Memorandum of Agreement frequently referred to as MOU’s and
currently the Following MOU’s are in force.
Example of MOU’s are:
Paris MOU
Tokyo MOU
USA & Other Territories. (The PSC is exercised through US Coast Guard vessel Inspections)
WALLEM attributes due importance to these Inspections and requires the Masters of Vessels to
be guided accordingly and enforce continuous compliance on board. Masters are referred to
various Correspondence on this subject from the office, along with Pro forma Checklists used
by various PSC authorities and Guidelines on PSC Inspection issued by various Classifications
Societies. These will provide adequate guidance for carrying out the preparatory work in
connection with a PSC Inspection and no efforts are to be spared, in rendering each PSC
inspection a successful one.
Please note that any critical deficiency or a number of deficiencies would not only result
in detention to the vessel but the PSC inspector can also issue a note to the vessel to
undergo an additional ISM audit stating that there has been a breakdown in the vessels
safety management systems.
Based on any history of casualty involving the ship, its Flag, Owner, or its Classification Society
and in some cases the manning as well; your ship may be targeted for a PSC inspection.
Although the PSC inspections are said to be random base on the above criteria your vessel
invariably could be pre targeted and subject to very stringent control measures. With the advent
of the ISM Code and the STCW convention PSC inspectors are particularly checking for crew
familiarity with the ships they are on and its Safety equipment.
For example the Vessel may be asked to demonstrate Abandon Ship Procedures without the
involvement of senior staff or have junior officer take effective charge during a fire drill or in an
emergency situation. The familiarity of the crew and Junior officers with the shipboard
equipment and their knowledge of it may also come under scrutiny. Any non-compliance, which
could result in “Ship detention”, is a process loss, which we are definitely committed to avoid.
You are required to keep the vessel under your command in full compliance of the Regulations
at all times.
Refer to SMS DVD for various PSC Checklists, which are to be used to prepare the vessel.
The deficiencies from the PSC inspection is to sent in the Infopath form to the office for
uploading into the Chemserve 3D database. The Infopath report should have all the
deficiencies, corrective action and preventive action. The superintendent will check the
Information in the Chemserve 3D database and close the report.
WALLEM Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSPECTIONS & SURVEYS Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -5-
(!) Vessels have been provided with the following tools to prepare for the PSC inspections:
1. The SMS DVD contains a section on PSC. This section contains the checklists from
various Class societies
2. On request, the common findings for the next port can be obtained from the MoU
database and sent to the vessel
3. PSC digest is published every month which contains details of the PSC performance of
individual ships in the previous month. The PSC digest also contains information with
respect to recent trends in PSC inspections and analysis of data from the various MoU.
Copies of previous PSC digests are available in the SMS DVD
Vessel should be thoroughly prepared for various Annual surveys Like SAFECON, IOPP, Safety
Radio, Safety Equipment, IAPP, Class surveys, etc. Vessel is to be prepared in consultation
with the superintendent prior to the surveyor attending the ship for the survey.
General
The Following items along with its sub items, with the necessary documentation and valid Certificates are
to be prepared for the Safety Equipment Survey. The Record of Safety Equipment, (Associated with
Safety Equipment Certificate) should be checked and the requirements in DE-28 & SMMS / PMS
complied with, and the Safety Equipment verified to be in the correct quantity and status, prior and well in
advance of the survey. All shortcomings, defects, deficiencies must be noted well in advance and
necessary corrective action planned in consultation with the vessel Superintendent and implemented in
time
1. Certificates
2. Lifeboats
3. Lifejackets, Immersion suits & TPA’s
4. Navigation Lights And Shapes, And Sound Signalling Apparatus
5. Pilot Ladders
6. Fire Fighting Equipment
7. Breathing Apparatus And Emergency Stations Equipment
8. Fire Alarms, Fire doors and Fire detection system
9. Emergency Stops/Switches & Quick Closing Valves
10. Pyrotechnics & LTA
11. Compasses
12. Lifeboat on-load release gear (thorough examination and operational
test to be carried out during the annual surveys by properly trained
personnel familiar with the system)
On completion of the Inspection Master to Advise WALLEM of the results of the Safety Equipment
Survey, and the Draft report is to be copied to the Office for follow up if required. Should the inspection
reveal any deficiencies the intended plan for rectification along with the Masters suggestion (If any) to
be copied to the office. Safety Equipment has Highest Priority and deficiencies on account of Safety
Equipment are to be immediately attended to and vessel restored to a state without any defects to
Safety Equipment.
Please note that any critical deficiency or a number of safety deficiencies would result in the
Class Headquarters recommending an additional ISM audit stating that there has been a
breakdown in the vessels safety management systems. Hence, good preparation is very
essential for Safety Equipment Survey.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSPECTIONS & SURVEYS Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2010
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -7-
Vessels are to advice office once the window for the Intermediate and Renewal Audits are open For
Intermediate survey; this is after the second anniversary of the initial audit. The Renewal audit can only be
done within 3 months of the expiry of the certificate
1 General
2 Masters and Chief Engineers are to ensure that all certificates pertaining to the ship are, at all times,
valid.
5 The availability of the Surveyor is to be taken into consideration, bearing in mind that, in smaller
ports, he may have to travel considerable distances, substantially adding to costs.
6 WALLEM will arrange for surveyor based on vessels Port schedule. Vessels should keep the Local
Agents advised of Vessels ETA so that they can keep the surveyor updated with vessels schedule to
enable his attendance.
7 Workshop Assistance
9 Workshop charges vary considerably, even within the same port, and, where possible, quotes are to
be obtained.
10 Records
11 The certificates section of PMS is to be kept updated and updated. The updated information would
be available as the data would be a part of the export file which is sent every 15 days to the office.
12 The class survey listing is sent regularly to the vessel as attachment by the technical department.
Vessels to check the class survey listing when they are received as a cross checking measure to
ensure that all is in order.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSPECTIONS & SURVEYS Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -8-
General
Chief Engineers can carry out surveys of various machinery items as detailed below:
1. Auxiliary Engines and fittings to be surveyed by the Chief Engineer. De Carb of unit to be done
and calibration Reports to be prepared. Also, Vessel to maintain records of parts renewed, Log
entry on the survey and Photographs of the parts and work done. Surveyor will then carry out
running test, load sharing check and check on all safety trips prior crediting the item.
2. L.O. Pumps ad F.W. Pumps can be surveyed by the Chief Engineer. Log entry of the overhaul
with photographs are to be maintained. Surveyor will carry out a running test on next visit and
then credit the item.
3. Main Engine Piston, Liner and Cylinder Head to be surveyed by the Chief Engineer. The vessel to
prepare calibration report, Take photographs of the overhaul and suitable log entries are to be
made. Surveyor will carry out a running test on next visit and then credit the item.
In All the above cases, Proper Entries to be made in the Vessels SMS System
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSPECTIONS & SURVEYS Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -9-
Chief Engineers can carry out Surveys of L.O Pumps, Fresh Water Pumps, Auxiliary Engines and Main
Engines (certain sections).
Class in certain conditions may accept survey of Sea Water Pumps and cargo pumps by chief Engineer.
Important: Main Engine Bearings and Pressure vessels can only be done by class surveyor and
are survey of the two mentioned items are not to be done by Chief Engineer.
a) The engine is to be completely opened up and a careful examination made of the following:
b) Cylinders.
c) Liners.
d) Covers.
e) Valves.
f) Valve gear.
g) Pistons.
h) Piston rings.
i) Top and bottom and bearings.
j) Gudgeon pins.
k) Crankcase door fastenings.
l) Explosion relief devices.
m) The top halves of all main bearings are to be removed and one or two bottom halves turned out for
inspection. If these are found in order, the remaining bottom halves need not be removed.
n) A very careful examination is to be made of all crank pins and journals for cracks, especially at the
fillets and in the vicinity of oil holes.
o) The crank web deflections are to be measured and recorded. N.B. It must be verified that the journals
are resting on the main bearings when the readings are taken.
p) The cylinder liners are to be gauged and the wear recorded.
q) The lubricating oil cooler is to be opened, examined and tested. Any direct driven lubricating oil
pump, cooling pumps, air compressors, etc. are to be opened up and examined.
r) It is to be verified that all safety devices are in working order.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSPECTIONS & SURVEYS Rev.No. / Date : Sept. 2009
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 10 -
1) In the case of "stand-by" units, such as main lubricating oil pumps, it is the responsibility of the Chief
Engineer, in consultation with the Master, only to open these up under favourable conditions, so that
no hazard to the ship or cargo would result from the overhaul that is in progress.
2) In the case of an auxiliary engine, surveys may be carried out provided that the number of generator
sets is such that all services essential to the propulsion and safety of the ship, and the preservation of
refrigerated cargo, can be supplied when any two sets are not working.
3) One of these two "non-working" sets can then be overhauled whilst the other remains on "stand-by".
4) Any item, which constitutes a Condition of Class, is excluded from survey by Chief Engineers.
5) After a survey by the Chief Engineer, a Classification Society Surveyor would check the vessels
records during his next scheduled visit (within 2- 3 months) for crediting the items. Given below are
the checks that would be carried out by the class surveyor:
1) The relevant entry in the Logbook as well as entries in the PMS is to be shown to the Surveyor.
2) Two copies of the Survey Report, in English, and signed by the Chief Engineer, describing the item
surveyed, the condition as found and any repairs effected, are to be given to the Surveyor.
3) Parts, which have been removed and replaced by spares, are to be shown to the Surveyor.
4) Items such as auxiliary engines and independently driven pumps and compressors, are to be
presented under working conditions to be Surveyor.
5) If the Surveyor is dissatisfied with any item that is being surveyed, he has the right to require any such
item to be opened up for his examination.
6) The Surveyor will issue an Interim Certificate or a Survey Report for these items and forward his
report to the Classification Society, attaching to it a copy of the Chief Engineer's report.
In case of Vessels with Ships PMS system that is approved by Class, all the survey items done by chief
engineer would be checked and credited by class during the Annual surveys.
General
Some Flag states require PSC deficiencies to be reported to them. All Port State control deficiencies
must be immediately reported by the ship to the office. All Port State Detentions will be immediately
reported to the Flag state of the Vessel by the Superintendent.
Liberia
Liberian requires that port state detentions to be immediately reported to the Administration. The Port
State detention would be reported immediately by the superintendent to the following address:
safety@liscr.com (As per Circular ISM 001 – 5.10.4 )
Panama
All PSC inspections reports must be immediately reported to the Port State Control
Section of Panama ( E-Mail : psc@amp.gob.pa ) by the office. The actions taken to
correct the deficiencies found during PSC inspections must be sent, duly documented, as
soon as possible to the PSC section.
The correction of deficiencies shall be sent by the using the format in appendix I of this
Merchant Marine Circular: “Correction of Deficiencies Reports” Form (F-JERP-02-01).
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 4 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSPECTIONS & SURVEYS Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2012
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 11 -
Bahamas
In order to assist the BMA in identifying those vessels which may be at increased risk of
detention, the Company is required to send copies of every PSC inspection report (Form
A and, if deficiencies are identified, Form B) to the BMA as soon as possible after the
inspection. The superintendent of the vessel would send form A and Form B to
tech@bahamasmaritime.com.
The BMA will examine the PSC reports to determine if any further action is appropriate.
This may include an additional ISM audit or BMA inspection. The BMA will contact the
Company if any further action is deemed appropriate.
WALLEM SECTION 5 Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
BUNKERS AND LUBRICATING OILS Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2014
MANUAL – PART II Page -1- Approved by : Managing Director
5.1 BUNKERS
The guidelines for Bunkering procedure and the Bunkering checklists are contained in Ship Type Specific
Manual (Appendices), these to be referred to for any procedure which involves the transfer of fuel oil,
diesel oil or lubricating oil to and from ship or from one tank to another and not considered as cargo.
5.2.1. General
5.2.1.1 Lubricating oil samples are to be landed for analysis at the intervals specified below.
5.2.1.2 Samples are to be landed for analysis at the first available opportunity in the event of any
suspected contamination by:
5.2.1.3 If any contamination is suspected, reasons for such suspicion and investigations carried out
are to be forwarded to WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.
5.2.3.1 During routine de-carbonising the lub-oil may be renewed provided it has been in use for a
considerable length of time.
5.2.4.1 In dry-dock, if the system has been drained for any reason, the lub-oil is to be re-filled prior to
the flooding of the dock.
5.2.5.1.1 CONS. LTR./HR at OBS. RPM. x SG. at ER. TEMP x RPM. at CONT. SERV. x 103
WALLEM SECTION 5 Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
BUNKERS AND LUBRICATING OILS Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2014
MANUAL – PART II Page -2- Approved by : Managing Director
Planned Receiving Vol. Tank Volume Actual Remaining Actual Loading Actual remaining
Order No. Tank No. M3 % Sounding M3 Sounding M3 Sounding M3 Sounding M3 Temp°C Sp. Gr. M3 Remarks
WALLEM SECTION 6 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT SECURITY ON SHIPS Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -1-
6.1 GENERAL
Please refer to Ship Security Plan for details. Please follow Procedures and instructions in
Ship Security Plan.
All ships are supplied a copy of book titled “Pirates and armed robbers - A Master’s guide”
Published by the International Shipping Federation.
Under all circumstances sufficient officers and crew must be retained on board to ensure the
security of the vessel and to form a full emergency party.
Once monies are paid to crew it is recommended that Master does not store crew’s monies in
ship’s safe - once paid out it is individual’s responsibility. Suffice to state that in these days of Tele-
banking, crew should be encouraged to keep minimum cash in person by making regular allotments
to their bankers.
In certain countries, persons posing as very polite local officials, suppliers and the like wait for the
Master to leave his cabin or office where ship’s safe is located. They are master safe breakers and
are able to steal contents very quickly. Do not let such situations arise.
6.4 PIRACY
Please refer to Procedures and instructions in the Ship Security Plan (SSP). Please refer to
latest version of the BMP ( Best Management Practice) for Piracy and related publications.
6.4.1 GoA and East Coast Somalia
There should be a separate file on Piracy in Gulf of Aden ( GoA ) / Somalia on each vessel. The file
should contain the various advisories and other information sent from the office.
Fleet Cell will send an E-Mail with the Standard security equipments like razor wires, torches, night
vision binoculars which must be on board the vessel for transit in the GoA and in the Indian Ocean
area. The list of standard security equipment is would be updated as required based on industry
feedback and advisories.
Vessels are reminded that the razor wire should be rigged in concentric circles to provide an
effective barrier. The barbed wire needs to be replenished over time as some sections may no
longer usable after a few deployments. Hence, it is important for vessels to check the condition of
the various security equipment prior to the transit in the GoA / Indian Ocean region to ensure that
the required equipment’s are in good condition and would provide a good deterrent when
deployed.The razor wires of applicable sections must be removed before port entry.
WALLEM SECTION 6 Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT SECURITY ON SHIPS Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2013
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -2-
A. Master are to protest to the Agents and the Stevedoring Company concerned, and, if necessary, to
the Police, as soon as pilferage or theft from cargo is discovered.
B. Masters are to make a report showing the security measures have been taken.
C. The persons involved are to be identified, and the affected consignment specified.
E. Masters are always at liberty to contact the local P & I representative for assistance if the situation
requires.
If a general-cargo ship is time-chartered, the Master is to place to Time Charterers on notice, stating
that, whilst the ship will do everything possible to prevent pilferage, the action that they Will be able to
take will be limited. The Time Charterers should, therefore, arrange that the Stevedores are closely
supervised. The Owners/Operators of the ship will NOT be responsible for any loss of cargo as a
result of Stevedore misbehaviour.
Wallem is a signatory to the Sea carrier Initiative with the CBP of the United States. The sea carrier
security manual is attached to this manual and ship staff are requested to be familiar its contents.
Wallem also participates in the MOU between BIMCO and Customs of most European countries
(U.K, Sweden, Finland, Netherlands, Cyprus, Greece Etc. The MOU between BIMCO and
Netherlands Customs is also attached to this manual for reference.
The use, numbering and distribution of keys must be controlled by Master. The Ship Security Plan
should provide for corrective action in the event of any key being lost.
Master key to be with Master & Chief Engineer.
General Key locker should remain locked & controlled by Chief Officer who must endeavour to
maintain strict key locker control.
All personnel should comply with local customs regulations for the ports being visited. The list of
contraband items for the country can be obtained from the agents.
It is unlawful for seafarers to possess, conceal or deal in any contraband item while the vessel is in
port of that country.
.
SEA CARRIER SECURITY
MANUAL
This SEA CARRIER SECURITY MANAUL of 42 pages inclusive of the cover page and issued
by THE DEPARTMENT OF TRESURY STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE is deemed to be part of
Wallem Shipmanagement SBM Part II and is duly approved and authorised by the Managing
Director for use with and inclusion in this manual
SECTION 7 STOWAWAYS
1. General
With Access control and security procedures in place as per the Ship Security Plan (SSP)< any
stowaway on board would be a security Incident. A Report of a Security incident would need to
be filled and sent to Flag State and / or Port with copy to CSO and CSM.
Any Stowaway on board would indicate a breach of the ships security Plan and its security
Procedures. The Procedures and Guidelines in the SSP to be diligently followed which would
automatically avoid any stowaway being able to obtain access to the vessel.
Stowaways are an ongoing problem. They are dangerous in so far as they can be carrying drugs and
also disrupt the normal life of the ship.
1.1. All possible efforts must be made to prevent stowaways boarding.
1.2. Proper security arrangements in port will assist. All spaces that can be, should be secured. Entrances
to the accommodation should be locked or sealed except for one, which can be watched. Locking
arrangements should be such that crew should be able to exit through the door in an emergency and the
fire party should also be able to enter the space in case of fire.
1.3. Before sailing as thorough a search as is possible should be carried out and details of the search
entered in the official logbook.
1.4. Do not depart Port Limits /pilot boarding area until stowaway search has been completed.
This assists in disembarking stowaways as vessel is still in the territorial waters of the country
where stowaway embarked.
1.5. Any stowaways found are to be handed over to the port authorities.
Many stowaways give themselves up once a vessel is at sea, often by making a loud noise. For a vessel
discovering stowaways, the priority is for them to be disembarked at the next port of call. The Master
should therefore immediately inform WALLEM, who will in turn advise the vessels P&I Club so that
international formalities can be completed as soon as possible.
He should also take the following steps immediately if possible:-
- Search the area where the stowaway was found for concealed documents, etc.,
- Search the stowaways clothing
- Interview the stowaway and immediately advise WALLEM and agents at the next port of call of
the following
a) Port of embarkation
b) Details of documents held
c) Name
d) Date and place of birth
e) Address
f) Nationality
WALLEM
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD
SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
STOWAWAYS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -2-
- The stowaway should be kept secure all the times, particularly when the vessel is in port.
- While the stowaway is on board, the Master should not provide work for him and the stowaway
should not be signed on to the ships Articles.
- P&I club should be advised immediately of the above, together with
a) Full itinerary
b) Details of agents at subsequent ports.
c) Details of the ship’s radio/fax/telex/e-mail etc.
- P&I Clubs will agree on a course of action with WALLEM and instruct local correspondents
where necessary.
Masters should always bear in mind that stowaways frequently give false details in order to delay their removal
from the ship. If the Master believes that the stowaway is not telling the truth he should so report.
2. If a stowaway is found after sailing but before sailing port limits he is to be handed to the port authorities.
2.1. If a stowaway is found shortly after clearing port limits contact with the authorities should be made to see
if he could be landed. This is preferable if the delay is minimal. If you are in doubt we or Owners can be
contacted.
2.2. Otherwise it is important to note that the first priority in a case where a stowaway is discovered is to
establish his identity without this repatriation can be a costly and time consuming process. To this end
the stowaway must be questioned at length as soon as possible, and as much of the following
information recorded in the Official Log Book as possible: -
i. Family name.
ii. Given names.
iii. Age and date of birth.
iv. Nationality.
v. Place and country of birth.
vi. Place of immediate residence.
vii. Existence and location of any identity documents.
viii. Places of residence in last five years.
ix. Occupations carried out during last five years with location, employer and dates.
x. Name of father and place of residence.
xi. Name of mother and place of residence.
xii. Names of bothers and sisters and their places of residence.
xiii. Names of any other relatives, friends and places of residence.
xiv. Names of any deceased relatives or friends with dates of demise and places of burial with
appropriate dates.
xv. Names of any recently born relatives, or children of friends with appropriate dates.
xvi. Note of any manufacturer's clothing tags on apparel and examine all personal effects for
possible further reference.
xvii. Compile full description of stowaway, i.e. height, weight, build, complexion, colour of hair, eyes
and skin, distinguishing marks.
xviii. Try and establish military service and/or police record.
WALLEM
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD
SECTION 7 Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
STOWAWAYS 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -3-
xxi. Any other information which may assist in establishing existence within a given location, which
can possible be used to eventually substantiate identity.
A message must be sent to us also giving this information unless, of course, you will be landing him
within hours of discovery thus making this message unnecessary. Similar and further advice is available
in P & I Clubs Hand Book & “Collecting Evidence” booklet.
If you have doubt about the truth of the answers given further questions should be asked to check.
3.1. Accommodation is to be basic and to be kept locked at all times the stowaway is inside. Portholes if any
should be sealed.
3.2. Meals are to be nutritious but plain, enough to keep the stowaway healthy but no more.
3.6. The stowaway should not be made to work even if this is volunteered.
3.7. The reason for this is so that on his return home he will not recommend your vessel to his friends as a
good one to travel on.
4. Full co-operation must be given to P & I Club representatives and your agents so that any stowaway can
be legally landed as soon as possible.
4.1. All efforts are to be made to prevent a stowaway illegally disembarking whilst a vessel is in port.
12/1998
3. The guidelines also list out the responsibilities of the master and the
shipowner or the operator if the stowaways are found on board a ship after
leaving a port.
Marine Department
Multi-lateral Policy Division
17 March 1998
RESOLUTION A.871(20)
adopted on 27 November 1997
GUIDELINES ON THE ALLOCATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES TO SEEK THE
SUCCESSFUL RESOLUTION OF STOWAWAY CASES
THE ASSEMBLY,
NOTING with concern the number of incidents involving stowaways, the consequent potential for
disruption of maritime traffic, the impact such incidents may have on the safe operation of ships and the
considerable risks faced by stowaways, including loss of life,
RECALLING that the International Convention Relating to Stowaways, 1957, which attempted to
establish an internationally acceptable regime for dealing with stowaways, has not yet come into force,
AGREEING that, for the purposes of this resolution, a stowaway is defined as a person who is
secreted on a ship or in cargo which is subsequently loaded on the ship, without the consent of the shipowner
or the master or any other responsible person, and who is detected on board after the ship has departed from
a port and reported as a stowaway by the master to the appropriate authorities,
TAKING INTO ACCOUNT that some stowaways may be asylum-seekers and refugees, which
should entitle them to such relevant procedures as those provided by international instruments and national
legislation,
BEING AWARE that, in the absence of an internationally agreed procedure for dealing with
stowaways, considerable difficulties are being encountered by shipmasters and shipping companies,
shipowners and ship operators in disembarking stowaways from ships into the care of the appropriate
authorities,
AGREEING that the existence of such guidance should in no way be regarded as condoning or
encouraging the practice of stowing away and other illegal migration, and should not undermine efforts to
combat the separate problems of alien smuggling or human trafficking.
