Chamblee Townhomes

3.C.
City of Chamblee
City Council Agenda Item
Department: City Council
Prepared By: Amy Canales
Initiator: Amy Canales
ZONING (ID # 3473)
SUBJECT: PZ2022-993 - CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES AND MIXED-USE FLU MAP,

REZONING, DCI
Meeting Date: May 17, 2022, 7:30 PM
REQUESTED ACTION:
DENIAL of the requested Future Land Use Map Amendment, Rezoning, Development of
Community Impact (DC) and the concurrent variances and waivers
REQUEST SUMMARY:
A summary of the project is as follows:
• Replat the property to combine the two parcels.
• Remove existing impervious surfaces and grade the site, including filling-in areas
designated as a Flood Zone on the FEMA FIRM Map.
• Construct 141 single-family attached townhomes.
• Construct 2 mixed-use buildings located at the front of the site facing New Peachtree
Rd., each will be 2 stories tall and have approximately 4,000 total gross sq ft of floor
area, split evenly between the floors, and contain 4 multi-family units on the top floor,
and commercial/retail/restaurant uses on the ground floor.
• Construct amenities located in the middle of the site, including green space, a swimming
pool, and clubhouse.
• Construct an above ground 10-ft-deep detention pond near the southeastern corner of
the lot.
• Install retaining walls throughout the site:
• A 48-ft wall with modular block abutting the townhomes and facing the
residential properties located south of the property
• A 14-ft wall with modular block facing the townhomes west of the property
• A wall abutting the businesses located west of the property, height and material
is unspecified
• A wall abutting the parking lot located at the front of the property, height and
material is unspecified
Packet Pg. 164

3.C.2
• Install landscaping and a 12-ft-wide multi-use trail along New Peachtree Rd.
The applicant requests the following concurrent variances and waivers from Title 2 & 3 of the
UDO:
1. Variance from Section 240-13(b)(1)(n) to allow 46.8% of the townhouse units to be rear
entry as opposed to the required 50% of all townhouse units.
2. Variance from Section 230-6(d) to allow retaining wall heights to exceed 12 feet at the
heights shown on the grading plan.
3. Variance from Section 230-27(11) to allow the mixed-use buildings along New Peachtree
Road to not have roofs surfaced with a heat reflective material.
4. Variance from Section 240-13(b)(1)(i) to allow the 200 square feet of private yard space
for each townhome unit to be located in a combination of the front and rear as opposed
to exclusively in either the front or rear yards.
5. Variance from Section 240-13(b)(1)(r) to allow specific townhomes to not provide a
covered front porch that is less than 8 feet wide and 6 feet deep.
6. Variance from Section 230-26 to allow an 8-foot-wide supplemental zone instead of the
required 10-foot-wide supplemental zone to accommodate the installation of the New
Peachtree Road Trail.
7. Variance from Section 230-26(a) to provide less than the required 5-foot landscape strip
along the private drives internal to the development.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the analysis using the standards and criteria found in Chapter 280 and Chapter 300 of
the UDO, Staff recommends DENIAL of the following DCI, Rezoning, Future Land Use (FLU) Map
Amendment and Concurrent Variance and Waiver requests in application PZ2022-993:
1. Future Land Use Map Amendment from Mixed-Use to Medium Density Residential
2. Rezoning from IT to VR
3. Development of Community Impact (DCI)
4. 7 Concurrent Variances and Waivers
Attachment List:
PZ2022-933 Chamblee Townhomes Staff Memo (PDF)
Attachment 1 - Site Plans and Architectural Elevations (PDF)
Attachment 2 - Applications and Letters of Intent (PDF)
Attachment 3 - Maps (PDF)
Packet Pg. 165

3.C.2
Attachment 4 - Traffic Study (PDF)

Attachment 5 - Dekalb County Schools Report (PDF)
Attachment 6 - MTP Excerpt Project B-28 (PDF)
Attachment 7 - Proposed FLU Map (PDF)
Attachment 8 - Proposed Official Zoning Map (PDF)
Attachment 9 - Ordinance (PDF)
Attachment 10 - Letters from the Public (PDF)
Review:
Amy Canales Completed 05/05/2022 4:59 PM
Jon Walker Completed 05/06/2022 1:15 PM
City Council Completed 05/12/2022 6:00 PM
Packet Pg. 166

3.C.2.a
Attachment: PZ2022-933 Chamblee Townhomes Staff Memo (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map, Rezoning,
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Public Hearing Date: May 12, 2022
Item #: PZ2022-993
CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES AND MIXED-USE BUILDINGS –FUTURE LAND USE

AMENDMENT, REZONING AND DCI WITH CONCURRENT VARIANCES AND WAIVERS
Project Name: Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use Buildings

Applicant: Matthew Lynch, Grover Corlew Acquisitions
Owner: Nisha Marie Vijay Anand as Trustee of the Nisha Marie Anand Family
Trust and Nisha Marie Anand as Trustee of the Peter Vijay Anand
Family Irrevocable Trust #2
Site Addresses: 5007 New Peachtree Rd and 1100 Vijay Dr
Parcel Numbers: 18 278 03 060 and 18 278 03 121
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Proposed Project: 141 townhome units; and 8 multi-family units over approximately 4,000 sq ft of commercial space
Requests: Future Land Use Map Amendment from mixed use to medium-density residential, Rezoning from IT to VR,
Development of Community Impact (DCI), eight concurrent variance and waiver requests.
Summary Analysis:
• The site is bounded by townhome development, single-family detached neighborhood, and commercial uses.
• This corridor of New Peachtree Rd has been in transition from light industrial uses to residential since the
Rezoning in 2015 for the Townsend at Ashford Park townhomes.
• Recent increased residential development supports the need for more commercial uses.
• The site is constrained by a floodplain in the west and south of the property, and approximately 40 units would
be built in the flood plain. A detention pond and compensatory storage is part of the applicant’s flood phasing
plan. The results of the Flood Study are forthcoming, but without the calculations, the proposed viability
cannot be determined.
• The applicant indicates more commercial/mixed-use is not feasible due to the limited linear length of frontage
along New Peachtree Rd. However, design alternatives could remedy visibility concerns.
• The current proposal does not conform with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan, which remains valid for
mixed-use.
Therefore, Staff recommends DENIAL of the application package.
Page 1 of 20
Case Number: PZ2022-993
DRB Meeting: April 27, 2022
City Council Work Session (Public Hearing): May 12, 2022 Packet Pg. 167
3.C.2.a
Clairmont Rd
Current Zoning: 5007 New Peachtree Rd and 1100 Vijay Dr: Industrial Transitional
(IT) - This zoning district is intended for adaptive reuse of
properties in which low impact industrial and commercial activities
are permitted and where a transitional use is needed between
commercial and light industrial uses and less intense residential or
commercial districts while maintaining an attractive external
environment.
Current Uses: The subject property contains various automobile mechanic,
construction businesses, and warehousing uses, a movie
production studio at southern end of the site, and a garden center
located at the site frontage along New Peachtree Rd.
Page 2 of 20
PZ2022-993: Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use Packet Pg. 168
3.C.2.a
Surrounding Land Uses: North – VC: Norfolk Southern and MARTA rail lines; IT Offices
South – NR-1: Single-family detached residential
East – IT:GDOT District 7 Office; NR-1: Single-family detached
residential
West – VR: Ashford Park Townhomes
Character Area and Future Development Map:

The proposed project falls within the “Mixed-Use” future land use classification, which
recommends 6-80 units per acres, any combination of residential, commercial, office, and
public/institutional uses; and within the “New Peachtree Rd” character area of the Comprehensive
Plan. The vision for this character area is to gradually transition from light industrial and offices to
a mixture of uses including medium-density, mixed-use developments that are more compatible
with nearby residential neighborhoods. The zoning districts most appropriate for this character
area are VR, CC, CVC, and VC.
Additionally, the Chamblee Mobility Plan (MTP) calls for a segment of the New Peachtree Road
Trail multi-use path (project B-28, on pg 124 of the MTP), to connect to the 12-ft-wide Chamblee
Tucker Rd Trail.
Site Description:
The approximately 12.38-acre site consists of 2 parcels located on the south side of New Peachtree
Rd, to the west of the intersection with Clairmont Rd. Both parcels are currently zoned Industrial
Transitional (IT). There is a single curb cut off of New Peachtree Rd, where the private street named
Vijay Dr provides access to the site. There is an approximately 5-ft-wide sidewalk located behind
the sunken granite curbing along New Peachtree Rd.
The lot slopes gradually from the frontage along New Peachtree Rd, where the grade is
approximately 1040 ft above sea level, down toward the south end of the site where a 6-ft-tall
wooden privacy fence is located, then drops off precipitously, from approximately 985 ft above sea
level to 960 ft above sea level towards a detention pond on the site, and continues to slope down
towards the residential neighborhood to the south at 950 ft elevation at the rear lot line. There is
a tall modular block retaining wall, over 12-ft in height located adjacent to the property supporting
the Ashford Park townhome site to the west. There are areas of floodplain located along the west
and south areas of the lot.
History of the Property:

There is no zoning case history found for the property. Neighbors located in the single-family
residential neighborhood south of the property have voiced concerns of stormwater drainage and
noise coming from the property to Code Enforcement in the past.
Page 3 of 20
3.C.2.a
Description of the Proposed Project:
A summary of the project is as follows:
• Replat the property to combine the two parcels.
• Remove existing impervious surfaces and grade the site, including filling-in areas
designated as a Flood Zone on the FEMA FIRM Map.
• Construct 141 single-family attached townhomes:
• The townhome units will be 3-story tall units and constructed of a mix of different
colors of brick, cement fiber lap siding, cement fiber board and batten and cement
fiber shake shingle.
• Roofs will be constructed with asphalt shingles; and porch coverings will be
standing seam metal.
• Construct 2 mixed-use buildings located at the front of the site facing New Peachtree Rd:
• The buildings will be constructed with brick, fiber cement panels and trim, with
metal stairs and awnings, and asphalt shingle roofs.
• They would be 2 stories and have approximately 4,000 total gross sq ft of floor
area, split evenly between the floors, and contain 4 multi-family units on the top
floor, and commercial/retail/restaurant uses on the ground floor
• Construct amenities located in the middle of the site, including green space, a swimming
pool, and clubhouse.
• Construct an above ground 10-ft-deep detention pond near the southeastern corner of
the lot.
• Install retaining walls throughout the site:
• A 48-ft wall with modular block abutting the townhomes and facing the residential
properties located south of the property
• A 14-ft wall with modular block facing the townhomes west of the property
• A wall abutting the businesses located west of the property, height and material is
unspecified
• A wall abutting the parking lot located at the front of the property, height and
material is unspecified
• Install landscaping and a 12-ft-wide multi-use trail along New Peachtree Rd.
Page 4 of 20
3.C.2.a
Applicable UDO Standards:
Required Proposed
Rear-entry townhomes 50% 46.8%
Retaining Wall Height 12 feet(max) Varies, with max of
46 feet
Parking spaces 128 min 360
Retaining wall height (max)
- Rear or side yard 8 ft max 17 feet
Required streetscape
- Landscape zone
Private Streets 5 feet None
New Peachtree Rd 5 feet 5 feet
- Supplemental zone 10 feet 8 feet
New Peachtree Rd
Private yard space for townhomes 200 sqft None
Future Development Map Amendment Criteria:

The following review and approval criteria, described in Sec. 280-17, shall be used in reviewing and
taking action on all Comprehensive Plan and Future Development Map amendments, including
changing conditions to existing zoning:
1.Whether the Future Development Map amendment proposal is compatible with the
surrounding future land uses as identified in the Future Development Map.
The Future Development Map amendment proposal is not compatible with the surrounding future
land uses due to the lack of retail, restaurant, and commercial spaces along the New Peachtree Rd
corridor in this location. The area is transitioning to a residential area and is in need for such uses
to meet the frequent needs of the residents to the west, south and east.
2.Whether the Future Development Map amendment proposal can be adequately served by
existing transportation facilities and other infrastructure, such as schools, water and sewer.
The FLU proposal will result in a use that will cause some excessive use of existing streets,
transportation facilities, utilities, and schools.
According to a report from DeKalb County Schools, the project will generate approximately 26
students, which will not cause substantial burden on the existing schools.
The Traffic Study prepared and provided by the applicant shows some significant negative impacts
on traffic. The proposed rezoning to VR would increase traffic on existing streets by generating
1,348 net new vehicular trips, according to the traffic impact study (March 2022). The net new trips
for the proposed medium-density residential in the AM Peak Hour is 85 trips and for PM Peak Hour
is 126. The Level of Service Analysis for 8th Street at Caldwell Rd for projected project build-out is
A. The Level of Service for New Peachtree Road at Clairmont Road intersection are C and D. The
Level of Service for New Peachtree Rd at Vijay Dr on EB and WB is A, and on NB are F and E.
Page 5 of 20
3.C.2.a
The project will have to receive sewer capacity from DeKalb County during permitting to receive
development permits.
The project may impact flooding and stormwater, which cannot be determined without the Flood
Study.
3.Whether the Future Development Map amendment proposal negatively impacts natural and
historic resources identified by the City.
The floodplain that encumbers a portion of the property will be greatly impacted by grading and
construction of buildings. The applicant has not submitted an adequate flood mitigation plan. The
applicant has stated that a Flood Study is currently being conducted on the property, however, staff
does not have information or data to indicate the impact of the development on the floodplain, and
the impacts that the work will have on the downstream properties in the neighborhood to the south,
and the implications the changes would have on the FEMA FIRM Map and flood insurance rates.
4.Whether the Future Development Map amendment proposal is in the best interest of the City
and the public good and whether the proposal protects the health and welfare of its citizens.
The proposal is not in the best interest of the City and public good. It does not address the needs for
more commercial and retail that has been envisioned for this area in the FLU map. In addition,
without adequate flood mitigation, the townhomes, and the abutting neighborhood may be subject
to flooding that negatively impact them.
5.Whether the property to be affected by the Future Development Map amendment proposal
has a reasonable economic use as currently designated on the Future Development Map.
The property does not reasonable economic use as currently designated. The Mixed-use would
provide the convenient goods and services that the area needs.
6.Whether the amendment proposal meets the policies and intent established in
the Future Development Map.
The amendment proposal does not meet the policies and intent of the Future Development Map.
The policies and implementation measures include:
• Market the area for mixed-use redevelopment and economic investment.

• Encourage the location of business and art incubators and adaptive reuse of buildings.
• Encourage the location of community amenities to this area to serve new residents, such
as daily needs shopping.
• Require developers to build new sidewalks of at least 8 feet to increase walkability.
• Guidelines for the area that would encourage an industrial look and feel.
The proposed project does not provide the appropriate commercial density that is necessary to meet
the policies above. The property is the largest site along this corridor and is the closest to the MARTA
station, at approximately 0.4 miles from the closest point of the lot to the nearest station entrance.
It is located adjacent to 94 townhome units, and just up the road from the US Gypsum site properties
that are poised for redevelopment to include residential uses. The 4,000 sq ft of commercial space,
Page 6 of 20
3.C.2.a
or 1.5% of the total square footage that is proposed, does not provide meaningful mix of uses to
meet the daily needs of the neighborhood. Creating a concentration of residential properties
without the commercial component to create a true mixed-use development would present an
impediment to the viability of the area as having shops, restaurants, offices, and employment
opportunities, and employment opportunities in the future.
Zoning Map Amendment Review and Approval Criteria:

The following review and approval criteria, described in Sec. 280-17(b), must be used in reviewing,
and taking action on all zoning map amendment applications:
1. The existing uses and zoning of nearby property.
The approximately 12.38-acre, IT-zoned, parcel is bordered by Norfolk Southern and MARTA rail
lines zoned VC to the north, and construction offices zoned IT just northwest of the property.
One of the construction offices includes a building and site that was recently remodeled from a
light-industrial use to office use. The GDOT District 7 Office zoned IT is located east of the
property. Single-family detached residential zoned NR-1 surrounds the subject property on the
east, and south. The GDOT District 7 office abuts the property directly to the east along New
Peachtree Rd. The parcels to the south, and some to the east, are zoned Neighborhood
Residential (NR-1). The 94-unit Townsend at Ashford Park fee-simple townhome development
abuts the property directly to the west, except along the frontage of New Peachtree Rd, where
it abuts the construction offices.
2. The extent to which property values are diminished by the particular zoning restrictions.
The subject property is limited in what can be constructed under the light industrial zoning
district. While the proposed VR zoning district would allow for various types of residential
dwellings and commercial businesses, it would be more appropriate with meaningful ratio of
mixed-use.
3. The extent to which the possible reduction of property values of the subject property
promotes the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the public.
The value of the subject property would not be reduced.
4. The relative harm to the public as compared to the hardship imposed upon the individual.
Without the Flood Study, potential public harm cannot be determined. The site is currently
zoned for an Industrial end user, and the current plan requests to install housing and commercial
uses to the public. The increase in residential units, and the absence of appropriate non-
residential projects, would pose public harm.
5. The suitability of the subject property for the zoning proposed.
The project would be consistent with the intent of the VR zoning district, only if the percent of
non-residential were greater than the approximately 1.5% of total square footage proposed. As
proposed, the project is not in compliance with the recommendation of the property as a mixed-
use development in the FLU Map.
Page 7 of 20
3.C.2.a
6. The length of time the property has been vacant as zoned, considered in the context of land
development in the area in the vicinity of the property.
The property is not vacant. It contains various automobile-related and light-industrial uses that
are currently operating.
7. Whether the zoning proposal will permit a use that is suitable in view of the use and
development of adjacent and nearby property.
The zoning proposal would permit a use that is suitable in view of the use and development of
adjacent and nearby properties, only if it met the intent of the FLU Map to provide a true mixed-
use development.
8. Whether the zoning proposal will adversely affect the existing use or usability of adjacent or
nearby property.
Amending the zoning map will adversely affect the existing use or usability of adjacent or nearby
property if the specific site plan does not address the current flooding and stormwater issues or
increase the proposed mix of uses on the site.
9. Whether the property to be affected by the zoning proposal has a reasonable economic use
as currently zoned.
The subject property has limited reasonable economic use as currently zoned. Residential
development is not allowed under the current zoning classification, which restricts economic
viability options.
10. Whether the zoning proposal will result in a use which will or could cause an excessive or
burdensome use of existing streets, transportation facilities, utilities, or schools.
The zoning proposal will result in a use that will cause some excessive use of existing streets,
The Traffic Study prepared and provided by the applicant shows some significant negative
impacts on traffic. The proposed rezoning to VR would increase traffic on existing streets by
generating 1,348 net new vehicular trips, according to the traffic impact study (March 2022).
The net new trips for the proposed medium-density residential in the AM Peak Hour is 85 trips
and for PM Peak Hour is 126. The Level of Service Analysis for 8th Street at Caldwell Rd for
projected project build-out is A. The Level of Service for New Peachtree Road at Clairmont Road
intersection are C and D. The Level of Service for New Peachtree Rd at Vijay Dr on EB and WB is
A, and on NB are F and E.
The project will have to receive sewer capacity from DeKalb County during permitting to receive
development permits. The project may impact flooding and stormwater, which cannot be
determined without the Flood Study.
Page 8 of 20
3.C.2.a
11. Whether the zoning proposal is in conformity with the policy and intent of the future
development map.
The zoning proposal is not consistent with policies of the Future Development (FLU) Map, and
the Comprehensive Plan’s recommendation for the area to transition to mixed-use. The FLU
Map and Comp Plan envisions the subject property to serve as a primary location for businesses,
art, and community amenities for surrounding and future residents. The proposal is
predominantly residential townhome development, with only approximately 1.5% of the total
square footage being commercial, which detracts from the proposed vision, and inhibits the
viability for surrounding industrial/office uses to transition in the future.
12. Whether there are other existing or changing conditions affecting the use and development
of the property which gives supporting grounds for either approval or disapproval of the
zoning proposal.
The site is constrained by a FEMA Floodplain along the south and west side of the property. The
submitted site plan shows approximately 40 townhome units would be constructed within the
floodplain. Currently, the applicant is completing a Flood Study to determine the feasibility of
the project. The applicant has submitted a flood phasing plan, which anticipates removing units
to install compensatory storage to alleviate stormwater issues. The potential outcomes of the
Flood Study would result in the removal of townhome units, and a drastic change to the
submitted site plan. To build in the floodplain, the City is required to submit a CLOMR
(Conditional Letter of Map Revision) to FEMA, to revise the floodplain map; a completed Flood
Study will determine the needed improvements to address stormwater issues.
Changing conditions also include increased number of residential units, which necessitate
adding more non-residential to the area for economic health and diversity. The proposed 1.5%
of non-residential space does not fully support that need. The potential implications of the site
currently, with the information provided to staff thus far, and the future land use policy
intending for mixed-use, lead staff to recommend denial of the rezoning.
DCI Review and Approval Criteria:

The following review and approval criteria, described in Sec. 280-24, must be used in reviewing,
and taking action on all DCI applications:
1. Design shall be in harmony with the general character of the neighborhood and surrounding
area, considering factors such as mass, placement, height, changing land use patterns, and
consistency of exterior architectural treatment, especially in areas of historic and special
design interest.
The general design and layout of the townhomes is compatible with the characteristics of the
surrounding residential areas. There are no areas of historic or special design interest on the
site.
Page 9 of 20
3.C.2.a
2. Design components shall be planned such that they are physically and aesthetically related
and coordinated with other elements of the project and surrounding environment to ensure
visual continuity of design.
The design components of the structure are consistent with other elements of the project and
the surrounding environment. The proposed townhome units are primarily composed of brick
and cement fiber lap siding. The mixed-use buildings will be built with brick, and fiber cement
panel, with metal stairs and awnings. The applicant has requested a variance to install non-
heat-reflective roofing materials on the mixed-use buildings.
3. Design shall protect scenic views, particularly those of open space, and utilize natural
features of the site.
Without the Flood Study, it cannot be determined if the design will protect the floodplain. The
lot is nearly completely built out, except for unmaintained areas in the south area around the
existing stormwater detention pond. The current design does not provide adequate information
or data to confirm its impact on the floodplain, or whether the project will improve the current
stormwater issues impacting the downstream residential properties to the south.
4. Design shall protect adjacent properties from negative visual and functional impacts.
The proposed retaining walls will create negative visual and functional impacts. The highest
wall proposed is 48 ft and will be located on the south end of the property, but outside of the
30 ft zoning buffer, which is also adjacent to the single-family homes. The City currently permits
retaining walls up to 8 ft by right, and up to 12 ft in certain circumstances when tiered, and
having a wall exceed regulations by 40 ft may negatively impact the neighbors to the south. In
addition, the site has received complaints from the neighbors to the south over the years
regarding stormwater runoff. Staff is requesting a completed Flood Study to determine
appropriate mitigation.
5. Design shall respect the historical character of the immediate area as integral parts of
community life in the City and shall protect and preserve structures and spaces which provide
a significant link within these areas.
The immediate area to the south and east have a residential history going back to the late-
1940’s and early 1950’s when the original houses were built on Hickory Rd and Dyer Circle. The
subject lot and abutting and nearby lots along New Peachtree Rd have a history since at least
as far back as the 1950’s as light industrial use, but those uses are being phased out as the
corridor transitions to residential of appropriate scale and density. The proposed redevelopment
of lots along the corridor represents the opportunity for the lots to be redeveloped in harmony
with the surroundings.
6. All exterior forms, attached to buildings or not, shall be in conformity with, and secondary
to, the building.
Exterior forms, such as the mail kiosk and clubhouse, and fencing and gates, will be in
conformity with and secondary to the buildings.
Page 10 of 20
3.C.2.a
7. The proposed development is suitable in view of the use and development of adjacent and
nearby property.
This proposed development would permit a use that is partially suitable in view of the use and
development of adjacent and nearby property. Townhomes provide the appropriate transition
for the area; however the project lacks the commercial element envisioned for the area.
8. The proposed development does not adversely affect the existing use or usability of adjacent
or nearby property.
Amending the zoning map will adversely affect the existing use or usability of adjacent or nearby
property if the specific site plan does not address the current flooding and stormwater issues or
increase the proposed mix of uses on the site.
9. The proposed development does not result in a use which will or could cause an excessive or
burdensome use of existing streets, transportation facilities, utilities or schools.
The zoning proposal will result in a use that will cause some excessive use of existing streets,
The Traffic Study prepared and provided by the applicant shows some significant negative
impacts on traffic. The proposed rezoning to VR would increase traffic on existing streets by
generating 1,348 net new vehicular trips, according to the traffic impact study (March 2022).
The net new trips for the proposed medium-density residential in the AM Peak Hour is 85 trips
and for PM Peak Hour is 126. The Level of Service Analysis for 8th Street at Caldwell Rd for
projected project build-out is A. The Level of Service for New Peachtree Road at Clairmont Road
intersection are C and D. The Level of Service for New Peachtree Rd at Vijay Dr on EB and WB is
A, and on NB are F and E.
The project would have to receive sewer capacity from DeKalb County during permitting to
receive development permits. The project may impact flooding and stormwater, which cannot
be determined without the Flood Study.
10. The proposed development is in conformance with the applicable zoning district.
The proposed development is not in conformance with the current zoning district, IT, however,
the applicant has applied to be rezoned to VR. If granted, the development will generally be in
conformance with VR zoning regulations. The applicant is requested 7 variances and 1 waiver
to obtain full compliance.
11. The proposed development is in conformance with the provisions of the future development
plan articulated in the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
The development is not in conformance with the future development plan, as the City envisions
a true mixed-use development on the subject property. However, the applicant has applied for
a Future Land Use Amendment, to change the future land use from mixed-use to medium
Page 11 of 20
3.C.2.a
density residential. The development would comply with the proposed “Medium-Density
Residential” classification, which recommends 6-9 units per acre of single-family attached
housing and multi-family housing. The “New Peachtree Rd District” envisions a mixed-use
employment center, and the primary uses to transition from light industrial to mixed-use. The
proposed development does not align with the current vision of the character area.
Concurrent Variances:
The applicant requests the following concurrent variances from Title 2 and Title 3 (stream buffers)
of the UDO:
1. Variance from Section 240-13(b)(1)(n) to allow 46.8% of the townhouse units to be rear
entry as opposed to the required 50% of all townhouse units.
2. Variance from Section 230-6(d) to allow retaining wall heights to exceed 12 feet at the
heights shown on the grading plan.
3. Variance from Section 230-27(11) to allow the mixed-use buildings along New Peachtree
Road to not have roofs surfaced with a heat reflective material.
4. Variance from Section 240-13(b)(1)(i) to allow the 200 square feet of private yard space for
each townhome unit to be located in a combination of the front and rear as opposed to
exclusively in either the front or rear yards.
5. Variance from Section 240-13(b)(1)(r) to allow specific townhomes to not provide a covered
front porch that is less than 8 feet wide and 6 feet deep.
6. Variance from Section 230-26 to allow an 8-foot-wide supplemental zone instead of the
required 10-foot-wide supplemental zone to accommodate the installation of the New
7. Variance from Section 230-26(a) to provide less than the required 5-foot landscape strip
along the private drives internal to the development.
Per the review and approval criteria found in Sec. 280-32(a), the Mayor and City Council may
authorize a Variance from the provisions of the UDO only after making the following findings:
a. There are extraordinary and exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular property in
question because of its size, shape or topography;
The lot has an irregular shape in that it is somewhat of a flag lot, being much wider towards the
middle and rear than it is at the front. The lot has some exceptional topography. The lot slopes
gradually and drops in elevation significantly from the front to the fence I the rear by
approximately 55 ft, then drops off steeply another 25 ft to the rear lot line.
b. The application of this zoning ordinance to the particular piece of property would create an
unnecessary hardship;
The application of this zoning ordinance to the particular piece of property would not create an
unnecessary hardship as it relates to the variance requests.
c. Such conditions are peculiar to the particular piece of property involved;
Page 12 of 20
3.C.2.a
The shape of the lot is somewhat peculiar to the property. For larger properties such as this,
especially deeper ones, significant drops in elevation are not uncommon.
d. Such conditions are not the result of any actions of the property owner; or
The conditions of the lot are not the result of any actions of the property owner or prospective
developer.
e. Relief, if granted, would not cause substantial detriment to the public good nor impair the
purposes or intent of this zoning ordinance.
Relief, if granted from the regulations for which variances have been requested, other than for
the retaining wall height, would generally not cause substantial detriment to the public good,
if the project were appropriate from a policy perspective.
Relief from the retaining wall regulations to install a 48-ft tall retaining wall towering above
the residential neighborhood to the south would cause substantial detriment to the public
good or impair the purposes or intent of the zoning ordinance. Alternative design options for
tiering the walls may exist and be viable.
Applicant’s Concurrent Waiver Requests:

Per Sec. 300-8, only in situations where, because of severe topographical or other conditions
peculiar to the site, strict adherence to the provisions of Title 3 of the UDO would cause an
unnecessary hardship that is not caused by the owner, the Mayor and City Council may, authorize
a waiver from the terms of Title 3 only to the extent that is absolutely necessary and not to an
extent which would violate the intent of Title 3.
The applicant requests the following concurrent Waivers from Title 3 of the UDO:
Waiver from Section 350-2(c) to not provide the required inter-parcel connection between
the subject property and the adjacent property. The City Council may authorize waivers based
on consideration of the following criteria:
1. Features such as topography, high frequency transmission lines, existing trees of
specimen or significant quality, underlying rock, or other condition outside the owner's
control to the extent that strict adherence to said requirements would be unreasonable
and not consistent with the purposes and goals of this code;
There is significant topography regarding the potential for future inter-parcel access to
the property located two lots to the west along the frontage at 4983 New Peachtree Rd.
2. Proposal will not result in any detriment to the public good, including without limitation,
detriment to the interest of the public, and will not result in any harm to the health,
safety or general welfare of the City and its citizens; and
Relief to not provide the capability for inter-parcel connectivity to the adjacent
properties immediately abutting the subject property to the east at 5403 New
Page 13 of 20
3.C.2.a
Peachtree Rd (GDOT), and to the west at 4993 New Peachtree Rd, would be a
detriment to meeting the purpose and intent of the UDO and adopted plans for the
future success of the corridor, however not providing the capability for future inter-
parcel access to 4983 New Peachtree Rd, also to the west, is infeasible due to changes
in topography.
3. Alternative streetscape or building/facade design configurations are provided (where
applicable).
Not applicable to the request.
Other Staff Input:
City Engineer: The 40-foot-high walls at the south end cause concern. The City development code
only allows 8 feet high without special consideration The flood plain filling may not necessarily be
of concern, as the property lies upstream of the flood plain and the flood plain itself has been
environmentally despoiled. During plan review, the City will need to carefully review the
hydrology report to verify that the flood volume presently in the site is entirely detained on the
site before being released into the southward flowing pipe. A well-designed flood control system
may reduce the flooding potential in the subdivision downstream.
DeKalb Fire Marshal: The Fire Marshal expressed concerns for the single access point in and out
of the site, and the proposed surface area to support Fire equipment in case of an emergency.
Economic Development: No comment.
Public Works:
• Recommend continuation of sidewalk from townhomes to new Peachtree Road (or

remove stub of sidewalk that ends in the big retail parking area)
• If pedestrian connection on plan South does not tie into anything currently, then remove
last stub that turns into GDOT property
• Identify whether the applicant is considering private or city sanitation services.
• Be advised, Single-family detached/attached are considered 1 ERU, multifamily is 0.5.
times number of units, commercial is per amount of impervious.
Page 14 of 20
3.C.2.a
Design Review Board Comments and Recommendations:
At the April 27, 2022 Design Review Board (DRB) meeting, the Board heard the application and
made the recommendations below to City Council.
1. The applicant shall work with staff to come up with a solution for design and maintenance
of the empty space between the retaining walls on the west side of the property.
2. Applicant shall tier walls that are over the maximum allowed wall height that are directly
adjacent to any required buffers, in a manner so as that no single tier exceeds the
maximum allowed wall height, and that adequate space for landscaping be provided in
each tier.
3. The applicant shall work with staff to connect to nearby commercial space by meeting the
recommendation in the comprehensive plan (project NS.31 – West Chamblee Pedestrian
Rail Crossing) regarding an at-grade crossing across the railroad tracks, to meet the intent
of the comprehensive plan.
Staff Recommendation:
Based on the analysis of this application, using the standards and criteria found in Chapter 280 and
300 of the UDO, Staff recommends DENIAL of the amending the Future Land Use (FLU) Map
Amendment from mixed use to medium density residential, rezoning from IT to VR, and a
Development of Community Impact (DCI), for the approximately 12.3-acre development parcel in
case PZ2022-933, and DENIAL of all Variance and Waiver requests.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 – Site Plans and Architectural Elevations
Attachment 2 – Application and Letter of Intent
Attachment 3 – Survey of 5007 New Peachtree Rd, et. al.
Attachment 4 – Traffic Impact Study
Attachment 5 – MTP Excerpt Project B-28
Attachment 6 – Maps
Attachment 7 – DeKalb County Student Report
Attachment 8 – Proposed Official Zoning Map
Page 15 of 20
3.C.2.a
Site Visit:
Site when traveling south on Vijay Dr
South end of property abutting residential properties
Page 16 of 20
3.C.2.a
Currently occupied building on east side of property
Back of property, facing North on Vijay Dr
Page 17 of 20
3.C.2.a
Facing west of property, see adjacent townhomes and retaining wall
Townhomes and retaining wall west of property
Page 18 of 20
3.C.2.a
Facing west on New Peachtree Rd, view of adjacent construction/office buildings
View of nursery located at front of property facing New Peachtree Rd. Entrance to Vijay Dr.
Page 19 of 20
3.C.2.a
GDOT District 7 office located east of subject property
Page 20 of 20
3.C.2.b
Attachment: Attachment 1 - Site Plans and Architectural Elevations (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map,
NEW PEACHTREE RD & VIJAY DR - CHAMBLEE, GA
CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES
DESIGN BOOK
April 11,2022
A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPED BY

GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC
Packet Pg. 187

3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Table Of Contents
1. Chamblee Townhomes Development Narrative 21. Landscape Plan
2. Chamblee Townhomes Development Narrative 22. Landscape Plan
3. Variance And Waiver Review And Approval Criteria 23. Overall Site Rendering
4. Variance And Waiver Review And Approval Criteria 24. Site Rendering - Entry Plaza
5. Zoning Map 25. Site Rendering - Pool Amenity
6. Existing Conditions Plan 26. Site Rendering - Passive Amenity
7. Master Site Plan 27. Monument Signage Concept
8. Floodplain Phasing Plan 28. Unit F-1 (2-Bedroom Units) - Perspective
9. Grading Plan 29. Unit F-1 (2-Bedroom Units) - Floor Plan
10. Lot Layout Plan 30. Unit F-1 (2-Bedroom Units) - Elevation
11. Utility Plan 31. Unit TH-1 (3-Bedroom Plus Units) - Perspective
12. Preliminary Plat 32. Unit TH-1 (3-Bedroom Plus Units) - Floor Plan
13. Hydro Basin Map 33. Unit TH-1 (3-Bedroom Plus Units) - Elevations
14. Specimen Tree Report 34. Unit TH-2 (3-Bedroom) - Perspective
15. Specimen Tree Report 35. Unit TH-2 (3-Bedroom) - Floor Plan
16. Specimen Tree Report 36. Unit TH-2 (3-Bedroom) - Elevations
17. Specimen Tree Report 37. Clubhouse - Perspective
18. Specimen Tree Report 38. Clubhouse - Elevations
19. Specimen Tree Location 39. Architectural Materials
20. Landscape Plan 40. Architectural Materials
GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22

Packet Pg. 188
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Chamblee Townhomes Development Narrative
Chamblee Townhomes (official name to be determined) is a proposed Development of Parking for retail customers and residents is located behind the buildings to minimize the
Community Impact (DCI) of the property located at 5007 New Peachtree Road and 1100 impact of vehicular traffic along the retail facades and plazas. Electric charging stations
Vijay Drive. This 12.38 acre proposed redevelopment will displace the current industrial, and bike racks have been provided for environmentally friendly transportation alternatives.
automotive repair shop and nursery uses with 141 Townhome units, 8 multi-family units Vehicular and pedestrian access to the private Townhome community is located to the
and approximately 4,000 square feet of commercial space. The property is located in west of the commercial and multi-family hub via a boulevard-like entry drive flanked by
a transitioning area that remains predominantly residential. The immediately adjacent an Alley of strategically placed trees and sidewalks. Vehicular access is controlled by
properties have been improved with townhome developments, single family residences, classically styled entry gates to command a greater sense of arrival for the residents and
and GDOT office space. Bringing character and history to the site is its proximity to the their visitors. As you make your way into the Townhome community you are greeted at
existing railway line across New Peachtree Rd. The development plans respect the the terminus of the boulevard by the Clubhouse and Amenity core. With approximately
history and character of the surrounding community by incorporating architectural facades 4,300 sf, the Clubhouse includes top of the line amenities like shared workspaces, lounge-
and features that pay homage to its industrial past. style entertaining, intimate gathering areas, and a state of the art fitness center. Serving
as the community hub, the Clubhouse is centrally located to the community and pairs with
The proposed development is comprised of eight multi-family units above approximately the swimming pool and outdoor amenity area. With a resort style pool, outdoor kitchen,
4,000 square feet of mixed-use retail space fronting New Peachtree Road, and 141 fire pit, and shaded private pavilion and cabanas, residents and their guests will have their
private Townhomes. The street frontage retail spaces intend to serve the residents of the own private outdoor escape. The large passive lawn space completes the amenity core
development and the surrounding community by offering a variety of potential commercial and provides opportunities for recreational activities, community events, and on-leash dog
services. The amply sized pedestrian plaza creates a special gathering space for patrons walking.
and will offer such amenities as outdoor dining and seating, lush landscaping, and the
ability to activate the space during low light hours with overhead café-style lighting. Building upon the sense of community and environmental connectivity, the site plan has
The two bedroom, two bath, single story residences above the retail give residents the been designed in such a way as to foster community interaction and a true neighborhood
opportunity to be front and center to the commercial activity. The open kitchen plan feel. There are two townhome types proposed: front-loaded garage units, and rear-
provides gathering space around the island and provides free flowing connectivity to the loaded garage units. Street facing front-loaded garage townhome units boast over 2,100
entertaining area. With three exterior walls, these units have the unique opportunity to square feet of heated living space, with an open living area floor plan. The centrally
introduce natural light and fresh air through the various windows surrounding the unit. located kitchen creates two distinct entertaining areas while maintaining the open feel of
Pedestrian access to the retail and multi-family buildings is provided along New Peachtree the level, with plenty of windows facing both ends of the residence. The three bedrooms
Road via a 12’ wide promenade sidewalk that ties to the existing New Peachtree Road on the upper level provide a tranquil floor plan, with the master bedroom suite on one end
Trail system. Also incorporated into the development’s design is a proposed sidewalk and the two secondary bedrooms at the opposite end. The conveniently located laundry
connection from the adjacent neighborhood to the retail space and furthermore to New room is situated on the third floor. A bonus room on the ground floor, behind the two car
Peachtree Road. This will activate the surrounding Chamblee community, aligning with garage is suitable for virtually any function, from a work shop to a fourth bedroom and
the vision of the City. conveniently accessible from the garage and the living level above. This traditional three-
story layout orients vehicular access and pedestrian entry at the street façade.
GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22 1

Packet Pg. 189
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
The 1,800 square foot, three-story, rear-loaded garage units have vehicular access on the
rear façade of the townhome, while pedestrian access is faced toward a common green
space shared by multiple units. This residence also has an open living area floor plan.
By locating the kitchen to one end of the plan, a large entertaining space is generated,
allowing total flexibility with function and furniture arrangement. By implementing a
galley kitchen arrangement, the end wall is kept free of cabinetry, allowing for plenty of
views and lighting through the windows. The third level accommodates two generous
bedrooms, with private bathrooms, creating a master suite and a secondary bedroom
suite. The laundry room is also situated on the third floor for the residents’ convenience.
A third bedroom suite is provided on the ground floor, with direct access from the foyer.
This layout gives each resident and their visitors a unique opportunity to enjoy both
their front yard and the rear deck, activating spaces that may typically be under utilized.
Additional sidewalks and trails are interspersed throughout the community to enhance the
walkability of the site, providing convenient access to all amenities for the residents.
Connectivity to the New Peachtree Road Trail system to off site trailheads was also an
important consideration in the site planning efforts. From the front facing promenade
along New Peachtree Road, trail-goers, residents, and community members can
peacefully stroll through the retail hub and connect to the existing trail system east
of the property via a sidewalk between the retail parking area and the townhome
development. This semi-public space is separated from the private townhome community
with decorative metal fencing that will coordinate well with the architectural details and
facades. This trail connection really helps to emphasize the overall concept of community
camaraderie by allowing non-residents and residents to form shared experiences.
We believe this development proposal will enhance the quality of life for not only the
residents who call it home, but for the general public in the surrounding area. As our
neighbors have already begun to transition this once Industrial area into a thriving
residential community, we hope to expand that sense of pride through thoughtful planning
that aligns with the City’s vision for the future of the area.

Packet Pg. 190
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Variance And Waiver Review And Approval Criteria (2) The application of this UDO to the particular piece of property would create an
unnecessary hardship; and
This DCI application requests the following concurrent variances and waivers from the
The strict application of this UDO to the property will create an unnecessary hardship.
City of Chamblee Code of Ordinances:
The layout of the property would be significantly altered to achieve the 50% rear entry
1. Variance from Section 240-13(b)(1)(n) to allow 46.8% of the townhouse units to be requirement, such that the property would be drastically less marketable. The property
rear entry as opposed to the required 50% of all townhouse units. adjoins several single family neighborhoods that already challenges development from
2. Variance from Section 230-6(d) to allow retaining wall heights to exceed 12 feet at the a zoning standpoint. Parking spaces in front of the townhome units would be lost or
heights shown on the enclosed site plan. reduced to the extent that additional variances are required. The layout resulting from
3. Variance from Section 230-27(11) to allow the construction of the mixed use buildings the challenges with the adjacent single family neighborhoods along with the odd shape
along New Peachtree Road to not include roof surfaces with heat reflective material. and topography of the lot, presents the layout most achievable given the conditions.
4. Variance from Section 240-13(b)(1)(i) to allow the 200 square feet of private yard
(3) Such conditions are peculiar to the particular piece of property involved; and
space for each townhome unit to be located in a combination of the front and rear as
The conditions on this property are unique and peculiar to the property. The current
opposed to exclusively in either the front or rear yards.
zoning and use of the property notwithstanding, the adjacent single family uses
5. Variance from Section 240-13(b)(1)(r) to allow certain townhomes to not provide a
exacerbate the already unusual circumstances presented by the property itself. The
covered front porch that is less than 8 feet wide and 6 feet deep.
property is long and narrow with significant topographical changes. Frontage along
6. Variance from Section 230-26 to allow an 8 foot supplemental zone instead of the
New Peachtree Road is limited. The conditions applicable to the property create
required 10 foot supplemental zone to accommodate the installation of the New
significant hardship as it relates to redeveloping the site from its current use.
7. Variance from Section 230-26(a) to provide less than the required 5 foot landscape (4) Such conditions are not the result of any actions of the property owner; or
strip along the private drives internal to the development. The property shape, length, narrowness and topography are not the result of any
8. Waiver from Section 350-2(c) to not provide the required interparcel connection actions by the property owner. The adjacency to the single family neighborhoods is
between the subject property and the adjacent property. also not a condition created by the applicant or property owner.
Variance Criteria (5) Relief, if granted, would not cause substantial detriment to the public good nor
(1) There are extraordinary and exceptional conditions pertaining to the impair the purposes or intent of this zoning ordinance.
particular property in question because of its size, shape or topography; and The proposed development allows for a total redevelopment of the property that
The property is an unusually shaped lot with limited frontage on New Peachtree will bring it in alignment with the policies and goals of the comprehensive plan for
Road. The adjacency to single family zoning also imposes increased buffers the area. The relief requested is minimal as the intent of the UDO is largely met by
that limit the developable area. Additionally, due to the need to provide onsite providing 46.8% of all townhouses on the site as rear entry townhomes. The retaining
stormwater detention, the developable area of the site is further reduced which wall exceeds the maximum allowable height by the absolute minimum necessary to
results in the layout as proposed. The topography on the property further presents engineer the property safely. The construction of mixed use buildings that do not
exceptional conditions as it relates to the development of retaining wall height. include surfaces with heat reflective material does no harm to the public good. There
are various other features of the site such as significant open space to mitigate any

Packet Pg. 191
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
potential heat generated by roof materials. With respect to the 200 square feet (2) Proposal will not result in any detriment to the public good, including without
private yard requirement, each townhome unit contains more than the minimum limitation, detriment to the interest of the public and will not result in any
amount but not exclusively in either the front or rear yard. Regarding the front harm to the health, safety or general welfare of the City and its citizens; and
porch requirement, the units that will not meet this minimum contain porches on the The applicant is requesting a waiver to eliminate the need for the interparcel access
rear above the rear entry garages that exceed the minimum size. The requested stub out due to the conditions of the site that limit the buildable area as described
two foot reduction for the supplemental zone is necessary to accommodate the above. This project presents a significant improvement of the existing conditions on
installation of the New Peachtree Road Trail, which is 12 feet instead of 10 feet that the site and the surrounding community will benefit from the provision of the New
is typically required. For the private drive streetscape internal to the development, Peachtree Road Trail along the frontage, a completely redeveloped streetscape and
significant landscaping is being provided in lieu of the five foot landscaped strip. In the public amenities provided near the frontage at the mixed use buildings.
all, granting the relief proposed will not cause substantial detriment to the public
(3) Alternative streetscape or building/façade design configurations are provided
good nor impair the purposes or intent of this zoning ordinance as all requests
(where applicable).
are the minimum possible to afford relief. Granting these variances allow for
There are no alternative streetscape or building/façade design configurations that
the development of the property in accordance with the policies and goals of the
would allow the project to meet the interparcel requirement or the streetscape
character area.
requirements on the internal private drives. Any alteration to the streetscape design
Waiver Criteria would result in the request for even more waivers and/or variances. As designed, the
project meets the streetscape and building/façade design requirements despite the
(1) Features such as topography, high frequency transmission lines, existing
limitations presented by the conditions of the property.
trees or specimen or significant quality, underlying rock, or other
condition outside the owner’s control to the extent that strict adherence to
said requirements would be unreasonable and not consistent with the
purposes and goals of this code;
The property is a narrow, long and unusually shaped lot with significant
topographical changes that limits the redevelopment potential. To provide for
parking in the manner needed for the multifamily residential and commercial
buildings along the frontage of the development, there is no ability to provide the
interparcel access that is required. Further, the only place where the interparcel
access could be provided is located where there are significant topographical
challenges. Considering the challenges presented by the limited frontage along
New Peachtree Road and the other aforementioned conditions that limit the
buildable area of the site, it would be unreasonable and inconsistent with the goals
of the code to require strict adherence to the requirements of the UDO.

Packet Pg. 192
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Chamblee Zoning Zoning Map
N
Sh
al l
Ch a m
ow
285
Pk wy NW
Dr bro o k
for
a k
b l ee
NW O
d
d Rd
E
n
Rd
e
N
Du i
As
Fr
y
Hw
st
hf
nw
Be
Pi
or
rd
oody
NW
dD
rk l
L on
n Blvd
fo
so
141 Daw
e Rd N W
Bu
un w o
gv
Rd
i ew D r
o dy R d N E
Doraville
E
Dunwoody Park S
wn Sq
St
Be
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS THE

85
Dunwoo
ood
NS
o o dy R d N
Ln
Jo
Ol Hic
the
d yX
e to
dS ko r y Ln
Redw
or g ing
use
htree Rd
hallo
Ge
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP

p ri
sd
ng H o
aT
way Dr Ch
Chateau Clb
ico
rl
wfo
Ridge
Cir
hn
pe
eet
REFERRED TO IN THE Cotillion Dr n Fl e
rd R
N Peac
Va Dr
o
CHAMBLEE ZONING ORDINANCE
285
23
Beacon Dr
d
s
Savoy Dr
nF McAuliffe Dr
a nt on Ct
Brawley Cir MU-BC MU-BC

Mayor City Council
Adopted by the and on
err
Ln
285 Johnnys
nector
Cr
Bra Gate Cv
on
yR Chamblee
yal Ct
ston
C
Perim MU-BC ir
wl
Ro
Kin g
Qu
285
Pontiac Cir
rC W
ey
e ens W a y
Woodwin Ct
W Berk oo
d NE
f o rd Ct et C arv e
r
ay
RD
er Dr
d
y D
kS
er win
VC Park
Dunw
le
ar
ir Rd
Date
P Dr
aw
y Pa
dC er
NR-1 i m e te r
Av e ry Par
Stream Dr
Carver Ci r
or
ar v
Br
P
Regenc
y
rk Ct
oody T er
Chanc alle
kC
Tripl
ery L V
rkf
NC
t
n
MILL
eC
Walk alk
Be
w
Northwoods
y Park
Lo
GentrysW
enc
rs Rd
reek
Reg v ie
ng
w
Deacon Ln
Ct
Wa
Ct
Gainsb CC
Ji m
E Nancy Creek Dr ds
Cir
y
ay
e e D un
orou gh Dr
Fl owe
Mayor City Clerk
Nancy Creek Way
oo
Ave r
lW
a rk
W
Commodore Dr
a
y P
mir
331
Mill Val
t
rly
Mill C
NH
333
TILLY
334 335 Gentilly Pl
ve
Ad
336
te
Ga
Ga r r
Be
e Ct
Pk
ill
Ct
r Lake ey PUD
D
w
Eula Cir
Iv
eserv
NR-2 y e t t Cir
BLV
le
Dr
e
Pr
my
Ct
nd
W
ay de
Ca
Reg
ee
Gl a
Carver Dr
Sea N Glouc rter
ency
Po
entr
es
L
Spring Wa lk Ct
Clay Dr
IA
te
E
Cov t
rP
an
rkston Ct
Ash
e r Lk
ha
TR
US
eC
Dr
Ba VR
W Johnson Cir
Ci
Elm S t
C
D
r
Dyouv NR-1
EJ
Forrestal
IN
Ca
l
ill
Embry Hills
NR-1
nd
oh
Pa rs
mb l ee Tuck er Rd
ay
Wallace Dr E
CHAM B
Ca
e Trc e
W
Commod ore Ln
nso
RE
Se a m a n
Batt
141
rber V
on
HT
Ha
nC
al
Ct
lefo r d
l e y Dr
sD
ill e
C
ir
rt
M
Bo
Dyouv
McDaniel St
A
r
PE O
nnin
N Shal
Doral Dr
Ct
Dr low ford Rd T
e Dr
LEE
er
Caitlyn Ln
n
lle L O
Forrest Ct
uvi yn
g
Summer R o s
llw Turner St
to
D yo E
D
W Nancy Creek D r
n
Dor a
C
UNW
R
chester Trl NR-3
Win
t
lC
W in
C ir
Blvd
t
N PE
t
Afon d
C
Ln al
ion Fo
OODY RD
Pittsburg
or
dsor P at rd
LO
nt Dr D
N
Admiral Dr
k wy ACH
d
Pla sR
NG
D
er
y
Rd
l Wa
En
U
w
Rem ington
Ci r
Flo
M
TREE RD
sig
Lo
S
n
ng
IR
rest School Dr
Green Industria
ercy
Ca
T
Glen c
Dekalb 23
C
Ct
vi e
Gl a d n e y D
325
E
324
R
323 322
t
rlto
Colt Dr
As hf o
Dr
w
Wye Ln
r am
NW
I
rd
IT CC
ng e r
nD
L
r
Rd
A
Dr
g
G
AY
C
Gr anger t
Co
ptai n Dr
Ash
Peachtree
NR-2 John Glenn Dr
En
W
Gra
mm
C
t re e t
sig
ford
A re
Chamdun Pl
y
Chamdun Wa
sto
Peachtree Rd
Gre
Ash
IT
nD
Y
an
I n
H arts M ill Ln
Flowerland Dr
er
Trl
Ct Rd
fo rd K
Ca
Airport
r
d
en
es
Anastasia Ln Dr
Rd
Mo
Foresta
Sid
Watkins Pl
hil
Ct
Eva ns
n ls
nt
lD
n
ll Cre e k
rk L
Mercer
Pl
fo
Dr
r
Orleans
Sta
rd
t
Wyndale Ct h
lC
N
ur
Dr
Clyde Dr
De
M il
h
Mi C 285
ka
NC-2
University
Dr
Ashford Pt
lb
rt s
NR-1
Ce
ar
Ha
CC
H
Terrell Dr
Ashford Park
Ha
nt
RD
Hartford Gln all Dr Pa
ts Pl
rts
Lo v
ra
denh rk Je
Cl
Harts
Men
NC-1
ss
lA
M
e lan
EE
N
NR-2 Rd A
ea
o rman Way
ve
il l
dT Lawson Way
ve
TR
Spring St
Ct
rv
Runnymeade Pe
ac
ie
er
H
ht
w
Stewart Rd
AC
Ln
Av
ree
Dr Pl
IT
w
Teal Rd
PE
e
on
I
Bubb
nd
us
Cold Spring Ln
Clearv i ew
do
tria
C ir
lin NR-2
Rd
F ortingale Rd
W
Ct
lds
g
t
a
ll S
C
d
a
Sh
NE
na
Mend en h
am
re
mel R
ek
85
Do
Tally Dr Ste
ce v il l e H w y
stre
North Atlanta
D
P Rd NR-1 w art Ct
Clem
306
Irvindale Dr
307 308 309

V
310
od
C ar
311
ark
Ivy Ln
en
L
Wo
Henderson Park
son Dr
Br Buena Vista Ave

S Peachtree Rd
Cr
s
e k Ln oa I
wr
Vanet Rd
e
d
NR-3
D
Oakmont A v e
Rd
Ol d Norc r o s
Hamlin St
E
Pierce Dr
R
Brooksba
VC
Brookhaven La
nk
E
Wilton Ave
In
Pine St
ge
PUD
ay
D r
VC rso
R
A
Kristie Way
W
ll R
Da
Dr
n b u ry Parc Pl m
Rd
an
T
R D
Sandlewoo er
rth
Londo n d
an
Ashcroft Bnd
d Ln ica Dr
H
wo
Plaza Way
IT Bonnie Ave
ic
C
er
t
D
Y
sC
Ells
n Industrial
ER
F O
Am
Marlow Pl
HW
os
A
Ci r
TRE
nd Ave
ill R
Bla ela
CH P in
E
W
ir C VR NR-1 Poplar St
Strait St
Sexton Wo od
PEA
RD
lin
ir
S H A L L O W
Ga
m
B
Ha
FO
rc
Kim Ln
rookl
23
ia C
Way
ds Dr
Zoning Districts
BU
Keswick Dr
y
t
W
igh Wa
r
yD
e
Ln Hildo
oo
ns VC
Ho
W NR-3 Ha
ra
Durd ton lmar D

r
n Cir
spit
gi
ne Ct
v
sD
ar
en R
Wig
N Royal A t
d Pearl Ln
Ash
lle
r
A Airport
Au
Va
aly
al A
n CC A m
n
D
n Dr
Kesw i ck L lis
Hildon Rd
tu
air
Pearl La
l a nt a D
Blackburn Way
on n
Ma
ve
Keswi ck
Ln
view Dr
D
Catalina Dr
r
Cl
Mc D r
r de
lon
CC Corridor Commercial r
Cla
eD
ve
Du
D
Beverly Dr
r
r
Ct
301 Lam
CVC Corridor Village Commercial

300 299 VC 298 Lu Jan Dr 297 296
Co l q u itt D
be
Coronado Pl
th Cir
Stafford Pl Drury Ct
I Light Industrial
Dr
TOD VR
Hood Ave
141 VC Burk Ter

Wheeler Dr
IT
Tucker
d
Cumberlan
Mun day Dr
IT Industrial Transitional
IT
Pa Dr tec
Rd
M oun t a i n I ndustr i a l B l v d
k Park Chestn
Ann St
y t on R d N
G VR on Broo ut
W Az
Dowdell Dr dis
Watkin
Way
oods D
Mc
r
Ch
Ad
at
MU-BC Mixed Use - Business Center 13

Carroll Cir
Burk Dr
t
eb
An n C
est
F e ll o w s h
CC Dr
aw
E
ur
nd
y
mo
s Ave
Dr
ut
R ay
Cir
NC-1 Low-Density Neighborhood Commercial

Dr
CC CHAMBLEE TUCKER RD
Bagley Dr
Flightway Dr
RD Be
NC-2 Medium-Density Neighborhood Commercial

Century Ct
E E VC
laire Cir
TR
Clairwood Ter
Dr
CH d
NR-1 Neighborhood Residential 1

Corsair Dr
ne
A
g ate R
PE
La Venture Dr i
rla
Fa
Vijay Dr
Hard
29
ay Pl
Win
NR-2 Neighborhood Residential 2 85
d
eR
236
ee Ave
VR
Holid
htre
ac
t
tC
Pe
NR-3 Neighborhood Infill
277 Lawson Dr
NC-2
Flind
ew IT
ip
N VR 278 Ham Dr
279 280 I Ortega Wa
y 281 nolo
VC 4th St 282 g y Pkwy
h
NR-1
n
Tec
dL
PUD Planned Unit Development

lb
E
oo
re
Dyer Cir
ka
Pre sid ential Pkwy

Y
Me
t
r
Rd
tC
ow
De
Ci
HW
Me
5th St a do
TOD Transit-Oriented Development

w
ay
ice
Mu
Pa
co
CC
ad
ral
lW
kory Rd
rkridge Cres
Hic
As
Jan
Dr ay
Me
RD
y
Be 85
w D
Ca
Cora
8th St NR-1 I ve
ar
W
FO
rly
VC Village Commercial
6th St l
Hw
Ln
S tr
nfi
Hil lg
rr o
at
P
ls fa
BU
ford
Jefferson St
el
Cir
tum
t
ford
C
d a
Ha
Dr Tr
d
ce
ll R Arm
Dr
Sam a
Jani
we
an
VR Village Residential
s Dr
llow
ld
Knox Ave
Eaton Pl
Aviation Way
Ca NC-1
Qu
Sha
SH A LL OW VR
e n Dr
Ln
e
F OR D TE
Tem
Runway Protection Zones (Location approximate, based upon CAD data) CC R CC

r
ye
Wo
pl e
wo o ill
od D r Airport Rd I
e
re
Park Ln
dg
ev
CC
mm
Rd
Dr
S
t r ea l Rd
Dr
Rail Trail Overlay

Woodcock Blvd
n
de
Cy
Ka
Dr
sta
Ringle Rd
Briarcliff 5 NR-1
h t r e e Cr e e k
c
Surrey Ln
Ct
Appling Way
es
9th St A
nt
top
Smoke Rise
aE
ls
Hil
I-8
Dr
d Rd
h
en
g
ia
rin
Vill
Appling Cir
Hill
Parkridge Dr
pe
W his
Dr
5
Appling Dr

Wa
NR-2
r
tt
Country Club
r
Wood si d
e
Dr ills
D
aw
ir
N
1:72,224
C
ela H
ke
271 270
n
272 m g
19 PM
Marli
Pa in 268 267
er
Dr
rui
Redding
Cir p
Cravenridge Dr
Dr his
nd
Alc
D
oo
W
w
o
la
dH
e Rd
Packet Pg. 193
a
Creek
oc
W a y Arro
Sky
Ct
0 0.5 1 w 2 mi
ey Rd
Tob
dywin
Tryon Rd
y
on
r
Rd
Dresden
xp
i
Marlin Wa y
D E
Arrow
Sq
lin t Bran Br
as
e
uare D
Ter W Hardee Ave n ar e
l
an sde rth
Ge orgi M
No
r
n Dr W
DR
Dre
lls
rE
n Dr
CC N CC
nD
Crosswa
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Existing Conditions Plan
EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES:
1. EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM A SURVEY
FILE PROVIDED BY VALENTINO & ASSSOCIATES, INC. DATED
12/31/2022.
2. UTILITIES MAY EXIST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
ALL UTILITY COMPANIES HAVING UTILITIES WITHIN OR
ADJACENT TO THE WORK AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
HAVE THE UTILITIES FIELD LOCATED AND COORDINATE WITH
THE UTILITY COMPANIES TO HAVE CONFLICTS RELOCATED
WHEN NECESSARY OR ADAPTED FOR TIE-INS.
3. WHERE EXISTING RUNOFF LEAVES THE SITE IN A SHEET FLOW

CONDITION, RUNOFF SHALL LEAVE THE SITE IN A SHEET FLOW
CONDITION AFTER DEVELOPMENT.
PREPARED BY
ACQUISITIONS, LLC.
1449 WEST PALMETTO PARK ROAD, SUITE 415
GROVER CORLEW
E
BOCA RATON, FL 33486

PHONE: 000.000.0000
C
E
X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X
X X
E E E E E E
E
E
E
PREPARED FOR
X
G
X
X
X
X
X
X
E
X
E
BY
E
E
E
DATE
X
E
X
E
E
X
E
E
E
X
E
G
G
G
X
No. ISSUANCE AND REVISION DESCRIPTIONS

X
W
E X
AL
E E
L
E
W
G
E
UT
G
X
G
G
E
X
X
X
G
G
G
G G
X
Drawing name: K:\amt_civil\014765000_chamblee townhome\CAD\plansheets\DCI\2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN.dwg 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS Apr 11, 2022 11:06am by: Daniel.Kerr
G G G X
G
W
X
E
X
UT
X
E
G
EX G
X
G E X G EX
E
G
X X X
G
E
G
E
19
E
X
T
E
G
E
E UT
W
X
UT
X
D
E
UT
E
X
X
X
B
G
X
T
E
E
G
X
X
UT
UT
E
PROJECT STREET ADDRESS, PROJECT CITY STATE ZIP

E
16
UT
X
X
X
X
G
E
VIJAY DRIVE
LAND LOT XXX, __ND DISTRICT
UT
X
UT
PARCEL ID: XXX-XX-XXXXX

W
X
X
UT
GG
G
G
X
X
G
A
GE
G G G G G G
X X X X X X X G
X
X X X
X X
X X X X X
E
E
PROJECT
E
E
GSWCC NO.
(LEVEL II) 0000077807
DRAWN BY
MCP
E
DESIGNED BY
MCP
REVIEWED BY
IDK
DATE
03/31/2022
NORTH
PROJECT NO.
014765000
E
TITLE
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
PLAN
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60 120 SHEET NUMBER
2.0
This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Packet Pg. 194
7
Master Site Plan
Chamblee Townhomes
3.C.2.b
Packet Pg. 195
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Floodplain Phasing Plan
POTENTIAL COMPENSATORY STORAGE
EXPANSION AREA 1 ~ 27,000 SF
POTENTIAL COMPENSATORY STORAGE
EXPANSION AREA 2 ~ 18,000 SF
FLOODPLAIN
PHASING
PLAN
3.1

Packet Pg. 196
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Grading Plan
GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES:
1. SITE AREA: 12.38 ACRES
DISTURBED AREA: 12.48 ACRES
2. CRITICAL SPOT GRADES ARE TO PAVEMENT GRADE UNLESS

OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL SIDEWALKS AND

CROSSWALKS WITH A 2.0% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE AND A 5.0%
MAXIMUM RUNNING SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED AS A RAMP. GRADES
WITHIN ADA HANDICAP PARKING AREAS NOT TO EXCEED A 2%
MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION.
4. ALL ROOF DRAIN PIPING SHALL BE PVC UNLESS OTHERWISE

NOTED.
PREPARED BY
5. ALL ROOF DRAIN CLEANOUTS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL HAVE A
BRASS CAP SET FLUSH WITH THE PROPOSED GRADE.
6. ALL PIPE LENGTHS SPECIFIED IN THESE PLANS ARE THE

HORIZONTAL DISTANCE AND ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE
ACQUISITIONS, LLC.
ONLY. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO

GROVER CORLEW
DETERMINE ACTUAL LENGTHS BASED ON PROPOSED PIPE
SLOPE. PIPE LENGTHS IN PLANS ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER
OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.

