Pharmacy Residency Presentation Evaluation Form Presentation Title: \ \ Speaker:__Kyte Date:_jANS Scoring Rubric - 1: Not Accomplished 2: Needs Development 3: Acceptable 4: Mostly Accomplished 5: Accomplished Speaker Evaluation z Scoring _- | Comments “The speaker maintained appropriate eye contact 123 OS | ed pe Fae Re throughout the presentation, ‘The presenter spoke ina strong volte atan appropriate [12 3 (@) 5 | GAC naw qu in Ae Gack, pace throughout the presentation Zz SpoMle weed ‘The slides were visually appealing, easy to read, and G2 3 4 § |i tle Aten Lea per containgdbisspeiingenons & fn i nt pe ne” Fed The speaker was clearly knowledgeable on the topie T2345 presented. 2 ‘The speaker actively engaged the audience in this Os 4s Pee EE Tone | Leong ety, ee = - Dijechues duel the tye et hand we speaker adequately answered questions a r2345 ptomsed carReslon when seers ye nuaedy Cerporsee? The presentation was unbiased and provided a fal TO 4 5 [itaae we moon war oe balance of information. ints Gwen ter oe ee rv Quality of Presentation ESET, FW VE Be gh, The program was organized and presented inalogical 12 @)4 5 a ea fashion. ast ‘The knowledge gained at this program willbe applicable {1 © 3 4-5 ae a we to my daily practice. - hte i poaetion tpplitabte to mocke ‘The program met my expectations based on the learning |1 2 @ 4 5 objectives. bs ‘Overall, gained new information and knowledge onthe |1(@)3 4 5 subject presented. The program subject and degree of detail were _ O23 45 |Win an bel wl appropriate for the audience. dy oe sgn pu paasbed? ‘The program subject and degree of detail were 1@345 appropriate for the time allotted. (approx. 30-4Smin) Comments: (Strengths/Weaknesses/Areas for Improvement?) Qt t, Wier in DandionwPharmacy Residency Presentation Evaluation Form Presentation Title spree Date: Scoring Rubric 1: Not Accomplished 2: Needs Development 3:Acceptable 4; Mostly Accomplished 5: Accomplished ‘Speaker Evaluation = Scoring _~ __| Comments The speaker maintained appropriate eye contact 123s throughout the presentation. The presenter spoke in a strong voice atan appropriate |i 2 3@)S | ppace throughout the presentation Z The slides were visually appealing, easy to read, and V3 45 ; contained no spelling errors, 0 [Sore inconsicen Grr rnetrin “The speaker was clearly knowledgeable on the topie T2@rs | presented. , The speaker actively engaged the audience in this, T2@as learning activity. 9 Cie pa quertwy winiedifiaurr The speaker adequately answered questions and T2@45 ~ Sena oP ope | provided clarification when necessary. The presentation was unbiased and prowded ae | 2-3 @)S balance of information. Quality of Presentation The program was organized and presented ina logical Ji 2 3(9 5 fashion. The knowledge gained at this program willbe appleable [1 7 3 PS to my daily practice. The program met my expectations based on the learning |i 2 3(W 5 objectives. A ‘Overall, gained new information and knowledge onthe |i 2 (3) 4 5 subject presented. The program subject and degree of detail were _ T2@45 _ appropriate for the audience. \akwcye Gewo a Aol coctre The program subject and degree of detail were 727@@s5 appropriate for the time allotted. (approx. 30-45min) I Comments: | {Strengths/Weaknesses/Areas for Improvement?) —Quiditner Quunhun : Stemane qwutin- tro wr yey coufcSing the quirtinn seemeol =p cout youhune Unsice Ww tydo velated Wf predaataun Crank hee WU of, wy hi po wudintrus + uanapuurt Cput pence fost dado ve chances of TIM, wt eer past ks Your quien cePharmacy Residency Presentation Evaluation Form, Presentation Title: “Lary lted Cong Neseagene Speaker: le iv haw Wis Date: Scoring Rubric - 1: Not Accomplished 2: Needs Development 3: Acceptable 4: Mostly Accomplished 5: Accomplished ‘Speaker Evaluation z ‘Scoring Comments ‘The speaker maintained appropriate eye contact throughout the presentation. 1 23 ao appropriate for the time allotted. (approx. 30-45min) The presenter spoke ina strong ole atan appropiate (7 2 3@)5 |g naybouiaté DAH | pace throughout the presentation Z oda bat ten coated sm ‘The slides were visually appealing, easy to read, and 12346) © contained no spelling errors. ‘The speaker was clearly knowledgeable on the topic 12346 presented. ‘The speaker actively engaged the audience in this 12305 earning activity. The speaker adequately answered questions and 123@5 provided clarification when necessary. ‘The presentation was unbiased and provided a fair 12346 balance of information. Quality of Presentation The program was organized and presented in alogical [i 2 3 4 @ fashion. The knowledge gained at this program willbeapplicable | 1 23 4 @ ‘to my dally practice. . The program met my expectations based on the learning |1 2 3 4 (3) objectives. 5 Overall, gained new information and knowledge onthe 12 3 ) 5 subject presented. The program subject and degree of detail were 12340 ‘ appropriate for the audience, The program subject and degree of detail were 12 O45 Totsk Pre tnkebage Copied Comments: (Strengths/Weaknesses/Areas for improvement?) Gork Pros Lu Wl Usesiens, Phe froth estPharmacy Residency Presentation Evaluation Form t Presentation tle: _“[érylted Teng Mu Speakers Kula 3 Hise ; — Date:__12/ 1¢]z4 Scoring Rubric - 1: Not Accomplished 2: Needs Development 3: Acceptable 4: Mostly Accomplished 5: Accomplished Speaker Evaluation z Scoring ‘Comments ‘The speaker maintained appropriate eye contact 1234@ throughout the présentation, The presenter spoke ina strong voice atan appropriate 12 3@)8 | Coe nzpbousass® @ hak - pace throughout the presentation A jes were visually appealing, easy to read, and i1234@ contained no spelling errors. The speaker was clearly knowledgeable on the topic 12346 presented. ‘The speaker actively engaged the audience in this 123@5 learning activity. The speaker adequately answered questions and T23@s provided clarification when necessary. The presentation was unbiased and provided a fair 12346 balance of information, Quality of Presentation ‘The program was organized and presented in alogical [i 2 3 4 @ fashion. ‘The knowledge gained at this program willbe applicable [12 3 4 to my daily practice, ss The program met my expectations based onthe learning |1 2 3 4 © objectives. : Overall, {gained new information and knowledge onthe [12 3 @)5 subject presented. The program subject and degree of detail were _ 12340 . appropriate for the audience. The program subject and degree of detail were 12O4s appropriate for the time allotted. {approx. 30-4Smin) Tolat Pre tntetin Co Lede - . ctnegtonr eine Comments: (Strengths/Weaknesses/Areas for Improvement?) Corl Frys well f. Pho eTPharmacy Residency Presentation Evaluation Form Presentation Title: ise ed) ee Manssenend Speaker: Qe darlene Date:__\a\ys\>" Scoring Rubrie 1: Not Accomplished 2: Needs Development 3: Acceptable 4: Mostly Accomplished 5: Accomplished Speaker Evalvation z Scoring =, | Comments ‘The speaker maintained appropriate eye contact 123@s5 throughout the presentation, The presenter spoke in a strong volse atan appropriate [i 2 3(@)5 | pace throughout the presentation Z ‘The slides were visually appealing, easy to read, and LGB 4S [AAT motes contained no spelling errors. Lenerto, ese per, Sones Ak Saud “The speaker was clearly knowledgeable on the topic TO GS S [Orem kanal the MATIN presente presented. - Derseged mn Net of pueoksh i The speaker actively engaged the audience in this L2@ 4S [we msde arnedebia 2 23 pve} learning activity. Anal | Aufupe Siese panes gam leg [ants The speaker adequately answered questions and 1@345 provided clarification when necessary. ‘The presentation was unbiased and provided a fair 1 2O BS [Re re Canes TS balance of information, options onder seen ‘Quality of Presentation ‘The program was organized and presented in a logical 123@5 fashion. ‘The knowledge gained at this program will be applicable [1 2G) 4 5 to my daily practice. The program met my expectations based on the learning |1 2 3G) 5 objectives. 5 (Overall, gained new information and knowledge onthe |1 2G) 5 subject presented. The program subject and degree of detail were _ 1 2GI4ES [Are nb ok precjuan oF phen noiwa} appropriate for the audience, aoe of OH meelonnin prtaneter The program subject and degree of detail were 123@5 appropriate for the time allotted. (approx. 