Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program

Individualized Learning Plan (ILP)

Directions: The ILP should be completed with Mentor input. Complete blue cells prior to classroom implementation. Complete orange cells after POP Cycle is completed. Cells will expand as
needed. When submitting completed ILP to instructor, please include copies/images of pre/post assessments/directions and the Pre/Post Assessment Data Table.
New Teacher
Samantha Goodman
Mentor
Ann Truong
Directions: Identify 2-3 CSTP elements for ILP focus. Use most recent CSTP Assessment for Initial Rating. Identify both teacher and student rating for CSTP 1 and 2. See example.
CSTP Element
Promoting critical thinking
1.5 through inquiry, problem
solving, and reflection
Involving all students in self-
assessment, goal-setting,
5.5
and progress monitoring
Collecting and analyzing
assessment data from a
5.2
variety of sources to inform
instruction
Section 3: Inquiry Focus and Planning (Attach Pre/Post Assessments and Data Collection Tools)
Directions: Your inquiry question should be concise and likely no more than 8-10 words. Your hypothesis should indicate what you expect students to be able to do after the lesson, and it should
be able to be evaluated based on your assessment plan. Note that Semester 3 requires an inquiry question that focuses on use of technology to support teaching and learning.
Inquiry Question
How will students be able to self-
assess themselves and know that
they are effectively working towards
the goal of the lesson?  assessment plan, this will be when
Revised 11.5.18
Section 1: New Teacher Information
Email Subject Area Grade Level
sgoodman@opaschools.org All Subjects 4th
Email School/District Date
Oxford Preparatory Academy –
atruong@opaschools.org 3/6/2021
SOC
Section 2: CSTP Areas of Inquiry
Initial Rating Description Goal Rating Description
T - Guide students to think critically through use of questioning strategies, T - Facilitates systematic opportunities for students to apply critical thinking
posing/solving problems, and reflection on issues in content. by designing structured inquires into complex problems.
T – Applying T – Innovating
S - Students respond to varied questions or tasks designed to promote S - Students pose and answer a wide-range of complex questions and
S – Exploring S - Innovating
comprehension and critical thinking in single lessons or a sequence of problems, reflect, and communicate understandings based on in depth
lessons. analysis of content learning.
T- Giving students different methods to check in with their own work T- A variety of methods are given to the students for each subject matter
T- Exploring through various rubrics. T- Integrating on how they will self-assess themselves.
S- Applying S- Students are given rubrics to self-assess themselves and also able to S- Exploring S – Students are able to self-identify when they need to check in on their
peer-edit each others work with a rubric. own work.
T- Able to include more informal assessments to help students in
T- Using data from weekly tests to plan for the upcoming week
T- Exploring T- Applying specific areas before a formal assessment
S- Students apply what they have learned throughout the week on
S-Emerging S- Exploring S- Students are able to take multiple informal assessments to see
the weekly tests
where they need extra help
Hypothesis Lesson Series Topic Assessments/Data Collection
 CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.4.1: Write
opinion pieces on topics or texts,
supporting a point of view with
reasons and information.
 As we move into the last trimester
of the school year, students will be
 The pre-assessment will be the
working on opinion writing. We will
students cold write that they
Students will be able to see the start the year with a cold write, and
complete. I will read them the
before the trimester ends in June,
progress they make from their cold- students will complete their
prompt and they will respond as
best as they can. After they
write to their benchmark writing. benchmark writing. At the end,
complete the cold write, I will look
students will be able to see how
through all their papers and see
much growth and progress they
what specific skills we need to work
Students will be able to self-evaluate have made through 4 months. 
on as a class and what skills
 Students will complete 2 different
their writing throughout the students might need to work on in a
opinion writings, one that is direct
small group. For my post
trimester to see where they need to instruction, so they learn how to
make improvements.  write an opinion writing, and the
students complete their benchmark
other they will work
writing at the end of the semester
on independently. For the
and I will see how much they have
independent one, students will have
Students will set a goal of what they to self-evaluate their writing to see
accomplished. If they still need to
want to achieve in their writing. work on specific skills, I can let the
if it meets the expectations of an
5th grade teachers know that they
opinion writing paper. 
struggled with a specific skill.
 Before we start writing in the
upcoming trimester, I will have
students set a goal for themselves
on what they would like to achieve
for the upcoming trimester of
writing.