PHONE: 000.000.0000
7. THIS PROJECT DOES/DOES NOT LIE WITHIN A 100 YEAR FLOOD
HAZARD ZONE AS DEFINED BY THE F.E.M.A. "FLOOD HAZARD
E
BOUNDARY MAP" COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 00000X0000X,
DATED 00/00/0000.

PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ALL UTILITY COMPANIES HAVING UTILITIES WITHIN OR ADJACENT
E
TO THE WORK AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE
UTILITIES FIELD LOCATED AND COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY
COMPANIES TO HAVE CONFLICTS RELOCATED WHEN
998.69 995.64 1005.35 65
998.42 1002.58
64 NECESSARY OR ADAPTED FOR TIE-INS.
PREPARED FOR
1007.02
1009.61 1012.18 1015.23 1019.89
61 42" RCP
E
9. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING INVERT FOR SANITARY
SS
1020
SS
1-W
SEWER AND STORM DRAINAGE SERVICE CONNECTIONS PRIOR
M
FFE: 1011.75 FFE: 1019.00
G
FFE: 1014.25 FFE: 1016.25 36
M
42" RCP TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER OF

DISCREPANCY PRIOR TO PROCEEDING.
18" PVC
X
1-W
BY
M
1009 41
SS
18" PVC
SS
FFE: 1010.00
E
42" RCP FFE: 1021.00 10.NO GRADED SLOPE SHALL EXCEED 2H:1V
67
E
1-W
M
DATE
66
M
M
M
M
M
W W W W W W W W W
42 40 39 38 11. ALL WALLS GREATER THAN 30" IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED
E
E
1019
1018
W
1017
1016
1015
1014
1013
1012
1
101
G
AND PERMITTED BY AN ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF
101
1-W
PROPOSED 1-W
18" PVC 18" PVC 18" PVC 18" PVC
M
SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
0
SS
SS
SS
RETAINING GEORGIA.
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
M
M
WALL
E
56 08
SS
SS
42" RCP
SS
1009 12. ALL WALLS GREATER THAN 30" IN HEIGHT SHALL HAVE FALL
E
X
1-W
W
1-W
18" PVC PROTECTION THROUGH FENCING OR HANDRAIL AT A MINIMUM
M M
E
W

OF 42" TALL. REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAILS.
18" PVC
18" PVC
FFE: 1011.00
1-W M
FFE: 1014.75 FFE: 1016.75 FFE: 1019.00
G
1-W
M M
W
E
13. THE INFILTRATION FOR THE STORMWATER SYSTEM IS BASED ON
SS
68 1034
SS
27
SS
07
1-W
06
M
FFE: 1010.00 FFE: 1011.25 58 19 IN-SITU TESTING BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE SYSTEM IS
W
18" PVC
1-W
28
M M
18" PVC 1035 BASED ON OBTAINING INFILTRATION RATES SIMILAR TO THE
E
57
UT
1-W
FFE: 1021.00
M
42" RCP TESTED VALUES PRE-CONSTRUCTION. AS SUCH, THE AREAS
SS
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
18" P
W
1-W
45 UNDERGROUND DETENTION 103
6 WHERE STORMWATER IS DIRECTED TO INFILTRATE ARE TO
M M
18" PVC
X
CP
1-W
43
24
M
1010
16 ROWS, 90 LF OF 60" PERFORATED REMAIN RESIDUAL SOILS AND COMPACTION IS TO BE LIMITED TO

"R
SS
"P
VC
1011
24" PVC
M
G
30 HDPE WRAPPED IN STONE 7
42
103 ENSURE THE SOIL CHARACTERISTICS CONTINUE TO FUNCTION

VC
01
1012
1010.03 26 25
M
11
INVERT: 1001.50
1013
1037
W
1007.00 42" RCP 05 AS TESTED PRE-CONSTRUCTION. IF THESE AREAS ARE
SS
SS
18" PVC
1014
962.00 STORAGE: 73,500 CF 8
SS
967.83 29 103
1015
60
M
W
DISTURBED, COMPACTED, OR FILLED, THE ENGINEER IS TO BE
VC
E
46
1016
10 04 03 02
UT
18" P
1017
FFE: 1011.75 24" PVC 18" PVC 1038 9 NOTIFIED AS ADDITIONAL TESTING AND COORDINATION WOULD
103
1018
42" RCP
1019 18" PVC 18" PVC

36 BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE THE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED
7
35
1031
1034
18" PVC
W W W W W W W
1032
1033
1-W
1030
1029
1020
M
1027
1028
103
1026
1021
1024
1025
10
1022
1023
M
24 18" PVC 10 0
X
22 1039 104 INFILTRATION RATES CAN BE ACHIEVED.

W
44
SS
12" HDPE
SS
SS
8
103
18" PVC
G
1040
1-W
34 35
M
23 21 20 12" HDPE 1
M
FFE: 1011.75 104

Drawing name: K:\amt_civil\014765000_chamblee townhome\CAD\plansheets\DCI\4.0 GRADING PLAN.dwg 4.0 GRADING PLAN Apr 11, 2022 11:08am by: Daniel.Kerr
31 24" PVC 1
49 48 47 18" PVC 104
E UT
W
SS
1-W M
SS
1042
W
M
18" PVC
UT
1042
M
18" PVC 18" PVC
W
13
FFE: 1015.25 FFE: 1017.25 FFE: 1019.50
GRADING LEGEND:
FFE: 1037.00
1039
M
1043
1-W
1043
M
55
M
1027
SS
UT
M
SS
18" PVC
18" PVC
18"
59
1040
FFE: 1044 1044 1044
1-W M
30"
M
W
M
955
G
PV 54 950 EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
M

C
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
952.00 16 1045
1028
18" PVC
12" HDPE
1029 12" HDPE

1045
E
1041
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
12 EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR

M
17 948
M
962.00
M
M
X
SS SS SS SS SS SS
09 14
M SS
53 52 51 50
SS
962.00
UT
M
UT
W
FFE: 1031.00 W W W
W
1019
1018
FFE: 1035.50
1017
W
1016
15
1015
1014
1013
1046
1012
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR

M
GAR: 1021.00 1046 945
1035
1036
SS
18" W
PVC 18" PVC W 18" PVC
M SS
SS
FFE: 1011.75 W W W W W
1042
SS
E
DP
M
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
UT
1-W
1-W
1-W
12" HDPE H
M
M
12" HDPE PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR

M
12" 944
960
47
VIJAY DRIVE
SS
10
M
18" PVC
W
1043
SS
1047 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE

M

SS
18" PVC
G
1030
M
E
1020 PROPOSED TOP GRADE AT WALL
M
FFE: 1046 TG:945.00
1044
M
M
UT
X
UT
FFE: 1019.50
W
FFE: 1014.75 FFE: 1017.00
1031
33 32 18 FFE: 1037.00 BG:945.00 PROPOSED BOTTOM GRADE AT WALL
M
M
45
37
M
SS
10
PROPOSED TOP OF STAIR GRADE
SS
SS
UT
SS
1010.02 1013.29 1015.97 1020.09
964.21 986.71 1006.85 1017.37 1039.09 1041.57 1045.60
1003.44 1028.53 E PROPOSED BOTTOM OF STAIR GRADE
SS
1033.76 1038.79
GE
X X X X X X
HP:945.00 PROPOSED HIGH POINT GRADE
10 10 1 1 1
101 101 20 1021 23 025026 027 30 PROPOSED LOW POINT GRADE
1040
1042
31
1041
1043
1039
1035
1036
1037
1038
1034
1044
1045
1033
1046
1047
10
9
1028
10
32
E
10
10
7 8 10
10
102
E
16
19
22
24
10
DRY EXTENDED DETENTION POND PROPOSED TOP OF CURB GRADE
DEPTH: 10 FT
STORAGE: 116,250 CF PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED BOTTOM OF CURB GRADE
SS
E
DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW
PROJECT
E
E
GSWCC NO.
E
(LEVEL II) 0000077807
DRAWN BY
MCP
DESIGNED BY
MCP
REVIEWED BY
IDK
E
DATE
03/31/2022
PROJECT NO.
014765000
NORTH TITLE
GRADING PLAN
4.0

Packet Pg. 197
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Lot Layout Plan
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY:
SITE SUMMARY:
CURRENT ZONING: IT
PROPOSED ZONING: VR - VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL
SITE AREA: 12.38 ACRES

TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: 12.48 ACRES
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 7.90 ACRES (63.8%)
BUILDING SETBACK:
FRONT: 10 FT
SIDE: 7.5 FT
BACK: 15 FT
PREPARED BY
LANDSCAPE SETBACK:
FRONT: 10 FT
SIDE: 5 FT
BACK: 20 FT
STREETSCAPE SETBACK (NEW PEACHTREE STREET)
ACQUISITIONS, LLC.
LANDSCAPE: 5 FT

GROVER CORLEW
SIDEWALK: 12 FT
SUPPLEMENTAL: 8 FT
FAR CALCULATIONS:

PHONE: 000.000.0000
MAX FAR ALLOWED: 2.0 * NLA = 1,078,122 SF
FAR PROVIDED:
RESIDENTIAL
TOTAL FAR PROVIDED: 295,000 SF (0.55 * NLA)
OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS:
MINIMUM USOR REQUIRED: 0.1 * NLA = 53,927 SF

7.5-FT BUILDING
SIDE SETBACK PROVIDED: 80,890 SF (0.15* NLA)
PREPARED FOR
PROPOSED LAND USES & DENSITIES:
SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOME 141 UNITS
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
RETAIL/RESTAURANT 4,000 SF
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
2-STORY RESIDENTIAL 8 UNITS
24.0'
24.0'
BY
67.0' 67.0'
PARKING SUMMARY:
24.0'
24.0'
67.0' 67.0' REQUIRED PARKING: 276 SPACES (TOTAL)
DATE
MULTIFAMILY TOWNHOME (141 UNITS) 224 SPACES (1.5/UNIT)
24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0'
24.0'
24.0'
RETAIL/RESTAURANT (4,000 SF) 40 SPACES (1.0/100 SF)
67.0' 67.0' 2-STORY RESIDENTIAL (8 UNITS) 12 SPACES (1.5/UNIT)
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
24.0'
24.0'
BICYCLE PARKING 16 SPACES
67.0' 67.0'
REQUIRED SHARED PARKING 39 SPACES (TOTAL)
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'

(MAX 25% REDUCTION FOR EACH
20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0'
24.0'
24.0'
80.0' USE ALLOWED)
67.0' 2-STORY RESIDENTIAL (12 UNITS) 9 SPACES (MAX 25% REDUCTION)
67.0'
80.0' RETAIL/RESTAURANT (4,000 SF) 30 SPACES (MAX 25% REDUCTION
24.0'
24.0'
67.0'
67.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 80.0' PROPOSED PARKING: 322 SPACES (TOTAL)
24.0'
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 282 SPACES (2.0/UNIT)
24.0'
20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 67.0'
UT
80.0' GARAGE 282 SPACES (2.0/UNIT)
67.0'
SHARED PARKING 40 SPACES
24.0'
COMPACT SPACES 32 SPACES
24.0'
80.0' 67.0'
24.0'
67.0' BICYCLE PARKING 16 SPACES

67.0'
24.0'
67.0'
24.0'
Drawing name: K:\amt_civil\014765000_chamblee townhome\CAD\plansheets\DCI\3.0 MASTER SITE PLAN.dwg 4.0 LOT LAYOUT PLAN Apr 11, 2022 11:09am by: Daniel.Kerr
67.0'
SITE NOTES:
UT
20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0'
24.0'
80.0'
67.0'
1. THE PROPOSED BUILDING INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
FROM AN ELECTRONIC FILE PROVIDED BY NILES BOLTON
24.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
80.0'
67.0' ASSOCIATES, DATED 03/21/2022 AND IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE
80.0' 80.0' 80.0' 80.0' 80.0' 80.0' 80.0' 80.0'

80.0' 80.0' 80.0' 80.0' 80.0' 80.0' 80.0' 80.0'
80.0' PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE
UT
20.0' 20.0'
ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING INFORMATION.
24.0'
80.0'
UT

67.0' 20.0' 20.0'
80.0' FILE PROVIDED BY VALENTINO & ASSSOCIATES, INC., DATED
24.0'
20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0'
67.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 20.0' 12/31/2022.
ROAD D
UT
24.0'
20-FT BUILDING 20.0' 20.0'

(24' PRIVATE ROAD) 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB
VIJAY DRIVE
REAR SETBACK

67.0' (MIN 40' ACCESS & UTILITY ESMT)
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

20.0' 20.0'
UT
24.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0' 4. SIDEWALK INSTALLED AGAINST BACK OF CURB SHALL BE
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
67.0'
20.0' 20.0'
INSTALLED PER THE PLAN AS MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF
24.0'
67.0' CURB.
20.0' 20.0'
UT
24.0'
5. ALL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING MUST MEET THE LATEST

67.0' 20.0' 20.0'
REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH BY MUTCD, GDOT, AND GEORGIA
UT
24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0'
24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' STATE CODE.
6. REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ALL HARDSCAPE AND

LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
7.5-FT BUILDING 10-FT BUILDING
SIDE SETBACK FRONT SETBACK
30-FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER

(ADJACENT TO SINGLE FAMILY)
PROJECT
GSWCC NO.
(LEVEL II) 0000077807
DRAWN BY
MCP
DESIGNED BY
MCP
REVIEWED BY
IDK
DATE
03/31/2022
NORTH
PROJECT NO.
014765000
TITLE
LOT LAYOUT
PLAN
5.0

Packet Pg. 198
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Utility Plan
UTILITY NOTES:
1. ALL SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUTS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL HAVE
A BRASS CAP SET FLUSH WITH THE PROPOSED GRADE.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE UTILITY CONNECTION AND

REROUTING LOCATIONS WITH APPLICABLE AGENCIES.
3. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH

CITY OF CHAMBLEE SEWER AUTHORITY SANITARY SEWER AND
CITY OF CHAMBLEE WATER AUTHORITY WATER STANDARDS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
4. ALL PIPE LENGTHS SPECIFIED IN THESE PLANS ARE THE

HORIZONTAL DISTANCE AND ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE
ONLY. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO
DETERMINE ACTUAL LENGTHS BASED ON PROPOSED PIPE
PREPARED BY
SLOPE. PIPE LENGTHS IN PLANS ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER
OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
ACQUISITIONS, LLC.

GROVER CORLEW
ALL UTILITY COMPANIES HAVING UTILITIES WITHIN OR ADJACENT
TO THE WORK AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE
UTILITIES FIELD LOCATED AND COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY
COMPANIES TO HAVE CONFLICTS RELOCATED WHEN
NECESSARY OR ADAPTED FOR TIE-INS.

PHONE: 000.000.0000
6. ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS END AT 5' OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING
FOOTPRINT. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL,
ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING PLANS FOR BUILDING LAYOUT AND
E
INTERNAL UTILITY SERVICE.
7. ALL ONSITE UTILITIES SHALL BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND.
8. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING INVERT FOR SANITARY

SEWER SERVICE CONNECTIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
E
1" DOMESTIC METER TRAFFIC-RATED SANITARY PROPOSED 8" DIP MAIN CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCY PRIOR
IN TRAFFIC RATED VAULT SEWER CLEANOUT WATER LINE
(TYP. ALL UNITS) (TYP. OF EACH)
TO PROCEEDING.
PREPARED FOR
B5.1 A14.1
E
SS
UTILITY LEGEND:
SS
1-W
M
83 LF OF 8" DI
BY
M
85 LF OF 8" DI
71 LF OF 8" DI
X
1-W
W PROPOSED WATER LINE
M
DATE
SS
SS
B5 E
165 LF OF 8" DI UGP PROPOSED ELECTRIC LINE
E
B7 1-W
M
A14
PROPOSED TELEPHONE LINE
M
M
M
M
M
UGT
W W W W W W W W W
E
E
B4 490 LF OF 8" DI
G
PROPOSED NATURAL GAS LINE
1-W
21 LF OF 8" DI 1-W
M
SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS G
SS
SS
SS
M
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
M
M
E SS PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPE
SS
SS

SS
16 LF OF 8" DI PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
E
X
1-W
W
1-W
M M
139 LF OF 8" DI
E
EXISTING A5.1.1
W
EXISTING 8" WATER LINE SS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

B6
B9
1-W M
SANITARY SEWER GREASE TRAP
G
1-W
M M
W
E
SS
SS
WATER VALVE
SS
36 LF OF 8" DI
1-W
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
M
W
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC)
1-W
M M
101 LF OF 8" DI
E
UT
1-W M
EXISTING B8 EXISTING82 LF OF 8" DI
SS
FIRE HYDRANT
W
1-W
PROPOSED 8" X 8" WATER TAP
M M
X
1-W
POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV)

M
SS
G
B5.1.1 272 LF OF 8" DI A13
WATER MAIN TAPPING SLEEVE
M
GREEN SPACE
W
POOL
SS
SS
CLUBHOUSE EXISTING A5
SS
130 LF OF 8" DI WATER CONNECTIONS AND BENDS
M
W
E
UT
A4
W W W W W W W
M 1-W M
B1
X
SS SS
SS
G
1-W M
M
Drawing name: K:\amt_civil\014765000_chamblee townhome\CAD\plansheets\DCI\6.0 UTILITY PLAN.dwg 6.0 UTILITY PLAN Apr 11, 2022 11:09am by: Daniel.Kerr
108 LF OF 8" DI
E
W
SS
1-W M
SS
W
M
UT
M
67 LF OF 8" DI
W
M
1-W M
M
SS
ABOVE GROUND
UT
M
SS

490 LF OF 8" DI
DETENTION POND
RETAIL
1-W M
M
W
B2
G
M
B3
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
E
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
A3
M
M
M
A2
X
M SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
SS
UT
M
W
W W W
W
W EXISTING261 LF OF 8" DI
M
VIJAY DRIVE
M SS SS SS
W W W W W W W
SS
M

1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
UT
M
M
M
M
81 LF OF 8" DI 74 LF OF 8" DI
SS
M
73 LF OF 8" DI
W
220 LF OF 8" DI
SS
M
SS
G
M
E
RETAIL
M
M
M
85 LF OF 8" DI
UT
X
B3.1 A1
W
M
A3.1
M
M
SS
SS
SS
UT
SS
B2.1 E
SS
GE
X X X X X X
E
E
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

SS
EXISTING 10' WIDE SANITARY
E
SEWER EASEMENT
PROJECT
EXISTING A5.1
E
GSWCC NO.
(LEVEL II) 0000077807
DRAWN BY
MCP
DESIGNED BY
MCP
REVIEWED BY
IDK
DATE
03/31/2022
PROJECT NO.
014765000
NORTH
TITLE
UTILITY PLAN
6.0

Packet Pg. 199
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Preliminary Plat
SITE SUMMARY:
CURRENT ZONING: IT

TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 7.90 ACRES (63.8%)
BUILDING SETBACK:
FRONT: 10 FT
SIDE: 7.5 FT
BACK: 15 FT
PREPARED BY
LANDSCAPE SETBACK:
FRONT: 10 FT
SIDE: 5 FT
BACK: 20 FT
STREETSCAPE SETBACK (NEW PEACHTREE STREET)
ACQUISITIONS, LLC.
LANDSCAPE: 5 FT

GROVER CORLEW
SIDEWALK: 12 FT
SUPPLEMENTAL: 8 FT
FAR CALCULATIONS:

PHONE: 000.000.0000
E
FAR PROVIDED:
RESIDENTIAL
E
PROPERTY LINE
TYPICAL 24' X 38' TOWNHOME 7.5-FT BUILDING PROPOSED FIRE MINIMUM USOR REQUIRED: 0.1 * NLA = 53,927 SF
FRONT ENTRY ONLY SIDE SETBACK HYDRANT
PROVIDED: 80,890 SF (0.15* NLA)
PREPARED FOR
7.5'
PROPOSED LAND USES & DENSITIES:
E
SS
SS
1-W
M
SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOME 141 UNITS
M
38.0'
2-STORY RESIDENTIAL 8 UNITS
X
1-W
BY
M
(MIN 40' ACCESS & UTILITY
SS
SS
PARKING SUMMARY:
E
E
(24' PRIVATE ROAD)
REQUIRED PARKING: 276 SPACES (TOTAL)

1-W
M
DATE
M
M
M
M
M
W W W W W W W W W
ROAD C MULTIFAMILY TOWNHOME (141 UNITS) 224 SPACES (1.5/UNIT)
E
ROAD 4
W
(24' PRIVATE ROAD)
5.0' 24.0' RETAIL/RESTAURANT (4,000 SF) 40 SPACES (1.0/100 SF)
1-W
1-W (MIN 40' ACCESS & UTILITY ESMT)

M
2-STORY RESIDENTIAL (8 UNITS) 12 SPACES (1.5/UNIT)

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
(TYP.)
SS
SS
SS
M
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
M
M
E
PROPOSED FIRE BICYCLE PARKING 16 SPACES
SS
SS
ESMT)
HYDRANT
(MIN 40' ACCESS & UTILITY ESMT)

SS
E
X
1-W
W

1-W
M M
E
W
NEIGHBORHOOD

(24' PRIVATE ROAD)
1-W M PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TIE INTO EXISTING CURB (MAX 25% REDUCTION FOR EACH
1-W USE ALLOWED)
ROAD 2
PROPOSED 24 FT WIDE DRIVE
M M
W
E
2-STORY RESIDENTIAL (12 UNITS) 9 SPACES (MAX 25% REDUCTION)
SS
5-FT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 5-FT LANDSCAPE ZONE

SS
APRON AND VEHICULAR
SS
1-W M
ACCESS POINT RETAIL/RESTAURANT (4,000 SF) 30 SPACES (MAX 25% REDUCTION

1-W
M M
E
PROPOSED SECURITY PROPOSED 12-FT CONCRETE
1-W
PROPOSED PARKING: 322 SPACES (TOTAL)

M
MAIL KIOSK CHECK-IN ENTRY
SS
SIDEWALK
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 282 SPACES (2.0/UNIT)
W
1-W
M M
8-FT SUPPLEMENTAL ZONE

X
1-W
TYPICAL 20' X 41' TOWNHOME GARAGE 282 SPACES (2.0/UNIT)
M
12.0'
PROPOSED SECURITY ENTRY

SS
REAR ENTRY EXISTING POWER POLE SHARED PARKING 40 SPACES

M
M GATE WITH KNOX BOX WITH TYPE 'CH' LIGHT COMPACT SPACES 32 SPACES
GREEN SPACE
(24' PRIVATE ROAD)
W
POOL
SS
SS
CLUBHOUSE BICYCLE PARKING 16 SPACES
SS
M
E
ROAD 3
ENTRY SIGNAGE
ROAD A
Drawing name: K:\amt_civil\014765000_chamblee townhome\CAD\plansheets\DCI\7.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT.dwg 7.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT Apr 11, 2022 11:11am by: Daniel.Kerr
1-W
LOCATION W W W W 38.0' W W W
SITE NOTES:
M
(24' PRIVATE ROAD)

M

X
SS SS
SS
1-W M
M
5.0'
(TYP.) 1. THE PROPOSED BUILDING INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS
E UT
W
20.0'
SS
1-W M
SS
FROM AN ELECTRONIC FILE PROVIDED BY NILES BOLTON

M
3.0'
W
M
20.0' ASSOCIATES, DATED 03/21/2022 AND IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE
1-W
PROPOSED FIRE
M
PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE

M
SS
ABOVE GROUND
M
SS
HYDRANT
DETENTION POND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING INFORMATION.
RETAIL
1-W
(24' PRIVATE ROAD)

M
M
W

1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
ROAD 1
E
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
FILE PROVIDED BY VALENTINO & ASSSOCIATES, INC., DATED
M
M
M
X
SS SS SS SS SS SS
25.0'
SS
M SS
ROAD D
M
UT
16.0' W W W
W
ROAD B
W
(TYP.) (24' PRIVATE ROAD) 24.0' 12/31/2022.

M
(TYP.) (MIN 40' ACCESS & UTILITY ESMT)

M SS
(24' PRIVATE ROAD)
24.0'
SS SS
20-FT BUILDING W W W W W W W (MIN 40' ACCESS & UTILITY ESMT)
SS
M
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
1-W
REAR SETBACK
M
M
M
3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB
VIJAY DRIVE
SS
M
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
W
SS

SS
W
M
E
RETAIL
M
4. SIDEWALK INSTALLED AGAINST BACK OF CURB SHALL BE

M
M
X
UT
M
M
10.0' INSTALLED PER THE PLAN AS MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF
M
CURB.
SS
SS
SS
SS
10' SANITARY
30.0' E
SS
SEWER EASEMENT REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH BY MUTCD, GDOT, AND GEORGIA
E
PROPOSED FIRE PROPOSED SHARED PARKING
PROPOSED FIRE REAR TOWNHOME ENTRY PROPOSED FIRE
X X X X X X STATE CODE.
HYDRANT HYDRANT
(TYP.) HYDRANT PROPOSED 2-STORY
PROPOSED TRASH LOCATION
E
E
RESIDENTIAL ABOVE RETAIL 6. REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ALL HARDSCAPE AND
(TYP.) LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
EXISTING POWER POLE WITH
30-FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER TYPE 'CH' LIGHT PROPOSED PLAZA
SS
PROPOSED ADA (ADJACENT TO SINGLE FAMILY)
E
RAMP
10.0-FT BUILDING FRONT
SETBACK
SITE PLAN LEGEND:
PROJECT
TYPE 'CH' LIGHT
PROPERTY LINE
E
BUILDING SETBACK LINE

TIE INTO EXISTING CURB
STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
E
VEHICULAR RATED CONCRETE PAVEMENT
STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT

GSWCC NO.
E
(LEVEL II) 0000077807
STANDARD STAMPED CONCRETE
DRAWN BY
PAVERS MCP
DESIGNED BY
MCP
PARKING COUNT
REVIEWED BY
IDK
E
DATE
03/31/2022
PROJECT NO.
014765000
NORTH
TITLE
PRELIMINARY
PLAT
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SHEET NUMBER
7.0
0 30 60 120

Packet Pg. 200
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Hydro Basin Map
PREPARED BY
BASIN A - OFF-SITE TO DETENTION
ACQUISITIONS, LLC.
CN = 85

GROVER CORLEW
AREA = 5.76 AC.
Tc = 5.0 MIN.

PHONE: 000.000.0000
E
PREPARED FOR
X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X
X X
E E E E E E
E
E
E
BY
X
X
X
X
X
DATE
X
E
X
E
E
E
E
E
ROUTED - OFF-SITE TO DETENTION
X
E
CN = 92

E
AREA = 2.13 AC.
E
X
E
E
Tc = 5.0 MIN.
X
E
G
G
X
E
X
W
E X
AL
E E
L
E
G
E
G
X
G
G
E
X
X
X
G
BASIN A - ON-SITE TO DETENTION
G
G G
CN = 87
X
G G G X
G X
E
X
Drawing name: K:\amt_civil\014765000_chamblee townhome\CAD\plansheets\DCI\8.0 HYDRO BASE MAP.dwg 8.0 HYDRO BASE MAP Apr 11, 2022 11:11am by: Daniel.Kerr
AREA = 10.39 AC.

