Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Irr Ap Seminar - Political and Historical of School Shootings
Final Irr Ap Seminar - Political and Historical of School Shootings
Throughout the 1950’s and 1960’s, the United States rarely experienced school
shootings; however, the occurrences increased after 1979 when an elementary school shooting
was carried out by a struggling 16-year-old female with poor mental health (Ennis et al. 2564).
Two people were killed while eight students and one adult were injured due to a firearm (Ennis
et al. 2564). The outbreak of school shootings in the U.S. has violated students’ safety and
disturbed the privileges of public education. Columbine High School became vastly known for
its mass shooting. John Woodrow Cox, an enterprise writer (“John Woodrow Cox”), and Steven
Rich, a database editor (“Steven Rich”), both work at The Washington Post. They claimed,
“More than 187,000 students have been exposed to gun violence at school since Columbine...”
(Cox and Rich). Students are mainly the victims while the perpetrators tend to be troubled
individuals who seek out revenge or struggle with a mental illness. The perpetrators bring
firearms onto school campus, which then leads to them firing at large crowds of people. In the
political lens, the stakeholders are the school shooters, American students, and U.S. legislators.
Examining school shootings in the United States unveils how the misuse of guns causes death,
protests, and different policies being enacted by the U.S. government. Moreover, the political
lens demonstrates how school shootings influence the ongoing debate between gun rights and
gun control. The mass shootings committed by school shooters, student protests, and responses
from the U.S. government suggests a need to establish a more secure and positive learning
In the United States, school shooters committed violent acts through the availability of
guns. In Colorado, the infamous Columbine High School shooting was committed by two
teenage students named Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris in April of 1999; furthermore, fifteen
2
people were killed, including Klebold and Harris (Birkland and Lawrence 1193). According to
Gary Kleck, the Professor of Criminology at Florida State University (“Professor Honored for
Dedication to Criminology Field, Research”), “The pistol was sold directly to Harris and Klebold
by a 22-year-old private owner...” (1452). Kleck addresses how Harris and Klebold were both
minors when they purchased firearms; additionally, he explains why it was against the law for
them to have any access to guns (1452). Kleck’s reasons are logical because Harris and Klebold
illegally obtained guns when they were underage; thus, they brought it onto the school campus to
attack classmates and teachers. Another example includes the Sandy Hook Elementary massacre.
Lisa Owings, a graduate from the University of Minnesota with an English and creative writing
degree (112), explains why Adam Lanza killed twenty students and six adults at Sandy Hook
Elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut (15). Owings thoroughly explains the life of Lanza
by including his struggle with Asperger’s syndrome, which caused him to have difficulty with
social skills (18). Owings also includes how “…investigators found a large arsenal of firearms
and other weapons in his home” that were all purchased by his mother (64). Owings shares her
perspective by explaining how Lanza’s mental illness and the easy access to guns played a factor
in the shooting. She validates her reasoning through providing Lanza’s background and the
findings of the investigators. The availability of firearms allows individuals to commit crimes
and place others under harm; therefore, student protests and arguments between gun control and
The aftermath of school shootings negatively affects U.S. students; therefore, protests
provide them a voice to gain recognition from the government. According to Nancy Scheper-
Scheper-Hughes”), “...students held a public rally. They yelled, they wept and they pledged to
3
‘have a voice’ against gun violence. Among the speakers was a senior student, Sophie Colson,
who asked a question that captured the generational divide: ‘Are your guns more important than
our lives?’” (4). Scheper-Hughes uses Sophie Colson’s belief in gun control to justify the
importance of students fighting for their safety. She supports the effort of young students in
preventing gun violence; thus, her reasoning is logical because students are the main victims of
this issue, which allows them to speak out. However, U.S. citizens all have different views on
gun policies. People are split into “…two positions—gun rights and gun control, the opposing
views that dominate modern debate over gun policies…” (Cornell 868). Many citizens believe in
regulating gun laws in order to prevent future mass shootings, while others believe that gun
rights should not be taken away. Alan Blinder and Vivian Yee, writers for The New York Times,
interviewed Caleb Conrad, a sixteen-year-old junior in high school, and asked for his perspective
on school shootings. He said, “‘People say it’s all about gun control…But that’s not the real
issue here. The real issue is the people who are doing it’” (Blinder and Yee). The New York