30-45min) Comments: fear @ (Strengths/Weaknesses/Areas for Improvement?) ee Ae EIR At >, Mod Ye Wee eve gesboore 4 VG, Rad give : pedbeny paren ore ppd Yo cas Be gaan (Ses int fee Js eee pent Yo wld ste Tah ape Mata ane). Ales, cotepetate mere pent (pally Yi dread eo be ae Ce esi You Ved Aneto gs pail Cae DL swde en, : : “> bud peemaacedos Camplat, tmpmcads, etd, “ = . “> opsmchi Bulec sens ert act Senesal oe Bert pretehien. bot tts. pe y bone Gens Deemte whey Lin dete penpetery eres bore es watea!. oa eny Ute marlon, Gab re MCW yan, Pee ett tbe doamneer patoben alla teaty Lede Yen om de OE ecNalge, siemnPharmacy Residency Presentation Evaluation Form Presentation Title: Tavgeredl Tempevatwe Manageme ot Speaker: Kyte Stweeus Date: (2-19-21 Scoring Rubric 1: Not Accomplished 2: Needs Development 3: Acceptable 4: Mostly Accomplished 5: Accomplished ‘Speaker Evaluation a ‘Scoring ‘Comments The speaker maintained appropriate eye contact 12346 throughout the presentation, The presenter spoke ina strong Vole atan appropriate [i 23 @ 5 pace throughout the presentation. The slides were visually appealing, easy to read, and 12 3@5 contained no spelling errors. “The speaker was clearly knowledgeable on the topic 1234©® presented. ‘The speaker actively engeged the audience in this T23Hs Jearning activity. The speaker adequately answered questions and T2345 provided clarification when necessary. ‘The presentation was unbiased and provided a fair 12348 balance of information. Quality of Presentation ‘The program was organized and presented inalogical [123 4@ | fashion. The knowledge gained at this program will be applicable [1 2 3 4 (3) to my daily practice. The program met my expectations based onthe leaming [12 3 4 5 objectives. “ Overall, I gained new information and knowledge onthe |i 2 3 4 © subject presented. The program subject and degree of detail were _ TIIOSs appropriate for the audience. The program subject and degree of detail were 12346) appropriate for the time allotted. (approx. 30-45min) * Comments: {Strengths/Weaknesses/Areas for Improvement?)Pharmacy Residency Presentation Evaluation Form Presentation Title + Speaker: Date: ys/aorp Scoring Rubric 1: Not Accomplished 2: Needs Development 3: Acceptable 4; Mostly Accomplished 5: Accomplished ( Speaker Evaluation Scoring Comments | The speaker maintained appropriate eve ‘contact throughout the presentation, 2526) ‘The presenter spoke in a strong vole at an appropriate pace throughout the presentation TIO objectives. ‘The slides were visually appealing, easy to read, and 12 O45 ley te ceed, bar lnetak Creat wy contained no spelling errors. Aodhan grObes ‘The speaker was clearly knowledgeable on the topic 123@ presented. The speaker actively engaged the audience in this 123@5 learning activity Hee ‘The speaker adequately answered questions and 12@45/ provided clarification when necessary. The presentation was unbiased and provided a fair 123@5 balance of information, Quality of Presentation. cree eee ‘The program was organized and presented in a logical 12305 sas fashion, ‘The knowledge gained at this program will be applicable |i 2 @)4 5 |Orky bataon Webo net ML, to my daily practice. | ego Wy Sine L do aotopigheTCn The program met my expectations based on the earning [12-3 @s Overall, | gained new information and knowledge on the subject presented. The program subject and degree of detail were appropriate for the audience. The program subject and degree of detail were appropriate for the time allotted. (approx. 30-45min) Comments: (Strengths/Weaknesses/Areas for Improvement?) Lo due gyitdine ari uk yow Bid yaaPharmacy Residency Presentation Evaluation Form Presentation Title: CIsdeideihth dfidle Date: Scoring Rubric Speaker: Yaoyle stir Vaud 1: Not Accomplished 2: Needs Development 3: Acceptable 4: Mostly Accomplished 5: Accomplished ‘Speaker Evaluation Comments “The speaker maintained appropriate eye contact throughout the presentation. The presenter spoke in a strong vole at an appropriate pace throughout the presentation contained no spelling errors. ‘The slides were visually appealing, easy to read, and ue Wowk Watioke mane VRE oni tak of + words on aQidt The speaker was clearly knowledgeable on the topic, 1 presented. c ‘The speaker actively engaged the audience in this 1 learning activity. Awhienee ques tes ee hove daale The speaker adequately answered questions and 7 provided clarification when necessary. ‘The presentation was unbiased and provided a fair 1 balance of information, side + rateoeeren BY rs de thola- Dose Jot wong ra eS Quality of Presentation FIBA xferrca, ‘The program was organized and presented in alogical | 1 fashion. ‘The knowledge gained at this program will be applicable | 1 to my daily practice. The program met my expectations based on the learning | 7 objectives. (Overall, | gained new information and knowledge on the | 2 subject presented. The program subject and degree of detail were _ T appropriate for the audience. The program subject and degree of detail were 7 appropriate for the time allotted. (approx. 