Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HSE-EN-ST06 - Biodiversity Assessment
HSE-EN-ST06 - Biodiversity Assessment
HSE-EN-ST06 - Biodiversity Assessment
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................4
2. PURPOSE ...............................................................................................................................................5
3. SCOPE ....................................................................................................................................................5
4. LAWS AND REGULATIONS ..................................................................................................................6
5. DEFINITIONS & ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................7
6. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES .......................................................................................................13
6.1. GROUP COMPANY ..............................................................................................................................13
6.2. THIRD PARTY INDEPENDENT CONSULTANTS ...............................................................................13
7. REQUIREMENTS..................................................................................................................................14
7.1. BIODIVERSITY AND ITS IMPORTANCE ............................................................................................14
7.1.1. What is Biodiversity? ......................................................................................................................14
7.1.2. Biodiversity of the UAE and the Abu Dhabi Emirate ...................................................................14
7.1.3. Importance of BiodiversIty .............................................................................................................14
7.1.4. Assessement Approach .................................................................................................................15
7.2. OVERVIEW OF THIS STANDARD.......................................................................................................16
7.3. SETTING THE BASELINE ...................................................................................................................16
7.3.1. BIODIVERSITY / ECOLOGICAL BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS ...............................................16
7.3.2. Baseline Survey Scale and Design Development ........................................................................17
7.3.3. HABITAT CLASSIFICATION ...........................................................................................................17
7.3.4. FIELD DATA COLLECTION ............................................................................................................20
7.4. ECOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENTS .........................................................................28
7.4.1. Determining Importance .................................................................................................................29
7.4.2. ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS ..........................................................................................................31
7.4.3. Mitigation Hierarchy ........................................................................................................................32
7.4.4. Monitoring Requirements ...............................................................................................................32
7.4.5. Biodiversity Action Plans ...............................................................................................................33
7.5. REPORTING FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................34
7.5.1. REPORT CONTENTS.......................................................................................................................34
7.6. COMPETENCY OF ECOLOGY PRACTITIONER ................................................................................35
8. COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE ..............................................................................................................35
8.1. PERFORMANCE KPIS .........................................................................................................................35
9. REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................36
10. APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................................37
– EAD HABITAT CLASSIFICATION CODE .................................................................................... 38
– IMPORTANT SITES AND PROTECTED HABITATS .................................................................. 39
– PRIORITY SPECIES LIST .............................................................................................................. 46
–SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS FOR ECOLOGICAL BASELINE SURVEYS ...................... 64
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 3 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
1. INTRODUCTION
In the last 45 years, ADNOC has been managing, producing and preserving the emirate’s hydrocarbon
reserves, on behalf of the Abu Dhabi Government. With its mandate, ADNOC operates within large
tracts of both terrestrial and marine environments including within protected areas and recently notified
protected areas (e.g. Qusahwira field). In addition, ADNOC continue to actively explore and develop oil
and gas resources trapped in the Emirate’s rock formations. However, such industries are not without
risks as associated activities are known to have various levels of interactions and thereby potential
impacts to the environment. Such that ADNOC’s operations, particularly within their concession areas
located within some of the extremely sensitive environments where several threatened species are
known to occur, have the potential for harm to the environment.
One of the components of the environment that is often the focus of impact assessment schemes is
the biological diversity or biodiversity, aptly the term used to describe the totality of the variety of life on
Earth, encompassing all organisms, species, and populations (species diversity); the genetic variation
among these (genetic diversity); and their complex assemblages of communities and ecosystems
(ecosystem diversity).
ADNOC recognise that management and mitigations of risks to consequential impacts to biodiversity
can only be achieved through effective regulation, independent examination, good operating practice,
including independent environmental monitoring and verification. As with the rest of the environmental
parameters and aspects, an appropriate-level independent biodiversity survey and monitoring
throughout the entire life cycle of projects, be it before, during or after site operations, are considered
necessary as part of an effective environmental management system that incorporates robust mitigation
and contingency planning processes most especially prompt detection and effective intervention.
It is in this light, that ADNOC upon review of these risks in seeking excellence with respect to
management of biodiversity as a way of demonstrating its commitment to protection of the environment,
has developed this guideline in line with the overall requirement affording for setting the baseline
biodiversity to afford improvement in assessing and minimising impacts on biodiversity as per ADNOC
Standard on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (HSE-EN-ST01).
This Standard provides guidance on suitable methods and approaches that are required to be
implemented for ecological assessments, including baseline surveys that ensures appropriate data will
be available for adequately assessing current conditions of ecological features (term used throughout
this guideline to mean habitats, species and ecosystems). It is important to note that with regards to
ecological baseline survey and assessments, this guideline draws largely from published and
internationally accepted methods for ecological baseline survey activities but considering specific and
prevailing conditions of ecosystems (e.g. desert, Arabian Gulf) found across ADNOC concession areas.
It has been developed within the context of the current legislative framework and international best
practice approaches to biodiversity or ecological assessment and survey methods. Particularly for the
survey component, the framework provided in this document considers risk-based approach and is
dependent on objective, site specific monitoring, sampling, testing and scientific analysis throughout
the life cycle of the projects.
The objectives of the Standard is to provide a consistent approach to ecological assessment and
surveys or monitoring for regulatory purposes. Particularly, the survey and monitoring requirement have
been highlighted ensuring consistency in the derivation of baseline information for use in assessments
of risks to specific biodiversity components of the site throughout the life cycle of projects.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 4 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
2. PURPOSE
This guidance has been developed to assist ecological professionals working with ADNOC projects to
identify, mitigate and manage impacts to biodiversity and ecosystems. It is generally considered
applicable to all ADNOC development projects but is particularly useful for projects or developments in
concession areas located within important, critical or sensitive habitats and locations (e.g. protected
areas, etc.) where potentially more stringent requirements for impact identification and mitigation or
monitoring is required.
In addition, and in line with the requirements of EIA schemes, the required baseline surveys refer to
the monitoring of environmental parameters before site operations begin. Such activities are
undertaken to establish the pre-existing environmental conditions at a site of interest and the
surrounding areas, providing important understanding of site so that any subsequent changes to these
conditions can be identified.
Ecological baseline surveys, just like any other environmental baseline surveys, involves several stages
of investigation, either desktop-based research or field survey works. Particularly for the field surveys,
such tasks need to be undertaken in line with best practices, and that which are proportionate to the
project type, scale and nature and the potential positive or negative impacts of the projects.
An adequate environmental baseline information gathered during the baseline surveys are then used
to inform the full assessments of the risks that the project brings to the ecological features of the site.
