Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Toa - Investment Property - Agriculture
Toa - Investment Property - Agriculture
2 It is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity; and The cost of the investment property can be measured reliably.
4.2 Recognition principles are similar to those contained in PAS 16. 5. MEASUREMENT 5.1 Measurement at Recognition 5.1.1 An investment property shall be measured initially at cost, including transaction charges. Again, the principles for determining cost are similar to those contained in PAS 16, in particular for replacement and subsequent expenditure. 5.1.2. However, property held under an operating lease shall be measured initially using the principles contained in PAS 17, Leasesat the lower of the fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. A key mater here is that the item accounted for at fair value is not the property itself but the lease interest. 5.2. Measurement After Recognition An entity shall select either the cost model or the fair value model for all its investment property. There are, however, two exceptions. If an entity elects to classify property held under an operating lease as investment property, then it must select the fair value model for all its investment property. The second exception is I the entity has investment property backing liabilities that pay a return linked to the fair value of the assets; if so, regardless of which model is selected for measuring such investment property, the entity continues to have a choice of models for its other investment property. 5.3. Fair Value Model 5.3.1. If the fair model value is selected, after initial recognition, investment property shall be measured at fair value. Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arms-length transaction. 5.3.2 Any gains and losses arising from changes in fair value shall be recognized in the income statement. This is quite a radical divergence from previous practices but is consistent with other Standards wherein assets are held in part for capital appreciation. The issue is that any gain on such remeasurement is unrealized, and, in many jurisdictions, the retained earnings of an entity are considered distributable (although some jurisdictions have legal definitions of distributable reserves). Consequently, many entities then transfer an amount from retained earnings to a capital reserve that may be treated as distributable only upon disposal of the related asset. 5.3.3 When applying the fair value model, the fair values should reflect the market conditions at the balance sheet date. Valuations, therefore, carried out at date too far removed from the balance sheet date and would be unacceptable. In addition, care needs to be taken as equipment, such as lifts, air conditioning, and the like, may be recognized as separate assets. Valuations usually include such assets, which should not be double counted. 5.3.4 If, on acquisition, it is not possible to determine fair value reliably on a continuing basis, then the asset shall be measured using the cost model under PAS 16 until disposal. Residual value shall be assumed to be zero. Therefore, it possible for an entity to hold investment property, some of which is measured at fair value and some under the cost model. If an entity measures investment property at fair value, it shall continue to do so until disposal, even if readily available market data become less frequent or less readily available.
5.3.5
5.4 Cost Model An entity that selects the cost model shall measure all of its investment property in accordance with PAS 16s requirements for that model except those classified as held for sale in accordance with PFRS 5. 5.5 Transfers
5.5.1
3 Transfers to and from investment property shall be made when and only when there is a change of use evidence by Commencement of owner occupation (transfer from investment property to property, plant, and equipment) Commencement of development with a view to sale (transfer from investment property to inventories) End of owner occupation (transfer from property, plant, and equipment to investment property) Commencement of an operating lease to another party (transfer from inventories or property, plant, and equipment to investment property) End of construction or development (transfer from property under construction, covered by PAS 16, to investment property) In cases where the fair value model is not used, transfers between classification are made at the carrying value: the lower of cost and net realizable value if inventories, or cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses if property, plant, and equipment. If owner-occupied property is transferred to investment property that is to be carried at fair value, then, up to the change, PAS 16 is applied. This is to say, any revaluation in fair value, is treated in accordance with PAS 16. Transfers from investment property at fair value to property, plant, and equipment shall be at fair value, which becomes deemed cost. For transfers from inventories to investment properties that are to be carried at fair value, the remeasurement to fair value is recognized in the income statement. When a property under construction is completed and transferred to investment property to be carried at fair value, the remeasurement to fair value is recognized in the income statement.
5.5.2
5.5.3
6 DISPOSALS An investment property shall be derecognized on disposal or at the time that no benefit is expected from future use or disposal. Any gain or loss is determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount and is recognized in the income statement. 7 DISCLOSURES 7.1 Fair Value and Cost Model An entity shall disclose Whether it applies the cost or fair value model If it applies the fair value model, whether and under what circumstances property interest held under operating leases are classified and accounted as investment property When classification is difficult, the criteria used to distinguish investment property, owneroccupied property and property held for disposal in the ordinary course of business The methods used and significant assumptions made in determining fair value The extent to which fair values are based on assessments by an independent and qualified valuer. If there are no such valuations, that fact shall be stated The amount recognized in the income statement for o Rental income from investment property o Direct operating expenses that generated rental income o Direct operating expenses that did not generate rental income o Cumulative change in fair value recognized in the income statement on sale of investment property from a pool of assets in which the cost model is used to a pool in which the fair value model is used Existence and amounts of restrictions on the realizability of investment property; or for the remittance of income and proceeds on disposal Contractual obligations to purchase, construct, or develop investment property or for repairs, maintenance, or enhancements 7.2 Fair Value Model
7.2.1 7.2.2
4 If an entity applies the fair value model, it shall also disclose a reconciliation of the opening and closing carrying values of investment property, showing Additions, showing separately acquisitions, subsequent expenditure, and additions through business combinations Assts classified as held for sale under PFRS 5 Net gains or losses from fair value adjustments Net exchange differences arising on translation of financial statements in a different reporting currency Transfers to and from inventories and owner-occupied property Other changes When a valuation for an investment property is adjusted to avoid double counting of assets such as equipment that may be recognized separately, a reconciliation of the adjustments shall be disclosed. When fair value cannot be measured reliably and the asset is stated in accordance with PAS 16, such assets shall be disclosed separately from those at fair value. In addition to the movement disclosures set out above, disclosures shall be made of the Description of properties stated in accordance with PAS 16 Explanation as to why fair value cannot be reliably measured Range of estimates, if possible within which the fair value is highly likely to fall Disposals of investment property not carried at fair value
