Moorish American Identification Cards - U.S.A. IDENTIFICATION CARDS

Moorish American Identification Cards - U.S.A. IDENTIFICATIO... https://sites.google.com/site/usaidentificationcards/home/moorish-am...
U . S. A . Search this site
I D EN TI F I C A TI ON
CARDS
Home- Home- >
Moorish American Moorish American Identification Cards
Citation Reply
Moorish American
Citation Reply
CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL NOTICE FOR
Moorish American
Citation Reply
STATE OF COLORADO
Moorish American
Identification DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VECHIAL
Cards
Moorish DMV
American
Identification
Cards
YOUR ID CARD RECORDING REQUESTED BY: > > c/o © Nathan-Lee Family Of
OPPT Gray > > near , Denver, CO Near ______ Amexem,
OPPT Press Release U.S.A., Postal Zone ~ [ ] Non-Domestic > > > RIGHT TO
Sitemap TRAVEL > > “All Sovereign, private civilian inhabitants shall have free
access to all judicial courts of the several states. All clerks and / or
deputy shall file all documents of paper for any and / or all-
sovereign, private civilian inhabitants; free and without charge of
fees.” – AMERICA SUPREME COURT CASE - Crandall vs. State of
Nevada, 73 U.S. 35 > > > > According to the “CONSTITUTION OF
THE STATE OF COLORADO, Article I, §2: It states, “Sovereignty of the
people. All political power is vested in and derived from the people;
all government of right originates from the people, is founded upon
their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole.”

1 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE ONLY
AFFIDAVIT: Right to Travel > > According to the “UNITED NATION

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS,” > Article 13. > (1)
Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within
the borders of each state. > (2) Everyone has the right to leave any
country, including his own, and to return to his country. > >
According to the Constitution of the State of Colorado, Article I, §2:
It states, > “Sovereignty of the people. All political power is vested in
and derived from the people; all government of right originates from
the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely
for the good of the whole.” > > Therefore, as a member of the
Sovereignty of the people, I am not only entitled to use the highways
and byways in the so-called United States of America, I have an
inalienable right to use the highways, byways and even waterways
without being under duress. > > "The right to travel is a well-
established common right that does not owe its existence to the
federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right."
Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941. > > >
KNOW ALL MEN AND WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, © Nathan-
Lee Family Of Gray, in Propria persona IN BEING FIRST DULY SWORN
AN OATH, deposes and says: > > > I AM © Nathan-Lee Family Of
Gray, Non-Combatant, Non-Military, Non-Corporate/Commercial;
explicitly distinguished from © NATHAN-LEE FAMILY OF GRAY
(ANY AND ALL DERIVATIVES AND DARIVATIONS), a (fictitious)
artificial - corporate entities Jus Postliminii, ALL RIGHTS RESTORED
AND RESERVED. I Am a natural born (indigenous) sovereign (state),
an original inhabitant of the Americas (Al Morocs / Amexems) and a
Free Moorish Sovereign and member of Moorish National Divine
Movement, in covenant with Allah and Father Abraham and his
Mu’urish Empire through The Holy Prophet Noble Drew Ali and Love,
Truth, Peace, Freedom and Justice. The PROPHET has assigned us
FORM: 1099-No. 10105905. > > According to the United States
Supreme Acts of State to wit: > > “Every Sovereign State (people) is
bound to respect the independence of every other Sovereign State
(people) and the courts of one country (people) will NOT sit in
judgment on the acts of the government of another, done within (the
2 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM
same or) it own territory…” > > According to the “DRAFT

DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES;
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS”; Sub-Commission on Prevention
of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities Forty-fifth session. >
> Article 31. > “Indigenous peoples, as a specific form of exercising
their right to self determination, have the right autonomy or self-
government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs,
including culture, religion, education, information, media, health,
housing, employment, social welfare, economic activities, land and
resource management, environment and entry by non-members, as
well as, ways and means for financing these autonomous functions.”
> > Article 32. > “Indigenous peoples have the collective right to
determine their own Citizenship in accordance with their customs
and traditions. Indigenous Citizenship does NOT impair the RIGHT of
indigenous individuals to obtain Citizenship of the State in which
they live.” > > Therefore, I AM a Moorish National of the Land
Created by Allah now called the Continental united states of America
(Al Moroc - 1787): I AM to domiciled to ALL 48 states, in particularly,
domiciled in the sovereign state of colorado at republic, c/o
, Denver, CO Near Colorado Republic,
Postal Zone ~ [ ] Non Domestic. I AM domiciled in a
foreign jurisdiction to both the corporate State and federal
governments. For I AM NOT a citizen governed under naturalization
or immigration, NOR AM I, a 14th Amendment “person” or “U.S.
citizen” and NOT subject to the statutory, colorable law jurisdiction
of the United States in the corporate monopoly of the federal, State,
local and municipal governments. The City and County Traffic Courts
only have jurisdiction to both the corporate and commercial matters,
and the commercial use of “Motor Vehicles” on public highways and
streets, as defined by Federal law (18 USC 31). The City and County
Traffic Courts are NOT, nor ever have been > authorized to assume
jurisdiction over the general public’s ordinary travel on the public
highways and streets. In fact, City and County Traffic Courts that try
traffic cases are NOT courts of law recognized by either the
Constitution for the united states of America (1791) or ANY State
Constitution. Unless otherwise, stated, I have individual knowledge
of the matters contained within this Affidavit. I am fully competent to
testify with respect to these matters. I have NOT knowingly or
willingly waived ANY of my UNALIENABLE RIGHTS. American case law
has clearly adjudicated that: > > “The use of the highways for the
purpose of TRAVEL and transportation is NOT a mere privilege, but a
common and fundamental RIGHT, of which the public and individuals
can NOT be encroached upon by private individuals or corporations.
Moreover, streets and highways are for the use of the public in
general passage and traffic without distinction, and ALL persons
have an equal RIGHT TO use them for purposes for TRAVEL by
3 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM
proper means, and with due regard for the corresponding RIGHTS of
others.” - 25 Am. Jur. (1st) Highways Sect. 163. pg. 457 > > “The
RIGHT of the Citizen TO TRAVEL upon the public highways and to
transport his/her property thereon either by carriage or automobile,
is NOT a mere privilege, which a city [or State] may prohibit or
permit at will, but a common RIGHT, which he/she has under the
RIGHT to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” - Thompson v.
Smith, 154 SE 579 > > “Even the legislature has NO power to deny to
a Citizen the RIGHT TO TRAVEL upon the highway and transport
his/her property in the ordinary course of his/her business or
pleasure, though this RIGHT may be regulated in accordance with the
public interest and convenience.” [“Regulated,” means traffic safety
enforcement, stop lights, signs etc.] - Chicago Motor Coach v.
Chicago, 169 NE 22 > > > That I have researched extensively the
organic laws of the united states of America, including two hundred
years of American case law (i.e., Common Law), and affirm that I
have secured the UNALIENABLE and FUNDAMENTAL, UNRESTRICTED
and UNREGULATED RIGHT TO TRAVEL upon both the public walkways
and the highways, and transport my personal and allodial property,
duly conveyed, unhindered by ANY private, corporate or statutory
law, or Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) regulation or so-called
requirement. This unalienable RIGHT TO TRAVEL is guaranteed by
the 9th & 10th Amendments of the organic Constitution for the
united states of America and Bill of Rights, and upheld by many
court decisions in support of that right. I, now explicitly RESERVE,
ASSERT and DEFEND that right. > “The RIGHT TO TRAVEL is an
unconditional personal right whose exercise may NOT be
conditioned.” - Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 92 S Ct 995, 31 L
Ed 2d 274. [5 U.S. Dig, Constitutional Law, and 101.5, Right of
interstate of international travel.] > > > This AFFIDAVIT is submitted
upon demand of a driver’s license, registration or proof of insurance
as part of the official record of ANY ensuing action and must be
introduced as evidence in said action. > “NO State entity has the
power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, NOR
waterways…transporting his vehicles and personal property for
either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local
regulation, i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc.
TRAVEL IS NOT A PRIVILEGE REQUIRING LICENSING, VEHICLE
REGISTRATION, OR FORCED INSURANCE.” - Chicago Coach Co. v. City
of Chicago, 337 III. 200, 169 N. E. 22. > > “The court makes it clear
that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession,
business, trade, or calling; thus, when merely traveling without
compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or adventure
with the corporate state. NO LICENSE IS REQUIRED OF THE NATURAL
INDIVIDUAL TRAVELING FOR PERSONAL BUSINESS, PLEASURE AND
TRANSPORTATION.” - Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d 213 [1972] > >
4 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM
> that I, © Nathan-Lee Family Of Gray do NOT under ANY