-2- A 20/Res.871
BELIEVING that, at present, stowaway cases can best be resolved through close co-operation
among all authorities and persons concerned,
RECOGNIZMG that stowaway incidents should be dealt with humanely by all Parties involved,
giving due consideration to the operational safety of the ship and its crew,
WHILST URGING national authorities, port authorities, shipowners and masters to take all
reasonable precautions to prevent stowaways gaming access to vessels,
HAVING CONSIDERED the recommendations made by the Facilitation Committee at its twenty-
fifth session,
1. ADOPTS the Guidelines on the allocation of responsibilities to seek the successful resolution of
stowaway cases, set out in the Annex to the present resolution;
2. URGES Governments to implement in their national policies and practices the procedures
recommended in the annexed Guidelines;
3. URGES ALSO Governments to deal with stowaway cases in a spirit of co-operation with other
parties concerned, on the basis of the allocation of responsibilities set out in the annexed Guidelines;
4. INVITES shipping companies, shipowners and ship operators to take on the relevant responsibilities
set out in the annexed Guidelines and to guide their masters and crews as to their respective
responsibilities in stowaway cases;
6. REQUESTS the Facilitation Committee to continue to monitor the effectiveness of the annexed
Guidelines on the basis of information provided by Governments and the industry, to keep them
under review and to take such further action, including the development of a relevant binding
instrument, as may be considered necessary in the light of developments;
7. REVOKES FAL.2/Circ.43
-3- A 20/Res.871
ANNEX
1 Masters, shipowners’, port authorities, national administrations, and other bodies including security
operators all have a responsibility to cooperate to prevent illegal access to a vessel while it is in port
However, no matter how effective routine port and ship security is, there will still be occasions
when stowaways gain. access to vessels, either secreted in the cargo or by surreptitious boarding.
2 For the purposes of the Guidelines a stowaway is defined as a person who is secreted on a ship, or in
cargo which is subsequently loaded on the ship, without the consent of the shipowner or the master
or any other responsible person, and who is detected on board after the ship has departed from a port
and reported as a stowaway by the master to the appropriate authorities.
3 The resolution of stowaway cases is difficult because of different national legislation in each of the
potentially several countries involved: the country of embarkation, the country of disembarkation,
the flag State of the vessel, the country of apparent, claimed or actual nationality/citizenship of the
stowaway, and countries of transit during repatriation.
4 There are, however, some basic principles which can be applied generally. These are as follows:
.3 The shipowner and his representative on the spot, the master, as well as port authorities and
national administrations, should cooperate as far as possible in dealing with stowaway
cases.
.4 Shipowners and their representatives on the spot, masters, port authorities and national
administrations should have security arrangements in place which, as far as practicable,
will prevent intending stowaways from getting aboard a ship or, if this fails, will detect
them before a ship arrives at port. Where national legislation permits, national authorities
should consider prosecution of stowaways for trespassing upon or damaging the property of
the shipping company, or the cargo.
.5 All Parties should be aware that an adequate search may minimize the risk of having to deal
with a stowaway case and may also save the life of a stowaway who may, for example, be
hiding in a place which is subsequently sealed and/or chemically treated.
____________________
‘Including any persons or party acting on behalf of the owner of the vessel
“Reference is made to the provisions of the United Nations Convention relating to the Status of
Refugees of 28 July 1951 and of the United Nations Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees of
31 January 1967.
-4- A 20/Res. 871
.6 Countries should admit returned stowaways with full nationality/citizenship status of that
country or a right of residence.
.7 The country of the original port of embarkation of a stowaway should normally accept the
return of such a stowaway for examination pending final case disposition.
.8 Every effort should be made to avoid situations where a stowaway has to be detained on
board a ship indefinitely. In this regard countries should co-operate with the shipowner in
arranging the return of a stowaway to an appropriate country
.9 Stowaway incidents should be dealt with humanely by all parties involved. Due
consideration must always be given to the operational safety of the ship and to the well-
being of the stowaway.
5 As a first step in addressing the issue, a framework of the various responsibilities, rights and
liabilities of the parties involved needs to be identified and agreed. The following allocation of
responsibility is suggested:
.l The master
.l.l to make every effort to determine immediately the port of embarkation of the stowaway;
.I.2 to make every effort to establish the identity, including the nationality/citizenship of the
stowaway;
.1.3 to prepare a statement containing all information relevant to the stowaway, in accordance
with information specified in the standard document annexed to these Guidelines, for
presentation to the appropriate authorities;
.1.4 to notify the existence of a stowaway and any relevant details to his shipowner and
appropriate authorities at the port of embarkation, the next port of call and the flag
.1.5 not to depart from his planned voyage to seek the disembarkation of a stowaway to any
country unless repatriation has been arranged with sufficient documentation and permission
given for disembarkation, or unless there are extenuating security or compassionate
reasons;
.1.6 to ensure that the stowaway is presented to the appropriate authorities at the next port of
call in accordance with their requirements;
.1.7 to take appropriate measures to ensure the security, general health, welfare and safety of the
stowaway until disembarkation;
.2.1 to ensure that the existence of, and any relevant information on, the stowaway has been
notified to the appropriate authorities at the port of embarkation, the next port of call and
the flag State;
-5- A 20/Res.871
.2.2 to comply with any removal directions made by the competent national authorities at the
port of disembarkation;
.3 Country of first scheduled port of call after discovery of the stowaway (port of
disembarkation)
.3.1 to accept the stowaway for examination in accordance with the national laws of that
country and, where the competent national authority considers that it would facilitate
matters, to allow the shipowner and his named representative and the competent or
appointed P&I Club correspondent to have access to the stowaway;
.3.2 to consider allowing disembarkation and provide, as necessary and in accordance with
national law, secure accommodation which may be at the expense of the shipowner or
agents, where:
.3.2.2 national authorities are satisfied that arrangements have been made and will be effected for
the early return or repatriation of the stowaway by other means (which may be at the
expense of the shipowner or agents), or
.3.2.3 a stowaway’s presence on board would endanger the safe operation of the vessel;
.3.3 to assist, as necessary, in the identification of the stowaway and the establishment of his or
her nationality/citizenship;
.3.5 to give directions for the removal of the stowaway to the port of embarkation, country of
nationality/citizenship or to some other country to which lawful directions may be made, in
co-operation with the shipowner and his nominated representative;
.3.6 in co-operation with the shipowner and his and his nominated representatives to discuss
repatriation or removal arrangements or directions with the master/shipowner or their
appointed representatives, keeping them informed, as far as practicable, of the level of
detention costs, while keeping these to a minimum;
.3.7 to consider mitigation of charges that might otherwise be applicable when shipowners have
cooperated with the control authorities to the satisfaction of those authorities in measures
designed to prevent the transportation of stowaways;
.3.8 to issue, if necessary, in the event that the stowaway has no identification and/or travel
documents, a document attesting to the circumstances of embarkation and arrival to enable
the return of the stowaway either to his country of origin, to the country of the port of
embarkation, or to any other country to which lawful directions can be made, by any means
of transport;
-6- A 20/Res. 871
.3.9 to band over the document to the transport operator effecting the removal of the stowaway;
.3.10 to take proper account of the interests of, and implications for, the shipowner or agent
when directing detention and setting removal directions, so far as is consistent with the
maintenance of control, their duties or obligations to the stowaway under the law, and tire
cost to public funds.
.4 The country of the original port of embarkation of the stowaway (i.e. the country
where the stowaway first boarded the ship)
.4.2 to accept, in normal circumstances, a stowaway back for examination where tire port of
embarkation is identified to the satisfaction of the authorities of the receiving country;
.4.3 to apprehend and detain the stowaway, where permitted by national legislation, if the
stowaway is discovered before sailing either on the vessel or in cargo due to be loaded; to
refer the intended stowaway to local authorities for prosecution, and/or, where applicable,
to the immigration authorities for examination and possible removal: no charge to he
imposed on the shipowner in respect of detention or removal costs, and no penalty to be
imposed;
.4.4 to apprehend and detain the stowaway, where permitted by national legislation, if the
stowaway is discovered while the vessel is still in the territorial waters of the country of the
port of his embarkation, or in another port in the same country (not having called at a port
in another country in the meantime) no charge to be imposed on the shipowner in respect
of detention or removal costs, and no penalty to be imposed.
.5.1 to make every effort to assist in determining the identity and nationality/citizenship of the
stowaway and to document tire stowaway, accordingly once satisfied that he or she holds
the nationality/citizenship claimed;
.6.2 to be prepared to make representations to the relevant authority to assist in the removal of
the stowaway from the vessel at the first available opportunity;
.6.3 to he prepared to assist the master/shipowner or the authority at the port of disembarkation
in making arrangements for the removal or repatriation of the stowaway.
-7- A 20/Res.871
to allow, subject to normal visa requirements, the transit through their ports and airports of
stowaways travelling under the removal instructions or directions of the country of the
port of disembarkation.
-8- A 20/Res.871
APPENDIX
STOWAWAY DETAILS
SHIP DETAILS
Name of Ship:
IMO Number:
Flag:
Company:
Company address:
Agent in next port;
Agent address:
IRCS:
Inmarsat Number: Photograph of stowaway
Port of registry:
Name of master:
STOWAWAY DETAILS
OTHER DETAILS
Method of boarding, including other persons involved (e.g. crew, port workers, etc.), and whether they
were secreted in cargo/container or hidden in the vessel:
Was the stowaway assisted in boarding the vessel, or assisted by any member of the crew? If so, was any
payment made for this assistance?
Other information (e.g. names and addresses of colleagues, community leader, e.g. mayor, tribal chief,
contacts in other parts of the world):
Statement made by master (including any observations on the credibility of the information provided by
the stowaway):
Date(s) of interview(s):
Date: Date:
______________
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date : August 2006
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -1-
All vessels are provided with current issue of the following insurance related documents.
General Insurance Data (Ship Specific)
Master to refer to the data sheet to verify applicable covers and their deductibles
REPORTING PROCEDURE GUIDELINES FOR DEVIATION, CREW CLAIM, FIXED & FLOATING
OBJECTS, INSTITUTE WARRANTIES & WAR RISK TRADING
Deviations
It is obligatory for WALLEM to inform vessel’s P& I Club should a laden vessel deviate en-route to
destination, other than the Port given in the B/L. For Tankers, this requirement is imperative. If vessel
deviates whilst laden to receive bunkers, urgent spares, Crew change or similar activity; WALLEM will
inform the P& I Club of the deviation and reason for the same.
The P& I Club will require the type and quantity of cargo. In due course they will confirm that
the cover is held for subject deviation with additional premium if any as applicable.
Institute Warranties
Please refer to in SMS Documentation DVD, WSM – GENERAL LETTERS “INSURANCE SECTION”.
A copy of the IWL chart should be posted in the Chart room for easy reference .
Depending on hull conditions, vessel is warranted not to trade to or through certain areas, e.g. West
of Baie Comeau / Matane (But not West of Montreal) between 1st December and 30th April.
Should vessel have to trade to these areas or breach “IWL”, H+M Underwriters are to be advised
before the vessel breaches the IWL. They may charge an additional premium which owners would
preferably pass on to Charterers. Date and time vessel breaches IWL and is expected to enter back
into Institute warranties are to be informed to WALLEM Safety and Insurance Department
The ETA/ETD of crossing into /out of the IWL (especially for Bering Sea and Baltic region) must be
informed to WALLEM 96 hrs in advance. The updated actual times and positions of the crossing should
again be informed to WALLEM at the time of crossing. This is important so as to ensure that the ship is
held covered when breaking warranty limits.
Lloyd’s of London - Should situation occur. Fleet Personnel will give the necessary notification to
Master.
General Instructions
The main points to remember regarding any inquiries into serious incidents are: -
A. Establish identity and interest of all parties or individuals present during any discussions
relative any incident.
B. Unless guidance is being given by legal counsel or P & I representative, only facts relative to
time and location are to be given to interested parties from Owners’ side, and none at all to
the third party representatives.
C. Contact the Hong Kong Office or an Area Office as soon as possible. Outside office hours
you may telephone any Superintendent or Manager, whose home telephone numbers are
given in “MCCM Manual” & “SMS Documentation DVD.
D. Under no circumstances should you introduce opinions, conclusions and/or statements
contrary to Owners’ interests into any documents or record pertaining to an incident, i.e.
All correspondence, e-mail, faxes and telexes are to be titled ‘FOR ATTENTION OF OWNER’S
SOLICITORS ONLY’ and sent to WALLEM SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD.
Reports
c) Opinion regarding standards of personnel and/or equipment must be sent under separate
cover in the normal manner, and are NOT to be included in reports under.
Guidance Notes
PART I
The purpose of these notes is to clarify for Masters what is required of them in circumstances that may
give rise to:-
It should be understood that a Hull & Machinery Insurance Policy is precisely what its name indicates;
a policy which insures a vessel’s Hull & Machinery against damage occasioned by specified perils.
Hull and Machinery (H & M) Underwriters are not, generally speaking, concerned with damage to or
short delivery of cargo, they are not concerned with crew matters (except indirectly where there has
been a loss of life resulting from a collision) and they are not concerned with third party liabilities
excepting where the vessel insured by them is partly or totally to blame for a collision; in short, unless
there is physical damage to the insured vessel there is unlikely to be a claim on the H & M
Underwriters.
It is a standard procedure for Underwriters to insist that all H & M policies should contain an Excess or
“Deductible” which means that the Assured (The Shipowner or his Agent) will only be able to recover
costs in excess of this figure where the damage has been caused by a peril insured against. The
deductible applies to ‘each separate accident or occurrence’. It varies from vessel to vessel and is
usually fixed after assessing such things as the vessel’s age, her insured value and the Owners’
previous claims record.
Although Shipowners have a wide choice of Clauses with which they can cover their vessels,
generally speaking, it is best for a Master to assume that his vessel has a full cover whereby any
repair costs (apart from those relating to wear and tear or routine maintenance/class requirements) in
excess of the deductible will be recoverable. If the insurance cover is limited and as a result a specific
damage will not result in a claim, the Management office will know and the Master can be informed
accordingly.
Whenever a vessel is involved in an incident whereby a claim on H & M Underwriters is likely to arise,
the Master should immediately give details of same to the Management office since they in turn are
obliged to give immediate advice to their Underwriters. A full written report will be required from the
Master as soon as practicable and where the incident involves the vessel’s machinery, the Chief
Engineer’s detailed written report will also be required. There are two main accident situations where
the Master is also required to give immediate notice to third parties, these are:-
(a) When the vessel sustains damage caused by stevedores. and
(b) When the vessel is involved in a collision.
When the vessel sustains damage caused by stevedores, the Master should immediately put the
stevedores on notice in writing that they will be held responsible for the damages. Failure to so act
may prejudice Owners claim against their H & M Underwriters, who would be liable for stevedore
damage repair costs, provided reasonable efforts have been made to recover from the third party and
provided the repair costs exceeds the deductible.
When the vessel is involved in a collision it is imperative that the Master does not admit liability,
regardless of his inward feelings. He will probably be instructed by his Management office to call in the
local P & I representatives (if in port) and the question of liability should be left to them. The Master
must in all cases hold the other vessel responsible in writing.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -5-
In both these cases the Management office will require copies of such letters written by the Masters.
In cases where a claim on H & M Underwriters might result, full copies of all logbook entries covering
both the incident and the repair period should be forwarded to the Management office at the first
opportunity after the event.
Where the incident is serious a Superintendent is usually sent to the vessel from the Management
office and where possible the above mentioned documentation should be made ready for him to bring
back.
In summary, whenever his vessel sustains damage of any sort and howsoever caused (other than
anything, which is obviously of a wear and tear nature) the following steps should be taken by a
Master:-
a) He should immediately inform the Management office of the nature and the extent of the
damage, so far as it can be ascertained, with an estimated repair cost whenever possible.
b) If there is a possibility that the repair cost might exceed the policy deductible,
c) He and/or the Chief Engineer should prepare full written reports and submit them to the
Management office as soon as practicable.
d) Copies of all logbook entries relating to the incident and the subsequent repair period, should
be take and submitted to the Management office as soon as practicable.
e) If the ship’s staff assist with damage repairs, he should prepare a receipted statement
detailing the work done, hours worked and payments received.
f) If the damage is caused by stevedores he should promptly put them on written notice that
they will beheld liable, a copy of the letter should be sent to the Management office as soon
as practicable
It should be understood that the cost of repairing any damages directly caused by ‘negligence of the
vessel’s crew’ is recoverable on most H & M policies; accordingly it often arises that there is little to be
gained and must to be lost by a stubborn refusal to accept the oversights or temporary
thoughtlessness can occur.
It should however also be understood that the cost of repairing damages resulting from
‘incompetence’ is rarely recoverable under H & M policies.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -6-
It will be realised that when H & M Underwriters limit their cover almost entirely to physical damage to
a vessel, many Shipowners find it desirable to protect themselves against some of the many other
risks associated with the operation of ocean going vessels.
This they can do by banding themselves together in P & I Clubs whereby they are mutually protected
against certain additional risks. The P & I cover is divided into the two obvious categories namely,
Protection on the one hand and Indemnity on the other. Protecting risks included personal injury,
other crew liabilities, collision liability not covered under H & M policies, damage to piers and other
objects, quarantine expenses, removal of wrecks, also liability under towage contracts. Provision is
also made for damage to other vessels, apart from collision, such as excessive wash, fire, explosion,
or by the dropping of objects overboard. Indemnity cover relates to Shipowners’ liability to cargo for
pilferage, non-delivery, damages, over carriage and so on. It also covers immigration and customs
fines arising from negligence of the Master and crew. P & I Clubs do not pay claims in respect of
damage to the ‘entered’ vessel.
As the case of Hull and Machinery claims, P & I claims are also subject to ‘deductibles’; the difference
is, however, that the deductibles attaching to P & I claims vary according to the nature of the claim
whereas the H & M policy deductible, once fixed, is the same for any type of accident within a specific
policy year, unless special provision is made for an operation such as lighterage, where the risk of
contact/collision damages is greatly increased.
Ideally a Master should be aware of the deductible attaching to each type of claim but in practice this
is rarely the case and in the absence of such specific knowledge, a Master should assume that any
costs of the nature described above which are incurred will be recoverable.
Discretion is required as to whether urgent advices need to be sent to the Management office in the
event of a likely claim. However, as soon as the full facts are available the Master should provide his
Principals with the following documentation:-
a. A detailed report outlining:-
i. the cause and the extent of the damage/loss, and/or
ii. the reason for the bill/fine being incurred and the amount involved
Since the decision as to whether expenditure will be claimed from H & M underwriters or
P & I Clubs should be made by the Management office, they should be in full possession of all the
facts; accordingly all incidents should be reported to them and clarification should be sought promptly
when a Master may be in doubt.
The above requirements are complementary to and do not replace any of the standing reporting or
operational duties of a Master.
PART II
ATTENTION: CHIEF ENGINEERS
The purpose of these notes is to clarify what is required of a Chief Engineer in circumstances, which
may give rise to a claim on the vessel’s Hull and Machinery insurance policy.
It is unreasonable to expect a Chief Engineer to have detailed knowledge of what cover is afforded by
a specific set of clauses and it is therefore best for him to work on the assumption that, if the damage
is ‘accidental’, even if the ‘accident’ results from a wear and tear situation, the repair cost will probably
be recoverable. There are, of course, exceptions to this rule but, where accidental damage repair
costs are not recoverable, the Management office will know and the Chief Engineer can be informed.
It is a standard procedure for Underwriters to insist that all H & M policies should contain an Excess or
‘Deductible’ which means that the Assured (The Shipowner or his Agent) will only be able to recover
costs in excess of this figure where the damage has been caused by a peril insured against. The
Deductible applies to ‘each separate accident or occurrence’. It varies from vessel to vessel and is
usually fixed after assessing such things as the vessel’s age, her insured value and the Owners
previous claims record.
Whenever there is a breakdown of, or damage to a vessel’s machinery and the repair itself costs are
likely to exceed the Hull and Machinery (H & M) policy deductible, provided the damage itself is not
normal wear and tear there is likely to be a claim on the H & M Underwriters. The Management office
will decide whether a claim is to be proceeded with or waived.
At this point it is appropriate to mention that most H & M policies DO cover loss of or damage to a
vessel directly caused by the ‘negligence’ of the Master, Officers and Crew.
This is, of course, a sensitive area since nobody likes to admit his or her mistakes. It must however be
remembered that nobody is perfect and, when oversight and temporary thoughtlessness can and
does occur there is a very definite need for Shipowners to cover themselves against the resultant
costs.
It will be appreciated that a slight error can cause very extensive damage thereby incurring
considerable repair costs, accordingly Management offices are often intolerant of stubborn refusals to
accept that a certain member of the vessel’s complement may have made a mistake.
Whilst it is important for a Chief Engineer to be aware that the cost of repairing negligence damages
can be claimed against H & M Underwriters, it is equally important that he realises damages resulting
from ‘incompetence’ are rarely claimable. It cannot be stressed too heavily that the word
‘incompetence’ should be avoided when the cause of damage is being discussed for insurance
purposes, unless it has been approved by the Management office.
Any machinery breakdown likely to give rise to an insurance claim should be reported immediately to
the Management office since they in turn are obliged to give prompt notice to their Underwriters. A full
written report will be required as soon as practicable. However the initial advice should be as
comprehensive as possible including, where possible, the extent of the damage, how it was caused
(being as specific as possible) what immediate repairs are required and whether they can be effected
by ship’s personnel.
If an insurance claim is to be made a Surveyor normally attends the vessel on behalf or Underwriters
and a Superintendent usually attends from the Management office. The Superintendent has usually
been made aware of the specific insurance cover/requirement, so, unless instructed to the contrary, it
is better that the Chief Engineer does not get involved in discussions with other Surveyors regarding
the cause of damage, etc.
Frequently ship’s staff assist with Damage repairs and, where this happens, the Chief Engineer
should prepare a statement, to be signed by those individuals who assisted with the repair, detailing
the work done, the hours worked and the payments received specific to the job - not overtime.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -8-
One additional item required from the Chief Engineer when an insurance claim is to be made is a
statement of all fuel consumed and engine room stores used during periods when damage repairs are
being effected and during deviation periods should the vessel have to put into a port of refuge, also
any overtime incurred by the crew should be tabulated separately.
In summary therefore, the requirements of a Chief Engineer at times of damage or breakdown are as
follows:-
1. Decide whether the damage is normal wear and tear or has some accidental cause.
2. If there is a possibility that the damage repair costs might exceed the H & M policy deductible
and assuming the damage to be accidental he should:-
3. Send a full written report to the Management office elaborating upon, and amending where
necessary, the facts in the preliminary advise.
4. If the crew assist with damage repairs, send to the Management office a receipted statement
detailing the work done, the hours worked and payments received.
5. Prepare a statement of the fuel consumed and the stores used during repair and/or deviation
periods and send same to the Management office.
The above requirements are complementary to and do not replace any standing reporting or
operational duties of a Chief Engineer. PLEASE BE GUIDED ACCORDINGLY
Due Diligence
Both the ITC (Hull) 1.10.83 Clause 5.2 and the Additional Perils Clause are subject to a due diligence
provision which state that the insurance covers a loss provided such “loss or damage has not resulted
from want of due diligence by the Assured, Owners or Managers” For the purposes of this section it
would suffice to say this duty is a personal one of the Assured, Owners or Managers and with the
advent of instant communication needs to be reviewed carefully. One may add that strictly, the burden
of proof is on the Owner to show that this clause has been complied with rather than the Insurers having
to show that the Owners have failed in this respect.
