Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stress Analysis and Optimization of Crankshafts Subject To Dynamic Load
Stress Analysis and Optimization of Crankshafts Subject To Dynamic Load
Abstract - Stress Analysis and Optimization of Crankshafts These improvements result in lighter and smaller engines
Subject to Dynamic Loading The main objective of this study was with better fuel efficiency and higher power output. This
to investigate weight and cost reduction opportunities for a study was conducted on a single cylinder four stroke cycle
forged steel crankshaft. The need of load history in the FEM engine. Two different crankshafts from similar engines were
analysis necessitates performing a detailed dynamic load
studied in this research. The finite element analysis was
analysis. Therefore, this study consists of three major sections:
(1) dynamic load analysis, (2) FEM and stress analysis, (3) performed in four static steps for each crankshaft. Stresses
optimization for weight and cost reduction. In this study a from these analyses were used for superposition with
dynamic simulation was conducted on two crankshafts, cast iron regards to dynamic load applied to the crankshaft. Further
and forged steel, from similar single cylinder four stroke engines. analysis was performed on the forged steel crankshaft in
Finite element analysis was performed to obtain the variation of order to optimize the weight and manufacturing cost. Figure
stress magnitude at critical locations. The pressure-volume 1.1 shows a typical picture of a crankshaft and the
diagram was used to calculate the load boundary condition in nomenclature used to define its different parts.
dynamic simulation model, and other simulation inputs were
taken from the engine specification chart. The dynamic analysis
II. REVIEW
was done analytically and was verified by simulations in ADAMS
which resulted in the load spectrum applied to crankpin bearing. Their study presents a literature survey focused on fatigue
This load was then applied to the FE model in ABAQUS, and performance evaluation and comparisons of forged steel and
boundary conditions were applied according to the engine ductile cast iron crankshafts. In their study, crankshaft
mounting conditions. The analysis was done for different engine
specifications, operation conditions, and various failure
speeds and as a result, critical engine speed and critical region on
the crankshafts were obtained. Stress variation over the engine
sources are discussed. Their survey included a review of the
cycle and the effect of torsional load in the analysis were effect of influential parameters such as residual stress on
investigated. Results from FE analysis were verified by strain fatigue behavior and methods of inducing compressive
gages attached to several locations on the forged steel crankshaft. residual stress in crankshafts. The common crankshaft
Results achieved from aforementioned analysis were used in material and manufacturing process technologies in use
optimization of the forged steel crankshaft. Geometry, material, were compared with regards to their durability performance.
and manufacturing processes were optimized considering This was followed by a discussion of durability assessment
different constraints, manufacturing feasibility, and cost. The procedures used for crankshafts, as well as bench testing and
optimization process included geometry changes compatible with
experimental techniques. In their literature review, geometry
the current engine, fillet rolling, and the use of microalloyed
steel, resulting in 18% weight reduction, increased fatigue
optimization of crankshafts, cost analysis and potential cost
strength and reduced cost of the crankshaft, without changing saving opportunities are also briefly discussed.
connecting rod and/or engine block. A 26% weight reduction is
also possible considering changes in the main bearings and the
engine block.
Keywords- FEM,ABAQUS, ADAMS, FE
I. INTRODUCTION
Crankshaft is a large component with a complex geometry
in the engine, which converts the reciprocating displacement
of the piston to a rotary motion with a four link mechanism.
Since the crankshaft experiences a large number of load
cycles during its service life, fatigue performance and
durability of this component has to be considered in the
design process. Design developments have always been an
important issue in the crankshaft production industry, in
order to manufacture a less expensive component with the
minimum weight possible and proper fatigue strength and
other functional requirements Side view of the engine block at the time of combustion
(http://www.wikipedia.org/, 2007
Manuscript Received on July 2014.
Sanjeev Kumar, Assessttent Professor Mechanical Subharti Institute of III. DYNAMIC LOAD ANALYSIS OF THE
Technology and Engineering Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, CRANKSHAFT
Meerut, India.
Gaurav Yadav, Mechanical, Subharti Institute of Technology & The crankshaft experiences
Engineering Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, Uttar
a complex loading due to
Pradesh, India.
Published By:
Retrieval Number: B1101053214 /2014©BEIESP
7 Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
Stress Analysis and Optimization of Crankshafts Subject to Dynamic Load
Published By:
Retrieval Number: B1101053214 /2014©BEIESP
8 Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)
ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-3 Issue-3, July 2014
REFERENCES
1. Altan, T., Oh, S., and Gegel, H. L., 1983, “Metal Forming
Fundamentals and Applications,” American Society for Metals,
Metal Park, OH, USA.
2. Ando, S., Yamane, S., Doi, Y., Sakurai, H., and Meguro, H., 1992,
“Method for Forminga Crankshaft,” US Patent No. 5115663, United
States Patent.
3. Baxter, W. J., 1993, “Detection of Fatigue Damage in Crankshafts
with the Gel Electrode,” SAE Technical Paper No. 930409, Society
of Automotive Engineers,Warrendale, PA, USA.
4. Borges, A. C., Oliveira, L. C., and Neto, P. S., 2002, “Stress
Distribution in a Crankshaft Crank Using a Geometrically Restricted
Finite Element Model,” SAE Technical PaperNo. 2002-01-2183,
Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, USA.
5. Burrell, N. K., 1985, “Controlled Shot Peening of Automotive
Components,” SAETechnical Paper No. 850365, Society of
Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, USA.
6. Chien, W. Y., Pan, J., Close, D., and Ho, S., 2005, “Fatigue Analysis
of Crankshaft Sections Under Bending with Consideration of
Residual Stresses,” International Journalof Fatigue, Vol. 27, pp. 1-
19.
7. Fergusen, C. R., 1986, “Internal Combustion Engines, Applied
Thermodynamics,” John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY,
USA.
8. Guagliano, M., Terranova, A., and Vergani, L., 1993, “Theoretical
and Experimental Study of the Stress Concentration Factor in Diesel
Engine Crankshafts,” Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 115, pp.
47-52.
9. Halderman J. D. and Mitchell, C. D., 2001, “Automotive Engines,”
1st edition, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
10. Henry, J., Topolsky, J., and Abramczuk, M., 1992, “Crankshaft
Durability Prediction – A New 3-D Approach,” SAE Technical
Paper No. 920087, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale,
PA, USA.
11. Hoffmann, J. H. and Turonek, R. J., 1992, “High Performance
Forged Steel Crankshafts - Cost Reduction Opportunities,” SAE
Technical Paper No. 920784, Society of Automotive Engineers,
Warrendale, PA, USA.
Published By:
Retrieval Number: B1101053214 /2014©BEIESP
9 Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication