GURU GHASIDAS UNIVERSITY, BILASPUR

SCHOOL OF LAW

SUBJECT:
MOOT COURT EXERCISE AND INTERNSHIP

DIARY NO. I:

COURT VISIT

SUBMITTED BY:

UDIT BHATIA

B.COM LL.B 10TH SEM.

ROLL NO: 15002053

ENROLL NO: GGV/15/2022

 NDEX
CoURT DrARY
Cex4iicate o Internghip.
RCourt Visit -Day One-Writ Petien 26/5/2020-
- Odei o High loutCoey
3.Virtual Heani- Day Two Cyriin 24/5/2020
Order o iigalóurt [Coey]
H,Virtal CourtHeaing -Day Tree -WritPaian(iile3/ ke
Order oHighCurt [Copy
S. Virtal CotHearig-Day FouT -(iminol %/0s/220
- Order Hih C&at _llopy
K Vrtual Curt Heaslg-Dayfve imina 10/0 P/a020
Onder o Hiah lost Lcopy11

Submtted Byi
Udit Batio
Bcem LLB Jo{em
Rollo (So02053

www.PrintablePaper.net
fau Chanhe elSaumya Shama
Advocate at High Court of Chhattsgarh
Mob.9179682788

TOWHOMEIT MAY cONCERN

This is to certify that Mr. Udit Bhatia Son ofLate. Mr. Harish Bhatia a
student of BA.LLB 10 Semesterin Guru Ghasidas University Central
University, School of Law, has warked under my supervision as a intern
during his internship peried from 24.05.2020 to 03.07.2020 at my
chamber.
I found him to be a self starter who is motivated, duty bound && hard
working. He has been punctual at time to report before me day to day
both in physical court & Virtual hearin
I wish him the best of luck for his future

Miss Saumya Shama

Advocate, High Court
of Cthattis3asti
E. w. 211|;e

Roaidence:
12, 1st Floda, CLOP A Aah iher Colo
p Chow Blapeur 49Ko Athok age, apur496001
 Day COne
Couri Visit -26/05/2020
Tvesday-
1cu1t Koo_No._2 No.6 Hah Lourt e lhha

.Benh o -Hon ble Justice ootam Ghadri.

3Mode oHeaung Phsical Heasung.

iCase No NPS 1950 2020

5C0se lyoe -writ Petton, Sevvice

Sec hiom/a ticle Asticle R6 (onstitutiem o

adia.

Lae Stasus Disposed c

8Counse 4r Petiant1 Ms laumya Shama
9.LounSe er Resgended_a- s . Richa Shukla.
ObgevodLeu
mtte wa s Hed beere Court no.b eHigth
Lourt he CouYt cleyk calleoHhe Seríol e e_
Hhe_mofer_

www.PrintablePaper.net

P.T.O
 Back qoumd the Cose -
he peLones k.k_chamdrevamsi wa pofed a
deve lopnemt _x leian e er Patam Dist. Durg
His His date o Rirtmêmi_wa 30. 6. 2020,
he petioner wous atven Hne bemegit One
Aanua inirtmeAtSiace id was giveaa to oters
Similon Ritusthens he peTLUsAeAmade h
bt prtentolue_but wa Mt decided by the _uthont
ies
rayey by lougel
eliedon Judeneia ivN Lase _e M.R.kujur v/e
State o C.n oths DaAea i4/119The uvgel
or dhepetione pYayed in eAi Judge
That b0d ea the above memtiened,rdey tnu
RJudaeent in Hhe Cose alo hhich is similan iy
nature md dct Hhe_LeAlernedAuthorities p_
decide Hhe Said ReprtAtoÉLea
roler Held
a t Hne petuiemer should make a desh rtprkn-
ttenelore fh_lonCexMed_clepaitmeMt
ithinaa 'period _o 3 daus And alteruerd
o thin a period o 9o dau hus eprlaatateg
naA hedecided ey line_lonterued Autlaority
he prtitea sdads dipaed o

www.PrintablePaper.net
 NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPS No. 1950 of 2020
K.K. Chandravanshi S/o Shri Hriday Ram Chandravanshi Aged About
62 Years R/o Plot No. 2, Sector 1, Umda Road, Vishwa Bank Colony
Bhilai-3, District Durg Chhattisgarh,
-- Petitioner

Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of
Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan,
Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Patan, District Durg
Chhattisgarh,
Respondents

Ms. Saumya Sharma, Advocate

For Petitioner
Neb Co
For Respondents/State Mrs. Richa Shukla, Dy. G.A.

igh Court of ChattisHon'gle

gagh Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
Bilaspu
26/05/2020
1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that the

petitioner was working on a post of Development Extension Officer,

Patan Distt. Durg Chhattisgarh. He has been served with a letter

dated 03.01.2020 that he is going to be retired on 30.06.2020. The

contention of the petitioner is that he has not been given the benefit

the benefit of
of one annual increment payable to him, therefore,

increment has not been granted. Since in the similar facts situation,
the
the henefit has heen aiven to the other likewise emnlovees
 yet been decided, therefore, the concerned authorities may be

directed to decide the said representation.

