Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
REGION VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF BAYBAY CITY
BAYBAY CITY SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Project Title:

Safeguarding Students Academic

performance through Various
Evaluation Delivered (SAVED)
Project SAVED

Proponent: Anna Larissa A. Bargamento

Date of 1st Version: March 11, 2019
Date of 2nd Version: January 25, 2022

Approved for Implementation:

Name of Proponent: Anna

ROGER O. LINGATONG Larissa A. Bargamento
Principal IV

Date: ______________________

0
Project Title: Safeguarding Students Academic performance through Various
Evaluation Delivered (SAVED)

Project Time-frame: Whole Year Round

Name Title Role Phone Number Email Address

Roger O. Principal Head of 09176369561 roger.lingatong@deped.gov.ph
Lingatong IV the Project
Estela A. Asst. Leads in 09153577616 estela.suarez2002@yahoo.com
Suarez Principal the
II collection
of data
from the
departmen
t heads
Anna ABM 09063952604 annarias200@gmail.com
Larissa A. Dept.
Bargamento Head
Rowena A&D 09757706843 rowenaamor.fernandez@
Amor T. Dept. deped.gov.ph
Fernandez Head
Collects
Emily M. GA 09675060355 emily.tabudlong@
data from
Tabudlong Dept. deped.gov.ph
the
Head
teachers in
Celestino I. HUMSS 09678268323 celestino.sapilerjr@deped.
the
Sapiler, Jr. Dept. gov.ph
departmen
Head
t
Noel V. STEM 09700683389 nmoscatiles@gmail.com
Moscatiles Dept.
Head
Beth TVL 09052608347 bethcatherine.dongon@deped.
Catherine Dept. gov.ph
M. Dongon Head
I. Project Contacts

II. Project Summary

Project SAVED is focused primarily on decreasing the number of failing students per quarter
based on the reports of the subject teachers. It has been noticed that a good number of

1
students have been seen to be failing in several subjects offered per semester. In order to
mitigate this perennial problem of the school, this program will employ a series of activities
through the implementation of remediation by giving various evaluations to be given to the
students by the subject teachers that will help them pass a certain subject. The activity
commences with the identification of failing students by the subject teachers. These students
will be contacted by the advisers and the subject teachers to inform them of their status. The
parents are also informed of their children’s status during Portfolio Day and are notified that
their students are given a period of time to comply needed requirements, evaluations and
other forms of evaluations by the subject teachers concern and the advisers. During this time,
the department heads will monitor also the progress of the students’ status. At the end of the
allotted time, the department heads will collect the data of the numbers and percentage of
saved students from the original number of failing students. This project will be conducted
every end of the quarter for the school year. Duration of activity will be 2 to 3 weeks after
end of the quarter. However, follow up activities like meetings, SLAC and workshops will be
conducted to assess and strengthen the implementation of the project.

III. Project Background

It has been perennially observed and noted that there is a number of failing students based on
the submissions of the subject teachers after each end of a quarter. Varied reasons were
accounted; from delayed submissions of requirements to non-submissions of weekly outputs,
from non-compliance of the weekly assessment to very low assessment scores. Other reasons
were on the transportation expenses, on the absence of guardians to retrieve or submit their
outputs and on the schedule of some learners being working students. The need to save the
academic standing of the students becomes the driving force of this project. Reducing the
number of failing students will lessen also the number of students with back subjects.

Remediation in a way is reteaching certain concepts needed to be learned by the students who
are in a way are lagging behind (Madison, 2021). Remediation is also done in order to close
the disparity between the learners know and what they are expected to know (Rawe, n.d.)
Based on the study of Asio and Jimenez (2020), it was observed that remediation has a
significant impact on the academic performance of the Grade 5 pupils on their TLE subject.
Furthermore, it was observed that remediation activities can be utilized not only in the

2
elementary levels but also in the junior and senior high school students. The activities help
students strengthen their learning.

IV. Project Objectives

This project aims primarily to decrease the number of failing students per grading period.

Specifically, it tries to achieve the following objectives:

1. Track the number of failing students per quarter/grading period in every subject
offered,
2. Conduct remediation by delivering various evaluation methods in specific
competencies where students are failing
3. Track the number and percentage of students passing after the remediation period.
4. Identify the subject areas and strands has the greatest number of lagging and failing
students.
5. Formulate strategies and activities to strengthen RRE in school to further help in the
decrease of lagging and failing students.

V. Project Methodology

Project SAVED intends mainly to decrease the number of failing students per grading period
in the different subjects offered through remediation in a 2 to 3 week period of time. The
diagram below shows the flow of the procedures to be undertaken every conduct of the
activity.

