With the increase of democracies, there will be a decrease of the probability of war.

 
It is important to spread the ideology of democracy.
 
Reason for decrease of war relies on two main factors
 Norm-externalization
 Trust and respect.
 
Meaning that because they trust and respect other democracies, they are willing to work
with each other to mend any conflicts.
 Rosato debunks this myth by providing historical examples like the Cold War and
the Great Powers.
 
Non-democratic countries
 
The Democratic Peace Theory continues on to explain that non-democratic countries are
neither trusted or respected because their domestic system is deemed unjust in the eyes of
democracies.
 
“Extreme lack of public respect or trust is one of the major features that distinguishes
relations between liberal and nonliberal societies from relations among liberal
societies.”
 
In addition, nondemocratic countries are often more likely to extract power by attacking or
using harsh forces.
 
War was another topic that Rosato related democratic peace theory to.
 
Rosato explained that democratic countries will often fight non-democratic countries but
they still remain at peace with one another.
 
Democratic Peace Theory also claims that there are far fewer reasons to go to war when
there are more democracies but it’s important to note that they justify war in cases where
their country’s safety is at risk.
 Rosato debunks this claim by mentioning Germany and the United States conflict in
World War II. As Germany progressively changed their beliefs and policies, the
relationship between Germany and the United States started to diminish. American
leaders justified the war on Germany because they stopped viewing Germany as a
democracy. This contradicts the claim of the Democratic Peace Theory. This proves
that whether or not a country was a democracy was not a determinant for foreign
affairs and relations.  This also proves that there is no clear definition of a true
“democratic” country because affairs and opinions are constantly changing.
 
Rosato provides concrete details that war and opposing opinions are going to occur whether
or not a country is a democracy.
 
No two countries are in fact the exactly the same, therefore they will not always come to an
equal verdict on issues, causing a repercussion that sometimes lead to war, famine or new
polices implemented. 
 
Conclusions
 
Democratic Peace Theory has no true supporting evidence.
 
Public opinion is not a determinate on whether or not democracies will go to war, because
if democracies did care about public opinion then they would care about being peaceful and
having good relationships with all countries not just other democracies.
 
This is an interesting point but also very valid. Often times democratic countries only
communicate with other democratic counties, and if they do communicate with
nondemocratic counties, they do it in an effort of forcing their views on other countries.
Two great examples of this that I can think of are Vietnam and more recently in Libya.