Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sanchez Hayven Final Draft 3-2-22
Sanchez Hayven Final Draft 3-2-22
Sanchez Hayven Final Draft 3-2-22
Hayven Sanchez
Professor Hugetz
ENGL 1301-IN
28 February 2022
Final Draft
Sex Trafficking in America documentary was made in the year of 2019. The creator of
this documentary is Jezza Neumann, and she published this video on Frontline PBS. This
documentary tells stories of young women who have been abducted and sex trafficked. The
documentary also presents research that has been done to see if more sex trafficking cases
happen during special events such as holidays and super bowls. It is stated in the documentary
that “Around any kind of large sporting event traffickers bring out their victims.” (3:24
Neumann, 2019). Not many women are able to share the important details of their cases, but
there was one young girl who was able to give hotel names and numbers. The documentary
shows how scared women are to speak on their cases. The more details that the detectives are
given then the faster it is to solve sex trafficking cases. Although Sex Trafficking in America tries
to inform that sex trafficking has always been a problem but is now rising in case numbers, bias
revealed through limited perspectives, lack of credibility, and word connotations which
persuades the audience to believe that sex trafficking cases have gone up through time.
Throughout the documentary you were able to see limit perspectives due to it only
showing one side of the case. There is only so much that these women want to share when being
interrogated about their case and trafficker. It is challenging to get useful evidence on the men
who sex traffic women. Due to the limited suspects and evidence, we are presented with limited
Sanchez 2
perspectives which shows cases are rising due to no one attempting to stop traffickers. Therefore,
detectives have created this documentary to catch men in the act of sex trafficking. To catch
them in the act detectives disguise themselves and do “Undercover work on the streets.” (31:31
Neumann, 2019). The detectives would go up to parked cars and ask men “What are you looking
for?” (31:34 Neumann, 2019), and they would respond with “Sex.” (31:36 Neumann, 2019).
Detectives were presented with no evidence and very limited perspectives that they had to go and
do the work to make a change in the world. The detectives rented a hotel to lead traffickers into
meeting up with them which they called it “A hotel reversal.” (34:22 Neumann, 2019). Having
limited perspectives effected the documentary in the way of not having the perspective of
someone who has delt with being trafficked, but the perspective of just catching men in the act
In this documentary lack of credibility presented by men shows and informs us that sex
trafficking cases are now going up. Men never really take responsibility for their actions of
abusing women physically and sexually. Instead of taking credit for what they did and receive
the punishment they find it easier to keep making excuses. For example, when the detectives
were luring men into the hotel room everyone that got caught always had an excuse. One of the
detectives named Melissa stated that “Almost every single male that I interact with the first thing
they want to say is whoa no, no, no.” (36:21 Neumann, 2019). As the males would walk through
the door and got handcuffed, they never took fault on why they were there. Some said “I didn’t
know! The girls I interact with are not trafficking victims.” (36:32 Neumann, 2019). When taken
into custody not one out of five men admitted to meeting up and were too coward to take
credibility for trying to sexually abuse these women. Melissa made it clear on how “Our
requirement went from a simple ticket to sending you on your way to now being booked into
Sanchez 3
jail.” (37:04 Neumann, 2019). The lack of credibility males has in America causes sex
trafficking cases to rise due to them knowing women aren’t willing to speak on it. Lack of
credibility effected the documentary in the way of showing that men can’t own up to the
Word connotations is another example of how this documentary was bias and tries to
inform the viewers to believe that sex trafficking cases have gone up. As the males got booked
into jail they were then sentenced to a hearing where their victims would testify against them.
When in the hearing the witness stated that “Doing something like this to a person is inhumane.”
(45:46 Neumann, 2019), and the defendant stated that he saw no difference “Between trading
drugs in society and trading females.” (48:18 neumann,2019). Going back to the hotel males
would use word connotations to try and manipulate the situation and put the blame on women for
the reason they are at the hotel. One male stated “Well, if I knew that, that someone was under
the control of a pimp doing it forcefully, I wouldn’t be interested in it.” (36:40 Neumann, 2019),
but that was just him trying to backfire on women so he wouldn’t get caught. Word connotations
used by males informs the viewer that cases have gone up because traffickers never take
responsibility and switch up their words. Having word connotations effected the documentary by
making women feel degraded and seem like they are the liars.
The purpose of the documentary Sex Trafficking in America is to inform that sex
trafficking is a major problem and continues to rise in case numbers. The intentions of the
documentary were correct but was very questionable to why there was multiple actions causing
this film to be bias. Women who have been sex trafficked lack confidence in speaking out which
is shown why their traffickers have not been stopped. In addition to the lack of confidence the
audience was presented with limited perspectives which did not help the investigation like it
Sanchez 4
should have. Males made it seem like women ask to be trafficked and want this for themselves,
but the detectives in the documentary prove their point that it is not. Overall, the documentary
was very informative of how bias men are and how numbers have gone up in sex trafficking
cases.