Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UDHR and The Constitution of India - A Comparison: Mid Term Assignment Human Rights Submitted To: Dr. Saim Farooqui
UDHR and The Constitution of India - A Comparison: Mid Term Assignment Human Rights Submitted To: Dr. Saim Farooqui
Comparison
II
INTRODUCTION
“Laws change. Universal truths are constant. What is true and right is true and right
for all. White and black alike.”
- Brad Pitt (12 Years a Slave)
Human Rights are inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled
simply because she or he is a human being. Human Rights are thus conceived as universal
and egalitarian. At the international level human rights have become a movement. It can be
studied through many ways which is called as the constituents of Human Rights. They may
be civil rights, political, economic, cultural, social rights.
They are also called somewhere Fundamental Rights. Being a humankind, one must have
some rights from birth and hence they are the birth rights of every human being. They are
also the rights of freedom to everyone irrespective of caste, creed, sex, region, colour,
profession, etc.
The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 defines Human Rights as: “human rights”
means the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual
guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in the International Covenants and
enforceable by courts in India”.1
Protection of human rights is essential for the development of the people of the country,
which ultimately leads to development of the national. The Constitution of India guarantees
basic human rights to every citizen of the country. The framers of the Constitution have put
their best efforts in putting down the necessary provisions. However, with continuous
developments taking place, the horizon of human rights has also expanded. The
parliamentarians are now playing a great role in recognizing the rights of people and passing
statues, amending provisions etc. as and when required.
III
DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RIGTHS IN INDIA
Evolution of Human Rights in India can be traced back to the fifteenth century B.C from
Vedas. It is to be noticed that India embedded the concept of human rights from the time
immemorial and the same rights were discovered by the west later. The wide range of stories
and judicial pronouncement showed the concept of human rights and in Vedic period human
rights were deemed to be equality.
Ancient Period
There are several Vedas which throw light on human rights. The famous Vedic quote “let
everyone be happy, let everyone free from all ills” which expected the king not only to
protect the lives of the people also to promote human well-being and prosperity. Kautilya had
pleaded with the king to protect the rights of the people and the dignity of the people.
Arthasatra not only dealt with civil and political rights formulated by Manu but also included
several economic rights for the people.
Buddhism and Jainism protected the moral order and dignity of the people. After Buddha,
1
Section 2(1)(d)
IV
Ashoka policy of non-violence made him protect the Human rights which include equality,
fraternity, happiness, and liberty of the individuals. People enjoyed many rights in the Hindu
Empire. Ashoka secured freedom from hunger, disease, deprivation and prohibit torture and
inhuman treatment of the prisoners.
The ancient period developed the common ideas to enlarge unity and harmony irrespective of
race, colour, language, religion, gender etc. Most of the Vedas and Smritis stated that the
whole world was one family. The ancient jurisprudence abundantly encouraged freedom,
equality, and liberty for all people.
Medieval Period
Medieval India was popularly known as the Muslim period or Muslim era. During the Pre-
Mughal period, Hindus were forced to adopt their culture and religious practices. But, in later
Muslim period it is considerably changed and modified to its form. During the rule of Akbar,
the great, he brought many changes towards the Hindus to practice their own religion. It can
be clearly seen that “Human Right policy of universal reconciliation and tolerance” was
followed by the ruler and the same was followed by his son Jahangir.
The right of an accused to be released on bail existed during the Mughal period, similarly, the
accused can be acquitted on the benefit of the doubt. Bhakti movement emerged in India, it
regenerated truth, righteousness, justice, and morality.
British Period
The modern developments of human rights in India emerged during the British period. The
torture made by the British against Indians induced the Indians to protest the rule of Britishers
and encouraged the freedom fighters for the freedom movement to safeguard their liberties
and fundamental rights and freedoms. The national movement emphasised by Gandhiji not
only to free India from foreign rule but also to abolish the practice of Sati, untouchability,
Harijan’s rights etc.
The movement is for the fundamental freedom and civil and political rights for the people.
The objective of the Indian national congress, in the beginning, is to secure liberties, human
rights of non-discrimination on grounds of race, colour etc.
Raja Ram Mohan Roy and Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar stood against the violence against
women in India including ‘sati paratha’, child marriage and other outbreaks of violence.
They criticised discrimination made against women. Vidyasagar took several efforts to
remove legal obstacles for widow remarriage through legislation in 1856 and played a vital
role in promoting education for girl children.
‘Arya Samaj’ and Ramakrishna mission in 1899 were struggling for promoting education
for all the sections of the society. Human rights and fundamental freedoms are the only things
for the Indians to fight against the Britishers.
V
The proclamation of Queen Victoria on 1st November 1858 declared the secular nature of the
state and non-interference in religious practices.
In 1927, a committee was set up under the chairmanship of Pt. Motilal Nehru. The
committee suggested 19 fundamental rights be incorporated in the constitution of India. The
Constitution of India 1950 incorporated 10 fundamental rights suggested under the
committee. In 1946, Jawaharlal Nehru passed the objective resolution which contained most
of the human rights and it guaranteed safeguard for minorities, backward classes, tribal
people, oppressed and other classes in the country.
In 1945, Sapru Committee3 asked for the written codes for fundamental rights and after
several debates, the fundamental rights and directive principles of state policy were
incorporated in the Indian constitution.