3
 Tracking and identification of lagging and failing students by subject teachers
Contacting students and parents via message by the advisers and the subject teachers
Stage 1 Information dissemination to parents of learners' status during Portfolio Day

Remediation of lagging and failing students through various modes of evaluation

activities for 1 to 2 weeks
Monitoring of department heads on the progress of students via subject teachers per
Stage 2 department/ strand.

tracking of the number and percentage of students saved or passed after the remediation
period
Stage 3 identification of subject areas with the greatest number of lagging or failing students

Formulating strategies to strengthen remediation, reinforcement and enhancement on the

subject areas identified
Crafting SIM in these subject areas particularly on the competencies needing RRE
Stage 4 through workshops during SLAC sessions

4
A. Work Breakdown and Task Time Estimates

Stages Activities Time Allotment

Tracking and identification
of lagging and failing
students by subject teachers
Contacting students and
parents via message by the
1 2 weeks
advisers and the subject
teachers
Information dissemination to
parents of learners' status
during Portfolio Day
Remediation of lagging and
failing students through
various modes of evaluation
activities for 1 to 2 weeks
2 1 week
Monitoring of department
heads on the progress of
students via subject teachers
per department/ strand.
tracking of the number and
percentage of students saved
or passed after the
remediation period
3 1 week
identification of subject
areas with the greatest
number of lagging or failing
students
Formulating strategies to
strengthen remediation,
reinforcement and
enhancement on the subject
areas identified
4 4 weeks
Crafting SIM in these
subject areas particularly on
the competencies needing
RRE through workshops
during SLAC sessions

5
B. Project Deliverables and Risk Management

Stage Deliverables Risks Risks Analysis Degree of Remarks

(low,moderate, Occurrence
high)
1  Grade sheets Late High Most likely Department
 List of submission heads must
lagging monitor
students Non- Low Unlikely teachers’
 List of least submission submission
learned of of
competencies deliverables deliverables
per quarter
2  Report on the No report High Likely Department
remediation No heads to
activity remediation Medium Likely monitor the
done conduct of
remediation
 Monitoring Monitoring and observe
checklist of checklist Medium Least likely how the
department available process is
heads implement-
ted
3  Tracking Late High Most likely Department
record of the submission heads must
number and monitor
percentage of teachers’
passing submission
students of
 Record of deliverables
subject areas per quarter
Non-
with the submission Low Unlikely
greatest of
number of deliverables
lagging or
failing
students
4  Action or SH will
Implementa- Integration Low Unlikely initiate on
tion plan of of the plan the
the strategies in the SIP integration
to strengthen of the plan
RRE in on the SIP
school to be
integrated in
the SIP/AIP Department
 SIMs to Likely heads to
Non- Moderate
address the spearhead
submission on the
least learned by subject crafting of

6
 skills of the area SIM
subjects
concerned Tapping
some
experienced
teachers to
mentor on
the crafting
of the SIM
during
SLAC
sessions

VI. Project Costs

Stages Activities Budget Source of Fund

Requirement
Tracking and identification of
lagging and failing students by None
subject teachers
Contacting students and parents via
1 message by the advisers and the None
subject teachers
Information dissemination to parents
of learners' status during Portfolio None
Day
Remediation of lagging and failing
students through various modes of
evaluation activities for 1 to 2 weeks None
2
Monitoring of department heads on
the progress of students via subject
teachers per department/ strand.
tracking of the number and
percentage of students saved or
passed after the remediation period
3 None
identification of subject areas with
the greatest number of lagging or
failing students
Formulating strategies to strengthen
remediation, reinforcement and
enhancement on the subject areas
4 identified P 10,000.00 MOOE
Crafting SIM in these subject areas
particularly on the competencies
needing RRE during SLAC

7
References

Asio, J. M. (2020, 5 4). Effect of Remediation Activities on Grade 5 Pupils’ Academic

Performance in Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE). Retrieved from
Pedagogical Research, 5(4), em0075: https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/8464
Madison, M. (2021, June 24). Acceleration vs. Remediation vs. Intervention: What’s the
Difference? Retrieved from edmentum.com: https://blog.edmentum.com/acceleration-
vs-remediation-vs-intervention-whats-difference
Rawe, J. (n.d.). What are remedial programs? Retrieved from Understood.org:
https://www.understood.org/articles/en/remedial-programs-what-you-need-to-know

Submitted by:

ANNA LARISSA A. BARGAMENTO

Master Teacher II

Noted by:

ESTELA A. SUAREZ
Assistant Principal II

Approved by:

ROGER O. LINGATONG
Principal IV