X
Tc = 5.0 MIN.
E
G
E X G
X
G E X G E X
E
G
X X X
G
E
E
E
X
T
E
G
E
E UT
X
X
X
E

X
X
POA BASIN A
X
X
E
G
X
X
UT
E
VIJAY DRIVE
E

X
X
X
X
BASIN B - ON-SITE BYPASS
CN = 67
E
AREA = 1.93 AC.
X
UT
X Tc = 5.0 MIN.
X
G
G
G
X
G
G
X
G
E
G G G G G G
E
X X X X X X X G
X
X X X
X X
X X X X X
E
E
BASIN A - OFF-SITE TO DETENTION
E
CN = 70
PROJECT
AREA = 1.42 AC.
Tc = 5.0 MIN.
E
GSWCC NO.
(LEVEL II) 0000077807
DRAWN BY
MCP
DESIGNED BY
MCP
REVIEWED BY
IDK
DATE
03/31/2022
NORTH
PROJECT NO.
014765000
TITLE
HYDRO BASIN
PRE-DEVELOPED DRAINAGE AREAS

MAP
8.0

Packet Pg. 201
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Specimen Tree Report
SPECIMEN TREE REPORT Specimen Tree Inventory
Vijay Dr
CITY OF CHAMBLEE Some trees on a site warrant special consideration and encouragement for
preservation. The intent of these specifications is to provide the necessary information
to facilitate project design, plan review and enforcement processes. The City of Chamblee
Specimen tree specifications are organized by size:
Client Understory trees over 4” DBH

Hardwood trees over 24” DBH
Pine trees over 30” DBH
Grover Corlew Acquisitions LLC

Any tree that does not meet the following requirements as set forth by the International
Society of Arboriculture shall be deemed poor in condition, a danger to human life and
property and removed from the site.
Life expectancy less than 15 years
Address
A trunk with visible decay
More than one major and several minor dead limbs (hardwoods)
Major insect or pathological problems
Vijay Dr Site Location

The site is a developed parcel in a developed part of the city. It is composed of 9
industrial buildings with pavement surrounding the structures. On the periphery of the
site are steep slopes with large trees. The trees are Poplars, Oaks and Pines. There is a
drainage system in the Southeast corner of the parcel and with some large trees located
in that woodland.
Definitions
Project Survey Date Tree Number: Trees are tagged with an aluminum disk that shows a unique number to
identify the tree.
Species: Trees are listed by a regional common name and botanical name.
Diameter at Breast Height (DBH): The diameter of a trunk at 4.5’ above ground level.
Measured in inches.
22023 3/7/2022 Condition:
Good: A specimen tree with healthy productive tip growth. A sound trunk with no visible
Alex Phillips Canopy damage or decay. No major limb loss and healthy branch unions. No visible insect or
disease infestations. Life expectancy of more than 15 years.
ISA Certified Arborist MA-4868A Consultants
Tree Risk Assessment Qualified www.canopy-consultants.com
American Society of Landscape Architects

404.858.7471
CANOPY CONSULTANTS
www.canopy-consultants.com

Packet Pg. 202
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Vijay Dr Vijay Dr
Fair: A specimen tree with healthy but not vigorous tip growth. Less than 30% of crown
is dead. No major dead limbs and no major trunk cavities or damage. Branch unions show
some signs of stress. Tree is expected to live longer than 10 years.
Tree # Species DBH Condition Comments
Poor: More than 30% of the crown is dead or has significant tip die back. More than one
major limb is dead and are large trunk cavities with visible decay. Severe insect or disease Liquidambar styraciflua
2860 26” Good Tree is in good health.
damage leading to immediate death. Roots are visible and show signs of decay and rot. Life Sweetgum
expectancy is less than 5 years.
Pinus spp
Dead: Tree has no bud or leaf production. All limbs are barren and rot is visible. 2861 32” Good Tree is in good health.
Pine
Invasive: Tree species whose native range is not within the Piedmont classification.
Liquidambar styraciflua
Hazardous: Severe or uncorrectable damage that will lead to a loss of property or life if 2862 25” Good Tree is in good health.
there is tree failure. Sweetgum
Liquidambar styraciflua Poor 1 : Multi-trunk with included
2863 52” Poor
Sweetgum bark. Pic 1
Liriodendron tulipifera
Poplar
Poplar
Poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera Fair 1 : Minor trunk wound with
2867 43” Fair
Poplar hollow. Pic 2
Sweetgum
Paulownia tomentosa
2869 25” Poor Poor 2 : Invasive. Pic 3
Paulownia
Quercus alba
White Oak
Quercus falcata
S Red Oak
Pinus spp
Pine
Quercus rubra
N Red Oak
Quercus rubra
N Red Oak
CANOPY CONSULTANTS CANOPY CONSULTANTS

www.canopy-consultants.com www.canopy-consultants.com

Packet Pg. 203
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Vijay Dr Vijay Dr
Quercus falcata Pinus spp Poor 13 : Split with included bark.
2875 34” Good Tree is in good health. 2891 48” Poor
S Red Oak Pine Pic 14
2876 26” Good Tree is in good health. Total Specimen Sized Trees: 32
Sweetgum
Good Condition: 18
Oxydendrum arboreum Fair Condition: 1
Sourwood Poor Condition: 13
Quercus rubra Poor 3 : Split with included bark.
2878 31” Poor
N Red Oak Pic 4
Quercus rubra
2879 26” Poor Poor 4 : Decline. Pic 5
N Red Oak
Quercus rubra Poor 5 : Lean over structure with
2880 27” Poor
N Red Oak weight over lean. Pic 6
Quercus rubra Poor 6 : Split with included bark.
2881 30” Poor
N Red Oak Pic 7
Pinus spp
Pine
Lagestroemia spp Poor 7 : Split with included bark.
2883 23” Poor
Crepe myrtle Pic 8
2884 34” Poor Poor 8 : Major trunk wound. Pic 9
Poplar
Pinus spp Poor 9 : Major trunk wound. Pic
2885 31” Poor
Pine 10
Sweetgum
2887 30” Poor Poor 10 : Poor rooting area. Pic 11
Sweetgum
Pinus spp Poor 11 : Decline and poor rooting
2888 35” Poor
Pine area. Pic 12
Platanus occidentalis Poor 12 : Decline and poor rooting
2889 25” Poor
Sycamore area. Pic 13
Quercus nigra
Water Oak


Packet Pg. 204
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Vijay Dr Vijay Dr
Pic 1 : Multi-trunk with included bark. Poor 1 Pic 2 : Minor trunk wound with hollow. Fair 1 Pic 5 : Decline. Poor 4 Pic 6 : Lean over structure with weight over
lean. Poor 5
Pic 3 : Invasive. Poor 2 Pic 4 : Split with included bark. Poor 3 Pic 7 : Split with included bark. Poor 6 Pic 8 : Split with included bark. Poor 7


Packet Pg. 205
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Vijay Dr Vijay Dr
Pic 9 : Major trunk wound. Poor 8 Pic 10 : Major trunk wound. Poor 9 Pic 13 : Decline and poor rooting area. Poor 12 Pic 14 : Split with included bark. Poor 13
Pic 11 : Poor rooting area. Poor 10 Pic 12 : Decline and poor rooting area. Poor 11


Packet Pg. 206
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
SPECIMEN TREE SIZE Specimen Tree Location
OVERSTORY HARDWOOD 24 INCH
OVERSTORY SOFTWOOD 30 INCH
UNDERSTORY 4 INCH
SPECIMEN TREE LEGEND

CANOPY CONSULTANTS
JOB # 22023
SPECIMEN TREE & CRZ
(404) 858-7471
FAIR SPECIMEN TREE APHILLIPS@CANOPY-CONSULTANTS.COM
POOR CONDITION TREE
TREE
PHI LL
X I SA
ALE
PRELIMINARY
I PS
CERTIFIED
NOT TO BE RELEASED
R B FOR
S CONSTRUCTION
®
A
T
A
A
M
- 4 868
OR I
ISA MEMBER
ISA TRAQ
Vijay Dr
1025 Vijay Dr
Chamblee, GEORGIA 30341
FOR
Grover Corlew
1499 W Palmetto Park Road Suite 415

Boca Raton, FL 33486
SHEET TITLE
SPECIMEN TREE
LOCATION
0 40 80 160 240
SCALE: 1" = 80'
DATE: March 15, 2022
PROJECT: 22023
REVISIONS:
NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Vijay Dr
N SHEET
SPECIMEN TREE NOTE #
SPE
SPECIMEN TREE REPORT COMPLETED ON 3/8/2022 BY CANOPY CONSULTANTS:
ALEX PHILLIPS, MA-4868A
ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST®
ISA MEMBER
ISA TRAQ
1 OF 1
ADDITIONAL NOTES This drawing is the property of Canopy Consultants and is not to be
THE TREE FEATURES SHOWN HEREON WERE SURVEYED BY VALETINO & ASSOCIATES ON 10/15/2021. copied in whole or in part. It is not to be used on any other project
and is to be returned upon request. Canopy Consultants

Packet Pg. 207
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
PROPERTY LINE
Landscape Plan
PROJECT # :
121380
DRAWN BY: MB/ JT
CHECKED BY: CF
PROPERTY
LINE
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(TOTAL AREA: 12.38 ACRES)
CLUBHOUSE
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
(TOTAL AREA:
12.38 ACRES)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LIMITS OF
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
DISTURBANCE Suite 600

(TOTAL AREA: Atlanta, GA 30305
12.38 ACRES)
T 404 365 7600
NE
www.nilesbolton.com
WP
PROPOSED
RETAIL
EA
PR
No. Description Date
OP
CH
ER
TR
TY
EE
LIN
E
RO
AD
PROPOSED
RETAIL
PROPERTY LINE
This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall

LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE remain the property of the Architects and shall not
be reproduced, published or used in any way without
(TOTAL AREA: 12.38 ACRES) the permission of the Architect.
NORTH 40 20 0 20 40 80
SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"
EXISTING TREE (12.38) SYMBOL LEGEND
CRITICAL ROOT ROOT SAVE AREA UNIT CREDIT TOWARDS EXISTING TREE
Tree # DBH Species STATUS ZONE (SF) IMPACTED (SF) % IMPACT VALUE DENSITY (TO REMAIN)
1 24 PINE REMOVED 1017.9 REMOVED 100% 24" NO
TREE TO BE REMOVED
2 20 SWEETGUM REMOVED 706.9 REMOVED 100% 20" NO
4 27 PINE REMOVED 1288.24 REMOVED 100% 27" NO NOTE:
GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS, LLC

CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES
- SEE CALCULATIONS ON L0.02 FOR SPECIMEN TREE REMOVAL MITIGATION;
6 22 POPLAR REMOVED 855.3 REMOVED 100% 22" NO
SPECIMEN TREE TO BE REMOVED DUE TO IMPACT FROM PROPOSED
7 21 POPLAR SAVED 779.3 SAVED 0% 21" YES DEVELOPMENT AND SITE GRADING
8 23 RED MAPLE SAVED 934.8 SAVED 0% 23" YES
CHMBLEE, GA 30341
- ALL DEBRIS FROM TREES CUT OR SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED SHOULD BE
1025 VIJAY DR
REMOVED FROM THE SITE IN A TIMELY FASHION INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ANY
10 23 POPLAR REMOVED 934.8 REMOVED 100% 23" NO PORTION OF THE TREE STUMP ABOVE THE ORIGINAL NATURAL GRADE OR
11 27 PINE SAVED 1288.24 SAVED 0% 27" YES ELEVATION UNLESS ACCEPTED BY THE CITY TREE CONSULTANT FOR A SPECIFIC
REASON.
12 24 PINE SAVED 1017.9 SAVED 0% 24" YES
2860 26 Sweetgum REMOVED 1194.6 REMOVED 100% 26” NO
Pinus spp
2861 32 Pine REMOVED 1809.6 REMOVED 100% 32” NO
2862 25 Sweetgum SAVED 1104.5 SAVED 0% 25” YES
2864 45 Poplar REMOVED 3578.5 REMOVED 100% 45” NO
2867 43 Poplar REMOVED 3267.5 REMOVED 200% 43" NO
Quercus alba
2870 30 White Oak SAVED 1590.4 SAVED 0% 30” YES
Quercus falcata
2871 34 S Red Oak REMOVED 2042.8 REMOVED 100% 34” NO
Pinus spp
Quercus rubra
2873 26 N Red Oak SAVED 1194.6 SAVED 0% 26” YES
Quercus rubra
2874 26 N Red Oak SAVED 1194.6 SAVED 0% 26” YES
Quercus falcata
2875 34 S Red Oak SAVED 2042.8 SAVED 0% 34” YES
Liquidambar styraciflua SHEET TITLE:
2876 26 Sweetgum SAVED 1194.6 SAVED 0% 26” YES
TREE PROTECTION PLAN
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION

Oxydendrum arboreum
2877 10 Sourwood SAVED 176.7 SAVED 0% 10” YES
Pinus spp
Liquidambar styraciflua SHEET NUMBER:
Quercus nigra
L0.01
2890 25 Water Oak SAVED 1104.5 SAVED 0% 25” YES
858 TOTAL CALIPER INCHES TOTAL EXISTING DBH 858
DBH INCHES REMOVED 561
DBH INCHES SAVED 297 00-00-0000

Packet Pg. 208
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Landscape Plan
END OF American Holly Little Gem Magnolia Nellie Stevens Holly Red Maple American Holly American Holly
Little Gem Magnolia Laurel Oak Nellie Stevens Holly American Holly Little Gem Magnolia Nellie Stevens Holly (10)
BUFFER AREA (5) (5) (5) (6) (10) (6)
(8) (12)
(3) (6) (5)
Dogwood
(2)
Laurel Oak
(2)
Little Gem Magnolia Little Gem Magnolia
(6) (3)
Laurel Oak Red Maple PROJECT # :

(1) (3) Nellie Stevens Holly 121380
Red Maple Red Maple Laurel Oak Laurel Oak
Red Maple (5) (3)
(1) (1) (2)
(4)
DRAWN BY: MB/ JT
Laurel Oak Encore Azalea American Holly
(2) (10) (5) CHECKED BY: CF
American Holly
(7)
Laurel Oak
PROPERTY LINE
Red Maple
(2) (1)
Dogwood
(3)
PROPERTY
LINE
Redbud
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(2)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Dogwood
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Redbud
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Redbud
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(6)
O
Little Gem Magnolia
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(6)
(4) (5)
Laurel Oak Red Maple
(2) Red Maple (3) Dogwood Red Maple
(4) (3) (9)
Nellie Stevens Holly
(7) CLUBHOUSE PROPERTY LINE
Redbud
(3)
Red Maple
Laurel Oak Dogwood (3) Redbud Dogwood Red Maple
(5) Redbud (4) (2) (3) Encore Azalea
(9)
O
O
O
Dogwood
O
O
Red Maple
O
O
O
O
O
Laurel Oak
O
O
O
O
O
O
Red Maple Red Maple
O
O
(10)
O
O
O
O
(6)
O
O
O
O
O
O
Red Maple
O
O
Redbud
O
O
O
(4)
O
O
O
(3)
O
O
O
(2)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(2) (3)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Red Maple
O
O
O
(4) (2)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Encore Azalea
O
(7) 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(10) Encore Azalea Anise

(10) Suite 600
(55)
Red Maple Atlanta, GA 30305
Little Gem Magnolia (5)
(7)
Redbud DETENTION POND T 404 365 7600
NE
(3) Dogwood
American Holly (3)
www.nilesbolton.com
WP
(7) PROPOSED
Laurel Oak RETAIL
(2) BUFFER AREA
EA
PR
Encore Azalea No. Description Date
Encore Azalea (10)
OP
CH
EXISTING TREES Laurel Oak (10)
Red Maple
ER
(1) Red Maple Red Maple Laurel Oak Red Maple
TR
Encore Azalea (5) (2)
TY
(4) (2) (3)
(10)
EE
LIN
E
RO
Redbud BEGINNING OF Dogwood
(3) (2)
BUFFER AREA
AD
Nellie Stevens Holly Red Maple PROPOSED
(8) BUFFER AREA EXISTING TREES (3)
RETAIL
Laurel Oak Encore Azalea Encore Azalea
(2) EXISTING TREE Laurel Oak (10) Encore Azalea (10)
(2) (10)
Redbud
(2)
Little Gem Magnolia Dogwood Dogwood Redbud

Redbud PROPERTY Little Gem Magnolia (3)
(5) (2) (2) (2)
(2) Little Gem Magnolia Laurel Oak Nellie Stevens Holly Little Gem Magnolia Nellie Stevens Holly Little Gem Magnolia American Holly LINE Laurel Oak Nellie Stevens Holly Little Gem Magnolia Laurel Oak
American Holly Laurel Oak Dogwood Laurel Oak (1) Laurel Oak American Holly EXISTING TREE (2)
(2) (7) (1) (7) (7) (9) (7) (5) (2) (6)
(7) (3) Laurel Oak American Holly (1) Laurel Oak Little Gem Magnolia (2) (5) This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall
Laurel Oak Laurel Oak Laurel Oak Laurel Oak Laurel Oak Redbud
EXISTING TREES (1) (6) (2) American Holly (2) (2) (1) (4) American Holly (3)
remain the property of the Architects and shall not
(2) (2) (2)
Redbud Dogwood Dogwood Dogwood (4) Dogwood Redbud Dogwood the permission of the Architect.
(3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3)
NORTH 40 20 0 20 40 80
SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"
PLANT SCHEDULE
EVERGREEN SCREEN QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ROOT/CONTAINER CALIPER HEIGHT SPREAD SPACING REMARKS NOTE:
· ALL TREES AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS WILL BE PLANTED AT THE PROPER PLANTING TIMES, PREFERABLY IN THE FALL, WINTER, OR SPRING AND MAINTAINED IN PERPETUITY. THE
75 ILEX OPACA AMERICAN HOLLY FG/BB 3" CAL 16` MIN 5` - 6` AS SHOWN STRONG, CENTRAL LEADER; FULL,
CITY MAY REQUIRE PERFORMANCE BONDS BE POSTED IF PLANTING IS DELAYED DUE TO SEASONALITY.
UNIFORM, DENSE CROWN; WELL · PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE DEVELOPER OR OWNER SHALL POST A PERFORMANCE BOND OR CASH ESCROW GUARANTEEING ALL LANDSCAPING
BRANCHED, DISEASE AND INSECT MATERIALS AND WORK FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS AFTER APPROVAL OR ACCEPTANCE THEREOF BY THE CITY IN A SUM ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY ARBORIST. THE BOND WILL BE
FREE IN THE AMOUNT OF 100 PERCENT OF THE ESTIMATED COST OF REPLACING ALL OF THE LANDSCAPING REQUIRED BY THESE SPECIFICATIONS. AT THE END OF TWO YEARS, THE CITY

MANAGER SHALL MAKE AN INSPECTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR DEVELOPER AND THE BOND COMPANY OF ANY CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE
CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES
59 ILEX X `NELLIE R STEVENS` NELLIE STEVENS HOLLY FG/BB 3" CAL 16` MIN 3` - 4` AS SHOWN STRONG, CENTRAL LEADER; FULL,
UNIFORM, DENSE CROWN; WELL
BRANCHED, DISEASE AND INSECT
CHMBLEE, GA 30341
FREE; SHEARED, PYRAMIDAL FORM,
FULL TO GROUND TREE DENSITY FACTOR CALCULATIONS:
1025 VIJAY DR
SITE AREA 12.38 ACRES TOTAL LANDSCAPE STRIP REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS (NEW PEACHTREE ROAD):
77 MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA `LITTLE GEM` LITTLE GEM MAGNOLIA FG/BB 3" CAL 16` MIN 4` - 5` AS SHOWN STRONG, CENTRAL LEADER; FULL, (SITE AREA CALCULATION BASED OFF OF AREA OF LANDSCAPE STRIP: 1,118.6 SF TOTAL
UNIFORM, DENSE CROWN; WELL DISTURBED AREA OF SITE) REQUIRED VEGETATIVE COVERAGE: 671.2 SF REQ.
BRANCHED, DISEASE AND INSECT (60% OF 1,118.6 SF AREA)
FREE; SHEARED, PYRAMIDAL FORM, REQUIRED TREE DENSITY FACTOR 1238" DBH
FULL TO GROUND (12.38 AC X 100" DBH ACRE) VEGETATIVE COVERAGE PROVIDED:
NO ONE GENUS SHALL REPRESENT LESS THAN 55 SHRUBS (SEE PLANT SCHEDULE BELOW) 660 SF @ 12 SF PER SHRUB
OVERSTORY TREES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ROOT/CONTAINER CALIPER HEIGHT SPREAD SPACING REMARKS 10% AND MORE THAN 30% OF TOTAL TREES TO BE 5 GAL. ILLICIUM PARVIFLORUM
PLANTED; SEE SCHEDULE)
6 TREES (SEE PLANT SCHEDULE BELOW) 300 SF @ 50 SF PER TREE
84 ACER RUBRUM RED MAPLE FG/BB 4" CAL 16` MIN AS SHOWN STRONG, CENTRAL LEADER; FULL, EXISTING SPECIMEN TREE DENSITY FACTOR 858" DBH 4" CAL. BETULA NIGRA
FREE EXISTING SPECIMEN TREE UNITS REMOVED/NOT COUNTED - 561" DBH TOTAL VEGETATIVE COVERAGE PROVIDED: 960 SF TOTAL
_____________ 69.9% COVERAGE
EXISTING SPECIMEN TREE DENSITY FACTOR TO BE SAVED = 297" DBH
55 QUERCUS LAURIFOLIA LAUREL OAK FG/BB 4" CAL 16` MIN 8` - 10` AS SHOWN STRONG, CENTRAL LEADER; FULL,
BRANCHED; DISEASE AND INSECT
TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS:
FREE, STREET TREE - TREE FREE O
FBRANCHES TO 5 FEET TREE REPLACEMENT DENSITY: 1238" DBH
(226" DBH EXISTING SPECIMEN TREES TO BE SAVED
+ 1012" DBH TREES REPLACED)
UNDERSTORY TREES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ROOT/CONTAINER CALIPER HEIGHT SPREAD SPACING REMARKS
RECOMPENSE TREES PROVIDED: + 563" BDH
49 CERCIS CANADENSIS REDBUD FG/BB 3" CAL 16` MIN AS SHOWN STRONG, CENTRAL LEADER; FULL, _____________
UNIFORM, DENSE CROWN; WELL TOTAL PROPOSED TREE DENSITY: = 1801" DBH
FREEBRANCHED, DISEASE AIND
INSECT FREE
PARKING LOT TREE REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS:
56 CORNUS FLORIDA DOGWOOD FG/BB 3" CAL 16` MIN AS SHOWN STRONG, CENTRAL LEADER; FULL, NUMBER OF SURFACE PARKING SPACES ON SITE: 50 SPACES TOTAL
UNIFORM, DENSE CROWN; WELL NUMBER OF REQUIRED TREE ISLANDS: 5 ISLANDS
BRANCHED; DISEASE AND INSECT (50 SPACES/ 1 ISLAND PER 10 SPACES)
FREE
NUMBER OF TREE ISLANDS PROVIDED: 7 ISLANDS
SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ROOT/CONTAINER HEIGHT SPREAD SPACING
100 AZALEA ENCORE `AUTUMN RUBY` ENCORE AZALEA #5 24" - 30" 24" - 30" 36" O.C. FULL, UNIFORM, DENSE CROWN; WELL SHEET TITLE:
ROOTED IN POT; DISEASE AND INSECT
TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN

FREE; LIGHTLY SHEARED
55 ILLICIUM PARVIFLORUM ANISE #5 24" - 30" 24" - 30" 48" O.C. FULL, UNIFORM, DENSE CROWN; WELL
ROOTED IN POT; DISEASE AND INSECT
FREE; LIGHTLY SHEARED
SHEET NUMBER:
L0.02
00-00-0000

Packet Pg. 209
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Landscape Plan
SPREAD (SEE PLANT LIST)
STAKE ABOVE
FIRST BRANCHES
OR AS NECESSARY GENERAL NOTES:
FOR FIRM SUPPORT
SPREAD (SEE PLANT LIST) 1. CITY OF CHAMBLEE REQUIRES A TWO YEAR MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
CONFIRM GOOD
CENTRAL LEADER; FOR ALL TREE PLANTINGS. WATER BAGS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR
"ARBOR TIE" GUYING REMOVE ANY DEAD BRANCHES AND NEWLY PLANTED TREES IF THE SITE IS NOT IRRIGATED.
CORRECT CROWN BY
MATERIAL TRIM BROKEN OR CROSSED 2. ADDITIONAL PLANTING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE SUPPLIED
PRUNING IF
BRANCHES. TO THE CITY OF CHAMBLEE.
2 HARDWOOD STAKES DETERMINED TO BE
NEVER LEAVE V CROTCHES OR 3. WHEN THE TREE IS MOVED, THE ROOTBALL SHOULD ALWAYS BE
2 X 2 DRIVEN (MIN. 18") "ARBOR TIE" PRODUCTS NECESSARY.
DOUBLE LEADERS. ROW SPACING (AS SPECIFIED)
4'-5"
SUPPORTED. TREES SHOULD NEVER BE HANDLED BY THE TRUNK. PROJECT # :
DISTRIBUTED BY TRUNK CALIPER 4. SET TOP OF ROOTBALL A MINIMUM OF 2" ABOVE ADJACENT FINISH 121380
DEEP ROOT PARTNERS, L.P. SHALL MEET ANSI Z60 ROUND-TOPPED SOIL BERM 4" MULCH (AS SPECIFIED)
SPECIFIED SOIL MIX GRADE AND MOUND BACKFILL FLUSH WITH TOP OF ROOTBALL. DRAWN BY: MB/ JT
P.O. BOX 927 CURRENT EDITION HIGH X 8" WIDE ABOVE ROOTBALL.
WATER AND TAMP TO 5. CUT AND BEND BACK TOP OF THE WIRE BASKET TO A MINIMUM OF 12" SET TOP OF ROOTBALL PLANTING BED/TRUF
DECATUR, GEORGIA 30031-0927 FOR ROOT BALL SIZE BERM SHOULD BEGIN AT ROOTBALL
REMOVE AIR POCKETS BELOW THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL BEFORE FINAL BACKFILLING OF LEVEL WITH FINISHED GRADE. CONNECTION (TYP.) CHECKED BY: CF
PERIPEHERY.
(SEE TREE PLANTING ROOTBALL.
3" MULCH MATERIAL PRIOR TO MULCHING, LIGHTLY
DETAIL) 6. CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP AND TWINE FROM THE TOP HALF OF BALL
(3" AWAY FROM
2" MIN.
TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL AFTER THE BALL HAS BEEN BACKFILLED.
TRUNK AND NO MORE IN 6" LIFTS TO BRACE TREE. DO NOT 7. PRUNE AND DISEASE, BROKEN, RUBBING, OR DOUBLE LEADER
THAN 1" ON TOP OF OVER COMPACT. WHEN PLANTING BRANCHES (NEVER CUT A CENTRAL LEADER)
ROOTBALL) HOLE HAS BEEN BACKFILLED, POUR
GENERAL NOTES: WATER AROUND ROOTBALL TO PLANTING SOIL MIX
SPECIFIED SOIL MIX
1. PLUMB TREE BEFORE STAKING SETTLE SOIL.
2. LOCATE ARBOR TIE ABOVE FIRST
SCAFFOLD BRANCHES ADD SOIL MIX TO BRING TOP
3. FOR MULTI-TRUNKED TREES ATTACH OF ROOTBALL TO FINISHED
GENERAL NOTES:
3X BALL SIZE TO LARGEST TRUNK. SLOPE AND SCARIFY SIDES GRADE.TAMP LIGHTLY PRIOR
1. SEE SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO PLANTING.
4. SPACES STAKES EVENLY AROUND THE EXISTING SOIL AND BASE OF PLANTING HOLE TO SETTING SHRUB TO
2. ENSURE ALL AIR POCKETS ARE REMOVED WHILE
OUTSIDE OF THE PLANTING HOLE PREVENT SETTLING
BACKFILL WITH BACKFILLING SOIL MIXTURE
5. REMOVE ARBOR TIE AND STAKES
LOOSENED SOIL. DIG 3. SOAK PLANT PIT IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING.
AFTER ONE FULL GROWING SEASON
AND TURN SOIL TO ROOTBALL SHALL REST 4. DO NOT BREAK ROOTBALL. DO NOT CARRY OR
OR UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 3X BALL SIZE
REDUCE COMPACTION ON MOUND OF UNDISTURBED OR ADJUST ROOTBALL BY USING TREE TRUNK.
6. PRUNE AND DISEASE, BROKEN,
TO THE AREA AND RECOMPACTED SOIL TO PREVENT 5. UNLESS SPECIFIED, STAGGER ROWS OF SHRUBS.
RUBBING, OR DOUBLE LEADER
BRANCHES (NEVER CUT A CENTRAL DEPTH SHOWN. SETTLING
LEADER)
1
TREE STAKING 2
TREE PLANTING (BALLED - UP TO 4" CALIPER) 3
SHRUB PLANTING
1/2" = 1'-0" 1/2" = 1'-0" 1/2" = 1'-0"
3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W.
Suite 600
Atlanta, GA 30305
T 404 365 7600
PLANTING NOTES: www.nilesbolton.com

1. TREE PROTECTION AREAS NOT TO BE UTILIZED AS STAGING AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. ONLY HAND TOOLS ALLOWED INSIDE INSIDE TREE PROTECTION AREAS.
2. ALL MULCH AREAS INSIDE OF THE PERIMETER FENCE TO BE APPROVED DOUBLE HAMMERED HARDWOOD MULCH (3" - 6" THICKNESS). ALL ZONES OUTSIDE OF THE PERIMETER FENCE No. Description Date
TO BE PINESTRAW MULCH, UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. FINISHED GRADE OF APPLIED MULCH LAYER TO BE 1" BELOW ADJACENT PAVEMENT EDGE.
3. A METAL EDGE RESTRAINT IS NOT REQUIRED BETWEEN TURF AREAS AND PLANTING BEDS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
4. ROOT BARRIER IS TO BE INSTALLED WHERE NOTED ON SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT SHEETS PER DETAIL
5. ALL TREES PLANTED OR EXISTING WITHIN TURF AREAS TO HAVE MULCH RINGS PER DETAIL
6. SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT MATERIALS WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR ACCEPTANCE ONLY AFTER WRITTEN REQUEST FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL.
7. MAINTAIN ALL TREES LOCATED ALONG ACCESSIBLE PATHS AND WALKWAYS TO HAVE TRUNKS FREE OF BRANCHES TO 80" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.
8. FINISHED GRADE OF ALL TURF AREAS SHALL BE 4" BELOW FINISHED GRADE OF ADJACENT SIDEWALK BEFORE SOD IS INSTALLED PER AUBURN DESIGN STANDARDS AND DETAIL
This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall

remain the property of the Architects and shall not
the permission of the Architect.

CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES
CHMBLEE, GA 30341
1025 VIJAY DR
SHEET TITLE:
DETAILS AND NOTES

SHEET NUMBER:
L0.03
00-00-0000

Packet Pg. 210
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Overall Site Rendering
Site Key:
PROPERTY LINE
A. 12’ Height Pedestrian
G
Lighting To Match
TH 21 TH 20 TH 19 TH 18
C
Adjacent Light Fixtures
TH 17
TH 22
Along New Peachtree
PROPERTY LINE
G
Road For Consistency

TH 13 TH 14 TH 15
TH 24
B. Ev Charging Station
TH 12
TH 23
TH 16
PR
B C. Compact Parking Spaces
OP
ER
PROPERTY LINE
D. Vehicular Double Swing
NE NE
UNDERGROUND PROPERTY LINE
TY
G CLUBHOUSE
DETENTION
TH 25
WP
LI
D Entry Gates
EA
F
TH 11
CH
E. Pedestrian Pathway
TH 10 TH 9 TH 8
TR
TH 1
DETENTION L Connection
EE
POND TAI
G RE
RO
TH 4 TH 3
F C F. Decorative Metal Fencing
TH 26
AD
G. Decorative Wood Fencing
IL
TH 7 TH 6 TH 5 C R ETA
TH 2
A
G
E N
(5) COMPACT SPACES PROPERTY LINE
0’ 60’ 120’ 240’
Site Data
Existing Zoning IT - Industrial Transitional
Proposed zoning VR - Village Residential
Total Area 12.38 Acres
Front Townhomes 75 Units
Rear Townhomes 66 Units
Total Townhomes 141 Units
Total Density 11.39 Units/ Acre
Clubhouse Amenity 4,315 SF
Total Detention Area 45,000 SF Above & Underground
Retail 4,000 SF
Flats Units 8 units @ 1,116 sf each
Compact Parking Spaces 32 Spaces (10% Required to be compact)
Total Parking Spaces 322 Decorative Metal Fence Decorative Wood Fence Vehicular Double Swing Entry Gate
GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22 | SCALE: 1”=120’ 23
Packet Pg. 211
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Site Rendering - Entry Plaza
G G Site Key:
A. Retail Plaza W/ Site

H Furniture
B. Decorative Pavers
C. Bike Racks (16 Total)

C L
D. String Lights
NE
K E. Vehicular Pavers
WP
F. Masonry Veneer Screen
EA
TH 1
PR
CH
L Wall Dumpster Enclosure
TAI
OP
RE
TR
G. Crosswalk
EE
ER
COMPACT PARKING SPACES
TY
RO
H. Decorative Metal Fencing
E
LIN
AD
I. Decorative Wood Fencing
E
J. Site Wall
B
L K. EV Charging Stations
D
A L. 12’ Height Pedestrian
Lighting to Match Adjacent
Light Fixtures Along
New Peachtree Road for

H
J IL Consistency
TA
RE C
TH 2
COMPACT PARKING SPACES
I J F
GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22 | SCALE: NTS 24

Packet Pg. 212
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Site Rendering - Pool Amenity
Site Key:
TH 14 TH 15
A. Mail Pavilion
B. Monument Sign
C. Amenity Lawn
D D D D
D. Site Bench
E. Pool Deck
L
I F. Pool Amenity
K G. Swimming Pool
A
H. Pool Pavilion
I. Fire Pit W/ Soft Seating
J. Grill Station
K. String Lights
CLUBHOUSE L. EV Charging Stations

C H G E F
J
K
D D D D
N
TH 9 TH 8
0’ 10’ 20’ 40’

Packet Pg. 213
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Site Rendering - Passive Amenity
Site Key:
TH 24 TH 13
A. Site Bench
B. Amenity Lawn
C. Passive Walkway
A
A
D. Detention Pond
TH 12
E. Site Wall
F. Decorative Wood Fencing

C
B
TH 25
TH 11
D E
N
TH 10
TH 26 0’ 10’ 20’ 40’

Packet Pg. 214
GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22 | SCALE: 3/8” = 1’-0”
27
Monument Signage Concept
Chamblee Townhomes
3.C.2.b
Packet Pg. 215
ELEVATIONS 3.C.2.b
ChambleeCHAMBLEE
Townhomes
TOWNHOMES
Unit F-1 (2-Bedroom Units) - Perspective
1 3D VIEW- MIXED USE BUILDING
A3-030
A3-030
GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS | 04/08/22

Packet Pg. 216
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Unit F-1 (2-Bedroom Units) - Floor Plan
HEATED AREA: 1,116 SF

Packet Pg. 217
30
Unit F-1 (2-Bedroom Units) - Elevation
Chamblee Townhomes
3.C.2.b
Packet Pg. 218
3.C.2.b
ChambleeELEVATIONS
Townhomes
CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES
Unit TH-1 (3-Bedroom Plus Units) - Perspective
1 3D VIEW- 20 ' TOWNHOME
A3-010
A3-010
GROVER
GROVER CORLEW
CORLEW ACQUISITIONS
ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22 | 04/08/22 31
Packet Pg. 219
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Unit TH-1 (3-Bedroom Plus Units) - Floor Plan

