1

Chapter 3 – Ucadia Law Series

The Law Explained: Session 3 – Estates, Rolls and Registers

There is a great deal of information to get through tonight during Session 3 on

“Estates, Rolls and Registers”. Because there is a lot to get through, you might want
to re-read this session as well as previous sessions a few times so you get a better
comprehension of these absolutely essential and fundamental concepts.

By this stage, there may be some of you desperately wanting me to start talking in
terms of practical applications for this kind of information, namely how to address a
foreclosure matter, or an action to recover some kind of debt, or how to resolve a
criminal or civil matter? In truth, if you have been reading and listening carefully, I
have actually been providing common sense and valuable and practical information
throughout this series. For example, you see, every court case before a Western-
Roman Court has one or more trust elements in its design, usually at least one Inferior
Private Trust as a Fraud Trust and at least one Inferior Personal Trust as a Bond Trust.
Why do you think they call the accusations against you charges? The problem in
diving into cutting and pasting claimed letters or forms or notices that people may be
trying to “sell you” on the internet before you have any comprehension on trusts or
rights or any of the fundamentals is that not only can you get it horribly wrong, but
without competence you cannot possibly overcome, no matter what false promises
that people want to sell you and you may be wanting to purchase.

Everything we are discussing now, such as trusts and rights and tonight on estates,
rolls and registers will become overwhelmingly critical when we start to speak “step
by step” and one issue at a time on practical help on the matters you may be facing.
For example, I just mentioned to you that virtually every Western-Roman Court case
involves at least two trust elements. In coming weeks, I will be explaining exactly
what that means; and why many of the legal officers of the courts have no idea of this
anymore because it has become automated and centralized. So for the time being, I
urge you to persist and to continue to get your mind around these fundamental
concepts of The Law Explained.

As I have said every week now, if you have a sound foundation, and if you can grasp
the essence of what was defined last week in Session 2 on Trusts and Rights and then
in Session 1 on the Fundamental Truths of Law, and the previous week on the 144
Truths of Law, then it is entirely reasonable and achievable that you will be able to
quickly grasp and be empowered by the topics discussed tonight on Estates, Rolls and
Registers; and the topics yet to come in relation to wills and testaments, writs,
affidavits, evidence, court cases, overcoming debts, foreclosures and many other key
topics.

Similar to each week so far, there are charts that summarize the concepts and points
we will be discussing tonight.

Before we start Session 3 tonight, I want to review some of the exciting comments I
mentioned last week in the fact that a new range of services are going to become
available for Ucadia Members in the proper registration and recording in the Ucadia
Gazette of key forms for your properly formed trusts and estates in the coming weeks.
 2

I also mentioned that availability of and fair use of these services will depend upon
three essential criteria being (1) a commitment to becoming competent, and to change
your attitude, and accept responsibility, and to dedicate yourself to a life of learning;
and (2) that you have read the key instruments of Ucadia, have redeemed your
member number and have completed the soon to be available revised Ecclesiastical
Deed Poll. This instrument is not yet available. I have not yet posted it. However, the
document will be posted in the coming short period as I have promised it will be
ready; and (3) that you read carefully the services and any administration fees
associated with the checking and work involved prior to uploading such instruments.
Similar to the Ecclesiastical Deed Poll, I have not yet uploaded the list of services and
administration fees yet, as I am in the process of updating the websites to reflect this
new information and it is taking a little longer. I know many of you are probably keen
to see this happen as soon as possible, yet reading and reviewing these sessions is still
vital, so I thank you for your patience.

I also want to mention the point I raised last week in honour of the “general amnesty”
declared in respect of those who have previously been stealing pieces of Ucadia or
misusing such information or selling remedies and solutions that are not quite
accurate. Last week I mentioned that for those people willing to be truly competent in
knowledge of law and stop making false assertions and false claims, then a service
will be available within the next few weeks called an “Advocate of the Golden Rule”
or Advocatus Aureus Iuris.