7.2.3
7.3 Cost Model For investment properties measured under the cost model, an entity shall disclose Depreciation methods used Useful lives or depreciation rates used A reconciliation of the opening and closing gross carrying amounts and the accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, showing o Addition, showing separately acquisitions, subsequent expenditure, and addition through business combinations Assets classified as held FOR SALE UNDER PFRS 5 Impairment losses recognized and reversed Net exchange difference Transfers to and from inventories and owner-occupied property Other changes The fair value of investment property and, if fair value cannot be reliably measured o Explanation as to why fair value cannot be reliably measured o Range of estimates, if possible within which the fair value is highly likely to fall o Disposals of investment property not carried at fair value
6 3.5 In some cases, market prices or values may not be available for an asset in its present conditions.In these cases,the entity can used the present value of the expected net cash flow from the asset discounted at the current market pre tax rate.In some cirumtances,cost maybe an indicator of fair value,especially were little biological transformation has taken place or the impact of biological transformation on the price is not expected to be significant 4.GAINS AND LOSSES 4.1Any gain on the initial recognition of biological asset at fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs and any changes in the fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs of biological asset during the reporting period are included in profir or loss for the period.Any gain on the intial recognition of agricultural produce at fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs will be included in profit or loss for the period to which it relates.All costs related to biological asset that are measured at fair value are recognized in profit or loss where incurred,except for costs to purchase biological asset. 4.2 The standard does not explicitly prescribe how to account for subsequent expenditures related to biological asset.A gain or loss therefore arise when an animal is born,plants and animals grow,plants are harvested or animal generate agricultural produce. Losses can arise on the initial recognition of the purchase of the animals, as their fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs are likely to be less than the purchase price plus any transaction and transportation costs. 5 FAIR VALUE RELIABILITY 5.1 PAS 41 presumes that fair value can be measured reliably for a biological asset.However,it is possible that this presumption can be rebutted for a biological asset that,when it is first recognized does not have a quoted market price in an active market and for which other valuation methods are clearly in appropriate or unworkable.In this case,the asset is measured at costs less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses. All the other biological asset of the entity still must be measured at fair value. If circumstances do change and fair value becomes reliably measurable,then the entity must change its valuation method to fair value less point-of-sale costs. 5.2 If a non current biological assets meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale or is included in a disposal group in accordance with PFRS 5, then t is presume that fair value can be measured reliably. 5.3 In determining costs,the depreciation,and impairment losses,the entity should used PAS 2, PAS 16, and PAS 36 6. GOVERNMENT GRANTS. 6.1 A government grant that is related to a biologiacal asset measured at fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs should be recognized as income when the government grant becomes receivable. If there are conditions attached to the government then the government shall be recognized only when those conditions are net.PAS 20 is applied only to a government grant that is related to a biological aset which have been measured at costs less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. 6.2 PAS 41 is not deal with government grants that relates to agricultural produce,These grants may include subsidies.Subsidies are normally payable when the produce is solved and would therefore be recognized as income in the sale. 7. ISSUES IN PAS 41 7.1 The change in the fair value of biological assets is twofold: There can be a physical change through growth and there can be a price change. Seperate disclosure of these two elements is encouraged but not required. Where biological asset are harvested, then fair value measurement stops at the time of the harvest, and PAS 2,Inventories,appiles after that date. 7.2 Agricultural land is accounted for under PAS 16, but biological assets that are attached to the land are measured separately from the land. 8. DISCLOSURES An entity shall disclose the aggregate gain or loss that are arises on the initial recognition of biological assets and agricultural produce and from the change in value less point-of-sale costs of the biological assets. A description of each group of biological asset is also required. If it is not disclosed anywhere else in the financial statements, then the entity shall also set out the nature of each activities and non
7 financial measures or estimates of the physical quantity of each group of the entitys biological asset at period end. It should be supply the same information for the output for agricultural produce during the period. The methods and assumptions applied in determining fair value should also be disclosed. The fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs of agricultural produce harvested during the period shall be disclosed of the point of harvest. The existence in carrying the amount of biological asset whose title restricted in any biological assets placed as security should be disclosed. The amount of any commitments on the development or acquisition of biological assets and managements financial risks strategies should also be disclosed A reconciliation of the changes in the carrying amount of biological assets showing separately changes in value, purchases, sales, harvesting, business combination, and exchanged differences should be disclosed. Where fair value cannot be measured, then additional disclosures is required including the description of the asset, an explanation of the circumstances it possible a range within which the fair value is likely to fall, any gain or loss recognized on disposal, depreciation method and useful lives or depreciation rates. The gross carrying amount on the accumulated depreciation should also be shown. If the fair value of biological assets previously measured at costs less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses is now ascertainable, then additional disclosures are required such as description of the biological assets, an explanation as to why fair value is now reliably measurable, and the effect of the change. Regarding government grants, disclosures should be made as to the nature and extent of the grants, any conditions that have not been fulfilled, in any significant decreases in the expected level of the grants.