Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Tutorial 8: Search for political stability / Approaches to Governance

 Was there political stability in independent Southeast Asia?

What is political stability? How do you measure political stability? What do you need to see in a country for you
to say that there is political stability?

Definition:

Evaluate whether the following countries have political stability across time. Do not narrate the entire political-
history of the country. Looking at the history of the country pick out different pieces of facts that will
substantiate one or two main points that summarises the political-history of that particular country. (Two
examples have been modelled for you)

Malaysia (~75%)
Popular support for government Demonstrations in society against government
Peaceful transition of governments  Konfrontasi launched by Indonesia but did not
 National Alliance formed in 1953 and included greatly affect political stability of Malaysia as
three main ethnic groups there was strong support and assistance from
o National Alliance won the first federal the British Commonwealth, Australia, New
elections in 1955 Zealand, etc
 Barisan Nasional formed in 1973 as a broad  Socio-economic disparity led to 1969 race riots
coalition including previous opposition and the openness of democracy contributed to
groups created stability as disagreements were it
away from the public  Led to banning of sensitive topics such as
 Over the years opposition parties, such as PAS Malay privileges, citizenship criteria, etc
and DAP, have gained influence but they  Military and security apparatus increasingly in
remain committed to winning power through the hands of the Malay majority
peaceful constitutional means

Strong economic growth


 In the early years under National Alliance

1
Singapore

Philippines

2
Myanmar

Indonesia (~40%)

3
Thailand (~30%)
Popular support for government Attempted coups against government
 Semi-democracy with rise of Prem in 1970s  1932 bloodless coup against absolute
 Prem restored and consolidated democracy in Monarchy
Thailand with support of the Monarchy and  Military coup in 1957 led by Sarit that
people overthrew Phibun
 American support gave some legitimacy to  Thanom and Praphat exiled by the King in
various governments due to their anti- 1973 due to corruption and rising living cost
communist commitment  1973-76 chaotic democratic experiment
 1976 saw return to authoritarian military rule
Strong economic growth until 1970s
 At various times after WWII due to US
economic and military assistance, with
Thailand being the main anti-communist US
ally in mainland Southeast Asia

HOT (higher order thinking) questions…


The varying extents to which respective Southeast Asian governments succeeded in asserting political
stability thus depends on?

You might also like