In the event of an occurrence, likely to lead to a claim under a policy, there are certain implied or
unwritten duties and certain express or written duties imposed on the Insured. The implied duties
requires that the Assured should act as if he were uninsured and take all reasonable steps to
minimise his loss. In addition, almost all policies specifically provide that the Insurer needs to be
notified immediately of any event, which could give rise to a claim under the policy.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page -9-
Principal Participants
Usually, for marine hull particular average claims, be they partial loss or total loss, the following principal
participants are involved - the vessel’s Officers and its crew, the Shipowner/Manager’s Superintendents,
the Repairers, the Shipowner/Manager’s Insurance Department, the Underwriters’ Surveyor, the
Classification Society’s Surveyor, and the Average Adjuster, besides the Underwriters themselves and
the Brokers.
There are other situations, like in general average or collision or contact damage claims when, in
addition to the above, a P & I Club Surveyor and/or a Surveyor acting in General Average Interest
and/or a Salvor and/or a Cargo interests or other Third party’s Surveyor may also be involved.
After a loss of damage has occurred, usually the vessel’s Master notifies the Shipowner / Manager
(assured) who in turn notifies, usually through his insurance department, the broker of the same. The
broker then notifies the leading underwriter and the leading underwriter instructs the broker to appoint
a surveyor to represent the underwriting interests. Depending on the circumstances the Shipowners /
Managers may send a Superintendent to attend and/or the Classification Society may be asked to
attend. The appointment of the other prominent participants follows logically, as required. With
satellite communication facilities this process can now be completed very quickly.
Role of Underwriters’ Surveyor
The Underwriters’ Surveyor is in attendance to represent his principal’s interests and ensure that
nobody manipulates the system for their own ends. Most often these surveys / attendance’s are after a
vessel has suffered a casualty and repairs are about to commence, though in larger cases such
attendance may commence at the location of the accident.
He is not concerned with interpreting the policy of insurance, nor is he concerned with settling the claim.
He is there to accurately record the technical history and facts of the case, including a fiscal appreciation
of the situation and report this to the Underwriters.
He may recommend:-
A method of repair,
Or preparing of a repair specification and obtaining tenders, though the actual repairs put in hand are
the owner’s privilege.
Nevertheless, Underwriters are only liable for the reasonable cost or repair of the damage. This
Surveyor will also if requested, assist the Shipowner / Manager in negotiating settlement of the accounts
with the repairers.
He has two further primary functions at such an attendance.
One is to approve the cost of repairs, as put forth by the Assured’s Representative, as being fair and
reasonable and relevant to the casualty and ascertain if any salvage credit is due to Underwriters. The
other is to independently investigate the cause of the damage.
Role of Assured’s Representative
At this juncture it might be worth pointing out that it is the Shipowners / Managers or their
representatives duty to bring to the notice of the Underwriters’ Surveyor the nature and extent of
damage, therefore, as quite often happens, if further damages are discovered during a repair, the
Surveyor must be called back and this pointed out to him, to enable the two parties to agree upon the
total extent of damage due to the alleged occurrence (s).
Elementary evidence such as the logbooks, Master’s or Chief Engineer’s report(s), etc., must also be
provided to the Underwriter’s Surveyor for his perusal and study.
It is also the Shipowner / Manager’s privilege to put forward the cause(s) of damage(s), which the
underwriters’ Surveyor will autonomously investigate and try to reach an agreement with the
Shipowners / Manager’s Representative.
If the cause of damage is technically straight forward to the Shipowners / Manager’s Representative,
as also the extent of damage, then he should endeavour to agree this with the attending Surveyor at
the time of survey, as considerable time can be saved by this exercise.
However, as fairly often happens these issues may be complicated either owing to more than one
damage being in the same area or because it is difficult to distinguish between what is damage and
what is wear and tear, etc.
In such cases where the evidence is not all clear or the facts are complicated, it is advisable not to
make an allegation to the attending Underwriters’ Surveyor until the matter has been properly
researched and discussed with the Insurance Department and / or Average Adjusters.
The Role of the Average Adjuster is to state the claim on the Hull policy and it is then up to Hull
Underwriters to study the claim and decide whether or not to pay it.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 11 -
A Shipowner / Manager depends upon the skill, the honesty and discretion of his officers
and crew for the carrying out his business transaction, in which the property at risk is of huge value.
Overconfidence and ignorance are probably the main pitfalls, which ensnare the staff onboard, and
endeavours should be made to reduce these factors. It may also be noted that owing to the facility of
modern communication between the ship and its Owner / Manager, the authority of a Master or Chief
Engineer has, in practice, been greatly curtailed.
“Prevention is better than cure”, but in-spite of every care, accidents are bound to occur from time to
time. When they do the circumstances of the accident and particulars of the damage or injury should be
carefully and precisely logged, as a matter or course. Furthermore, such incidents should be reported to
the Shipowner / Manager at once so that the necessary investigations may be set in motion as soon as
possible. Prompt investigation, while everything in a manner of speaking is warm, is a powerful aid to
the quick settlement of a claim.
In cases involving broken gear or tackle, the broken part should be carefully preserved and should on no
account, be removed from on board, by any unauthorised person. Such parts are often of vital
importance in defeating a counterclaim or expeditiously settling a marine hull claim. On the other hand,
by its evidence, it may lead to an early avoidance of heavy costs of contesting an action that ought
never to have been commenced.
Depending on the circumstances of a casualty, a Shipowner / Manager may decide not to send out a
Superintendent to attend or he might not be able to get there in time and it may be left to the Ship’s
Master and Chief Engineer to liase with the concerned parties, in the interim.
Often the duration between the initial damage survey and completion of repairs / final survey at a port of
repair is quite substantial and the Superintendent and/or the Underwriters’ Surveyor are, in the
meantime, gainfully employed elsewhere, leaving it to the Ship’s officers to shoulder the responsibility of
ensuring that the repairs (which may be fairly uncomplicated) are carried out to their satisfaction and to
record the events that transpire during this period.
In any case, the Ship’s Officers and Crew are “the people on board”, who are most often perhaps best
aware of the full facts or “real story” surrounding the casualty and therefore have an important role to
play in this whole process of making Hull claims.
Preparation of Documents
Log Books
Though it is the duty of a Chief Officer to maintain a deck log and use all possible care in verifying the
accuracy of statements made in it, it is recommended that a Master, as a matter of prudence, does not
fail to make regular examinations of its contents, particularly on matters other than those concerning the
routine data of the day to day navigation or during the periods following a casualty and during its repairs.
This practice should also be adhered to in connection with the engine room log books, which in addition
to routine entries should always give details of all inspections and tests made of bilges, etc., valves,
pipes and any overhaul or repair work carried out by the ship’s or other personnel. Unless a separate
book is provided this log should also incorporate the regular soundings taken of the bilges and tanks
during the voyage and after a casualty.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 12 -
It may be emphasised that no entry of an important nature should be made without due consideration.
Such entries or reports should be presented in as clear, orderly and precise a manner as possible.
These entries should endeavour to stick to the facts of a case and avoid exaggeration. It must always be
remembered that a careless or inconsistent record of an incident, or a report badly made, perhaps due
to the officer being unfamiliar with the language of correspondence or otherwise, may seriously
prejudice the Shipowners / Manager’s interests - e.g. in relation to ship’s Underwriters or cargo interests.
To avoid doubts and suspicion, alteration and obliteration’s should be avoided, not only in the deck and
engine log book, but also the scrap deck and engine log books, as in any investigation these latter
documents also come under scrutiny, primarily because they are often the most contemporaneous
ones.
Much of what has been said above is also relevant to entries in the official logbook. In addition it must be
borne in mind that these entries should be made as soon as possible after the occurrence to which they
relate and the respective dates of the occurrence and the entry should be stated.
In the case of these depositions, the necessity for accuracy, care and consistency is as relevant, if not
intensified.
This is because they are sometimes taken by men who are imperfectly acquainted with the nautical
and/or engineering expertise / experience of the subject matter and who may therefore, unless properly
informed and guided, merely perform their duties perfunctorily. Then, again, the ship staff who depose
before “another” interest’s representative, are often, by reason of worry and fatigue to which they have
been recently exposed, in a state of mind and body which might well cause them to provide a hasty or
partial narration of the facts of the case. Lastly, either of the earlier factors may lead to an ill-timed
indifference on the part of the officer deposing, all of which, needless to say, can seriously prejudice the
Shipowners / Manager’s interest.
In general, one should endeavour to ensure every material detail in the reports, entries and depositions
on a casualty, where correspondingly appropriate, agree with each other. This can be done by referring
to the logbook for the purpose of refreshing the memory.
Last but not least, establishing a good relationship with the attending Surveyor is more likely to give your
Shipowner / Manager the benefit of the doubt in areas where the claim may not be at its strongest.
Noting Protest
Whenever a ship has experienced heavy weather or had an accident, in the course of her voyage and
has suffered damage as a result and/or the cargo has suffered loss or damage (or it is feared may have
done so), it is usual for the Master to note protest. This should be made before the relevant authority,
usually the notary public or his foreign equivalent or Consul representing Ship’s flag. This is important
because on the Continent and elsewhere including Latin America, this document is received as
evidence. Often, it is essential that the protest be lodged, as soon as possible, after the vessel’s arrival
in port, to enable the Shipowner to legally enforce his rights - e.g. for General Average contribution from
cargo.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 13 -
All the relevant circumstances of the casualty and the full extent/details of the damage should be
incorporated into this note, and as mentioned earlier this document should agree with corresponding
other entries and/or reports made on board for the casualty. This protest can be extended if further
damage from the same accident is subsequently discovered.
Protests of another kind are sometimes necessary - e.g. by reason of damage to ship by stevedores,
etc. All such protests should be made in writing and best endeavours should be made to obtain the
acknowledgement of it from the other party. Irrespective of whether such protests or notifications are
acknowledged, the protests must be properly recorded in the ship’s log, photographs taken, to be used
later as evidence and Charterers and Shipowners / Managers immediately informed of the same, with a
request for arranging a joint damage survey, if this is felt necessary.
Reports / Statements
The need for maintaining accuracy, care and consistency is also required while making out a report or
statement on a casualty or a particular aspect of it.
As has been mentioned earlier, here also consideration must be given to ensure it is made out in a
clear, orderly and precise manner. Since such reports are often not made out contemporaneously and
the author, therefore, may have more time to prepare and present the document, a higher degree of
the above criteria is usually expected in these reports. Correspondingly, they are also required to be
fairly detailed though exaggeration and conjecture here also should be avoided.
Such reports should be duly checked, signed and rubber-stamped and any alterations or
amendments done prior to signing or after should be initialled by the author in the left/right hand
margin.
These messages by nature are brief; therefore, care should be taken to ensure that facts are not
distorted or details do not appear misleading, when compressing the message for transmission.
Perhaps, some issues are best conveyed by elaborate description / detail.
With communications available now, any casualty or damage claim is best conveyed to WALLEM with
elaborate descriptions and details.
General
Certain terms in insurance parlance such as - accident, occurrence and incident, when used in the
plural can often mean the application of more than one deductible to a claim and therefore should be
used with care when reporting.
Other terms in insurance terminology have very precise meanings and may limit the cover offered
like - latent defect, wear and tear, error in design, faulty material, improper or insufficient
maintenance, corrosion and inadequate upkeep, when used the context of cause of damage.
Therefore, us of such terms should be avoided when reporting or in conversation / deposing to
Underwriters / other Surveyors, etc.
Attempts to prescribe a damage or its cause to a certain date in the past should also be avoided or
done only after careful analysis as such comments can have implications as to whether the current
policy is affected or not.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date : June 2007
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 14 -
It is not possible to provide a list of all the areas which need caution when reporting not is it possible
to provide a complete list of what information needs to be provided in the log books, or more
importantly ship’s officer’s reports during and after a casualty. What follows is an attempt to provide a
brief rough guideline.
The most common marine hull claims are those arising from collisions or contacts, heavy weather, fire,
salvage, machinery damage, Charterer’s negligence and general average.
For all these casualties, the officer’s reports should incorporate:
If the casualty is a collision or contact damage, photographs of the damage and an accurate record of
the events including movements / speed etc., just prior and after the accident should also be
incorporated. Such reports are usually made in consultation with the ship’s P & I Club Representative
or a Solicitor. Refer to “Mariners Role in Collecting Evidence.”
If the casualty is due to a fire, a record should be kept of what was damaged by fire and by
extinguishing methods, especially water.
If the damage is due to heavy weather then the report should incorporate an accurate record of the
wind, current and sea state encountered, giving dates / timings for same and recording what exactly
was damaged, including fore castle’ stores.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 15 -
If the damage is such, - e.g., machinery damage, where it is difficult to establish the cause or time of
damage, details of its past history will have to be provided, including details of the last overhaul,
renewal, inspection and by whom, running hours since last overhaul / renewal / inspection and in
total, if relevant.
If the damage is a generator breakdown and a temporary generator is hired, then details of such hire,
including date / timing of generators arrival on board / installation commission / decommission and
landing ashore should also be incorporated.
If it is a case involving general average and cargo is also discharged, or even otherwise, the report
should incorporate full details of cargo quantity and number of Bills of Lading per manifest, including
brief description of cargo on board. Details of which cargo and how much has been discharged and /
or reloaded, after completion of repairs with dates / timings of these operations.
In the case of a salvage claim involving salvage under L.O.F. with a view to minimise Shipowners /
Manager’s quantum of award to Salvors a close monitoring of the operation should be maintained
with a view to :
(a) Minimise the Salvors exaggerated claims of having made heavy inputs into the operation in
terms of skill and effort, - of having faced and overcome a high degree of danger / risk to
themselves and the casualty, of being very prompt and efficient in their services, etc.,
(b) To state the facts accurately. All this should then be incorporated in the statements and
reports.
Depending on the casualty, such reports should be accompanied by copies of the deck and engine log
books covering the relevant period, a copy of the note of protest, a copy of the Class Surveyors
temporary report / recommendations, work orders, defect list, wages and maintenance sheet of the
officers and crew, a copy of the Bill of lading especially incorporating its reverse side and details of
bunkering during the voyage and first opportunity thereafter should accompany reports involving general
average situations.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 16 -
Conclusion
Information is essential to the insurance claim and without the same, the Shipowner / Manager cannot
quickly recover the money they have spent out.
When the Master can do all of the above on each claim, he will make the claim handling efficient. More
importantly the Owners will be pleased because the action would have significantly cut down the
amount of time by which they are out of pocket and not reimbursed by Hull Underwriters for the monies
paid out following a casualty.
While this from Ship’s staff point of view may require a bit more organisation / effort initially, in the long
run it saves everyone considerable time and correspondence (all of which is money), which often occurs
when the problem is no longer fresh in ones mind and records or the relevant personnel are more
difficult to locate.
Name of specialist :
Also include time sheet and work done report ;
10. Photographs.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 17 -
1. General
These instructions apply to all ships which carry liquid cargoes and are to be strictly complied with.
With the high, continually rising value of mineral oils, claims against ships for short discharge are
increasing.
Remember an “ Independent Inspector / Surveyor “ is independent in name only. Expect him to give
the ships interest low priority, and make sure he is accompanied by an Officer at all times. An
experienced Officer may well be more “expert” than the Inspector, As soon as it becomes apparent
that you do not agree, protest.
2.1. Ship’s ullages and calculations for cargo on board after loading at the first loading port.
2.2. This document must show how much of the cargo was slops on board prior to loading.
2.3 Ship’s ullages and calculations for cargo on board prior to and after loading at each
subsequent loading port. Ship’s ullages and calculations for cargo on board prior to
discharging at the first discharging port.
Where cargo remains on board after discharge is completed, details of the amount of cargo
remaining at the bottom of each cargo tank.
2.6. Where there is more than one discharge port, ullages and calculations for cargo on board
prior to sailing for, and on arrival at each subsequent port.
2.7. Any reports of survey carried out on behalf of Owners and/or Charterers.
2.8. All claim documents and any other documentation relating to the cargo carried on the voyage
in question.
2.9 Ship’s ullages and calculations showing the amount of any slops on board prior to loading the
next cargo.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date :---
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 18 -
A. Ship To Be Lightened(STBL)
A.1. Ship’s ullages and calculations for cargo on board after loading at the first loading port.
A.2. Ship’s ullages and calculations for cargo on board prior to and after loading at each
subsequent loading port.
A.3. Ship’s ullages and calculations for cargo on board prior to discharging into each
lightening ship.
A.3.1. Ship’s ullages and calculations for cargo remaining on board after the departure
of each lightening ship.
A.4. When discharge into lightening ships is completed, a calculation of any cargo, which
remains at the bottom of cargo, tanks.
A.4.1. Reasons for incomplete discharge must be provided.
A.5. Any reports of survey carried out on behalf of Owners and/or Charterers.
A.6. Ship’s ullages and calculations showing the amount of any slops on board prior to
loading the next cargo.
B. Lightening Ship
3B.1. Ship’s ullages and calculations for cargo on board after loading from the STBL.
3B.1.1. This document must show how much of the cargo was slops on board prior to loading.
4. Corrections
Details of all corrections applied must be shown. e.g. trim correction, list correction,
temperature correction etc.
5. Undischarged Cargo
5.1. Samples must be drawn from any tank in which cargo remains after completion of discharge.
5.1.3. These samples are to be retained on board (in a dedicated Locker, preferably the paint locker
which has fixed fire fighting arrangement) for later analysis, if necessary.
If, for any reason, it is impossible to draw a sample, this fact must be recorded and agreed by
an installation representative.
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 8 Issue Date : 31.3.98
Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Rev.No. / Date : June 2007
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
Page - 19 -
Although Charter Parties forbid deduction of any kind from freight, it is not uncommon to deduct CIF
Value of Cargo remaining on board from Freight Dues / Charter Hire.
It means lengthy litigation involving the P & I Club and at time Solicitors to get back dues.
Should Cargo “ROB” be “ High” the P& I Club local Correspondent (and WALLEM) must be notified.
The commercial department of owners or the commercial operators would also have their own
requirements with respect to notification in case of High cargo “ROB” and these are also to be complied
with.
In many cases, the OBQ on board prior loading would be subtracted from the ROB after discharging.
Hence, it is essential for ships to show realistic and accurate OBQ prior loading.
The Club correspondent should be given all details of restrictions imposed on the vessel ( had there
been any), weather conditions ( both air and sea), heating capabilities including drawing of heating coils
above tank bottom, voyage carrying temperature orders, etc.,
As soon as feasible and practicable the cargo “ROB” must be consolidated into slop tank and quantity
informed to WALLEM. The course of action to pursue will be discussed with the Charterers / Owners
and Master advised.
WALLEM SECTION 9 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT SHIP INTERNAL AUDIT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Page -1- Approved by : Directors
(!) Frequency of Audit : The vessel audit is to be carried out is one per Calendar year. The audit
Should not exceed 12 months from the date of previous audit
Audits are normally arranged between 9 to 12 months of the previous audit.
Internal ISM audits of ships will be carried out by a Marine Superintendent or
Technical Superintendent. In rare cases, it may not be possible to carry out
audit due vessel calling at remote ports or other reasons. In such cases,
requirements of flag administration to be complied with. If the flag
administration has a provision to issue special authorization, this should be
obtained. If the flag state does not have a directive or instructions, a special
authorization would be issued by Marine Safety ( Manager and above in
MSQR/Compliance) on a case by case basis. The authorization would be
issued for the period till the vessel is in a convenient port but would not
exceed three months.
Every effort would be made to complete audit within required time frame. In
an extreme case, Heads of fleet to be informed and resources allocated on a
priority if the audit cannot be completed within the 3 month extension period.
The flag state and RO are to be informed immediately and requested to
provide an extension letter till the audit is completed. The RO and Flag would
be informed of the extraordinary circumstance which resulted in the audit not
being completed within the 3 month extension period.
The extension letter will be sent to the ship. Once the audit is completed, the
completed audit report will be submitted to flag/RO.
Ship’s internal audit may also be done by joining Master and Chief Engineer,
provided they have done an internal auditor’s course, and that the audit is
completed prior to their taking over charge. A office executive (Marine
superintendent or Technical superintendent) visit will then be arranged to
attend the ship at the earliest opportunity and a re-audit carried out.
Purpose of audit : Internal auditing is a very powerful management tool when used in the proper
manner and with management support. Audits are the dynamic elements in a
Quality Assurance System. The effectiveness of the Quality and Safety
system can be evaluated by audits where areas that need improvement may
be identified.
Terms of reference : ISM Code, Shipboard Management Manual Parts I, II & III, Safety Manual,
Bridge Procedure manual, EMS Manual and ship related documents listed in
the “Overview of Ship & Office Documents”
NON-CONFORMITY
Non-conformity means an observed situation where the objective
evidence indicates the non-fulfillment of a specified requirement as
required by the ISM code and the companies SMS system or a deviation
from the companies policies and procedures as stated in the manuals.
OBSERVATION
An observation is Potential Non conformity or a suggestion of
improvement by the auditor to the SMS system and the management
system in the area being audited with respect to the companies SMS
system and the ISM code. A potential Non conformity would lead to Non
conformity in the future if the corrective action is not implemented in
time.
CORRECTIVE ACTION
Corrective action is an action taken to eliminate the cause of the Non
conformity or the potential Non Conformity. It refers to steps to be taken
immediately to correct the situation and to bring the procedures in line
with the requirements of the companies SMS system.
PREVENTIVE ACTION
Preventive action is the corrective measure to prevent the recurrence of
the Non conformity or the potential Non conformity. While the corrective
action would lead to the correction of the Non conformity or the
WALLEM SECTION 9 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT SHIP INTERNAL AUDIT Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Page -3- Approved by : Directors
Audit Procedures : a) Allow 6 to 8 Hrs for the audit. Actual times will depend upon operational
constraints of the vessel being audited, familiarity of the Auditor and Ships’
staff to Company’s SMS system and the ISM code.
b) Conduct an Opening Meeting with the Master and Chief Engineer present,
others may be present if ships’ operation permits.
The meeting is to inform the staff on the audit terms of reference and audit
schedule i.e. which staff the Auditor will interview with time and duration.
c) Conduct audit as per Guidelines and Checklist provide hereto in section. The
Checklist is “Objective” (Yes or No Type). A Logical “No” status would usually
require a NCN or Observation report (as applicable), unless no specific
parameters are mentioned.
d) Write up NCN / Observation Report(s) and have Master and/or Chief Engineer
(as applicable) accept them. The Immediate cause and the Root cause are to be
to be completed by Master or Chief Engineer as applicable after discussing with
the auditor. The corrective action and preventive action to be completed by
Master or Chief Engineer as applicable after discussing with the auditor. Please
exercise due attention whilst completing the audit NCN/Observation report
to ensure all sections are signed and dated. (This is checked during
Company’s External Audits)
The audit in hand should not exceed 8 man hours of any department.
Audit Follow up : a) The Auditor is responsible for handing the Audit Summary, along with the
NCN/Observation reports to the Fleet Cell. The Master will send the audit
summary along with the NC / observation note to the fleet address.
b) The vessel’s Superintendent is responsible for ensuring that the corrective
action and Preventive action Plan is approved and completed by the given
implementation due date.