As I mentioned, an Advocatus or Advocate of the Golden Rule of Law, also known

as a Superior Advocate of Law is someone who has passed the validation process
with Ucadia, is duly registered with Ucadia and on the Ucadia Gazette and so is then
able to help others, knowing their competence is properly recognized, even if pirates
still refuse to recognize the Rule of Law. Furthermore, an Advocate will be able to
facilitate the registration and recording in the Ucadia Gazette of documents at a
schedule of fees at a greatly reduced rate of one quarter the standard direct rates,
simply because such Advocates of Law will be able to guide those people directly.
The competency requirements and forms to be recognized as an Advocate of the
Golden Rule of Law will also be available over the next few weeks through this
series. Again, to those of you who may qualify for such recognition, please be patient
with me and allow me to finish the updates reflecting these changes whilst you review
the material associated with these sessions.

Finally, I want to extend the deepest expression of thanks and gratitude to those of
you that cognize the enormous value of the information being shared with everyone at
no cost, in being considerate and honourable enough to donate to Ucadia and support
these efforts. Not only does your kind support and donations prove that there are
conscious and competent people across the planet as more and more “wake up”, but
your willingness to help support Ucadia in a tangible way is making a real difference.
So while there remains thousands and indeed millions of people unaware of Ucadia,
or too distracted or unwilling to donate and contribute to Ucadia, I want to thank each
and everyone of you who do contribute and remind me each day that there are truly
people who do care and do want to see positive change on this planet.

Let us start then on the series tonight, beginning with a quick summary of what we
have learned from Session 2 and some further key concepts that underpin our ability
 3

to cognize Estates, Rolls and Registers as Part #1 being a “Quick Review on Key
Concepts”.

In Session 2 and the outline of Trusts and Rights, I provided some significant detail as
to the truth of your incredible potential within the form of flesh within the universal
Dream. I also demonstrated evidence that proves “in plain sight” how the elite
Pisan/Venetian as well as Dutch and English families view you compared to
themselves. I also discussed with you the nature of your Rights and the design and
structure of Trusts and why the only viable solution for your Rights and Trusts is
through Ucadia. There were numerous other insights that can be gained from Session
2. However, in remaining relevant to the topic today on Estates, Rolls and Registers,
let me summarize then some of the key insights you hopefully gained from Session 2,
as shown on the above chart, namely; that;

There has been no proper society under Rule of Law for more than 400 years;

While there is no true Rule of Law, the Roman System depends on “illusion of Law”
for its existence;

The Western-Roman Model is a Mind Prison designed to shut people down;

There is “no way out” of the Western-Roman Model except Ucadia;

The elite Pisan/Venetian and Dutch/English families view themselves as Gods and the
rest of the people as slaves;
 4

Public Law is Roman Trust Law. Private Law is the Law of Piracy, dressed up as
Admiralty Law;

The highest Rights and Trusts are Ucadia. Roman Rights and Trusts are Inferior;

Ucadia will help you prove your Rights & Trusts in coming weeks via Ucadia
Register & Gazette;

Before these services are made available, you need to read and comprehend these
notes;

Remedy via Ucadia is only available to those people willing to change their attitude
and accept responsibility;

As we are speaking about Estates, Rolls and Registers and the notion of property, it is
vitally important to reacquaint ourselves with the abhorrent and morally repugnant
concept of Original Sin as introduced in the 17th Century but claimed to being within
scripture and a dogma of Christianity for centuries earlier.
The above chart shows the general principles of Original Sin as first introduced,
namely it is a purely commercial term associated with forming a false legal argument
to steal the rights of the people. It begins with the notion that Heaven can be viewed
like some giant Venetian banking ledger of credits versus debits and that these
columns of spiritual values must balance in heaven as well as on Earth.
Let me put it another way – any man or woman or preacher that accepts as valid the
notion of Sin as taught by the various commercial churches today, is basically saying
that either the Divine Creator is a Venetian Accountant or the God(s) in the Bible
really are Venetian Banking Families as I showed you last week. In any event, if you
really and sincerely feel that Heaven is completely pre-occupied with medieval Pisan
and Venetian and later Dutch and English banking and piracy terms, then I am afraid
you remain deeply affected by the Mundi Mind Virus keeping you enslaved in their
system. Another example is in the earliest surviving dictionaries of English such as
 5