2. Considering the fact that the representation has already been made

vide Annexure P/4 which has not been decided, the petitioner is

given a liberty to make a fresh representation along with the relevant

copy of the order of the High Court within a period of 30 days from

today, so that his case may be considered and if such a

representation is filed, the concerned authority i.e. Respondent No.

2 (Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Patan) may decide

the same within a further period of 90 days.

Nebc
3. With the aferesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed off.

igh Court of Chhattisgarh

Sd/

Bilaspu (Goutam Bhaduri)

Judge
Vishakha
 Day Twwo
Couxi/isit 24/05/2020
Westnesday

1Countkoom No. -No. High (curt Chhatisaaah

R.Bench o Hon'ble Smt.Justite Rajani Dubey.
Mode Hcooudng irtual Heoug
LLCae no MCRC No. 503/2020
MCRC o, i013/2020
5.Case ye- :- imima,i s c

Sections Lnvslved 354L 363366 Sog B,

34o IPC Sectien R o
Pocso Acf

Cose StatUS Choxgecheet_hoa been iled

Tial Pemding.
8.Counsel or Applicani Ns. Soumya Shakma
Dun Sel ln RespOndent Mr Roghvendhta Vexma.

IQbseY vouay
his mafter idas pemding helere(out no8
bench Hon'hle JustikRyani Dubey Due_
to CovID19 sitvate thematttx s taken
www.PrintablePaper.net
 ackqyound he lase he allegatanuPeA
tHhe applitamiaA thad_he hay elaed tae lonmplasau
Hanf dauguter he Lomplaunaast had locdged a -
FJR againt Hhe OpplicamtadHn Hhe Sdadtmeaat thot
hen_SMe_was eae_ n neanlky plale, lsale_otSae
house She vai kidnapge by fhe pplitavts asad
ok her wa n he legal wancamiue the
LOmplaanat i.ë her athex,Tus Lwoulo osmounaf ta
c 63,366 ALBAg ith ec 4_0CSO.
aDUYnd ar Koai
Te (ouMe oY_Applitat have led tus bo
applitatisn Moler Section UR) He lrPC.as_

ne (emplainaLAa lalbituo Lamplainast

Hhey haM_oolged (emplaint pnid tO Haiu lomplanT
athe Sameslice ctatea
-here as akcady adpute getilemeAst lwhe
_analkea, withl Hhe (enfmt e bata heg
Madeam a4cemed beore e_pollce stat
Wa LAarcerneat Bpreested belart lhe leurt
he Cemplaunew m ade o eK TOYt a0e4 {n
Hae appkcamt havt heem alely implicated Hhem
Toe emare pusecuien smiy appeang to ke ale
aad f vilous oMd it wa od edolue to peoo
llyem doGta

lnet_wJa Mo indepeandesat itmes to hisincdlet,

Nabody ha ceea Hae iacidlest Nobody haseuta4
www.PrimablePeper.netëAdthe_SCeemiag. e
 he pmiecutrix A XCLovexed hey relati
houKe by hexather h o lid neorhy he
LhousR

She hAs Made impe mentt io her Qtatermesty

evera Hme
The Applitaiane otemd er_age 0ntacins
Social ShanMG

der
Havina heano iheCounsel hoth the partieg
osidting Hhe totaluta aacs he Hep he
ualgecxdered to relebsehe appelicant am
TgilanballAcLLdinslytheiapplicatea
led uades S. 139 Cfcwai alexed

www.PrintablePaper.net
 NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH.BILASPUR

MCRC No.503 of 2020
Bhagwat Jaiswal S/o Shiv Prasad Jaiswal Aged About 23 Years
Resident Of Village- Bodtarakala, Chowki- Chilpi, Police Station
Lormi, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh
- - Petitioner

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Station- Lormi,

District Lormi Chhattisgarh

- Respondent

MCRC No. 1013 of 2020

Johnson KJna S/o Ayodhya Prasad Nishad Aged About 19 Years R/
o Village Bodtarakala, Chowki Chilp, Police Station Lormi, District
Mungeli, Chhattisgarh
e b

-Petitioner

Versus
igh Court of Chhatiscarh
State Qf Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station
ormi, District: Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

Biiaspu -Respondent

For Applicants : Ms. Saumya Sharma, Advocate

For Resporden/S:ate Mr. Raghvendra Verma, G.A.