Times, a liberal source (“Ideological Placement of Each Source’s Audience”), may show bias
addition, they attempt to offer both sides a fair representation. The protests allow students to seek
As a response to school shootings, U.S. legislators imposed new policies. Nadia Nedzel, a
Professor of Law at Southern University Law Center (“Nadia E. Nedzel”), states, “...Congress
passed the GFSZA [Gun-Free School Zones Act], making it a federal crime to possess a firearm
when one knows or should know that one is in a school zone” (430). Nedzel explains that the
GFSZA was issued due to a male with schizophrenia killing two students and injuring eleven
people at an elementary school in North Carolina during 1988 (430). She supports the
4
Congress’s actions by showing the dangers of carrying firearms onto school campus through
using the shooting in 1988 as an example. Furthermore, the U.S. government has also
University (“Mark Gius”), states, “When the assault weapons ban (state or Federal) was in effect,
the number of school shooting victims was 54.4% less than when the assault weapons ban was
not in effect…” (319). Although the ban showed a potential reduction in shootings, it did not
become permanent because it violated the Second Amendment. The ban expired in 2004 and
“After 2004, the number of [people] killed in school shootings increased dramatically…” (Gius
320). Gius argues how gun control policies remain ineffective because school shootings rapidly
increased after the ban expired (320). He validates his perspective by analyzing the amount of
school shootings during the ban and after its expiration. Another response was “In 1999, [when]
the Virginia legislature created the Virginia Center for School Safety as a state entity responsible
for training law enforcement officers to serve in schools” (Clark 92). School shootings occur
unexpectedly; thus, officers will help protect students and staffs during these situations. In order
to establish a secure and positive learning environment, Virginia increased supervision on school
campus.
Due to school shooters obtaining firearms, student protests, and U.S. legislators’
responses, a more stable and positive learning environment needs to be installed among schools
by instituting stricter gun control laws in the United States. The misusage of guns has produced
deadly school shootings, where many people, especially students, were injured and killed. These
violent acts have also disturbed the safety of students, causing them to feel endangered when
they are attending school. In order to prevent future school shootings, the U.S. government
should enact stricter gun control laws because minors, such as Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris,
5
were able to purchase firearms illegally; furthermore, Adam Lanza was able to have easy access
to the guns in his own home. The temporary assault weapon ban has also proved to decrease the
amount of school shootings. The political lens reveals how certain individuals take advantage of
the right to bear arms and how students act into spreading light onto gun violence. In addition,
the political lens allows the examination of how U.S. legislators impose different policies, such
Works Cited
Birkland, Thomas A. and Regina G. Lawrence. “Guns, Hollywood, and School Safety: Defining
the School-Shooting Problem Across Public Arenas.” Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-
Blackwell), vol. 85, no. 5, Dec. 2004, p. 1193. Professional Development Collection,
Blinder, Alan and Vivian Yee. “National School Walkout: Thousands Protest Against Gun
Violence Across the U.S.” The New York Times, 14 Mar. 2018,
Clark, Steven. “The Role of Law Enforcement in Schools: The Virginia Experience-A
Practitioner Report.” New Directions for Youth Development, vol. 2011, no. 129, 2011, p.
Cornell, Saul, and Emma Cornell. “The Second Amendment and Firearms Regulation: A
Journal of Public Health, vol. 108, no. 7, July 2018, p. 868. Academic Search Premier,
Cox, John Woodrow and Steven Rich. "How many children are affected by school gun violence
2020.
Ennis, Robin Parks, et al. “Historical Examination of United States Intentional Mass School
Shootings in the 20th and 21st Centuries: Implications for Students, Schools, and
Society.” Journal of Child & Family Studies, vol. 27, no. 8, July 2018, p.2564. Advanced
Gius, Mark. “The Effects of State and Federal Gun Control Laws on School Shootings.” Applied
Economics Letters, vol. 25, no. 5, Mar. 2018, pp. 319-320. Advanced Placement Source,
“Ideological Placement of Each Source's Audience.” Pew Research Center, 26 Jan. 2016,
Kleck, Gary. “Mass Shootings in Schools: The Worst Possible Case for Gun Control.” American
Jan. 2020.
Nedzel, Nadia. “Concealed Carry: The Only Way to Discourage Mass School Shootings.”
Academic Questions, vol. 27, no. 4, Dec. 2014, p. 430. Professional Development
“Professor Honored for Dedication to Criminology Field, Research.” Florida State University
Scheper, Hughes, Nancy. “How to Talk (and Not to Talk) about School Shootings.”
Anthropology Today, vol. 34, no. 2, Apr. 2018, p. 4. Academic Search Premier,
Owings, Lisa. The Newtown School Shooting. ABDO Publishing, 2013. eBook Collection,
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=643363&site=ehost-live.