Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2007543466microsoft Word - IJSR25
2007543466microsoft Word - IJSR25
1ab
Msc of Mechanical Engineering, PayvaranParsian engineering co
ABSTRACT
Bearing clearance is one of the most important parameters in the operation of a bearing. Therefore, it’s important to determine the installed
clearance space along with the bore contour and concentricity to the outside fit diameter.A method of calculating the clearance space in a
tilting padjournal bearing is presented, together with supporting measureddata.Three distinct stages of journal position have been
identified. Inthe first stage, the journal can move outwards towards the gap between any two of the stationary, untitled pads until it makes
contact with their running surfaces. In the second stage, the shaft can move further outwards, as the pads tilt without sliding until the pad
pivot, the journal center and the contact point between pad and journal become collinear. In the third and final stage, the pads slide
circumferentially around the bearing homing without further tilting, until contacting their pad stops, thereby allowing further outward
motion of the journal. Any or all of these three stages can co-exist to provide the complete clearance space.At the heart of the method of
calculation is an expression for the clearance space as a linear combination of the pad tilting angle, pre-set and journal center coordinates.
For a large scale model of a typical bearing, the shaft excursion distance at the end of the second stage was calculated lo be 32 mm, which is
very close to the observed value of 33 mm. Comparitions are also made between predicted and measured clearance space for a 60 mm
diameter shaft in a tilting pad bearing. The ability of a pad to slide in the circumferential direction suggests that, if sufficiently large, pad-
stop clearance could have some influence on bearing performance.
KEYWORDS : Clearance Space, Tilting Pad Journal Bearing, Oil Film Thickness, Pad Tilt Angle
The measurement of the clearance space inside a tilting pad a fair degree of accuracy. Armentrout and Paquette
journal bearing (TPJB) is more complex than that of its plain (1)presented a very simple method of calculation for a TPJB
counterpart. This is mainly because the pads can tilt about with non-sliding pads, but without taking into account the free
their own pivots and, in the non-rotating condition. The shaft movement of the shaft before it touched the pads. This paper
can only attain a stable equilibrium position when it is in an presents details of a more rigorous method of calculation,
inter-pad gap. If a clearance circle is defined for a TPJB as one together with supporting measured data. The new method will
with radius equal to the clearance (Cr) at the pivotal location, also be applicable to pads which can slide along the bearing
then the shaft center can be moved beyond this circle in the housing as well as tilting about their pivots.
inter-pad gap direction by a certain fraction of Cr. As the Analysis of the clearance space is facilitated by separating
factors that affect the static and dynamic behavior of the it into three stages of possible combinations of journal center
bearing, e.g. the maximum stress on a pivot, depend on the and pad positions. All three stages can co-exist in an
pad tilt angle which in turn depends on the size of the shaft operational bearing.
excursion distance, it is desirable to be able to estimate it with
Y2= Rp.cosγ – PA.cosα
OIL FILM THICKNESS
Figure 1 shows a journal, whose center has translated a
distance Yj, i.e. from 0 to J in the direction (+Y) of an inter-pad
gap, whereas Xj remains zero at all times. Figure 1 also shows
the ith pad tilted to φi.
The vector JQ’, from J to any point Q' located by the angle α
+ β on the surface of the ith pad is given by:
Xi +X2 i -Xj
JQ' = (1) Figure 1.The geometry of two adjactment pads In a
Yi +Y2 i -Yj
tilting pad Journal bearing, showing the tilt angle of
Where:
X1= Rp.cosγ – OP.cosα the ith pad (exaggerated).
X2= PA.sinα – Rp.sinγ
Y1= Rp.sinγ – OP.sinα
__________________________________
1
Corresponding author
ALI ABASABAD ARAB AND MOHAMMAD ABASABAD ARAB : ANALYSIS OF A TILTING PAD JOURNAL BEARING'S CLEARANCE
And the distance AA' is neglected because it is very small This equation is used in the following sections to
compared to all 'the other dimensions involved, and iis develop expressions and data for the three stages involved
assumed to be small enough that putting in calculating the clearance space.
does not introduce significant errors. The oil film thickness H
at any point Q' is defined as:
MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS
First Stage of Journal Motion
This can be shown to have the following non
non-dimensional As regards the motion of a journal towards an inter-pad
inter gap
form (2): starting from the concentric position, by symmetry it is only
necessary to concentrate on one of the two pads, the ith pad.