Results of these assessments can then feed into appropriate environmental management systems. The
importance of collecting and appropriate reporting of robust environmental baseline information cannot
be undermined as this facilitates sufficient level to allow for effective and efficient assessments that
support permitting and planning decision making.
The guidelines provided in this document align fully with the ADNOC’s Standard on EIA (HSE-EN-ST01)
which identifies the need for an ecological baseline to be established before site operations commence
and for full identification of ecological risks, mitigation and monitoring requirements at an early stage of
projects.
It also outlines the roles and responsibilities of the various parties within ADNOC Group who have
responsibilities for biodiversity/ecology matters, the common framework and control procedures
through which preparation and approval are managed within the ADNOC Group. It also highlights the
various interfaces between ADNOC, Group Companies (GCs) & external governmental agencies such
as Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi (EAD), Fujairah Oil Industry Zone (FOIZ) Codes of Practice, Dubai
Environmental Agency etc.
3. SCOPE
This standard provides guidance to the ADNOC Group and its Contractors on Bio-diversity assessment
conducted as part of environmental studies. The process is applicable across all ADNOC projects and
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 5 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
facilities / sites that may have interactions with the biodiversity or ecology of the sites of future
operations for both standalone biodiversity or ecological studies as well as those intended to support
the Health, Safety and Environmental Impact Assessment (HSEIA) process in the assessment of
potential biodiversity/ecological impacts prior to construction and requirements for monitoring of habitat
and species status during and after operation as well as for the continuous verification of regulatory
compliance.
In subjective aspects, the standard serves as a guideline to the ecological practitioner for the
satisfaction of minimum requirements proposed by the ADNOC Group.
ADNOC Group and its Contractors shall ensure that all requirements listed herein are fully understood,
implemented, complied with and monitored at all times.
The regulatory framework and principles that apply to biodiversity are detailed in this section.
At the level of the national UAE and local Abu Dhabi Emirate Legislations, the laws that are applicable
to this Standard includes but not limited to:
At the level of the national UAE and local Abu Dhabi Emirate Legislations, the laws that are applicable
to this Standard includes but not limited to:
Federal Law No. 23 of 1999 for the Exploitation, Protection and Development of the Living
Aquatic Resources;
Federal Law No. 24 of 1999 for the Protection and Development of the Environment, and its
amendments, e.g. Federal Law No. (11) of 2006 amending provisions of Articles 12 and (83);
Ministerial Decree No. (37) of 2001: Regulation concerning Environmental Impact Assessment
of Projects;
Federal Law No. (11) of 2002 concerning Regulation and Control of International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna
Local Law No. (5) of 1970 concerning Regulating Hunting of Birds and Animals as Amended by
Local Law No. (1) of 1978;
Local Law No. (13) of 2005 concerning Regulating of Grazing in (the) Abu Dhabi Emirate;
Local Law No. (22) of 2005 concerning Animal Hunting in (the) Abu Dhabi Emirate;
ADNOC GCs must ensure, that their activities comply with all relevant Federal and Abu Dhabi laws and
regulations at all times, including any that may be introduced after the publication of this Standard.
The UAE is a signatory to a number of international and regional conventions, agreements and
understandings which include requirements relating to biodiversity, including protection of species and
habitats, that which have implications for ADNOC operations, as follows:
Convention on Biological Diversity;
Convention on Conservation of Wildlife and its Natural Habitats in the Gulf Cooperation Council
(GCC) countries;
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora;
Bonn Convention on Migratory Species (CMS);
International Convention relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution
Casualties;
International Convention to Combat Desertification in those Countries Experiencing Serious
Drought and or Desertification;
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 6 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
ADNOC Group ADNOC Group includes the Directorates & Functions (in ADNOC
Headquarter), Group Companies and Affiliates.
AEWA Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory
Waterbirds
Audit (HSE) Independent, systematic and documented process of objectively
obtaining and evaluating verifiable evidence to determine that HSE
controls:
Are complete and consistent;
Are (cost) effective and efficient;
Safeguard the company’s resources and promote their effective
use;
Provide, and protect the integrity of, required records and
information; and,
Allow for compliance with policies, chosen standards, laws and
regulations
Audits are an integral component of any assurance process, be it HSE,
financial or any other business context.
BAP Biodiversity Action Plan
Baseline Survey Baseline Survey also called Basic Scoping Survey, is an exposure
assessment strategy employed when the Qualitative OHRA reaches one
or more of the conclusions: there is an exposure risk but its extent is
uncertain; a new process is being commissioned; an unusual activity is
planned; significant changes were made to an existing process; control
measures were introduced since the last assessment was made.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 7 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Biodiversity Derived from the term “biological diversity” meaning variability among
living organisms from all sources including, inter alia, terrestrial, marine
and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which
they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species and
of ecosystems1. Thus, considering biological diversity at three main
levels: genetic diversity, species diversity and ecosystem diversity.
Brownfield project Brownfield project refers to project of expansion, extension, addition or
revamping of units, equipment, utilities or services on an existing facility.
CBD United National Convention on Biological Diversity
cm
centimetre
CMS Convention on Migratory Species
Compensation, or Generally, this refers to a recompense for some loss of feature or service
compensatory and is something which constitutes an equivalent or more to make good
measure the lack of, or modification of something else (typically the naturalness
of an area). It can involve something (such as money) given or received
as payment or reparation (as for a service or loss or injury). Specifically,
compensation for biodiversity involves measures to recompense, make
good or pay damages for loss of biodiversity or any ecological feature
caused by a project2.
Competency The ability to perform a particular job in compliance with industry
accepted performance standards. This encompasses the technical
requirements and skill to perform the job as well as having knowledge
and understanding to enable the job to be carried out successfully under
different and changing conditions, and to handle emergency situations
which may possibly occur.
Contractor A ‛Contractor’ is defined as an individual or organization having a
contract/sub-contract with ADNOC Group for the provision of services,
equipment or performance of works. The term ‟Contractor” as used in
the ADNOC Group Contracts Procedure is synonymous with the terms
including but not limited to ‟Consultant”, ‟Sub-Contractor”, ‟Service
Provider” or ‟Supplier”.
DDV Drop-Down Video
1
Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada
2
Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP). 2012. Glossary. BBOP, Washington, D.C. 2nd updated edition.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 8 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Ecological Feature Represent the composition and spatial attributes of biodiversity, such as
or Patterns species abundance and richness, habitat heterogeneity and distribution.
Patterns are often underpinned by ecological processes (i.e. that which
structure ecosystems and contribute to ecosystem function).