Bailey’s Etymological Dictionary that in 1675 stated the meaning of the word Belief
is Credit as a commercial term and Credit is Belief. I mean, when they were rolling
this system out at the end of the 17th Century, they didn’t hide it from their own
people who had access to such texts. It was clear it was about a purely pirate
commercial system to enslave the world.

So looking at the diagram, you have in Venetian heaven the idea that Sin is a Divine
Debt offset by the Blood of the Martyrs from the Treasury of Heaven. Then on Earth,
the ritual of Confession and Penance is evidence of the debt or guilt, with the
Indulgence, or Dispensation being the Monetization of that debt or guilt to discharge
it. If this still does not make sense, do not worry as I will be returning to these
concepts as we continue through the series and address more accounting elements,
particularly in the formation of assets and money.

For the moment, I want you to now look at above chart and notice the planning that
happened in the 17th and 18th Centuries, predominantly centered around the Hanover
Kings of Great Britain and then later the Pisan and Venetian and Dutch and English
elite families that sought to reinforce their claim and position. What happened once
the European wars had worked through and Great Britain had proven itself to be the
greatest center of elite liars and pirates and psychopaths the planet had ever seen, was
that these pirate families wanted even more control in their alliance with Rome as the
Jus Patronatus or the “sole patron”.
The concept of “Original Sin” was the perfect mechanism as it was also connected to
a much more subtle offset of philosophy whereby Mary was championed as the
Queen of Heaven and without sin. No public mention or debate then was covered as
to the other alleged siblings or family members of Jesus Christ and this is where the
elite families got busy creating fake genealogies to usurp more then 5,000 years of
detailed history of the tens of thousands of descendants of the Holly (Cuilliaéan)
priest-kings around the planet. If you want to know the true genealogies of history,
then please read Lebor Clann Glas.
 6

So what these pirate families did was hire false scribes to go and create these
nonsensical and absurd genealogies that claimed the Hanover's and then later the
merchant banking families were descended from Charlemagne and then from
Charlemagne back through to Jacob, the brother of Jesus. They even created fake
Jewish kingdoms in Spain in order to make sure all the elite members could claim to
be descended from Mary and thus “born without sin”.
For the rest of the world, born in Original Sin, this horribly insane and criminal
philosophy converted them into “sheeple” as sinning people without rights. The only
people then who were allowed to own land were those “without sin” and therefore
these elite families through the fake creation of allodial title.
By the way, if you have ever wanted to know what the most valuable treasures stored
within the oldest banks of Switzerland are, then now you know. It is not bars of gold
or ancient paintings, it is old fake genealogies, claiming certain people were
descendants of the Holly or Cuilliaéan, when in fact they haven’t known anything
about the true descendants of Yahusia and the last of the Great Prophets of Yeb until
now. This, by the way, is the origin of the English Monarch claiming to be a God
King or God Queen – as one born without sin in a world of sinners. The fact that the
Aristocracy still refuse to acknowledge the Holly, even though the Holy See is
literally named after the Holly, is yet another example that the lies and fakery of these
people has been built upon complete and total ignorance.

So what this means to you is really highlighted on the above chart where I show the
diagram of the multiple ringed prison of the mind again, only the labels for the rings
now are the words Delinquent, Insolvent, Ignorant and Recalcitrant. As we move
forward in these series, these words and the false imputations that led to them being
asserted will be more and more important.
 7

Let me explain. Delinquency is the assumed sin when you appear at court, that you
are the one, not the trustee or the other party, that has been neglectful in your duties
and obligations. Of course, if the administrators and surrogate trustees within the
system fail to provide crucial information to you, or fail to provide proper accounting
to you, leading to a default on your part, then who ultimately is the first cause? It is
them – not you. Yet the presumption in their system when you are charged is that it is
your fault first.