Focus Students
Directions: Identify three focus students for your inquiry. Identify special characteristics of the students and include performance data. Explain why you have selected them for this inquiry focus.
Do not use actual names of students. (Note: At least one focus student should be an English learner and at least one must have an ILP/504 accommodation. The third is your choice, but please
identify someone that poses an instructional challenge.) Identify expected results for each focus student.
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student with ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
My English Leaner currently gets pulled twice a week by My IEP student has a had time focusing and parents have
our EL specialist and twice a week by our intervention mentioned how writing is not his favorite thing to do. It
This student loves writing and will ask so many clarifying
specialist for ELA. He has been working very hard on takes him a bunch of reminders to make sure that he is
Performance questions to make sure she is accurately responding to
completing his work, but he does tend to write at a on task. Usually when a time limit is set, he is able to get
Data slower rate. I want to see how well he can do when we his work done more quickly. Since he wants to get over
the prompt. She always goes above and beyond what we
are doing.
have only a certain amount of time to complete the things he does not like, his quality of work is not always
writing. great.
I expect this student to need some extra time to work on
I expect this student to write about a paragraph or two I expect this student to do very well on our writings.
his writing, since he does get easily distracted and might
that is related to the topic. I hope that after teaching Since she will most likely do well, I will challenge her with
Expected Results about opinion writing for a month, he will feel more
need some breaks away from writing time. He can
her writing by making sure she has a lot of descriptive
perform well academically, he just struggles with
confident in his work. details and citations from different sources.
focusing and completing his work in one sitting.
Inquiry Lesson Implementation Plan
Directions: that Semester 3 requires a lesson that focuses on use of technology to support teaching and learning.
Administer Pre-Assessment Deliver Lesson(s) Administer Post-Assessment Analyze Results Discuss Results with Mentor

Individualized Learning Plan, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017 Page 1 of 4
 Identify dates for activities. 3/21 4/11-4/29 5/5 5/6 5/9

Provide 1-2 sentence Students will be working on two different opinion piece writings. One writing will be guided and the other will be more independently
summary of your lesson plan. done.

For the pre-assessment, students will have 2 hours to complete the “cold-write,” which means they will just be read the prompt and
Summarize process for have the rest of the time to complete the writing. After students complete the writing, I will look at the writing and see what areas of
administering and analyzing opinion writing student need to work on. For the next month, I will work with my students on teaching them how to write an opinion
pre- and post-assessments. writing. After the month, students will complete the writing benchmark, which is unassisted, and they will be given the same 2 hours
to complete it. I will look at their benchmarks to see the growth that they have made.
Semester 3 Only: Identify the
specific technology tools,
applications, links, and/or
devices to be incorporated
into the lesson.
Section 4: Inquiry Research and Exploration
Research/Professional Learning (Identify two articles that have informed inquiry focus. Provide title, URL or citation, and statement of what was learned.)

Article 1:
Article 2:
Andrade, H. L., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The
effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric‐referenced self‐
Yan, Z., Brown, G. T., Lee, J. C. K., & Qiu, X. L. (2020). Student self-
assessment on elementary school students' writing. Educational
assessment: Why do they do it?. Educational Psychology, 40(4), 509-532.
Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 3-13.
This article mentions how self-assessment is mostly teacher directed, and not
This article states how sometimes teachers are not able to provide all the
students who want to self-assess because they want to improve themselves.
feedback to kids that they need, so self-assessment comes in handy because
The best part about self-assessment is that the student is the one in control of
students are able to evaluate their own work. When students are performing
self-assessing their work. In order for students to benefit from self-
their own self-assessment, they are becoming more self-aware of their own
assessment, they need to be comfortable giving truthful feedback to
work. We can't expect students to understand how to self-assess themselves
themselves and the teacher. If students are not comfortable, self-assessment
without explicitly teaching them how and when to use it. One of the main ways
will not work. While this article conducted its own study, it does mention that
students can self-assess is by using a rubric. Having students use a rubric to
the different types of self-assessment they used will not necessarily work for
evaluate their work has proven to improve student work. Students are able to
others.
become more involved in the process.