Ecology Term used to describe the biological community structure in an area,
including presence of rare or endangered flora and fauna.
Ecosystem Term used to describe the physical and biological components that make
up an area.
3
Convention on Biological Diversity, op. cit.
4
Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) (2005) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing, Volume 1, Current State and Trends.
Island Press, Washington
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 9 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Genetic Diversity The variation in the amount of genetic information within and among
individuals of a population, a species, an assemblage, or a community5.
GIS Geographical Information System
Group Company Means any company within the ADNOC Group, other than ADNOC.
Group HSE Means ADNOC Group Health Safety & Environment Function.
IBA
Important Bird and Biodiversity Area
IPIECA International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation
Association
ITIS Integrated Taxonomic Information System
km
kilometre
km2
square kilometre
KPI Means key performance indicator, which is a type of a performance
measurement that evaluates the success of a particular activity.
5
UN (1992) Environment and Development (Terminology bulletin: 344). United Nations, New York, USA
6
Convention on Biological Diversity, op. cit.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 10 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
m metres (distance/length)
mm millimetres (distance/length)
m2
square metre
MoEW
Ministry of Environment and Water
MOOPAM Manual of Oceanographic Observations and Pollutant Analyses Methods
7
Dudley N (2008) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 11 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Standard Means ‛standard setting’ documents which, in effect, set out mandatory
requirements that shall be complied with and implemented across
ADNOC Group.
UK United Kingdom
Value (of Refers to the importance or sensitivity of biodiversity and may relate to
biodiversity, its contribution towards the function and integrity of affected
ecological features, ecosystem/s, persistence of biological diversity, maintenance of
etc.) ecosystem service provision, and/or importance to society (e.g. intrinsic
values, cultural significance)10.
VP Vice President
WWF World Wildlife Fund
μm micrometer
8
Lovejoy TE (1980) Changes in Biological Diversity. In: Barney GO (ed) The Global 2000 Report to the President, Vol 2 (The technical report). Penguin,
Harmondsworth, UK, pp 327–32
9
Fauna & Flora International (FFI). 2017. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Good Practice Guidance for Oil and Gas Operations in Marine Environments.
FFI: Cambridge U.K. Available from: www.fauna-flora.org. p. 133.
10
Ibid., p. 131
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 12 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
ADNOC Group Companies: Within the ADNOC Group Companies, the respective Division shall be
responsible/ accountable for the implementation of this Standard across the Group Company (GC) and
ensuring that Contractors implement the requirements thereof when undertaking an ADM study.
The Group Company shall be the ultimate owner of the biodiversity assessment and be
responsible/accountable for its development and implementation. The Group Company Group
Company Corporate Health Safety and Environment Function shall:
Ensure that competent and independent subject matter experts are involved in the development
of the biodiversity assessment as per the competency requirements of this standard and the
competency requirements outlined in the HSEIA Standard (HSE-RM-02). The Group Company
Corporate Health Safety and Environment Team shall review and technically approve the
independent third party consultants including the CVs of the lead technical personnel associated
with ADM Studies;
Review & technically approve the biodiversity assessment during any stage of the project
lifecycle (including the combined phase or modification projects);
Liaise with ADNOC Group HSE Function for Regulatory Approval of biodiversity assessment as
part of EIA Reports by timely submissions and follow up; and
The Group Company Corporate HSE Division shall be the custodian (single point repository) of
all the Group Company EIA Reports & HSEIA Dossiers developed for various projects &
operations.
In case of any projects undertaken by the ADNOC Directorates, the relevant Function Manager shall
be the technical approver and custodian of the biodiversity assessment.
In the event the biodiversity assessment is being prepared by a third party independent consultant, the
consultant team shall meet the following requirements:
The consultant shall be registered and pre-qualified by ADNOC and proposed team shall be
approved by respective GC CHSE as per technical evaluation criteria;
The consultant engaged to conduct biodiversity assessment within the Emirate of Abu Dhabi
shall be ‘Category A’ approved by EAD for the relevant ecological service, and;
The competency requirements of the personnel involved in the biodiversity study shall comply
with this standard and the HSEIA Standard (HSE-RM-ST02).
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 13 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
7. REQUIREMENTS
Biodiversity or biological diversity is defined in Article 2 of the Convention of Biological Diversity (i.e.
Rio Convention, 1992) as the “variability among living organisms from all sources including, inter alia,
terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part;
this includes diversity within species, between species and of ecosystems”. Thus, considering biological
diversity at three main levels: genetic diversity, species diversity and ecosystem diversity. Genetic
diversity is the variation within a single species, including the differences among the individuals in a
local population that can be inherited. Another explanation of the diversity is exemplified by the varying
adaptations developed from interactions, as brought about by the various relationships in nature such
as competition, predation, commensalism, symbiosis, etc., amongst majority of the living forms often in
the context of evolution or co-evolution. Diversity of life can also be explained by the heterogeneity of
habitat in relation to the geographical diversity of the physical environment at the local, regional,
continental and at the global scale. As such variability in nature allows living forms to proliferate.
Simple as it may sound due to the above definitions, scientists and researches alike are often
confounded with the inherent difficulty to define and measure biodiversity in practice. Such that even
the most commonly used descriptor of species diversity, i.e. the species richness or number of species
within a community, is only at best a measure of one aspect of global biodiversity. Making any effort to
estimate global species diversity not easy, particularly when the current inventory of biodiversity is
deemed incomplete that there is an ever-widening gap on the estimates of the total number of species
in the world, which is thought to vary from 5 million to 50 million.
The natural landscape in the UAE is considered limited in terms of biodiversity, mainly influenced by
the particularly hot and dry environments. Despite this, a wide array of habitats comprising three main
ecosystems can found there; including desert ecosystem which takes up approximately 80% of the
country’s total area, mountain ecosystems (2.6% of the country’s area) and approximately 2,390 km of
coastal / marine ecosystem found bordering the Arabian Gulf and the Sea of Oman. Though vegetative
cover is generally limited due mainly to the prevailing severe climatic conditions, they are however
equally important as these habitats support what many consider as one of the most unique biodiversity
assemblages in the region. This includes sand desert habitat generally featuring a mixture of low dunes,
high dunes and intervening sand flats. The coastal areas which are typically characterised by narrow
raised beaches of calcareous sand with saline flats (sabkha) bordered by a low escarpment of tertiary
rocks.