Let us take the notion of insolvency as another wall of the prison that is particularly
important for private commercial law. If you are deemed insolvent, then it is assumed
you have no real assets or security. Given that admiralty law is all about insurance and
security, being claimed insolvent means you are immediately placed at a disadvantage
whenever a controversy is raised, as you appearing at one of their courts without
representation can easily be assumed as abandoned cargo, without security and
immediately bailed into one of their warehouses as a surety against a debt. This notion
of insolvency of course is yet another abomination that flies in the face of the
Declaration of Independence and even the Bible itself, that both express we each
possess unalienable rights. If you possess such priceless rights, then it is impossible to
argue you could ever be an insolvent debtor. How do they get away with it? - By
convincing people to be complete and utter idiots and sheeple in believing in
“Original Sin”.

Now the next three charts provide a clearer explanation of the accounting methods
underpinning this awful system, starting with the above chart showing the
introduction of the monetization of sin model that still underpins the modern financial
currency system of the world today. I won’t spend too much time on each of these
charts as we will run out of time in getting to the meat of our discussion about Estates,
Rolls and Registers.
 8

So have a look at the chart above and you see how the system continued to modify
itself over the ages, now with the notion of bills or money being the offset against
rights.

Then on the above chart you see the global banking model that we live under today
where modern currencies are underwritten by the pledge of the sweat labour of the
population as slaves. However, as the diagram shows, in the last thirty years, the
private agencies and owners that purchased government services and assets now no
longer want to balance the accounting to provide the necessary “benefits” to the
people as slaves. They want to make bigger profits and in many ways let the people
 9

starve. Not only is this notion, morally repugnant, but also is absolutely suicidal
thinking as it has completely destroyed the fabric of Western-Roman Commerce,
otherwise called Capitalism. Again, we will speak in more detail about this in coming
weeks.

Being mindful of time, I want to address another subject before we get into more
detail on Estates, Rolls and Registers and prove to all that are listening that there is
absolutely no remedy in Common law, and that if you hear someone persisting with
being an island and ignoring the general amnesty of Ucadia, to keep using such words
as “equity”, the above chart shows the danger of such words.
You see, the above chart shows that the word Equity is actually a signpost leading
back to the Inner Temple as the Court of Chancery. Thus, anyone who claims there is
any form of relief within Equity, even if they are a senior judge, really is ignorant of
what is hidden in plain sight in the symbol of Pegasus, the horse or “equis” in Latin as
the root of the word equity. I mean, they could not make it more blatantly obvious,
could they?
 10

This leads me to yet another graphic to keep in mind with what we are dealing with as
shown on the above chart and the fact that English Law has been burnt and re-written
many times. This week was the claimed 800th anniversary of the Magna Carta – a
document claimed as the foundation stone of Common Law, but in truth an instrument
where no single clause has any current force or effect in Statute law in the United
Kingdom, much less any other Western-Roman realms whatsoever.
As for English Statutes and Great Britain statutes forming the basis of claimed
“Common Law”, the truth is that there have been numerous documented fires
throughout history that completely obliterated and turned to ash the historic records of
law in England. To argue that it was somehow recreated accurately by inference is
one of the biggest lies in the history of creating fake documents. You can see it for
yourself in the parts of Scottish statutes that did survive and in looking at the language
of claimed statutes in England – proving without question that the legal scholars of
the Four Inns of Court pretty much made up whatever they felt was important, when
re-writing English History in the 17th Century, then again in the 18th Century and
again in the 19th Century and the 20th Century.
I am one of the few people alive today to have actually read carefully the tens of
thousands of claimed statutes of Westminster from the time of the Magna Carta until
the 20th Century and I can assure you that if you have the years of time to study them,
you would see that contrary to the notion that such statutes are a glorious
Constitution, such works are deliberately obscure, contradictory, infused with words
and terms that didn’t exist when the alleged statute was supposed to have been
promulgated and obsessed in the commercial advantages for a very, very few people.
So, we have addressed, I feel, some pretty important fundamentals that contribute to a
better comprehension of the environment behind the formation of Estates, and what
exactly are Rolls and Registers. It is now time to look at the nature, structure, function
and importance of Estates.
 11

One of the key messages from Session 2 last week on Rights and Trusts is that in law,
your Rights are always in some form of trust relation and are connected to one or
more persons. Let us have a look at the above chart as an example.