circumstances; utilize the public highways for commercial purposes.
Once again, I am NOT a 14th Amendment legal “person” engaged in
interstate commerce, NOR do I derive income from driving and/or
transporting of goods. I am NOT a “driver,” NOR am I an “operator”
of a “motor vehicle.” I AM a navigator, "a traveler” and a “traveler”
places NO charge upon other(s) traveling with him or her. A Moorish
American Citizens own private automobiles or "land port vehicle,"
such as, cars, jeeps, trucks and etc… In fact, once the automobile
becomes private property, it too becomes protected under the 5th
Amendment to the Constitution for the united states of America… >
“No person (individual) shall…be deprived of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for
public use, without just compensation.” - Article v. Amendment > >
“The RIGHTS of the Citizen TO TRAVEL upon the public highways and
to transport his/her property there on by carriage or automobile, is
NOT a mere privilege, which a city (or state) may prohibit or permit
at will, but a Common Right, which he/she has under the RIGHT TO
LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.” - Thompson v.
Smith 154SE579 > > > Thus, there is a difference between a traveler
and a driver. The driver’s license is for motor vehicles involved in
commerce only, such as, Taxi Cabs, UPS Trucks, Motor Coach
(Buses), Airplanes and 18-wheel Tractor-Trailer Trucks. “Motor
Vehicle” therefore, can be defined as, every description of carriage or
other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and
passengers and property, or property and cargo; “used for
commercial purposes” means the carriage of person or property for
any fare, fee, rate, charges, or other consideration, or directly or
indirectly, in connection with any business, other undertaking for
profit.” My private, self-propelled contrivance/carriage is NOT
involved in commerce; therefore, it is NOT a “motor vehicle.” The
corporate State of Colorado Department of Motor Vehicle code does
NOT disclose the true intent and purpose of the statutes, though a
motor vehicle” is adequately and clearly defined in the United States
Code (USC). > “Motor Vehicle means every description of carriage
other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used
for commercial purposes.” – “18 USC 31” > > Thus, ONLY
corporations can make FRN's (fiat notes) from the use of the motor
vehicles. > > “Thus, ONLY corporations can make money from the
use of motor vehicles. The privilege of using the streets and
highways by the operation thereon of motor carriers for hire can be
acquired only by permission or license from the state or its political
subdivision.” – Title 18, United States Code, Section 31. > > 5.
Therefore, I can NOT in good faith apply for and accept a driver’s
license, as I would be committing PERJURY. I AFFIRM that I am a
member of, citizen of, franchise of, or resident (agent) of [judiciary,
5 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM
surety for] the corporate “State of Colorado,” when the already

established facts by affidavit have evidenced that I am NOT a
member of, citizen of, franchise of, or resident (agent) of the
corporate “State of Ohio” or the federal United States (incorporated).
> > 6. Therefore, I have determined and hereby affirm by AFFIDAVIT
and under affirmation, by virtue of my declared sovereign state
Citizenship and American case law, that I am NOT required to have
government permission to travel; NOT required to have a driver’s
license from the non-profit private corporation DMV; NOT required
to have vehicle registration of my personal property, NOR to
surrender the lawful title of my duly conveyed property to the State
as security against government indebtedness and the undeclared
federal bankruptcy. ANY administrative rule, regulation or statutory
act of ANY State legislature or judicial tribunal to the contrary is
unlawful and clearly unconstitutional, thus NULL and VOID. American
case law has clearly adjudicated that: > > “ALL laws, which are
repugnant to the Constitution, are NULL and VOID.” > - Marbury v.
Madison, 5 U.S. 137 > > “Statutes that violate the plain and obvious
principles of common right and common reason are NULL and VOID.”
> - Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60 > > “Where RIGHTS secured by the
Constitution are involved, there can be NO rule making or
legislation, which would abrogate them.” > - Miranda v. Arizona,
384 U.S. > > “The state can NOT diminish RIGHTS of the people” > –
Hertado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 > > “There can be NO sanction
or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of
constitutional RIGHTS. - Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945 > > “The claim
and exercise of a constitutional RIGHT can NOT be converted into a
CRIME.” – Miller v. U. S., 230 F 2d 486, 489 > > 7. Thus, ANY action
involving a citation or ticket issued confiscation, impoundment or
search and seizure of my private property by a police officer or ANY
other public servant or employee, which carries a fine or jail time, is
a penalty or sanction, thus converting a RIGHT into a crime. ANY
citation or ticket is thus, NULL and VOID. Under every circumstance
without exception, government officials must hold the Constitution
for the united states of America (1791) supreme over ANY other
laws, regulations or orders. Every police (executive) officer or judicial
officer has SWORN AN OATH, an oath to protect the lives, property
and RIGHTS of the citizens of the united states of America under the
supreme law of the land. ANY act to deprive state Citizens of their
constitutionally protected RIGHTS is a direct violation of their oath of
office, a felony and a federal crime. > > “A State (or the U.S.) may
NOT impose a CHARGE for the enjoyment of a RIGHT granted by the
Federal Constitution.” - Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 > >
“REGULATIONS, FEES, TAXES, MAY NOT BE APPLIED TO NATURAL
PERSON USING COMMON HIGHWAYS, as it is in derogation of
common right of public to use highways as an avenue upon, which
6 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM
vehicles for transportation of goods, passengers, freight and traffic