Because of the UAE’s location being in a meeting point between the Indo-Asian and Afro-European
regions, the flora and fauna is relatively rich, with 731 plant species, 51 mammal species, 440 bird
species, 67 amphibian and reptile species and many marine species, including 40 varieties of coral
reefs, 500 fish species, 4 turtle species and 109 varieties of algae. In addition, approximately 2,636
species of invertebrates as well as 15 varieties of spiders are known from the UAE, though it is
estimated to range from 4,000 to 5,000 species overall.
Particularly in Abu Dhabi Emirate, approximately 3,787 terrestrial and marine species have been
recorded. This includes 436 vascular plants, 51 mammals, 427 birds, 57 amphibians and reptiles, 456
fishes, 47 sharks, rays and skates, and 2,313 invertebrates.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 14 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Concern for biodiversity has risen in recent years as the links between biodiversity and ecosystem
functioning becomes increasingly well established. Particularly as the role of biodiversity in maintaining
the delivery of ecosystem services that are essential to human well-being becomes substantially known.
Human societies have for so long benefited from, and have been dependent on, ecosystem services,
be it direct consumption as is the case of food or water, or via experiences (e.g. appreciation of
sceneries), or any other means that contribute to the overall environmental conditions for human life
(e.g. stability of climatic conditions and protection against calamities). Such that ecosystem services
can be broadly classified into four types, namely, supporting, provisioning, regulating, and cultural
services.
The importance of biodiversity becoming more apparent in the light of the dependency to some degree
of such ecosystem functioning. Species are however being lost today at accelerated rates, considered
to be 10–100 times higher than previous extinctions based on fossil records. With such an impending
collapse in global biodiversity, many experts believe that the ability of ecosystems to maintain providing
for human needs becomes suspect. Therefore, there is a growing impetus for the understanding and
saving of biological diversity.
There are three key principals considered with biodiversity as outlined below:
Many companies are now looking at ways in which they can offset residual impacts and even
make positive contributions to biodiversity beyond the break-even point. In other words they are
aiming to achieve ‘net positive outcomes’ for biodiversity.
Key conclusions are the need for stakeholder engagement and public participation procedures
that capture biodiversity interests, as well as HSEIA procedures that reflect ecosystem processes
and limits. This means that surveys should take place not just within affected areas, but should
include all those areas where ecological changes might be induced (whether directly or indirectly).
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 15 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
For example if a small area of forest were affected directly, implications of this should be
considered for the whole forest.
The preferred approach with regards to biodiversity in ADNOC is that of the ecosystem approach.
This is consistent with the guidance issued by EAD.
As with any standard, this document does not intend to replace industry best practice guidance for the
assessment of ecological impacts. It is in this light that the guidelines published by the Chartered
Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (CIEEM) for Ecological Impact Assessment
(EcIA), still widely recognised as the industry standard is referenced where appropriate in this
Standard.
In line with the CIEEM, the impact assessment adapted in this Standard also follows a process that
which provides a useful framework for establishing a baseline and predicting and monitoring
ecological change. The EcIA thus comprise of the following stages:
Scoping to establish the likely zone of influence and scope of data collection
Baseline data collection involving desk study and field survey, possibly consultation (with
environmental authorities or similar institutions) to identify the ecological resources and
features likely to be affected
Evaluation of ecological resources and the services they provide
Assessment of predicted impacts, including potential for cumulative impacts
Identification of avoidance and mitigation measures and proposals for any compensation
measures required to reduce residual impacts
Assessment of the significance of residual impacts, based upon the refined project,
incorporating avoidance, mitigation and/or compensation measures
Identification of monitoring measures required to evaluate success of mitigation or justify
assumptions from initial impact assessment
A summary of the consequences for decision making for example, compliance with legislation
and proposals for monitoring the effectiveness of mitigation measures
It is imperative that a robust baseline is established for the relevant biodiversity components or as a
minimum the key important ecological features of project sites including habitats and associated flora
and fauna before any meaningful assessment or ecological monitoring of the likely effects of a proposed
activity can be made. The reason for this is that adequately collected baselines provide an effective
reference point against which future changes associated with projects or development can be assessed
and for comparison during subsequent monitoring works. As such, baseline studies should be able to
comprehensively characterise the ecological features both within the boundaries of the projects and
the immediate surrounding areas.
The ecological baselining exercise should determine the habitats that will be potentially affected, the
floral and faunal species, population or communities that thrive in the area, the proximity of protected
areas or other important areas for biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning that can potential be
disrupted due to project activities.
This is also in line with the requirements of the EAD as stipulated in their Technical Guidance Document
for EIA (Ref. No. EAD-EQ-PCE-TG-02, EAD, 2014) which environmental baseline data to be collected
that will provide a comprehensive and detailed description of the current condition of the environmental
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 16 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
component. Specifically, the EAD requires that an evaluation and description should be done of all
habitats, ecosystems, and flora and fauna that could or will be impacted by the proposed project, with
special emphasis on habitats, systems, and flora and fauna that are threatened, endangered, uniquely
sensitive, or of regional or international importance. As a minimum, information on local, regional,
national, and international abundance of flora and fauna, the habitat requirements, territory or home-
range size, migration patterns, and other behavioural characteristics that could be impacted by the
proposed project should also be included. The sources of data or methods used to collect the baseline
data should account for seasonal and annual variations in the presence and the abundance of flora and
fauna. Therefore, the sampling regime used to characterize the baseline condition of flora and fauna
may require sampling across multiple seasons and years. The selection of the sampling regime should
be justified in the EIA report and be based on the flora and fauna present in the project area and area
of probable impact.
In this stage, the specific approach for conducting the baseline studies are conceptualised and
generally deals with how biological information is generated. The approach is typically coupled with the
financial mechanism for completing the work and hence the final scale and design is often dictated by
ADNOC or the relevant ADNOC GCs.
ADNOC projects are of varying scales and nature and can be broadly categorised into either a liner
development (e.g. Oil Pipeline), non-linear (e.g. Oil Refinery) or a combination of both (e.g. Full Oilfield
Development) as well as encompasses either onshore, offshore or both environments. Therefore, as a
minimum, the design of the ecological baseline studies should be project-specific. The baseline data
collection should be relevant to the aims of the study, e.g., the likely ecological effects of a proposed
project, and should be able to identify all affected ecological features at the project footprint and
immediate surrounding areas.
Whilst the principles and process for ecological baselining outlined in this guidance are relevant to all
developments that may impact on ecological features, the data or information collected will be
proportionate to the nature and scale of the projects. It is the professional ecologists or practitioners
judgment to use their knowledge and experience to allocate the resources required for the collection of
adequate data in line with the required level of information as inputs for the impact assessment of each
project and to refine their own methodologies when deemed necessary and justified.
