Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ead519 Topic6 Casestudydresscode Munderhill
Ead519 Topic6 Casestudydresscode Munderhill
Michael Underhill
8. Action steps (2-5) for implementing your solutions, including a timeline for each
step
Step 1: Create a needs assessment and determine the infractions that need to be addressed when
the policy is re-written. (2 weeks prior to meeting with behavior committee)
Step 2: Devise a plan to create the new policy and brainstorm consequences. (Meet with
committee 2 consecutive weeks to finalize wording of policy)
Step 3: Present final policy to board and wait approval (next board meeting after policy has been
written)
Step 4: Share new policy language with staff and clarify any expectations that the staff might
have questions about. (Next PD session)
Step 5: Include policy and consequences in updated handbook and pass out to teachers/ students
and parents. (Start of new school year/ registration)
9. Potential moral and legal consequences of each solution
The biggest ethical or legal battle with the solution I have selected is the assistant
principal following the appropriate steps to ensure the new dress code policy does not come off
as a uniform policy as that would need to be an entire district decision. Although there are
certainly some grey areas when it comes to student expression and clothing, maintaining the
safety of the students and everyone in the school would outweigh the risk a potential issue.
Rationale
The solution to this problem is to have the assistant principal take the appropriate steps in
re-writing the 10-year-old dress code policy that is causing such a headache. There are several
alternative steps that could be taken but I have outlined a sequential step process that would
ensure that the new policy is ready to go before the start of the new school year. This solution
considers addressing the main problem at hand, which is two-fold. You have the actual dress
code policy itself, and you also have the accountability and process of what happens after a
teaching staff writes a student up for not being compliant. Each action step outlines a specific
step/action that needs to be addressed and is free from any sort of bias or unfairness towards a
specific demographic of students. The staff and leadership team have already identified that the
issue stems from the original policy and from the steps that follow once a student has been
“dress-coded” by a teacher. The needs assessment is given to provide the teaching body with a
voice on how consequences are handed out and who is tasked with doing so. Lastly, the solution
promotes collaboration at different levels within the building. First, if the policy is followed
correctly by the teaching staff, there is a line of communication existing between the staff and
the students who walk into their classrooms. Expectations are set and teachers are to hold the
students to those expectations and call them out when they fail to comply. Secondly, there is a
collaboration piece with the staff and administrators who are overseeing the write-up process.
Lastly, there is also a piece where administrators and other leaders in the building can
communicate and work together to ensure that the tracking aspect of the dress code violation is
documented correctly.
References