Packet Pg. 220
33
Unit TH-1 (3-Bedroom Plus Units) - Elevations
Chamblee Townhomes
3.C.2.b
Packet Pg. 221
ELEVATIONS 3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES
Unit TH-2 (3-Bedroom) - Perspective
1 3D VIEW- 24' TOWNHOME
A3-020
A3-020

Packet Pg. 222
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Unit TH-2 (3-Bedroom) - Floor Plan

Packet Pg. 223
36
Unit TH-2 (3-Bedroom) - Elevations
Chamblee Townhomes
3.C.2.b
Packet Pg. 224
CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
Clubhouse - Perspective
1 3D VIEW- CLUBHOUSE
A3-040
A3-040

Packet Pg. 225
CLUBHOUSE ELEVATIONS 3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES
Clubhouse - Elevations
FIBER CEMENT TRIM -
ASPHALT SHINGLE COLOR 3
ROOF STANDING SEAM ASPHALT SHINGLE
METAL ROOF ROOF
FIBER CEMENT
BOARD & BATTEN - STANDING SEAM
BRICK COLOR 1
COLOR 1 METAL ROOF
BRICK COLOR 2
BRICK COLOR 2 METAL CANOPY
CLUBHOUSE ROOF CLUBHOUSE ROOF
10'-1 1/8" 10'-1 1/8"
10'-1 1/8"
FIBER CEMENT
TRIM - COLOR 3 FIBER CEMENT BOARD
& BATTEN - COLOR 1
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1
0" BRICK COLOR 1 0"
BRICK COLOR 2
4 CLUBHOUSE- WEST ELEVATION 2 CLUBHOUSE- POOL SIDE ELEVATION

A3-041 1/16" = 1'-0" A3-041 1/16" = 1'-0"
ASPHALT SHINGLE
ROOF ASPHALT SHINGLE FIBER CEMENT
FIBER CEMENT ROOF TRIM - COLOR 3
BOARD & BATTEN -
METAL CANOPY COLOR 1 FIBER CEMENT
BOARD & BATTEN -
FIBER CEMENT BRICK COLOR 1 COLOR 1
TRIM - COLOR 3
BRICK COLOR 1 METAL CANOPY
CLUBHOUSE ROOF CLUBHOUSE ROOF
10'-1 1/8" 10'-1 1/8"
?
BRICK COLOR 2 BRICK COLOR 2
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1
0" 0"
3 CLUBHOUSE- EAST ELEVATION 1 CLUBHOUSE- FRONT ELEVATION

A3-041 1/16" = 1'-0" A3-041 1/16" = 1'-0"
A3-041

Packet Pg. 226
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
MATERIALS
Architectural Materials
CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES
RUSTICATED BRICK PATTERN BRICK COLOR 1 BRICK COLOR 2 BRICK COLOR 3

``(CLUBHOUSE) (TRIM BRICK)
LAP SIDING BOARD AND BATTEN ACCENT PANELS TYPICAL WINDOW METAL ENTRY DECK GUARDRAILS
SIDING TRIM PROFILE CANOPIES
LAP SIDING - COLOR 1 B&B SIDING - COLOR 2 PANEL SIDING - COLOR 1 SIDING TRIM - COLOR 3 METAL CANOPIES GUARDRAILS
DORIAN GRAY EIDER WHITE DORIAN GRAY GAUNTLET GRAY URBANE BRONZE GAUNTLET GRAY
(SHERWIN-WILLIAMS) (SHERWIN-WILLIAMS) (SHERWIN-WILLIAMS) (SHERWIN-WILLIAMS) (SHERWIN-WILLIAMS) (SHERWIN-WILLIAMS)
A3-050
GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS | 03/28/2022 Packet Pg. 227
3.C.2.b
Chamblee Townhomes
MATERIALS
Architectural Materials
CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES
EXTERIOR RECESSED LIGHTS AT

ENTRY CANOPY
FRONT DOOR GARAGE DOOR TERRACE AND DOORS - URBANE BRONZE

WITH SIDE LITE AND DECK DOOR (SHERWIN-WILLIAMS)
TRANSOME
EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE ABOVE REAR

DOORS AND ADJACENT TO RETAIL
BUILDING RESIDENCE DOORS
TYPICAL WINDOWS DORMER AND ACCENT WINDOWS ROOF SHINGLES ACCENT SOFFIT LIGHTING
(4 OVER 1 LITES) (4 LITES) WEATHERED WOOD (IN SELECT LOCATIONS)
A3-051
GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS | 03/28/2022 Packet Pg. 228
510-213-0968
nishamanand@gmail.com
Medium Density Residential
3.C.2.c
Packet Pg. 229

Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applications and Letters of Intent (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map, Rezoning,
3
510-213-0968
21
nishamanand@gmail.com
> 100,000 sq.ft.
3.C.2.c
Packet Pg. 230

3.C.2.c
DCI Letter of Intent
I. Project Summary
This Development of Community Impact (DCI) application contemplates the

redevelopment of the property located at 5007 New Peachtree Road and 1100 Vijay Drive.
The subject property contains 12.38 acres and the proposed redevelopment will include 141
townhome units, 8 multifamily units and approximately 4,000 square feet of commercial space
in two mixed use buildings.
Vehicular access to the project is located at a single ingress/egress drive along New
Peachtree Road. The townhomes will each have two car garages and additional space for two
cars in their respective driveways along with guest parking available throughout the
development. Parking for the multifamily uses will be provided in a surface parking lot behind
the commercial buildings along New Peachtree Road. Parking for the retail use will be
accommodated in the surface parking lot behind the respective buildings. A pedestrian
connection along the eastern portion of the property is being provided to the immediately
adjacent property to the east operated by GDOT. The New Peachtree Road Trail is also being
installed with a five-foot landscape strip, twelve-foot sidewalk/trail and an eight-foot
supplemental zone to further support and encourage multi-use pedestrian activity. Tree
spacing and pedestrian amenities will be provided in accordance with the requirements of the
zoning code.
As it relates to the residential portion of this development, the proposed townhome

project is being designed to for-sale townhome product standards. The townhome project will
meet all civil engineering, platting and utility requirements for for-sale product type.
Additionally, the townhomes will be built to quality levels matching or exceeding those
recently built in the community. The exterior and interior unit finish levels will mirror those
of for-sale product type by providing designer quality flooring, cabinetry, countertops,
plumbing and lighting fixtures as standard finishes throughout each townhome.
The townhomes will not be delivered for an estimated 18+ months from site plan
approval. Considering not only the lengthy delivery timeline but also the uncertain current
economic environment, with rising interest rates, labor and supply chain constraints, the
Applicant would like to reserve the right to either rent or sell the proposed multifamily and
townhome units. In either scenario, the Applicant is proposing that the 8 multifamily units in
the mixed-use building above the commercial space, be either rented or sold as workforce
units. These workforce units would follow the Atlanta Office of Housing and Community
Development Income Limits and Rents/Sales Price Limits based on 120% AMI of the Atlanta
Metro Area as published annually.
Concurrently with this DCI application, the applicant is requesting a rezoning and
amendment to the future land use map. Variances and a waivers are also being requested as a
part of this DCI as further described in this application.
II. Review and Approval Criteria in Section 280-24
15018764v1
Packet Pg. 231
3.C.2.c
a. Design shall be in harmony with the general character of the neighborhood and
surrounding area, considering factors such as mass, placement, height, changing land
use patterns, and consistency of exterior architectural treatment, especially in areas
of historic and special design interest.
The property is located in a transitioning area that remains predominantly residential. The
properties immediately adjacent are improved with a townhome development, single family
residential, GDOT and commercial office space and the rail lines immediately across New
Peachtree Road. The project includes eight (8) multifamily units atop commercial buildings
along New Peachtree Road that are approximately 39 feet in height. The remainder of the
property is planned to include 141 townhouses. Both the multifamily/commercial buildings
and the townhouses will utilize brick and other materials on exterior facing facades that are
aligned with the industrial past of the area.
b. Design components shall be planned such that they are physically and aesthetically
related and coordinated with other elements of the project and surrounding
environment to ensure visual continuity of design.
There is a mix of architectural styles, sizes and types that are located in the general area. The
townhome development to the immediate west of the property is the only style in the area that
would be desirable to utilize. As shown in the design book, the design of the project has
attempted to be considerate to the single family uses in the area. The massing, parking
locations and facades have all been designed to complement the existing surrounding area and
to be consistent within the project site. Further, the design of the mixed use buildings
containing the commercial and multifamily uses were designed as shown to provide an
additional exterior amenity space. This design supports community gathering along with the
larger plaza spaces that are designed to be enjoyed by all residents and patrons of the
development.
c. Design shall protect scenic views, particularly those of open space, and utilize natural
features of the site.
There are no scenic views located on the site that warrant protection. The maintenance of the
buffer areas along the eastern and southern property lines will protect slope/grades and foliage.
d. Design shall protect adjacent properties from negative visual and functional impacts.
The property currently contains various automotive repair/storage type industrial buildings
along with a commercial nursery garden. The proposed development completely replaces
these mostly concrete and metal structures and uses with a new development that has been
designed to minimize visual and functional impacts on adjacent properties through the use of
high quality exterior finishes. This is particularly the case as it relates to the single family
zoning to the east and south where a vegetated and largely undisturbed buffer will be
maintained along the east and southerly property lines.
Packet Pg. 232

3.C.2.c
e. Design shall respect the historical character of the immediate area as integral parts of
community life in the city and shall protect and preserve structures and spaces which
provide a significant link within these areas.
To the extent possible, the proposed development embraces and protects the historical
character of the existing area. Further, there are no significant historical structures or spaces
located within the project site that warrant preservation or protection.
f. All exterior forms, attached to buildings or not, shall be in conformity with, and
secondary to, the building.
The proposed project includes consistent architectural styling and design. The architectural
elevations show all exterior forms and designs of the buildings.
g. The proposed development is suitable in view of the use and development of adjacent
and nearby property.
Adjacent and nearby properties are developed with, single family residential, townhome,
commercial and office uses that supports the change in zoning to a less intensive zoning district
more aligned with the existing character of the area. The property immediately west of the
property is a townhome development that was rezoned to the VR zoning district which is the
same as the request being made in this application. By positioning the commercial mixed use
buildings along New Peachtree Road frontage, the commercial component is aligned with
GDOT office to the east and commercial construction company office to the west. The project
then transitions to townhomes in the southerly portion of the subject site, matching the
townhome community to the west, and providing a transition to the single family
neighborhoods to the south and east. The requested zoning district is consistent with the New
Peachtree Road character area recommendations within the comprehensive plan which
evidences the suitability of the proposed use.
h. The proposed development does not adversely affect the existing use or usability of
adjacent or nearby property.
As noted above, the property as currently zoned is entitled for significant nonresidential
industrial development with uses that are not compatible with the adjacent and nearby single
family and townhome developments. The zoning proposal would allow development that is
complementary to the surrounding character of the area and will not adversely affect the
existing use or usability of the adjacent or nearby property.
i. The proposed development does not result in a use which will or could cause an
excessive or burdensome use of existing streets, transportation facilities, utilities or
schools.
An excessive or burdensome use of existing streets, transportation facilities, utilities or schools

is not anticipated by this application. A traffic study has been provided that addresses the
traffic impact of the project. All utilities necessary for the project are available to the property
Packet Pg. 233

3.C.2.c
or will be accommodated in the manner required by applicable law. Due to the inclusion of
residential uses on the property, the project will have an impact on schools but the impact is
expected to be minimal due to the nature of townhouse and multifamily uses.
j. The proposed development is in conformance with the applicable zoning district.
Concurrently with this application, the applicant is requesting a rezoning and future land use
map amendment. This application does request variances and waivers to the general zoning
ordinance requirements.
k. The proposed development is in conformance with the provisions of the future

development plan articulated in the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
The property is designated Mixed Use and is located in the New Peachtree Road character area
in the city’s comprehensive plan. The New Peachtree Road character area recommends the
VR, CC, CVC and VC zoning districts. The proposed development is consistent with the
proposal to rezone the property to VR. This rezoning will allow for the gradual change from
light industrial/commercial to the medium density character that is a part of the vision for the
character area. Additionally, the project is consistent with the New Peachtree Road character
area policies to market the area for mixed use redevelopment and economic investment,
provision of new sidewalks of at least eight feet.
Packet Pg. 234

3.C.2.c
LEGAL DESCRIPTION - TRACT 1 (BASED ON THIS SURVEY)
All that tract or parcel of land lying and being in Land Lot 278 of the 18th Land District, City of Chamblee,
DeKalb County, Georgia, said tract or parcel of land being more fully shown and designated as Tract 1 on
a plat of survey prepared by Valentino & Associates, Inc. (lob #21-053; Drawing/File #21-053), bearing the
seal of Glenn A. Valentino, Ga. Registered Land Surveyor #2528, and being more particularly described,
with bearings relative to Grid North, Georgia West Zone, as follows:
To find the POINT OF BEGINNING, COMMENCE at a point at the intersection of the westerly right-of-way
line of Clairmont Place (60' public RNV, per Plat Book 16, page 5) and the southeasterly right-of-way line
of New Peachtree Road (variable width public R/W, per Deed Book 4988, page 216);
THENCE proceeding along said southeasterly right-of-way line of New Peachtree Road a distance of 197.13
feet to a concrete right-of-way monument found;
THENCE continuing along said southeasterly right-of-way line of New Peachtree Road the following
courses and distances, South 65 degrees 27 minutes 04 seconds West for a distance of 200.84 feet to a
1/2" rebar found;
THENCE South 66 degrees 17 minutes 03 seconds West for a distance of 243.11 feet to a 1/2" iron pin set,
said 1/2" iron pin set being the POINT OF BEGINNING.
THENCE departing said southeasterly right-of-way line of New Peachtree Road, South 00 degrees 37
minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 518.13 feet to a 1/2" open top pipe found;
THENCE South 00 degrees 01 minute 18 seconds West a distance of 852.55 feet to a 3/8" steel rod found;
THENCE North 89 degrees 52 minutes 39 seconds West a distance of 492.09 feet to a 1" open top pipe
found; THENCE North 00 degrees 21 minutes 42 seconds West a distance of 238.89 feet to a computed
point; THENCE North 89 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds East a distance of 275.00 feet to a computed
point; THENCE North 03 degrees 37 minutes 49 seconds East a distance of 158.00 feet to a computed
point; THENCE South 89 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds West a distance of 286.00 feet to a computed
point; THENCE North 00 degrees 21 minutes 42 seconds West a distance of 458.48 feet to a 1/2" rebar
found; THENCE North 89 degrees 32 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 198.41 feet to a 1/2" rebar
and cap found; THENCE North 89 degrees 55 minutes 48 seconds East a distance of 46.76 feet to a 1/2"
rebar and cap found; THENCE North 00 degrees 17 minutes 56 seconds East a distance of 30.03 feet to a
1/2" rebar and cap found; THENCE North 60 degrees 29 minutes 59 seconds East a distance of 3.03 feet
to a computed point; THENCE North 01 degree 07 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 26.36 feet to a
1/2" rebar and cap found; THENCE North 01 degree 10 minutes 39 seconds East a distance of 121.20 feet
to a 1/2" rebar and cap found; THENCE South 89 degrees 28 minutes 41 seconds West a distance of 1.61
feet to a 1/2" rebar and cap found; THENCE North 00 degrees 23 minutes 07 seconds East a distance of
95.41 feet to a 1/2" rebar found; THENCE North 00 degrees 24 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of
128.15 feet to a PK (masonry nail set) on said southeasterly right-of-way line of New Peachtree Road;
THENCE proceeding along said southeasterly right-of-way line of New Peachtree Road, North 65 degrees
29 minutes 12 seconds East a distance of 265.18 feet to a 1/2" iron pin set, said 1/2" iron pin set being
the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Packet Pg. 235

3.C.2.c
Said tract or parcel of land contains 11.304 acres or 492,390 square feet and is intended to be a portion
of the same tract or parcel of land previously conveyed by Deed Book 29488, Page 610, DeKalb County,
Georgia records.
a plat of survey prepared by Valentino & Associates, Inc. (Job #21-053; Drawing/File #21-053), bearing the
line of Clairmont Place (60' public RAW, per Plat Book 16, page 5) and the southeasterly right-of-way line
1/2" rebar found; THENCE South 66 degrees 17 minutes 03 seconds West for a distance of 243.11 feet to
a 1/2" iron pin set; THENCE departing said southeasterly right-of-way line of New Peachtree Road, South
00 degrees 37 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 518.13 feet to a 1/2" open top pipe found;
THENCE South 00 degrees 01 minute 18 seconds West a distance of 852.55 feet to a 3/8" steel rod found;
THENCE North 89 degrees 52 minutes 39 seconds West a distance of 492.09 feet to a 1" open top pipe
found; THENCE North 00 degrees 21 minutes 42 seconds West a distance of 238.89 feet to a computed
point, said computed point being the POINT OF BEGINNING.
THENCE North 00 degrees 21 minutes 42 seconds West a distance of 158.00 feet to a computed point;
THENCE North 89 degrees 47 minutes 23 seconds East a distance of 286.00 feet to a computed point;
THENCE South 03 degrees 37 minutes 49 seconds West a distance of 158.00 feet to a computed point;
THENCE South 89 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds West a distance of 275.00 feet to a computed point,
said computed point being the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said tract or parcel of land contains 1.016 acres or 44,268 square feet and is intended to be the same tract
or parcel of land previously conveyed by Deed Book 24096, Page 733, DeKalb County, Georgia records.
a plat of survey prepared by Valentino & Associates, Inc. (lob #21-053; Drawing/File #21-053), bearing the
Packet Pg. 236

3.C.2.c
line of Clairmont Place (60' public R/W, per Plat Book 16, page 5) and the southeasterly right-of-way line
1/2" rebar found;
THENCE South 66 degrees 17 minutes 03 seconds West for a distance of 243.11 feet to a 1/2" iron pin set,
said 1/2" iron pin set being the POINT OF BEGINNING.
THENCE continuing along said southeasterly right-of-way line of New Peachtree Road, South 65 degrees
29 minutes 12 seconds West a distance of 265.18 feet to a PK (masonry) nail set;
THENCE departing said southeasterly right-of-way line of New Peachtree Road, North 00 degrees 24
minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 12.02 feet to a drill hole found in concrete;
THENCE North 66 degrees 16 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 263.34 feet to a 1/2" rebar found;
THENCE South 00 degrees 37 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 7.92 feet to a 1/2" iron pin set on said
southeasterly right-of-way line of New Peachtree Road, said 1/2" iron pin set being the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Said tract or parcel of land contains 0.055 acres or 2,404 square feet and is intended to be a portion of
the same tract or parcel of land previously conveyed by Deed Book 29488, Page 610, DeKalb County,
Georgia records.
Packet Pg. 237

3.C.2.c
Future Land Use Amendment and Rezoning Letter of Intent
I. Project Summary
This future land use amendment and rezoning application contemplates the
redevelopment of the property located at 5007 New Peachtree Road and 1100 Vijay Drive.
Currently and for many years prior the property has been used for a variety of industrial uses.
The subject property contains 12.38 acres and the proposed redevelopment will include 141
townhome units, 8 multifamily units and approximately 4,000 square feet of commercial space.
Vehicular access to the project is located at a single ingress/egress drive along New
Peachtree Road. The townhomes will each have two car garages and additional space for two
cars in their respective driveways along with guest parking available throughout the
development. Parking for the multifamily uses will be provided in a surface parking lot behind
the buildings along New Peachtree Road. Parking for the retail use will be accommodated in
the surface parking lot behind the respective buildings. A pedestrian connection along the
eastern portion of the property is being provided to the immediately adjacent property to the
east operated by GDOT subject to GDOT’s approval. The New Peachtree Road Trail is also
being installed with a five-foot landscape strip, twelve-foot sidewalk/trail and an eight-foot
supplemental zone to further support and encourage multi-use pedestrian activity. Tree
spacing and pedestrian amenities will be provided in accordance with the requirements of the
zoning code.
As it relates to the residential portion of this development, the proposed townhome

project is being designed to for-sale townhome product standards. The townhome project will
meet all civil engineering, platting and utility requirements for for-sale product type.
Additionally, the townhomes will be built to quality levels matching or exceeding those
recently built in the community. The exterior and interior unit finish levels will mirror those
of for-sale product type by providing designer quality flooring, cabinetry, countertops,
plumbing and lighting fixtures as standard finishes throughout each townhome.
The townhomes will not be delivered for an estimated 18+ months from site plan
approval. Considering not only the lengthy delivery timeline but also the uncertain current
economic environment, with rising interest rates, labor and supply chain constraints, the
Applicant would like to reserve the right to either rent or sell the proposed multifamily and
townhome units. In either scenario, the Applicant is proposing that the 8 multifamily units in
the mixed-use building above the commercial space, be either rented or sold as workforce
units. These workforce units would follow the Atlanta Office of Housing and Community
Development Income Limits and Rents/Sales Price Limits based on 120% AMI of the Atlanta
Metro Area as published annually
The entire property is currently zoned IT and this application requests a rezoning to
VR. A future land use amendment is requested to change from Mixed Use to Medium Density
Residential. Concurrently with this application, the applicant is requesting approval a
Development of Community Impact (DCI) and waivers and variances as further described in
the DCI application.
15017630_1 - 4/11/2022 11:45:33 AM

Packet Pg. 238
3.C.2.c
II. Future Land Use Map Amendment Review and Approval Criteria in Section 280-
17
a. Whether the land use amendment proposal is compatible with the surrounding future
land uses as identified in the future development map.
The property has a Mixed Use future land use designation and is located in the New Peachtree
Road character area. The abutting properties to the south and east have a Low Density
Residential future land use designation. Additional abutting properties to the east also have
Mixed Use and Low Density Residential future land use designations and located in the New
Peachtree Road character area. The property located immediately west is designated as
Medium Density Residential. Immediately north of the property are rail lines and a
Commercial character area. The surrounding area has a mix of future land use designations.
The proposal to develop townhomes, multifamily and commercial is compatible based on the
mix uses in the immediate area.
b. Whether the land use amendment proposal can be adequately served by existing
transportation facilities and other infrastructure such as schools, water and sewer.
The proposal to amend the future land use map will not impact the service of transportation
facilities and other infrastructure. A traffic study has been provided as part of this application
to address the expected traffic impact of the project. All utilities necessary for the project are
available to the property. As a result of the residential uses on the property, the project will
have an impact on schools, however, the impact is expected to be minimal due to the nature of
townhome and multifamily uses.
c. Whether the land use amendment proposal negatively impacts natural and historic
resources identified in the City.
There are no natural and historic resources located on the property.
d. Whether the land use amendment proposal is in the best interest of the City and the
public good and whether the proposal impacts the health and welfare of its citizens.
The proposal to replace an existing automobile repair/storage and nursery garden with the
proposed use benefits the health and welfare of the citizens. Amending the future land use map
to Medium Density Residential aligns the future land use plan with the policies of the New
Peachtree Road character area. This allows the replacement of the existing use with a use more
aligned with the area, which is directly beneficial to the citizens.
e. Whether the property to be affected by the land use amendment proposal has a
reasonable economic use as currently designated on the future development map.
While the future land use map designation could accommodate a mixed use redevelopment of
the property, the future land use map and the current zoning district are misaligned. Under the
Packet Pg. 239

3.C.2.c
existing zoning, the property could be redeveloped to one of the higher intensity industrial type
uses. The unique nature of this property with the limited frontage along New Peachtree Road
would not yield the type of frontage and traffic that would make any mixed use project under
the current zoning viable. Non-residential development is permitted but not to the degree
capable of being a true mixed use project. The existing zoning is not compatible with the plans
for this area nor is it compatible with the existing character of development in the area, which
means the demand is misaligned with the plans, which reduces the economic use. This
proposal aligns the uses allowed by the character area with the uses allowed in the zoning
district and further aligns the use of the property with uses in the immediate area.
f. Whether the land use amendment proposal meets the policies and intent established
in the future development map.
The proposed amendment meets several policies of the future development map in the
comprehensive plan. This amendment will allow for the gradual change from light industrial
to the medium density character that is a part of the vision for the character area. Additionally,
the project is consistent with the New Peachtree Road character area policies to market the
area for mixed use redevelopment and economic investment, provision of new sidewalks of at
least eight feet.
g. The proposed development is suitable in view of the use and development of adjacent
and nearby property.
Adjacent and nearby properties are developed with a mix of uses that include single family
attached townhome uses and commercial uses in addition to the rail lines located directly
across New Peachtree Road. The proposed development is suitable in light of the existing mix
of uses in the area. This proposal will allow for more of a buffer and transition between the
single family residential uses to the south and east from the more commercialized areas north
of the property. The current use of the property provides no transition or buffer.
III. Rezoning Review and Approval Criteria in Section 280-17
a. The existing uses and zoning of nearby property.
Adjacent and nearby properties are improved with a Georgia Department of Transportation
facility, single family homes, commercial uses and townhomes. IT, VR, NR-1 and VC are the
zoning districts in the immediate area. The subject property has been used historically as
automotive repair and a nursery garden.
b. The extent to which property values are diminished by their particular zoning
restrictions.
The existing zoning of the property would allow various industrial transitional uses to serve as
a transition between commercial and light industrial uses, however, the character of New
Peachtree Road and the nearby single family residential uses are misaligned with the potential
Packet Pg. 240

3.C.2.c
uses under the current zoning. This diminishes the property values of the subject property as
it becomes less marketable. The property values of the adjacent properties are also diminished
as a result of the current zoning.
c. The extent to which the possible reduction of property values of the subject property
promotes the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the public.
Under the current zoning, the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the public are reduced
as the property would allow significant development in too close proximity to the single family
residential homes that are immediately adjacent. There is limited foot and vehicle traffic due
to the location of the rail which greatly reduces the marketability of the property for a use that
would be compatible with the immediate area. Rezoning the property to the VR zoning district
allows for a use that is suitable, complementary and supportive to the health, safety, morals
and general welfare of the public.
d. The relative harm to the public as compared the hardship imposed on the individual
property owner.
As noted above, the existing zoning creates a greater hardship on the public than the proposed
zoning districts.
e. The suitability of the subject property for the zoning proposed.
The property is planned for residential and mixed uses under the comprehensive plan. This
proposed development will act as a transition and buffer between the lower intense uses south
and east of the property from the more intensive uses north of New Peachtree Road. The
development allowed by the proposed zoning is much more suitable for the neighborhood than
the development allowed under the current zoning. The recent townhome development that is
immediately adjacent to the west is further evidence of the suitability of the property for the
proposed use.
f. The length of time the property has been vacant as zoned, considered in the context
of land development in the area in the vicinity of the property.
The property has historically been as automotive repair and a nursery garden and is not
currently vacant.
g. Whether the zoning proposal will permit a use that is suitable in view of the use and
development of adjacent and nearby property.
Adjacent and nearby properties are developed with, single family residential, townhome,
commercial and office uses that supports the change in zoning to a less intensive zoning district
more aligned with the existing character of the area. The property immediately west of the
property is a townhome development that was rezoned to the VR zoning district which is the
same as the request being made in this application. The requested zoning district is consistent
with the New Peachtree Road character area recommendations within the comprehensive plan
which evidences the suitability of the proposed use.
Packet Pg. 241

3.C.2.c
h. Whether the zoning proposal will adversely affect the existing use or usability of
adjacent or nearby property.
As noted above, the property as currently zoned is entitled for significant nonresidential
development with uses that are not compatible with the adjacent and nearby single family and
townhome developments. The zoning proposal would allow development that is
complementary to the surrounding character of the area and will not adversely affect the
existing use or usability of the adjacent or nearby property.
i. Whether the property to be affected by the zoning proposal has a reasonable

economic use as currently zoned.
While the property may have a reasonable economic use as zoned, that use is limited by the
property’s location along New Peachtree Road. Further, the type of development that would
be attracted to the property based on a by right zoning is not compatible with the adjacent and
nearby residential uses nor is it compatible with the comprehensive plan.
j. Whether the zoning proposal will result in a use which will or could cause an excessive
or burdensome use of existing streets, transportation facilities, utilities or schools.
An excessive or burdensome use of existing streets, transportation facilities, utilities or schools

is not anticipated by this application. A traffic study has been provided that addresses the
traffic impact of the project. All utilities necessary for the project are available to the property
or will be accommodated in the manner required by applicable law. Due to the inclusion of
residential uses on the property impact on schools is to be determined.
k. Whether the zoning proposal is in conformity with the policy and intent of the future
development map.
The City’s Comprehensive Plan places the property in the New Peachtree Road character area
and has a Mixed Use future land use designation. The New Peachtree Road character area
recommends the VR, CC, CVC and VC zoning districts. The proposed development is
consistent with the proposal to rezone to VR. This rezoning will allow for the gradual change
from light industrial to the medium density character that is a part of the vision for the character
area. Additionally, the project is consistent with the New Peachtree Road character area
policies to market the area for mixed use redevelopment and economic investment, provision
of new sidewalks of at least eight feet.
l. Whether there are existing or changing conditions affecting the use and development
of the property which gives supporting grounds for either approval or disapproval of
the zoning proposal.
The location of this property is fairly unique as it is between the rail lines to the north, single
family residential to the south and east and in a various mix of uses in the immediate vicinity.
Under the current zoning, the property could be redeveloped to use that is entirely misaligned
with the existing neighborhood and the future plans for the area. As the immediate area has
Packet Pg. 242

3.C.2.c
undergone transition, this proposal presents an opportunity to redevelop this property in
alignment with the existing and proposed character of the area.
Packet Pg. 243

3.C.2.c
Exhibit A
It was anticipated that the flood study would be completed after the rezoning and DCI
permits have been approved. Completion of the analysis is expected to take several months. For
the sake of providing additional floodplain information by April 11 as requested, a floodplain
phasing exhibit has been provided as sheet 3.1, FloodPlan Phasing Plan. This exhibit highlights a
floodplain phasing approach that will be used over the course of the flood study analysis to assess
the ability of the proposed site plan, with grading, to meet the no-rise conditions as set forth in the
City’s ordinances and regulations. The indicated compensatory storage areas on the exhibit,
“potential compensatory storage expansion area 1” and “potential compensatory storage expansion
area 2” will be considered for compensatory storage in the event that no-rise conditions are not
able to be met with the site configuration shown for the purpose of Rezoning and DCI permitting.
First, “area 1” will be considered for compensatory storage and the units within the area will be
removed as needed. Then if additional compensatory storage is needed, area 2 will be considered
in addition to area 1.
Packet Pg. 244

3.C.2.c
BROKEN LINE NOT TO SCALE

FENCE LINE
GUARDRAIL
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE NOT TO SCALE
OVERHEAD TELEPHONE LINE
SANITARY SEWER LINE
CATCH BASIN SINGLE WING
CATCH BASIN DOUBLE WING
COMPUTED POINT
BORING HOLE
CLEANOUT
C
COMMUNICATION BOX RMF
ELECTRIC BOX
E ELECTRIC PANEL OR LINE MARKER
E ELECTRIC MANHOLE
E ELECTRIC METER
ELECTRIC OUTLET
ELECTRIC SWITCH
FO FIBER OPTIC BOX
FIBER OPTIC LINE MARKER
FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION
FIRE HYDRANT
FLARED END SECTION
G GAS LINE MARKER
G GAS METER
G GAS VALVE
GROUND LIGHT
GUY POLE
GUY WIRE
HEADWALL
IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE

LIGHT POLE
POST INDICATOR VALVE
POWER POLE
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SIGN POST
STORM WATER DROP INLET
STORM WATER JUNCTION BOX
STORM WATER YARD INLET
T TELEPHONE MANHOLE
TELEPHONE POLE
TR TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX
TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE
W WATER MANHOLE
W WATER METER
WATER VALVE
W WATER VALVE/LINE MARKER
BO BOLLARD
CMF
CTF CRIMPED TOP PIPE FOUND
DHF DRILL HOLE IN CONCRETE FOUND
FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION
IPF IRON PIN FOUND
IPS 1/2" IRON PIN SET 14. Easement from Arthur Pew Construction Co. to Georgia Power Company, dated August 25, 1955, filed September13, 1955 and
MB MAIL BOX recorded in Deed Book 1141, Page 532, records of the superior court of DeKalb County, Georgia. Surveyor's opinion: Said easement
OTF OPEN TOP PIPE FOUND may affect all tracts of the subject property, the exact location is unknown, is blanket in nature, and is not plottable.
PKF PK NAIL FOUND
PKS PK NAIL SET 15. Right-of-Way Easement from Arthur Pew Construction Co. to Georgia Power Company, dated September 18,1968 and recorded in
Deed Book 2359, Page 329, aforesaid records. Surveyor's opinion: Said easement affects all tracts of the subject property, the exact
RBF REBAR FOUND
location is unknown, is blanket in nature, and is not plottable.
RMF
SRF STEEL ROD FOUND 16. Sewer Easement between Arthur Pew Construction and DeKalb County, Georgia, dated April 11, 1972, filed April 25, 1972 and
SO STUB OUT recorded in Deed Book 2806, Page 47, aforesaid records. Surveyor's opinion: Said easement affects tract 1 and/or tract 2 of the
VP VENT PIPE subject properties, the exact location is unknown, but is shown approximately hereon.
BSL BUILDING SETBACK LINE
C&G CURB & GUTTER 17. Easement from Arthur Pew Const. Co., Inc. to Georgia Power Company, dated October 22, 1974, filed January, 1975 and recorded
in Deed Book 3280, Page 111, aforesaid records. Surveyor's opinion: Said easement affects all tracts of the subject property, the
CP CONCRETE PAD
exact location is unknown, is blanket in nature, and is not plottable.
CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE
CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE 18. Easement from Vijay Anand to Georgia Power Company, dated September 15, 1982, filed August 8, 1983 and recorded in Deed
DB PG DEED BOOK & PAGE Book 4809, Page 16, aforesaid records. Surveyor's opinion: Said easement affects all tracts of the subject property, the exact location
DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE is unknown, is blanket in nature, and is not plottable.
HC HEADER CURB
19. Easements as contained in that certain Right of Way Deed from Vijay Anand to DeKalb County, a political subdivision of the State
HDPE
of Georgia, dated May 25, 1984, filed May 30, 1984 and recorded in Deed Book 4988, Page 216, aforesaid records. Surveyor's
INV INVERT ELEVATION opinion: Said easement affects tracts 1 and 3 of the subject property, is blanket in nature, noted hereon, and shown hereon as tract 3.
OCS OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Applications and Letters of Intent (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map, Rezoning, DCI)
PB PG PLAT BOOK & PAGE 20. Easement from Vijay Anand to Georgia Power Company, dated November 8, 1984 and recorded in Deed Book 5285, Page 489,
PVC PLASTIC PIPE aforesaid records. Surveyor's opinion: Said easement affects tract 1, tract 2, and/or tract 3 of the subject properties, the exact
RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE location is unknown, is blanket in nature, and is not plottable.
TBM TEMPORARY BENCHMARK
21. Easement from Vijay Anand to Georgia Power Company, dated September 10, 1984 and recorded in Deed Book 5285, Page 507,
100.00 SPOT ELEVATION
aforesaid records. Surveyor's opinion: Said easement affects tract 1, tract 2, and/or tract 3 of the subject properties, the exact
location is unknown, is blanket in nature, and is not plottable.
CONCRETE SURFACE
22. Easement from Vijay Anand to Georgia Power Company, dated January 7, 1986, filed May 14, 1986 and recorded in Deed Book
5471, Page 78, aforesaid records. Surveyor's opinion: Said easement affects tract 1, tract 2, and/or tract 3 of the subject properties,
1 REFERENCE TO TITLE EXCEPTION ITEM the exact location is unknown, is blanket in nature, and is not plottable.
23. Easement from Vijay Anand to Georgia Power Company, dated June 10, 1991, filed June 12, 1991 and recorded in Deed Book
LAND SURVEYORS
A REFERENCE TO ENCROACHMENT ITEM 6976, Page 489, aforesaid records. Surveyor's opinion: Said easement affects tract 1, tract 2, and/or tract 3 of the subject properties,
surveyor did not find evidence of the overhang encroachment, as mentioned in said document, and is not plottable.
24. All matters disclosed on plat of survey filed and recorded at Plat Book 6, Page 90, aforesaid records. Surveyor's opinion: All
matters affecting portions of tract 1, tract 2, and tract 3 of the subject property, are shown hereon.
1/10/22: ADD TRACT 3, REVISE

BOUNDARY FOR TRACT 1, REVISE
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS, AND
REVISE CERTIFICATIONS.
2/10/22: ADD TOPOGRAPHY AND
SPECIMEN TREES.
HWD24" HARDWOOD TREE 24" (DIAMETER)

PIN28" PINE TREE 28" (DIAMETER)
A) FENCES MEANDER ALONG PROPERTY LINES.
B) ADJOINER'S WALL ENCROACHES ONTO

SUBJECT PROPERTY 1.9 FEET.
C) ADJOINER'S FENCE ENCROACHES ONTO

SUBJECT PROPERTY 5.0 FEET.
D) TRACT 1 OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY'S FENCE

ENCROACHES INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY 2.2 FEET.
THIS PLAT IS A RETRACEMENT OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OR PARCELS OF LAND AND SCALE: 1" = 50'
DOES NOT SUBDIVIDE OR CREATE A NEW PARCEL OR MAKE ANY CHANGES TO
ANY REAL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. THE RECORDING INFORMATION OF THE DATE: 12/31/2021
DOCUMENTS, MAPS, PLATS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS WHICH CREATED THE
PARCEL OR PARCELS ARE STATED HEREON. JOB NUMBER: 21-053
RECORDATION OF THIS PLAT DOES NOT IMPLY APPROVAL OF ANY LOCAL
TO: GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITION, LLC, AND FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. JURISDICTION, AVAILABILITY OF PERMITS, COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL
FILE NUMBER: 21-053
REGULATIONS OR REQUIREMENTS, OR SUITABILITY FOR ANY USE OR PURPOSE OF PLOTTED: 2/10/2022
R
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE THE LAND. FURTHERMORE, THE UNDERSIGNED LAND SURVEYOR CERTIFIES THAT
WITH THE 2021 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY
ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7A, 7B1, 7C, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, SURVEYS IN GEORGIA AS SET FORTH IN THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE
14, 16, 17, 18 & 19 OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 12/31/2021. GEORGIA BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND
SURVEYORS AND AS SET FORTH IN O.C.G.A. SECTION 15-6-67.
DATE OF PLAT OR MAP: 1/10/2022 BY: GLENN A. VALENTINO, GEORGIA REGISTERED SURVEYOR #2528
TRACT 1 - IS WITHIN ONE FOOT IN 717,652 FEET.
TRACT 2 - IS WITHIN ONE FOOT IN 2,256,139 FEET.
______________________________________________________________
TRACT 3 - IS WITHIN ONE FOOT IN 76,566 FEET. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ GLENN A. VALENTINO GA. R.L.S. #2528
DATE OF EXPIRATION: 12/31/2022
Packet Pg. 245

Rd
e 3.C.2.d
t re
Aerial MapPea ch ut
h er
n
Lowe's So
l k
rfo
Ha
No
Attachment: Attachment 3 - Maps (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map,
rd e
eA
Rd
ee
v
tr
e
e ach
wP
Ne
Bozeman Dr
Rd
t ree
a ch
vd
Pe
w
a t e Rd
Bl
Zaxby's Ne
Rd
e
e
re
re
ht
Clairwood Ter
ht
ac
ing
ac
Pe
Pe
W
V ij a y Dr
Qu i nn Pl
Rd Lawso n Dr
ee
tr
ch 155
S a m a nth a Bnd
a
Pe
ew Ham Dr
N
4 th St
y e r Cir
D
i d g e C rs
rk r t
Pa
5 th S t
Clairmont Park
4/20/2022, 2:20:13 PM 1:4,514

0 0.03 0.06 0.12 mi
Streams City Boundary
Hi c k o ry R
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km
DeKalb County Tax Parcels Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User Community
Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS

d
Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA | Nearmap | City of Chamblee GIS | City of Chamblee GIS, Development | Chamblee GIS | Packet Pg. 246
Rd
e 3.C.2.d
t re
Future Land UsePeaMap
ch
ut
h er
n
Lowe's So
l k
rfo
Ha
No
rd e
eA
Rd
ee
v
tr
e
e ach
wP
Ne
Bozeman Dr
Rd
t ree
a ch
vd
Pe
w
a t e Rd
Bl
Zaxby's Ne
Rd
e
e
re
re
ht
Clairwood Ter
ht
ac
ing
ac
Pe
Pe
W
V ij a y Dr
Qu i nn Pl
Rd Lawso n Dr
ee
tr
ch 155
S a m a nth a Bnd
a
Pe
ew Ham Dr
N
4 th St
y e r Cir
D
i d g e C rs
rk r t
Pa
5 th S t
Clairmont Park
4/20/2022, 2:21:26 PM 1:4,514

0 0.03 0.06 0.12 mi
Streams LowDen Res Office Utilities
Hi c k o ry R
Future Land Use MedDen Res Parks Rec DeKalb County Tax Parcels 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap
Airport Mixed Use Public Ins City Boundary contributors, and the GIS User Community
Commercial Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS

d
d 3.C.2.d
Zoning Map
c h t re
e
R
a rn
Pe he
ut
So
lk
rfo
Ha
No TOD
rd e
eA
d
e eR
ve
ac htr
e
wP
Ne
Bozeman Dr
Rd
ree
a ch t
vd
Pe
w
a t e Rd
Bl
Ne
Rd
e
e
re
t re
Clairwood Ter
ht
h
ac
ing
ac
Pe
Pe
W
IT V ij a y Dr
Qu i nn Pl
Hardee A v e
Rd Lawso n Dr
e
re
ht 155
S a m a nth a Bnd
ac NC-2
Pe VR
ew Ham Dr
N
4 th St
y e r Cir
D
NC-1
rk r i d g e C rs
t
Pa
5 th S t
Clairmont Park
4/20/2022, 2:18:27 PM 1:4,514

0 0.03 0.06 0.12 mi
Rail Trail Overlay Zoning Districts NC-1 TOD
Streams A NC-2 VC 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap
Runway Protection Zones CC NR-1 VR contributors, and the GIS User Community
IT Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS
3.C.2.e
Attachment: Attachment 4 - Traffic Study (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map, Rezoning, DCI)
Traffic Impact Study
Chamblee Residential
City of Chamblee, Georgia
Report Prepared:
March 2022
Prepared for:
Grover Corlew Acquisitions, LLC
Prepared by:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

817 West Peachtree Street NW, Suite 601
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
KH Project #014765001
Packet Pg. 249

3.C.2.e
Traffic Impact Study
City of Chamblee, Georgia
Report Prepared:
March 2022
Prepared for:
Grover Corlew Acquisitions, LLC
Prepared by:
03/30/2022
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

817 West Peachtree Street NW, Suite 601
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
KH Project #014765001
Packet Pg. 250

3.C.2.e
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 Study Area Determination ........................................................................................................... 1
3.0 Existing Traffic Conditions ........................................................................................................... 4

3.1 Roadway Conditions ............................................................................................................. 4
3.2 Vehicular Volumes ................................................................................................................ 4
3.3 Existing Volume Calibrations................................................................................................. 5
4.0 Projected Background (Non-Project) Traffic................................................................................. 8

4.1 Future Roadway / Intersection Projects ................................................................................. 8
5.0 Project Traffic............................................................................................................................ 10

5.1 Project Site Access ............................................................................................................. 10
5.2 Trip Generation................................................................................................................... 10
5.3 Trip Distribution and Assignment......................................................................................... 11
6.0 Level-of-Service Analysis .......................................................................................................... 15
7.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 16

7.1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 16
Chamblee Residential │ Traffic Impact Study i

March 2022│ KHA Project #014765001
Packet Pg. 251

3.C.2.e
FIGURES
Figure 1: Site Location Map ..................................................................................................................... 2
Figure 2: Site Aerial ................................................................................................................................. 3
Figure 3: ADT Comparison ...................................................................................................................... 6
Figure 4: Estimated 2022 Traffic Conditions ............................................................................................. 7
Figure 5: Projected 2024 No-Build Traffic Conditions ............................................................................... 9
Figure 6: Trip Distribution and Assignment ............................................................................................. 12
Figure 7: New Project Trips ................................................................................................................... 13
Figure 8: Projected 2024 Build Traffic Conditions ................................................................................... 14
TABLES
Table 1: Intersection Peak Hours ............................................................................................................. 4
Table 2: Traffic Count Comparison and Adjustment Calculations.............................................................. 5
Table 3: Trip Generation Summary ........................................................................................................ 11
Table 4: Level-of-Service Summary ....................................................................................................... 15
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Site Plan

Appendix B: Traffic Count Data
Appendix C: Volume Development (Trip Generation & Growth Rate Analysis)
Appendix D: Intersection Volume Worksheets
Appendix E: Synchro Analysis Reports
Chamblee Residential │ Traffic Impact Study ii

Packet Pg. 252

3.C.2.e
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the analysis of the anticipated traffic impacts associated with the Chamblee
Residentials development, which is expected to be completed in 2024 (referred to herein as “build-out
year”). This study evaluates the impact of constructing 141 townhomes, 8 apartment units and 4,000 SF
retail space. The approximately 12.38-acre site is located south of New Peachtree Road and east of Quinn
Place in Chamblee, DeKalb County, Georgia.
This report will summarize the analyses of the following three (3) scenarios:
1. Estimated 2022 Traffic Conditions (Existing 2022 traffic volumes with COVID-19 calibration factors
applied)
2. Projected 2024 No-Build Traffic Conditions (Estimated 2022 Traffic Conditions, plus background
traffic growth)
3. Projected 2024 Build Traffic Conditions (Projected 2024 No-Build Traffic Conditions, plus the traffic
associated with the proposed Chamblee Residential development)
Figure 1 provides a location map of the project site. Figure 2 provides an aerial image that captures the
project site and the study roadway network. A site plan is also included in Appendix A.
2.0 STUDY AREA DETERMINATION
The study area consists of the following existing intersections:
1. 8th Street at Caldwell Road/Parkridge Crescent (Unsignalized)

2. Clairmont Road at New Peachtree Road (Signalized)
For purposes of the traffic impact study, New Peachtree Road, Caldwell Road, and Parkridge Crescent are
considered to have an east-west orientation. Clairmont Road and 8th Street are considered to have a north-
south orientation.
Chamblee Residential │ Traffic Impact Study 1

Packet Pg. 253

3.C.2.e
N
Site
Area
LEGEND
Project Site Boundary
Proposed Site Driveway
X Study Intersection
Figure
Chamblee Residential 1
Site Location Map
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 2
Packet Pg. 254
3.C.2.e
N
2
CLAIRMONT ROAD
1
LEGEND
Project Site Boundary
Proposed Site Driveway
X Study Intersection
Figure
Chamblee Residential 2
Site Aerial
Page 3
Packet Pg. 255
3.C.2.e
3.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
3.1 ROADWAY CONDITIONS
The roadways within the study network have the following characteristics:
Clairmont Road is a four-lane, undivided minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 45 MPH in the vicinity
of the study network. Available GDOT counts taken along Clairmont Road, south of New Peachtree Road,
indicate an average daily traffic (ADT) of approximately 24,000 vehicles per day in 2019. Kimley-Horn
collected counts at the same location in March 2022 which indicated an average daily traffic (ADT) of 24,935
vehicles per day.
New Peachtree Road is a two-lane, undivided local road with a posted speed limit of 35 MPH in the vicinity
of the study network.
8th Street is a two-lane, undivided local road with a posted speed limit of 25 MPH in the vicinity of the study
network.
Caldwell Road is a two-lane, undivided local road with a posted speed limit of 25 MPH in the vicinity of the
study network.
Parkridge Crescent is a two-lane, undivided local road with a posted speed limit of 25 MPH in the vicinity
of the study network.
3.2 VEHICULAR VOLUMES

Vehicle peak hour turning movement counts were performed at the two (2) existing study intersections. The
AM peak period was collected from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM, and the PM peak period was collected from 4:00
PM to 6:00 PM. Additionally, a 24-hour, bi-directional tube count was collected along Clairmont Road, south
of New Peachtree Road. The vehicle peak hour turning movement counts for the study intersections were
collected on Tuesday, March 1, 2022.
The AM and PM peak hours for each intersection are listed below in Table 1. The peak hour traffic counts
were used to perform the analysis presented in this report. The complete traffic count data is provided in
Appendix B.
Table 1: Intersection Peak Hours
Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
1. 8th Street at Caldwell Road/Parkridge Crescent

7:15 AM – 8:15 AM 4:45 PM – 5:45 PM
(Unsignalized)
2. Clairmont Road at New Peachtree Road
7:45 AM – 8:45 AM 5:00 PM – 6:00 PM
(Signalized)

Packet Pg. 256

3.C.2.e
3.3 EXISTING VOLUME CALIBRATIONS
Due to COVID-19’s impact on traffic, the existing turning movement counts were adjusted based on
historical data and engineering judgement. GDOT traffic counts taken on Thursday, February 22, 2018
(pre-COVID) were used to calibrate the 2022 traffic counts. A projection using a growth rate of 2.0% was
used to adjust the 2018 counts to compare to counts taken in 2022. The volume comparison is shown in a
tabular format in Table 2. Figure 3 illustrates the comparison between the February 2018 GDOT AADT
and the March 2022 collected ADT.
Table 2: Traffic Count Comparison and Adjustment Calculations
GDOT Counts Collected Counts

Count
Location 2018 AM PM 2022 AM PM
Station ADT Date ADT
AADT Peak Peak ADT Peak Peak
Clairmont Road (s/o Thursday,

089-3443 23,800 26,207 1,895 2,304 24,935 1,810 2,040
New Peachtree Road) 2/22/2018
ADT AM Peak PM Peak

Difference Calculations
Vol Percent Factor Vol Percent Factor Vol Percent Factor
Clairmont Road (s/o

089-3443 -1,272 -5% 1.05 -85 -4% 1.05 .264 .11% 1.13
New Peachtree Road)
As a result of the volume comparison, it was determined that a calibration factor of 1.05 should be used
during the AM peak, and a calibration factor of 1.13 should be used during the PM peak.
The complete traffic count data is provided in Appendix B.
Figure 4 illustrates the Estimated 2022 peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections and the existing
roadway geometry (intersection layout). The complete traffic count data is provided in Appendix B.

Packet Pg. 257

3.C.2.e
Figure 3: ADT Comparison

Packet Pg. 258

3.C.2.e
Estimated 2022
Conditions
386 (702)
133 (302)
44 (22)
2 185 (135)
103 (100)
246 (259) New Peachtree Road
(71) 74
(90) 70
(22) 12
(15) 22
(827) 1,078
(259) 202

Site Driveway A
Vijay Street/
PROJECT
Clairmont Road
SITE
Collected 2022 ADT: 24,935

GDOT 2018 ADT: 26,207
1
72 (95)
13 (23)
1 (3)
3 (3)
9 (2)
Caldwell Road 0 (0) Parkridge Crescent
(80) 133
(9) 5
(54) 67
(25) 54
(26) 32
(0) 0
LEGEND
Existing Laneage
8th Street
XX AM Peak Hour Traffic Volume

(XX) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume
Existing Traffic Signal
Existing Stop Control
Proposed Driveway Figure
X Intersection Reference Number 4
XXX Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Page 7
Packet Pg. 259
3.C.2.e
4.0 PROJECTED BACKGROUND (NON-PROJECT) TRAFFIC
Projected background (non-project) traffic is defined as the expected traffic on the roadway network in the
future year(s) absent the Chamblee Residential development. The Estimated 2022 peak hour traffic
volumes were increased by 2.0% per year for two (2) years to account for the expected background growth
in traffic through year 2024 build-out of the project. Figure 5 illustrates the Projected 2024 No-Build traffic
volumes for the AM and PM peak hours.
4.1 FUTURE ROADWAY / INTERSECTION PROJECTS
The ARC’s Atlanta Region’s Plan, GDOT Statewide TIP (STIP), and DeKalb County transportation projects
were researched for currently programmed transportation projects within the vicinity of the proposed
development that may impact the study network during the analysis period.
No such projects were identified from the ARC Atlanta Region’s Plan, GDOT STIP, or DeKalb County.

Packet Pg. 260

3.C.2.e
No-Build Conditions
Projected 2024
402 (730)
138 (314)
46 (23)
2 192 (140)
107 (104)
256 (269) New Peachtree Road
(74) 77
(94) 73
(23) 12
(16) 23
(860) 1,122
(269) 210

Site Driveway A
Vijay Street/
PROJECT
Clairmont Road
SITE
1
75 (99)
14 (24)
1 (3)
3 (3)
9 (2)
(83) 138
(9) 5
(56) 70
(26) 56
(27) 33
(0) 0
LEGEND
8th Street
Existing Laneage
Existing Stop Control Figure
Proposed Driveway 5
X Intersection Reference Number
Page 9
Packet Pg. 261
3.C.2.e
5.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC
Project traffic used in this analysis is defined as the vehicle trips expected to be generated by the proposed
development and the distribution and assignment of that traffic through the study roadway network. This
traffic impact study evaluated the impacts of adding the new trips generated by the proposed Chamblee
Residential development.
5.1 PROJECT SITE ACCESS
Access to the site will be provided via one (1) proposed site driveways, which is shown on the proposed
site plan in Appendix A. Brief description of the site driveway is as follows:
• Site Driveway A – proposed to be located along New Peachtree Road at the existing intersection
of Vijay Drive. The intersection will continue operating under side street stop-control with one (1)
lane entering the site and one (1) exiting the site. The existing left-turn lane along New Peachtree
Road will be utilized by the proposed site.
The proposed site driveway will provide vehicular access to the entire development. Internal, private
roadways throughout the site provide access to all buildings. Refer to the site plan in Appendix A for a
visual representation of vehicular access and circulation throughout the proposed development.
5.2 TRIP GENERATION
Gross trips associated with the proposed development were estimated using the Institute of Transportation
Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, 2022, using equations where available. Trip
generation for the proposed development was calculated based upon the following land uses:
• Land Use 220: Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise)

• Land Use 822: Strip Retail Plaza
Table 3 summarizes the anticipated net trip generation for the proposed development upon full build-out
(2024). Pass-by reductions were not included as part of the trip generation for a more conservative analysis.
Appendix C provides the detailed trip generation worksheet for the proposed development.

Packet Pg. 262

3.C.2.e
Table 3: Trip Generation Summary
ITE Daily Traffic AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Density
Code Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit
Multi-Family
220 149 units* 1,030 515 515 69 17 52 85 54 31
Housing (Low-Rise)
822 Strip Retail Plaza 4,000 SF 398 199 199 16 10 6 41 21 20
Mixed-Use Reduction -80 -40 -40 -2 -1 -1 -14 -7 -7
Pass-By Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total New Trips 1,348 674 674 85 27 58 126 75 51
* Includes 141 townhomes and 8 apartment units
5.3 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT

The directional distribution and assignment of new trips (project trips) related to the proposed development
was based on a review of land uses and population densities in the area, existing travel patterns in the
area, and engineering judgement. A detailed trip distribution and assignment is shown in Figure 6. Based
on trip generation from Table 3 and the anticipated trip distribution, new project trips were assigned to the
study roadway network. Figure 7 illustrates the new project trips distributed throughout the study network.
Figure 8 illustrates the Projected 2024 Build traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. Appendix D
provides intersection volume worksheets for all study intersections.

Packet Pg. 263

3.C.2.e
Trip Distribution
and Assignment
3 2
20%
70%
15%
New Peachtree Road
30% (20%)
(15%)
(30%)
(70%)
35%
(35%)

Site Driveway A
Vijay Street/
PROJECT
Clairmont Road
SITE
1
(30%)
Caldwell Road Parkridge Crescent
30%
LEGEND
8th Street
Turning Movements
XX% % Entering Trips
(XX%) % Exiting Trips
Proposed Driveway 6
Page 12
Packet Pg. 264
3.C.2.e
Project Trips
Net New
5 (14)
3 2
18 (48)
4 (10)
New Peachtree Road
(21) 8 (9) 11
(6) 9
(14) 17
(30) 40
(24) 9
(15) 20

Site Driveway A
Vijay Street/
PROJECT
Clairmont Road
SITE
1
17 (14)
Caldwell Road Parkridge Crescent
(21) 8
LEGEND
8th Street
Turning Movements
XX AM Peak Hour Project Trips
(XX) PM Peak Hour Project Trips
Proposed Driveway 7
Page 13
Packet Pg. 265
3.C.2.e
2024 Conditions
Projected Build
402 (730)
138 (314)
51 (37)
3 2 192 (140)
176 (143) 111 (114)
18 (48) 256 (269) New Peachtree Road
(113) 174 (83) 88
(21) 8 (100) 82
(14) 17
(30) 40
(38) 32
(860) 1,122
(269) 210
(40) 32

Site Driveway A
Vijay Street/
PROJECT
Clairmont Road
SITE
1
92 (113)
14 (24)
1 (3)
3 (3)
9 (2)
(104) 146
(9) 5
(56) 70
(26) 56
(27) 33
(0) 0
LEGEND
Existing Laneage
Proposed Laneage
8th Street

Existing Stop Control
Figure
Proposed Driveway
8
Page 14
Packet Pg. 266
3.C.2.e
6.0 LEVEL-OF-SERVICE ANALYSIS
Level-of-service (LOS) determinations were made for the weekday AM and PM peak hours for the study
network intersections using Synchro, Version 11. The program uses methodologies contained in the
Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition to determine the operating characteristics of an intersection. Capacity
is defined as the maximum number of vehicles that can pass over a particular road segment or through a
particular intersection within a specified period under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions.
LOS is used to describe the operating characteristics of a road segment or intersection in relation to its
capacity. LOS is defined as a qualitative measure that describes operational conditions and motorists’
perceptions of a traffic stream. The Highway Capacity Manual defines six levels of service, LOS A through
LOS F, with A being the best and F the worst.
LOS for unsignalized intersections with stop control on the minor streets only are reported for the side-
street approaches and major street left-turns. Low levels-of-service for side street approaches are not
uncommon, as vehicles often experience significant delay turning onto a major roadway.
LOS analyses were performed for the AM and PM peak hours under the Estimated 2022 conditions,
Projected 2024 No-Build conditions, and Projected 2024 Build conditions. The results of each analysis are
summarized in Table 4. Synchro analysis reports are included in Appendix E.
Table 4: Level-of-Service Summary

LOS (Delay in Seconds)
Projected 2024 Projected 2024
Approach/ Estimated 2022
Intersection No-Build Build
Movement
AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
1. 8th Street at Caldwell
Road/Parkridge Crescent Overall A (9.0) A (7.8) A (9.1) A (7.9) A (9.3) A (8.1)
(Unsignalized)
2. Clairmont Road at New
Overall C (30.0) C (33.9) C (31.7) D (38.2) C (32.5) D (39.3)
Peachtree Road (Signalized)
EB A (0.0) A (0.0)
3. New Peachtree Road at Vijay
Drive/Site Driveway A WB A (0.9) A (2.3)
(Unsignalized)
NB F (92.0)* E (43.6)*
*As stated above, low levels-of-service for side street approaches are typical, as vehicles may experience significant delay turning onto a major
roadway.
As shown in Table 4, the analysis indicates that all study intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS
and are projected to continue operating acceptably. While the northbound approach of New Peachtree
Road at Vijay Drive/Driveway A (Intersection 1) is projected to operate at LOS F during the AM peak under
Projected 2024 Build Conditions and at LOS E during the PM peak under Projected 2024 Build Condition,
it should be noted that side street delays of this amount are not uncommon as vehicles may experience

Packet Pg. 267

3.C.2.e
significant delay turning onto a major roadway. All other movements at all intersections operate at LOS D
or better.
7.0 CONCLUSION
This traffic study evaluated the traffic impacts associated with the Chamblee Residential development
located south of New Peachtree Road and east of Quinn Place in Chamblee, DeKalb County, Georgia. The
proposed development, which is approximately 12.38-acres in size, will consist of 141 townhomes, 8
apartment units and 4,000 SF retail space.
The study network, which consists of two (2) intersections, was analyzed for the weekday AM and PM peak
hours under Estimated 2022 conditions, Projected 2024 No-Build conditions (two years of background
traffic growth), and Projected 2024 Build conditions (two years of background traffic growth plus traffic
generated by the proposed Chamblee Residential development).
The analysis indicates that all study intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS and are projected to
continue operating acceptably. While the northbound approach of New Peachtree Road at Vijay
Drive/Driveway A (Intersection 1) is projected to operate at LOS F during the AM peak under Projected
2023 Build Conditions, it should be noted that side street delays of this amount are not uncommon as
vehicles may experience significant delay turning onto a major roadway. All other movements at all
intersections operate at LOS D or better.
7.1 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the results of this study, no off-site roadway improvements are recommended.
The following site-access improvement is recommended to serve the Projected 2024 Build traffic conditions
(note: this would be the improvement needed to serve the traffic associated with the Chamblee Residential
development):
• Intersection 3 – New Peachtree Road at Vijay Drive/Site Driveway A

o On-site, provide one (1) lane exiting the site and one (1) lane entering the site
o Proposed to operate as full movement under side street stop control

Packet Pg. 268

3.C.2.e
APPENDIX A
Site Plan

Packet Pg. 269

3.C.2.e
817 W. PEACHTREE STREET, NW

SITE SUMMARY:
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
THE BILTMORE, SUITE 601

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30308
PHONE (404) 419-8700
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
CURRENT ZONING: IT

BUILDING SETBACK:
FRONT: 15 FT
SIDE: 7.5 FT
BACK: 15 FT
LANDSCAPE SETBACK:
FRONT: 10 FT
PREPARED BY
SIDE: 5 FT
BACK: 20 FT
FAR CALCULATIONS:
ACQUISITIONS, LLC.
GROVER CORLEW
FAR PROVIDED:
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (141 UNITS)

PHONE: 000.000.0000
MINIMUM OUSR: 0.2 * NLA = 107,812 SF
TAX ID #18 278 03 010 DB 29013 PG 609 IRREVOCABLE
E
MAYURA GUJARATHI &
TOWNSEND AT ASHFORD
PROVIDED:
TAX ID #18 278 04 064

PRUTHVI DESARAJU
DB 27918 PG 88
PARK COMMUNITY
DB 26933 PG 715
GREEN SPACE: 153,385 SF
PB 253 PG 82
ROW LANDSCAPING: 1,532 SF
LOT 12
ZONED VR
N/F
INTERIOR SIDEWALKS: 35,795 SF
N/F
TOTAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 190,712 SF (0.35* NLA)
E
PROPERTY LINE
TYPICAL 24' X 38' TOWNHOME 7.5-FT BUILDING PROPOSED FIRE PROPOSED LAND USES & DENSITIES:
PREPARED FOR
FRONT ENTRY ONLY SIDE SETBACK HYDRANT
MULTIFAMILY TOWNHOME 141 UNITS
C
C
ANNE MARIE CAMPBELL
TAX ID #18 278 03 011
24.0' 7.5' 2-STORY RESIDENTIAL 8 UNITS

ROSS WARREN &
E
141 36 PARKING SUMMARY:
LOT 11
BY
N/F
38.0' REQUIRED PARKING: 276 SPACES (TOTAL)

5 119 118 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 98 MULTIFAMILY TOWNHOME (141 UNITS) 224 SPACES (1.5/UNIT)
X
TAX ID #18 278 03 063

140 35
NEW PEACHTREE LLC

RETAIL/RESTAURANT (4,000 SF) 40 SPACES (1.0/100 SF)
DB 29651 PG 465
DATE
W
W
W
PB 282 PG 110
E
2-STORY RESIDENTIAL (8 UNITS) 12 SPACES (1.5/UNIT)
E
ZONED IT
139 34
N/F
E
E
(MAX 25% REDUCTION FOR EACH
DB 294983 PG 415TAX ID #18 278 03 013
TAX ID #18 278 03 012
PETER
24.0'
W
138 5.0' 33 USE ALLOWED)
(TYP.)
E 2-STORY RESIDENTIAL (12 UNITS) 9 SPACES (MAX 25% REDUCTION)
FAMILY
LOT 10
PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT RETAIL/RESTAURANT (4,000 SF) 30 SPACES (MAX 25% REDUCTION
N/F
VIJAY

80
SHAGBARK PROPERTY LLC
E
X
32
TAX ID #18 278 03 061

137 133 132 131 130 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97
E
PROPOSED PARKING: 322 SPACES (TOTAL)
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL NEIGHBORHOOD
DB 22283 PG 488
ANAND
79 PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TIE INTO EXISTING CURB MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 282 SPACES (2.0/UNIT)
TRUSTDB 25994 PG 45TAX
31 GARAGE 282 SPACES (2.0/UNIT)

136
ZONED IT
E 5-FT LANDSCAPE ZONE PROPOSED 24 FT WIDE DRIVE
Drawing name: K:\AMT_CIVIL\014765000_Chamblee Townhome\CAD\Plansheets\DCI\3.0 MASTER SITE PLAN.dwg 2.0 OVERALL MASTER SITE PLAN Mar 29, 2022 4:01pm by: MaryCaton.Peffen
78 5-FT CONCRETE SIDEWALK DRIVEWAY 282 SPACES
N/F
APRON AND VEHICULAR
SHARED PARKING 40 SPACES
30 ACCESS POINT
CHRISTOPHER Y.
PROPOSED SECURITY (RESIDENTIAL AND RETAIL)

135
& JULIA FORT VANESSA S.MANNERS DB 12473 PG 363 NISHA JAICHAND
77 CHECK-IN ENTRY
E
PROPOSED 10-FT CONCRETE
NE (VA
MAIL KIOSK PROPOSED SECURITY ENTRY
LOT 9
SIDEWALK
N/F
29 GATE WITH KNOX BOX

134 24.0' 76
X
TYPICAL 20' X 41' TOWNHOME 6 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 10.0'

129 REAR ENTRY EXISTING POWER POLE
WP
28 WITH TYPE 'CH' LIGHT
GREEN SPACE POOL 5.0'
CLUBHOUSE
128
SITE NOTES:
RIA DB 4
ENTRY SIGNAGE
DB
75
GORDON ACRES
LOCATION
ID #18 278 03 014
PB 16 PG 100
127 38.0'
EBA
SUBDIVISION
ZONED NR-1
JASON R. &
1. THE PROPOSED BUILDING INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS

X
29730
C
LOT 8
74 FROM AN ELECTRONIC FILE PROVIDED BY NILES BOLTON
LE 988
N/F
C
126 ASSOCIATES, DATED 03/21/2022 AND IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE
C
5.0'
CWID PG
73 (TYP.) 4 PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE
E UT
20.0'
C
27 19
PG
C
1 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING INFORMATION.
HTHTPRU2B1L6
20.0'
25
125 72
26 PROPOSED FIRE 18
70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM A SURVEY

ABOVE GROUND HYDRANT 6 7 8 9 10 11
DETENTION POND 71 8 FILE PROVIDED BY VALENTINO & ASSSOCIATES, INC., DATED
TAX
EDWARD E. PASCUA ASHISH JAIN &
124 25 17 RETAIL
12/31/2022.
7
EIE
ID
E
24 16
X
#18
123 25.0' 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB
UT
LOT 7
CR
16.0'
N/F
(TYP.) 24.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
VIJAY DRIVE
(TYP.)