In sites where important ecological features are absent, a sufficiently comprehensive baseline may be
achieved through the preliminary desktop review and limited ecological field survey (e.g. site walk-
over/drive-over surveys or rapid ecological surveys). For others, where there is potential for impacts to
important ecological features, full ecological surveys are required, with focus on target groups or
covering a wider spatial (geographical) or temporal scale. Where there are protected species involved,
the specific requirements in respect of the timing (e.g. seasonality, breeding period, migration), duration
and baseline data collection methods will need to be considered. There should also be involvement of
other technical discipline experts as there may also be potential for site-based and wider cumulative
effects on ecological resources due to air and water quality impacts and those resulting from noise,
vibration and dust deposition.
Habitats of the project areas can be mapped using information from the EAD enviroportal or through
project-specific remote sensing or imagery-based classification.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 17 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
The EAD has completed an analysis of the habitats of the entire Abu Dhabi Emirate’s marine
and terrestrial environments and these are available through their enviroportal
(https://enviroportal.ead.ae) which is depicted in the figure below.
Appendix 1 provides a list of the terrestrial and marine habitat classification scheme adapted for
the Abu Dhabi Emirate.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 18 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Such preliminary and initial maps can be developed using digital image classification
techniques that analyses multispectral data collected by earth observation satellites to identify
key habitats. This initial classification can be carried out using a digital image classification
technique known as unsupervised classification. Using this technique, pixels within the satellite
image are grouped into classes with similar spectral properties. This will produce a preliminary
habitat map which can then be used by the field team to identify and focus the efforts in the
field and collect particular ground-truthing data to be used in the further analysis to refine the
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 19 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
habitat maps. Preliminary classification shall make use of imageries of resolution 300m or
better.
Although at this stage, the classification produced through the initial entitation is preliminary
and the actual vegetative cover composition can only be verified upon completion of fieldworks.
However, as discussed above, this is an important step as it allows preliminary characterisation
and mapping of potential biodiversity areas at the landscape level and facilitates the conduct
of the actual field sampling as the number of sampling areas and other logistical details of the
field surveys can be planned.
Note that it is often difficult to assign the actual vegetation types from ground-truthing activities
with that of features delineated from image-based analysis. The reason for this is that some
vegetation types described on ground during field surveys cannot be distinguished in the imagery,
or the features distinguished in the image analysis may not always correspond to the actual
vegetation types described from the field. As such, a compromise will have to be made between
the remotely sensed data and what is verifiable on the ground with collaboration between the
ecologists and the remote sensing specialists for the final map development.
The geospatial modelling will be carried out within Geographical Information System (GIS) or
remote sensing software in order to determine the location where the species are most likely to
be found in relation to environmental and climatic predictors. The analysis will include the habitat
map, specific ground-truthing information on species of interest, as well as datasets such as
precipitation and elevation.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 20 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
ecological conditions of a site, in terms of habitats and associated floral and faunal species, can
be based.
For terrestrial environments, the following minimum components should be adequately surveyed
and described:
Marine habitats, including, but not limited to, the following ecotypes:
1. Corals
2. Seagrasses
3. Macroalgae
Marine fauna
1. Large vertebrates
Mammals
Reptiles
Cartilaginous fishes (Chondrichthyes including Elasmobranchs)
Large fishes
2. Flora including macroalgae
3. Plankton – Phytoplankton and Zooplankton
4. Benthic communities (e.g. Invertebrates, meiofauna, infauna)
Appendix 4 provides a summary of the anticipated methods that can be applied depending on
the type of development and based on the nature of the ecological features that may be present
in the Project site.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 21 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Representativeness
Adequacy of coverage
Knowledge of known or suspected biodiversity value
Accessibility
In addition to the above, it is also considered for sampling locations to be in relative proximity for
practical reasons and to enhance sampling efficiency.
For brownfield areas or highly disturbed sites, sampling methodology may involve characterising
vegetation and the distributions of certain taxa at a given time by recording vegetation covers
and recording species presence during the fieldwork. Given this, the type of data to be collected
may be nominal (i.e. using a predefined category such as presence or absence). However, for
greenfield, undisturbed and more complex (in terms of habitats) sites, sampling shall be
undertaken to account for species abundances and seasonality. Because species abundance or
relative abundances will need to be determined, standard species inventory techniques and
exhaustive sampling will need to be employed. Data collected may be as simple as ordinal (an
extension of nominal data in which the categories are ordered, e.g. the so-called DAFOR scale
where species abundance are classified into an ordered scale such as “dominant”, “abundant”,
“frequent”, “occasional”, “rare”) or quantitative (e.g. frequency, percent cover, etc.).
A sampling plan should be developed detailing the rationale for selecting polygons for sampling
and the actual techniques to be employed to sample plants and animals. Framework for plant
and animal sampling techniques are further discussed in the following sections.
There are two general types of sampling methods employed in ecological sampling for plants
and animals; quadrat and transect lines. A quadrat is a sampling unit in the form of a frame,
usually a square [1], of known area and that which is used to isolate a subset of the population.
In this method, the quadrat is placed randomly or systematically within a pre-selected sampling
location or plot and all the individuals within the quadrat are counted and/or measured. Quadrat
size affects the measured values of frequency, density, and cover, etc. and depend upon the
type of vegetation being sampled and should be decided upon a the onset by the professional
ecologists undertaking the survey. Typical quadrat sizes most often used are as follows:
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 22 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
However, other optimal quadrat sizes have been suggested for frequency estimates as follows:
Suitable and acceptable approaches as provided in published literature can be adopted and used,
and the professional ecologist is responsible for describing the approach, to allow for replicability
and representativeness, and justified where necessary. The ecological baseline survey may use
a combination of quadrat (mainly for plants) and transect (for fauna) surveys as further described
in the following sections. The literature below provides a comprehensive reference of biodiversity
sampling methods:
Hill, D. et al. (2005) Handbook of Biodiversity Methods: Survey, Evaluation and Monitoring.
Cambridge University Press [2]
For terrestrial ecological survey, methodologies used can be adopted from Hill, D. et al. (2005)
or other literature for specific approaches for sampling specific taxa or groups, for example:
Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., Hill, D. A. and Mustoe, S. H. (2000) Bird Census Techniques.
Second edition. London: Academic Press [3]
Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. (1974) Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology.