30-45min) Comments: {Strengths/Weaknesses/Areas for Improvement?)Pharmacy Residency Presentation Evaluation Form Presentation Title:__< Od6F “Tramdmend Updeder Speaker:___béy\e Gbarlews Date:___4|:\a2- Scoring Rubrie 1: Not Accomplished 2: Needs Development 3: Acceptable 4: Mostly Accomplished 5: Accomplished Speaker Evaluation z Scoring | Comments The speaker maintained appropriate eye contact 12 3@5 |Powd aden a Ph ee Rakes throughout the presentation. Neniey woltle f preseaetinn The presenter spoke in a strong voise at an appropriate |i 2 3 4 ~ pace throughout the presentation ‘The slides were visually appealing, easytoread,and "|i 2 G)4 5 |Atwwa, seins Gyile 8,4) © | contained no spelling errors. Jets Speen te ONE BB vay The speaker was clearly knowledgeable on the topic T23@5 presented. @ The speaker actively engaged the audience in this TOS 4 5 [Rowe pets Ge Te ee | megaety jonety pone Moses, Scatahew The speaker adequately answered questions and 12045 provided clarification when necessary. ‘The presentation was unbiased and provided a fair 1234 balance of information. Quality of Presentation The program was organized and presented in alogical ]1 23 @ 5 fashion. ‘The knowledge gained at this program will beapplicable [i 2 3 @ 5 to my daily practice. The program met my expectations based on the learning |1 2 @ 4 5 objectives. >, Overall, | gained new information and knowledge onthe [1 2 3 @ 5 subject presented. | The Program subject and degree of detail were 11s FR Pe ee ee e debines os ayeet) Gey tt ae appropriate for the audience. [> De aes ‘The program subject and degree of detail were 123 46) appropriate for the time allotted, (approx. 30-45min) Comments: (Strengths/Weaknesses/Areas for Improvement?) © CP bee cenmentry dents tur prerendnbire seraiel marth fron an evgenitel puspectae. Joep Hae, reer > Wi que, we Wee Wed te meant puntos 19 eagane a chan feo mae acta wth Wie pretelins pur Umoata alot One grertiin per dvedive S6 weve appre te Nowe, Que GCeadh Geb dhdben gh ate yA epee Ri CA (9 Yenr cariumen end\osete den f steer edt pls onpireve, A en enaier ge Fito the Mey bs eneae Denies pease Wie He Fe A A Some A ra W Rw yew Pred panies WA packed Geckilite we clawad VY qaae ab mwas Wied os Say iE Et sty Bllesemtein mere Guegeety Paid enki, tote leet we con andy WHE HOE ae cy Oy depts aah Seem Oo sue aaseasmedr ob Mee commt Wesersse te ps pele SO Peastntn we agdetel ee te! de we omednny Atel: Cy ee ee te Bend Gone Rew prentrdeliePharmacy Residency Presentation Evaluation Form Presentation Title: Speaker: Date: Scoring Rubrie 1: Not Accomplished 2: Needs Development 3: Acceptable 4: Mostly Accomplished 5: Accomplished Speaker Balaton z [scoring | Comments ‘The speaker maintained appropriate eye contact #23 throughout the presentation. ‘The presenter spoke ina strong.voice at an appropriate |i 2 3 44)5 ave throughout the presentation ‘The sides were visually appeating, easytoread,and "|i 2(3) 4 5 contained no spelling errors. The speaker was dearly Inowledgeableon Weope |i > 35 \Geemed enowmcdgcalae Obout presented. Widterjal presented Wut mayor prot OS The speaker actively engaged the audience In this 1G 345 | Wathon wore detaicd Wtf learning actvty. tec_Yetowy ‘The speaker adequately answered questions and 12 é ja 5 provided clarification when necessary. ‘The presentation was unbiased and provided a fair 1234/5 balance of information. Quality of Presentation ‘The program was organized and presented in a logical 123 ® 5 fashion. ‘The knowiedge geined at this program wilbeappleable [12 (3) 4 5 to my daily practice. The program met my expectations based on the learning, | 12 5 objectives. Overall, | gained new information and knowledge onthe |i 2 Ga 5 subject presented. The program subject and degree of detail were _ TIDes appropriate for the audience. ‘The program subject and degree of detail were T27@as appropriate for the time allotted. (approx. 30-45min) Comments: (Strengths/Weaknesses/Areas for Improvement?) —fuydulrie quisions— whe. witha. ance, to det nvolvewent OWA, NOt Wn evidod The tang seemed off ard if WAS Ovficait to Al it Yor were ActHaliy audnce, TOS TRER MTR WYO TCEN TMU AWC aoe ek Wval oy uaa ‘uspartin gas : Nd Mort oF y Wats] Comme ndahors - what cto we do with SUM Comtortalnle in front OF ander the dato preded Refrenus? | duastig ton audrenee repeat ,