Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ALM Gifted Education Article
ALM Gifted Education Article
I
t was a perfect time and place. In the fall She was also organized and sequential, and was truly developed by and for the gifted.
of 1973, Arvada West High School teach- she appealed to successful gifted students. Betts and Kercher (1999, p. 14) state that
ers and administrators, in Arvada Col- Having two teachers with different content “an autonomous learner, by definition, is
orado, wanted to meet the needs of all areas, learning styles, and experiences proved one who solves problems through a combi-
their students. The principal was the school’s to be one of the major keys to the success of nation of divergent and convergent think-
leader for change. Task forces were formed, this approach. ing, and functions with minimal external
parents and students were consulted, and A new project was developed at Arvada guidance in selected areas of endeavor.”
topics centered around necessary changes West that targeted achieving and non-achiev-
to enhance education. ing students. Jolene and I had a new chal- Standards of the Autonomous Learner
I was hired to teach students who were not Model for the Gifted and Talented
succeeding in school. My background is in The Standards of the Autonomous Learner
psychology and counseling. On my contract Model (Betts & Kercher, 1999) are funda-
it stated that one of my assignments was to mental to the program and underlie the basic
work with “disenchanted students.” I had no principles for optimizing ability. The aim is
idea who they were or where to find them. to:
My task was to locate students who were • develop self-concept and positive self-
dropping out of school, and those who esteem
weren’t passing classes. The main problem • comprehend one’s abilities in relation to
was that the students were not physically at self and society
school, but were either in the park, at home, • develop skills to interact effectively with
or at the local Burger King. peers, siblings, parents, and other adults
After the students returned to school, an • increase knowledge in a variety of areas
alternative program was developed which
was designed to facilitate their total growth,
“Our approach didn’t • develop critical and creative thinking
skills
work at first, and
not just as students but throughout life. The • develop decision-making and problem-
approach worked. Students began in this everyone struggled. The solving skills
two-hour program and then started taking • integrate activities which facilitate the
appropriate classes from selected teachers. students didn’t like the cognitive, emotional, social, and physi-
We learned how to modify our teaching to cal development of the individual
freedom and we didn’t
meet the needs of the students. • develop individual passion area(s) of
We found many different types of non- learning
achieving students. Some were in special
think they were gifted!
” • demonstrate responsibility for self learn-
education and others had developed attitudes ing in and out of the school setting
that did not allow them to be successful. But lenge in teaching, something we had never • ultimately become responsible, creative,
some were especially intriguing. They were encountered before: we were instructed to independent, life-long learners
bright but not achieving. They loved to learn, modify the system, not the students; to
but not what was being taught at school. develop the program with the students, not for Basic Principles of the Autonomous
At the same time the administrative lead- them; and to be facilitators of learning and Learner Model for the Gifted and Talented
ers were now learning about new concepts not dispensers of knowledge. The Autonomous Learner Model (Figure 1)
concerning gifted children and gifted edu- This new style of teaching was foreign to (Betts, 1985; Betts & Kercher, 1999) was
cation. They hired the National/State Lead- both the students and us. Our approach did- developed based on information gathered
ership Training Institute for the Gifted and n’t work at first, and everyone struggled. from many sources. These included consul-
Talented (1976–78) to provide on-going staff The students didn’t like the freedom and we tation with national leaders, reviews of per-
development for school personnel in the dis- didn’t think they were gifted! But the prin- tinent literature, the training of teachers, and
trict who were interested in learning more cipal stated that the program would con- most importantly, the experiences of learn-
about the gifted. tinue, so we all persevered. ers, teachers, administrators, and parents
The principal encouraged participation By the second year, the students and who worked together to build a new approach
of teachers and administrators in this project. teachers had learned to work together. The which would meet the diversified needs of
A mathematics teacher, Jolene Kercher, was students were taking ownership of their learn- learners. The basic principles of the
selected for this project. She worked not ing. As they assumed this new role, the teach- Autonomous Leaner Model include:
IND
• Social skills are developed and enhanced. Intelligence & Creativity
Group Building Activities
Inter
IVID
• The regular classroom is the central support of program-
Y
Self/Personal Development
ming.
TUD
/Intr
Program & School
UAL
• Pull-out and resource programs and special courses are nec- Opportunities &
a Pe hnology r
ts
HS
Responsibilities
Grou l Projec
Colle lveme
Orga oductiv
essary components.