Your access to Rights is through a particular person. It is the person that is connected
to the rights, not the physical you. As we have discussed before, the physical “you”
cannot hold an intangible concept such as rights. However, a person can. Instead, the
physical “you” is connected to one or more persons by virtue of the attributes and
likeness of the person and ultimately by agreement and consent.

Take a look at the above chart for another perspective on what we have been
discussing, namely that if you live in any modern Western-Roman society, then the
physical “you” will be connected to multiple “persons” as normal.

In one system of registers and rolls, you will probably be listed as a State Citizen of
the state where you were registered at the time you were born. That is one form of
unique person. Similarly, you may well be registered as a Federal Citizen of the
country sharing similar boundaries with the state of your birth, usually by choosing to
vote, or take up some kind of federal benefits or some other agreement.

Yet, the physical “you” is also likely to be associated with many other potential
persons such as being a “government benefits recipient” or a “registered taxpayer” or
a “licensed driver” or even a “defendant” or “plaintiff” in a court matter.
 12

The point I am trying to make here is that each of these many instances is a
completely unique person, claimed in one sense to be the property of the government
department or agency or corporation that formed it. They may have very similar or
even identical sounding and looking names, but please do not be tricked into thinking
they are all one same person. Anyone that says or claims “you are the person” in
“believing” you only have one person for your entire set of relations within society is
either lying or is completely misguided.

Now, it is not just the fact that our “physical selves” are almost certainly connected to
multiple persons, but the fact that each of these persons may also be of a different
type, based on the three aspects of person we have discussed in the previous sessions.

Take a look at the above chart for an example to see what I mean. By three aspects, I
am referring to the application of the notion of 1st person, 2nd person and 3rd person
in practice. This time, let us look at these three aspects in terms of the role of the
trustee as 1st person, also known as the principal, when the beneficiary is named.
Then, let us view the 2nd person as the named beneficiary and therefore the agent;
and finally the 3rd person as the “res” or “thing” as a form of property and beneficial
right of use, for the one holding some kind of certificate.

To the right hand side, you see the labels used in instruments to formally identify
what type of relation of a person that a physical self may claim to be connected,
whether it be propria persona as 1st person, or agentis juris as agent of the principal as
2nd person, or someone, who in complete ignorance, claiming to be “pro se” as short
for “pro se in rem” or declaring in a court that “I am a thing”, as third person.
 13

The above chart gives us a different context when we look at these three aspects and
three types of persons in relation to a classic Trust structure. So what we are saying
then is that for all those different types of persons we listed (3 charts up), there are 3
possible aspects being 1st person, 2nd person and 3rd person; or trustee, beneficiary
and beneficial interest; or principal, agent and thing.
Think about this for a second, because, I hope you see this is a critically important
notion to consider whenever you have tried to make sense of where you stand in
relation to the different types of persons as listed (3 charts up). For example, in the
case of being a holder of a birth certificate, our association may only be as a 3rd
person, or as a thing. Or in the case of a passport, we are definitely only holding the
status of res and a thing as a 3rd person. Or in the case of a driver’s license, we may
hold two levels of status, the first being as a registered driver as a 2nd person and the
second level being the holder of a driver’s license as a 3rd person.
 14

The above chart hopefully makes this even clearer. So in the case of a 1st person, such
association is proven by a properly executed and recorded Deed that is associated
with the Trust, or a Certificate of Deed if the Trust is registered in a foreign
jurisdiction, such as a Superior Ucadian Trust being recognized by an Inferior
Western-Roman Court.