Hon'bie Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

Order On osrd

27/05/2020
As both these Il.CUs. eise out of the same crime number

they are heirg disposed of by this common order.

 station Lormi, District Mungeli, (CG) for the offence punishable
under Sections 354, 363, 366, 506 B, 34 of IPC and
Section 8 of
POCSO Act.

Case of tne prosecuion in brief is that on 14.12.2019 father of

he prosecutrix has lodged an FIR that on the previous evening his

daughler went miss1ng when she went outside to throw the water.

After this incident, the father of the prosecutrix started searching her

nearby his house and on being searched one Lekhram Jaiswal

infomed him, that his daughter was present nearby his house. When

he reached, he found his daughter and she told her father that due to

Some previous enmity accused Bhagwat Jaiswal along with the other
eb
co-accused Johnson Nishad kidnapped her in the motorcycle. Based

on this offence has been registered against them.

n Court of Ch
Counsels for the appi cants submits that the applicants have

Bilas fasely imolicated in the case. It is submitted that the

are in jail since i5.12.2019; the charge sheet has not been filed and
applicants

looking to the conduct of the prosecution it is clear that the trial will

take time for its conciusion.

Cn hce otther hand coinsel for the State opposes the bail

applica.tins.

eving heard counsel tor tne parties, considered the totality of

the fetin particuiar ihe detenuon period of the applicants, am

 i s uirectec thai in the event of applicants' furnishing a

persor.ai bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety each, for

the ike sum to the satisfaction ofthe concerned Court, they shall be

releas on bail.

is nade tiear tnat t h e applicants' have already been

rEaion beil pulsuan to ihe baii bonds already furnishing in view

i r t e uruer pa9ed by ie High Power Committee constituted in

eompiance of tae orcder of the Supreme Court of India dated

23 C3.2020 in the mater of In_Re: Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in

Prisor: (Suo Mote Writ Petition (C) No. 1/2020), they need nod

N e b
iumigh ai: bonds afresh and the bail bonds already furnished shall

be dec.ied to be the bail bonds furnished in compliance of the order

n

vcun 0 ilof tis Court, but if they have not furnished the bail bonds earlier, then

they will be required to furnish bail bonds within four weeks' from

8lasodiny
Sd/-

(Rajani Dubey)
Judge
 Day IhYee
Lourt isit -3 6/2020
vesday
oUrt RoomNo. No.14 High (ourt o Chhatts
Raxh

2Bemch o -Hon'ble Shri Justice_P. Sam

Koshy.
3.Mode oHeasung i u a l Heaung
Cae No PLNo. 1Y2H/2020

5Caelype plit Petntion livil, -

Sectien/icle Aticle 6 e lenstituien
Indaa
oeStotus Pending belore the Hish
Lourt Ldnnot he_Ple& in
Aaather lourt_

&Lounse)ar Pettialer Ms. Samyahaama

9.oungee Respenclent 2-rJitendxa Pali

h mater us Peandiug hetore Hhe Hhgla Last

wwder Hhe_bencl _oHohle Jugtice P San
IKoshy.Due to Hhe(ovID 19 tueliasthe
Aotfer as Adjouhued due to the nature a
ww.PritablePaper.retdisate tilr tae Higa lart Shii physical
hcondg
 ackqoMd fhe Case
he pehaney haA a land nea_ Kama Valey
She had pikchoaed tae land in taat anea
oased n the_ageement Hhat a 100M, DOd
Laloulld ae vided fi her per the master plan
ne pelenti ia_a9qcied ay the acian tote
autiaoxit4 and he"action h/privete rependen
Otuho is a huilder y pyoehien QAd who nakes
ommerr ial Res detialAppantntta_in Hat eanuculas
0Mea And Lallo (hamged he Mastea plaa i1
lcollusio ita thelatr oiciad hati hy the
Hpetithener appached tlhe Hor lole lourt

le Saualr
he pethaner_apmched the Hamhle lourt foeie
ditc tion fo Hne pendent aut ttes F She
Kolat e eile emel prvicle thalo0 Dad er
pwidealteriate_lovMd

Held
e Lout held thot ou thu A_Aale to he
lauean the
dispute_amd Cannat le aNGUed_o Hae Made og
icua heosaingSot is vapasthle to hean Hau
ad jouyUEd

www.PrintablePaper.net
 HIGH COURT OF
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 1427 of 20117
Smt. Kalyani Tiwari Versus State Of Chhattisgart
23.06.2020 Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. AG for the State.

