Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GDTM - Team 9
GDTM - Team 9
COMMERCIAL DISPUTE
RESOLUTION IN
VIETNAM
Group 9
Pham Thi Phuong Mai
Dao Phuong Mai
Phan Thuy Trang
Members
Bui Thi Quynh Anh
Dao Xuan Minh
Vo Duc Anh
TEAM 9 Ngo Thi Minh Phuong
Tran Ngoc Bao Tram
Le Hong Nhung
Le Hai Ha
TABLE OF CONTENT
Group 9
OVERVIEW
International Commercial
Disputes
Group 9
Overview
Categories of International Commercial
Disputes
Group 9
INTERNALTIONAL
COMMERCIAL
DISPUTE
RESOLUTION IN
VIETNAM
Dispute resolution
Conciliation
Conciliation is a method of dispute resolution
with the participation of a third party as a
conciliator to assist and persuade the
disputing parties to find solutions to
eliminate the arising dispute.
1. Conciliation Agreement
Dispute 2. Appointment of conciliator
resolution
3. Rights and obligations of the disputing
parties in the conciliation process
4. Order and procedures for conciliation
Conciliation 5. Conciliated Settlement Agreement
6. Conciliated Settlement Agreement
Procedure
recognition
7. Termination of conciliation process
Group 9
Conciliation
Advatages Disadvantages
Time-saving Delivering injustice.
Low cost Depends on the
Have the right to choose agreement of the parties
conciliator/location Not mandatory
Little harm to the
cooperation between two
sides
Confidential
Dispute resolution
Arbitration
Arbitration is a private dispute resolution
process that parties may choose as an
alternative to going to court.
In Vietnam today, arbitration is being widely
applied. The Vietnamese government has
established the Vietnam International Arbitration
Center (VIAC).
Vietnam
The reality of international trade in Vietnam
shows that every year the number of disputes
resolved by international arbitration in Vietnam is
increasing.
The beginning of the arbitration involves one
party giving notice to another of their intent to
arbitrate a dispute
Dispute The other party then gets a period of time to
Group 9
Arbitral proceedings
and an arbitral award
are more confidential
and flexible
Arbitration
Cost
Disavantages
Arbitration decision
cannot be easily
overturned
CASE 1:
Group 9
Case 1
Parties
Claimant: U. Company (Philippines)
U
Respondent: D. Steel Joint Stock Company (Vietnam)
D
Third party (Arbitration): ICC
?
Case content
Company U (Requester) in the Philippines and Steel
Company D (headquartered in Vietnam) Sign a contract to
buy and sell 6000 tons of steel on 12/06/2017 with a contract
value of 2.430. 000 USD.
During the performance of the contract, D Steel Company
did not deliver the goods according to the quantity and time
limit specified in the Sales Contract.
Group 9
Case 1
proceedings:
arbitrator, the arbitration proceedings and the content of the
claim of Company U.
+) There is only one arbitrator
Case 1
19/10/2018, ICC claim
+) The failure to deliver goods according to the correct
quantity and time limit stated in the contract of Company D
is a breach of the contract.
+) The judgment forces Company D to pay compensation for
Team 9
Litigation
Process
Group 9
Litigation
Advatages Disadvantages
Group 9
Case 2
Parties
Plaintiff:
G
“G” Synchronous Generator Manufacturing Company;
N
(China)
“N” Investment and Development Joint Stock
Company (Vietnam)
Defendant :
“D” Construction and Materials Investment Joint
Stock Company (Vietnam)
(Abbreviation : DC)
D
Case content
Company G and company N signed contract with
Company DC on the provision equipment and technical
services for LaLa hydropower plant. Company DC
(buyer) had to pay company G and company N $565.790
and $204.239 respectively
Group 9
Executing contract:
- Last batch delivered in Oct 2012
- Oct 2012: Lala hydropower plant operated.
- Company DC just paid G Company 95% of
contract value; paid Company N 90% of the
contract value
- Nov 2012 - Apr 2013: G-N repeatedly
requested company DC to perform its
obligations
=> DC avoided and refused to pay debts
Process
The litigation
lasted for 6 years,
from 2014 to 2020
Forcing Company DC to make the
payment to Company G without
NOVEMBER 2, 2015
O C T O B E
R 3 1 , 2 0 1 4 OCTOBER 19, 2016
Company G and company N filed a lawsuit asking It was decided to cancel the first-instance
Company DC to make payment with interest of judgment and transfer the case file to the
15,5%/year first-instance Court for re-settlement.
Process
Forcing Company DC to make the payment to Company The defendant Company
G without interest and to Company N with interest. DC filed an appeal against
Forcing Company G and company N pay the repair cost paying interest to
for company DC Company N.
Group 9
RECOMMENDATION
Group 9
Vietnamese the judicial system is somewhat
lacking in experience and development of
complex commercial litigation skills and
procedures. Lengthy and complicated
judicial procedures also discouraged people
to seek judicial remedies.
However, the Vietnamese judicial system
has been undergoing substantial
reorganization and has developed very
rapidly.
THANKS!
Q&A PART
Group 9