In the case of a 2nd person, such association is proven by a properly executed, signed
and recorded Letter such as a Letter of Appointment or Letter of Commission such as
a Letter of Attorney; or if such appointment is done in a foreign jurisdiction such as
Ucadia, then a Certificate of Appointment is needed for recording into an Inferior
Western-Roman Court.

In the case then of a 3rd person, such association is proven by possession of a

properly sealed and numbered certificate, corresponding to an entry in some register
of such rights. For example a birth certificate or a passport or a certificate of driver’s
license or share certificate are all examples.

What does this mean then? Well, it means that you cannot simply go into an Inferior
Roman Court and claim yourself propria persona, when (a) you did not create the trust
and (b) the only association you can possibly hold in the primary trust is as a thing, or
“pro se in rem”. To claim otherwise is to proclaim yourself ignorant of the law, and
therefore an idiot, and automatically incapacitated. You have just kicked an “own
goal” by such stupidity.

What is another revelation from the above chart? Well, take the idea of where we
might potentially hold two different forms of relation, being as an agent or
beneficiary; and secondly as the holder of a beneficial interest “in rem”. A driver’s
license is a classic example of this. Insurance is against the registered driver on their
computer systems. You don’t need to hold any form of driver’s license to prove you
are a valid registered driver, just sufficient identification to enable a police officer to
establish your identity.

So why do they insist on demanding to see you produce and hold a valid driver’s
license? For two key reasons: Firstly, because the Police Officer is a private
contractor working for a private corporation of debt collectors and bounty hunters
masquerading as a proper court. They are claiming the position as agents in order to
create a person. Secondly, because they automatically need you to be charged “in
rem” as a thing and as a “holder” of beneficial interest and not in any agent or
beneficiary capacity if they are going to make money off of you. This is because it
becomes a purely commercial pirate transaction, without the need to prove injured
party. It is a contract agreement, based on you – the holder, as the res or “thing” – not
contesting the letter of demand, being the summons or ticket produced by the police
officer.

As I have said, we will speak in more detail on these specific insights as we move
through the series on a case-by-case basis. But before you think to jump off and start
ignoring the production of your driver’s license when a police officer pulls you over,
please consider the fact that I have been reinforcing throughout this series and that is
that a police officer today, just like an attorney today, or a court clerk today or even
judges today, know far less about the law than at any other time in Western-Roman
 15

history – because ignorance of the law has become part of the defense of the system
as “plausible deniability”. There is absolutely no benefit in trying to argue with a
police officer, as it most likely will make matters manifestly worse.

Like I showed in session 1, there is a massive cognitive dissonance across all aspects
of the legal and judicial system in most countries where what a police officer thinks
he or she knows, compared to the “public view” is completely wrong, when compared
to the truth of the statutes and laws. The first people to whom they lie are their own
and it makes any attempt to teach the law on the fly, during a traffic stop a very
dangerous and often stupid course of action. So please be patient and let us get
through this series in a step-by-step basis, and we will address all these cases and
issues many of you are facing or have faced.

The above chart now reveals for the first time the clarity of exactly what is a valid
Estate record being a Record in a Roll, creating a person with associated Rights.
There it is, hidden in plain sight! An Estate being created when a record is duly
entered or “enrolled” in a special type of Register called a “Roll”. The owner of the
Roll then retains the right to the legal title of the person and then the appointment of
any surrogate or trustee as principal, called an executor or administrator.

