Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Argumentative Essay: The Willingness of The Community To Participate in Nationwide Vaccination
Argumentative Essay: The Willingness of The Community To Participate in Nationwide Vaccination
Section: Subject:
Vaccination
Due to the emergence of the COVID-19 virus, and the drastic number of cases recorded
every single day, the government, inline with the Department of Health and the Local Barangay
Units has been working day and night to encourage the people to get vaccinated, as they are
aiming for herd immunity. As a student taking up medical related course, I often have heated
arguments with some of my family members due to their continuous resistance towards
vaccination, which increases their risk of contracting the virus, and spreading it to the most
vulnerable ones in our family. The scenarios usually start with one of my relative stating that the
COVID-19 vaccines are useless, and thus it will only cause them to harbor the virus, as a student
who is well-aware of the benefits of the vaccine to the community, I think it is my responsibility
to educate my family regarding the benefits of the vaccine as backed-up by science and research,
and thus some people do not like being corrected which will then result to heated arguments and
misunderstanding. I started to disagree with my relative in this situation by stating right away
that COVID-19 vaccines are made to save people lives, and thus it is stupid and/or unlikely to
think that it is useless, in which she responded that I do not know everything, and thus I should
mistakes I have done in that loop of communication, as stated above. Every conversation must
start with kind and respectful words, as to establish good connection with the person you are
talking, on that certain situation. Good communication must start with a good introduction of the
topic being discussed, and thus when a person is disagreeing a someone’s opinion or point of
view, there is no other way to say it, only respectfully. On that situation, I should have started by
giving regard to my relative, as to make her feel that I acknowledge her opinions and ideas
regarding this matter, and then slowly, I can open up the topic regarding the benefits of vaccine
to the community, and thus the percentage of vaccinated people around our community if data is
available. In that way, the conversation will have a clear motive, and it is leaning towards being
informative, rather than pessimistic. If the conversation went out that want way, I am quite sure
As to analyze the responses, I will utilize the old saying that says “Nasa huli ang
pagsisisi” because obviously, the way I handled that situation is not commendable, and it is to
conclude that the scenario I have just made as another way of handling the situation is a much
better response for the issue, because according to Kaufmann (n.d) effective communication
must always begin listening. Listening is vital as so to ensure that you were able to understand all
important points, that you can later support or go against. Overall attitude during the
conversation is also important, keeping yourself open, and relaxed throughout the conversation
will encourage a more intellectually lined conversation, rather than a conversation driven by
extreme emotions. With that being said, I can therefore conclude that the second scenario is a
much better response for the conversation, because the first one that is stated do not reflect
effective communication, and thus it does not reach a meaningful ending, considering the
communication is a much greater subject that we should always be careful to perform, and I can
advice 6C’s, an effective communication always comes after reaching upon these factors as
namely: Clearness, Conciseness, Concreteness, Correctness, Coherent, and a Courteous attitude
REFERENCES:
studies/sites/default/files/files/Kaufmann%20Civility%20Part%202-CJPL4-3%20(1).