Colleagues (Summarize how two colleagues have addressed this issue in their classroom. Identify grade level, subject, and summary of ideas.)
Fourth grade teacher: This teacher introduces the prompt to his entire class and
Fourth Grade Teacher: She has daily journal prompts for the students, so they are
then teaches the students the writing skills in small groups. He finds it easier to
always actively writing. She also shares her expectations of the students writing
meet in small groups so he can answer all of the questions students have about
on the board each day when they are responding to their writing prompt. She has
how the writing is supposed to look. Also, since students are in a smaller group,
noticed that since she shares her expectations, some of their writing has
they are able to get more attention from him, instead of 33 students all asking for
improved.
help at the same time.
Special Emphasis: ISTE Standards (Semester 3 only)
Directions: Identify at least one ISTE-Educator and at least one ISTE- Student Standards that are the primary focus of your project. Explain how these standards will be incorporated.
Special Emphasis Focus How Special Emphasis will be Incorporated

Section 5: Results and Reflection

Directions: Record Pre- and post- assessment data into Pre/Post Assessment Data Table (see end of document). Include copies/images of pre/post assessments/directions and the Pre/Post
Assessment Data Table with submission.
Pre/Post Assessment Data Analysis Findings for Whole Class Pre/Post Assessment Data Analysis Findings for Three Focus Students
One of my focus students was able to meet their goal. The goal
27 out of 32 students were able to meet their goal. for my IEP and EL student were both not met, even when
provided with extra support outside of the classroom.
Initial Evidence/Rational for Rating
CSTP Element Revised Rating Suggestions for Moving Forward
Rating (Summarize from POP Section 3)
Promoting critical
To move to INNOVATING level: Consider how to increase
thinking through T – Applying Teacher asked questions of analysis and evaluation.
T – Integrating complexity of task beyond a single lesson so that there are
1.5 inquiry, problem S– Students answered questions that included all levels of Bloom’s.
S - Integrating continuing opportunities for students to engage in inquiry in
solving, and Exploring Students created their own math problems.
complex problem. How could you extend lesson into PBL?
reflection
Involving all Teacher was able to hand students self-assessment rubric, and
students in self-
To move to the innovating level, I would have my
students were able to self check their work.
5.5
assessment, goal-
setting, and progress
T- Exploring T- Applying Students were able to complete the self-assessment rubric
students create their own rubric on what should be in a
writing assignment. This would show me that students
S- Applying knowing what the expectations were for the writing assignment.
monitoring S- Applying Students were able to peer-edit other students work and apply know the expectations and can make sure their work
self-assessment skills to others. includes all of the items they listed in it.
5.2 Collecting and T- Exploring Students are given multiple writing benchmarks To move to the integrating level, I would need to create
analyzing S-Emerging
T – Applying throughout the school year, so as this was the last one, some type of informal assessment that went along with
Individualized Learning Plan, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017 Page 2 of 4
 assessment data students have greatly progressed in their writing ability. the writing students were completing. I am able to
from a variety of Teacher was able to use all of the students prior check in with students and meet with them, but not as
sources to inform S- Exploring knowledge from writing this school year to help guide much as I would like to really help them improve in the
instruction instruction for this writing assignment. areas that need improvement.