The owner of the Roll then grants as privilege to one or more other persons the benefit
and/or beneficial interest in the 2nd person and 3rd person and any associated rights in
trust. So if we take the classic example of a Remainder Estate, also known as a
Residential Estate, then we see once a Roman State registers the baby in a Roll, it
creates three persons, holding one for itself, while the other two persons may be used
by someone else. In the case of corporations operating and pretending to be proper
estates since the 1930’s the role of the agent or 2nd person of birth certificates has
been hijacked by the banking cartels under the claim of perpetual bankruptcy, leaving
only beneficial interest or 3rd person, via holders of birth certificates.
 16

Let me put that another way – what I just said is that the very fact your local state
hands you a birth certificate, is prima facie evidence that the only rights the state
claims you have in your name, or your body, or your mind or your soul is as a 3rd
person, or a thing, being less than a slave. They can argue all they like in ignorance to
the contrary. The evidence of a Birth Certificate or piece of plastic is irrefutable
evidence of this fact. The very point that a clerk or registrar in births, deaths and
marriages hasn’t got a clue about this is also proof of just how ignorant, delusional
and incapacitated their entire apparatus has become in relation to the administration of
pseudo law and pseudo justice.

In contrast, your Live Borne Record as derived from your redeemed membership in
Ucadia is proof of first in time and first in line and that you, yes you are the principal
of a True Estate as the Office of Man or Office of Woman and no inferior and false
system of pirate law can claim otherwise. The only way they can succeed is if they get
enough paid and insane government agents out there to try and convince people not to
support Ucadia and not redeem their member numbers, while they do it for
themselves. Why? You see under the Western-Roman System, not even a judge is
free.

The above chart reveals another potential “failsafe” within the Western-Roman
System and the notion that the creation of persons and therefore estates via rolls is
hierarchical. Thus, the Roman Death Cult has by tradition, acted as a kind of licensor
to permit others to claim the names and bodies and minds of others as property, then
within estates, or states. Legislative authority via statutes and validated by elections is
also a source of such authority. Then finally, corporate authority is claimed as a
franchisee of such claimed rights of states via their bylaws, such as the US Codes for
example. However, corporations still need consent in order to validate such persons
being created, and this is ultimately the only reason they still need warm bodies to
appear in courts. Thanks to technology, of course, this need is diminishing as video
 17

footage at time of arrest or charge or claim is making the system more automated,
especially for lesser alleged crimes.

Yet as we show on the above chart, no matter what the Inferior Western-Roman
Courts and Legislatures claim, the highest Roll and Register is the Great Register of
One Heaven as the only Divine Roll accessible through this temporal plain as the
Ucadia Register and the Ucadia Gazette also as the True Rolls. Then there are the
Superior and Juridic Rolls and Registers of Ucadia communities; and then finally at
the very bottom are the Inferior Rolls and Registers of the Western-Roman world.

So as much as a clerk or registrar or judge may like you to “believe” that you are less
than a slave and nothing more than a “thing” in their court room, to those of you who
have finally awakened and redeemed your member number and have your Live Borne
Record as proof of first in time and first in line, then you know all the claims of
inferior Western-Roman Law are a lie.

By the way, just because I have mentioned Live Borne Record and court in the same
breath, please do not make the mistake of filing such valuable instruments directly
into a court case. Not only is that explicitly forbidden in accord with the sacred
Covenant Pactum De Singularis Caelum, but it is a lazy and ignorant act that
dishonors this knowledge and proclaims you are delinquent in two systems – both
Ucadia and the Western-Roman System. Instead, I will address court issues as we
progress through this series. For now, please be clear, you should never, ever file
directly into a Western-Roman Court your Live Borne Record, unless you want to
declare to the entire Universe you are a complete idiot.
 18

Given we are speaking about filing and registering and recording, I want to finish
Session 3 tonight by speaking briefly about Registers and Rolls in more detail.

The above chart summarizes some key points concerning Registers. If you want to
know more about Registers and Rolls, then go and read the Canons of Fiduciary Law
on the site One-Heaven.Org in more detail. For now, let me read the key points listed
on the above chart.