Wiley, New York. [4]
United Kingdom Onshore Oil and Gas (UKOOG) (2015) Guidelines for the Establishment
of Environmental Baselines for United Kingdom (UK) Onshore Oil and Gas, UKOOG, UK
[5]
For marine ecological surveys, methodologies used shall be adopted from the following
standards or manuals:
English S, Wilkinson CR and Baker VJ. (1994) Survey Manual for Tropical Marine
Resources. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville [6]
Regional Organization for the Protection of the Marine Environment (ROPME) (1999)
Manual of oceanographic observations and pollutant analyses methods (MOOPAM),
ROPME, Kuwait [7]
The Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and
Gulf of Aden (PERSGA) / Global Environment Facility (GEF) (2004) Standard Survey
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 23 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Methods for Key Habitats and Key Species in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden - PERSGA
Technical Series No. 10, PERSGA, Jeddah [8]
Flora and Fauna International (FFI) (2017) Good Practice Guidance for Oil and Gas
Operations in Marine Environments. FFI: Cambridge U.K. [9]
(f) Marine Ecology
Given the dynamics and complexity of marine ecosystems, the scale and design of marine
ecological baseline survey is highly varied and depend greatly on project specific requirements.
The marine ecological professional tasked to undertake the survey will therefore be responsible
for designing the survey programme that which will commensurate with the level of information
required.
The following framework methods adapted mainly from Survey Manual for Tropical Marine
Resources [6] for characterising the marine ecological baseline of target sites are provided for
ease of reference to the most widely used methods for characterising marine ecological features.
Such method may be employed in characterising habitats and species in a variety of habitats
including but not limited to corals, seagrass and intertidal habitats.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 24 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
The infauna samples were then assessed for viability (with >35% grab volume considered
acceptable) before sieving through a 500μm (0.5mm) stainless steel sieve. The remaining
fraction was transferred to a clearly labelled sample pot for subsequent fixation with 5% buffered
formalin with Rose Bengal Stain (RBS) solution prior to infauna identification.
This method can be used to assess a variety of sessile benthic habitat and communities including
corals, seagrasses, soft bottoms, and rocky shores as well as other marine flora and fauna such
as fishes and invertebrates.
Multivariate techniques of classification and ordination are also often required for benthic
communities as these allow considerations of species identify, unlike diversity indices which are
limited to a numerical expression of species abundance distributions.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 25 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Total Counts
This method involves counting the entire population of a given site to come up with at an
accurate assessment of the population size. Such approach is applicable to conspicuous
species in a small area, or an aggregating species such migratory birds.
Time Searches
This method involves counting the entire population of a given site to come up with at an
accurate assessment of the population size. Such approach is applicable to conspicuous
species in a small area, or an aggregating species such migratory birds.
Quadrats
As described above, a quadrat is a sampling unit in the form of a frame, usually a square
[1], of known area and that which is used to isolate a subset of the population. In this
method, the quadrat is placed randomly or systematically within a pre-selected sampling
location or plot and all the individuals within the quadrat are counted and/or measured.
Quadrats are used to define sample areas within which measurements of some sort are
taken. In this method, the species will simply be counted within the quadrat, either for
frequency data or for density (and hence population size) estimation.
Line and Strip Transects
A transect is a sampling unit in the form of a straight line [1], and the observation points
along the line can be randomly or uniformly placed, depending on the required data to be
collected. Transect methods involve moving along a line between two points and counting
the number of objects observed on either side of the line.
Line Intercept and Point Intercept Transects
These are the most basic types of transect, in which the transect is a simple one-
dimensional line. Only individuals that touch the line are recorded. Line intercept transects
record touches continuously along the line. Point intercepts record touches at regular
intervals along the line. This method cannot be used for surveying mobile species but is a
useful tool for surveying vegetation as it can be used to estimate relative abundance, cover
and frequency.
Point Counts
Point counts involve counting and/or measuring distances to objects in all directions from
a point. The method involves carrying out a standardised, timed count from a point.
Typically applied to surveying mobile species at a certain critical distance (as beyond this
detectability declines significantly and the species encountered should be ignored and not
recorded).
Flora
The vegetation of the site will be recorded as vegetation communities, recording all
species encountered and accounting the vegetation cover. Vegetation communities refers
to the natural assemblages of co-existing and interacting plant species that depend on and
modify their environments whilst vegetation cover is a broader grouping of similar
vegetation making up the habitats, e.g. grasslands, etc. The term vegetation types refer to
in this document representing either communities or cover.
Given the discussion above of the general site selection and sampling approach, there are
two general ways into which floral composition can be sampled in the field. Either through
sampling at point locations to verify the vegetation types and identify dominant floristic
groups, or through sampling in plots at a subset of pre-selected sampling locations/plots
to obtain quantitative information on plant diversity. For the point sampling, the coordinates
of the specific points will be captured with a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. At
this point, plant species will be identified out to 10m to 20m distance around the point in a
360-degree “sweep”. At the plots, plant diversity will be recorded in a quadrat of 10m x
10m quadrat (this can be modified to a 20m x 20m in tree groves).
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 26 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Where the polygon is large, a combination of driven or walked survey can be undertaken,
stopping at distinct ecological feature and positioning a quadrat of approximately 20m x
20m area. In largely uniform habitats, at least one quadrat will be sampled to characterise
the habitat and flora. Otherwise, more variably covered habitats will be sampled using
multiple quadrats in which the number of quadrats will generally correspond to the number
of distinct vegetation types found in the area.
Further information on other applicable methods used that can be adapted on sampling
vegetation types are provided in Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology [4] as well as
other literature describing specific methods for vegetation survey and quantitative
assessment, examples are provided below:
1. Look-see method [2] – conducted by walking through the site, visiting the
appropriate habitat(s), and estimating each population size by eye or by counts if
possible. Population estimates can either be exact figures, or any means to give an
order of magnitude, or a crude indication of the population size can be given by
using the DAFOR scale (see Section 7.3.4 above). Though it is widely used and
probably applies to many situations and conditions, it is considered subjective and
provides relatively crude data
2. Line intercept method as described above - to estimate percentage cover.
Mammals
Due to the secretive nature of, and the effective use of cover by, many mammal species,
direct counts are often impossible. Larger mammals can however be effectively counted
by direct counts. Estimates of population size for the majority of small and medium sized
mammals depend on indirect methods, such as indices of evidence left by mammals or
live trapping.
As such, as a minimum, mammalian surveys should be undertaken using a combination
of timed searches, transects and point count surveys, supplemented by indirect methods
such as camera recording and live trappings. Mammals will be recorded when visually
sighted and observations of evidence of presence including tracks, burrows, scats, and
other signs, if identifiable. Nocturnal torchlight surveys may also be undertaken to
determine the presence of any mammalian species such as rodents, bats and foxes,
where practicable and permitted. The specific methodologies employed for the
mammalian surveys are further discussed below.
