Comprehensive Comparison of Traditional and Distance Learning Master Programs

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Procedia

Social and
Behavioral
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 00 (2011) 000–000
Sciences
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 31 (2012) 120 – 123 www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia

WCLTA 2011

Comprehensive comparison of traditional and distance learning


master programs
Ali Hakan Işik a *, İnan Güler b
a, b
Gazi University Faculty of Technology, Ankara 06500, Turkey

Abstract

In Turkey, higher education takes great interest with multiple choices. Distance learning is emerging education opportunity
especially for people at work. This method that applied in higher education provides time and place independent education. With
innovative advantages, it must be evaluated in different dimensions and other education types. The purpose of the study is to
compare the results of demographic questionnaire and the oral interview. The study group consist of the master students of Gazi
University traditional and distance learning information systems. 46 postgraduate students attended online questionnaire and 6
students attended the oral interview. According to the results of questionnaire and the oral interview, advantages and
disadvantages of distance education and traditional learning were evaluated from the point of view of students. It was found that
students prefer distance learning due to time and permission problem, Gazi university’s popularity and high applicant criteria in
traditional learning. The average of age and the working year of the distance students are lower than those of traditional learning.
Meanwhile, there is not any difference between two groups in terms of computer usability and computer usage year. On the basis
of the results, some suggestions are proposed for distance learning. It is believed that blended learning or virtual laboratory will
enhance postgraduate distance learning effectivity in the future.
©
© 2011 Publishedby
2011 Published byElsevier
Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Prof. Hüseyin Uzunboylu.
Ltd.
Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
Keywords: Distance learning, traditional learning, SPSS

1. Introduction

Distance education is a field where web-based technology was very quickly adopted and used for course delivery
and knowledge sharing. Typical web-based learning environments include course content delivery tools,
synchronous and asynchronous conferencing systems, polling and quiz modules, virtual workspaces for sharing
resources, white boards, grade reporting systems, logbooks, assignment submission components, etc. In a virtual
classroom, educators provide resources such as text, multimedia and simulations, and moderate and animate
discussions. Remote learners are encouraged to peruse the resources and participate in activities (Zaiane 2001). In
distance learning, instructional and design strategies are using internet-based environments to promote student
satisfaction and learning effectiveness (Woolsey 2004).
There are so many studies related to the comparison in web based distance learning. For instance, Kurt compared
virtual education applications (Kurt 2006), Tesone and colleagues compared student perception of instruction scores
between online and regular classes (Tesone 2008), lionarakis and colleagues compared open distance and

* Ali Hakan Isik Tel.: +0-90-312-202 37 94


E-mail address: ahakan@gazi.edu.tr

1877-0428 © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Prof. Hüseyin Uzunboylu.
Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.027
Ali Hakan
AliIşik and I·Işik
Hakan nan Güler / Procedia
/ Procedia - Social
– Social and Behavioral
and Behavioral Sciences
Sciences 31 (2012)
00 (2011) 120 – 123
000–000 121

conventional education (Lionarakis 2003), Tinnerman compared traditional and distance education instructional
environments (Tinnerman 2006).
This study comprises three sections. In the first section the study group, data collection and the analyzing tool are
presented. The second section aims to evaluate and discuss distance learning master program with demographic
questionnaire results using SPSS and oral interview results. Finally, section three presents conclusion and
recommendation to the issue of comprehensive comparison of traditional and distance learning master programs.

2. Method

The study group consisted of 46 postgraduate students that include 20 traditional and 26 distance learning
postgraduate students in Gazi university information system’s master program. The demographic questionnaire is
applied to these groups. Data obtained from questionnaire is analyzed with SPSS 15.0. In addition, oral interview is
performed with 4 traditional and 2 distance learning students. Generally, the level of significance is taken as 0.05 (
Işık 2010). In our study, significance level is taken as 0.05. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA techniques
are used for analyzing data.

3. Results

Using SPSS, statistical evaluation provide information related to the demographic questionnaire. Furthermore,
oral interview results enhance understanding of students’ thought and requirements. SPSS results are presented
below; First sub-question of the study regarding the average of distance learning and traditional learning age of the
students and the working year. As seen in Table 1 and Table 2, the average age of distance learning students and
working year are lower than those of the traditional learning.

Table 1. (a) The average age of traditional learning students (b) The average age of distance learning students

Frequency Percent Frequency Percent


Valid 22-24 2 10 Valid 22-24 2 7,7
24-26 4 20 24-26 9 34,7
26-28 5 25 26-28 7 26,9
28-30 2 35 28-30 3 11,5
30- 7 10 30- 5 19,2
Total 20 100 Total 26 100,0

Table 2. (a) The average working year of traditional learning students (b) The average working year of distance learning students

Frequency Percent Frequency Percent


Valid 0-2 2 10 Valid 0-2 7 27
2-4 3 15 2-4 6 23,1
4-6 5 25 4-6 5 19,2
6-8 4 30 6-8 5 19,2
8- 6 20 8- 3 11,5
Total 20 100 Total 26 100,0

2
122 Ali Ali
Hakan
Hakan and/ I·Procedia
IşikIşik nan Güler–/Social
Procedia
and-Behavioral
Social and Sciences
Behavioral
00Sciences 31 (2012) 120 – 123
(2011) 000–000

Second sub-question of the study is represented as “Why did you prefer distance learning?”. It iss derived from the
questionnaire that students prefer distance learning due to time and permission problem, Gazi university’s popularity
and the high applicant criteria in traditional learning. Time and permission problem have the highest ratio. The
obtained results are presented in Table 3.
Table 3. Why did you prefer distance learning?