+ A register as a table contains at least six or more columns being a (a) unique record
number; and (b) action and subject; and (c) time of action; (d) place of action; and (e)
witness who attests to the event; and (f) the name of the registrar making the entry;
and;

+ A register as a table can be a section of a book or a whole series of books; and;

+ All registers by definition are ecclesiastical property; and;

+ A particular action or event can only be recorded once in the same valid Register.
Where two records exist for the same property, it is called clouded title or contested
title; and;

+ The Trustee holding custody of a Register is called a Registrar, or Recorder or

Clerk.
 19

The above chart then summarizes what is a Record. In the interest of time and the fact
that I have already referred you to the Canons of Fiduciary Law for more information,
let me summarize the key points listed:
+ A Record is the memorial of the rituals of Recording an Event, as well as the
summary facts themselves. The facts alone, without the proper procedure, even if
entered into a Register, does not make a valid Record; and
In other words, a Record is the memoralization of the rituals and events of recording
an event, not simply the facts of the event itself. This is a sometimes subtle, but a
critically important distinction. The deed and affidavit and other instruments are the
actual memorialization of the event. The record is merely a summary of the core facts
from these documents, but also a validation that some basic protocols and quality
checking has been followed.
+ A Record comprises five essential actions, entered into four separate books, being
(1) Recording the Memorandum or Deed being facts of the event; and (2) Entering an
Affidavit of Witness to the Event as proof of the event; and (3) Conveying the facts
and proof into the main Register; and (4) Transferring the record number into a
Register of Certificates; and (5) Delivering the Certificate as Instrument of Record
and Proof of Acknowledgment; and
+ All records by definition are ecclesiastical property.
 20

Now in coming weeks, we will be discussing more and more the elements of
instruments, as well as the detail behind proper conveyance of titles and rights.
However, in using the above chart as an example, I want to really focus on the
difference between registering original instruments such as Deeds, Affidavits and
Certificates in a system, versus having actual evidence in the form of types of
Certificates as proof that such instruments have been duly registered in another
jurisdiction.

This is extremely important as the very nature of Registration is by its definition, the
recognition of a transfer or receiving of certain rights to another, or from another. If
you place original deeds, or affidavits into the existing Western-Roman System, then
you are automatically granting rights and use of such instruments – to empower them
to enclose such instruments and choose to provide or not provide any associated
benefits.

However, when these sorts of documents have been properly registered within Ucadia
on the Ucadia Register and published on the Ucadia Gazette, then you need extracts
of Certificates to this effect, rather than any originals of such documents to be placed
within a lesser Western-Roman System. Effectively, the Certificate “tells” the clerk
that an existing record has already been created – For example, the critical importance
of a Certificate of Exemplification when dealing with the recording of authentic
transcripts and copies of instruments into a foreign jurisdiction as evidence.

This leads me to the second last chart of this lecture, being the concept of validation
and the fact that an instrument must be accepted as authentic for it to be entered into a
record. As listed, there are two types of validation between foreign jurisdictions being
Exemplification and Apostille; and two types of validation within an existing
jurisdiction being between Authentication and Certification.
 21

I want to end on the above chart, because it highlights once again so much of the
miscommunication, misunderstanding and just plain wrong information concerning
how instruments may or may not be accepted into foreign jurisdictions as evidence.

Since the Apostille Treaty first came into effect in 1961, there has been a steady
increase in the number of countries using this form of validation to where
approximately 108 nations are signatories as of 2015. So pervasive has this method of
validating documents between nations become, that many people both within and
outside of the legal fraternity have forgotten the original and still functional method of
validation called Exemplification.

Unlike Apostille or Authentication, the process of Exemplification requires that those

attesting to the authenticity of the instrument also provide their designated credentials
and validate their authority, as part of the validation process as having the delegated
powers and authority to make, seal and/or sign the Certificate of Exemplification.

I will discuss Certificates of Exemplification in more detail when we discuss the

services of Ucadia in coming weeks.

So there it is– A detailed analysis and explanation in breaking down the confusion and
uncertainties as to Estates; as well as the function of Registers and Rolls. As with the
previous sessions, I hope you find session 3 to be both useful and interesting.

Source: http://blog.ucadia.com/2015/06/the-law-explained-session-3-estates.html