of all kinds may be freely moved, having due regard for rights of
others, while this, or other provisions of statute, should be fairly,
liberally construed to promote the effect and the evident purpose for
which it was intended, care should be exercised not to unduly
extend it’s effect.” > - Young v. Madison County, 115 N. > > 8. ANY
action by a police (executive) officer, officer of the court, public
servant or government official to assert unlawful authority under the
“color of law” will be construed as a direct and willful violation of my
constitutionally protected RIGHTS (1787), and will be prosecuted to
the full extent of American law. > > "The police power of the state
must be exercised in subordination to the provisions of the U.S.
Constitution." Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co. vs. State Highway
Commission, 294 US 613; Bacahanan vs. Wanley, 245 US 60. > > "It
is well settled that the Constitutional Rights protected from invasion
by the police power, include Rights safeguarded both by express and
implied prohibitions in the Constitutions." Tiche vs. Osborne, 131 A.
60. > > "As a rule, fundamental limitations of regulations under the
police power are found in the spirit of the Constitutions, not in the
letter, although they are just as efficient as if expressed in the
clearest language." Mehlos vs. Milwaukee, 146 NW 882. > > “Public
officials are NOT immune from suit when they transcend their lawful
authority by invading constitutional RIGHTS.” - AFLCIO v. Woodward,
406 F2d 137 t. > > “Whoever under the color of any law, statute,
ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of
any state, Territory, or District to the deprivation of ANY rights,
privileges or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution of
laws of the United States…shall be fined not more than $1,000 or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both…” – 18 USC 242 > >
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be
made in Pursuance thereof...shall be the supreme Law of the Land;
and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in
the Constitution or laws of any State to the Contrary not one word
withstanding... The Senators and Representatives before mentioned,
and the Members of the several State legislatures, and all executive
and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several
states, shall be bound by OATH or AFFIRMATION, to support this
Constitution;” – Constitution for the united states of America, Article
6 > > 9. This AFFIDAVIT also certifies that I have previously
completed and passed a test measuring my competency to safely
control an automobile vehicle upon the public highways within the
united states of America. I have also met or exceeded all common
sense requirements concerning the “rules of the road” and the ability
to maneuver an automobile vehicle in a safe and responsible
manner. > > PERJURY JURAT > > Pursuant to Title 28, USC 1746 (1)
and executed “without the united states of American,” I, © Nathan-
7 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM
Lee Family Of Gray, affirm under penalty of perjury under the laws
of the united states of America that the foregoing is true and correct,
to the best of my informed knowledge. And further deponent saith
not. I now affix my autograph and official seal to all of the above
affirmations > > Respectfully, > > > L.S. Citizen/Principal, by
Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, preceding Sui Juris, with
Assistance, Special > > > National Seal: > > > Sworn, subscribed,
sealed and affirmed before me this day of 2011. >
> Notary Public for Colorado Republic >
_____________________________ > > my commission expires
,
_________________WITNESSES:
________________WITNESSES:
Moorish Science Temple of America, Inc.
Moorish Divine National Movement of North America
Canon-Affidavit: Right Travel/Affidavit Right to Travel
CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL NOTICE:
Canon-Affidavit: Right Travel/Right To Travel > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL NOTICE: DMV > > > (Date
07/22/11) Certified Mail: _____________ > c/o
__________________________ Ex. Corp. © NATHAN-LEE FAMILY OF
GRAY near , Denver, CO Near ,
COLORADO REPUBLIC, via. u.s.A. Postal-Zone ~ [ ] > NON-
DOMESTIC > > -----CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL NOTICE----- > >
Department of Motor Vehicles > _____________________
______________________,Co________ > TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: >
> This is constructive LEGAL NOTICE to all elected, appointed or
employed officials, including police officers, agents, or
representatives of the city, county, state and/or federal government,
including corporations and attorneys. > > That I, © NATHAN-LEE
FAMILY OF GRAY have secured the UNALIENABLE and
FUNDAMENTAL, UNRESTRICTED and UNREGULATED RIGHT TO
TRAVEL upon public walkways and highways, and transport my
personal and allodial property LAND PORT VESSEL(S) VIN #
], duly conveyed, unhindered by ANY
8 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM
private, corporate or statutory law, or Department of Motor Vehicles