Frequency Percent
Valid Advanced course content
0 0

Time and permission problem 16 61,55


I did not get acceptance from traditional programs
1 3,85

High applicant criteria of traditional learning


3 11,5

Educational environment of distance learning


0 0

Gazi university education quality


1 3,85

Gazi university popularity


3 11,55

Education price 0 0
My friend's advice 0 0
Others 2 7,7
Total 26 100,0

As seen in Table 4, one way ANOVA test is applied so as to determine whether or not there is a meaningful
statistical differentiation among “traditional and distance learning students” in terms of sub-question of “computer
usability and computer usage year”. As a result of one way ANOVA test, it is found that there isn’t meaningful
statistical differentiation between traditional and distance learning students in terms of sub-question [For Computer
usability F=1,655 and P>0,05], [For Computer usage year F=0, 901 and P>0,05]. It can be said that traditional and
distance learning students have nearly same computer usability level and computer usage year.

Table 4. One Way ANOVA test results (a) In terms of Computer usability (b) In terms of Computer usage year

Sum of Mean Sum of Mean


Squares df Square F Sig. Squares df Square F Sig.
Between Between
75,752 3 25,251 1,655 ,187 ,576 3 ,192 ,901 ,446
Groups Groups
Within Groups Within Groups
900,248 59 15,258 12,783 60 ,213

Total 976,000 62 Total 13,359 63

3
Ali Hakan
AliIşik and I·Işik
Hakan nan Güler / Procedia
/ Procedia - Social
– Social and Behavioral
and Behavioral Sciences
Sciences 31 (2012)
00 (2011) 120 – 123
000–000 123

3.1. Oral Interview

In the oral interview, the same questionnaire questions are employed in the study group. The interesting results
are found. Obtained results are presented below:
As it is derived from statistical results, the age of distance learning students and working year are lower than
traditional learning students. For this reason, knowledge about their job is not enough and they have to work hard. In
addition, they want to improve their knowledge in university master program and they have permission and time
problem. The time and permission problem forced them to prefer distance learning. Some students who graduated
from a private university want to study in Gazi University. They want to be the graduates a state university. Some
students do not know distance learning but they think that distance learning must be the effective, easiest and
sophisticated way to continue education.
Students who want to do doctorate prefer traditional learning due to the PhD entry requirements. Some PhD
programs only accepts special students who graduated from a master program with thesis. In addition, education
cost of distance learning is higher than traditional learning. This reason mentioned and the idea that traditional of
traditional learning is more effective than distance learning lead to the preference of traditional learning.

4. Conclusion

The number students of distance learning master program is increasing rapidly. At the same time, there are some
challenges. In web based distance learning, the main question is how to assess and improve quality education. In this
context, comparison of traditional learning with distance learning has great importance. In this study, distance and
traditional learning are compared.
From the point of view of students, advantages of distance learning are time and place independences, repetition
opportunity of virtual classroom section. Some students do no prefer distance learning. Main reasons are school fee,
non-positive idea about distance learning, desiring of a master thesis. It is believed that this thesis related to their
education field will be valuable in PhD entrance. With distance learning, working people can continue education
independences of time and permission problems. In addition, educators in university are working hard and it is not
easy to teach lots of students in different faculties. There is time and place problem for the educator and university.
Distance learning will meet these requirements. Due to time or place challenges, it has been tried to enhance web
based distance learning features and methodology.
It is well known that laboratory experiment has not effectively been performed in distance learning. Some virtual
laboratory application offers distance learning. However, its effectiveness hasn’t been precisely proven. On the basis
of the results, it is safe to claim that non-experimental master programs such as information systems, computer
engineering education can be given as distance learning.

References

Zaiane, O. R., Luo, J. (2001). Towards evaluating learners' behavior in a Web-based distance learning environment, IEEE International
Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, USA, 357 – 360.
Woolsey, R., Rodchua, S. (2004).Quality Measurement and Good Practices in Web-Based Distance Learning: A Case Study of the Industrial
Management Program at Central Missouri State University, Journal of industrial technology, 20(4), 1-9.
Kurt, M. (2006). Comparative analysis of virtual education applications, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 7(4).
Tesone, D. V. , Ricci, P. (2008). Student Perceptions of Web-based Instruction: A Comparative Analysis, Journal of Online Learning and
Teaching, 4(3), 317-324.
Lionarakis, A., Papademetriou, D. (2003). The quality of the learning experience: a comparative study between open distance and conventional
education, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 4(2).
Tinnerman, L. S. (2006). A Comparative Study Between Traditional and Distance Education Instructional Environments Involving Two Graduate
Level Learning Disabilities Classes, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 3(4), 31-42.
Işık, A. H., Karakış, R., Güler, İ. (2010). Postgraduate students attitudes towards distance learning (The case study of Gazi University). Procedia
- Social and Behavioral Sciences(Elsevier), 9, 218-222.

You might also like