Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Airvana Femtocell White Paper Oct 2007
Airvana Femtocell White Paper Oct 2007
Consumers continue to replace fixed line calling with mobile minutes – and in the case of
younger callers, mobile phones are increasingly their only phones. In fact, callers under
the age of 24 make up to four-fifths of their long distance calls on wireless networks (see
Figure 1). What stands in the way of making the mobile phone the primary phone for the
rest of the demographic? Fundamentally, consumers want great voice quality, reliable
service, and low prices. But today’s mobile phone networks often provide poor indoor
coverage and expensive per-minute pricing. In fact, with the continued progress in
broadband VoIP offerings such as Vonage and Skype, wireless operators are at a serious
disadvantage in the home.
Figure 1: Wireless – wireline substitution, Source: Yankee Group 2006 TAF Survey
Femtocells
A new class of small “base stations” has emerged, called femtocells (sometimes written as
two words, i.e. “femto cells”). These devices are the size of a DSL router or cable modem
and provide indoor wireless coverage to mobile phones using existing broadband Internet
connections (see Figure 2). They will be:
Low-cost – Femtocells will be offered as a consumer purchase through mobile operators.
User-installed – Like cable modems and DSL routers, femtocells will be installed by
consumers and activated through service providers.
Low-power – Femtocells will transmit at 10-100 milliwatts, similar to Wi-Fi access points.
Broadband-connected – Femtocells utilize Internet protocol (IP) and flat base station
architectures, and will connect to mobile operator networks via a wired broadband Internet
service such as DSL, cable, or fiber optics.
Femto Cell
Access
Macro Cell
Access Internet
Mobile Operator
Core Network
For end users, femtocells will solve a number of existing problems and enable new
applications and services:
Increased indoor coverage – Most femtocells will cover a radius of 50-200 meters. In
most homes, this can provide “five bars” of coverage throughout the household.
Higher performance data – Unlike macro cells that support hundreds of users, femtocells
will support 4-6 simultaneously active users. As a result, femtocell-based EV-DO and
HDSPA connections will have less contention and deliver higher data rates per user than in
the macro cellular environment.
Improved multimedia experience – With higher performance data, femtocells will deliver
a better multimedia experience with music, photos, and live video to laptops, smartphones,
and feature phones.
Better quality voice – In addition to the obvious voice quality gains attributed to better
coverage, femtocells will enable support for a new generation of higher rate voice codecs
that leverage fewer users per access point and the proximity of the handset to the
femtocell.
Enhanced emergency services – Because femtocells will know their location, emergency
services will find it easier to locate callers seeking emergency services.
Converged mobile VoIP services – By using VoIP technologies, many femtocells will be
able to connect existing fixed line phones as well as mobile phones.
With the increase in mobile usage, operators are forced to plan for increased capacity and
coverage. But they continue to wrestle with several fundamental and on-going problems.
Site acquisition is expensive – Increasing existing macro cell densities can solve some of
these problems, but site acquisition is problematic and has long been a major expense and
stumbling block for operator build-outs. Nearly 50% of the cost of constructing a macro cell
network is the cost of site acquisition. In Europe where the density of GSM sites is already
high, acquisition of additional sites is highly regulated. In the US, many communities
negotiate long and hard to control cell site location and visual impact.
Denser cells mean more backhaul – Smaller cells such as micro cells and pico cells can
improve coverage and capacity, but deployment can be a political challenge. Instead of
large tower sites, access to utility poles and other common utility structures must be
secured and provided with power and network backhaul. Resulting deployments can be
uneven, require considerable manpower to install, and need widespread and potentially
expensive backhaul facilities.
Indoor coverage is a stumbling block – In the GSM market, operators transitioning to
UMTS networks are discovering that indoor coverage is more difficult to achieve with
current cell densities. UMTS typically operates at higher frequencies, making it more
difficult to penetrate building walls. In addition, UMTS’ transition from low-speed SMS to
higher-speed multimedia increases the demand for consistent mobile broadband coverage.
Among CDMA operators, new applications such as push-to-talk and the burgeoning growth
of corporate laptop Internet access require blanket coverage to be effective.
Existing phones must be supported – The widespread deployment of Wi-Fi access
points has spurred the development of Wi-Fi fixed mobile convergence (FMC) solutions –
technology that allows dual-mode phones with both Wi-Fi and cellular radios to access
mobile operator networks. But these early FMC solutions will not support existing cellular
handsets in either UMTS or CDMA markets.
Many of the challenges facing mobile operators can be addressed by femtocells. As the
technology rolls out, carriers stand to reap significant benefits from femtocell deployment
(see Table 1).
Increased network capacity – With customers installing femtocells, operators will relieve
stress on macro cell networks and increase the overall capacity of mobile operator
networks. Each femto represents up to 4-6 calls offloaded from the macro cell radio
network for roughly a third of each day.
Lower capital costs – Even as the number of subscribers in a mobile operator’s network
increases, the introduction of femtocells will reduce the capital spent per user on new
macro cell equipment.