Note: The Corrective action and the preventive action for the Audit NCN
/ Observations action must be implemented within the implementation
due date as marked by the auditor. If extension is required, the report
must be annotated accordingly. Review of the effectiveness of the
corrective and preventive action must be carried out during the next
(!) visit on board by a (Marine superintendent/ Technical superintendent or
Office Executive). A copy of the NC / Observation note with the
completed verification section should be forwarded to the Marine
Superintendent.
(e) The Marine Superintendent will maintain one set of Records of all vessel
Internal Audits.
(f) The Marine Superintendent will advise the vessels when internal audits are
due and arrange for an attendance of the vessel. In some cases, an alternate
superintendent would be requested to carry out the internal shipboard audits.
WALLEM SECTION 10 Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Issue Date : 31.3.98
Checked by : Director (Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT AUDIT CHECKLIST Rev.No. / Date : Dec 2016
MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Directors
Page -1-
Notes for Auditor: The checklist is to be checked and filled during Internal audits. The Items
mentioned are part of Wallem’s Marpol Compliance Program (WMCP). Any Non conformity in this
section is not to be issued as a NC/Observation of the Internal audit. Any Non conformity/
observations are to be immediately reported to the Fleet Cell with plan for corrective action.
Auditor :
Vessel :
Date of Audit :
The Internal Audit was commenced with an Opening meeting on ___________(date) at __________(time).
The opening meeting was attended by the Auditor, Master, Chief Engineer,
__________________________(Insert rank of any other staff who attended).
The opening meeting was used to inform the staff on the scope and methodology of the audit as well as the
audit terms of reference and audit schedule.
Audit conducted as per Guidelines and Checklist provided and record sampling carried out. Various
emergency equipments were tested within the scope of the audit.
Interview of selected staff and sample checking of records carried out as part of the audit.
A closing meeting was carried out on _____________(date) at __________(Time)and the audit findings were
presented.
A total of _______ Non conformities and ________ Observations were raised during the audit.
__________________
Signature of the Auditor
NON-CONFORMITY NOTE (NC) / OBSERVATION(OBS) REPORT
Implementation Due Date : ______________ ( To be filled by auditor and should be a specific date but not more than 3 months from
date of audit).
IMMEDIATE CAUSE (To be completed by Master/Chief Engineer after discussing with Auditor )
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROOT CAUSE (To be completed by Master/Chief Engineer after discussing with Auditor )
CORRECTIVE ACTION (Fix Now)(To be completed by Master or Chief Engineer as applicable after discussing with Auditor)
NC / Obs Closed
Wallem executive ( Tech/ Marine / QMS Supdt) : _________________________ Review Date : _______________
(Name & Signature)
Note:
1. Observations include Potential Non Conformities.
2. Corrective Action & Preventive Action to be verified within the implementation due date.
Review of effectiveness of Corrective Action and Preventive Action to be completed at during a visit
of the Technical or Marine superintendent or Manager.
3. In Special circumstances, if an extension is required, the report must be claused accordingly and
approved by the Marine Department.
Rev. June 2016
WALLEM Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 12 Issue Date : 31.3.98
MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE Revised by : Director(Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT (MOC FOR VESSEL) Rev.No. / Date : Sept 2016
MANUAL – PART II Page -1- Approved by : Directors
12.1 Introduction :
Management of Change is the process to manage changes (except for “replacements in kind”) to
process, procedures or equipment. Management of Change is the process which provides the tools
and techniques for managing the people-side of change. Change is inevitable within any type of
business. It arises from the need to respond and adapt to varying conditions. Modifications may be
required to the equipment, operational policies, and organizational structure or personnel. Whenever a
change is made, the potential consequences of that change should be assessed before
implementation. History has illustrated the potential negative consequences associated with
uncontrolled change.
If a change is technically inappropriate, poorly executed, its risks poorly understood, or management
fails to ensure communication to key personnel, accidents or other undesired consequences can
result. Thus, a formal and effective management of change program plays a critical role in preventing
accidents and losses. A management of change program is one of the most challenging aspects of a
safety management system to implement successfully. It requires organizational support, assignment
of necessary resources, and a clear, defined process. The MOC procedures in this section are a tool
(!) to implement and maintain an effective management of change strategy to optimize existing safety and
risk management efforts.
(!) A Standard MoC form is used for the change management process.
(!) Management of Change (MOC) is a process to evaluate and properly manage any modifications to the
design, control, or operations of a covered process. This would ensure that the change is carried out
without any injury to personal, damage to environment or equipment or process loss.
(!) Most changes fall into one of the following categories: equipment, operational or organizational
changes.
(!) Operational: Changes in administrative or management system that define the way processes are
conducted on the vessel. Examples of operational changes include:
Personal: This category includes personnel and staffing modifications, such as changes to crew,
personnel, management structure on board, changes in watch routines.
Examples of Personal changes include:
New contractors (e.g., repair crews, crewing agencies, dry docks, repair facilities, etc.) if this is not
already covered by a procedure
Elimination of rank on board
Change in crew nationality for full crew
(!) There may be changes that overlap one or more categories (for example, a major technological
change may necessitate modifications to equipment, operations and organization).
Types of changes typically not governed by the MOC program include the following:
• Replacement in kind
A replacement-in-kind is a change wherein an item, process, or person meets the specified criteria for
the item it is replacing, if such criteria exist. This may take the form of an identical replacement, or an
alternative that is specifically designed within specifications criteria and therefore will not adversely
affect the function of the system.
• Changes that are covered via other management process such as:
- Routine personnel changes (crew rotation, shift or tour changes) controlled by operating
procedures, safe work practices, training, etc.
- Routine in-service changes where the operating procedures provide appropriate guidelines for
the change, and the operating procedures have been adequately reviewed prior to becoming
effective
All sea farers have the liberty to suggest modifications that they believe will have a positive impact on
their workplace. This is then forwarded to the senior management on board or the Master who would
then initiate the MOC process.
The first consideration after recognizing a potential change is deciding whether or not the change is a
replacement-in-kind. When there are no specifications or guidelines available, it is up to the
judgment of senior officers on board to decide if it is an in-kind replacement.
WALLEM Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 12 Issue Date : 31.3.98
MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE Checked by : Director (Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT (MOC FOR VESSEL) Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2016
MANUAL – PART II Page -3- Approved by : Directors
(!) If doubt persists regarding whether a change is in-kind, the Master is to proceed with the MOC
process, or consult with the Marine Superintendent or Technical superintendent who can help with
the determination.
12.6 Terminology
(!) Approver : Approves the Management of change that is prepared and checks that the Management
of Change has been completed. Level and Responsibility of Approver are provided in the Table 12.1
in Section 12.7 and Section 12.9.
(!) Change : Changes are modifications, additions, or substitutions for any aspect on board that are
outside present specifications.
(!) MOC Manager : MOC Manager has responsibility for the change process and would prepare the
MOC form and follow up on the process. Level and Responsibility of MOC Manager are provided in
the Table 12.1 1 of Section 12.7 and Section 12.9.
(!) MOC : Acronym for “Management of Change”. It is also used to refer to a proposed change that is
going through the management of change process.
(!) MOC Form : The MOC form the process to record each change. The form provides the guidelines to
manage the change process.
(!) MOC record: The MOC records for individual ships are maintained on the vessel. Record of all MOC
are maintained in the office.
(!) MOC Department Representative (Dept Reps) : The MOC Dept Reps would co-ordinate within their
department for the change process.
(!) MOC Reviewer : Reviews the MOC that has been completed and checks for improvements for future
MOC. Level and Responsibility of MOC Reviewer are provided in the Table 12.1 of Section 12.7 and
Section 12.9.
(!) MOC Work Process : For Major MOC that is being implemented across the fleet, an MOC work
process would be developed as an appendix for implementation on each ships. The MOC work
process would be reviewed and revised as required to include any improvements as the process as
the MOC process is implemented on each ship
Replacement-in-kind. When an item, process, or person meets the existing specified criteria for the
item it is replacing, it is typically not considered a change, but a replacement-in-kind.
(!) MOC Coordinator. The MOC coordinator tracks MOC program performance, including the status of
MOCs and MOC actions points. Manager of MSQR is the MOC Coordinator
WALLEM Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 12 Issue Date : 31.3.98
MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE Revised by : Director(Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Sept 2016
MANUAL – PART II Page -4- Approved by : Directors
(!) 12.7 MOC PROCESS: An overview of the MOC process is depicted in the flowchart
Recognition of Change
Yes
Replacement in MOC not required
Kind
No
Step 1.0 Complete preliminary risk assessment
Initial risk assessment
and verification of risk
assessment
Verification of Initial risk assessment
No
(!) The MOC process has the following 5 distinct steps, as follows:
(!) The following levels of have been set for the Initial risk assessment verification, MOC Manager, approver and
MOC Reviewer
Initial risk Verification of Initial MOC Manager MOC Approver MOC Reviewer
assessment risk assessment
Category
Low Manager and above Master/Chief Marine /Technical Fleet Manager
of MSQR Engineer superintendent
/Compliance
Medium Manager and above Marine /Technical Fleet Manager/ Marine Director /
of MSQR superintendent Manager and above Technical
/Compliance of MSQR Director
or Heads of fleet /Compliance
High Heads of Fleet Manager and above Marine Director / WSM Managing
of MSQR Technical Director Director
/Compliance
or Heads of fleet
Table 12.1
Once a change request has been made, the expected(presumptive) MOC Manager would carry out
the initial risk assessment. The company risk assessment template would be used to identify the
hazards. Once the initial risk assessment is completed, the risk assessment would be sent for
verification as per Table 12.1.
If the Majority of the hazards are in particular category (Low/Medium/High), the MOC would be of the
same category and the MOC Manager would be as per Table 12.1 in this section.
Once initial risk assessment is completed, MOC Manager in consultation with the MOC approver
would then nominate the Department Representative who would assist him with the implementation
of the MOC.
MOC Manager would discuss with department representative and complete the MOC form. MOC
Form is complemented by MOC Manager in consultation with department Reps (MOC form will
include full risk assessment, action plan, documentation/plan change, training plan, and
communication plan).
All the stakeholders to the change would also be identified at this stage. This would include both
internal and external stakeholders.
risks caused by the change. The plan should also detail actions concerning the update and
development of documentation to support the design and operation of the revised system. The
MOC process described herein is targeted for permanent changes. However, two special types of
changes, emergency and temporary, need to be controlled but demand slight modifications to the
standard approach. Such a plan should describe how the change will be executed, what specific
actions must be carried out, including the risk control options, as well as time limits and
responsibilities for addressing the issues. Training plan and communication plan are key issues to
be determined and documented prior to the change being implemented.
Documentation:
Management of change requires effective documentation control. Documents from different areas
such as drawings, training manuals, software code, signage, etc., may need to be updated to
reflect an approved change.
It is important that both internal and external stakeholders are kept fully informed of the change
and the progress with respect to the implementation of the change, as applicable.
Changes involving significant revisions to current practices will require training of relevant personnel.
An awareness training, or in some cases, detailed training of the new practice should be provided.
The verification will be done by the MOC approver who would ensure that all the action points are
completed. MOC approver would also check that there is no residual risk after the implementation of
change and that required training and communication have been completed.
Temporary changes should be monitored to confirm that they are either converted to a permanent
change by completing the MOC process or reverted to their original state prior to the expiry date of
the MOC
WALLEM Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 12 Issue Date : 31.3.98
MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE Revised by : Director(Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Sept 2016
MANUAL – PART II Page -7- Approved by : Directors
Therefore, some of the questions to be answered during this verification step are as follows:
Review of MOC
The MOC Reviewer would review the MOC and check for any lessons that have been learnt from
the implementation of the change process. If there are any lessons to be learnt, this would be
informed to the MOC Coordinator. The MOC coordinator would collate and document the lesson
learnt for discussion in Management review and for implementation in future MOC’s.
Verification, Review and close out to be carried out within agreed time frame. Any extension of the
time frames to be approved by the MOC approver.
It should be identified during the Initial Review if the change falls into the category of temporary or
emergency.
This distinction is important as the MOC should offer some flexibility to control changes under these
special circumstances.
Temporary Changes:
A temporary change is one that is intended to exist for a short and predetermined period of time.
Management of change procedures for temporary changes should follow the same process as a
permanent change, but they are only valid for a specific time limit as they may carry a higher level of
risk that is acceptable only for a short term.
Temporary changes must have a specified time limit to ensure they are returned to the original
system condition or that further steps in managing the change are addressed (i.e., converting the
temporary change into a permanent change).
The intent is to make the change, and at some future date, the system will revert to its present or
design condition. The time limit for the change should be specified such that if the change does not
revert to the original condition, then a permanent change should be implemented.
Note that a conversion from a temporary to a permanent change requires that the MOC process be
initiated. This new process is intended to highlight improvements to the proposed change, such as
new risk control measures that offer a lower risk than the current temporary situation.
Example of temporary MOC : A fire alarm sensor in the engine room malfunctions and needs to be
deactivated until the required spare is available. A temporary MOC is carried out. As part of the
implementation plan, the measures to mitigate the risk include ensuring the engine room remains
manned, if operating under UMS. For this temporary change, the engine drawings, design
documentation did not require changing, but instead, a revised temporary procedure is implemented
to manage the change.
Emergency Changes
WALLEM Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 12 Issue Date : 31.3.98
MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE Revised by : Director(Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Sept 2016
MANUAL – PART II Page -8- Approved by : Directors
An emergency change is a change that must be performed in a true emergency. Generally, the
situation is such that action is required quickly, and the persons required to provide approvals may
(!) not be available to meet the requirements of the written MOC process. This would normally apply for
MOC carried out on board vessels.
In these “emergency” situations, safety could be jeopardized by waiting for completion of the formal
MOC process. In an emergency situation, the change should be reviewed to the best of the staff’s
abilities. This emergency MOC process should involve a risk assessment using any and all available
resources and time to evaluate the risks involved with the change and it may be verbal, rather than
written. The focus should be on the immediate risks only.
The verbal implementation plan should also be developed and carried out by relevant personnel, with
approval from the highest ranking personnel available. The Master or Chief Engineer should call the
superintendent to obtain oral approval for the emergency MOC.
At first opportunity after the emergency has been controlled, the change must be fully evaluated and
documented using the MOC procedure. The reviews will dictate if the change should be:
• MOC Manager:
(!) The MOC Manager has ultimate responsibility for the change and will be also be in charge of
monitoring the implementation of the change with the assistance of Department representatives.
(!) It is a primary responsibility of the MOC Manger to confirm that the change was implemented
according to the implementation plan, and subsequently, to verify that it is functioning as
intended.
• Approver:
The approver appraises the completed MOC form to confirm the need for change and validate
the risk assessments, implementation plan, training plan and communication plan.
• Reviewer
(!) The responsibility of the reviewer is to discuss with the MOC Mangers and review the MOC form.
It there are any lessons to be learnt, this would be communicated to the MOC Coordinator.
• MOC Coordinator
The MOC coordinator tracks MOC performance, including the status of MOCs.
At the time of Management Review, the MOC Coordinator would review the action plan of the
open MOC’s. He would also review the impact of all changes to ensure objectives have been met and
include the details in the Management review.
The MOC form is essentially the documented record of all plans, approvals, review and actions
associated with a change. The MOC form is essential to allow the necessary information to be
gathered and recorded efficiently and effectively.
WALLEM Prepared by : MSQR
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD SECTION 12 Issue Date : 31.3.98
MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE Revised by : Director(Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Rev.No. / Date : Sept 2016
MANUAL – PART II Page -9- Approved by : Directors
(!) Some changes would require for fleet wide implantation over a staggered period of time. Examples
are fitting of Ballast water treatment plant, fitting of second ECDIS etc. In such cases, a high risk
MOC would be prepared in the office. This would be complemented by a work practice which would
be generated as part of the action plan. The work practice would detail the steps that need to be
taken by a particular ship when the change is implemented on that ship. The work practice would
have the steps to be followed for action to be taken on the vessel, documentation changes,
communication to be done and training to be carried out for implementation of the change on that
vessel. Records of the Work practice would be obtained and kept with the MOC. Log would also be
maintained of the vessels that have completed the change and the remaining vessels to implement
the change.
Management of Change
For
Ver 4 / Oct 16
Completed by :
Verification by :
Note : The presumptive MOC Manager would carry out the preliminary risk assessment. Verification by
person as mentioned in the table 12.1 in Chapter 12 of SBM II.
Note : Low MOC : Master/Chief Engineer, Medium LOC – Marine/Technical Superintendent, High MOC –
Head of Fleet
MOC Approver (Name and Position/Rank; Based on Initial Risk assessment)
Ver 4 / Oct 16
Department Representatives
Name Rank/Position
Note : MOC Manager and Department Reps would identify the external stakeholders
Note : MOC Manager and Department Reps would identify the internal stakeholders
Yes N/A
Note: Risk Assessment is to be developed from initial risk assessment in standard Wallem template and
attached to this report.
Ver 4 / Oct 16
Impact on Safety
Impact on Environment
Impact on Security
Ver 4 / Oct 16
Lines of Responsibility
Based on the risk assessment and the action plan meeting of the MOC department coordinators.
The items on the action plan are to be transferred to a central database.
Document/Manual change plan, Training and communication plans can be prepared as required
and attached to the MOC
Ver 4 / Oct 16
Work Practice for High Level MOC for Fleet wide implementation
No. Work Practice detail Ver No. Responsibility
MOC Approver
Remarks
Ver 4 / Oct 16
MOC Manager
Confirm all action
points completed
MOC Approver
Verify all action
points completed
and change
implemented
MOC
Reviewer
Review the MOC
and check for any
lessons from the
MOC
Remarks after Review (Any lesson learnt to be forwarded to the MOC
Coordinator)
MOC Close Note : MOC close out and date can be done on database
out
Yes Date
Ver 4 / Oct 16
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD RISK ASSESSMENT Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : Jun 2010
FOR Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2014
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT CRITICAL OPERATIONS Approved by : Managing Director
MANUAL – PART II : RA-Navigation
APPENDIX 1 : Page 1
Appendix 1 of SBM II
Risk Assessment (RA) and Risk Management (RM)
The purpose of the RA and RM is to minimize risk to personnel, property and the environment. In this respect,
all activities that could adversely affect ship’s operations and performance are evaluated and appropriate
measures are taken to ensure that risk is either reduced or maintained at an acceptable level.
Risk is managed by identifying hazards, assessing consequences and probabilities and evaluating and
implementing prevention and mitigation measures.
• Job familiarity
• Practical experience with the job
• Information regarding incident/ operation / activity
• Active participation of persons running the risk
• Open mind for any suggestions
• Proper application of the RA methodology
• Identifying who should carry out the risk assessments: it is not necessary to involve everyone who
participates in the operation to participate in the risk assessment of this operation. However, the
hazards and the controls from the risk assessment should be discussed with the entire team that
would be involved with the operation.
• Risk assessments are to be prepared by Department heads. The hazards and control measures must
be discussed with their teams. Master’s and Chief Engineers must discuss the risk assessment with
the department head ( C/O and 2/E) prior to the work being carried out.
• All vessels are to send copy of risk assessment for unusual job and work on critical equipment to the
office. Work must only be commenced after dialogue with the office on the work being carried out.
The shut down period for critical operation is to be mentioned in the risk assessment.
• Tankers are to send copy of all risk assessments after the job is completed. This is in line with TMSA
2 requirements that records of risk assessment should be available in the office and on the ship. A
selected number of risk assessments would be reviewed in the office and feedback sent to the
tankers to ensure that a risk assessments of a consistent standard are prepared across the fleet.
Step 1: Identification of shipboard operations / systems / tasks and the work area.
• Residual Likelihood
• Residual Severity
• Calculation of Residual Risk Factor
• Acceptable – Go to step 8
• Intolerable – Contact Office
Step 10: After work is completed, evaluate the risk assessment for any missed hazard or new hazard.
Note : The risk assessment for the same job can be reviewed and used within a period of one month
or 4 times on the basis that there is no change in hazard of control measure. As an example, if
mooring is done after a week, the previous risk assessment for mooring can be reviewed for the next
operation.
RAs are conducted in order to identify and address potential hazards to personnel, property and the
environment, for:
a. Critical operations as mentioned in Section 3 of SBM II ( Company risk assessment available in SBM II)
b. in case of new operations/tasks
c. in case of unusual or non-routine jobs ( Risk assessment to be sent to office )
d. n case of work on critical equipment ( Risk assessment to be sent to office )
d. in case of changes to procedures or equipment. ( Tankers to also carry out Tanker initiated MOC)
e. prior to the introduction of new critical equipment or procedures. ( Tankers to also carry out Tanker initiated
MOC)
g. for preparation of complex or special jobs
h. Any operation in which there is deviation from procedures
.
A hazard is simply a situation/condition which has the capability to cause damage, harm or other loss. A
hazard can only be observed and recognized. Hazards are around us and cannot be taken away. Risk
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD RISK ASSESSMENT Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : Jun 2010
FOR Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2014
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT CRITICAL OPERATIONS Approved by : Managing Director
MANUAL – PART II : RA-Navigation
APPENDIX 1 : Page 3
The hazard is the cause of an event/accident therefore should not be confused with the event itself (e.g
hazard: fog – event/accident: collision).
In identifying a hazard the type of harm and to whom/what has also to be identified.
The purpose of this step is to identify and generate a prioritized list of hazards, specific to the problem under
review. This purpose is achieved by the use of standard techniques to identify hazards, which can
contribute to accidents, and by screening these hazards using a combination of available data and judgment.
The above are only a few examples and not an exhaustive list.
Given this knowledge, estimated risk of hazards can be used to make reliable decisions in terms of improving
safety by reducing the risk and risks can be reduced by reducing the severity of the consequences, reducing
the frequency/probability of occurrence or a combination of the two.
Frequency analysis is used to estimate how likely it is that the various incidents or hazards will occur (i.e. the
probability of occurrence).
Severity Assessment
Consequences may be grouped into three general categories: Safety, Environment and Vessel/Property
damage. A severity level is assigned for each of the 3 categories based on the consequences specified as
mentioned below
VESSEL / PROPERTY
SEVERITY HEALTH AND SAFETY ENVIORNMENT
DAMAGE
Release to environment,
EXTREME complete Loss of vessel or
Multiple or singly fatality long term large impact on
5 Financial loss >$ 1 million
environment
Major damage to vessel
Release to environment,
MAJOR with long layup repairs.
Injury requiring repatriation large impact on
4 Financial loss $ 100,000 - $
environment
1 million
Damage which can be
Release to environment,
MODERATE Loss time injuries excluding repaired during voyage.
Small to medium impact on
3 repatriation Financial loss $10,000 -
environment
$100,000
Minor damage to equipment
MINOR Restricted work injury /
Spill contained on board or vessel. Financial Loss
2 medical first aid cases
$5,000 - $ 10,000
Minor First aid injuries, e.g. Negligible damage to
NEGLIGIBLE
cuts / wounds / bruises / Inconsequential leak vessel. Financial Loss <
1
sprains $5000
Level of risk is evaluate based on the severity and likelihood as estimated by the RA process and categorize
their possible combinations to be High, Medium or Low risk within the Risk Matrix.
RISK ESTIMATOR
SEVERITY
NEGLIGIBLE MINOR MODERATE MAJOR EXTREME
LIKELIHOOD
1 2 3 4 5
VERY
UNLIKELY
1
UNLIKELY
2
LOW RISK
POSSIBLE
3
MEDIUM RISK
LIKELY
4
HIGH RISK
VERY LIKELY
5
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD RISK ASSESSMENT Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
3rd Edition : Jun 2010
FOR Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2014
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT CRITICAL OPERATIONS Approved by : Managing Director
MANUAL – PART II : RA-Navigation
APPENDIX 1 : Page 5
Once the risk level has been determined, the response can be defined. Higher risk levels require a greater
level of response.