Assuming that, for this initial stage, i = 0 and that i remains
zero
ero throughout, during this first stage of journal translation
the oil film thickness is given by:
Using a typical value, f =1, corresponding to Pr= 1/2, film thickness profiles are obtained and shown in Fig.2 for a range of values
of yj. It can be seen that h is positive everywhere for yj ≤ 1.1. Moreover, h would become negative for some values of β when yj is
much greater than 1.1, which is clearly inadmissible. In fact
fact,, as shown below, the shaft comes into first contact with a pad at a point on
the pad given by β = 18.9" when yj = 1.103. Any further advancement of the shaft will cause the pad to tilt, i.e. i ≠ 0, and Eq. [4] will
no longer be applicable.
The condition for this initial contact is given by the minimization of y, under the constraints of h = 0 and i=0, i.e. when:
Where:
Some results for β1 and γl are given in Table 1, obtained with a that Eq. [6] depends only upon the angle α and pre-set
pre ratio Pr
typical value of α = 54°, σ = 0.5 mm, RB= 42.0 mm and RG= Since:
38.0 mm, for various values of the pre-set.
set. It should be noted
d 2 yJ cos β1 The value of yl given by Eq. [6] is, indeed, the minimum.
2
= γ1 + f >0 [6a] Table 1 shows that contact will occur at one edge of the
dβ sin γ1
pad, i.e. at β1= 30°, when:
Pr =P*r = cos (α+30°)/ cos α=0.1778
If Pr<P*r , then β1> 30°, and Eqs. [5a]-[6a] are no longer y3 in Table 1, for Pr=0.0 and 0.1, have been adjusted to allow
valid because the minimum occurs outside the range of β. In for this slight complication. For the sake of simplicity, the case
this case the journal can, in fact, move a little more towards of Pr<P*r will be omitted in the following analysis.
the pads before touching their surfaces. The results yl, y2 and
α = 30° , Pr = ½ , RB = 42mm
Pr f β1 y1 y2 y3
0.0 0.00 30.00 1.006 1.166 1.168
0.1 0.11 30.00 1.020 1.199 1.201
0.1778 0.22 30.00 1.034 1.230 1.231
0.2 0.25 29.25 1.039 1.230 1.232
0.3 0.43 25.84 1.059 1.232 1.234
0.4 0.67 22.40 1.081 1.233 1.236
0.5 1.00 18.91 1.103 1.233 1.238
0.6 1.5 15.35 1.126 1.234 1.240
0.7 2.33 11.70 1.150 1.234 1.241
0.8 4.00 7.97 1.177 1.234 1.242
0.9 9.00 4.06 1.205 1.234 1.244
SECOND STAGE OF JOURNAL MOTION outward, it causes the pad to rotate, and hence the point of
For the next stage of the journal motion, i.e. for yJ>yl, and contact to shift to a new position given by the value of β at
i ≠ 0, Eq. [3] must be used. As the journal moves further which h = 0, i.e.
