Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment 1: Case Study-Tata Steel
Assessment 1: Case Study-Tata Steel
There are various environmental assessments for assessing environmental impact and the
need for sustainability. These are Life cycle assessments (LCA), carbon footprint analysis,
CSR reports, VOC testing, environmental risk assessment, etc. However, Life cycle
assessment and carbon footprint analysis are two of the most common evaluations used for
assessing environmental impact and providing a business with information about creating
greener systems. Following is the distinction between the two assessments:
A carbon footprint analysis evaluates the greenhouse gas emissions caused by the
manufacture of a product or any given activity that contributes to global warming.
This can be done with the assessment of emissions of carbon, sulfur hexafluoride,
and methane. Whereas, a life cycle assessment (LCA) systematically evaluates
multiple environmental impacts of a product, activity, or process over its whole life
cycle.
Three core standards around carbon footprint analysis are the GHG Protocol, ISO/TS
14067, and PAS 2050. The GHG Protocol is the most frequent international tool used
by business leaders and governments to comprehend, quantify, and control GHG
emissions. Whereas, the core standards around LCA are ISO 14044 and ISO 14040.
The multiple assessment divisions under LCA include natural resource depletion,
climate change, ecosystem degradation, and human health.
Carbon footprint analysis is a mono-criterion analysis focused on only one
environmental impact i.e. climate change by GHG emission. On the other hand, LCA
takes environmental releases including GHG and all other material inputs throughout
the life cycle into account and estimates all the probable direct and indirect impacts
on the environment.
Hence, Life cycle assessment is a more accurate type of analysis than carbon footprint.
The contribution of Tata Steel to sustainable and ethical business practices are:
(a) Health and Safety: Tata Steel believes in promoting a safe working environment across
the organization and has taken the onus of being a role model to showcase the
paramount importance of workplace safety, which is embedded as a core value in its
culture. It also conferred the Safety and Health Excellence recognition 2016 in the
'Leadership' category by the World Steel Association.
(b) Employer of Choice: Tata Steel is aimed at developing a culture of care, commitment,
engagement, and harmony across the workforce. There is an increased focus on
encouraging diversity, through the inclusion of women, underprivileged sections of the
community, and specially-abled people.
(c) Innovation: Apart from leveraging the technological capabilities to address inferior
quality of indigenous raw material and the inconstancy of domestic ore in comparison
with imported raw materials, Tata Steel continuously yearns to be at the high end of
technological capabilities and strives to meet superior product requirements as and
when the evolving demand for newer, high-strength grades of steel arises.
(d) Environment Leadership: Tata Steel yearns to be the Indian steel industry benchmark
for environmental performance by concentrating on climate change mitigation and
resource efficiency. The key natural resources on which its affairs are primarily
dependent are: coal, iron ore, water, and ferroalloys.
5. If Tata Steel was operating in Australia, what environment regulations
will apply to the company?
While operating in Australia, Tata Steel has to keep in mind all the environmental
regulations and manage the environmental impact by following:
A. Manage energy use: Depending on business size and activities, energy costs can take up
a large part of a budget. By making some changes in the workplace, a business can
reduce its energy use. Energy can be used effectively by:
Comparing energy contracts to make sure a business is getting the best value.
Using energy-efficient equipment.
Improving to build energy efficiency.
Generating energy on own.
B. Manage business waste: Waste management is not only good for the environment; it
can also benefit a business’s reputation and save money. Waste of a business can be
managed effectively by:
Assessing the lifecycle of products and services.
Measuring business waste.
Reducing, reusing, recycling.
Managing hazardous waste.
Checking waste management rules in a state or territory in which a company is
operating.
C. Manage water use: Conserving water is not only good for the environment but also the
business’s bottom line. By simply managing the runoff of water on a building site, or
recycling the water use, a company can significantly reduce its water bills. The water use
in a business can be managed by:
Monitoring water usage and creating a benchmark.
Identifying any leakage.
Using water effectively
Checking state and territory water rules because each state and territory have
unique water resources and information.
A company can also find support in the form of a water ombudsman and grants and
fundings.