(DMV) regulation or requirement (See enclosed Affidavit: Right To
Travel). > > That I, © Nathan-Lee Family Of Gray, have revoked the
Power of Attorney unknowingly and unintentionally granted to the
Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). That you can NO longer act on
my behalf or take ANY action without my consent, without TRESPASS
upon my person or property. > > That ANY action involving a
citation or ticket, extortion, confiscation, impoundment or illegal
adhesion contracts search and seizure of my private property by a
police officers or ANY other public servant or employee will be
considered a willful act to deprive me of my constitutionally
protected RIGHTS, as an American, sovereign state Citizen. > > That
action by a police officer, officer of the court, public servant or
government official to assert unlawful authority under the “color of
law” will be construed as a direct and willful violation of my
constitutionally protected RIGHTS and prosecuted to the full extent
of American law. (Title 18, USC 241 and 242) > > Respectfully, > >
> L.S.
Citizen/Principal, Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, preceding

Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special > > CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL
NOTICE: Sheriff Officers / Polices > > Certified Mail:
__________________________ > > Date: _______________________ >
Appellation [Name]: _________________________________ > Location:
_______________________________________________ >
________________________ u.s.A. Zip Exempt, [NON-DOMESTIC] > >
-CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL NOTICE- > TO ALL SHERIFF OFFICERS /
POLICES > > TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: > This is actual and
constructive LEGAL NOTICE to all elected, appointed or employed
officials including police officers, agents, or representatives of the
City, County, State, States, Nations and/or federal government,
including corporations and attorneys. That a police officer is an
employee of a private corporation (Municipal, county, or state), and
such has no personal immunity from acts committed upon this
CITIZEN. > > This constructive LEGAL NOTICE submitted upon
demand for a driver’s license, vehicle registration, or proof of
insurance as part of the official record of ANY ensuing action and
must be introduced as evidence in said action. You will be held
responsible for all actions done knowingly and willingly towards this
CITIZEN. You will be held responsible in both your individual and
official capacity. I strongly advise you to proceed with caution and
full knowledge of the consequences of your actions upon this
CITIZEN. > > ANY action involving a citation or ticket issued,
confiscation, or impoundment or illegal search and seizure of my
private property by a police officer, or ANY other public servant or
9 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM
employee which carries a fine, jail time, or the posting of exorbitant