20-FT BUILDING 23 15 24.0'
278

R
/W
REAR SETBACK 122
4. SIDEWALK INSTALLED AGAINST BACK OF CURB SHALL BE
03
22 14
O
INSTALLED PER THE PLAN AS MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF
)
015
121 8 CURB.
E
5 6
DB
53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 21 13 RETAIL
TAX ID #18 278 03 016
AD
T
1 2 3 4 5
X
UT
29108
120 20 12
24.0'
LOT 6
15.0' REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH BY MUTCD, GDOT, AND GEORGIA

N/F
(TYP.)
6 STATE CODE.
PG
W
30.0' E
WW
6. REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ALL HARDSCAPE AND
E
263
PROPOSED FIRE X X X X X
REAR TOWNHOME ENTRY PROPOSED FIRE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT X LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
TAX ID #18 278 03 023
HYDRANT
TAX ID #18 278 03 017
DB 28512 PG 601
DAVID LEO & PATRICIA IRENE

(TYP.) HYDRANT
DB 29421 PG 773
PROPOSED 2-STORY
E
AMBER PICKETT &
KINGSFIELD COMPANY LLC

DOUGLAS POUND & ANNA

DANIEL T. DAHM
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN E
TAX ID #18 278 03 024
TAX ID #18 278 03 025
TAX ID #18 278 03 026
TAX ID #18 278 03 028 CLAIRMONT HILLS

KATIE GREEN
TAX ID #18 278 03 029
TAX ID #18 278 03 031
TAX ID #18 278 03 032
TAX ID #18 278 03 033

RESIDENTIAL ABOVE RETAIL
MICHAEL BARTOLACCI
30-FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER

RYAN LEE &
JOHN O. MCCURLEY, JR.

TAX ID #18 278 03 027
CONNECTION TO ADJACENT
BREEN ARMISTEAD
SUSAN L. WEYRAUC
DB 26400 PG 703
JEFFREY SPROCK &

GARRETT
DB 26946 PG 321
STACEY ROTHBARD
DB 27657 PG 641
DB 28426 PG 662
DB 29302 PG 634
DB 28600 PG 618
DB 28494 PG 574
TAX ID #18 278 03 060

SHELBI B. BIVONS
(ADJACENT TO SINGLE FAMILY) PROPOSED SHARED PARKING (TYP.)

KAREN E. LUPTON
DB 8463 PG 156
ASHLEY REBECCA GLEIT
TAX ID #18 278 03 030
DB 14283 PG 404
LOT 5
PROPERTY
LOT 12
BU
JONATHAN E. &
MATTHEW E. &
N/F
ILD
N/F
DB 25643 PG 394
PROPOSED TRASH LOCATION PROPOSED PLAZA

LANKFORD
ING
LOT 13
LOT 14
LOT 15
LOT 17
LOT 18
LOT 20
LOT 21
LOT 22
PROPOSED ADA 15.0-FT BUILDING FRONT
SITE PLAN LEGEND:
E
N/F
N/F
N/F
N/F
LOT 16
N/F
N/F
N/F
N/F
TAX ID #18 278 03 022
RAMP
ZONED IT
N/F
SETBACK
LOT 19
PROJECT
DB 29393 PG 578
TAX ID #18 278 03 058

N/F
ZACHARY CHINN
TRANSPORTATION
GEORGIA DEPT OF
DB 3651 PG 163
TYPE 'CH' LIGHT PROPERTY LINE
LOT 11
N/F
ZONED IT
N/F
TIE INTO EXISTING CURB BUILDING SETBACK LINE
E
SUBDIVISION
ZONED NR-1
PB 17 PG 1
STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
VEHICULAR RATED CONCRETE PAVEMENT
STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT
GSWCC NO.
STANDARD STAMPED CONCRETE (LEVEL II) 0000077807
PAVERS DRAWN BY
MCP
10 PARKING COUNT DESIGNED BY

MCP
REVIEWED BY
IDK
DATE
03/31/2022
PROJECT NO.
014765000
NORTH
TITLE
MASTER SITE
PLAN
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SHEET NUMBER
0 30 60 120
3.0
Packet Pg. 270
3.C.2.e
APPENDIX B
Traffic Count Data

Packet Pg. 271

3.C.2.e
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Click here for Map Chamblee, GA
www.marrtraffic.com
Right Thru Left U-Turn RightThruLeftU-Turn
Parkridge Crescent
Southbound
Tuesday, March 1, 2022 (1-3) 3 9 0 0 12 6 (1-3) Session Parameters
h Session) (03 Period 0700 - 0900 (4-7) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (4-7) (Drop Down Menu)
Peak Hour 0715 - 0815 (8-13) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (8-13) Peak Hour
* the Peak Hour Diagram does not include Bikes Total 3 9 0 0 12 6 Total Volume
(1-3) (4-7) (8-13) Total Total (8-13) (4-7) (1-3)
159 1 0 160 0 0 0 0
82 0 0 82 30 0 0 30
0 Classes (1-3) (4-7) (8-13) Total 3 51 0 2 49

8th St (West)
8th St (East)
Westbound
Eastbound
0 0 0 0 Volume 368 3 0 371 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 1 PHF 0.7729 0
12 0 0 12 81 0 2 79
69 0 0 69 76 0 0 76
(1-3) (4-7) (8-13) Total Total (8-13) (4-7) (1-3)
Total 129 196 0 127 5 64 Total
(8-13) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (8-13)
(4-7) 2 1 0 1 0 0 (4-7)
(1-3) 127 195 0 126 5 64 (1-3)
Northbound
Cardwell Rd NE
RightThruLeftU-Turn U-Turn Left Thru Right
Packet Pg. 272

3.C.2.e
www.marrtraffic.com
Parkridge Crescent
Southbound
(1-3) (4-7) (8-13) Total Total (8-13) (4-7) (1-3)
93 3 0 96 0 0 0 0
104 1 0 105 23 0 0 23
0 Classes (1-3) (4-7) (8-13) Total 2 22 0 0 22

8th St (West)
8th St (East)
Westbound
Eastbound
0 0 0 0 Volume 278 4 0 282 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 3 2 PHF 0.9467 5
20 0 0 20 45 0 0 45
81 1 0 82 68 0 0 68
(1-3) (4-7) (8-13) Total Total (8-13) (4-7) (1-3)
Total 107 127 1 70 8 48 Total
(8-13) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (8-13)
(4-7) 1 3 0 3 0 0 (4-7)
(1-3) 106 124 1 67 8 48 (1-3)
Northbound
Cardwell Rd NE
Packet Pg. 273

3.C.2.e
www.marrtraffic.com
Clairmont Rd (North)
Southbound
(1-3) (4-7) (8-13) Total Total (8-13) (4-7) (1-3)
158 3 0 161 176 0 10 166
144 4 0 148 98 0 2 96
New Peachtree Rd (West)
New Peachtree Rd (East)

1 Classes (1-3) (4-7) (8-13) Total 0 234 4 12 218
Westbound
Eastbound
0 0 0 0 Volume 2366 59 8 2433 0 0 0 0
68 2 0 70 0 PHF 0.9763 0
65 2 0 67 508 4 24 480
11 0 0 11 386 0 11 375
(1-3) (4-7) (8-13) Total Total (8-13) (4-7) (1-3)
Total 613 1240 0 21 1027 192 Total
(8-13) 4 4 0 0 4 0 (8-13)
(4-7) 20 18 0 0 13 5 (4-7)
(1-3) 589 1218 0 21 1010 187 (1-3)
Northbound
Clairmont Rd (South)
Packet Pg. 274

3.C.2.e
www.marrtraffic.com
Clairmont Rd (North)
Southbound
(1-3) (4-7) (8-13) Total Total (8-13) (4-7) (1-3)
135 1 1 137 135 0 4 131
182 1 0 183 100 0 1 99

New Peachtree Rd (West)
New Peachtree Rd (East)

0 Classes (1-3) (4-7) (8-13) Total 0 259 0 2 257
Westbound
Eastbound
0 0 0 0 Volume 2764 37 3 2804 0 0 0 0
71 0 0 71 0 PHF 0.9285 1
89 1 0 90 494 0 7 487
22 0 0 22 651 1 13 637
(1-3) (4-7) (8-13) Total Total (8-13) (4-7) (1-3)
Total 983 1101 0 15 827 259 Total
(8-13) 1 1 0 0 0 1 (8-13)
(4-7) 10 16 0 0 9 7 (4-7)
(1-3) 972 1084 0 15 818 251 (1-3)
Northbound
Clairmont Rd (South)
Packet Pg. 275

3.C.2.e
Chamblee, GA
Bi-Directional Class CountBi-Directional Class Count || NB EB 60min

Chamblee, GA www.marrtraffic.com
Site 4
Clairmont Rd,
north of Dyer Cir Site 4 Date Weather
Clairmont Rd, Tuesday, March 1, 2022 Fair
north of Dyer Cir 55°F
Lat/Long
Lat/Long 33.881037°, -84.309476°
33.881037°, -84.309476°
Date
################### 0000 - 2400 (24h Session) (03-01-2022)
NB EB 60min
Weather
Northbound (Movement 4.1)
TIME Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 7 Class 8 Class 9 Class 10 Class 11 Class 12 Class 13 Total
0000 - 0100 0 59 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69
0100 - 0200 0 38 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
0200 - 0300 0 33 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36
0300 - 0400 0 23 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
0400 - 0500 0 32 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 35
0500 - 0600 0 103 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125
0600 - 0700 0 275 73 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 356
0700 - 0800 1 782 123 8 8 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 933
0800 - 0900 0 1002 120 3 12 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1145
0900 - 1000 1 660 93 5 10 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 775
1000 - 1100 0 538 78 1 16 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 639
1100 - 1200 0 590 104 5 14 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 720
1200 - 1300 0 654 132 1 13 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 807
1300 - 1400 1 595 110 3 7 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 725
1400 - 1500 1 628 123 7 19 4 0 7 1 1 0 0 0 791
1500 - 1600 0 756 128 6 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 907
1600 - 1700 1 820 100 3 12 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 941
1700 - 1800 1 939 112 5 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1068
1800 - 1900 0 772 94 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 878
1900 - 2000 1 591 81 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 677
2000 - 2100 1 427 39 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 471
2100 - 2200 1 265 26 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 296
2200 - 2300 0 163 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 179
2300 - 2400 0 101 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109
Session Total 9 10846 1596 57 155 52 0 16 15 1 0 0 0 12747

Session Average 0.38 451.92 66.50 2.38 6.46 2.17 0.00 0.67 0.63 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 531.13
Session Percentage 0.07 85.09 12.52 0.45 1.22 0.41 0.00 0.13 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
AM Peak Hour 0700 - 0800 0800 - 0900 0700 - 0800 0700 - 0800 0800 - 0900 0700 - 0800 - 0800 - 0900 0600 - 0700 - - - - 0800 - 0900
AM Peak Volume 1 1002 123 8 12 9 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 1145
Noon Peak Hour 1300 - 1400 1200 - 1300 1200 - 1300 1400 - 1500 1400 - 1500 1300 - 1400 - 1400 - 1500 1200 - 1300 1400 - 1500 - - - 1200 - 1300
Noon Peak Volume 1 654 132 7 19 9 0 7 3 1 0 0 0 807
PM Peak Hour 1600 - 1700 1700 - 1800 1500 - 1600 1500 - 1600 1500 - 1600 1500 - 1600 - 1600 - 1700 1600 - 1700 - - - - 1700 - 1800
PM Peak Volume 1 939 128 6 13 4 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1068
Packet Pg. 276

3.C.2.e
Chamblee, GA
Bi-Directional Class CountBi-Directional Class Count || SB WB 60min

Site 4
Clairmont Rd,
Lat/Long
Lat/Long 33.881037°, -84.309476°
33.881037°, -84.309476°
Date
################### 0000 - 2400 (24h Session) (03-01-2022)
SB WB 60min
Weather
Southbound (Movement 4.2)
0000 - 0100 0 50 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55
0100 - 0200 0 21 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
0200 - 0300 0 18 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
0300 - 0400 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 22
0400 - 0500 0 20 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26
0500 - 0600 0 76 8 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 89
0600 - 0700 0 256 50 5 8 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 325
0700 - 0800 0 462 73 14 14 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 567
0800 - 0900 0 554 87 4 12 2 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 665
0900 - 1000 0 538 103 2 24 6 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 676
1000 - 1100 0 518 93 2 25 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 645
1100 - 1200 0 602 101 2 21 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 730
1200 - 1300 0 675 130 5 14 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 830
1300 - 1400 1 726 106 2 19 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 860
1400 - 1500 0 723 88 7 16 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 841
1500 - 1600 2 754 78 11 12 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 863
1600 - 1700 1 812 85 6 10 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 918
1700 - 1800 1 892 68 4 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 972
1800 - 1900 1 909 73 3 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 992
1900 - 2000 0 694 35 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 736
2000 - 2100 1 513 31 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 550
2100 - 2200 0 374 15 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 392
2200 - 2300 1 259 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 272
2300 - 2400 0 111 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117
Session Total 8 10578 1252 77 200 44 2 17 10 0 0 0 0 12188

Session Average 0.33 440.75 52.17 3.21 8.33 1.83 0.08 0.71 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 507.83
AM Peak Hour - 0800 - 0900 0900 - 1000 0700 - 0800 0900 - 1000 0900 - 1000 - 0800 - 0900 0500 - 0600 - - - - 0900 - 1000
AM Peak Volume 0 554 103 14 24 6 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 676
Noon Peak Hour 1300 - 1400 1300 - 1400 1200 - 1300 1400 - 1500 1000 - 1100 1200 - 1300 1200 - 1300 1000 - 1100 1100 - 1200 - - - - 1300 - 1400
Noon Peak Volume 1 726 130 7 25 5 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 860
PM Peak Hour 1500 - 1600 1800 - 1900 1600 - 1700 1500 - 1600 1500 - 1600 1500 - 1600 1500 - 1600 1600 - 1700 1600 - 1700 - - - - 1800 - 1900
PM Peak Volume 2 909 85 11 12 5 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 992
Packet Pg. 277

3.C.2.e
Chamblee, GA
Bi-Directional Class CountBi-Directional Class Count || Bi-Directional 60min

Site 4
Clairmont Rd,
Lat/Long
Lat/Long 33.881037°, -84.309476°
33.881037°, -84.309476°
Date
################### 0000 - 2400 (24h Session) (03-01-2022)
Bi-Directional 60min
Weather
Bi-Directional 60min
0000 - 0100 0 109 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124
0100 - 0200 0 59 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63
0200 - 0300 0 51 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58
0300 - 0400 0 44 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 47
0400 - 0500 0 52 6 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 61
0500 - 0600 0 179 30 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 214
0600 - 0700 0 531 123 5 11 5 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 681
0700 - 0800 1 1244 196 22 22 11 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1500
0800 - 0900 0 1556 207 7 24 7 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 1810
0900 - 1000 1 1198 196 7 34 11 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1451
1000 - 1100 0 1056 171 3 41 8 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 1284
1100 - 1200 0 1192 205 7 35 9 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1450
1200 - 1300 0 1329 262 6 27 9 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1637
1300 - 1400 2 1321 216 5 26 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1585
1400 - 1500 1 1351 211 14 35 9 0 8 2 1 0 0 0 1632
1500 - 1600 2 1510 206 17 25 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1770
1600 - 1700 2 1632 185 9 22 3 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 1859
1700 - 1800 2 1831 180 9 15 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2040
1800 - 1900 1 1681 167 6 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1870
1900 - 2000 1 1285 116 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1413
2000 - 2100 2 940 70 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1021
2100 - 2200 1 639 41 2 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 688
2200 - 2300 1 422 24 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 451
2300 - 2400 0 212 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 226
Session Total 17 21424 2848 134 355 96 2 33 25 1 0 0 0 24935

Session Average 0.71 892.67 118.67 5.58 14.79 4.00 0.08 1.38 1.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 1038.96
AM Peak Hour 0700 - 0800 0800 - 0900 0800 - 0900 0700 - 0800 0900 - 1000 0700 - 0800 - 0800 - 0900 0600 - 0700 - - - - 0800 - 0900
AM Peak Volume 1 1556 207 22 34 11 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 1810
Noon Peak Hour 1300 - 1400 1400 - 1500 1200 - 1300 1400 - 1500 1000 - 1100 1300 - 1400 1200 - 1300 1400 - 1500 1200 - 1300 1400 - 1500 - - - 1200 - 1300
Noon Peak Volume 2 1351 262 14 41 14 1 8 3 1 0 0 0 1637
PM Peak Hour 1500 - 1600 1700 - 1800 1500 - 1600 1500 - 1600 1500 - 1600 1500 - 1600 1500 - 1600 1600 - 1700 1600 - 1700 - - - - 1700 - 1800
PM Peak Volume 2 1831 206 17 25 9 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 2040
Packet Pg. 278

3.C.2.e
APPENDIX C
Volume Development
(Trip Generation & Growth Rate

Analysis)

Packet Pg. 279

3.C.2.e
Attachment: Attachment 4 - Traffic Study (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU
Trip Generation Analysis (11th Ed. with 2nd Edition Handbook Daily IC & 3rd Edition AM/PM IC)
Gwinnett County, GA
Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Trips Total In Out Total In Out
Proposed Site Traffic
220 Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise) 149 d.u. 1,030 69 17 52 85 54 31
822 Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) 4,000 s.f. gross leasable area 398 16 10 6 41 21 20
Gross Trips 1,428 85 27 58 126 75 51

Residential Trips 1,030 69 17 52 85 54 31
Mixed-Use Reductions -40 -1 0 -1 -7 -5 -2
Alternative Mode Reductions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Adjusted Residential Trips 990 68 17 51 78 49 29
Retail Trips 398 16 10 6 41 21 20

Mixed-Use Reductions -40 -1 -1 0 -7 -2 -5
Alternative Mode Reductions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass By Reductions (Based on ITE Rates) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Adjusted Retail Trips 358 15 9 6 34 19 15
Mixed-Use Reductions - TOTAL -80 -2 -1 -1 -14 -7 -7

Alternative Mode Reductions - TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-By Reductions - TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Trips 1,348 83 26 57 112 68 44
k:\amt_tpto\014765001_chamblee residential\03_analysis\intersection volume worksheets\[2022-03-23_chamblee residential_analysis.xlsm]trip generation
Packet Pg. 280

3.C.2.e
Attachment: Attachment 4 - Traffic Study (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU
Growth Rate Table
Source: GDOT Source: GDOT Source: GDOT
Location: Clairmont Rd Location: Clairmont Rd Location: Peachtree Rd
n/o Peachtree Rd s/o Peachtree Rd e/o Clairmont Rd
Route #: 73505 Route #: 515600 Route #: 69205
Route Type: Minor Arterial Route Type: Minor Arterial Route Type: Minor Arterial
Station: 089-3919 Station: 089-3443 Station: 089-3589
Count Year Volume Growth Rate Count Year Volume Growth Rate Count Year Volume Growth Rate
2014 13,200 2014 16,300 2014 8,500
2015 14,200 7.58% 2015 17,500 7.36% 2015 9,150 7.65%
2016 14,700 3.52% 2016 18,100 3.43% 2016 9,450 3.28%
2017 15,600 6.12% 2017 19,200 6.08% 2017 9,850 4.23%
2018 22,900 46.79% 2018 23,800 23.96% 2018 9,830 -0.20%
2019 23,100 0.87% 2019 24,000 0.84% 2019 12,400 26.14%
Avg. 1 Year Rates 2014-2019 11.84% Avg. 1 Year Rates 2014-2019 8.05% Avg. 1 Year Rates 2014-2019 7.85%
Annual Growth
DeKalb County Population Annual Growth (2010-2019): 0.94%
DeKalb County ARC Population Forecast (2015-2050): 1.04%
City of Chamblee Population Annual Growth (2010-2019): 13.25%
CHOSEN GROWTH RATE: 2.0%
Packet Pg. 281

3.C.2.e
APPENDIX D
Intersection Volume Worksheets

Packet Pg. 282

3.C.2.e
INTERSECTION VOLUME DEVELOPMENT

Intersection #1
8th St at Cardwell Rd
AM PEAK HOUR
8th St 8th St Cardwell Rd Parkridge Crescent

Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Description Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right
Observed 2022 Traffic Volumes 51 30 0 1 12 69 127 5 64 0 9 3

Pedestrians 0 0 3 1
Conflicting Pedestrians 3 1 1 3 0 0 0 0
Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Heavy Vehicle % 4% 2% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 2% 2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77
Adjustment 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Adjusted 2022 Volumes 54 32 0 1 13 72 133 5 67 0 9 3
Annual Growth Rate 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%
Growth Factor 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040
New Road Adjustment
Other Development Trips
2024 Background Traffic 56 33 0 1 14 75 138 5 70 0 9 3
Project Trips
Trip Distribution IN 30%
Trip Distribution OUT 30%
Residential Trips 0 0 0 0 0 15 5 0 0 0 0 0

Retail Trips 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0
Total Project Trips 0 0 0 0 0 17 8 0 0 0 0 0
2024 Buildout Total 56 33 0 1 14 92 146 5 70 0 9 3
PM PEAK HOUR
8th St 8th St Cardwell Rd Parkridge Crescent


Pedestrians 2 7 7 2
Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
Heavy Vehicle % 2% 2% 0% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 2% 0% 2% 2%
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Adjustment 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13
Growth Factor 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040
New Road Adjustment
Project Trips

Retail Trips 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0
2024 Buildout Total 26 27 0 3 24 113 104 9 56 0 2 3

k:\amt_tpto\014765001_chamblee residential\03_analysis\intersection volume worksheets\[2022-03-23_chamblee residential_analysis.xlsm]1 3/24/2022 8:15
Packet Pg. 283

3.C.2.e

Intersection #2
Clairmont Rd at New Peachtree Rd
AM PEAK HOUR
Clairmont Rd Clairmont Rd New Peachtree Rd New Peachtree Rd

Observed 2022 Traffic Volumes 21 1,027 192 127 368 42 70 67 11 234 98 176
Pedestrians 0 1 1 0
Heavy Vehicles 0 17 5 4 8 1 2 2 0 16 2 10
Heavy Vehicle % 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 7% 2% 6%
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Adjustment 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Growth Factor 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040
New Road Adjustment
2024 Background Traffic 23 1,122 210 138 402 46 77 73 12 256 107 192
Project Trips
Trip Distribution IN 35% 20% 15%
Trip Distribution OUT 20% 15% 35%

Retail Trips 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 0
2024 Buildout Total 32 1,122 210 138 402 51 88 82 32 256 111 192
PM PEAK HOUR
Clairmont Rd Clairmont Rd New Peachtree Rd New Peachtree Rd

Pedestrians 1 0 1 4
Heavy Vehicles 0 9 8 5 9 1 0 1 0 2 1 4
Heavy Vehicle % 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3%
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Adjustment
Growth Factor 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040
New Road Adjustment
Project Trips

Retail Trips 7 0 0 0 0 4 3 2 5 0 3 0
2024 Buildout Total 40 860 269 314 730 37 83 100 38 269 114 140
Packet Pg. 284

3.C.2.e

Intersection #3
New Peachtree Rd at Vijay Dr/Driveway A
AM PEAK HOUR
Vijay Dr/Dwy A New Peachtree Rd New Peachtree Rd

Observed 2022 Traffic Volumes 160 161

Pedestrians
Conflicting Pedestrians
Heavy Vehicles
Heavy Vehicle % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor
Adjustment
Growth Factor 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040
New Road Adjustment
Project Trips
Trip Distribution IN 30% 70%
Trip Distribution OUT 30% 70%

Retail Trips 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 0
2024 Buildout Total 17 0 40 0 0 0 0 174 8 18 176 0
PM PEAK HOUR
Vijay Dr/Dwy A New Peachtree Rd New Peachtree Rd

Observed 2022 Traffic Volumes 97 137

Pedestrians
Heavy Vehicles
Heavy Vehicle % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Peak Hour Factor
Adjustment
Growth Factor 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040
New Road Adjustment
Project Trips

Retail Trips 5 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 6 14 0 0
2024 Buildout Total 14 0 30 0 0 0 0 113 21 48 143 0

Packet Pg. 285

3.C.2.e
APPENDIX E
Synchro Analysis Reports

Packet Pg. 286

3.C.2.e
HCM 6th AWSC Chamblee Residential

1: 8thStreet/8th Street & Caldwell Road/Parkridge Crescent Existing 2022 PM Peak
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 80 9 54 0 2 3 25 26 0 3 23 95
Future Vol, veh/h 80 9 54 0 2 3 25 26 0 3 23 95
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 84 9 57 0 2 3 26 27 0 3 24 100
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8.1 7.1 7.8 7.5
HCM LOS A A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1

Vol Left, % 49% 56% 0% 2%
Vol Thru, % 51% 6% 40% 19%
Vol Right, % 0% 38% 60% 79%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 51 143 5 121
LT Vol 25 80 0 3
Through Vol 26 9 2 23
RT Vol 0 54 3 95
Lane Flow Rate 54 151 5 127
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.067 0.174 0.006 0.134
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.507 4.17 4.12 3.782
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 799 850 873 930
Service Time 2.507 2.246 2.122 1.879
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.068 0.178 0.006 0.137
HCM Lane LOS A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.6 0 0.5
Kimley-Horn Synchro 11 Report

03/15/2022 Page 1
Packet Pg. 287

3.C.2.e
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Chamblee Residential

2: Clairmont Road & New Peachtree Road Existing 2022 PM Peak
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 71 90 22 259 100 135 15 827 259 302 702 22
Future Volume (veh/h) 71 90 22 259 100 135 15 827 259 302 702 22
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1826
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 76 97 24 278 108 145 16 889 264 325 755 16
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 5
Cap, veh/h 235 187 45 387 300 267 423 1137 337 358 1906 40
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.13 0.54 0.54
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2841 680 1781 1777 1582 1781 2699 800 1781 3558 75
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 76 59 62 278 108 145 16 585 568 325 377 394
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1744 1781 1777 1582 1781 1777 1722 1781 1777 1857
Q Serve(g_s), s 4.6 3.8 4.0 16.5 6.4 9.9 0.6 33.5 33.7 12.6 14.8 14.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.6 3.8 4.0 16.5 6.4 9.9 0.6 33.5 33.7 12.6 14.8 14.8
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 235 117 115 387 300 267 423 749 725 358 952 994
V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.51 0.54 0.72 0.36 0.54 0.04 0.78 0.78 0.91 0.40 0.40
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 262 936 918 477 1181 1051 498 904 876 504 1178 1231
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.5 53.3 53.4 40.3 43.5 45.0 17.2 29.5 29.5 26.1 16.2 16.2
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 3.4 3.8 4.0 1.6 3.7 0.0 5.1 5.3 15.8 0.6 0.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 1.8 1.9 7.6 2.9 4.1 0.2 14.5 14.1 6.4 5.7 6.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 48.3 56.7 57.2 44.2 45.0 48.6 17.2 34.6 34.8 41.9 16.7 16.7
LnGrp LOS D E E D D D B C C D B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 197 531 1169 1096
Approach Delay, s/veh 53.6 45.6 34.4 24.2
Approach LOS D D C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.4 70.0 24.4 13.4 23.9 56.5 12.2 25.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.4 * 6.7 5.4 * 5.6 * 8.6 * 6.7 5.6 * 5.6
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.0 * 78 24.9 * 62 * 25 * 60 8.4 * 79
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 16.8 18.5 6.0 14.6 35.7 6.6 11.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 11.3 0.4 0.7 0.7 14.1 0.0 3.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.9
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

03/15/2022 Page 2
Packet Pg. 288

3.C.2.e

1: 8thStreet/8th Street & Caldwell Road/Parkridge Crescent Existing 2022 AM Peak
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 133 5 67 0 9 3 54 32 0 1 13 72
Future Vol, veh/h 133 5 67 0 9 3 54 32 0 1 13 72
Peak Hour Factor 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 0 2 2 4 2 0 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 173 6 87 0 12 4 70 42 0 1 17 94
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 63% 65% 0% 1%
Vol Thru, % 37% 2% 75% 15%
Vol Right, % 0% 33% 25% 84%
LT Vol 54 133 0 1
RT Vol 0 67 3 72
Degree of Util (X) 0.151 0.326 0.02 0.131
Cap 737 817 776 848
Service Time 2.898 2.426 2.64 2.254
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.152 0.326 0.021 0.132
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 1.4 0.1 0.5