Men rojects
DEV
Tec
rson
Invo onal Ski
Pres rships
tions
EPT
• Curriculum is differentiated by teachers.
niza
ge & nt
Pr
ent
al Le
idua
• Curriculum is differentiated by learners.
E
pP
enta
ssm
ti
IN-D
LOP
to
C
• Curriculum is based on the interests and passions of learn-
arnin
Indiv
aree
Asse
ers. AUTONOMOUS
ity
MEN
g Sk
• Learners are involved in guided open-ended learning expe- LEARNER
lls
MODEL
ills
T
riences.
• Responsibility for learning is placed on learners. F ns
Pr utur atio ns
i
• Experiences which allow students to become life-long learn- Co oble stic r
plo ati tie
o s
G
Ad en
n tro
m
at Ex stig ctivi
ers are needed. va era vers ic e A
nc l i Inv ral ice ips
• Teachers are facilitators of the learning process, as well as dis- I
ed nte l a ltu rv Tr
SE Cu Se ure T
pensers of knowledge.
M
Kn res
ow t en
t EN
IN led v HM
• Learning is integrated and cross-disciplinary. A ge Ad IC
• Learners develop a broader foundation of basic skills. RS R
EN
• Higher-level, critical, and creative thinking skills are inte-
grated, reinforced, and demonstrated in the learning process.
• Learners develop appropriate questioning skills.
• Varied and divergent responses are sought from learners. Figure 1. Autonomous Learner Model (1996 by George Betts & Jolene
Kercher)
• Content topics are broad-based, with emphasis on major
themes, problems, issues, ideas, and topics. In 1996, the Autonomous Learner Model (Figure 1) was evaluated
• Time and space restrictions for schools are removed for in- and revised to better meet the diversified needs of the gifted and talented.
depth learning. The model contains five major dimensions:
• Learners develop new and unique products.
• Learners use varied resources in the development of in-depth Dimension One: Orientation
studies. This dimension of the model is crucial to the development of the
• Cultural activities and enrichment provide new and unique autonomous learner because basic information is presented as the foun-
growth experiences. dation for understanding self, the importance of working as a group, the
• Seminars and in-depth studies are essential components of process of lifelong learning and what is available for the development
the learning process. of the total individual. This dimension contains four areas:
• Mentorships provide adult role-modeling, active support,
and individual instruction and facilitation. Understanding giftedness, talent, intelligence, and creativity. Many stu-
• Completions and presentations of in-depth studies are inte- dents, educators, and parents do not fully comprehend the concepts of
gral in the learning process. giftedness, talent, intelligence and creativity. Theories and definitions
• Assessment of self-development and learner-created products of these concepts are presented to the students, followed by discussions
is necessary and worthwhile. and activities.
A major unit in this area is entitled “Night of the Notables.” It is
New principles are added as they are discovered through based on Images of Greatness, by Katha Williams (1989). In this unit
involvement in the program. After studying the basic principles, students select people who they believe are gifted and have become
either alone or in small groups, educators, parents, and learners producers of knowledge. After they make their selections, the students
should review each principle and ask the following questions: Is complete research about their people, develop bio-riddles, construct
this included in our approach for the gifted and talented? Why learning centers, and actually become their people for the “Night of
or why not? Should this principle be included in our approach? the Notables,” complete with costume. Teachers, families, and mem-
Why or why not? How will our approach for gifted education be bers of the community are invited to spend the evening with these
modified to include learning through this principle? esteemed people.
During a recent “Night of the Notables” at Brentwood Middle
The Autonomous Learner Model for the Gifted and Talented School, Greeley, Colorado, students chose an eclectic array of people
Since the first publication of the Autonomous Learner Model by for their projects—from athletes and celebrities to scientists and states-
Betts and Knapp in 1981, the model has been well received. “The men. From Albert Einstein and Mahtma Ghandi, to Sally Ride and
goal of the model is to facilitate the growth of students as inde- Thomas Jefferson, students played their parts demonstrating their
pendent, self-directed learners, with the development of skills, con- research results.