Efforts should made to reduce risk, but the costs of prevention should be
Tolerable carefully measured and limited. Risk reduction measures should normally be
implemented within a defined period of time.
Work should not be started or continued until the risk level has been reduced
High
Intolerable and risk numbers enters the Yellow or the Green area, then the work must not
be started and work must remain prohibited. Contact office for guidance.
Once the harmful effects of a hazard are determined, controls/measures that may mitigate the effects of that
hazards and its consequences has to be taken into account.
During any operation, controls can be: procedural, human recourses, training, control systems, appropriate
design and construction, maintenance, communication, use of proper equipment, toolbox meetings, briefing,
etc.
The methods of reducing the risk level of a hazard can be put in one scale and balanced against efforts
needed in another. This effort may be represented by money or time or a combination of the two. If it can be
shown that there is a gross imbalance between the two, e.g. the reduction of risk level is insignificant
compared to the cost of implementing the solution, it will not be reasonably practicable to go ahead.
• Eliminate Hazards with intolerable risk at whatever cost. If this is not practicable abandoning the
operation should be considered.
• Reducing the risk of those in ALARP region if it is cost effective. Higher costs could be considered
acceptable if the risk is close to the intolerable region.
• Reducing the risk levels of those in the negligible region with minimal effort.
In many cases, positive action can result in the risk being tolerable. As an example, supervision by a
senior officer for hot work in ballast tank would result in the risk being acceptable provided other
controls measures are in place.
It is vitally important that control measures are implemented prior to proceeding with the job.
STEP 10: After work is completed, evaluate the risk assessment for any missed
hazard or new hazard.
Once the work is completed, the risk assessment should be evaluated. This is a self improvement process to
ensure that any lessons learnt are carried to the next risk assessment.
Risk assessment should not normally be carried out every time an operation/task takes place. The original
risk assessment can be reviewed instead of performing a new one, provided that nothing
has changed and the applicability of the existing procedures is ensured. However the risk assessment should
be carried out if there changes in materials, equipment, operations/procedures, etc.
The same risk assessment can be reviewed used upto 5 times within a one month period. For the sixth
operation or the operation being conducted after one month’s period, a new risk assessment is to be
completed.
Following the selection of the appropriate control measures, the Risk ranking process should be repeated in
order to evaluate if the risk is reduced to a lower Category e.g. from High risk to medium risk or low risk. In
case of medium risk, additional control measures would be required to ensure that the risks are acceptable.
Additional Notes
The risk assessment process never stops because the system will make use of previous experience, new
measures will be based on improved measures and so on.
The risk assessments records should be filed and organized on board in order to be easily retrievable and
shown to auditors and inspectors. Electronic copies are acceptable.
Important
1. The contents of this section would be amended as required. More risk assessment would be added
based on the review of the SMS system, if required.
2. For critical jobs for which the company has carried out a Risk assessment, the department head to
review the risks and their control measures. They can also include any addition risks or control
measures. The risk and the control measures may be of a general nature or specific to their ship.
Prepared by : MSQR
WALLEM Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD RISK ASSESSMENT Revised by : Director (Marine)
3rd Edition : 31.1.06
FOR Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2016
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT CRITICAL OPERATIONS Approved by : Directors
MANUAL – PART II APPENDIX 1 : RA-Navigation
Index : Page 1
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 DO JOB
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS ‐ NAVIGATION WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : HELICOPTER OPERATION If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 12‐Jan‐14 Last Assessment: 12‐Jan‐14 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Danger of Fire / Explosion Damage to Ship / Equipment Shipboard Safety checklist from Guide to
1 5 5 HR helicopter/ship operations to be followed 1 5 MR YES
correctly
Danger of Static discharge Damage to Ship / Equipment Ship crew to allow the line from the Helicopter
2 3 5 HR to come in contact with deck prior to handling 1 5 MR YES
line.
Injury to ships crew or pilot/helicopter crew Injury to Personnel All safety precautions as per shipboard safety
checklist from Guide to helicopter/ship
3 4 5 HR operations to be followed correctly
1 5 MR YES
Damage to ship structure & helicopter Damage to Ship / Equipment All safety precautions as per shipboard safety
checklist from Guide to helicopter/ship
4 4 4 HR operations to be followed correctly 1 4 LR NO
Communication failure Damage to Ship / Equipment Test communication with Pilot prior helicopter
operation. Discuss contingency plan & backup
5 2 4 MR communication in case of main communication 1 4 LR NO
failure.
Danger of Operating in rough weather , strong wind & heavy Damage to Ship / Equipment All safety precautions as per shipboard safety
spray / sea on deck checklist from Guide to helicopter/ship
6 2 4 MR operations to be followed correctly 1 4 LR NO
Dangers of surface ventilation , High pressure in cargo tanks Damage to Ship / Equipment All safety precautions as per shipboard safety
& vapour emission on deck . checklist from Guide to helicopter/ship
7 2 4 MR operations to be followed correctly
1 4 LR NO
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Checklist to be filled diligently ‐ positive verification Acceptable Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
To be discussed in toolbox meeting prior to the Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
2 Acceptable
operation
To be discussed in toolbox meeting prior to the Date and time when all controls are in place
3 Acceptable
operation
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS ‐ NAVIGATION WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : NAVIGATION IN ICE If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Ice damage to vessel and its equipments Damage to Ship / Equipment Proper passage plan incorporating latest ice
1 4 5 HR data & contingencies 1 5 MR YES
Getting struck/trapped in Ice Damage to Ship / Equipment Keep moving. Never stop. Always maintain
2 4 5 HR momentum.
1 5 MR YES
Hazard to crew from freezing temperature Injury to Personnel Accommodation heating systems in good
3 4 4 HR working order.
1 4 LR NO
Frost bite / injury to lookout and crew due to slips. Injury to Personnel Good winter PPE and walkways kept clear of
4 3 5 HR Ice
1 5 MR YES
Radar scanner stuck Damage to Ship / Equipment To be kept always turning.
5 2 4 MR 1 4 LR NO
Loosing stability due heavy ice accretion on deck from Damage to Ship / Equipment Alter course to avoid ice accretion. Ensure
headwinds adequate stability considering additional weight
6 3 5 HR of ice on exposed areas at the onset of voyage. 1 5 MR YES
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
Additional & effective lookout by all available means. Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
Safe speed . Latest weather monitored & ice reports
1 Acceptable
plotted. Bridge watch level 2.
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
Frequent rotation of crew on exposed areas to allow Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
warming up inside accommodation.
4 Acceptable
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
Reduce speed in strong winds to reduce ice accretions. Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
Consider altering course to avoid beam wind in order to be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
6 Acceptable
reduce ice accretion.
7
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS ‐ NAVIGATION WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : NAVIGATION IN PIRACY BLACK SPOTS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Hijacking Damage to Vessel, Crew, Claim Comply latest version of best management
to Owner practices to deter piracy. If in GoA or somalia
basin or west Africa HRA, use citadel space
1 5 5 HR and call coalition warship. Do not panic and do 2 5 MR YES
not confront/contradict pirates.
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
All important contact no.to be posted near sat phone. If Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
in GoA, use irridium phone to call UKMTO & portable
1 Acceptable
VHF radio to call coalition warship from citadel space.
Duty Officer to be aware of by‐pass programme. Master
and CE to ensure same. To inform Duty Engineer if time
5 Acceptable
and situation permits.
Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS ‐ NAVIGATION WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : PERSONNEL TRANSFER AT SEA (Anchor or at Underway) If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Gangway, Combination Ladder, pilot ladder not safely rigged Injury to Personnel Ensure the Gangway, Combination ladder/pilot
for personnel transfer ladder is rigged safely under supervision of a
1 3 5 HR responsible Officer.
1 5 MR YES
Environmental Condition not favorable for safe transfer Injury to Personnel Check the direction of the wind, sea/swell and
2 4 5 HR provide adequate lee 1 5 MR YES
Personnel Deployed for safe transfer not sufficient Injury to Personnel Ensure adequate personnel are provided for
3 3 5 HR the transfer 1 5 MR YES
Vessel Rolling/Pitching Injury to Personnel Vessel to maintain a heading ensuring
4 3 5 HR minimum vessel movements 1 5 MR YES
The personnel deployed to be well briefed of transfer Date and time when all controls are in place
3 procedure, wait untill sufficient man power is available. Acceptable
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS ‐ NAVIGATION WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : TRYING OUT MAIN ENGINE AT BERTH ( INCLUDING SBM/BOUYS) If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Propeller getting damaged by fouling Damage to Equipment Person to visually check propeller is clear
1 3 4 MR 1 4 LR NO
Damage to small crafts close to propeller Damage to Equipment / Other Person to visually check propeller is clear
2 Crafts
3 4 MR 1 4 LR NO
Ship surging at berth Damage to Equipment Moorings to be tight and should be monitored
3 4 4 HR during the period.
1 4 LR NO
Damage to shore equipment i.e.. chicksan/ hoses for tanker Damage to Equipment Moorings to be tight and should be monitored
and loaders/cranes for other ships during the period. For Bulk Cargo vessels the
Shore loader must be clear from the vessel,
Hatch covers preferably closed or atleast drawn
closer inside from the railings & No
4 3 5 HR overhanging of any ship's equipment.
1 5 MR YES
Chicksans/hoses to be disconnected and clear
from railings on tankers.
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
Liason and proper communication with shore personnel Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
6 Acceptable
be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
7
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : M.V./M.T. WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area :
Work Activity being assessed : SAFE NAVIGATION WITH ECDIS AS PRIMARY MEANS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 28‐Feb‐14 Last Assessment: 30‐Jun‐12 Current : 28‐Feb‐14 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
HARDWARE FAILURE OF ECDIS. HAZARD TO SAFE HARDWARE TYPE APPROVED &LOCATED
NAVIGATION. IN A PROTECTED POSITION.EQUIPMENT
1 4 4 HR UNDER PLANNED MAINTENANCE SYSTEM 3 3 MR YES
& SHORE BASED MAINTENANCE.
POWER DISRUPTION ALARM PROVIDED. GENERATOR(S) Date and time when all controls are in place
3 PROVIDE DOUBLE REDUNDANCY Acceptable
ALL SOFTWARE SCANNED FOR VIRUS PRIOR
INSTALLATION. NO OTHER SOFTWARE/NETWORK USED
5 Acceptable
IN/WITH SYSTEM.
Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
ECDIS TRAINING PROVIDED BY WALLEM TRAINING Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
CENTERS. ONBOARD FAMILIARISATION CONDUCTED be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
6 Acceptable
FOR ALL NEW JOINING OPERATORS.
CHECK PROGRAM IS RUN AFTER INSTALLATION OF
7 CORRECTIONS TO ENSURE CORRECTION COMPATABILTY Acceptable
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Prepared by : MSQR
WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Checked by : Director (Marine)
FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
CRITICAL OPERATIONS Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2016
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT Approved by : Directors
MANUAL – PART II APPENDIX 1 : RA D&C Forms
Index : Page 1
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
If there is a loss of stability at any stage, corrective Date and time when all controls are in place
3 action to be taken to restore stability and operations Acceptable
suspended
Weather reports to be obtained and original condition Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4 restored prior to arrival of bad wx. Acceptable
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : BRAKE HOLDING CAPACITY TESTING FOR MOORING WINCHES If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Correct tools / equipment not used Damage to Equipment, Injury to Use correct Testing tools - correct type
Personnel connecting arms, Rated correct Hydraulic Jack,
1 3 5 HR Proper connecting hoses for hydrailic jack
1 5 MR YES
Deck deformation due to point loading Damage to Equipment Check and ensure that the force applied via the
2 3 5 HR hydraulic jack does not exceed the permissible 1 5 MR YES
load limit.
Weather and Sea Conditions Damage to Equipment, Injury to Weather forecast to be checked, if likely to
3 Personnel 3 3 MR deteriorate, Testing of winches to postpone 2 3 LR NO
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : COMBINATION LADDER ‐ RIGGING AND HOISTING/SECURING ( in If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Fall due defective pilot ladder Injury to Personnel Pilot ladder including the ropes should be
thoroughly inspected. Ensure the steps are
1 2 4 MR clean and free of oil & not Painted.
1 4 LR NO
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
If navigational situation does not permit deck lights, Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4 sufficient hand torches to be used for safe operations Acceptable
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : ENCLOSED SPACE ENTRY If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Dangers from lack of oxygen and presence of toxic gas Injury to Personnel Enclosed space entry checklist from Safety
1 4 5 HR manual to be used 1 5 MR YES
Trips and falls ‐ based on location Injury to Personnel Proper PPE and Tool box meeting prior Job
2 3 4 MR activity.
1 4 LR NO
3 Object falling from aloft / above Injury to Personnel 3 4 MR Toolbox meeting for support staff 1 4 LR NO
Weather and sea hazard Injury to Personnel Enclosed space entry to be carried out only in
4 4 4 HR fair Wx condition 2 4 MR YES
Incorrect use of Gas instrument Injury to Personnel Gas instrument check to be only carried out by
C/Officer or a crew member trained in using
5 4 4 HR gas instrument (on board training by C/O)
1 4 LR NO
Flooding of tank ‐ Ballast tank Injury to Personnel All valves to the tank to be isolated and valve
system to be locked out. Isolation Permit and
8 2 4 MR LO-TO System to be complied with. 1 4 LR NO
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
Gas Instrument to be calibrated prior use as per Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 Acceptable
instructions in the manual
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
Additional precautions like fall preventer to be used for Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4 entry in moderate wx condition. Acceptable
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : GANGWAY AND MOT LADDER ‐ RIGGING AND HOISTING If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Fall and slip hazard due condition of gangway Injury to Personnel Gangway to be inspected and maintained as
per SMMS. Gangway to be inspected prior
1 3 4 MR rigging and steps kept clean.
1 4 LR NO
Injury due weather and sea condition Damage to Equipment Suitable lee to be provided for the crew working
3 4 3 MR at site, if applicable 1 3 LR NO
4 Personal injury due poor illumination Injury to Personnel 3 5 HR Sufficient illumination to be provided 1 5 MR YES
Damage to gangway due lashings that have not been Damage to Equipment Proper check to be done to ensure that all
5 removed
3 3 MR lashings are remove 1 3 LR NO
Fall hazard when rigging/ removing stanchions and safety Injury to Personnel Fall arrestor to be used with safety harness and
6 lines on the gangway
5 5 HR work vest (if applicable) 1 5 MR YES
Fall hazard when connecting/disconnecting pilot ladder to Injury to Personnel Fall arrestor to be used with safety harness and
7 gangway
5 5 HR work vest (if applicable)
1 5 MR YES
Fall or slip due gangway slipping down or due uncontrolled Injury to Personnel Through inspection of the lowering mechanism
lowering including safety interlocks if applicable) and
8 2 4 MR maintenance as per SMMS
1 4 LR NO
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Fall Preventer Device to be used. Acceptable Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 Fall Preventer Device to be used. Acceptable be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : GREASING DECK CRANES ‐ POINT GREASING ( SHEAVES, ROLLERS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Injury due Improper tools / equipment Injury to Personnel Use correct tools - greasing guns, nipple type,
1 3 4 MR test pneumatic grease pumps before job (if 1 4 LR NO
APPLICABLE)
Injury due Weather and Sea Conditions Injury to Personnel / Damage to Weather forecast to be checked, if likely to
2 Equipment 4 4 HR deteriorate, greasing to be postpone 1 4 LR NO
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : GREASING OF WINDLASS AND MOORING WINCHES If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Correct tools / equipment not used Damage to Equipment, Injury to Use correct tools - greasing guns, nipple type,
1 Personnel 4 4 HR test pneumatic grease pumps before job 1 4 LR NO
Job allocation ‐ personnel's involved, familiarity Injury to Personnel Competent person to carry out the job who has
6 3 4 MR done it before, else training to be given. 1 4 LR NO
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : HOT WORK If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Fire and explosion hazard due to hot work Injury to Personnel, Damage to Specific Hot work checklist from Safety Manual
1 Property and Enviournment 5 4 HR to be complied with strictly 1 4 LR NO
Trips and falls ‐ based on location Injury to Personnel Proper PPE and Tool box meeting prior Job
2 4 4 HR activity. 1 4 LR NO
Asphyxiation ‐ based on location Injury to Personnel Well ventilated area outside accommodation
3 4 4 HR and gas meters used at timely intervals 1 4 LR NO
Personal burn injury during hot work Injury to Personnel Trained welder and tool box meeting before job
4 4 4 HR 1 4 LR NO
Faulty equipment (leaking torches, hoses, cables etc) Fire and electrocution hazards All equipment to be thoroughly checked before
putting into use. Welding cables to be
5 4 4 HR inspected and connecters ensured to be fault- 1 4 LR NO
free.
Sparking due to improper earthing of the welding return Fire/Explosion All welding must be undertaken only with return
cable. cable connected directly to work-piece.
6 4 4 HR 1 4 LR NO
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 DO JOB
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : LOWERING LIFEBOAT If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Damage to lifeboat / injury to crew due Weather & sea Injury to Personnel / Damage to Lifeboat to be only lowered in calm sea
1 condition Equipment
4 4 HR conditions. 1 4 LR NO
Failure in lowering and hoisting of boat or Hook premature Injury to Personnel / Damage to Maintenance and inspection as per SMMS.
release/failure/seizure Equipment Equipment to be serviced as per approved
service agent. Inspection prior lowering. Crew
2 3 5 HR to be trained on the operation of the specific
1 5 MR YES
hook in use
FPD (Fall preventer device) to be used until lifeboat is 1 Date and time when all controls are in place
3 meter above water and should be fitted back when Acceptable
launching
Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4
Launching procedure should be posted at site
5 Acceptable
Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
Gripes should be cleared from the boat after they are Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
6 released. Coir Fenders to rig on the fashion plate Acceptable be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
7
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : LIFEBOAT WEEKLY AND MONTHLY MOVEMENT If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Weather & sea condition Damage to Equipment Must not be lowered if there is swell & wind
1 4 3 MR force above 4. 2 3 LR NO
Damage to lifeboat as vessel is making way( if brakes fail and Damage to Equipment Maintenance strops to be connected prior to
boat goes all the way down). releasing the lashing of the boat. Strops to be
2 4 4 HR removed once boat is lashed after the work
1 4 LR NO
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
Date and time when all controls are in place
3
Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : MOORING AND UNMOORING OPERATIONS ‐ BERTH If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Contact damage to vessel or jetty during mooring / Damage to Equipment Berthing checklist as per Sec 3.5 of BPM used
unmooring due to speed of approach to jetty and discuss the plan with the pilot. Sufficient
1 3 5 HR tugs should be available for the operation
1 5 MR YES
Mooring machinery not working or gear not in good Damage to Equipment All machinery to be checked and tried out prior
5 condition 2 4 MR commencement of operations. All gears to be 1 4 LR NO
checked
Communication failure Damage to Equipment Minimum of 2 walkie talkie at each location and
the communication systems to be checked.
Closed loop communications to be used. When
addressing stations on radio, ship's name to be
used as a prefix to avoid confusion with other
vessels. Duty officers manning stations to
discuss mooring plan using drawings on bridge
6 3 4 MR with Master & Pilot before proceeding to 1 4 LR NO
stations. Same to be re-discussed with all
hands when holding a tool-box meeting.
For Hydraulic winches oil leakages due to line fracture Damage to Equipment and Ensure all sccuppers are plugged prior starting
Enviornment winches and inspection/testing of hydraylic
8 3 4 MR lines regularly to ensure wasted/weak section 1 4 LR NO
are renewed
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
Snap back zones to be discussed during toolbox Date and time when all controls are in place
meetings. If space permits, they should be marked on
deck. Tug line to be inspected and should be in good
3 Acceptable
condition. Crew member to keep clear of snap back
zones.
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
Mooring operation to be suspended in case of bad be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
7 Acceptable
weather
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : PERSONNEL TRANSFER BASKET If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Poor crane performance, crane failure, wires, blocks, hooks, Injury to Personnel Rigorous inspection and testing to ensure that
1 hydraulics, brakes. 3 5 HR the equipment is in good order by following 1 5 MR YES
SMMS schedules.
Inability of ship to remain in position and sudden movement Injury to Personnel Check and ensure that the relative position of
of other ship the ship is maintained and no sudden
2 3 3 MR movement is given during transfers.
2 3 LR NO
Personnel Injury due to ergonomic condition including sea, Injury to Personnel Transfer operation to take place only with wind
swell visibility due to rain or squall, basket lands heavily on speed less than 25 knots, combined sea/swell
deck or due pendulum movement of the basket height less than 3 metres, visibility more than
300 metres. The basket should be equipped
with cushion material to reduce jarring when
3 3 5 HR landed. breifing to be done to persons using the
1 5 MR YES
basket if they are not regular users of the
basket.
Injury due to not wearing the appropriate clothing and/or life‐ Injury to Personnel To Ensure proper PPE and a life vest is worn
4 saving appliances 3 4 MR while riding a basket. Do not allow transfer 1 4 LR NO
without a life vest.
Job allocation ‐ personnel's involved, familiarity insufficient or Injury to Personnel Competent person to operate the crane, else
inexperienced or untrained crane operator. training to be given. The crane driver should be
5 2 4 MR trained and have a clear view of operations
1 4 LR NO
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : PILOT LADDER ‐ RIGGING AND HOISTING/SECURING If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Fall due defective pilot ladder Injury to Personnel Pilot ladder including the ropes should be
thoroughly inspected. Ensure the steps are
1 2 4 MR clean and free of oil & not Painted.
1 4 LR NO
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
Sufficient crew to be available for picking up the ladder Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
2 Acceptable
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
If navigational situation does not permit deck lights, Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4 sufficient hand torches to be used for safe operations Acceptable
Notice or stencil to be put on location that the stowage
5 should be carried out by atleast two persons. Acceptable
Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : RENEWING CRANE WIRE / CHANGING CRANE WIRE If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Injury due Improper tools / equipment Injury to Personnel Use correct tools - greasing guns, nipple type,
1 4 4 HR test pneumatic grease pumps before job (if 1 4 LR NO
APPLICABLE)
Injury due Weather and Sea Conditions Injury to Personnel / Damage to Weather forecast to be checked, if likely to
2 Equipment 4 3 MR deteriorate, greasing to be postpone 2 3 LR NO
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : SINGLE POINT / BOUY MOORING If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 28‐Feb‐13
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Personal injury to mooring crew Injury to Personnel Toolbox meeting to be held prior start of
1 3 4 MR operation. All mooring crew to have suitable 1 4 LR NO
PPE
Trips and falls in the work area Injury to Personnel Mooring area inspected and Clutter free. All
2 3 4 MR unwanted loose gear removed. 1 4 LR NO
Mooring machinery not working or gear not in good Damage to Property All machinery to be checked and tried out prior
6 condition 2 4 MR commencement of operations. All gears to be 1 4 LR NO
checked
Damage to bouy during operation caused by wind or tide Damage to Property, Damage to Weather condition (tide, wind etc.) should be
effect on the vessel Enviornment discussed with pilot and suitable
7 2 4 MR countermeasure taken ( extra tug, waiting etc)
1 4 LR NO
Communication failure Damage to Property, Damage to Minimum of 2 walkie talkie at each location and
8 Enviornment 2 4 MR the communication systems to be checked. 1 4 LR NO
Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : MV/MT WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area :
Work Activity being assessed : Inspection on deck during bad weather If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 03‐Mar‐14 Last Assessment: 03‐Mar‐14 Current : Last :
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Vessel rolling/pitching heavily ttip/slip/fall injuries. Loose objects Vessel to take all heavy weather precautions
can cause injuries/ damage to and comply with the checklists available in the
property Bridge Procedures Manual and the type specific
manual. If the vessel is rolling/pitching heavily,
vessel to adjust course and speed to minimise
1 5 4 HR the effect of adverse weather conditions, if 2 4 MR YES
necessary reduce the speed to minimum and
hove to.