bail, will be considered a penalty or sanction against this sovereign
state CITIZEN. Thus you best have PROBABLE CAUSE that I have IN
FACT, not in theory, committed a CRIME to justify such actions, and
be willing to sign such INFORMATION under oath. > > I explicitly
RESERVE, ASSERT, and DEFEND my RIGHT TO TRAVEL. I have
exercised this RIGHT by expatriating from the U.S. citizenship of the
federal, United States and all its political subdivisions, including
Municipal, County, and State corporations. I, © Nathan-Lee Family
Of Gray, have reclaimed my lawful, sovereign state Citizenship of
the Colorado Republic (1787). As such, I am a lawful CITIZEN, and
you are my public servant having taken an oath to uphold the law of
the land, the state, and federal constitutions. > > > > Take JUDICIAL
NOTICE of the procedures concerning diversity of citizenship, the
jurisdiction of subject mater, and persons required to appear.
Corporate, administrative courts and tribunals have no original
jurisdiction over sovereign state CITIZENS whatsoever. ANY citation
or ticket is thus NULL and VOID and shall be REFUSED FOR CAUSE,
WITHOUT DISHONOR. > > Under every circumstance without
exception, government officials must hold the Colorado
Constitution (1876) and the Constitution for the united states of
America (1791) supreme over ANY other laws, regulations or orders.
Every police or executive officer or judicial officer has sworn an oath
to protect the lives, property and rights of the sovereign state
Citizens of the united states of America under the supreme law of
the land. ANY act to deprive sovereign state Citizens of their
constitutionally protected rights is a direct violation of their oath of
office, a felony, and a federal crime. I have given actual and
constructive LEGAL NOTICE to the Department of Motor Vehicles
(DMV), and the Municipal, district, and county courts, of my RIGHT
TO TRAVEL. I have also revoked their Power of Attorney. The court
and its executive officers CANNOT lawfully act on my behalf, or take
ANY action against me without my consent, without TRESSPASS upon
my person or > property. > > This is the only constructive LEGAL
NOTICE to be given. All other actions will be considered willful. The
United States supreme Court has repeatedly asserted: > > “The
officers of the law, in execution of process, are obliged to know the
requirements of the law, and if they mistake them, whether through
ignorance or design, and anyone is harmed by their error, they must
respond in damages.” -Rogers v. Marshall (United States use of
Rogers v. Conklin), 1 Wall. (US) 644, 17 L ed 714 > > “It is a general
rule that an officer, executive, administrative, quasi-judicial,
ministerial, or otherwise, who acts outside the scope of his
jurisdiction, and without authorization of law may thereby render
himself amenable to personal liability in a civil suit.” –Cooper v.
O’Conner, 69 App DC 100, 99 F (2d) > > Any action by a police
10 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM
officer, officer of the court, public servant or government official to

assert unlawful authority under the “color of law” will be construed
as a direct and willful violation of my constitutionally protected
rights and prosecuted to the full extent of American law. (Title 18
USC 241, 242; Title 42 1983, 1985 and other applicable laws of the
united stated of America) > > “Public officials are not immune from
suit when they transcend their lawful authority by invading
constitutional rights.” –AFLCIO v. Woodward, 406 F2d 137. > >
“Whoever under the color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation,
or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any state, Territory, or
District to the deprivation of ANY rights, privileges or immunities
secured or protected by the Constitution of laws of the United
States…shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more
than one year, or both…” -18 USC 242 > > I have NOW exercised
the RESERVATION OF RIGHTS provided in the Uniform Commercial
Code (UCC) with IDENTIFICATION, whereby I may reserve my
Common Law right NOT to be compelled to perform under any
contract adhesion contract or agreement that I have not entered into
knowingly, voluntarily or intentionally. And that reservation serves as
LEGAL NOTICE upon all administrative agencies of government,
federal, State, and local, that I do NOT, and will NOT accept the
liability associated with the compelled benefit of any unrevealed
commercial agreement. > > Respectfully, > > > > > L.S. Citizen/
Principal, by Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, proceeding Sui
Juris, with Assistance, Special > > > > > > > > > SHERIFF
OFFICER(S) / POLICE PERSON(S) > > I,
, have read the above constructive
LEGAL NOTICE, and am aware of its contents. NOTICE has been
properly and duly served. > > Signature of Sheriff Officer / Polices:
________________________________________________________________________
> > Badge #: _____________ > > > > > [DATE] Certified Mail:
________________ > > STATE OF COLORADO File No: ________ >
Plaintiff, > > VS. > >
_____________________________, Pro Per., “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” >
Dissenting Accused > > --NOTICE OF DEFAULT— > > “The claim
and exercise of a constitutional RIGHT can NOT be converted into a
CRIME.” – Miller vs. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489 > >
This is NOTICE that you are in DEFAULT to my AFFIDAVIT: RIGHT TO

TRAVEL, sent by Certified Mail from the (USPS) United States Postal
Service – and according to the their website; > www.usps.com
(http://trkcnfrm: ) Label/Receipt
Number:#
.
11 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM
Status: Delivered at on in COLORADO

