Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2005 Kodera - Determination of Free Chlorine Based On Anodic Voltammetry Using Platinum, Gold and Glassy Caron Electrodes
2005 Kodera - Determination of Free Chlorine Based On Anodic Voltammetry Using Platinum, Gold and Glassy Caron Electrodes
Received 4 February 2004; received in revised form 24 January 2005; accepted 24 January 2005
Available online 19 February 2005
Abstract
The oxidation of free chlorine on platinum, gold, and glassy carbon disk electrodes has been investigated by using anodic voltammetry to
determine the free-chlorine concentration. The voltammetric curves exhibited well-defined anodic peaks. The influences of pH, free-chlorine
concentration, and potential sweep rate on the electrode response were investigated. The results show that the measurement of the oxidation
peak current can be used as the basis for a simple, accurate, and rapid method for the determination of ClO− , within a concentration range of
4–400 mg Cl l−1 . The results of this method were in good agreement with those obtained by iodometric titration. Differential pulse voltammetry
has also been examined, resulting in an improved sensitivity at a concentration of 1.0 mg Cl l−1 .
© 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0003-2670/$ – see front matter © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.aca.2005.01.053
294 F. Kodera et al. / Analytica Chimica Acta 537 (2005) 293–298
Here, we note the anodic reaction [14–20]. The overall sizes, 3 M Co), carefully sonicated in water, and then rinsed
anodic reaction can be expressed as follows. with water. The polished electrode was then pretreated in an
In basic region (pH > 8.5): electrolytic solution by a potential sweep in the conventional
manner [21,22].
6ClO− + 3H2 O → 2ClO3 − + 4Cl− + 6H + + 3/2O2 + 6e− ,
(3) 2.4. Measurement procedure
and in acidic region (pH < 5.5): A background voltammogram was measured in the elec-
− − +
6HOCl + 3H2 O → 2ClO3 + 4Cl + 12H + 3/2O2 + 6e . − trolytic aqueous solution, then each amount of the free-
chlorine solution was pipetted into the solution. The deter-
(4) mination of free-chlorine concentration was carried out by
using for the anodic reaction at 25 ± 1 ◦ C. The measurement
To the authors’ knowledge, no report regarding an analytical
was carried out after the addition of the free-chlorine solution
method utilizing this reaction has been published.
in 1 h to prevent the decomposition of free chlorine. All ex-
The present work presents an attempt to examine the use
periments were performed under a non-deaerated condition.
of anodic voltammetry for the quantitative determination of
free chlorine. This information is important for the evalu-
ation of the direct use of voltammetry in actual analytical
3. Results and discussion
situations. Furthermore, we have also examined the use of
differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) which is useful for the
3.1. Pt electrode activation
low concentration determination.
The application of large potential excursions to noble-
metal electrodes has long been known to result in repro-
2. Experimental
ducibly clean and reactive electrode surfaces. Virtually ev-
ery publication on voltammetric data for noble-metal elec-
2.1. Reagents
trodes briefly describes a protocol for an electrode pretreat-
ment applied to maintain electrode activity and ensure repro-
A standard free-chlorine solution was prepared by dilut-
ducible data. Most commonly, the pretreatment involves the
ing a sodium hypochlorite aqueous solution (Nakarai, Japan).
application of repeated cyclic potential scans or alternated
The concentration of the solution was determined by iodo-
positive and negative potential pulses. Such electrochemical
metric titration [5]. Sodium perchlorate (Merck, Germany)
treatments for maintaining the optimal activity of Pt elec-
was used as a supporting electrolyte. All reagents were of
trodes have been reported elsewhere [23–25]. In this study,
analytical grade and were used as received. Water was ob-
the surface of the working electrode was polished with pol-
tained from a Milli-Q Labo purification system (Millipore,
ishing films. The polished electrode was then pretreated in
Japan). The pH was measured with a conventional glass elec-
an electrolytic solution by repeating cyclic potential scans
trode system (HORIBA, F-12, Japan).
from the oxygen evolution potential to the hydrogen gener-
ation potential. The influence of the activation on the cyclic
2.2. Instrumentation voltammograms at the Pt electrode is shown in Fig. 1: (a) is
3.3. Effect of Ph
Fig. 3. Cyclic voltammograms at (A) Au and (B) GC disk electrodes in 0.1 M NaClO4 as a function of free-chlorine concentration: (a) 140 mg Cl l−1 , (b)
70 mg Cl l−1 , and (c) blank. Sweep rate: 50 mV s−1 .
ined. The voltammogram for the change of the sweep rate is coefficient, R2 = 0.9997. The good linearity and the zero in-
shown in Fig. 5, and the inset shows the anodic peak current tercept indicate the reaction takes place diffusion controlled.
