Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

1. In the matter of smt.

Nilabati Behera Alias Lalit Behera vs state of Orissa38 and ors police man
brutally beating a man in police custody with their lathis. So, it admitted by court given blow
on vital part of body is sufficient caused to death.
2. Further in the matter of Anusuiya Daharwal v. Govind Ram39 M.P. High Court stated that a
lathi is not a dangerous weapon. therefore, the size, sharpness, would throw light on the
question weather weapon was a dangerous or deadly weapon or not.
3. It cannot be accepted that use of wooden lathi and this weapon which likely to cause death and
it depend on the manner of use of the wooden lathi
4. The Supreme Court has reiterated that, even in a case of death by a single blow but on the
vital part of the body the case may fall under section 302 of the IPC. This statement given by
bench comprise by SC court with Justice MR. Shah and Justice AS Bopanna while listen
matter of appeal filled by State of Madhya Pradesh against the conviction of 302 of IPC.

38
AIR 1993 SCR (2) 581

39
Ansuiya Dharwal v. Govind Ram Jan 11, 2017, MP. High Court

40
Supreme Court Reiterated both matter of Para 1&2 of both cases

MEMORIAL BEHALF OF RESPONDENT

You might also like