03/15/2022 Page 1
Packet Pg. 289

3.C.2.e

2: Clairmont Road & New Peachtree Road Existing 2022 AM Peak
Lane Configurations
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Cap, veh/h 230 236 39 395 303 270 574 1419 248 242 1681 161
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.05 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.51 0.51
Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3027 499 1711 1777 1582 1781 3023 529 1767 3276 314
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 76 41 42 251 105 189 22 645 648 136 213 219
Q Serve(g_s), s 4.2 2.4 2.5 14.1 5.7 12.3 0.7 33.1 33.4 4.3 7.2 7.3
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.2 2.4 2.5 14.1 5.7 12.3 0.7 33.1 33.4 4.3 7.2 7.3
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.17
V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.30 0.31 0.64 0.35 0.70 0.04 0.77 0.78 0.56 0.23 0.24
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 264 1003 1003 525 1276 1136 655 977 975 540 1273 1299
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 1.2 1.3 1.7 1.4 6.9 0.0 4.5 4.6 2.0 0.3 0.3
LnGrp LOS D D D D D D B C C C B B
Approach LOS D D C B
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes

03/15/2022 Page 2
Packet Pg. 290

3.C.2.e

1: 8thStreet/8th Street & Caldwell Road/Parkridge Crescent No-Build 2024 AM Peak
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 138 5 70 0 9 3 56 33 0 1 14 75
Future Vol, veh/h 138 5 70 0 9 3 56 33 0 1 14 75
Peak Hour Factor 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 0 2 2 4 2 0 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 179 6 91 0 12 4 73 43 0 1 18 97
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM Control Delay 9.7 7.8 8.9 8
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 63% 65% 0% 1%
Vol Thru, % 37% 2% 75% 16%
Vol Right, % 0% 33% 25% 83%
LT Vol 56 138 0 1
RT Vol 0 70 3 75
Degree of Util (X) 0.157 0.34 0.02 0.138
Cap 732 813 769 840
Service Time 2.934 2.449 2.68 2.29
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.158 0.341 0.021 0.139
HCM Control Delay 8.9 9.7 7.8 8
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1.5 0.1 0.5

03/15/2022 Page 1
Packet Pg. 291

3.C.2.e

2: Clairmont Road & New Peachtree Road No-Build 2024 AM Peak
Lane Configurations
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Cap, veh/h 227 237 37 399 309 275 564 1430 250 231 1695 165
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.52 0.52
Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3047 483 1711 1777 1582 1781 3023 528 1767 3272 318
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 79 42 44 261 109 196 23 671 675 141 222 228
Q Serve(g_s), s 4.6 2.6 2.7 15.3 6.1 13.2 0.7 36.2 36.7 4.6 7.8 7.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.6 2.6 2.7 15.3 6.1 13.2 0.7 36.2 36.7 4.6 7.8 7.9
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.18
V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.31 0.32 0.65 0.35 0.71 0.04 0.80 0.80 0.61 0.24 0.24
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 255 967 969 507 1230 1096 642 942 941 513 1227 1252
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 1.3 1.3 2.0 1.5 7.1 0.0 5.5 5.7 2.6 0.3 0.3
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes

03/15/2022 Page 2
Packet Pg. 292

3.C.2.e

1: 8thStreet/8th Street & Caldwell Road/Parkridge Crescent No-Build 2024 PM Peak
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 83 9 56 0 2 3 26 27 0 3 24 99
Future Vol, veh/h 83 9 56 0 2 3 26 27 0 3 24 99
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 87 9 59 0 2 3 27 28 0 3 25 104
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 49% 56% 0% 2%
Vol Thru, % 51% 6% 40% 19%
Vol Right, % 0% 38% 60% 79%
LT Vol 26 83 0 3
RT Vol 0 56 3 99
Degree of Util (X) 0.07 0.181 0.006 0.143
Cap 796 846 867 926
Service Time 2.529 2.269 2.152 1.895
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.07 0.184 0.006 0.144
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.7 0 0.5

03/15/2022 Page 1
Packet Pg. 293

3.C.2.e

2: Clairmont Road & New Peachtree Road No-Build 2024 PM Peak
Lane Configurations
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Cap, veh/h 230 181 43 386 302 269 411 1132 336 368 1954 42
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.14 0.55 0.55
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2840 681 1781 1777 1582 1781 2699 800 1781 3556 77
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 80 62 64 289 112 151 17 608 592 338 392 410
Q Serve(g_s), s 5.2 4.3 4.5 18.5 7.1 11.1 0.7 38.3 38.5 15.7 16.2 16.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.2 4.3 4.5 18.5 7.1 11.1 0.7 38.3 38.5 15.7 16.2 16.2
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.04
V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.55 0.58 0.75 0.37 0.56 0.04 0.82 0.82 0.92 0.40 0.40
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 246 872 856 442 1101 980 482 843 816 462 1098 1147
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 4.0 4.6 6.0 1.6 3.9 0.0 6.9 7.3 20.6 0.6 0.5
LnGrp LOS D E E D D D B D D D B B
Approach LOS E D D C
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes

03/15/2022 Page 2
Packet Pg. 294

3.C.2.e

1: 8thStreet/8th Street & Caldwell Road/Parkridge Crescent Build 2024 AM Peak
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 146 5 70 0 9 3 56 33 0 1 14 92
Future Vol, veh/h 146 5 70 0 9 3 56 33 0 1 14 92
Peak Hour Factor 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 0 2 2 4 2 0 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 190 6 91 0 12 4 73 43 0 1 18 119
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM Control Delay 10 7.9 8.9 8.2
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 63% 66% 0% 1%
Vol Thru, % 37% 2% 75% 13%
Vol Right, % 0% 32% 25% 86%
LT Vol 56 146 0 1
RT Vol 0 70 3 92
Degree of Util (X) 0.159 0.357 0.02 0.165
Cap 722 801 757 838
Service Time 2.995 2.513 2.757 2.31
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.161 0.358 0.021 0.166
HCM Control Delay 8.9 10 7.9 8.2
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 1.6 0.1 0.6

03/24/2022 Page 1
Packet Pg. 295

3.C.2.e

2: Clairmont Road & New Peachtree Road Build 2024 AM Peak
Lane Configurations
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Cap, veh/h 235 210 78 390 309 275 557 1423 249 229 1666 182
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.52 0.52
Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 2510 936 1711 1777 1582 1781 3023 528 1767 3231 353
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 90 58 59 261 113 196 33 671 675 141 225 230
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1763 1683 1711 1777 1582 1781 1777 1775 1767 1777 1807
Q Serve(g_s), s 5.2 3.5 3.8 15.3 6.4 13.4 1.1 36.8 37.2 4.7 8.0 8.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.2 3.5 3.8 15.3 6.4 13.4 1.1 36.8 37.2 4.7 8.0 8.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.20
V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.39 0.42 0.67 0.37 0.71 0.06 0.80 0.81 0.62 0.25 0.25
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 253 957 914 496 1218 1084 635 932 931 507 1215 1235
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh43.9 49.7 49.8 37.5 41.7 44.6 13.8 25.8 25.9 22.9 15.4 15.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 1.7 2.0 2.4 1.5 7.1 0.0 5.7 6.0 2.7 0.3 0.3
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.3 1.6 1.7 6.6 2.9 5.7 0.4 15.6 15.9 1.9 3.1 3.2
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), 10.4
s 65.8 23.2 15.2 15.6 60.6 12.9 25.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax),
10.0s * 78 24.9 * 62 * 25 * 60 8.4 * 79
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1),
3.1s 10.1 17.3 5.8 6.7 39.2 7.2 15.4
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes

03/24/2022 Page 2
Packet Pg. 296

3.C.2.e
HCM 6th TWSC Chamblee Residential

3: Driveway A & New Peachtree Road Build 2024 AM Peak
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 174 8 18 176 17 40
Future Vol, veh/h 174 8 18 176 17 40
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 0 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 25 25 25 25 25
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 2 0 0
Mvmt Flow 696 32 72 704 68 160
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1

Conflicting Flow All 0 0 728 0 1560 712
Stage 1 - - - - 712 -
Stage 2 - - - - 848 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 885 - 125 436
Stage 1 - - - - 490 -
Stage 2 - - - - 423 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 885 - 115 436
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 115 -
Stage 1 - - - - 490 -
Stage 2 - - - - 389 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.9 92
HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT

Capacity (veh/h) 238 - - 885 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.958 - - 0.081 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 92 - - 9.4 -
HCM Lane LOS F - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 8.6 - - 0.3 -

03/24/2022 Page 3
Packet Pg. 297

3.C.2.e

1: 8thStreet/8th Street & Caldwell Road/Parkridge Crescent Build 2024 PM Peak
Intersection
Intersection LOS A
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 104 9 56 0 2 3 26 27 0 3 24 113
Future Vol, veh/h 104 9 56 0 2 3 26 27 0 3 24 113
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles, % 4 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 109 9 59 0 2 3 27 28 0 3 25 119
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
HCM Control Delay 8.5 7.2 8 7.7
HCM LOS A A A A

Vol Left, % 49% 62% 0% 2%
Vol Thru, % 51% 5% 40% 17%
Vol Right, % 0% 33% 60% 81%
LT Vol 26 104 0 3
RT Vol 0 56 3 113
Degree of Util (X) 0.071 0.21 0.006 0.161
Cap 783 831 854 917
Service Time 2.605 2.345 2.217 1.94
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.072 0.214 0.006 0.16
HCM Control Delay 8 8.5 7.2 7.7
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.2 0.8 0 0.6

03/24/2022 Page 1
Packet Pg. 298

3.C.2.e

2: Clairmont Road & New Peachtree Road Build 2024 PM Peak
Lane Configurations
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Cap, veh/h 244 183 66 382 306 273 402 1122 333 367 1905 78
Arrive On Green 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.42 0.42 0.15 0.55 0.55
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 2552 924 1781 1777 1582 1781 2700 800 1781 3479 142
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 89 74 75 289 123 151 43 608 592 338 401 416
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1699 1781 1777 1582 1781 1777 1724 1781 1777 1844
Q Serve(g_s), s 5.9 5.2 5.6 18.7 8.0 11.3 1.7 39.3 39.5 16.3 17.0 17.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.9 5.2 5.6 18.7 8.0 11.3 1.7 39.3 39.5 16.3 17.0 17.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.08
V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 0.58 0.62 0.76 0.40 0.55 0.11 0.82 0.83 0.92 0.41 0.41
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 251 856 818 434 1080 962 471 827 802 452 1077 1118
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh51.1 58.1 58.2 43.6 47.5 48.9 19.7 33.5 33.6 33.1 17.1 17.1
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 4.1 5.0 6.6 1.8 3.7 0.1 7.4 7.8 21.7 0.6 0.6
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.7 2.5 2.6 8.9 3.7 4.7 0.7 17.6 17.3 12.6 6.7 7.0
LnGrp LOS D E E D D D B D D D B B
Approach LOS E D D C
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), 10.4
s 77.4 26.5 14.9 27.4 60.4 13.5 27.8
Max Green Setting (Gmax),
10.0s * 78 24.9 * 62 * 25 * 60 8.4 * 79
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1),
3.7s 19.0 20.7 7.6 18.3 41.5 7.9 13.3
HCM 6th LOS D
Notes

03/24/2022 Page 2
Packet Pg. 299

3.C.2.e
HCM 6th TWSC Chamblee Residential

3: Driveway A & New Peachtree Road Build 2024 PM Peak
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6.4
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 113 21 48 143 14 30
Future Vol, veh/h 113 21 48 143 14 30
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - 0 - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 25 25 25 25 25 25
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 2 0 0
Mvmt Flow 452 84 192 572 56 120
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1

Conflicting Flow All 0 0 536 0 1450 494
Stage 1 - - - - 494 -
Stage 2 - - - - 956 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1042 - 146 579
Stage 1 - - - - 617 -
Stage 2 - - - - 376 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1042 - 119 579
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 119 -
Stage 1 - - - - 617 -
Stage 2 - - - - 307 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.3 43.6
HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT

Capacity (veh/h) 260 - - 1042 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.677 - - 0.184 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 43.6 - - 9.2 -
HCM Lane LOS E - - A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4.4 - - 0.7 -

03/24/2022 Page 3
Packet Pg. 300

3.C.2.f
DeKalb County School District Analysis Date: 4/18/2022

Development Review Comments
Submitted to: City of Chamblee Case #: PZ2022-993

Parcel #: 18-278-03-060 & 18-278-03-121
Attachment: Attachment 5 - Dekalb County Schools Report (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map, Rezoning, DCI)
Name of Development: Vijay Drive
Location: 5007 New Peachtree Road and1100 Vijay Drive
Description: Request to rezone current industrial land to develop 141 townhomes and 8 multi-family units.
Impact of Development: When fully constructed, the townhome units would be expected to generate 26 students: 9 at
Ashford Park Elementary School, 2 at Chamblee Middle School, 4 at Chamblee High School, 2 at
other DCSD schools, and 9 at private schools. The multi-family units would be expected to
generate no students. Enrollment at Ashford Park ES and Chamblee HS is already above capacity,
but the impact of this development is expected to be small.
Ashford Park Chamblee
Elementary Middle Chamblee Other DCSD Private
Current Condition of Schools School School High School Schools Schools Total
Capacity 480 1,080 1,705
Portables 14 0 4
Enrollment (Oct. 2021) 697 968 1,766
Seats Available -217 112 -61
Utilization (%) 145.2% 89.6% 103.6%
New students from development 9 2 4 2 9 26
New Enrollment 706 970 1,770

New Seats Available -226 110 -65
New Utilization 147.1% 89.8% 103.8%
Attend Attend other

Home DCSD Private
Yield Rates School School School Total
Elementary 0.0620 0.0061 0.0185 0.0866
Middle 0.0118 0.0049 0.0212 0.0378
High 0.0319 0.0000 0.0193 0.0512
Total 0.1057 0.0110 0.0590 0.1756
Student Calculations
Proposed Units 8 141

Unit Type Apartments Townhomes
Cluster Chamblee High School
Attend Attend other
Home DCSD Private
Units x Yield School School School Total
Elementary 8.75 0.86 2.61 12.22
Middle 1.66 0.69 2.98 5.33
High 4.49 0.00 2.72 7.21
Total 14.90 1.55 8.31 24.76
Attend Attend other

Home DCSD Private
Anticipated Students School School School Total
Ashford Park Elementary School 9 1 3 13
Chamblee Middle School 2 1 3 6
Chamblee High School 4 0 3 7
Total 15 2 9 26
Packet Pg. 301

3.C.2.g
Projects B-28 | B-29
Attachment: Attachment 6 - MTP Excerpt Project B-28 (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map, Rezoning, DCI)
WESTERN BROOKHAVEN CONNECTIONS
The City has sought expansion of its Keswick
Trail in two separate planning phases:
an immediate extension from Chamblee-
Tucker Road to Chamblee-Dunwoody Way
(referred to as the Rail-Trail Phase 2), and a
more expansive set of short trail alignments addition to numerous other environmental,
crossing the Norfolk Southern rail corridor and economic, and community benefits. Although
providing connections toward Buford Highway the Mobility Plan defines a broader set of trails
and Chamblee's southern neighborhoods. This and paths to connect the entire city, this project
project represents the concept developed is a key active transportation link through one of
in the Phase 2 expansion study, with two its most significant areas of redevelopment and
separate parts: an extension from the existing added density. Allowing more options to make
Keswick T short trips in this area without driving, especially
with the MARTA rail station within close walking
distance, helps Chamblee to achieve a broad set
of environmental and economic objectives.
PROJECT B-28: New Peachtree Road Trail
Recommended Implementation Priority Medium (5-10 Years); project should be

coordinated with City of Brookhaven efforts and
planned and constructed jointly, if possible.
Recommended
Initial EstimatedImplementation
Costs Priority Highest (First
$500,000 Five Years)
(Chamblee connection from B-02/B-03)
Initial Estimated
Potential FundingCost
Sources $5,450,000
Transportation Alternatives Program, LCI
Implementation Funds, City Funds
Potential Funding Sources Transportation Alternatives Program, LCI
Complexity to Implement Moderate, if trail Funds,
Implementation can be Private
fully constructed
Sources within
existing right-of-way
Complexity to Implement Moderate
Key Partnerships and Stakeholders Private Property Owners; Norfolk Southern Railroad
Key Partnerships and Stakeholders Business and Property Owners
Related projects OP-07
Related projects Rail-Trail Phase 3 Expansion Projects, especially
B-17; CS-01
124 Chamblee Mobility Plan

A MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PL AN FOR THE CIT Y OF CH AMBLEE
Packet Pg. 302

3.C.2.g
Attachment: Attachment 6 - MTP Excerpt Project B-28 (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map, Rezoning, DCI)
PROJECT B-29: Brookhaven-Ashford Park Connector
Recommended Implementation Priority Medium (5-10 Years); project should be

coordinated with City of Brookhaven efforts and
planned and constructed jointly, if possible.
Initial Estimated Costs $800,000
Potential Funding Sources Transportation Alternatives Program, LCI

Implementation Funds, City Funds
Complexity to Implement Moderate
Key Partnerships and Stakeholders Private Property Owners; ACOE (for permitting
along stream corridor), City of Brookhaven
B-28 | B-29
Cir
Chamblee
Mc
ood
e rs
ns Ave
Je
te Ct
MARTA Station
Ga
Jeff
C ir
Turnga
wD
Ave
ury
r
t eb
Ga
Flightway Dr
e Rd
tre
ach
Pe
Clairmont Rd
Bozeman Dr
a teRd
Clairwood Ter
Corsair Dr
W in g
Rd
Vijay Dr
ee
htr
eac
Hardee Ave
wP
Ne
8
B-2
Lawson Dr
Rd
ee
Ham Dr
tr
4th St
h
DeKalb-
ac
Dyer Cir
Pe
Peachtree
5th St
B-29
Hickory Rd
8th St Airport
Parkridge Cres
Ca
6th St
nfie
ld D
Jefferson St
r
Parkridge Dr
Sama Cir
n
yL
Knox Ave
Skyland Dr
rre
Park Ln
Su
Rd
Aviation Way
gle
8th
Rin
St
8th St
Airport Rd
Aviation Way
Project to connect
to Brookhaven
125
Packet Pg. 303

3.C.2.h
Packet Pg. 304

Attachment: Attachment 7 - Proposed FLU Map (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map,
3.C.2.i
Packet Pg. 305

Attachment: Attachment 8 - Proposed Official Zoning Map (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map, Rezoning, DCI)
3.C.2.j
CITY OF CHAMBLEE CASE PZ2022-993
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
Attachment: Attachment 9 - Ordinance (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map, Rezoning, DCI)
CHAMBLEE AS PROVIDED IN THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
CHAMBLEE, GEORGIA, APPENDIX A, "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE”,
TITLE 2, "LAND USE AND ZONING”, ARTICLE 2, “AMENDMENTS” TO PROVIDE
FOR REZONING OF A PARCEL FROM ONE ZONING CLASSIFICATION TO
ANOTHER, PORTRAYAL OF SUCH ZONING DESIGNATION ON THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP AND ENTRY IN THE MINUTES OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND FOR ALL OTHER LAWFUL PURPOSES
PART I
BE IT ORDAINED AND IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF CHAMBLEE, GEORGIA that the Official Zoning Map of the City of Chamblee shall be
amended as follows:
To change the zoning classification of the following parcels located in Chamblee, GA from Industrial
Transitional (IT) to Village Residential (VR):
DeKalb County Parcel ID: 18-278-03-060, also known as 5007 New Peachtree Road, Chamblee, GA,
18-278-03-121, also known as 1100 Vijay Drive, Chamblee, GA;
and that such changes be entered on the Official Zoning Map within 30 days after this amendment is
approved and adopted by the Mayor and City Council.
Further, the City Clerk is directed to enter upon the minutes of the Council Meeting at which this ordinance
is adopted the following:
“On ____________________, 2022, by official action of the Mayor and City Council, the following
changes were made to the Official Zoning Map:
The zoning classification of DeKalb County Parcel ID 18-278-03-060, also known as 5007 New
Peachtree Road and 18-278-03-121, also known as 1100 Vijay Drive located in Chamblee, GA was
changed from Industrial Transitional (IT) to Village Residential (VR); subject to the following exhibits and
conditions:
1. __________”
PART II
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Mayor and City Council that the sections, paragraphs,
sentences, clauses and phrases of this ordinance are severable, and, if any phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases,
clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance.
The foregoing was proposed by Council member ____________________ with a motion that the same be
adopted. Said motion was seconded by Council member ___________________. Same was then put to a
Packet Pg. 306

3.C.2.j
vote and ______ Council members voted in favor of the ordinance, and _______ Council members voted
against the ordinance. Said motion was thereupon declared passed and duly adopted this ________ day of
_______________, 2022.
Attachment: Attachment 9 - Ordinance (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map, Rezoning, DCI)
_______________________________
Cherron Bouie,
City Clerk, City of Chamblee, Georgia
Approved this _____ day of ________________, 2022.

_____________________________________
The Honorable Brian Mock
Mayor, City of Chamblee, Georgia
Approved as to form: ____________________________
Keri Ware, City Attorney
First reading: ______________________
Second reading: ____________________
Packet Pg. 307

3.C.2.k
Mayor Brian Mock City of Chamblee
Mr. John Mesa 5468 Peachtree Road
Ms. Leslie Robson Chamblee, GA 30341
Ms. Karen Lupton
Attachment: Attachment 10 - Letters from the Public (3473 : PZ2022-993 - Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use FLU Map, Rezoning, DCI)
Mr. Elmer Veith
Mr. Jimmy Furst
Staff
Re: PZ2022-993 (5007 New Peachtree Rd & 1100 Vijay Drive)
Mr. Mayor, Council, and Staff,
As Chamblee residents and adjacent property owners, we are writing to express our respectful objection to rezoning
application PZ2022-993 as we are unable to attend the May 12th council meeting in person. We understand that Chamblee is
a thriving community and redevelopment of existing industrial zone is inevitable. But after carefully reviewing the re-zoning
application, variances, and plans, our specific objections and concerns are as follows:
- Page 17, Item “B” of the Applicant’s re-zoning application indicates that there will indeed be an impact to schools, but
that the impact will be minimal. The proposed density of 140+ townhomes is objectionable and will inevitably impact
Ashford Park Elementary which is known to be overburdened with students attending class in mobile trailers. Our
primary reason to buy our existing home (1854 Hickory) was to send both our kids to Ashford Park Elementary.
- The applicant’s plans appear to show a large detention pond in the southeast corner of the subject property which
presents a detriment and nuisance to adjacent legacy single-family lots, including ours. Such ponds are often ill-
maintained and harbor mosquitoes and other pests. The applicant’s plans do not address how said pond would be
accessed for proper maintenance.
- The applicant’s plans appear to show demolition of mature 24”-30” hardwoods along the perimeter of the site which
could arguably be saved and incorporated into their site plan. A tree protection plan indicating recompense was not
included in the re-zoning application. One of the primary reasons for us to buy the existing property (1854 Hickory)
was the tree cover in adjacent to our property. Our backyard has a steep hill and demolition of the trees in the
adjacent property will cause major soil erosion and highly increase the risk of flooding of my backyard and the house.
- The applicant’s plans appear to show demolition of a wooded area at the southwest portion of the subject property.
This wooded area is known to house Barred Owls which can be seen and enjoyed by neighbors on Hickory Road with
regular frequency.
- The proposed southern buffer of 20’ is insufficient consolation for the demolition of the existing wooded area which
serves as a buffer from the current industrial uses on Vijay Drive.
- The applicant’s plans indicate retaining walls along the south and east boundaries that appear to be 40’+ in height
and face adjacent properties. These walls are unsightly and a detriment to adjacent legacy single-family lots. While
existing site grades fall from front to back, the walls depicted are arguably unnecessary in the specified height to
achieve a feasible site.
- The applicant’s plans appear to show non-compliance with side setbacks, encroaching on the west and east setbacks.
- The application indicates that a traffic study has been provided, but none was included in the application package on
the City’s website. The plans indicate 322 proposed parking spaces which will inevitably burden New Peachtree,
Clairmont Road, 8th Street, and Caldwell Road. The impact to 8th Street and Caldwell Road are concerning due to the
residential nature of those streets and poor sightlines on Caldwell Road.
In summary, we respectfully object to the applicant’s density, large retaining walls, demolition of wooded buffer, lack of
sufficient buffer between adjacent legacy single-family, and impact to local schools and traffic/roads. Thank you for accepting
our letter and for your service to the City of Chamblee.
Respectfully,
Ashish Jain & Nisha Jaichand

1854 Hickory Road, Chamblee, GA 30144
ashish.uga@gmail.com; 910.922.1921
Restricted Information and Basic Personal Data Packet Pg. 308

3.C.2.k
Mayor Brian Mock City of Chamblee
Mr. John Mesa 5468 Peachtree Road
Ms. Leslie Robson Chamblee, GA 30341
Ms. Karen Lupton
Mr. Elmer Veith
Mr. Jimmy Furst
Ms. Selena Xayavong
Chamblee Planning Staff
Re: PZ2022-993 (5007 New Peachtree Rd & 1100 Vijay Drive)
Mr. Mayor, Council, and Staff,
As Chamblee resident and adjacent property owner, I am writing you to respectfully express my
objection to rezoning application PZ2022-993 as I am unable to be present at the May 12th, 2022 Council
Meeting. Chamblee is a thriving community and we’re seeing redevelopment of our industrial uses into
more beneficial product types. While redevelopment is inevitable, thoughtful and compliant
redevelopment is prudent. After reviewing the re-zoning application, variances, and plans, my specific
objections are:
- The applicant’s plans indicate retaining walls along the south and east boundaries that appear to
be 40’+ in height and face adjacent properties. These walls are unsightly and a detriment to
adjacent legacy single-family lots. While existing site grades fall from front to back, the walls
depicted are arguably unnecessary in the specified height to achieve a feasible site.
- The applicant’s plans indicate that three story townhomes will be located atop the 40’+
retaining walls placing roof lines some 50’-70’+ higher than adjacent legacy single-family lots.
- The applicant’s plans appear to show non-compliance with side setbacks, encroaching on the
west and east setbacks.
- The applicant’s plans appear to show a large detention pond in the southeast corner of the
subject property which presents a detriment and nuisance to adjacent legacy single-family lots.
Such ponds are often ill-maintained and harbor mosquitoes and other pests. The applicant’s
plans do not address how said pond would be accessed for proper maintenance.
- The applicant’s plans appear to show demolition of mature 24”-30” hardwoods along the
perimeter of the site which could arguably be saved and incorporated into their site plan. A tree
protection plan indicating recompense was not included in the re-zoning application.
- The applicant’s plans appear to show demolition of a wooded area at the southwest portion of
the subject property. This wooded area is known to house Barred Owls and hawks which can be
seen and enjoyed by neighbors on Hickory Road with regular frequency.
- The proposed southern buffer of 20’ is insufficient consolation for the demolition of the existing
wooded area which serves as a buffer from the current industrial uses on Vijay Drive.
- Page 17, Item “B” of the Applicant’s re-zoning application indicates that there will indeed be an
impact to schools, but that the impact will be minimal. The proposed density of 140+
townhomes is objectionable and will inevitably impact Ashford Park Elementary which is known
to be overburdened with students attending class in mobile trailers.
- The applicant’s plans appear to show a 42” RCP storm line and 30” PVC overflow which
discharge into a state water per DeKalb GIS information. The increased pervious surface and
Packet Pg. 309

3.C.2.k
lack of water quality devices are of concern with regard to this state water which flows into
Ashford Park.
- The applicant’s plans appear to show sanitary sewer exiting the site via an existing 8” DIP line
which passes through a residential lot owned or controlled by the Seller. An existing residential
structure is located on this lot and no known sewer easement exists across this site (lot 10). This
presents questions as to the size and condition of the existing line and the lines located on
Hickory Road.
- The applicant’s site plan appears to show one means of entry/egress from the property which
appears to be in non-compliance with 2018 IFC Appendix D, Section D106 which requires
multifamily projects having more than 100 units to be equipped with two separate and
approved fire apparatus access roads. Additionally, Section D107 requires developments of one
or family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 to be equipped with two
separate and approved fire apparatus access roads.
- The application indicates that a traffic study has been provided, but none was included in the
application package on the City’s website. The plans indicate 322 proposed parking spaces which
will inevitably burden New Peachtree, Clairmont Road, 8th Street, and Caldwell Road. The
impact to 8th Street and Caldwell Road is concerning due to the residential nature of those
streets and poor sightlines on Caldwell Road.
In summary, I respectfully object to the applicant’s proposed density, large retaining walls, demolition of
wooded buffer, lack of sufficient buffer between adjacent legacy single-family, and impact to local
schools and traffic/roads. Thank you for accepting my letter and for your service to the City of
Chamblee.
Respectfully,
Ryan L. Garrett
1860 Hickory Road
Chamblee, GA 30144
678.223.5677
Atlestimator@gmail.com
Packet Pg. 310

Chamblee Townhomes

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chamblee Townhomes

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

3.C.

SUBJECT: PZ2022-993 - CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES AND MIXED-USE FLU MAP,

Meeting Date: May 17, 2022, 7:30 PM

Packet Pg. 164

Packet Pg. 165

Attachment 4 - Traffic Study (PDF)

Packet Pg. 166

CHAMBLEE TOWNHOMES AND MIXED-USE BUILDINGS –FUTURE LAND USE

Project Name: Chamblee Townhomes and Mixed-Use Buildings

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Therefore, Staff recommends DENIAL of the application package.

Character Area and Future Development Map:

History of the Property:

Description of the Proposed Project:

Applicable UDO Standards:

Future Development Map Amendment Criteria:

• Market the area for mixed-use redevelopment and economic investment.

Zoning Map Amendment Review and Approval Criteria:

DCI Review and Approval Criteria:

c. Such conditions are peculiar to the particular piece of property involved;

Applicant’s Concurrent Waiver Requests:

Other Staff Input:

Economic Development: No comment.

• Recommend continuation of sidewalk from townhomes to new Peachtree Road (or

Design Review Board Comments and Recommendations:

South end of property abutting residential properties

Back of property, facing North on Vijay Dr

Townhomes and retaining wall west of property

A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPED BY

Packet Pg. 187

GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22

GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22 1

GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22 2

GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22 3

GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22 4

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS THE

OFFICIAL ZONING MAP

Brawley Cir MU-BC MU-BC

307 308 309

Br Buena Vista Ave

Durd ton lmar D

CVC Corridor Village Commercial

141 VC Burk Ter

MU-BC Mixed Use - Business Center 13

NC-1 Low-Density Neighborhood Commercial

NC-2 Medium-Density Neighborhood Commercial

NR-1 Neighborhood Residential 1

PUD Planned Unit Development

Pre sid ential Pkwy

TOD Transit-Oriented Development

Runway Protection Zones (Location approximate, based upon CAD data) CC R CC

Rail Trail Overlay

GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22

Ter W Hardee Ave n ar e

2. UTILITIES MAY EXIST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

3. WHERE EXISTING RUNOFF LEAVES THE SITE IN A SHEET FLOW

BOCA RATON, FL 33486

No. ISSUANCE AND REVISION DESCRIPTIONS

PROJECT STREET ADDRESS, PROJECT CITY STATE ZIP

PARCEL ID: XXX-XX-XXXXX

GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22 6

Packet Pg. 195

GROVER CORLEW ACQUISITIONS LLC | 04.11.22 8

2. CRITICAL SPOT GRADES ARE TO PAVEMENT GRADE UNLESS