Considering the nature of

dispute, let this matter be listed in due
after High Court starts physical course
hearing.
Sd/
(P. Sam Koshy)
JUDGE

opy
N e b

h Courtof Chihatisgarh

8ilasp

Rohit
 Day FOu
Lcunt_Visit- R6/o6/20R0
Friday
1cuTRoom No. No.4 High (curt Chhotigah
Bench -Hon ble Shri Justice Arvind
Singa_Lhandel.

3Modeo Heaing Vitual Heasin

Case No. MCRCA No.658/20RO

5Cose ype_ (iminol,MiAcAntici poutory

Bail.
6Secdien Tavalved Secdien 438 PC
se Stoudug nder Lnve,tigalien
8LounSel a Applitanti . Saumya Shaxma
9ConSerReeadent r Anand Verma

O bsewvotes

Thus mattes _Jas pendivg beere (ouyt no Y

bemch oHen hle usfce hrvind Singh Chamde
Due to OVLD19 situatuensths maler_w
taken up virtus hmugh Vi tual Lourt_

www.PrintablePaper.net
 Backgrbund o the Cose -
he aeplicamt Puwshoftam_Purohit ii aJournlist by
Preo _aMd_he_publishe autHhentic ews inkarnatusg
e Hhe evblic with Hhé_helpoe news Luannel 4 Socia
Media he applicomt eued the iahamatieaHhat a
uYatane lentex newly _annanged by fhe bovt. oy_
llageSuk hmpara aMa_latthalgaaaWher in man
mlgr evt_wekers _WeYe quanamtinedM Hhe lenter
HeCved the ingrnatsa Hhat te (enter A dertih eall
dasc samgeil hat s eodpLateyå aaitt ne eR.
4tx eceiving Hhe inkohe eached to tie laater tn
kinew fhe lats about Ehe Situaton d Haeir hell
heated angvrmeat ita bae o he odaiuutälie
i e ae Lnplope who LaiathangefA=
Ceatr He tok he inBerview e Mgran wakerS alu
Hhe pmlolem lated lay Hhern, Keaue_ he Aas shain
Hhe lackuna i a aovt weck_in he Neus (hannel
a d oah Sacia medsa aCcoauntlhs Ma Hae
TAsan he utaaimplicated_

he Countel _prayed oelent the Judge at he

Aplicat haa alrtadybeen anneited , Hherttre
HLne agplicatiahs now leLoyme luku huos
he ouMCel Sihmitfedhe appllCantsJoumlstt
clegsee Ahnd payed drat Oa He date opplka
ha ve AE Lor oerimghe Stod4, ZE a s hiu duty_
o hëlp_abli ineipechie a any paLtical-pa
rgure_e ivIvtn Le r thmeat

He ld h e maWerhas becene in ucfoUs e cave a

www.PrintablePaper.net theact dhat HAe agplicamE had alheada bceMaTstE
ukg
24 the paliie amd alke4he Seckiaa Undtrhe dinritpst
e r t e d mertfore ne was aUUted.
 NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

MCRCA No. 658 of 2020
Purushottam Purohit, S/o Shri Heemanchal Purohit, Aged About 30 Years
Occupation Journalist, R/o - Chalta, Police Station Sitapur, District-
Surguja, Chhattisgarh.
-Applicant
Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station Patthalgaon, District-Jashpur

Chhattisgarh.
- Respondent

A e D For
plicant : Ms. Saumya Sharma, Advocate.
ForRespondent/State : Mr. Anand Verma, Dy. G.A.

gh COurt of Chnatisd3Hon'ble ShriJustice Arvind Singh Chandel

Order On Board
23/06/2020
1. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has
already arrested, therefore, the instant application has now become
infructuous.

2. In view of the above submission, the instant application is dismissed

as having become infructuous.