Special Emphasis ISTE-Educator and ISTE-Student Standards (Semester 3 only)

Results of Incorporation into Lesson Key Learnings and New Skills/Knowledge Developed by Teacher

Action Items
For curriculum design, lesson For lesson planning for writing, I want to include more free writing for students, so they can use the skills they just
planning, assessment learned about and turn it into their own writing. We focus so much on this is the topic we chose for you, but maybe if
planning we gave them the freedom to pick, they would want to actually write.

For classroom practice For classroom practice, I want to continue meeting with students individually to help support them in their writing.

For teaching English learners,
students with special needs,
and students with other
instructional challenges
For future professional
development
For future inquiry/ILP
For next POP cycle
For my EL and IEP students, they will continue to get more support from me and the other specialist on campus to make
sure all of their needs are getting met. I will make sure to provide a wide variety of differentiated instruction to me, so
they can understand things from multiple perspectives.
For future professional development, I am currently planning to take a bunch between now and July of 2023 at UCSD,
to help me become more educated on topics that I find interesting. I am currently enrolled in a class on how to help
teach students that are classified as ‘Gifted’ and I plan to take another one that focuses on STEAM in the classroom.
For the next ILP, I want to gather more data from each trimester to really help measure my student’s growth and also to
show them how much progress they are making. I know they get happy when they seem improvement!
For the next POP Cycle, I want to make sure I really address the needs of the students that are not meeting grade level
expectations.

Semester 3 Only:
For future use of technology
Other Notes

Pre-/Post- Assessment Data Table follows this document.

Include copies/images of pre-/post- assessments/directions and the Pre/Post Assessment Data Table with submission.

Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program

Individualized Learning Plan (ILP)
Revised 5.1.17
Directions: Record student pre and post scores in this table. Do not use student’s actual names.
New Teacher Email Subject Area Grade Level
Samantha Goodman sgoodman@opaschools.org Writing 4th
Pre-Assessment Data Range and Average Post-Assessment Data Range and Average
Writing Score: Out of 10 Writing Score: Out of 10
Average: 7/10 Average: 8/10
PRE-/POST- ASSESSMENT DATA TABLE
Student Pre-Assessment Score Post-Assessment Score Comments
1. Focus Student: EL 3/10 Incomplete Goal not met
2. Focus Student: 504/IEP No Score No score Goal not met
3. Focus Student: Teacher Choice 10/10 10/10 Goal met
4. Student 1 5/10 7/10 Goal met
5. Student 2 7/10 10/10 Goal met
6. Student 3 7/10 10/10 Goal met
7. Student 4 5/10 10/10 Goal met
8. Student 5 8/10 10/10 Goal met
9. Student 6 9/10 10/10 Goal met
Individualized Learning Plan, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017 Page 3 of 4
 10. Student 7 10/10 10/10 Goal met
11. Student 8 7/10 8/10 Goal met
12. Student 9 8/10 10/10 Goal met
13. Student 10 10/10 7/10 Goal met
14. Student 11 5/10 10/10 Goal met
15. Student 12 5/10 3/10 Goal not met
16. Student 13 10/10 9/10 Goal met
17. Student 14 7/10 10/10 Goal met
18. Student 15 3/10 9/10 Goal met
19. Student 16 10/10 10/10 Goal met
20. Student 17 10/10 10/10 Goal met
21. Student 18 9/10 8/10 Goal met
22. Student 19 8/10 8/10 Goal met
23. Student 20 8/10 8/10 Goal met
24. Student 21 5/10 6/10 Goal not met
25. Student 22 5/10 8/10 Goal met
26. Student 23 10/10 9/10 Goal met
27. Student 24 4/10 8/10 Goal met
28. Student 25 10/10 10/10 Goal met
29. Student 26 6/10 8/10 Goal met
30. Student 27 10/10 10/10 Goal met
31. Student 28 5/10 6/10 Goal not met
32. Student 29 10/10 10/10 Goal met
910111213141516

Individualized Learning Plan, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017 Page 4 of 4