Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
This tool can be especially useful in helping patients identify areas for growth in how
they respond to their emotions, especially those with Borderline Personality Disorder,
Generalised Anxiety Disorder or Substance Use Disorder.
If the DERS is administered twice or more NovoPsych will graph scores over time,
indicating the progress the respondent has made during treatment.
During development of the scale it was found that the DERS had high internal
consistency, good test–retest reliability, and adequate construct and predictive
validity (Gratz & Roemer, 2003).
The means and standard deviations for the sample are presented below.
Scores are presented as a total score as well as a score for each of the 6 subscales.
Higher scores suggest greater problems with emotion regulation.
Scores are also presented as a percentile rank, which compares the respondent’s
scores against adults seeking outpatient psychological therapy (Hallion et al., 2018).
A percentile of 50 indicates typical scores in comparison to others presenting for
treatment, with higher scores indicating more severe problems. Percentiles are the
preferred method for interpretation given they contextualise scores via comparison to
peers.
SUBSCALES:
5. Limited access to emotion regulation strategies: 15, 16, 22R, 28, 30, 31,
35, 36
Reflects the belief that there is little one can do to regulate oneself once upset
While higher scores on the sub-scales are indicative of more emotion regulation
problems, higher scores are also predictive of bigger treatment gains from CBT. This
suggests that emotion regulation is a key skill that can be learnt during therapy and
mastering these skills is a an important mechanism for symptom reduction in
successful treatment.