Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Parrs Wood Assessment Mark Sheet

AS English Literature
Module 2

Name

Teacher

Essay question

AO1 Articulate AO2 Demonstrate AO3 Explore AO4 Demonstrate Total


creative, informed and detailed critical connections and understanding of the
relevant responses to understanding in comparisons between significance and
literary texts, using analysing the ways in different literary influence of the
appropriate which structure, form texts, informed by contexts in which
terminology and and language shape interpretations of literary texts are
concepts, and coherent, meanings in literary texts other readers written and received
accurate written
expression
Weighting 10% 10% 10% 10% 40%
of AS

Teacher comments
(See back of sheet for detailed mark scheme)

Overall mark:
Marks AO1 Articulate creative, informed and AO2 Demonstrate detailed critical AO3 Explore connections and comparisons AO4 Demonstrate understanding of the
relevant responses to literary texts, using understanding in analysing the ways in which between different literary texts, informed by significance and influence of the contexts in
appropriate terminology and concepts, structure, form and language shape meanings interpretations of other readers which literary texts are written and
and coherent, accurate written in literary texts received
expression
Band quality of writing hinders meaning; very limited discussion of how form and little sense of connections between texts very limited understanding of ways of
1: unclear line of argument / not always structure shape meanings; very limited through concept of tragedy; little contextualising ‘tragedy’; very limited
0-5 relevant discussion of how aspects of language understanding of different interpretations of awareness of other contextual factors
shape meanings texts
Band some use of critical vocabulary despite some awareness of how form and structure some connections made between texts through some consideration of ways of
2: technical weakness; simple attempt at shape meanings; some awareness of how concept of tragedy; some reference to contextualising ‘tragedy’; some
6-10 structuring argument/usually relevant aspects of language shape meanings different interpretations of texts / some textual consideration of other relevant contextual
with some focus on task support factors
Band use of some critical vocabulary and consideration of some features of form and consideration of connections between texts consideration of ways of contextualising
3: generally clear expression; structure and how these features shape through concept of tragedy; consideration of ‘tragedy’ as a dramatic genre;
11-15 some structured argument though not meaning; consideration of some aspects of different interpretations of texts, with general consideration of a range of other
sustained/ relevant with focus on task language and how these aspects shape textual support contextual factors with specific links
meanings between context / texts / task
Band use of accurate critical vocabulary and consideration of how specific features of detailed consideration of connections between examination of ways of contextualising
4: clear argument expressed accurately; form and structure shape meanings; texts through concept of tragedy; clear ‘tragedy’ as a dramatic genre;
16-20 relevant with clear focus on task / consideration of how specific aspects of consideration of different interpretations of examination of a range of other
informed knowledge and understanding language shape meanings texts with apt supportive references contextual factors with specific, detailed
of texts links between context / texts / task
Band use of appropriate critical vocabulary exploration of several features of form and detailed and evaluative discussion of detailed exploration of ways of
5: and well structured argument expressed structure with evaluation of how they shape connections between texts through concept of contextualising ‘tragedy’ as a dramatic
21-25 accurately; relevant with sharp focus on meanings; exploration of several aspects of tragedy; clear consideration of different genre; detailed exploration of a range of
task / detailed knowledge and language with evaluation of how they shape interpretations of texts with evaluation of their other contextual factors with specific,
understanding of texts meanings strengths and weaknesses; and with significant detailed links between context/ texts/ task
supportive references
Band use of appropriate critical vocabulary exploration and analysis of key features of detailed and perceptive understanding of excellent understanding of ways of
6: and technically fluent style/ well form and structure with perceptive issues raised in connecting texts through contextualising ‘tragedy’ as a dramatic
26-30 structured and coherent argument; evaluation of how they shape meanings; concept of tragedy; perceptive consideration genre; excellent understanding of a range
always relevant with very sharp focus exploration and analysis of key aspects of of different interpretations of texts with sharp of other contextual factors with specific,
on task and confidently ranging around language with perceptive evaluation of how evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses; detailed links between context/ texts /task
texts they shape meanings excellent selection of supportive references

You might also like