Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Film Screen Radiography
Film Screen Radiography
CL21M012
Clinical engineering (M.tech)
Assignments
- How to evaluate image quality in conventional film screen radiography, Computed
Radiography, Flat panel detector technology, Fluoroscopy, CT and MRI. (30 marks)
- Cardiac CT scanner (10 marks)
- Troubleshooting in a Radiography un =it (10 marks)
No plagiarism allowed, write in your own words and give appropriate references when
figures are included. Include a detailed bibliography if materials are used from the internet.
Topic 1
Computed Radiography[2]
The image Interpretation depends on two factor quality of image and ability of interpreter
Figure 1
Various method to evaluate image quality can be classified as shown in the above figure:
Physical methods include modulation transfer factor (MTF), noise, SNR, and detection
quantum efficiency (DQE). Psychophysical evaluation methods include rose model (RM),
contrast detail analysis (CDA) and subjective assessment of physical parameters. Clinical
performance measurement methods include receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) and
visual grading characteristic (VGC).
Detective Quantum efficiency (DQE)
Measurement parameters are Modulation transfer function(MTF) and Noise power
spectrum(NPS)
MTF describe behavior of spatial resolution at all frequencies:
1. Image is imported
2. Edge spread function (ESF) is constructed
3. From ESF line spread function (LSF) is obtained
4. Fourier transformation of LSF to obtain MTF
NPS measure noise attributes and pattern at all frequencies:
1. Obtain Flood exposure image
2. Sampling is performed
3. Data is linearized
4. 2D Fourier transformation to average data
Noise
Noise is of two types of quantum noise and electronic noise
Quantum noise
Fluctuation of photon counts. X-rays count follow Poisson Distribution with variance
and mean. A gray-level calibration factor converts the detected signal in photons to a
signal in gray levels. Due to sampling, noise power spectrum NPS a digital system is
aliased at frequencies above the cutoff frequency after mathematical operation like
convolution noise is given by
Electronic noise
Noise from sources such as thin film transistors switch on the pixel and the
preamplifier on the data line. This is independent of the exposure. Assuming pixel
gray level variance due to electronic noise is equal to the noise variance produced by
Ne x-ray photons, it is given by
Fluoroscopy[4]
Image quality assessment
Contrast scale
Image uniformity and distortion
Spatial (high contrast) resolution
Noise (and Video signal)
Contrast (low contrast) resolution
Overall Image Quality (Contrast/Detail Diagram)
IQ dependence of “window” and matrix
IQ dependence of reconstruction/frame rate
IQ dependence of image processing
Subjective assessment (eyes condition)
Attenuate the X-ray output (1mm Cu)
Check all II field sizes with all test objects
Adjust TV monitor (contrast/brightness)
visible field size/distortions/homogeneity
noise, contrast resolution (contrast/detail)
lim. spatial resolution (no attenuation)
CT scan[5]
Three factor of image quality
(i) spatial resolution (ii) noise and (iii) contrast
ARTIFACTS
Artifacts are the degradation of image quality that leads to wrong or miss diagnosis
Motion Artifacts
Patient during the scan may move that causes unpredictable data during scan and a streak can
be seen on the image, with increase in scan time motion artifacts are increased. This cause
error in reconstruction. Double image may appear o0r ghosting of image is happened.
Streak Artifacts
Dark and light lines appear due to absence of transmitted x rays. High density material such
as metal implants.
Beam Hardening Artifacts
Absorption of low energy beam while passing through patient cause mean energy to increase
as a result beam is hardened that cause underestimation of HU. Can be corrected by
algorithm.
Ring Artifacts
Mis calibration of one detector in rotate-rotate system of 3rd gen CT. due to this incorrect data
will appear as a ring on every projection
Partial Volume Artifacts
Partial volume artifact is result of averaging the linear attenuation coefficient in a given voxel
that is heterogeneous in composition.
Rod Artifacts
Rod artifacts due to varying shape of high contrast object.
Spiral Artifacts
A helical scan gives an image similar to partial volume averaging (PVA). In one direction,
the PVA is determined by collimation, and in the other direction, it is by collimation and
table increment per rotation. As a result, instead of a perfect circle, an ellipse like
reconstruction is done.
MRI[6]
Quality Monitoring Through Stages of Imaging Workflow:
After the scan is taken image is processed and transmitted to storage system has adverse
effect on image quality. The potential of an MRI system to generate high contrast image can
be reduced by improper system parameter settings. Also, patient motion during scan
introduce blur and artifacts which decrease sharpness and details
References
1. Book: The Physics of Radiology and Imaging by Thayalan K.
2. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2051-3909.2012.tb00174.x
Figure1 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2051-3909.2012.tb00174.x
3. https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1118/1.1628278
4. Farr's physics for medical imaging
5. Book: The Physics of Radiology and Imaging by Thayalan K.
6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6126794/