India got its independence on August 15, 1947, but it was incomplete and on 10th December
1948, when the constitution of India was in making the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights was adopted.
VI
UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
The traumatic events of the Second World War brought home that human rights are not
always universally respected. The extermination of almost 17 million people during the
Holocaust, including 6 million Jews, horrified the entire world. After the war, governments
worldwide made a concerted effort to foster international peace and prevent conflict. This
resulted in the establishment of the United Nations in June 1945.
In 1948, representatives from the 50 member states of the United Nations came together
under the guidance of Eleanor Roosevelt4 to devise a list of all the human rights that
everybody across the world should enjoy.
On 10 December 1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations announced the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) - 30 rights and freedoms that belong to
all of us. Seven decades on and the rights they included continue to form the basis for all
international human rights law.
Eleanor Roosevelt was heavily involved in championing civil rights and social activism. She
2
https://www.constitutionofindia.net/historical_constitutions/the_constitution_of_india_bill unknown 189
5 1st%20January%201895
3
https://advocatetanmoy.com/2021/10/14/sapru-committee-report-1945/
4
First Lady of the United States 1933-1945
VII
was appointed chair of the UN Commission on Human Rights which drafted the UDHR.
The UDHR marked an important shift by daring to say that all human beings are free and
equal, regardless of colour, creed, or religion. For the first time, a global agreement put
human beings, not power politics, at the heart of its agenda.
The 30 rights and freedoms set out in the UDHR include the right to asylum, the right to
freedom from torture, the right to free speech and the right to education. It includes civil
and political rights, like the right to life, liberty, free speech, and privacy. It also includes
economic, social, and cultural rights, like the right to social security, health, and education.5
VIII
SPIRIT OF THE CONSTITUTION
It is important to remember the Preamble to the Indian Constitution in order to understand the
true spirit of the Constitution. The preamble reads -
We, the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign
Socialist Secular Democratic Republic and to secure to all its citizens:
Fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the nation;
In our constituent assembly, this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do hereby adopt, enact
and give unto ourselves this Constitution.
Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity are the four fundamental pillars of the Constitution.
The wordings have attained a status of a touchstone that is used by the Indian courts wherever
the intent and purport of a particular Act is question.
In the Keshavananda Bharathi6 case, a majority of the full bench of the Supreme Court held
that the objectives specified in the preamble contain the basic structure of the Constitution
which cannot be amended in exercise of the power under Article 368 (amendment to
Constitution). From then on, Indian courts have held the Preamble as containing the basic
structure of the Constitution and have used it to validate an act or its provisions as
constitutional or unconstitutional.
Through Indira Gandhi Election Case7, Minerva Mills Case8 and Waman Rao Case9,
Supreme Court of India has clarified the basic feature of the Constitution and held that they
are
5
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/universal-declaration-human-rights-UDHR
6
Keshavananda Bharathi v. State of Kerala, [1973 SC, 1461]
7
975 AIR 1590 1975 SCC (2) 159
8
AIR 1980 SC 1789
9
(1981) 2 SCC 362, 1981 2 SCR 1
IX
beyond the power of parliament to amend even though the parliament had such power under
Art 368.
Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution are of special relevance in the context of upholding
human rights. These articles concern with the power of Supreme Court and High Court to
issue certain writs.
In incorporating them into the letter and spirit of the Constitution, they also made certain
fundamental rights like Right to Life, absolutely non-derivable than through due process of
law. Later, in Keshavananda Bharathi, Menaka Gandhi, and a couple of more cases referred
earlier, the Supreme Court of India expanded the Right to Life into ‘Right to Life with
dignity’.
The import of such an interpretation is truly unique in the annals of Constitutional Law
anywhere in the world.
X
(abolition of untouchability); and Art.
16(2) (employment discrimination on
the basis of religion, race, caste, sex,
descent, place of birth, and
residence), as limited by Art 16(3)-
16(5).
10. Right to a fair public hearing Art 20, 21, 22, 39A
by independent tribunal
Right to presumption of
11. innocence until proven guilty at
public trial with all guarantees Art 20, 21,22, 39A
necessary for defense
XI
12. Right to privacy in home, Though not specific, Art 21
family and is invoked
correspondence
16. Right to marriage and family and Covered by separate Acts, specific to
to equal rights of men and cultures and religions.
women during and after Marriage
XII
20. Freedom of Association Art. 19(1) (b) (freedom of peaceful
and assembly assembly), as limited by Art. 19(3)
(reasonable restrictions to advance
national security).
21. Right to take part in and select There are numerous provisions,
government throughout the text of the
Constitution, including those relating
to election of the President, local
village committees (Panchayats), and
detailed rules for elections, eligibility
for public service, etc.
XIII
Each person has responsibilities
29. to the community and others as Art 48A, Art 51A
essential for a democratic society
30. Repression in the name of rights Art 32, 32 A, 33-35, Art 226
is unacceptable.
XIV
CONCLUSION
The Constitution of India has absorbed and reflected the basic spirit and intent of the
important provisions of UDHR, thereby reflecting the will of the Indian State in being a part
of the wider comity of nations to promote Human Rights and Justice everywhere, not merely
in words but in its spirit. The provisions of the Constitution are part of a dream that the
founder-fathers of India shared. The dream of a world where all humans will enjoy their
freedoms guaranteed by the collective will of the people.
XV