cepts, and positive attitudes within the cognitive, emotional, The students complete a final activity. They present their own def-
social, and physical domains” (Betts & Kercher, 1999, p 43). inition of what it means to be gifted. Their final product may be oral,
LE
ITY
Needs Assessment
AR
Group building activities. The ALM is established to fos- Personalized
TIV
lan ing
NI
ter students in their ability to work together effectively Educational Plan
rn
sm ct iting)
N
ati Thi ving
Pro cision Think
as a group. Group process, group roles, and group strate- Interpersonal
De ture
GS
ve
ses oje Wr
ri
OD
Skills
Fu
gies are essential in this area of Orientation. According
Thi king
Pro sion
P
KIL
PR
nt
n
to Virginia Satir, a world-renowned family therapist,
n
kin
s
e
Pa
LS
g
“The non-cognitive comes before the cognitive.” The stu-
l
ua
dents learn group-dynamic skills and how to facilitate
al,
a positive, nurturing environment. INDIVIDUAL
DEVELOPMENT
Go hort Term nt
Self-personal development. How do you describe
ftw rs
OR
*S
Tim
So pute
al Ter
* L anag ment
ng
are
Life
yourself? What is your self-concept and self-esteem?
e M nag
Se m
GA
rni
CD rnet
o
g D lti-M M
n
nce dia
ttin
Do you understand your own gifts and talents or are you
Lea
M
Co
Lon Mu RO
GY
NI
e
a
e
Int
g
more in tune with your weaknesses? How will you
ZA
LO
e
Explorations
e
me
develop your abilities in the next few years after school?
ista
TIO
NO
Investigations
These and many others questions are explored and
NA
CH
Planning
answered at this point in the model. Understanding of
LS
TE
Selections
self may lead to a better development of ability and Participation
KIL
potential.
LS
Program and school opportunities and responsibili- COLLEGE & CAREER
ties. Time is spent learning and discussing the INVOLVEMENT
Autonomous Learner Model. It is essential that the Figure 3. Individual Development Dimension of the ALM
learners comprehend the model and can provide infor- (1996 George Betts & Jolene Kercher)
mation about the model for their teachers and parents.
Without a clear understanding of the ALM, students do a facilitator of learning. The ideal student is both a student and a learner. The
not understand the direction and the journey of life-long ideal teacher is both a dispenser of knowledge and a facilitator of the learning
learning. process.
There is an important distinction in terminology in Another goal of this area of Orientation is to let students know how they can
the ALM. Students must comprehend the difference be involved in the school and community for the next three years. A Program
between the terms student and learner, and teacher (dis- Search is completed by the staff and formulated for the students. It contains ALM
penser of knowledge) and facilitator (facilitator of the courses, content classes, advanced placement and honors courses, competitions,
learning process). This transition process begins in Ori- special school and community events, and resource people (for possible men-
entation and is not completed until learners are involved torships). At the end of this segment of Orientation, students are responsible for
in the Seminars and In-Depth Study dimensions (Figure developing the first draft of their own three-year personal educational plans. The
2). In the Orientation dimension, the students are students plans are presented to the teacher and a small group of students, and reviewed
and the teachers are dispensers of knowledge. The roles every semester.
change as students progress through the different dimen-
sions until the student becomes a learner and the teacher Dimension Two: Individual Development
The second dimension of the ALM is Individual Development (Figure 3) which
was designed to give students the appropriate skills, concepts, and attitudes nec-
TEACHER
essary for their development as life-long learners. This dimension contains six
TEAC DENT/LE
STUDENT
specific areas:
STU
HER
FACI NER
TOR
/FAC RNER
LIFE
from Orientation. The development of self-concept and self-esteem, as well as
ILITA
A
LONG
the development of the skills to interact effectively with others is an on-going
TOR
LEARNING
pursuit. Therefore, the authors of the ALM include this area in Dimension Two
T
LE EN as well as in Dimension One.
FA AR TUD CHER
CIL NE S
ITA R R/ TEA
TO RNE OR/
R A T Learning skills. The learning skills area of Individual Development focuses on
LE ILITA
FA
C the skills necessary to function as an autonomous learner. Study skills are
more individualized while specific math skills are content specific. Bloom’s Tax-
onomy (1974) is included as a basis for teaching thinking skills. Additional
Figure 2. Changing Roles Within the ALM approaches include critical and creative thinking, and problem-finding and
(1999 ALPS Publishing) problem-solving.