Shipping Seas/ Heavy Sprays Result is severe injuries due Vessel to adjust course and speed to minimise
waves/ shipping seas, can result shipping seas/ Heavy sprays, it is recommended
2 in personnel going overboard. 4 5 HR to adjust the course and keep the sea/swell on 2 4 MR YES
quarter.
Loose /Unsecured objects/Inadequate strength of lashings for Result is severe injuries & Ensure all objects/spare parts/cargo units and
the deck cargo/vessel's equipment damage to vessel/cargo equipment is well secured using wire ropes and
bottle scre arrangements. Atleast two
independent lashings to be taken to ensure
failure of one lashing shall not result in
4 4 4 HR shifting/moving of heavy objects. Cargo vessels 1 5 MR YES
to strictly comply with cargo securing manual -
the adequacy of lashings to be checked/verified
orior departure port.
Poor Communication This can result in failure to The person leading the team and the back up
comply with established person to carry walkie talkies and establish
procedures/seamanship & thus closed loop communication with bridge. Notices
5 result in accident/injuries 3 4 MR and announcements to be made prohibiting 1 4 LR NO
personnel to go on deck during bad weather
conditions.
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
The ship staff to use the Fore and after centerline safe Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
walkway and make use of lifelines, lifejackets, adeqate
PPE. The OOW to monitor and supervise the personnel
1 and maintain effective communication throughout Acceptable
during the time period on new course.
Prior proceeeding for the inspection a detailed tool box Date and time when all controls are in place
meeting to be carried out and staff explained in details
3 of the hazards and precautions necessary by a Acceptable
responsible officer
Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : MV/MT WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area :
Work Activity being assessed : Operating CABA compressor for charging BA bottles If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 12‐May‐14 Last Assessment: 12‐May‐14 Current : Last :
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Unfamiliar with CABA compressor operation Injury to personnel, Damage to BA compressor to be used as per Maker's
the BA Compressor instructions under supervision of responsible
officer. Operating instructions to be posted
conspicuously adjacent to the BA compressor.
1 4 4 HR Ship staff to be trained/familiaried with CABA 1 4 LR NO
compressor during on board training/drill
sessions
Poor Quality of Air health hazard for personnel a long hose of suitable size to be provided at
donning BA sets the suction side of the compressor and air is
drawn from open atmosphere (not from the
room where the CABA compressor is installed.
4 3 4 MR The filters to be regularly cleaned/changed as
2 4 MR YES
per Maker's manual.
Only BA bottles to be charged with CABA compressor Injury/Explosion Hazard, if wrong SCBA Bottles to be color coded, Oxygen bottles
8 cylinderis charged 3 4 MR to have different colour coding 2 4 MR YES
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
Caba Compressor Air quality test to be done annualy Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4 Acceptable
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
The ship staff to be familiar with the color code of the Comments :
8 Acceptable
BA bottle Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : MT/MV WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : Deck
Work Activity being assessed : High Pressure Hydro‐blasting operation If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 31‐May‐14 Last Assessment: 31‐May‐14 Current : Last :
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Untrained personnel using the Hydroblaster. Serious injury All crew trained on the use of the Hydroblaster
1 2 4 MR by following the specific guidelines given in the 1 4 LR NO
Manual.
Recoil of the lance when using the Hydroblaster Serious injury The minimum lance length to be more than 1
2 3 4 MR mtr so as to not have a strong recoil. 1 4 LR NO
Improper PPE Serious injury All the involved personnel to have full PPE as
supplied with the Hydroblaster, which includes,
Heavy duty water proof suit, Reinforced shoes,
3 2 4 MR Safety helmet, Safety Visor, Safety Goggles &
1 4 LR NO
gloves.
Fatigue due to lengthy duration of operating the Serious injury. 2 persons should be ready with all the safety
Hydroblaster. gear to change hands between them every 15-
6 3 4 MR 20 minutes of operation .
1 4 LR NO
Over‐pressurisation Serious injury/ Damage to Check the operation of the Dump back
equipment arrangement, when the trigger is released after
the operation the dump back system should
7 2 4 MR dump the pressure to the water tank releasing
1 4 LR NO
the line pressure.
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 DO JOB
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place 08‐May‐2014 / 0800 LT
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : All items in the Safety manual Review dates Rank
9 Checklist 19.8 to be complied with and office 1
approcal obtained for hydro blasting operation 2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
RISK ASSESSMENT
Damage to ship due to Improper vent procedure Damage to Equipment Hold vent should be open prior to any ballasting
3 3 5 HR or deballasting operation. 1 5 MR YES
Sloshing damage due to rolling and pitching of vessel Damage to Equipment Alter course to ensure that rolling and pitching is
4 3 5 HR absolutely minimal.
2 5 MR YES
Suction loss during deballasting due to lack of water head Damage to equipment Control of discharge of ballast by throttling of
5 3 5 HR required valves as per water level 1 5 MR YES
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
Vessel to carry out ops at anchor or drifting off port limits Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 if weather condition is not favorable at Sea for Acceptable
ballast/deballast.
Office Approval (Fleet Cell/ Technical or Marine Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
department ) to be obtained prior to commencement of
2 Acceptable
cargo hold ballasting/deballasting.
Posting of notice in the ballast control room regarding the Date and time when all controls are in place
3 ventilation procedure prior to ballasting and deballasting Acceptable
holds.
Keep hold ballast at least almost full and keep re‐filling Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4 during passage once content has reduced. Acceptable
Duty officer and engineer to be in close communication to
check and advise water level and engine room to check
5 Acceptable
suction pressure to regulate the valves.
Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to be Yes No
7 considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : BULK CARRIER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : CARGO HOLD CLEANING If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Weather condition Injury to Personnel Monitor weather condition , Stop cleaning
1 4 5 HR operations in deteriorating weather or if bad 2 5 MR YES
weather is forecast
Danger of fall if crew stand on hatch coming track way and Injury to Personnel No crew are allowed to stand on hatch coming
2 fall down to cargo holds
3 5 HR for cargo residues removal.
1 5 MR YES
Impact injury from cleaning equipment (Fire hose , combi‐ Injury to Personnel Proper training of operation of High Pressure
gun, high pressure washing machine Equipment . At least 3 persons using the
equipment. Overviewing by responsible person.
3 4 5 HR No crew are allowed to stand on hatch coming 1 5 MR YES
for cargo residues removal.
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : BULK CARRIER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : LIGHTERING FROM BARGES If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Dragging Anchor ‐ collide with other vessel at anchor or Damage to Equipment and Good anchor watch maintained as per BPM.
1 running aground Enviornment
3 5 HR Checklist followed. 1 5 MR YES
Poor approach by barge leading to contact damage Damage to Equipment and Barge to be monitored as she comes alongside
2 Enviornment 4 5 HR and a parallel approach to be made by the 2 5 MR YES
barge
Movement of barge when alongside and contact damage Damage to Equipment and Barges should be properly fendered.
3 Enviornment
4 4 HR 2 4 MR YES
Movement of barge due to deteriorate weather condition Damage to Equipment and Weather forecast to be monitored and
4 Enviornment 4 5 HR operations suspended when weather 2 5 MR YES
deteriorates
5
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
Chain checked periodically for strain and lead. Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 Acceptable
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : BULK CARRIER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : LOADING MINERAL CONCENTRATES If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Shifting of Cargo due to liquefaction which can lead to Loss of Life, Property and Cargo moisture content should not exceed
capsizing damage to enviornment TML. Shipper has to submit certificate stating
1 3 5 HR TML and cargo moisture content prior to start 1 5 MR YES
of loading.
loading from open barges in rainy conditions Damage to Property Reject cargo from any open barges which are
4 2 4 MR not covered during rain. 1 4 LR NO
During loading , Cargo splattered onto bulkheads, slopping Damage to Property Stop loading , check moisture content of
lower side plating and shell plating portions of the cargo already loaded /being
5 3 3 MR loaded. If above TML, inform office 1 3 LR NO
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
Test for moisture content should have been within last Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 7 days prior to loading. Carry out can test as per BC code Acceptable
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : BULK CARRIER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : LOADING STEEL CARGO If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Damage to cargo due poor condition of cargo hold prior to Damage to Cargo Cargo holds to be prepared to Grain standard.
1 loading 3 5 HR Hold should be clean and dry. Hold to be rinsed 1 5 MR YES
with fresh water.
Hatch cover leakage Damage to Cargo Pre-loading , watertight test by hose or
ultrasonic and repair if leakage found. Hatch
2 4 5 HR cover maintenance as per SMMS
1 5 MR YES
Damage to cargo and ship structure due to poor Stowage Damage to Cargo Hold strong points to be marked on tank top &
dunnage to be properly positioned during
3 4 4 HR loading, Avoid stowage in space without parallel 1 4 LR NO
side.
Hazards of coils to ship structure Damage to Equipment stowed across ship with their axis for and aft
.stout Dunnage ,Wedge for each coils on the
5 4 4 HR bottom, key coils to be used for tighten the stow 1 4 LR NO
Personal injury from loaded steel product Injury to Personnel Crew should not stand in the fall or swing zone
6 4 5 HR of lifted steel 1 5 MR YES
Pre existing damage or poor condition of cargo Cargo Claims P & I surveyor attending. Mate's receipt to be
7 4 4 HR caused
1 4 LR NO
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
Carry out silver nitrate test on sections of hold. Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 Acceptable
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : BULK CARRIER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : OPENING / CLOSING HATCH COVERS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Damage to hatch cover when opening Damage to Equipment Visual check all cleats to ensure they are
unsecured by at least by 2 persons. No
1 3 4 MR obstruction in the path of the hatch cover
1 4 LR NO
wheels
Damage to hatch cover when closing Damage to Equipment Visual check all cleats to ensure they are
unsecured by at least by 2 persons. No
2 3 4 MR obstruction in the path of the hatch cover
1 4 LR NO
wheels
Damage from improper securing in open or closed position Damage to Equipment Proper procedures for securing the hatch cover
3 3 4 MR as stipulated by the manufacturer is to be 1 4 LR NO
followed.
Damage due to poor communication Damage to Equipment Good visual communication with at least two
4 2 4 MR person assigned for the job.
1 4 LR NO
Entanglement of body part from the running wheel of the Injury to Personnel Body of person monitoring closure to be well
5 hatch cover
2 4 MR clear of the track way.
1 4 LR NO
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 DO JOB
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
RISK ASSESSMENT
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
Toxic gas procedures to be followed from Safety manual Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4 and tanker manual to be followed. Acceptable
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT
Name of Vessel : Tanker Work area : Deck
Work Activity being assessed : Crude Oil Washing If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 16‐Jan‐16 Last Assessment: 06‐Dec‐15 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Failure to comply with requirements of COW Checklist Personal casulaty, Damage to COW Checklist should be complied with
Environment & damage to vessel diligently
1 4 5 HR 1 5 MR YES
Release of toxic vapours Risk to personal, damage to All operations to be carried out in closed mode.
3 envoirnment and fines 3 4 MR Crew to muster at safe area inside 1 4 LR NO
Accommodation and comply with company's
Carry over of oil sheen or spill by rainwater at time of heavy Damage to Environment Work Practice on Scupper control procedure to
4 rain 5 5 HR be followed 1 5 MR YES
7 3 4 MR 1 4 LR NO
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
Operation to be suspended if rain is very heavy and Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4 Acceptable
unable to control flow of rain water over fish plate
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
6
be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
7
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
C/O 3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : PETROLEUM TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : TANK CLEANING If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 7‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Safety & Pollution hazard from improper procedure for tank Damage to Enviornment, Procedures from ICS Tanker Safety Guide and
1 cleaning Property, Injury to Personnel 3 4 MR TOM to be strictly followed 1 4 LR NO
S & P Hazard from Pressurized COW Lines Damage to Enviornment, Pressure test COW Lines prior operation and
2 Property
2 4 MR check/verify the integrity. 1 4 LR NO
S & P Hazard from loose Scuppers Damage to Enviornment, All scupper plugs to be checked and ensure
3 Property
2 4 MR correct sealing. 1 4 LR NO
S & P Hazard from oxygen rich atmosphere in Cargo Space Injury to Personnel, Damage to IG to be running continiously and the
during operation. Enviornment, Property atmosphere of tanks to be washed to be
checked for the required concentrations prior
4 2 4 MR operation and the oxygen content of the IG
1 4 LR NO
supplied to be monitored continiously.
6 1 1
7 1 1
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 DO JOB
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : DISCHARGING OPERATIONS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Over flow and release / damage to enviornment Damage to Enviornment Discharging as per prepared Discharging plan
1 4 4 HR (as per ISGOTT 22.6). Continuous monitoring 1 4 LR NO
of cargo ullages & surrounding waters.
Pipeline failure and spill into Enviornment Damage to Enviornment Pressure in the lines to be increased slowly.
Lines to be tested as per company guidelines.
Cargo tanks to be monitored. Scuppers to be
2 3 5 HR kept plugged and should be watertight.
1 5 MR YES
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : GAS FREEING & INERTING / GASSING UP If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Dangers from remnants of previous cargo ‐ Liquids Risk to Personnel Crude oil tankers to inert under inert condition.
Product tankers and chemical tankers to wash
1 4 4 HR as per guidelines in ISGOTT/ Chemical tanker 1 4 LR NO
guide.
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
Hydrocarbon content to be brought below 2% prior Date and time when all controls are in place
3 commencement of gas freeing by air Acceptable
5
Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Closed loop communication to be followed. Acceptable Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
Constantly monitoring of Oxygen in tank, monitoring IG. be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
7 Acceptable
O2
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : LINING UP CARGO SYSTEM If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Damage to Pipeline and pumps due to pressure surge caused Damage to Property and Vessel to open valves so as to ensure that
by wrong sequence of valve operations Enviornment there is not pressure surge when loaded or
1 4 4 HR partially loaded. ( as per plan)
1 4 LR NO
Damage to Pipeline as tank valve not open on start of loading Damage to Property and Correct line up and tank valve should be open.
2 Enviornment
3 4 MR 1 4 LR NO
Damage to pipeline due to correct valve not being open Damage to Property and The line up should be verified by another officer
3 Enviornment
4 4 HR prior to start of loading 1 4 LR NO
Contamination of cargo due to opening of wrong tank valve Damage to Cargo Valves of tanks with a different cargo should be
4 3 3 MR tagged and marked to prevent inadvertent 1 3 LR NO
operation.
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 DO JOB
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : LOADING OPERATIONS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 18‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Over flow and release / damage to enviornment Damage to Enviornment Loading as per prepared loading plan.
1 4 4 HR Continuous monitoring of cargo ullages & 1 4 LR NO
surrounding waters.
Pipeline failure and spill into Enviornment Damage to Enviornment Loading rate to be increased slowly. Filling in
tanks to be monitored. Tank valve
opening/closing to be monitored to avoid
2 3 5 HR pressure surge. Scuppers to be kept plugged
1 5 MR YES
and should be watertight.
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : OPENING SEA CHEST FOR BALLASTING If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Pollution hazard when opening sea chest for taking dirty Damage to Enviornment All associated to be stripped thoroughly.
ballast. Suction line to be under negative suction.
1 4 4 HR Discharge valve to be opened under control
2 4 MR YES
4
5
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
Cargo pump must be running with negative pressure on Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 suction gauge prior to opening the sea chest valve. Acceptable
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : PRESSURE TESTING LINES AND SYSTEMS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 26‐May‐15 Last Assessment: 26‐May‐15 Current : 26‐May‐15 Last : 18‐Dec‐13
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Pollution risk due to line rupture. Damage to Enviornment and Anti pollution gear ready and all scuppers
1 Property
2 4 MR plugged. 1 4 LR NO
Damage to line or any of its components due to over Damage to Property Pressure testing should not exceed the design
2 pressurisation. 3 4 MR pressure of the pipeline or any of its 1 4 LR NO
components.
Danger from toxic gas to deck. Risk to Personnel When cargo with toxic vapours are being used
for test, staff checking the lines for leaks to
3 3 4 MR carry personal gas monitors.
2 4 MR YES
Damage to line or any of its components due to wrong Damage to Property In case of annual testing, where the lines are
procedure used for testing. tested to 100% of SOP/MAWP, use only COP
for both filling and testing to the required
pressure. Incase of 30M
pressure testing where the test pressure is 1.5
4 2 4 MR times the SOP/MAWP, Correct operation is to 1 4 LR NO
use stripping pump, not COP. Line to be filled
with COP and pressure to be built with stripping
pump.
5
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
Toolbox meeting to discuss the hazards associated with Date and time when all controls are in place
3 the cargo being used for testing. Acceptable
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : STS OPERATIONS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 28‐Feb‐13
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Contact between vessel due to weather and sea conditions Damage to Enviornment and STS checklists 1,2,3 & 5 and contingency
while making approach/casting off. Property checklist to be complied with. Recommended
Manoeuvres and approach speeds and
1 2 5 MR headings to be followed as per STS Transfer 1 5 MR YES
Guide and agreed with the mooring master.
Engine / steering failure during approach Damage to Enviornment and Engines and steering to be tested prior making
5 Property 2 5 MR approach. Bridge and E/Room manned to Level 1 5 MR YES
2
Hazards associated with cargo vapour pressure/ Toxic gases Risk to Personnel Information on the previous cargoes carried to
6 3 4 MR be sought and mitigation steps to be agreed. 2 4 MR YES
Failure of hydraulic system/winches. Damage to Enviornment and System to be tried out before use, Any
Property abnormalities to be reported and rectified prior
7 3 4 MR commencement of operation 2 4 MR YES
Abort STS operation if the risk of collision becomes Date and time when all controls are in place
3 Acceptable
persistant.
Back up radio with charged battery to be available. VHF Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
back up channel should be agreed as back up. If
4 required, additional personnel to be employed in order Acceptable
to comply with rest requirements.
Emergency abort procedure discussed in event of such
5 Acceptable
failure for both vessel. Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
Appropriate additional PPE to be worn, if requiired Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
6 Acceptable
be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
Use of Alternate winch to be considered as an option.
7 Acceptable
MASTER PRIOR APPROACH 2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : TOPPING UP CARGO TANK If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Cargo Overflow due poor monitoring Damage to Enviornment Overflow alarms. Topping up with MMC. All
tanks to be monitored every hour and more
1 2 4 MR frequently when closer to topping up ullage
1 4 LR NO
Cargo overflow due to failure of valve to close Damage to Enviornment Open reserve tank or tank which is not full while
problem with valve is sorted. If required, stop
2 3 4 MR loading. Hand pump to be kept ready.
1 4 LR NO
Danger from incorrect Job allocation ‐ personnel's involved, Damage to Enviornment Competent person to carry out the job who has
6 familiarity 3 3 MR done it before. New staff to be trained . 2 3 LR NO
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
Canister type masks to be used for the specific toxic Date and time when all controls are in place
3 Acceptable
when handling such gases.
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
Manifold pressure gauge to be monitored during
5 Acceptable
topping up. Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
Staffs to be aware to change over to UTI readings in be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
7 case of failure of remote gauging system Acceptable
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT
Name of Vessel : Tanker Work area : Deck
Work Activity being assessed : Water washing of cargo tanks If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 16‐Jan‐16 Last Assessment: 06‐Dec‐15 Current : 28‐Jan‐16 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Poor planning of the operation Personal casualty, Damage to Water washing plan to be prepared in standard
Environment & damage to vessel format and sent to office for approval
1 4 5 HR 1 5 MR YES
Safety violation during washing Personal casualty, Damage to The COW checklist is to be used for washing
Environment & damage to vessel and items which are not applicalbe to be maked
2 4 4 HR as N/A (Not applicable) 1 4 LR NO
Washing or re‐washing or stripping of gas free tanks may lead Personal casualty and explosion Slops must be inerted and intert gas must be
6 to increase in oxygen level in slop tank from educting the tank 4 5 HR operational/venting from slop tank when 1 5 MR YES
being washed educting the tanks being re-washed or stripped
Time pressure to complete the washing operation at the Personal casualty and explosion Discuss with Marine Superintendent to ensure
earliest may lead to errors that the washing and gas freeing is carried out
7 3 4 MR safely 1 4 LR NO
Unintentional introduction of O2 in to the cargo tank which is Personal casualty and explosion Prior changing to fresh air mode in IG Line, any
inerted as the IG line is used in fresh air mode tank which is inerted condition must be blanked
8 3 4 MR and the status of oxygen content is slop must be 1 4 LR NO
monitored perodically
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
Oxygen content in slop tank must be checked Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
6 Acceptable
perodically during washing and educting be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
7
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
C/O 3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
RISK ASSESSMENT
Danger from incorrect Job allocation ‐ personnel's involved, Injury to Personnel Competent person to carry out the job who has
6 familiarity 3 5 HR done it before. New staff to be trained . 1 5 MR YES
Commence to unbolt the flange only when sure the
7 pressure is zero and section isolated from system. Acceptable
Appropriate tools such as chain blocks etc. to be tested Comments :
8 Acceptable
prior works Review dates Rank
If dedicated person is not available, job is to be
9 Acceptable 1
postponed or cancelled
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : GAS TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : MAINTENANCE ON COMPRESSOR If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Danger from Correct tools / equipment not used / Correct Injury to Personnel Use correct tools - non spark instruments.
PPE not worn Avoid dropping down working instruments. New
valve rating correct and appropriate for Low
1 3 4 MR Temperature. Use of correct PPE, no loose or 1 4 LR NO
torn boiler suits, personal gas detection
equipment
Danger from incorrect Job allocation ‐ personnel's involved, Injury to Personnel Competent person to carry out the job who has
6 familiarity 3 5 HR done it before. New staff to be trained . 1 5 MR YES
Check before starting pipe disconnection for cold spots
7 in the bottom indicating liquid still remaining inside pipe Acceptable
Appropriate tools such as chain blocks etc. to be tested Comments :
8 Acceptable
prior works Review dates Rank
If dedicated person is not available, job is to be
9 Acceptable 1
postponed or cancelled
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : GAS TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : SAMPLING OF CARGO If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Risk to personnel due exposure to toxic vapours from cargo Injury to Personnel Close Loop method for sampling to be done.
1 which emit toxic vapours. 2 5 MR Personal gas meters in use on deck. 1 5 MR YES
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
Gloves goggles and necessary protective clothing to use Date and time when all controls are in place
3 Acceptable
if sampling cargo
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
RISK ASSESSMENT
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : CHEMICAL TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : TANK CLEANING If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Safety & Pollution hazard from improper procedure for tank Damage to Enviornment, Procedures from ICS Tanker Safety Guide
1 cleaning Property, Injury to Personnel 3 5 HR (Chemicals) to be strictly followed 1 5 MR YES
Corrosion hazard to crew and to the ships structure Injury to Personnel, Damage to Full chemical suit to be worn where required
5 Property 3 4 MR and proper procedures followed 1 4 LR NO
Exposure to toxic substances by tank entry Injury to Personnel Wearing a full chemical suit and SCBA [self-
contained breathing apparatus] where required
6 3 4 MR by ICS tanker safety guide 1 4 LR NO
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : CHEMICAL TANKER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : ULLAGING / SAMPLING OF CARGO If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Risk to personnel due exposure to toxic vapours from cargo Injury to Personnel Closed gauging / sampling to be done.