(f + yjsinα) cosβ = 1+f - (rB i + yJcosα)sinβ [7]
y1 = 1+1- cos β1 f
sin γ1 9
Which is exactly the same as Eq[6]. Equating first order terms -2η sin α
ξ= [10]
gives:
1+f sin β1
rB i = -Cη [9a]
Again, for the same typical bearing, the above becomes ξ=
Where C is a constant. Here, for the same typical example, -2.5η for the ithpad. Hence ξmust be negative, i.e. the point of
given that α = 54°, Pr = 18.9° and P, = 0.5, then since C > contact moves towards the pivot. Under this condition, the
and η > 0, one has i< 0, i.e. the ith pad tilts in the clockwise clearance space is therefore given by:
direction as expected. Equating second order terms gives:
h=1+[1- cos
β-ξ f-yJ sin
α+β-ξ+Cη sin (β-ξ) [11]
And the point of contact between journal and pad is - Pads i and i + 1 can only slide circumferentially outwards
almost back to being adjacent to the pivot point, i.e. β=0. - There is very little additional tilting of the pads
- The shaft remains in contact with each pad very near the pad
THIRD STAGE OF SHAFT MOTION center, i.e. β = 0
- The axis of the ith pad moves clockwise (α decreases),
In a typical TPJB there is a pad-stop stop between each whereas that of the (i + l)th pad moves counterclockwise (α
adjacent pair of pads. To allow free play of the pads, there is increases)
some circumferential clearance (σ) of the order of 10 Cr. It - there is a very short transitional stage during which the
follows that a pad can slide circumferentially around the contact point between the shaft, t, and the pad moves from β ≈
bearing housing, thus enabling the journal to travel further 2° to p ≈ 0°, and this transitional stage can be neglected with
outwards. This is the characteristic feature of Stage 3. only a small loss of accuracy.
A large scale model comprising two pads, a journal and Considering the ith pad and using the above observations, it
bearing outer ring, was constructed to facilitate understanding follows that the clearance profile should be basically the same
of the possible
ble stages of journal motion within the clearance as it was at the end of the second stage, except that α should be
space. For Stage 3, the observations are that: modified to become K + α, where K is to be found by the
Indian J.Sci.Res.1(2) : 165-172, 2014 - 168 -
ALI ABASABAD ARAB AND MOHAMMAD ABASABAD ARAB : ANALYSIS OF A TILTING PAD JOURNAL BEARING'S CLEARANCE
Which is simply Eq. [11] evaluated at the end of Stage 2. Figure 3. Compartion of meusred
eusred and calculated clearance
From observation (c), one has h = 0 at β= 0, and Eq. [15] profile at λ=0.04 in stage 2, λ<λmax
therefore becomes:
VALIDATION
Large Scale Model
Figure 5.Compartion
Compartion of meusred and calculated clearance
profile at λ=0.04 in stage 3, λ <λmax
because of the configuration of the test rig which was built COMPARISON WITH OTHER PUBLISHED
several years ago for completely
letely different purposes. DATA
In compartion, the range predicted for this typical bearing,
with α = 54° and Pr = ½, is 1.0 to 1.238 Cr, as listed in Table 1. Armentrout
out and Paquette (1) describe a TPJB wherein the
Assessment of the quality of this agreement must take account pads are supported on flexural pivots. Their paper contains a
of the fact that the difference between
etween 1.3 and 1.238 Cr is only short section in which the largest possible pad tilt angle is
2.8 pm. possible effects which are not incorporated in the evaluated in order to determine the maximum stress on the
theoretical treatment, e.g. manufacturing imperfections and pivot. They give a very simple
imple geometrical derivation of the
distortion of the various elements under load, become maximum pad tilt angle and journal translation distance. The
significant at this order of magnitude. free movement of the shaft before it touches the pads has not
aximum possible journal center translation, y3,
The maximum been taken into account.
depends on the pad-stop stop clearance. In the typical bearing The new method can be applied to the situation in Ref. (1)
examined, this pad-stop
stop clearance is relatively small, and its except that Stage 3 does not exist, and there is no movement
contribution to the third stage translation is therefore rather of the pivot point as the pad tilts, i.e. K = 0, and S=0.
insignificant. However, designers should note that if a larger Applying these conditions, a comparison between the
pad-stop
stop clearance is employed, then a correspondingly larger results calculated by the two different methods, where
Stage 3 contribution would arise, and so would have a greater possible, is shown in Table 3. Goodagreement is shown for Y2
influence on the bearing characteristics. (or y2). However, Eq. [9] in the present method, when
evaluated at η = η2, gives a much lower pad tilt angle than that
given in Ref. (1).