CITY, COLORADO ZIP _________. > > > > Also, in the said Court,
written AFFIDAVIT: RIGHT TRAVEL/RIGHT TO TRAVEL - WANT OF
JURISDICTION on the part of the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF
COLORADO, INCORPORATED (Judge, Clerk of Court, District Attorney
etc…), which is an instrument of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
INCORPORATED required a returnable answer, rebuttal and defiance
point by point – categorically sworn true, correct, certain, complete,
the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth in the same
manner as said Affidavits were served. However, since the Affidavit
was never answered then the said Court concurred with my
declarations and testimony in this matter. Your failure to respond or
rebut by a returnable answer is taken as Silence. Thereby dismissing
ALL proposed orders or judgments against me WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
> “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is legal or
moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be
intentionally misleading.” - U.S. vs. Tweel (1977) 550 F 2d 297. > >
“Where there is clearly NO jurisdiction over the subject matter, any
authority exercised is usurped authority, and for the exercise of such
authority, when the want of jurisdiction is known to the judge, NO
excuse is permissible.” - Bradley vs. Fisher, 13 Wall 335, 352. > >
Jurisdiction was NEVER proven! And because, it has NEVER been
proven: “No sanction can be imposed absent proof of jurisdiction.” -
Standard vs. Olsen, 74 S. Ct. 768 > > “Where RIGHTS secured by the
Constitution are involved, there can be NO rule making or
legislation, which would abrogate them.” - Miranda v. Arizona, 384
U.S. > > “NO State entity has the power to allow or deny passage on
the highways, byways, NOR waterways…transporting his vehicles and
personal property for either recreation or business, but by being
subject only to local regulation, i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights,
speed limits, etc. TRAVEL IS NOT A PRIVILEGE REQUIRING LICENSING,
VEHICLE REGISTRATION, OR FORCED INSURANCE.” - Chicago Coach
Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 III. 200, 169 N. E. 22. > > “The court
makes it clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in
profession, business, trade, or calling; thus, when merely traveling
without compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or
adventure with the corporate state. NO LICENSE IS REQUIRED OF THE
NATURAL INDIVIDUAL TRAVELING FOR PERSONAL BUSINESS,
PLEASURE AND TRANSPORTATION.” - Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d
213 [1972] > > “REGULATIONS, FEES, TAXES, MAY NOT BE APPLIED
TO NATURAL PERSON USING COMMON HIGHWAYS…” - Young v.
Madison County, 115 N. > > On again, “A State (or the U.S.) may
NOT impose a CHARGE for the enjoyment of a RIGHT granted by the
Federal Constitution.” - Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 > >
“The claim and exercise of a constitutional RIGHT can NOT be
12 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM
converted into a CRIME.” – Miller vs. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489 > > I
hereby affix my autograph and official seal to all of the above
affirmations with EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL OF MY UNALIENABLE
RIGHTS, WITHOUT PREJUDICE to any of those rights pursuant to
U.C.C. 3-308, *U.C.C. 1-207 and U.C.C. 1-103.6. This includes, but
is not limited to, the right to travel upon the public highways and
transport my private property unhindered by corporate State
regulations and statues that do not apply to sovereign, state Citizens
and /or freepersons. > > Cordially, > > c/o © Nathan-Lee Family
Of Gray near_________________, DENVER, CO Near ______, COLORADO
Republic, via u.s.A > Postal Zone [ ] Non Domestic > > > >
Sworn, subscribed, sealed and affirmed before me this _______day of
___________20__. > > Notary Public for Colorado Republic >
_____________ > > my commission expires ________________ >
AND/OR > ________________ > WITNESSES:

WITNESSES.
Comments
You do not have permission to add comments.
Sign in | Recent Site Activity | Report Abuse | Print Page | Powered By Google Sites
13 of 13 2/23/22, 7:08 PM

Moorish American Identification Cards - U.S.A. IDENTIFICATION CARDS

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Moorish American Identification Cards - U.S.A. IDENTIFICATION CARDS

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Moorish American Identification Cards - U.S.A. IDENTIFICATIO... https://sites.google.com/site/usaidentificationcards/home/moorish-am...

U . S. A . Search this site

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE ONLY

AFFIDAVIT: Right to Travel > > According to the “UNITED NATION

same or) it own territory…” > > According to the “DRAFT

> that I, © Nathan-Lee Family Of Gray do NOT under ANY

surety for] the corporate “State of Colorado,” when the already

vehicles for transportation of goods, passengers, freight and traffic

Moorish Science Temple of America, Inc.

Moorish Divine National Movement of North America

Canon-Affidavit: Right Travel/Affidavit Right to Travel

CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL NOTICE:

private, corporate or statutory law, or Department of Motor Vehicles

Citizen/Principal, Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, preceding

employee which carries a fine, jail time, or the posting of exorbitant

officer, officer of the court, public servant or government official to

This is NOTICE that you are in DEFAULT to my AFFIDAVIT: RIGHT TO

Status: Delivered at on in COLORADO

AND/OR > ________________ > WITNESSES:

You do not have permission to add comments.

You might also like