1 which emit toxic vapours. 3 5 HR Personal gas meters in use on deck. Closed 1 5 MR YES
UTI / MMC to be used
Static hazard from gauging equipment. Injury to Personnel Follow instructions from manufacturer including
2 3 4 MR any instructions on grounding the equipment 1 4 LR NO
5
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
SCBA to be used during ullaging/sampling if TLV‐TWA of Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
toxic gas is more than permissible limit. Crew to stay
1 Acceptable
upwind, wind sock to be hoisted on deck.
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
RISK ASSESSMENT
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
RISK ASSESSMENT
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : PCC WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : LOWERING / LIFTING OF PANELS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Panel damage as panel not being lifted or lowered evenly Damage to Equipment Lifter truck supports to be aligned properly on
the markings on deck. Vessel not to have
1 4 5 HR excessive list or trim.
1 5 MR YES
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : PCC WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : MAINTENANCE OF LEAKING PUSH CYLINDER If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Person falling down from rigged staging. Injury to Personnel Working aloft checklist from Safety Manual to
1 4 5 HR be followed. Safety harness to be used 1 5 MR YES
Injury to crew or damage to due Weather and sea conditions Injury to Personnel, Damage to Area to be cleaned and kept free of oil/ and
and location of the vessel Equipment grease. Responsible person to check area
2 4 5 HR cleanliness. Saw dust or absorbent pads used. 1 5 MR YES
Slipping and falling due to slippery area caused by oil and Injury to Personnel Area to be cleaned and kept free of oil/ and
grease. grease. Responsible person to check area
3 3 4 MR cleanliness. Saw dust or absorbent pads used. 1 4 LR NO
Injury or damage as correct tools/equipment not used. Injury to Personnel, Damage to Proper tools to be used. Check if the required
4 Proper spares available. Equipment 3 4 MR seals and other spares are available before 1 4 LR NO
carrying out the job
Injury or damage to vhicles due to tools dropping down Injury to Personnel, Damage to Tools to be tied to the box with sufficient rope
5 Equipment
3 5 HR to facilitate working
2 5 MR YES
Injury due to poor Job allocation and inexperience of the Injury to Personnel Experienced person to carry out job. New staff
crew assigned for the job. Lack of familairty with job to be familarised with the procedures prior
6 3 4 MR being assined this job.
1 4 LR NO
Spillage of hydraulic oil onto the vehicles and or into the Sea Damage to Cargo, Equipment, Hydraulic oil to the cylinder cut off. Containment
7 Enviornment 3 5 HR drum to be positioned below push cylinder. 2 5 MR YES
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
Supervision to be done at all time by senior officer. Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 Acceptable
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : PCC WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : OPENING / CLOSING OF GAS TIGHT SLIDING BULKHEAD DOORS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Damage to Flaps Damage to Equipment Flaps to be cleared off the channel prior
1 3 4 MR operation. 1 4 LR NO
Locks /wedges removed Damage to Equipment Correct operating procedure to be followed.
Visual check to confirm wedges closed/open
2 3 4 MR fully apart from indication lamps.
1 4 LR NO
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
New persons to be given on the job training to gain Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4 experience and familiarity with procedures and Acceptable
operation
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
Area to be cordoned off during the operation and no Comments :
8 personnel to stand inside the cordonned off area. Acceptable
Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : PCC WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : OPENING / CLOSING OF RAMPS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Ramp falling down Damage to Equipment Maintenance as per SMMS. Wires properly
lubricated & checked for damage. Condition of
1 4 5 HR brake bands of winches checked.
1 5 MR YES
Injury due to poor Job allocation and inexperience of the Injury to Personnel Experienced person to carry out job. New staff
crew assigned for the job. Lack of familiarity with the job. to be familarised with the procedures prior
5 4 5 HR being assigned this job. 1 5 MR YES
Damage to ramp hinges or to the nose of vehicles due to Damage to Equipment, Cargo Angle between ramp & jetty to be between 7 &
incorrect angle of ramp with jetty or Improper landing of the 13 degrees downwards. Insert wedges between
ramp on the pier , Ramp hitting the ship structure while main and sub flap for required angle. Reduce
securing. the hoisting speed at the final stages of
Securing. Never take weight on the Sub wire
8 3 4 MR once the Ramp is in almost vertical position. 1 4 LR NO
Visual checks during the operation and placing
of plywood sheets under the ramp before the
ramp touches the jetty.
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
New crew to be given on the job training to gain
5 experience and familiarity with procedures and Acceptable
operation Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
The person on the jetty to clear any others coming
9 below the ramp and instruct the operator accordingly. Acceptable 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : MV WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area :
Work Activity being assessed : Painting in car decks If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 31‐May‐14 Current : Last :
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Lack of Oxygen, presence of toxic and flammable gases Result in aphyxiation of The space to be well ventilated, checks for
personnel, fire hazard toxic, flammable gases and O2 content to be
1 4 4 HR done at regular intervals.
3 4 MR YES
Fire detectors in car deck getting covered with paint film Result in malfunction, failure of Painting to be done using paint rollers and paint
2 fire detectors 3 4 MR brushes only. Spray painting machine not to be 1 4 LR NO
used.
Slip/trip hazards due to wet paint. Result in injuries Appropriate notices to be posted, baricades
3 3 4 MR made to avoid personnel inadvertently walking 1 4 LR NO
on the wet paint.
Paint not drying up in time Damage to cargo during loading Minimum 7 days of window period to be
maintained between completion of painting
4 3 4 MR and port arrival/ Tyre test to be carried out.
1 4 LR NO
5
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
Personnel Gas monitors to be provided. Painting jobs to Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
be suspended and space evacuated in event of any
1 Acceptable
alarms noted on the personal gas monitors.
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
RISK ASSESSMENT
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : REEFERS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : CONTROLLED ATMOSPHERE TRANSPORTATION If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : Last :
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Leakage of Nitrogen gas from fresh air supply and exhaust Dizziness, nausea, decrease in Fresh air supply and exhaust trunking for each
trunking. muscular power, and collapse compartment to be blanked/sealed.
1 due to inability to support body 4 4 HR 3 4 MR YES
weight leading to death
Flow gas re‐circulation lines blanked Flow gas will not return to CA Blanks to be removed from flow gas re-
4 container 3 3 MR circulation lines during ballast passage 1 3 LR NO
Bilge level alarms inoperable Bilge water overflowing into Bilge alarms / floats to be tested / overhauled
8 compartment
3 3 MR during ballast passage 3 3 MR YES
Leaks if any observed during loaded passage to be
5 stopped / sealed with High Expansion foam. Acceptable
Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
Crew training and discussions during safety meetings Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
6 and complement advised / reminded of hazards Acceptable be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
Switch to manual control of opening / closing expansion
7 valve to maintain required delivery air temperature Acceptable
Bilges to be sounded AM and PM and pumped out as Comments :
8 Acceptable
required Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : REEFERS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : DISCHARGING OF REEFER CARGO If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Physical contamination by stevedores / crew Damage to Cargo Personal hygiene. Cargo handling material (
1 2 4 MR walking boards) 1 4 LR NO
Microbiological contamination by stevedores / crew Damage to Cargo Personal hygiene of stevedores crew.
2 2 4 MR 1 4 LR NO
Contamination of cargo when opening tween decks, grease Damage to Cargo Cleaning of excess grease. Maintenance of
and hydraulic oil dropping on the cargo. hatch cover hydraulic cylinders to stop leaks.
3 2 4 MR Tween deck covers to be swept.
1 4 LR NO
Damage to opened hatch covers and tween decks and Damage to Equipment, Injury to Opened hatch covers and tween deck covers
possibly personnel in the vicinity due to violent swinging of Personnel secured on port and starboard sides by locking
6 cargo onto the pontoons.
2 5 MR levers.
1 5 MR YES
Danger of stevedore or crew falling inside the hold from Injury to Personnel Rig stanchions and tiger ropes in tween deck,
tween deck. when opened. Stanchion and guard railing
7 3 5 HR rigged over booby hatch opening. 1 5 MR YES
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : REEFERS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : LOADING REEFER CARGO If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Physical contamination by stevedores / crew Damage to Cargo Personal hygiene. Cargo handling material (
1 2 4 MR walking boards) 1 4 LR NO
Contamination of cargo when opening tween decks, grease Damage to Cargo Cleaning of excess grease. Maintenance of
and hydraulic oil dropping on the cargo. hatch cover hydraulic cylinders to stop leaks.
2 2 5 MR Tween deck covers to be swept.
1 5 MR YES
Stevedore or Crew tripping/falling down from slippery crane Injury to Personnel Crane ladder steps cleaned of oil. Oil on decks
ladder, due to loose or improperly fitted gratings inside cargo of crane housing thoroughly cleaned.
3 holds.
4 5 HR Maintenance of gratings prior loading operation 2 5 MR YES
as per SMMS
Damage to cargo due to rain or excessive heat in tropics. Damage to Cargo Close hatches
4 2 5 MR 1 5 MR YES
Frozen cargo found whitish in appearance Damage to Cargo Check pulp temperature of frozen cargo. Reject
cargo if pulp temperature is found higher.
5 3 5 HR Owners Charterers and P & I club informed.
1 5 MR YES
Damage to opened hatch covers and tween decks and Damage to Equipment Opened hatch covers and tween deck covers
possibly personnel in the vicinity due to violent swinging of secured on port and starboard sides by locking
8 cargo onto the pontoons.
3 5 HR levers. 1 5 MR YES
Checked during Inspection rounds by chief officer and Date and time when all controls are in place
reported to chief engineer for stopping the leaks. Cargo
3 Acceptable
holds to be inspected by chief officer prior loading
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : REEFERS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : MOVEMENT OF SPREADER FROM STOWAGE POSITION If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Uncontrolled swinging of spreader due to being out of sight Damage to Cargo, Equipment Ensure spreader is stowed in location visible to
1 of crane operator
3 5 HR crane operator. 1 5 MR YES
Crushing injury to crew member Injury to Personnel Crew member must not stand between the
spreader and container or bulkhead opposite
2 3 5 HR so as to avoid getting crushed.
1 5 MR YES
Injury to head due to hit by crane hook. Injury to toe due to Injury to Personnel Wear helmet with mfg date within last five
7 accidental dropping of crane hook on the Toe 3 5 HR years. Stay clear of swinging hook. Wear 1 5 MR YES
Safety Shoes. Be Alert.
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
If unable to stow in sight of crane operator. Ensure Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 proper signaling. Do not allow personnel in vicinity Acceptable
when lifting.
Use steadying line to hold spreader instead of pushing Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
2 Acceptable
the spreader by hand.
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
Bosun to carry out signaling, monitored by chief officer Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4 Acceptable
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
During tool box meeting crew instructed to hold that Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
6 part of the link or hook which will not result in crushing Acceptable be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
injury.
During tool box meeting crew instructed to be alert and
7 Acceptable
stay clear off the hook.
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
RISK ASSESSMENT
Improper segregation and stowage of dangerous cargo Damage to Equipment Separate Plans are issued to crew for IMDG
4 3 5 HR cargo 2 5 MR YES
Improper stowage of over height or over wide containers Damage to Equipment Separate Plans are issued to crew for Special
5 2 4 MR Cargo which includes IMDG ,Reefer and Over 1 4 LR NO
dimension cargo
Abnormal Heel of v/l due to loading/discharging of containers Damage to Equipment Use Auto heeling Tank. Use other ballast tks to
adjust heel and trim if auto heeling tank not
6 3 5 HR sufficient to control list
1 5 MR YES
Hold filling with water due to continued operation in rain Damage to Equipment Keep Hold Bilges clean and ready to use all the
times prior arrival to port. Test pumping
7 3 5 HR arrangement as per schedule in SMMS 1 5 MR YES
Risk of stowaways and pilferage of cargo due broken seal Damage to Equipment, Cargo Security Seals of all stuffed containers should
Claim, Stowaway Claim be checked if intact. Any broken seal must be
8 4 5 HR reported immediately to C/Off or master.
2 5 MR YES
Tripping hazards in cross decks and walkways Injury to Personnel All cross decks / walkways must be clear of any
obstruction e.g. loose lashing material, broken
9 3 5 HR steel gratings etc.
1 5 MR YES
Hold Bilges should be kept clean and dry prior arrival
7 port. Regularly check the high level alarm floats for early Acceptable
warning.
If possible open top containers to be checked from top. Comments :
8 Acceptable
Review dates Rank
Check that cross decks are cleared during routine
9 Acceptable 1
rounds.
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : CONTAINER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : CARGO OPERATION ‐ PAGE 2/2 If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Dangers due to poor condition of Container securing fittings. Damage to Cargo and Check the securing of all base/auto twist locks.
Bad Lashing Arrangement Equipment All lashing rods/turn buckles should be well
1 4 5 HR secured and as per ship's lashing plan
2 5 MR YES
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
Check container lashings prior use. Discard corroded Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 and defective lashing. Check the securing of container Acceptable
lashings
If any stevedore is crossing, a written notice should be Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
2 given to the stevedore supervisor/ terminal. Acceptable
Risk assessment to be carried out separately Date and time when all controls are in place
3 Acceptable
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : CONTAINER WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : DECK
Work Activity being assessed : HANDLING OF REEFER CONTAINERS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 20‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 20‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Hazards as for normal container cargo operations Injury to Personnel, Damage to Risk assessment for cargo operation to be
1 Cargo, Equipment 4 5 HR followed 2 5 MR YES
Damage to cargo in reefer container due reefer machinery Damage to Cargo, Equipment Reefer Containers machinery must face socket
problems. Possibility that reefer containers are loaded with as per reefer loading plan. Machinery should be
3 machinery facing forward and exposed to sea sprays.
3 4 MR in well ventilated area free of sea sprays. 1 4 LR NO
Damage to reefer cargo due lack of ventilation. Damage to Cargo, Equipment Cargo hold ventilation must be started if reefer
container is being loaded under deck. Check
cargo Manifest for information of ventilation
4 3 4 MR requirement. Flaps on container to be opened
1 4 LR NO
accordingly.
Charterer to be informed, protest lodged, Signature of Comments :
8 stevedores obtained. If IQF or VQF container P & I to be Acceptable
informed. Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Prepared by : MSQR
Issue Date : 31.3.98
WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Revised by : Director (Marine)
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2016
CRITICAL OPERATIONS Approved by : Directors
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT APPENDIX 1
MANUAL – PART II Index : RA-Engine Forms
: Page1
ENGINE
(For all ships)
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : CHANGEOVER FROM HSFO TO LSFO AND VICE VERSA If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 18‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 28‐Feb‐13
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
DAMAGE TO MACHINERY DUE TO LOW LUBRICITY & LOW Damage to Equipment USE LUBRICITY IMPROVERS. ORDER
VISCOCITY CORRECT BUNKER. MAINTAIN CORRECT
1 4 5 HR TEMPERATURE DURING CHANGEOVER 1 5 MR YES
AND USE
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : EMERGENCY PROCEUDRE IN CASE OF ER FIRE If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
SOME STAFF UNAWARE OF THE FIRE Injury to Personnel, Damage to ACTIVATE ALARM. INFORM BRIDGE. MAKE
1 Property/Cargo 4 5 HR ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE PUBLIC 1 5 MR YES
ADDRESS SYSTEM
UNAVAILIBILITY OF FIRE FIGHTING WATER OR SUFFICIENT Injury to Personnel, Damage to KEEP VALVES FOR FIRE PUMP ALWAYS
WATER DUE TO FAILURE OF FIRE LINE INTEGRITY ON DECK Property/Cargo OPEN. START FIRE PUMP IMMEDIATELY
AND LAY UP HOSES WITH NOZZLES
ATTACHED. ALL STAFF TO BE AWARE OF
2 2 5 MR ISOLATION VALVES AND SAME TO BE
1 5 MR YES
TESTED REGULARLYFOR PROPER
FUNCTIONING
Fire P/P not taking suction ( priming p/p not working ) Injury to Personnel, Damage to Monitor functioning of the Priming P/P while
9 Property/Cargo 2 5 MR trying out the Fire P/P 1 5 MR YES
From To
4 REGULAR TRAINING AND DRILL Acceptable Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only)
REGULAR TRAINING AND DRILL. REGULAR TEST OF
5 EMERGENCY STOPS AND QUICK CLOSING VALVES Acceptable
Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
REGULAR TRAINING AND DRILL. SENIOR OFFICERS TO Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
6 CHECK THE EMERGENCY ESCAPE ROUTE REGULARLY Acceptable be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
MASTER TO CONFIRM FROM CHIEF ENGR. THAT
7 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT IN GOOD RUNNING ORDER. Acceptable
DISCUSSION AND BRIEFING DURING SAFETY MEETING. Comments :
8 Acceptable
Review dates Rank
ALL MAINTENANCE TO BE CARRIED OUT AS PER SMMS,
9 VESSEL TO MAINTAIN ON BOARD MIN. CRITICAL SPARES Acceptable 1
AT ALL TIMES
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : EMERGENCY PROCEUDRE IN CASE OF GROUNDING If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
DAMAGE TO MAIN ENGINE AND PROPELLER Damage to STOP ENGINE IMMEDIATELY
1 Machinery/Euipments
4 5 HR 2 5 MR YES
CLOGGING OF COOLERS AND CONDENSER Damage to CHANGE OVER TO SUCTION TO HIGH SEA.
2 Machinery/Euipments 4 4 HR CLOSE LOW SEA SUCTION 1 4 LR NO
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
CHIEF ENGR. TO MAINTAIN RECORD AND NOTE IF THERE Date and time when all controls are in place
3 IS ANY INCREASE OR DECREASE OF SOUNDING Acceptable
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
CHIEF ENGR. TO BE PRESENT DURING MEASUREMENT Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
6 AND COMPARE WITH PREVIOUS READING. Acceptable be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
7
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : FUEL/ LUBRICATING OIL TRANSFER If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
OVERFLOW OF OIL Damage to Enviornment TAKE SOUNDING OF TANK RECEIVING OIL
BEFORE START OF TRANSFER AND THEN
1 4 5 HR EVERY 30 MINUTES THEREAFTER
1 5 MR YES
SUCTION FROM OR DISCHARGE TO TANK OTHER THAN THE Damage to Enviornment, Cargo CHECK ALL VALVES AND SHUT AND
2 ONE INTENDED 4 5 HR SECURE ALL VALVES NOT REQUIRED 1 5 MR YES
5
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 CHIEF ENGINEER TO SIGHT SOUNDING Acceptable Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
CHIEF ENGINEER TO CONFIRM CORRECT VALVES ARE Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
2 OPEN AND OTHER VALVES SHUT AND SECURED Acceptable
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : HANDLING OF WASTE OIL & BILGE WATER If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 18‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 28‐Feb‐13
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
DISCHARGE OVERBOARD OF WASTE OIL OR BILGE WATER Damage to Enviornment OVERBOARD VALVES TO BE SECURED
1 ABOVE 15 PPM
2 5 MR AND LOCKED 1 5 MR YES
INGRESS OF OIL/CHEMICALS/DETERGENTS INTO BILGES Damage to Enviornment / NOTICES PUT UP PROHIBITING POURING
Property OF OIL,CHEMICAL OR DETERGENT WATER
2 4 5 HR IN BILGES OR WASHBASINS IN ENGINE
1 5 MR YES
ROOM
INGRESS OF OIL INTO BILGES Damage to Enviornment / DRAINS AND CHANNELS ALONG M/E
Property C/CASE DOORS TO KEEP CLEAR. OIL
3 4 5 HR LEAKS TO BE IMMEDIATELY RECTIFIED.
1 5 MR YES
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
CHIEF ENGR. TO KEEP THE KEY AND OPEN ONLY WHEN Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 DISCHARGING TO SHORE RECEPTION OR USING OWS Acceptable
FREQUENTLY CHECK SAMPLE OF WATER BEING
7 Acceptable
DRAINED.
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : PROCEDURES IN HEAVY WEATHER If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 18‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
SHIFTING OF HEAVY PARTS OR OTHER ITEMS Damage to Equipment EXTRA LASHING TO BE TAKEN. FREQUENT
1 2 5 MR CHECKS TO BE MADE 1 5 MR YES
INJURY TO PERSONNEL Injury to Personnel ALL STAFF TO BE INFORMED OF
IMPENDING OF BAD WEATHER AND
2 2 5 MR INSTRUCTED TO HOLD ONTO RAILS WHEN
1 5 MR YES
MOVING AROUND
DAMAGE TO MAIN ENGINE DUE TO OVERLOAD OR Damage to Equipment SET GOVERNOR TO ROUGH WEATHER
3 FLUCTUATION OF RPM 2 5 MR MODE OR REDUCE RPM TO OPTIMUM 1 5 MR YES
LEVEL.
CHOKING OF FUEL FILTERS Damage to Equipment KEEP CLOSE WATCH ON FUEL PRESSURE.
DRAIN SERVICE TANK FREQUENTLY. USE
4 2 5 MR 1 5 MR YES
HIGHER LEVEL SUCTION VALVE WHERE
PROVIDED.
MAIN AND AUX. ENGINE LO PUMP INTERMITTENT SUCTION Damage to Equipment MAINTAIN HIGHER LO SUMP LEVEL
5 LOSS
3 4 MR 1 4 LR NO
LOSS OF FO TRANSFER PUMP SUCTION RESULTING IN LOW Damage to Equipment USE BUNKER TANK WHICH IS FULL, WHERE
SERVICE TANK LEVEL POSSIBLE. KEEP CONSTANT WATCH ON
6 2 4 MR PUMP AND TANK LEVEL. OPERATE PUMP 1 4 LR NO
MANUALLY.
CLOSE WATCH OF MAIN ENGINE BY WATCH KEEPERS. Date and time when all controls are in place
3 MONITORING OF ME BY CHIEF ENGR. ENGINE ROOM TO Acceptable
BE MANNED.
ENGINE ROOM TO BE MANNED. TOOLS AND FILTER Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
4 ELEMENTS KEPT READY FOR FILTER CLEANING. Acceptable
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to be Yes No
CHIEF ENGR. TO ENSURE THAT SWITCH IS IN MANUAL considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
7 Acceptable
POSITION
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : PROCEDURES IN EXTREME COLD AND ICY WATERS If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 18‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
FO/LO BECOMING VERY VISCOUS OR FREEZING Damage to Equipment / Property MAINTAIN TEMPERATURE. ENSURE
TRACING STEAM FULLY OPEN. IN PORT
1 4 5 HR KEEP CIRCULATING PUMPS RUNNING. RUN
1 5 MR YES
AE ON DO
CRANES AND WINCHES INOPERABLE DUE TO COLD OIL Damage to Equipment / Property KEEP OIL PUMPS RUNNING. HEAT OIL IN
2 2 5 MR TANK
1 5 MR YES
COOLING DOWN OF ENGINE Damage to Equipment / Property OPEN STEAM TO EXPANSION TK. USE
PREHEATER. USE SAME COOLER FOR ME
3 2 5 MR AND AE. OPEN S.W RECIRCULATING VALVE
1 5 MR YES
HO TRANSFER LOSS OF SUCTION Damage to Equipment / Property USE BUNKER TANK CLOSE TO PUMP. KEEP
CIRCULATING FROM TANK TO TANK IF
8 4 5 HR SHIFTER PUMP ARRANGEMENT NOT 1 5 MR YES
PROVIDE.
