RECAHRGEABLE AND REMOTE CONTROLLED FLOOR SWEEPER

BAGATUA, Nedrie C.
COMIA, Reign Assley Faye A.
DIO, Jane Mclean R.
PALENZUELA, Zsanea Adrienne F.
PANTALLA, Annelle Patricia L.
VIDALLON, Reymund A., Jr.

A RESEARCH PAPER PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY

OF SIPOCOT NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
SIPOCOT, CAMARINES SUR

IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR

SPECIAL SCIENCE CURRICULUM OF
SIPOCOT NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

JULY 2021
 CHAPTER IV

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

This chapter presented the analysis and interpretation

of the data and the determined level of acceptability and

effectivity of Rechargeable and Remote Controlled Floor

Sweeper.

Level of Acceptability of the Rechargeable and Remote

Controlled Floor Sweeper in terms of size, weight, and

durability

The acceptability level of the Rechargeable and Remote

Controlled Floor Sweeper was determined using the average

weighted mean on the three parameters, namely: size, weight,

and durability. In identifying the level of acceptance for

the size, the height of the product should not exceed 12.0

centimeters and its length and width below 35.0 centimeters.

For the weight, the mass should be less than 1 kg, and as for

durability, all parts of the product should still be intact

after shaking it for 30 seconds.

Based from the table, the exact height of the product is

9.3 centimeters, which passed the estimated height of less

than 12.0, and attained a total weighted mean of 5.00,

therefore, was highly acceptable. The actual width of the

product was 32.5 centimeters and the length is 34,5

centimeters, and had total weighted mean of 4.88 which fell

under the range of 4.21-5.00, which denoted an indication of

highly acceptable. Additionally, the mass of the sweeper was

0.75 kg, and had a total weighted mean of 5.00, which

implicated highly acceptable.

Table 2. Tallied Results for the Acceptability of the

Rechargeable and Remote Controlled Floor Sweeper

Indicators Weighted Mean Descriptive Rating

1. Is the height
of the product 5.00 Highly Acceptable
accepted?
2. Is the width of
the product 4.88 Highly Acceptable
accepted?
3. Is the length
of the product 5.00 Highly Acceptable
accepted?
4. Is the weight
of the product 5.00 Highly Acceptable
accepted?
5. Is the product
still working
after it was 5.00 Highly Acceptable
shaken for 30
seconds?
Total Weighted
4.98 Highly Acceptable
Mean

Legend:
4.21 – 5.00 = Highly Acceptable (HA)
3.41 – 4.20 = Acceptable (A)
 2.61.0 – 3.40 = Moderately Acceptable (MA)
1.81 – 2.60 = Slightly Acceptable (SA)
1.00 – 1.80 = Not Acceptable (NA)

Overall, the product was rated by the respondents as

highly acceptable with a total weighted mean of 4.98.

This data implied that the first part of the survey-

questionnaire satisfied the objectives of the study in terms

of acceptability, thus, the Rechargeable and Remote

Controlled Floor Sweeper is acceptable in terms of size,

weight and durability. This study proved that the product is

easy and comfortable to use.

This affirmed the Floor Sweeping Theory which explained

that the size, weight and appearance of the broom must be

suitable for easy, comfortable and steady use since the

results proven the acceptability of the product.

Level of Effectiveness of the Rechargeable and Remote

Controlled Floor Sweeper in terms of controllability,

ability to collect waste and efficiency

The effectivity level of the Rechargeable and Remote

Controlled Floor Sweeper was determined using the average

weighted mean on the three parameters, namely:

controllability, ability to collect waste, and efficiency. In

identifying the level of acceptance for the controllability,

the product should be able to move in all directions and for

the ability to collect waste, the product should be able to

collect all the given sizes of wastes. As for efficiency, the

product should be able to sweep small particles such as dust

and sand without residues.

Table 4 depicts the results gathered to suffice the

objectives of the study in terms of effectivity of the product

in three parameters.

Table 3. Tallied Results for the Effectivity of the

Rechargeable and Remote Controlled Floor Sweeper

Indicators Weighted Mean Descriptive Rating

1. Is the product
5.00 Highly Effective
controllable?

2. Is the sweeper
effective in terms
of collecting 4.12 Effective
lightweight waste
materials?

3. Is the sweeper
efficient in terms 4.08 Effective
of sweeping dust?

Total Weighted
4.40 Highly Effective
Mean

Legend:
4.21 – 5.00 = Highly Effective (HE)
 3.41 – 4.20 = Effective (E)
2.61.0 – 3.40 = Moderately Effective (ME)
1.81 – 2.60 = Slightly Effective (SE)
1.00 – 1.80 = Not Effective (NE)

In terms of controllability, it was shown in the table

that the product has a total weighted mean of 5.00 for having

been able to move in all directions, thus, denoting an

indication of highly effective. The sweeper collected two out

of three sizes of lightweight waste; hence, the implication

was effective. For being able to sweep dust but with little

residues and for having a total weighted mean of 4.08 which

fell under the range 3.41-4.20, the product was denoted

effective in terms of efficiency.

With a total weighted mean of 4.40, which fell under

that range 4.21-5.00, the sweeper was classified as highly

effective in terms of its effectivity.

This implied that the Rechargeable and Remote Controlled

Floor Sweeper satisfied the objectives of the study in terms

of effectivity. This study proved that the Rechargeable and

Remote Controlled Floor Sweeper is effective in terms of

controllability, ability to collect waste and efficiency

through the use of characterized mechanisms and a remote

control system.
 Therefore, the words of Swarup (2015), about the

conclusion that a floor cleaner is a system that enables

cleaning of the floor by the help of highly stabilized and

rapidly functioned electronic and mechanical control system,

was upheld.

The researchers concluded that the Rechargeable and

Remote Controlled Floor Sweeper is an effective machine in

removing wastes on flat surface.