1. Small Non-Volant Mammals Survey
In areas where activities of small non-volant mammals have been noted, live traps,
e.g. Sherman Traps, baited with rolled oats coated with peanut butter will be
deployed in transect formation prior to sunset, with all traps collected within 1 hour
of sunrise the following day to limit stress on the captured animal and prolonged
exposure to elevated temperatures.
To supplement live trappings, remote infra-red camera traps baited with chicken
carcass or liver will be deployed for at least three (3) consecutive nights at various
locations to facilitate documenting secretive species, mainly medium sized
mammals.
2. Volant Mammals Survey
For the survey of volant mammals (i.e. bats), a combination of the following methods
can be undertaken, where practicable and permitted:
Visual inspection of any trees or other human structures that may potentially
serve as roosting sites; and
Mist netting.
The visual inspections can be done with the aid of high-quality binoculars. Areas
with standing water with a higher potential for fly-bys will also be visited, where
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 27 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
available, during dusk to increase the likelihood of observing bats. In addition, fully
qualified ecologists will set up mist nets in areas suitable for bat activity (e.g. wooded
corridors suspected to be fly-bys). The deployed mist nets will be observed for a
couple of hours from dusk to ensure that any bats captured are immediately
retrieved for identification and morphometric examination prior to release.
To supplement the above, passive acoustic (echolocation) monitoring can also be
conducted. Acoustic monitoring using automatic bat detection units (e.g. Anabat
Express) to detect bats’ ultra-sonic echolocation calls is a widely accepted and
useful technique for determining the presence of some bat species (exception of
the non-echolocating bats). Bat call recording units will need to be installed for 3
nights, locating them in areas that are favourable for bat roosting or foraging and
suspected pathways during emergence or return to roosting.
Birds
Birds are considered the most charismatic of all animal groups and hence the most
intensively studied such that substantial information on their distribution, ecology and
population statuses may already be available. They are highly mobile and relatively
conspicuous and hence can be easily identified.
Methods used for surveying and monitoring birds in the field may include one or a
combination of the following:
1. Total counts
2. Line transects
3. Point counts
4. Mist netting
Reptiles and Amphibians
For the assessment of reptiles (and amphibians, where applicable), can be undertaken
both day and night visual encounter survey. This will involve walking roads, existing trails
or purposely cut trails throughout a representative selection of all habitat types in search
of as many reptiles species as possible during the designated survey period (normally up
to 3 consecutive nights per sampling area).
Detection of reptiles along the transects (used for plant surveys) will be assisted with the
use of binoculars (scanning ahead for basking animals during the day) and for nocturnal
surveys, geckoes can be detected by listening for their calls (aural surveys) or with the use
of torches (to aid detection for reptile eye-shine). In addition, an effort should be made to
search under discarded plywood sheets and other anthropogenic debris as well as under
more natural shelters such as rocks and dead wood. Where it is permitted, pit fall traps
may also be set up to supplement recording of difficult to detect herpeto-faunal species
Invertebrates
Collection and sampling of invertebrate fauna using standard techniques (e.g. tree shaking
and pitfall traps) may be undertaken in conjunction with the above methods, e.g. transects,
quadrats, where practicable. Opportunistic or incidental records of invertebrates will also
be noted.
7.4. ECOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENTS
The process involved in the assessment of ecological resources will follow the provisions within the
ADNOC Standard on EIA (HSE-EN-ST01). Compared with the other environmental aspects considered
in an EIA process, the assessment of ecological impacts should essentially report and assess
significant residual effects that remains after mitigations, though the potential significant effects without
mitigation should also be noted.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 28 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
The EcIA should include potential impacts on each ecological feature determined as important (see
below for how importance of ecological features can be derived) from all phases of the project.
Finally, as detailed in the ADNOC Standard on EIA, the significant effects shall be assessed in the
context of the predicted baseline conditions within the zone(s) of influence during the entire life cycle of
the project.
The impact assessment process should be able to demonstrate how a proposed development will be
able to comply with statutory requirements and policy objectives for biodiversity. National, regional and
international institutions and organisations have identified sites, habitats and species that can provide
the key focus for biodiversity conservation, and that which is supported by policy and legislation. These
provide an objective starting point for identifying the important ecological features that need to be
considered in impact assessments.
Relevant instruments for determining importance of ecological features are further discussed in the
following sections.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 29 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Al Dhaheri, S., Javed, S., Alzahlawi, N., Binkulaib, R., Cowie, W., Grandcourt, E. and
Kabshawi, M. (2017). Abu Dhabi Emirate Habitat Classification and Protection Guideline.
Environment Agency – Abu Dhabi.
A list of national, regional and international important sites and habitats are provided in Appendix
2 for reference.
(b) Important Species
Apart from international threatened species listing (e.g. International Union for Conservation of
Nature (IUCN) Red List), the UAE has a number of publications and legislative instrument that
highlights key species for protection and conservation as follows:
UAE Priority Species
1. Environment, Health and Safety Management System (EHSMS) Manual Volume 2
Section 1 “Abu Dhabi Environment, Health, and Safety Protection Policies”, Part 8:
Emirate Environmental Protection Policy (EEPP) on Biodiversity and Conservation
– Annex I
2. Statistics Centre − Abu Dhabi (SCAD) (2018) - Biodiversity and Protected Area
Statistics – Abu Dhabi Emirate, Statistics Centre – Abu Dhabi
3. Ministerial Order (224) for 2015 – Important Floral Species List
4. Local Biodiversity Action Plan priority species and habitats
UAE Ministry of Environment and Water (MoEW) (2014) National Biodiversity
Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) 2014-2021, Ministry of Environment and
Water, Abu Dhabi
EAD (2016) Strategic Plan: 2016-2020, Environmental Agency – Abu Dhabi)
UAE Protected Species
Federal Law No. (9) for 1983 - regulating the hunting of birds and other
animals.
Federal Law No. (11) for 2006 for amending some articles of Federal Law No.
24, 1999 for the Protection and Development of Environment.
Local law number 22 for 2005 pertaining to regulation of the hunting of wild
animals in the Emirate – prohibiting hunting of mammals, birds and reptiles
without permission from the EAD
IUCN Red List (https://www.iucnredlist.org/)
Based on the IUCN Red List for Threatened Species [66], none of the vascular plants recorded
in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi are listed in any of the threatened species categories. However, the
local Red List indicates that at least seventeen (17) vascular plants found in the Emirate are
threatened. Among the terrestrial vertebrates, at least 42 species (31 birds, 7 mammals, 4
reptiles) are included in the IUCN Red List.