versus the square root of the sweep rate plots. It was found A shift in the peak potential with an increase in sweep rate
that the peak current is linearly proportional to the square root was observed, which means the electrode reaction is not re-
of the sweep rate, within the range 10–300 mV s−1 . A linear versible [27]. Djordjević et al. reported that during the initial
regression statistical analysis (y = ax) yielded a correlation step, a neutral radical is formed by the one-electron oxida-
tion of ClO− [17]. The radical reaction can be expressed as
follows:
ClO− → ClO• + e− . (7)
To estimate the number of electrons, n, transferred during
the electrode process, we performed measurements of the
stationary diffusion-controlled limiting current, Id , at the Pt
microelectrode as a function of free-chlorine solution, and
applied the following equation [28]:
Id = 4nFC∗ Da, (8)
where a is the radius of the disk electrode, F the Fara-
day constant, D the diffusion constant, and C* is the bulk
Fig. 4. Effect of pH on the oxidation of free chlorine: (a) linear sweep voltam- Fig. 5. Linear sweep voltammograms of 200 mg Cl l−1 free chlorine in
mograms of 50 mg Cl l−1 free chlorine in 0.1 M NaClO4 at Pt electrode; (b) 0.1 M NaClO4 for various sweep rates: (a) 10 mV s−1 , (b) 50 mV s−1 , (c)
Ip vs. pH plots of the 200 mg Cl l−1 free chlorine in 0.1 M NaClO4 at GC 100 mV s−1 , (d) 200 mV s−1 , and (e) 300 mV s−1 at Pt electrode. Insert
electrode. Sweep rate: 50 mV s−1 . shows a plot of the anodic peak current vs. the square root of sweep rate.
F. Kodera et al. / Analytica Chimica Acta 537 (2005) 293–298 297
voltammetry based on platinum, gold, and glassy carbon disk [10] A. van den Berg, M. Koudelka-Hep, B.H. van der Schoot, N.F. de
electrodes. These electrodes exhibit a clear voltammetric re- Rooij, E. Verney-Norberg, A. Grisel, Anal. Chim. Acta 269 (1992)
sponse to ClO− . A good linear relationship was obtained 75.
[11] H. Iketake, A. Yamada, Bunseki Kagaku 48 (1999) 1123.
between oxidation peak current and concentration, and the [12] K. Nagashima, H. Furui, M. Ejiri, N. Nakano, Bunseki Kagaku 51
repeatability was also found to be good. Thus, it is apparent (2002) 1175.
that this method can be adapted for application in a monitor- [13] J. Jin, Y. Suzuki, N. Ishikawa, T. Takeuchi, Anal. Sci. 20 (2004)
ing instrument for high free-chlorine concentrations in dis- 205.
[14] F. Foerster, E. Muller, Z. Elektrochem. 8 (1902) 8, 515, 633,
infection, bleaching, and various manufacturing processes.
921.
Moreover, by employing the DPV method, the detecting limit [15] T.S. Filippov, Y.V. Dobrov, Elektrokhimiya 5 (1969) 984.
was enhanced to 1.0 mg Cl l−1 . [16] N. Ibl, D. Landolt, J. Electrochem. Soc. 115 (1968) 713.
[17] A.B. Djordjević, B.Ž. Nikolić, I.V. Kadija, A.R. Despić, M.M. Jakšić,
Electrochim. Acta 18 (1973) 465.
References [18] H. Yoshida, T. Akazawa, T. Haneda, Denki Kagaku 41 (1973) 68.
[19] A. Tasaka, T. Tojo, J. Electrochem. Soc. 132 (1985) 1855.
[1] H. Galal-Gorchev, Pure Appl. Chem. 68 (1996) 1731. [20] L. Czarnetzki, L.J.J. Janssen, Electrochim. Acta 33 (1988) 561.
[2] K.R. Solomon, Pure Appl. Chem. 68 (1996) 1721. [21] S. Shibata, M. Sumino, Denki Kagaku 37 (1969) 336.
[3] J. Fauvarque, Pure Appl. Chem. 68 (1996) 1713. [22] W.R. LaCourse, D.C. Johnson, Anal. Chem. 65 (1993) 50.
[4] APHA, AWWA, WCCF, Standard Method for the Examination of [23] D. Clark, M. Fleishman, D. Pletcher, J. Electroanal. Chem. 36 (1972)
Water and Wastewater, 18th ed., 1992 pp. 4–36. 137.
[5] G.C. White, Handbook of Chlorination, 2nd ed., Van Nostrand, Rein- [24] A. MacDonald, P.D. Duke, J. Chromatogr. 83 (1973) 331.
hold, New York, 1986. [25] W. Stulik, V. Hora, J. Electroanal. Chem. 70 (1976) 253.
[6] J. Simper, Product Finish 50 (1997) 4. [26] J.C. Morris, J. Phys. Chem. 70 (1966) 3798.
[7] H.C. Marks, J.R. Glass, J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 34 (1942) 1227. [27] A.J. Bard, L.R. Faukner, Electrochemical Methods, Wiley, New York,
[8] A.N. Tsaousis, C.O. Huber, Anal. Chim. Acta 178 (1985) 319. 1980.
[9] S. Uchiyama, O. Hamamoto, S. Suzuki, Electroanalysis 1 (1989) [28] T. Abe, K. Itaya, I. Uchida, K. Aoki, K. Tokuda, Bull. Chem. Soc.
323. Jpn. 61 (1988) 3417.