FREEZING OF SW AND FW PIPELINES Damage to Equipment / Property DRAIN ALL PIPES NOT IN USE OR
9 4 4 HR CIRCULATION.
1 4 LR NO
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
CLOSE MONITORING BY WATCH KEEPERS. ADD ANTI Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 Acceptable
FREEZE IN OIL IF PERMITTED
CHIEF ENGINEER TO CONFIRM THAT PUMPS ARE Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
2 Acceptable
RUNNING AND HEATING IS ON
CHIEF ENGINEER TO CONFIRM HEATING OPEN AND Date and time when all controls are in place
3 Acceptable
MONITOR CONSTANTLY.
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
CHIEF ENGR. TO CONFIRM STEAM OPEN OR INTERNAL
5 TANK USED. CLOSE MONITORING OF TEMPERATURES OF Acceptable
ENGINES Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
CONSTANT MONITORING OF CHARGE AIR Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
6 Acceptable
TEMPERATURE. be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
7
CONSTANTLY MONITOR PUMP AND SERVICE TANK Comments :
8 Acceptable
LEVEL. OPERATE PUMP MANUALLY Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : OPERATION OF MAIN AND AUXILIARY ENGINE If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 18‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 28‐Feb‐13
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
OVERLOADING OF ENGINE, DAMAGE TO PARTS Damage to Machinery / CHECK RPM & FO CONSUMPTION AND
Equipment COMPARE WITH MANUFACTURER'S DATA.
1 2 5 MR BE IN THE PERMISSIBLE REGION 1 5 MR YES
CONFIRM TO CARRY OUT PMS TEST AND INSPECTION Comments :
8 Acceptable
REGULARLY Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : OILY WATER SEPERATOR OPERATION If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 18‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
DISCHARGE OF OILY WATER ABOVE 15 PPM OVERBOARD Damage to Enviornment TEST 15 PPM MONITOR BEFORE
OPERATION. CLEANING FRESH WATER
1 2 5 MR VALVE TO BE KEPT OPENED DURING 1 5 MR YES
OPERATION
DISCHARGE OF OILY WATER OVERBOARD THROUGH SHORE Damage to Enviornment SHORE DISCHARGE VALVE TO BE KEPT
2 DISCHARGE
2 5 MR SHUT AND FLANGE BLANKED. 1 5 MR YES
FILLING UP OF BILGE SEPERATED OIL TANK Damage to Enviornment / CHECK THAT OIL DISCHARGE VALVE IS
3 Property
2 4 MR NOT LEAKING.
1 4 LR NO
DAMAGE TO OILY WATER SEPERATOR Damage to Enviornment / DO NOT OVER PRESSURISE THE
Property SEPERATOR ADJUST PUMP DISCHARGE
4 2 4 MR PRESSURE. ENSURE OVERBOARD VALVE 1 4 LR NO
OPEN BEFORE START.
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
CHIEF ENGR. TO TEST, SHUT AND LOCK FW VALVE AND Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 Acceptable
THEN ALLOW OPERATION.
CHIEF ENGR. TO ENSURE VALVE SHUT AND SECURED AND Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
2 Acceptable
FLANGE BLANKED.
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
CHIEF ENGR. TO ENSURE ALL VALVE SHUTS AND SECURED
5 Acceptable
Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
CHIEF ENGR. TO ENSURE BEFORE ALLOWING OPERATION Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to be Yes No
6 Acceptable
considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
7
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : OPERATION OF PURIFIER PLANT If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 18‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
DAMAGE TO MACHINERY Damage to Property / Machinery PERIODIC OVERHAUL AS PER
MAKER'S/COMPANY'S RECOMMENDATION.
1 2 4 MR DAILY CHECK FOR ABNORMAL NOISE OR 1 4 LR NO
VIBRATION.
4
5
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
DUTY ENGINEER TO MONITOR THE PARAMETER Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
2 Acceptable
SAFETY PROCEDURES TO BE DISCUSSED IN TOOL BOX Date and time when all controls are in place
3 MEETING. CHECK THOROUGHLY BEFORE STARTING Acceptable
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to be Yes No
7 considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : OPERATION OF PURIFIER PLANT If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
DAMAGE TO MACHINERY Damage to Property / Machinery PERIODIC OVERHAUL AS PER
MAKER'S/COMPANY'S RECOMMENDATION.
DAILY CHECK FOR ABNORMAL NOISE OR
1 2 4 MR 1 4 LR NO
VIBRATION AND CURRENT DRAWN BY THE
PURIFIER
4
5
6
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
DUTY ENGINEER TO MONITOR THE PARAMETER Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
2 Acceptable
SAFETY PROCEDURES TO BE DISCUSSED IN TOOL BOX Date and time when all controls are in place
3 MEETING. CHECK THOROUGHLY BEFORE STARTING Acceptable
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to be Yes No
7 considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : MANOEUVRING IN NARROW OR CONGESTED WATER If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 18‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last :
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
LOSS OF ELECTRICAL POWER Damage to Vessel, Equipment, TWO GENERATORS SHOULD BE RUNNING.
Machinery, Cargo and Safety of STAND BY GENERATOR KEPT READY FOR
1 Personnel.
2 5 MR START
1 5 MR YES
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
MASTER TO CONFIRM FROM CHIEF ENGR. THAT TWO Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 GENERATORS RUNING AND STAND BY READY Acceptable
MASTER TO ENSURE STEERING GEAR TRIED OUT. Date and time when all controls are in place
3 Acceptable
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
CHIEF ENGR. TO ENSURE DO TANK IS FULL AND ALL
5 OFFICERS AWARE OF CHANGE OVER PROCEDURE Acceptable
Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
CONSTANT WATCH ON COMPRESSORS AND STARTING Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
6 Acceptable
AIR PRESSURE TO BE KEPT. be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
7
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : HEAVY/LARGE MACHINERY OVERHAUL If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 18‐Dec‐13 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last :
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
Weather conditions Injury to Personnel, Damage to Weather forecast to be checked, if likely to
1 Equipment / Machinery 2 5 MR deteriorate, additional measures to be taken 1 5 MR YES
Possibility of staff getting hurt in absence of PPE, Cleanliness Injury to Personnel To ensure all staff allocated for this job has
3 of the working area 3 5 HR proper PPE, The area must be maintained 1 5 MR YES
clean to avoid slipping
Possible damages in case Maker's procedures are not followed Damage to Equipment / To discuss in tool box meeting, photocopy of
4 Machinery 2 5 MR procedures to hand over to staff 1 5 MR YES
Securing arrangements of Cyl Head, Piston and other items in Damage to Equipment / Stand for cyl head, piston etc. to keep ready
5 open condition Machinery
2 4 MR 1 4 LR NO
Lifting appliances. Injury to personnel due to parting of sling. Damage to Equipment / Visual check of wire, limit switches and cut outs
Load getting caught in beams, supports etc. Machinery to try prior starting the job. Crane operator
6 2 5 MR should always be watching load & sling to note 1 5 MR YES
smooth load movement, wire tautness etc.
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
Name of Vessel : M.T. /M.V. WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : FUEL V/V TEST RM
Work Activity being assessed : MAIN AND A/E FUEL VALVE TESTING If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐May‐14 Last Assessment: 07‐May‐14 Current : Last :
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
1 Testing Equipment not properly secured Personnel Injury, Machinery 2 2 LR Checks to be carried out prior test. 1 2 LR NO
Testing Equipment not in good condition. d
Personnel Injury, Machinery Checks to be carried out prior test.
2 2 2 LR 1 2 LR NO
d
3 Pipe / hose in bad condition Personnel Injury, Fire 2 3 LR Visual checks to be carried out prior test. 1 3 LR NO
4 Pipe / hose connections are loose. Personnel Injury 2 2 LR Checks to be carried out prior test. 1 2 LR NO
Presence of flame/spark nearby Fire Ensure no source of flame/spark in the vicinity
5 3 3 MR while carrying out test 1 3 LR NO
6 Fuel valve infirmly secured to test bed. Personnel Injury 3 2 LR Checks to be carried out prior test. 1 2 LR NO
7 Incorrect PPE. Personnel Injury 1 3 LR Proper PPE such as gloves, eye protector and 1 1 LR NO
t l t b d
8 Slip, trip and fall. Personnel Injury 3 3 MR Area to be maintained clean. 1 3 LR NO
9 Possible damages in case Maker's procedures are not Machinery damage 2 3 LR To discuss in Tool Box meeting. Procedure to 1 3 LR NO
f ll d h d t t ff
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 DO JOB
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
1 Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
2 Discussed hazards and controls with team Yes No
3 Date and time when all controls are in place
4 Shut down period for this RA (For work on critical jobs only) From To
5 Evaluation of Risk Assessment after completion of work
6 Any new hazard or missed hazard ( If Yes, Mention in comments and to Yes No
7 be considered when doing next risk assessment for the same job )
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
RISK ASSESSMENT
ENGINE
(For Tankers)
Name of Vessel : ALL SHIPS WALLEM RISK ASSESSMENT Work area : ENGINE
Work Activity being assessed : OPERATION OF CARGO OIL PUMP TURBINES If any hazard manifests itself even after effective control
Code : No. ‐ Number, LKH ‐ Likelihood, SVR ‐ Severity, RF ‐ Risk Factor, A.C ‐ Additional controls measures were taken or develops unexpectedly, then work
Code for Risk Factor : HR ‐ High risk, MR ‐ Medium risk, LR ‐ Low risk should be stopped and office informed
For unusual jobs and work on critical equipment, copy of risk assessment to be sent to office For Office use : For standard risk assessments in SBM II
Date of Risk Assessment 07‐Jun‐16 Last Assessment: 18‐Dec‐13 Current : 18‐Dec‐13 Last : 30‐Jun‐12
SECTION 1 Please see below for the risk estimator Risk rating Residual Risk
No. Hazard Consequence LKH SVR RF Controls LKH SVR RF A.C
INJURY TO PERSONNEL Injury to Personnel WEAR CORRECT PPE. STEAM LINES TO BE
DRAINED SLOWLY TO PREVENT
1 2 5 MR SPLASHING OF HOT WATER
1 5 MR YES
7
8
9
Section 2 ‐ Additional controls Acceptable/Intolerable If ALARP then fill Additional controls in section 2 ALARP
No. Controls to ALARP ( As Low as reasonably practical) To Be completed prior commencement of work
2ND ENGINEER TO DISCUSS THE MATTER IN THE Alternate method of work considered and found not applicable Yes No
1 TOOLBOX MEETING PRIOR ARRIVAL DISCHARGE PORT Acceptable
CHIEF ENGINEER TO CONFIRM MONITORING BY OOW Date and time when all controls are in place
3 Acceptable
7
8 Comments : Review dates Rank
9 1
2
DO JOB
Prepared by: A risk assessment can be reviewed and then used within one month period
3
basis no change in hazard or control measures ‐ (NA for SMMS)
4
Ver 2.0 / Nov 13
WALLEM Prepared by : Director (SID)
Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD HAZARD / RISK FACTOR & Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
CONTROL MEASURE FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2010
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT ALL OTHER OPERATION Approved by : Managing Director
MANUAL – PART II APPENDIX 2 Page -1-
Appendix 2 of SBM II
Note :
1. The contents of this section would be amended as required. More jobs would be
added based on the review of the SMS system, if required.
Appendix 2 of SBM II : Hazard Identification / Risk Assessment and control measures for Non Critical jobs
Bridge Procedures
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION OPERATIONS ASSESMENT HAZARD / RISK FACTORS DETAILS OF CONTROL MEASURE
Bridge Team management whilst under Damage to vessel Failure to follow procedures Follow correct procedures as per BPM
pilotage
Damage to environment Not working as a team
Injury to Personnel
Change of OOW procedures Damage to vessel Information missed out during As per checklist in BPM
change
Damage to environment
Change of pilots Damage to vessel Information missed out during
change of pilots
Damage to environment
Change over hand/auto steering (testing once Damage to vessel Not tested Familaristation as familarisation
per watch) checklist in BPM
Damage to environment Wrong testing procedure
Corrections of Charts & Publications Damage to vessel Correction missed out Verification of chart correction by Master
Checked during Bridge procedure
Damage to environment Corrections not done correctly audits by Training superintendents.
Follow correct procedures as per BPM
to avoid false distress alarms.
Damage to vessel
False alarm sent out by In case false alert is sent, vessel to
Distress alarms Damage to environment mistake during maintenance follow poster procedure to inform MRCC
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION OPERATIONS ASSESMENT HAZARD / RISK FACTORS DETAILS OF CONTROL MEASURE
Familiarisation with bridge equipment Damage to vessel Familarisation not done Familarisation checklist in BPM to be
used
Damage to environment Some equipment missed out
during familarisation
Questioning and/or countermanding pilots Damage to vessel Insufficient judgement prior Proper judgement to excersied by
advice countermanding Master prior countermanding
Damage to environment
Damage to vessel
Not practiced as per
Navigational Emergency drills Damage to environment requirement To be practiced as per drill matrix
Speed to be maintained to allow for safe
operations
Damage to vessel Excessive speed Course and speed to be adjusted to
Storing/Crew change whilst underway Damage to environment Weather conditions counteract weather effects.
Testing bridge equipment, daily at noon Damage to vessel Some equipment missed out Checklist from BPM to be used for daily
during testing checks at noon.
Damage to environment
Briefing to be done on tug positioning.
Damage to vessel
Tug to be positioned correctly Dangers from making fast and casting
Damage to environment off tug to be discussed with crew during
Injury to crew while making fast
Tug positioning, making fast/casting off Injury to personnel and casting off toolbox meeting.
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM HAZARD / RISK FACTOR & Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
CONTROL MEASURE FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
ALL OTHER OPERATION Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2012
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
APPENDIX 2 Page -4-
Change of watch Damage to vessel Slack mooring Proper round before taking over
Damage to environment Oil leaks on deck Discussed in meeting prior arrival port
Injury to personnel Trip hazards
Damage to equipment Poor handling
Checking watertight integrity of upper deck Damage to vessel Left in open condition Proper checks
& accommodation
Damage to environment Closed loop conditions
Connecting/disconnecting bunker hose Damage to environment Flange not tightened Proper verification of flange tightness
Injury to personnel Swinging hose Toolbox meeting
Damage to equipment Unfamiliar crew or new crew Familiarisation and training
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM HAZARD / RISK FACTOR & Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
CONTROL MEASURE FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
ALL OTHER OPERATION Rev.No. / Date : Jan 2012
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II Approved by : Managing Director
APPENDIX 2 Page -6-
Specification/ordering of PPE/Safety Injury to personnel Poor supply To be returned and new item procured
equipment
Not as per specification Separate requisition for PPE to be made by ship
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD HAZARD / RISK FACTOR & Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
CONTROL MEASURE FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2010
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II ALL OTHER OPERATION Approved by : Managing Director
APPENDIX 2 Page -8-
Windlass and winches – Changing brake Injury to personnel Impact injury Toolbox meeting
lining
Eye injury Correct PPE
Movement of heavy object Proper slings and lifting gear
Crush injury
Air pipes / Vents / PV Valves : Overhauling Injury to personnel Impact injury Toolbox meeting
/ Inspection by removal of head or cowl
Damage to equipment Eye injury Correct PPE
Movement of heavy object Proper slings and lifting gear
Crush injury
Galley routines work Injury to personnel Cut injury Care when using knife
Slip, trip and fall injury Care when cutting fish
Rolling and pitching Galley to be kept clean
Walking space in galley to be clear of obstructions
Accommodation cleaning and other work Injury to personnel Slip, trip and fall injury Care when climbing up or down stairways in
within accommodation accommodation
Cut injury
Care when climbing up or down with sharp objects
Rolling and pitching or objects like plates which can break and have
sharp edges if they were to fall
Cabin Injuries Injury to personnel Slip, trip and fall injury Anti slip mat to be put outside toilets so personnel
do not fall after bath
Cut injury
Cabin to be kept clean
Rolling and pitching
Sharp objects to be handles with care.
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD HAZARD / RISK FACTOR & Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
CONTROL MEASURE FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2010
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II ALL OTHER OPERATION Approved by : Managing Director
APPENDIX 2 Page - 11 -
Routine Jobs – Not covered in this section Injury to personnel Various as decided by Toolbox meetings
department head and his
Damage to equipment team
Unusual Jobs – Not covered in this section Injury to personnel Various as decided by Risk Assessment to be carried out by the
department head and his department head
Damage to equipment team
Safety meetings
Toolbox meetings
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD HAZARD / RISK FACTOR & Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
CONTROL MEASURE FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2010
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II ALL OTHER OPERATION Approved by : Managing Director
APPENDIX 2 Page - 12 -
Cargo operations Damage to vessel Error in operation Cargo operation to be discussed in safety meeting
Damage to environment One man error to be avoided
Injury to personnel
Damage to equipment
Communication internal Damage to vessel Inoperative Communication to be checked at regular intervals
Damage to environment
Communication ship/terminal Damage to vessel Inoperative Communication to be checked at regular intervals
Damage to environment
Draining tanks Damage to environment Operational error Soundings to be checked after valve secured
Damage to equipment All tanks to be sounded by a different person to
confirm tank is empty ( avoiding one man error)
Inerting/Purging of cargo tanks Damage to vessel Still air condition Follow tanker procedures
Injury to personnel Oxygen content not as Watch wind for dispersing gases
required
Damage to equipment Toolbox meeting
Monitoring/sounding/checks of ballast Damage to equipment Over flowing in port Ballast tank to be monitored as per plan
tanks
Injury to personnel Running pump dry Soundings to be checked as per plan
Not securing valves properly Tank should not be over flowed in port
after completion of
deballasting Valves to be secured after completion of
deballasting
Soundings of all ballast tanks to be taken after valve
secured.
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD HAZARD / RISK FACTOR & Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
CONTROL MEASURE FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2010
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II ALL OTHER OPERATION Approved by : Managing Director
APPENDIX 2 Page - 16 -
Clearing the container lashings Injury to personnel Wrong posture Toolbox meeting
Damage to equipment Throwing lashings
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD HAZARD / RISK FACTOR & Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
CONTROL MEASURE FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2010
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II ALL OTHER OPERATION Approved by : Managing Director
APPENDIX 2 Page - 21 -
Appendix 2 of SBM II: Hazard Identification / Risk Assessment and control measures for Other jobs
ENGINE - GENERAL
Procedures in extreme heat Injury to personnel Loss of body water Toolbox meetings
Damage to equipment Overheating Take salt tablets and lot of water
Maintain all equipment parameters
Heavy oil/Diesel oil change over Damage to vessel Thermal shock Toolbox meeting
Damage to environment Loss of Propulsion or Follow correct procedure of change over of fuel as
Electric power per the instruction manual
Damage to equipment
Change over procedures to UMS Damage to vessel Non availability of stand by Follow checklist. Take a thorough round of engine
machinery room before change over to UMS
Damage to environment
Non availability of Bridge Take Chief Engineer permission
Damage to equipment control of Main engine
Inform Bridge before change over
Alarms not operational or in
active state Ensure no alarms are in activated state. Test alarms
periodically
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD HAZARD / RISK FACTOR & Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
CONTROL MEASURE FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2010
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II ALL OTHER OPERATION Approved by : Managing Director
APPENDIX 2 Page - 22 -
Sounding of tanks Damage to environment Incorrect sounding leading to When taking sounding take two times.
overflow or lack of fuel.
Damage to cargo Take sounding periodically.
Incorrect Calculation
Lack of fuel Chief Engr. to verify calculation and maintain record
Draining of fuel tanks Damage to equipment Water and/or Catfines in oil Toolbox meeting
Injury to personnel Splashing of hot oil OOW to confirm draining is carried out every watch
Boiler entry Injury to personnel Hot surface. Lack of air Toolbox meeting
Boiler not positively cut off Permission from Chief Engineer before entry.
Use of chemicals Damage to equipment Wrong or excess chemical Toolbox meeting
used
Injury to personnel Wear correct PPE
Contact with body parts
Read MSDS sheets
Storing of chemicals and fuel sample Injury to personnel Storing in wrong location Safety meeting
Damage to environment Drums/Containers not Storing in chemical locker only
lashed
Proper lashing and checking of lashing regularly
Contact with body parts due
to spill or leak Regular checks for damage to containers and leaks
Correct PPE & MSDS sheets kept in the locker
Ballasting/De-ballasting Damage to vessel Running pump dry Toolbox meeting
Damage to equipment Undue stresses of Ballasting/De-ballasting as per plan
structurals
Soundings to constantly monitored
Leaky or wrong valves
operated Pump to be checked periodically during operation
Clear communication with deck department
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD HAZARD / RISK FACTOR & Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
CONTROL MEASURE FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2010
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II ALL OTHER OPERATION Approved by : Managing Director
APPENDIX 2 Page - 23 -
Sewage Plant operation Damage to equipment Discharge overboard of non Operation of plant as per instruction manual
treated sewage
Injury to personnel Regular maintenance of equipment and testing of
Running pump or blower dry alarms
Damage to environment
Alarms non operational Monitoring during operation
Incinerator plant operation Injury to personnel Contact with hot surface Toolbox meeting
Damage to equipment Burning prohibited item Operation of plant as per instruction manual
Damage to environment Use in prohibited areas Regular maintenance of equipment and testing of
alarms
Damage to vessel Fire hazard
Monitoring during operation
Turning M/E whilst at Port Damage to equipment Propeller hitting boats or any Toolbox meeting
Injury to personnel person Clearance from deck OOW
Propeller entangled with Notice put up at the stern
ropes
EGB Washing Injury to personnel Contact with hot surface Toolbox meeting
Damage to equipment Inhalation of carbon dust Wear correct PPE. No leaks in water or air hoses.
Uptake fire Permission from senior officer before start of work
Water ingress to Main Inspection by senior officer before closing door
Engine
Close monitoring during cleaning
Prepared by : Director (SID)
WALLEM Issue Date : 31.3.98
SHIPMANAGEMENT LTD HAZARD / RISK FACTOR & Revised by : Marine Supdt (SID)
CONTROL MEASURE FOR 3rd Edition : 31.1.06
Rev.No. / Date : Jun 2010
SHIPBOARD MANAGEMENT MANUAL – PART II ALL OTHER OPERATION Approved by : Managing Director
APPENDIX 2 Page - 24 -
Blowing through and trying out main Injury to personnel Indicator cocks closed Toolbox meeting
engine prior departure
Damage to equipment Cargo gears not removed Clear instruction from Bridge and movement of
telegraph.
Damage to shore Moorings slack
equipment, structures or Clear verbal confirmation that all indicator cocks are
personnel Boat or ropes near propeller open.
Clear visual confirmation that all personnel are away
from cylinder head platform.
Before trying out on fuel - clear verbal confirmation
that all indicator cocks are closed.
Testing & Maintenance of OWS Damage to environment Handling heavy weights Toolbox meeting
Injury to personnel Slip, trip and fall Use correct PPE.
Damage to equipment Error in 15 ppm monitor Use correct and tested tools and tackles
Use of prohibited tools or Follow instructions of the manual
chemicals for cleaning
Test the monitor onboard and ashore periodically