Madras Miscellany - The Father of Indian Botany - The Hindu

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

      ePaper Search here 

METROPLUS

Madras miscellany: The Father of Indian Botany


S. MUTHIAH SEPTEMBER 28, 2014 17:53 IST
UPDATED:
NOVEMBER 17, 2021 12:05 IST

SHARE ARTICLE        PRINT A A A


The news that the Schmidt Memorial on
Elliot’s Beach was being restored and the
area around it landscaped is welcome
indeed. But while this memorial has kept
alive for several decades memories of the
courage of a young Danish mercantile
executive (Miscellany, September 23,
2013), there have been at least two other
persons with Danish connections in the
city’s past who deserve commemoration
for significant contributions they made
to Madras — and even to India.

John Goldingham was of Danish descent


but was more British than Dane. He was
St. Anthony’s Church, Pudupet. Photo: M.Vedhan the first official head of the oldest
modern observatory in the country and
of the oldest modern technical school in Asia, both surviving to this day. But
better remembered is what was considered his patron Lord Edward Clive’s folly
— or entertainment space. Built by Goldingham to host the Governor’s Council,
this
Assembly Hall became better known as
Banqueting Hall (and should I say
‘Ballroom’?) but today languishes as
Rajaji Hall . Making me wonder how this
splendid building can be revived and given new life.

Goldingham’s contributions may be remembered by a few, but very, very few


outside the scientific community are likely to remember a German who made
Denmark his home and later contributed significantly to India. Dr. Johann
Gerhard König was a Danish-trained physician who served the Madras
Government in the late 18th Century but became better known as ‘The Father
of Indian Botany’, with scientific botany in India emerging through his efforts.

Born in what is now Latvia, König moved to Denmark in 1748 to study and
became a private pupil of Linnaeus at Uppsala University from 1757. He lived
and worked in Denmark till he came out to Tranquebar in 1768 to serve the
Danish Halle Mission as its medical officer. Simultaneously, he worked with the
Nawab of Arcot as his Naturalist and travelled throughout his domain (virtually
what became the Madras Presidency) and Ceylon. In 1778, he was appointed the
East India Company’s first Natural Historian /Naturalist/ Botanist and served in
that capacity till his death near Vizagapatam in 1785. Amongst those who
benefitted from his training them as naturalists were the Rev. Christoph John
and Rev. Johann Rottler in Tranquebar and William Roxburgh in Madras. It was
Roxburgh who treated him during his last days in what is now Andhra Pradesh
when dysentery was felling him.
J. König , a name to reckon with in Indian
botanical terminology, was responsible for South India being the earliest centre
for botanical and zoological research in the country.

Until König came along, plants found in India by the ‘greens’ were sent to
Europe to be classified and described by scientists like Linnaeus and others.
König introduced the Linnaean rules in India and was soon followed by others.
Many of these students of Indian vegetation in the Peninsula and Ceylon, like
James Anderson, Francis Hamilton-Buchanan, Roxburgh, Rottler, and John and
a few others formed a society to promote botanical studies, exchanged
specimens and information on new species collected, and, acting in concert as a
society, named them. But as they became more confident of their botanical
knowledge, some of them began naming their finds themselves without
consultation. All this information was sent by them to European botanists who
published the information under the names sent to them or under names they
had changed the originals to. Later authors of botanical information, like
Edward Balfour and Robert Wight, tended to use the names in general use at the
time, but also offered the synonyms that had been earlier used. One of the
names listed is
Murraya Königii , a species of curry leaves.

Footnote: Searching for material for this column constantly throws up new
leads to follow. And while writing today’s piece I came across the name of Dr.
Francis Appavoo. Here was an Indian who, as early as the 1860s, was in charge of
the Conservator of Forests’ office in Madras. I wonder if anyone can tell me
more about him.

*****

A commitment to restoration

I had met Father Vijay Kiran many years ago in the Archbishopric’s archives and
had been very pleased to meet someone who was more than an administrator,
who was, in fact, a person who valued the riches he was in charge of. When I
heard he had been transferred, I was rather dismayed because it would have
been difficult to find someone who would have appreciated as much as him the
history of the archdiocese. I was therefore delighted when I met him the other
day to find that his interest in the past had led him to becoming a committed
conservationist, now calling on his fellow Roman Catholic clergymen to
maintain, and restore where necessary, their churches.

When I met Fr. Kiran a couple of weeks ago, it was at a viva for his second
doctorate. His thesis this time was
Conservation of Church Architecture
(Buildings) and Their Artifacts in Tamil Nadu , and it was an excellent
presentation that he made of it, ending with an appeal to parish priests to
ensure regular maintenance of their churches and restoration of them if they
were heritage buildings. Towards this end, he urged the support of the
archdioceses.

