M Review Form Appendixe.1

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: KATHLEEN LEONIBETH B. GARCIA Name of Rater: SUSANA SA. BENITEZ, Ph.D.
Position: Teacher II Position: Principal I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd-Camarines Sur Date of Review:
Rating Period:
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

Time Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Means of Verification Performanc
line per KRA Results
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Educatio Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet and/or
n and content within inter-observer agreement
Services Pedagogy and across form about knowledge of
curriculum content within and across
teaching curriculum teaching areas
areas. 2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs developed
highlighting integration of
content knowledge within
and across subject areas Efficiency
3. Instructional materials
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration
in other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and
across subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Page 1 of 10
Time Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
line per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 2. Used a 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Educatio range of (COT) rating sheet and/or
n teaching inter-observer agreement
Services strategies that form about teaching
enhance strategies that enhance
learner learner achievement in
achievement in literacy and numeracy
literacy and skills
numeracy 2. Lesson plans/modified
skills. DLLs used in teaching
highlighting learner-
centered strategies that
Efficiency
promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
highlighting learner-
centered strategies that
promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
material(s) used in Timeliness
teaching
5. Results of assessment
used in teaching
provide annotations)
Page 2 of 10
Time Weight
line per KRA
Basic 3. Applied a 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Educatio range of (COT) rating sheet and/or
n teaching inter-observer agreement
Services strategies to form about teaching
develop critical strategies to develop
and creative critical and creative
thinking, as thinking, as well as other
well as other higher-order thinking skills
higher-order 2. Lesson plans/modified
thinking skills. DLLs used in teaching
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and
creative thinking and/or Efficiency
other HOTS
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching Timeliness
5. Results of assessment
used in teaching
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality

Educatio Environmen classroom (COT) rating sheet and/or
n t and structure to inter-observer agreement
Services Diversity of engage form about managing
Learners learners, classroom structure that
individually or engages learners in
Page 3 of 10
Time Weight
line per KRA
in groups, in various activities Efficiency
meaningful 2. Lesson plans/modified
exploration, DLLs highlighting various
discovery and classroom management
hands-on strategies that engage
activities within learners in activities/tasks
a range of in different physical
physical learning environments Timeliness
learning 3. Others (Please specify and
environments. provide annotations)
Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation tool Quality

Educatio learner (COT) rating sheet and/or
n behavior inter-observer agreement form
Services constructively about teacher management of
by applying learner behavior using the
positive and following strategies:
non-violent 1. Providing motivation
discipline to 2. Praising the Efficiency
ensure learners/Giving positive
learning- feedback
focused 3. Setting house
environments. rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
5. Allowing learners to
express their
ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities
to learners Timeliness
7. Encouraging learners to
ask questions
Page 4 of 10
Time Weight
line per KRA
Basic 6. Used 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Educatio differentiated, (COT) rating sheet and/or
n developmentall inter-observer agreement
Services y appropriate form about using
learning differentiated,
experiences to developmentally
address appropriate learning
learners’ experiences
gender, needs, 2. Lesson plans/modified
strengths, DLLs developed Efficiency
interests and highlighting differentiation
experiences. in content, product,
process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process, learning
environment or others Timeliness
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
Basic 3. 7. Planned, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality

Educatio Curriculum managed and (COT) rating sheet and/or
n and implemented inter-observer agreement
Services Planning developmentall form about using
y sequenced developmentally
teaching and sequenced teaching and
learning learning process
processes to 2. Lesson plans/modified
meet DLLs highlighting
curriculum developmentally
Page 5 of 10
Time Weight
line per KRA
requirements sequenced instruction that Efficiency
and varied meet curriculum goals and
teaching varied teaching contexts
contexts. 3. Instructional materials used
to implement
developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning process to meet
curriculum requirements
and varied teaching
contexts
Timeliness
8. Participated 1. Personal notes of teachers Quality
in collegial on LACs/FGDs/meetings
discussions with proof of attendance
that use 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
teacher and sessions on use of teacher
learner and learner feedback to Efficiency
feedback to enrich teaching practice
enrich with proof of attendance
teaching 3. Others (Please specify and
practice. provide annotations)
Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Educatio developed, (COT) rating sheet and/or
n organized and inter-observer agreement
Services used form about using
appropriate appropriate teaching and
teaching and learning resources,
learning including ICT
Page 6 of 10
Time Weight
line per KRA
resources, Examples: Efficiency
including ICT,  Activity sheets/task
to address sheets/work sheets
learning goals.  PowerPoint
presentations
 Video clips
 Module
 SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials
 Others Timeliness
2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs with appropriate
instructional materials
appended
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Educatio Assessment selected, (COT) rating sheet and/or
n and organized and inter-observer agreement
Services Reporting used form about using
diagnostic, diagnostic, formative and
formative and summative assessment
summative strategies
assessment 2. Prepared lesson
strategies plans/modified DLLs
consistent with highlighting appropriate
curriculum use of formative
requirements. assessment strategies
3. Developed diagnostic
tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed summative
tests: (a) with TOS
Page 7 of 10
Time Weight
line per KRA
reviewed by superior; (b) Efficiency
questionnaire/answer
sheets
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
rubrics
Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored 1. Compilation of a learner’s Quality
Educatio and evaluated written work with summary
n learner of results and with
Services progress and signature of parents
achievement 2. Formative/summative
using learner assessment tools with TOS Efficiency
attainment and frequency of errors
data. with identified least
mastered skills
3. Class records/grading
sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified Timeliness
DLLs showing index of
mastery
Page 8 of 10
Time Weight
line per KRA
Basic 12. 1. At least 3 samples of Quality
Educatio Communicated corrected test papers of the
n promptly and same 3 learners in the
Services clearly the same learning area with
learners’ parents’ or guardians’
needs, signature and date of
progress and
receipt
achievement
2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Efficiency
to key
stakeholders, Parent-Teacher
including conferences in all quarters
parents/guardi with proof of
ans. parent’s/guardian’s
attendance
3. Report cards with parent’s
or guardian’s signature in
all quarters supported by
minutes of meeting Timeliness
4. Communication with
parents/guardians using
various modalities
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing
learner needs, progress
and achievement submitted
to other stakeholders
Page 9 of 10
Time Weight
line per KRA
Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition or Quality
Education Factor various related Participation
Services works/activities 2. Certificate of Training
that contribute 3. Certificate of Speakership
to the 4. Committee involvement
teaching- 5. Advisorship of Co-
learning curricular activities
Efficiency
process. 6. Book or Journal
Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorship
7. Coordinatorship/
Chairpersonship
8. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers
10. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
KATHLEEN LEONIBETH B. GARCIA SUSANA SA. BENITEZ, Ph.D. JEREMIAS F. MASAPOL

Rater Ratee Public School District Supervisor
Page 10 of 10

M Review Form Appendixe.1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

M Review Form Appendixe.1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality

Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation tool Quality

Basic 3. 7. Planned, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality

KATHLEEN LEONIBETH B. GARCIA SUSANA SA. BENITEZ, Ph.D. JEREMIAS F. MASAPOL

You might also like