Application of the new technique to the situation Ref. (1) demonstrates the versatility engendered by the incorporation there in of a
multi-stage approach.
• Stage 3-pads slide circumferentially without The pad circumferential sliding clearance could, if sufficiently
further tilting. large, have an influence on the between-pad performance.
Designers could usefully incorporate Eqs. [6], [14] and
The validity and accuracy of the quantities provided by the those leading to λmax to quickly determine the maximum
theoretical method were specifically checked against readings increase in magnitude of the clearance space beyond
taken from a large two-dimensional scale model. Furthermore, Cr(nominal clearance radius in the inter-pad direction),
results obtained from a typical bearing mounted in a test rig thecorresponding maximum pad tilt, and hence the
also supported the findings of the mathematical treatment. maximumstress likely to act on a pad pivot.
Table 4. Nomenclature
point of contact between pad and outer
A, A' Rp radius, pad machined running surface
ring, i = 0, i ≠ 0 respectively
clearance at pad pivot point = RP - OP
Cr RG radius, pad outer surface
– RJ
f Pr/(1 - Pr) S RG/ (RB – RG)
non-dimensional oil film thickness= H xJ , non-dimensional coordinates of J , xJ =
h
/ Cr yJ XJ/Cr, yJ = YJ/Cr
H oil film thickness XJ,YJ coordinates of J
J Journal center α angular coordinate, pad central axis
K modification to a in Stage 3 β angle subtended at P by A and Q
Pr pre-set ratio = (Rp - Rj - Cr)/(Rp - Rj) γ α+β
center, pad machined running surface, non-dimensional journal translation in
P, P' η
i = 0, i ≠ 0 respectively Stage 2
arbitrary point on pad running surface, angular change in pad pivot point during
Q, Q' θ
i = 0, i ≠ 0 respectively Stage 2
non-dimensional bearing housing non-dimensional journal translation in
rB λ
radius= RB/Cr Stage 3
RB radius, bearing housing σ pad-stop clearance
RJ radius, journal i tilt angle of ith pad
Hasanzadehbecause of selfless effortsand for their support and
encouragement and also all the my staff in PayvaranParsian
Acknowledgements.First of all,I must my gratitudefor my Engineering co (PTEDco) and their valuable comments.
parents and family for their efforts against me. I would like to
express my appreciation for our direct management Mr.Jafar
Maher and our Technical managementMr.Ahmad
Characteristics of Hydrodynamic Journal Bearings," Proc. of
REFERENCES the Intl. Conf. on Hydrodynamic Bearing Rotor System
Dynamics,
ArmentroutR. W. and Paquette. D. J., 1993. Rotor Dynamic Fouad Y., Zeidan and Bernard S., Herbage.; 1994. Fluid Film
Characteristics of Flexure Pivot tilting Pad Journal Bearing," Fundamental and Failure Analysis", Proceedings of the
Trib. Trans, 36,3:443-451. twenty-third turbomachinery symposium, Dallas, Texas, USA.
[FuW. B. and ParkinsD. W.; 1992. Mathematical Analysis of Nicols J. C and Kirk R.G. 1982. Four Pad Tilting pad Bearing
the Performance of Tilting Pad Journal Rearing under Static Design and Application for Multi-Stage Axial Compressors"
Load" Institute of Physic. Journal of Physic, D: Appl. Phys., ASME Journal of Lubrication Technology, 104(4):523-
25:A108-A115. 532(October 1982).
ParkinsD. W. 1979. Theoretical and Experimental BrockwellK., DmochowskiW. and DeCamillo S.; 2004. An
Determination of the Dynamic Characteristics of a Investigation of the Steady-State Performance of a Pivoted
Hydrodynamic Journal Bearings," ASME Journal of Shoe Journal Bearing with ISO VG 32 and VG 68 Oils,” STLE
Lubrication Technology, 101, P129. Tribology Transactions, 47:480-488.
ParkinsD. W. 1990. Description and Appraisal of some
Techniques for the Measurement of the Static and Dynamic