After the presentation, I was rather surprised when an elderly, rather well-
spoken man, who I got the impression was a retired priest, wondered whether it
was really necessary to restore old churches when it was so much less expensive
to build new ones to suit the congregations of today. He had me wondering
whether, with his obviously cultured background, he really appreciated the
cinematic elements that have been creeping into representations in many
churches, whether all new churches had to sport St. Peter’s domes, and whether,
if heritage was not particularly important, the leaders of faiths for hundreds of
years should be forsaken for new messiahs.

Be that as it may, what was particularly pleasing was to hear that Fr. Kiran had
during his three-year parish priesthood at St. Anthony’s, Pudupet, collected
over Rs. 25 lakh to restore that 80-plus-year-old church using the best possible
conservation practices that he had read about and heard of from a few
conservationists. With this knowledge he had supervised the entire work — and
now it only needed regular maintenance to retain its attention-drawing
appearance.

There is a tradition that the French Capuchins had ministered to the needs of
the rather impoverished Roman Catholics of Pudupet before it became the
parish of Pudupet in 1873, a part of the then Archdiocese of Mylapore. Fr. Y.
Arulappa was appointed parish priest in 1909 and was to hold the post for the
next 20 years. It was during his tenure that the Church of St. Anthony of Padua,
the church restored by Fr. Kiran, was built, being consecrated in September
1927. Starting a collection drive in October 1920, Fr. Arulappa had funds enough
by the end of the year to have the confidence to invite a papal dignitary to lay
the foundation in January 1921. But collecting the funds to finish the work was
a slow process.

Priests who succeeded Fr. Arulappa embellished the church over the years that
followed — a pale wooden altar was replaced by a gleaming ebony one, the
interior was painted and improved with paintings, and other elements of
beauty were added. All those and the building itself have now been restored —
an example for the nearly 1,200 Catholic churches in Tamil Nadu, about 375 of
which date to before 1947 and considered by Fr. Kiran, who visited and listed all
of them for his thesis, as heritage churches. He hopes his lead will be followed
in other States and by other denominations. For me, it was great to find a
fellow-enthusiast for heritage.

******

When the postman knocked…

* Does John Pereira’s Garden still exist and, if so, where, wonders reader
Raymond Pereira. I don’t know whether my correspondent is a descendant of
John Pereira, but I can only disappoint him. To the best of my knowledge, the
garden, once a small coconut
thope at the southwest extremity of
Peddanaickenpet, in the vicinity of where the General Hospital was developed,
no longer exists, being completely built over. It belonged originally to Joao
Pereira de Faria (John Pereira), a prosperous merchant of Negapatam
(Nagapattinam), who fled the Dutch occupation and re-settled in Madras in
1660 with a house in White Town (Fort St. George). The Fort had 118 houses
within it at the time, 79 of them belonging to Portuguese merchants and
employees of the East India Company. Pereira’s daughter Escolastica married
Cosmo Lourenco Madera (or Madeiros) who built the Descanco Church on St.
Mary’s Road, Mylapore. Their son, the merchant-seafarer Luis Madera, was the
owner of the garden house that his widow Antonia Madeiros sold to Governor
Saunders and which became the nucleus of
Government House , so rudely
pulled down not so long ago to build a new legislature that has now been
transformed into a hospital.

* My reference the other day to the statue of Rev. G.U. Pope on the Marina (
>Miscellany, September 8 ), had K.V. Iyer asking me whether I knew that Pope
owed his Tamil scholarship to Ramanuja Kavirayar. Not only did I not know
that, but I must confess that I had not heard of Pope’s guru. I did, however, go a-
digging and found that this Ramanathapuram-born scholar was in his thirties
when he come to Madras in 1820 and began bringing out in print for the first
time the Tamil classics with commentaries. But simultaneously he began
gaining a reputation as an outstanding teacher of Tamil. Among his pupils were
Pope (who acknowledged him as “my first teacher of Tamil”), the Rev. Myron
Winslow, the Rev. W.H. Drew and the Rev. C.T. Rhenius. He helped Winslow with
his English-Tamil dictionary and Drew with his translation of the
Thirukkural
into English. The other two missionaries also owed much to his advice for the
literary works they produced. But from all accounts, despite his contribution to
Tamil literature, Ramanuja Kavirayar was best known as an outstanding scholar
and teacher.

Our code of editorial values

This article is closed for comments.


Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Apr 22, 2022 7:34:11 am |


https://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/Madras-miscellany-The-
Father-of-Indian-Botany/article56844885.ece

© THG PUBLISHING PVT LTD.

You might also like