Sdl
(Arvind Singh Chandel)
Judge
Shubham
 Day tiNe
Lount_Visit -10/a/ 2020
Friday
LoU4 Room No. No. High lourt o
Chhalugonh.
2Bendho Hon ble Shri Justice Arvind
Singh_lhan del
3.Mode_Heasing Virtual

Case No. MCRCA No, B35/R020.

5Cose Iype -Misc. (yiminal/Anticipatoy
Boil) 938 o2 Cr.PC,_
6Sectien Iorelved - I.P.C. Sec tien 498 A34
Cae Stotus Pencimg
TMtedT
_Ad iaten
Adiuters
lie

8UnSse Applicanti-Ms. Saumya Sho~wna

ounsee Rezpendent Ms Hamida Siddaui
osexvoLen -

hu mate i la_pemdiughe pere CouYt no,4

beaac h oloible Jushicd vind Sivgh (handel.
Due toCOvID19 Situatiensthic matRI Wa
heosd Vytvally_Adintexim hatl os aMted
www.PrintableFPaper.net0 the 0pplicaut ia tuu mattèr,_
 ackgtuMd the Coe
he applicamt is the gisier in lauw o thelomplai
4A0a1 AMd loeln4 Hhe (ierin law he ha been
mplicateq,alieing he act that She ha
atlped the otther o-acusecd [hexhusannd
otHae in Laus a omplainantt me Husband o
|lompladnant h_UndeGOR SeAd Mua ae OsMd
accoLonplasisaat he applitaat a tuis Case has
a the kuauledge indmateg aMd dspik knoing
Hhe acds she dduat diicloe the 4as p Hhe
laivaa
he (omplainat las made aovenea_in fiK_at
khe has aeem nAANase lou all Hhe aCCUSed aLxiLA
hleng with Hhe_pntLat applitaoat in He name a
Md alo her Musbamd had exramautalaua=
wi Mawy otheY laLOMtM_aAd Helaas alsA Undeig
SLead naizioge ovte whitla lhe alo hed a child
ounds er Latenim Bail
he oumse ec applitaat poCheed belme tlae
Cout oMUnd_ar mMtug_dinterim Kai
ine ae applikhadt he ister in aw and sheho
bEloa livg SApeotely tn then tdn the ver
Mcepia4 hey maiuáge She iving _Aitn htr
huslaandi fme (MH) AMd Hhe Judgeriene
Prerti nwpta
Judgtt in whch Condplainant Aalela Inplicako
HAeSfePx in lam in th hueq Case n adtr to
wita he eaniiefanily latr
usiand And ithet Ann4 2pecic_dlteaateas he
hccuged Cannet le inpfcafeo
www.PrintablePaper.net
En iShe hod all Hhe Knoladlge olbout her dhey
 Haesa also _doeAu ubdantiae_a Cyiml Under
ecdien R A Waicla s he oteate o CYe
ne we_Cas Çeck divDICe _er m maiadeinae
she cam lodge AM fIR Umde S 494 aIPC fr 1Samy,
t t is net Cruel

Held -The Judge aker (eidering the EIR

Statemeaat amd r the YeaNéas metiene
n Hheaplicaea_aloued Hhe_Adinkrim antici-
potoubai.

www.PrintablePaper.net
 HIGH COURT OF
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet

MCRCA No. 835 of 2020

Reeta Moitra, W/o Nirupam Moitra, Aged About 32 Years, Local Address- Plot No. 158
Laxmi Nagar, Risali, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh.
Current Address- A-302, Green Crest Society, Suresh
Nagar, Fursungi Pune, Maharashtra
412308

-Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station- Mahila Thana- Durg, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent

10/07/2020
opy Ms.
Court of ladeaiagjaréheing.
Saumya Shama, Counsel for the Applicant appear through|

Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Dy. G.A. for the State/Respondent appear

8ila Tvidéo conferencing.
Heard on Admission.

Admit.
Call for the case diary.
Also heard on IA No. 02/2020 for grant of Ad-Interim bail.
Theapplicant is apprehending her arrest in connection with Crime|
No.30/2020, registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Distt. Durg|
KC.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 34 of the IPC.

Considering tne FiR statement and for the reasons mentioned in

the application (1A No.02/2020), the same is allowed.

It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant in
 connection with the aforesaid crime, she shall be released on ad interim
anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.
|10,000/- with one solvent surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of
the concerned Investigating Officer. This order shall remain effective for
ten weeks from today. Sd/

List the matter for final hearing in due course.

Sd/
(Arvind Singh Chandel)
Judge

eb
opy
n Court of Chatisgarh

8ilaspu
yasmiin