Expanded revenue opportunities – With excellent coverage and superior broadband
wireless performance, mobile multimedia services will increase in popularity, raising
average revenue per user (ARPU).
Lower backhaul costs – The cost of backhauling traffic to the operator’s core network will
be handled by the user via DSL, cable, or fiber access lines without any cost to the
operator.
The combination of femtocells and wired IP broadband will yield a new generation of
wireless network – the hybrid mobile network. Previously, macro cell networks were owned
and operated end-to-end by mobile operators. As private networks, they were inherently
secured by the operating practices, equipment, and leased line services.
Hybrid mobile operator networks, on the other hand, will utilize a combination of network
transport services, some owned and controlled by the operator, and some not. As
femtocells are deployed, operators will re-use large scale elements of their current core
networks such as billing, authentication, authorization, accounting (AAA), policy, and
mobility services. But the use of the Internet as a backhaul network will cause a
fundamental architectural change for mobile operators.
Because femtocells will use any residential IP broadband connection, customers will be
plugging femtocells into the Internet via cable modems and DSL routers. This will put
increased emphasis on another category of products – security and mobility gateways – to
protect the integrity of operators’ core networks from the public environment of the Internet,
to protect the integrity of users’ traffic, and to support seamless transitions between the
macro and femtocell networks.
To meet that need, a new generation of high-performance security and mobility gateways
has emerged. Designed to handle very large numbers of encrypted tunnels and to manage
handoffs between macro cell and Wi-Fi networks, such gateways will become critical
anchor points for the security of femtocells and a fundamental element in future mobile
networks (see Figure 3).
CDMA Device
Wi-Fi
Access
Mobile Operator
Core Network Security & Mobility
Gateway
Femtocell Enablers
4B
Why have femtocells suddenly become a viable element in the evolution of mobile
networks? Three market and technology advances have led to this shift.
Widespread wired broadband – Widespread availability of DSL, cable, and fiber optic
broadband have opened the door for femtocell deployment scenarios. Because customers
are already utilizing broadband Internet, femtocells can be deployed anywhere there is a
residential broadband IP service.
Low-cost processors – The recent availability of low-cost, powerful field programmable
gate arrays (FPGAs) and digital signal processors (DSPs) has allowed complex base
station software to be run on very small platforms. FPGAs have traditionally been the basis
of high-end network equipment with parts costing upwards of a $1,000 each, but prices
have been on a steep decline. According to the FPGA Journal, FPGA costs per 1000
gates fell by 97% between 1998 and 2005. In addition, FGPAs now offer the option of
conversion to even lower-cost application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs).
Flat architectures – Because powerful processing can be applied to low-cost femtocells,
network software stacks can be substantially collapsed. In addition, the standard Internet
protocol (IP) has rapidly replaced hierarchic telecom-specific transmission protocols. The
combination of collapsed software stacks and IP transport enable femtocells to utilize flat
networks – such as the Internet – as a backhaul transport to operator core networks (see
Figure 4).
Hierarchical
Mobile Operator
Core Network
Flat
PDSN
-or-
Internet
S/GGSN
RNC
BTS
Though the technology has advanced quickly, a number of challenges still need to be
addressed to make femtocells successful as high-volume products. Because each
represents an area of innovation, many will become significant aspects of competition and
differentiation among femto access point suppliers.
Radio interference mitigation – Unlike macro cellular installations where the RF coverage
can be manually tuned and optimized by technicians over a long period of time, femtocells
will need to sense the radio environment around them from the moment they are plugged in
by the consumer. Femtocells will then need to mitigate potential interference by
dynamically adjusting for two typical scenarios.
• Macro-femto interference. Though they are statically configured, macro cell RF
densities and through-wall penetration will be unpredictable and will vary depending on
where a femtocell is installed. Though operators will understand the general RF
footprint of their macro cell deployments, they will have no control over where their end
customers will deploy femtocells. The femtocells must adjust themselves to avoid
interference in macro cell networks.
• Femto-femto interference. As many consumers install their own femtocells, the RF
environment will become more complex. Femtocells will begin to impact other
femtocells, particularly in urban multi-tenant environments but also in some densely
packed suburban situations. When a neighbor installs a new femtocell, other femtocells
must adjust their transmissions to control interference.
6BConclusion
Femtocells will change the mobile industry. Operators will use femtocells to build a new
generation of lower cost, flat architecture networks that can utilize the Internet as backhaul
and deliver expanded capacity for customers. This hybrid mobile network will yield an
improved platform for new mobile multimedia services, higher revenue, and new
technology introduction.
Femtocells will also change the mobile broadband experience for customers. Excellent
wireless coverage in the home will become the norm and not the exception. Femtocells will
raise the bar for high performance broadband wireless and customers will expand the utility
of mobile broadband devices.
Airvana is headquartered in Chelmsford, MA, USA. For more information, please visit the
company's Web site at http://www.airvana.com .
H H