Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M.P. No /2015: in The 2Nd Court of Ld. S.D.M. (Executive) Magistrate at Howrah
M.P. No /2015: in The 2Nd Court of Ld. S.D.M. (Executive) Magistrate at Howrah
M.P. No………/2015
Vrs.
Suresh Jaiswal
s/o Ramasankar Jaiswal
of 282, G. T. Road, Liluah
and also at 16, Girish Ghosh Road,
Liluah, P. S. –Belur, Distt:- Howrah. …Opposite Party
2. That the petitioner is the owner of premises No. 281/A/2, G. T. Road, Liluah, P.
S.- Belur, District-Howrah and occupying the same for several years.
3. That in front of the petitioner’s main gate there is a common passage which
was generally used by the owners, tenants, occupiers of the building lying and
4. That the petitioner has also a shop room at holding no. 282, G.T.Road, P.S.
Belur, District- Howrah, which is just opposite the main gate of building of
2
petitioner and the said common passage is lying between the said shop and
5. That the said common passage is open space which was due to be used only
for ingress and egress of owners, tenants and occupiers of the said locality but
unfortunately nowadays the said common passage has become the center of
6. That there is/was clean understanding among the owners and occupiers of the
locality not to use the said common passage as personal property and for
7. That sometimes ago some anti-social persons had also threatened the
petitioner with dire consequences if the petitioner dare to raise any objection
8. That the petitioner had also lodged complaint on 17/02/2015 against the
opposite party, who had trespassed and entered in the room of the petitioner
with some anti-social persons and had abused and threatened the petitioner
but in spite of aforesaid complain police had not taken any step to stop such
9. That the petitioner is the old age person, living lonely in his aforesaid building
so he could not muster courage to lodge complaint against any persons for
their illegal activities in spite of repeated abuse and threatening by the op and
10.That on 09/03/2015, when the petitioner came out from his house, he did not
find his bike which was garaged there. The petitioner immediately rushed to
the local police station and narrated the incident but unfortunately the police
did not lodge any complaint and visited the place where the bike was garaged.
Surprisingly at that time there was a bike lying there but the same was not
3
with the petitioner but very surprisingly the said police officer sent the said
vehicle to somewhere and also brought the petitioner’s bike within half an
hour. When the petitioner asked reason of the aforesaid incident the police
Belur Police station and he has also higher approach in ruling party so all time
12.That the op has money and muscle power and he has political approach as
such he takes law in his hands and petitioner compelled to lead his life in
fearful atmosphere.
13.That there is every chance of breach of peace at the instance of the opposite
party who used the anti-socials who gathered over the common passage and
14.That if the restraining order is not granted in favor of the petitioner by this Ld.
15.That there is urgency and emergency to invoke the provision u/s 107 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure to restrain the opposite party, his men and agents
from taking law in their hands and further restrain them to interfere in the
proper.