Of the threatened bird species the Lappet-faced Vulture (Torgos tracheliotos) and Egyptian
Vulture (Neophron percnopterus) are known to breed in the mountains of the Emirate of Abu
Dhabi whilst the remaining species such as Greater Spotted Eagle (Aquila clanga), Saker Falcon
(Falco cherrug) and Cinereous Bunting (Embiriza cineracea) are migratory. Most of the
threatened mammals such as the Arabian Tahr (Arabitragus jayakari) and Arabian Gazelle
(Gazella arabica) are known to inhabit the desert regions of the Emirate. Among the threatened
reptiles, only the Egyptian Spiny–tailed Lizard (Uromastyx aegyptia) dwells in a terrestrial whilst
the remaining threatened are marine turtles.
A full list of species of priority and important species is provided in Appendix 3.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 30 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
In line with the industry standards, the process of assessing the impacts involves the following:
Whilst it is widely considered that EcIAs essentially only assesses and reports significant residual
effects that remain after mitigation measures have been considered, it is good practice to clarify both
the potential significant effects without mitigation and the residual significant effects following mitigation
in the impact assessment process.
Also important to note, that the significant effects must be assessed in the context of the predicted
baseline conditions within the zone(s) of influence during the lifetime of the development. In addition,
impacts from other environmental parameters known to impact upon ecological resources such as
noise, light, dust, etc. should also be considered.
In characterising the ecological impacts, only the characteristics relevant to understanding the
ecological effect of the impacts and determining its significance should be described.
Where the effects of the residual impacts remain significant, compensatory measures should be
proposed considering ecological objectives and other implications that will determine the
outcome of the action.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 31 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
features’ or for biodiversity in general. Conservation objectives may be specific (e.g. for a
designated site) or broad (e.g. national/local nature conservation policy) or more wide-ranging
(enhancement of biodiversity). Effects can be considered significant at a wide range of scales
from international to local.
The mitigation hierarchy represents a framework involving a series of steps designed to help users
anticipate and implement actions to limit the negative direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of projects
to biodiversity and ecosystem services:
Avoidance – the first and important step in the sequence which requires potential impacts
are identified and options that avoid harm to ecological features (for example, by locating
on an alternative site) are implemented.
Minimisation – where all efforts to avoid are exhausted, the next step in the sequence is
to minimise the negative effects through actions that reduce the duration, intensity,
significance and/or extent of impacts that cannot be completely avoided.
Restoration – Where there are significant residual negative ecological effects despite the
mitigation proposed, the feasibility of restoration (carried out on-site that which can repair
the impacts caused by the project either directly or indirectly), should be investigated.
Offsetting – the last step in the mitigation hierarchy that can be considered where
practicable to offset the significant adverse residual impacts that remain after avoidance,
mitigation or restoration by appropriate compensatory measures.
Restoration and offsetting are considered remedial measures that are often complex, expensive and
without certainty in the outcome such that avoidance and minimisation must be prioritised as much as
practicable [9].
Associated to the mitigation hierarchy identified above is the requirement for monitoring of the success
of the mitigation in keeping with legal requirements. An important aspect of establishing monitoring
programmes is the setting of indicators for impacts. The process of selecting indicators for impacts
through monitoring is important to gauge the performance of the project activities against biodiversity
targets. Monitoring biodiversity involves various activities and may involve specific and specialised
monitoring programme (e.g. monitoring benthic habitats, assessing the effects of project operations
and facilities on migratory species, determining changes in ecological community structure in relation
to operations).
The document ‘Biodiversity Indicators for Monitoring Impacts and Conservation Actions’ published by
Energy and Biodiversity Initiative in 2003 [10] remains relevant and very well covers the process of
establishing biodiversity monitoring for oil and gas operations and should be referenced in developing
monitoring programmes for individual projects.
The ecological baselining process is a critical step in the determination of biodiversity indicators for
monitoring impacts and conservation actions. The reason for this is that these iterative and transparent
processes should have set the baseline that which can be used as basis for narrowing the focus of the
evaluation from potential impacts to significant impacts in the context of the operation and the
surrounding environment. This can then be used for listing the indicators for each significant impacts
identified. Once the indicators have been chosen, it is then necessary to put them into operation. Note
that the foundation for subsequent monitoring is the baseline survey.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 32 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
In general terms, monitoring is used to check that objectives and targets set at the onset have been
achieved, to identify new issues and potential impacts and as a feedback mechanism to modify and
improve practices.
The conservation of biodiversity is without doubt very important, for both the long-term and sustainable
provision of benefits that it provides humanity. Such that concern has steadily grown prompting
international, regional and national legislation including development of plans to conserve and enhance
biodiversity, in line with the target of the United National Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) to
arrest the rate of biodiversity loss.
The ADNOC GC may also require biodiversity action plans depending on the results of the HSEIA
process and the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) development. However, in requiring a
Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP), the ADNOC GC should bear in mind that there are strategy and action
plans that already exists at the national (UAE) and local (Emirate) levels with the main goal of a
“sustainable environment and the optimal use of resources to preserve natural heritage” as follows:
UAE NBSAP (2014-2021) – UAE strategic frameworks for action, stemming from the CBD,
and encompass both utilitarian and ethical perspectives on biodiversity conservation which
guide on-the-ground activity at smaller geographic scales.
EAD Strategic Plan (2016-2020) for Abu Dhabi – for the protection and conservation of
biological diversity.
In requiring a BAP, the ADNOC GC should consider the aims, objectives and priorities of such national,
regional and local plans.
Note however that a BAP process covers both assessment (traditionally the domain of an EIA, or in the
case of ADNOC – HSEIA process) and the corresponding plan (i.e. an EMP), such that the BAP can
be a technical equivalent of an HSEIA and EMP documentation. A BAP is therefore not intended to
replace these standard approaches, and in cases where biodiversity is fully addressed in the HSEIA
and EMP processes, the BAP may only serve to partially or fully integrated into an HSEIA – EMP
process.
Preparation and implementation of a BAP as per IPIECA (2005) comprises the following elements:
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 33 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
This section provides guidance regarding the general requirements to be included in the final
biodiversity assessment report for submission to the relevant authority/ies (e.g. ADNOC, EAD, etc.). It
serves as a framework describing the minimum requirements to be included to enable sufficient review
and facilitate competent decision-making regarding biodiversity impacts.
As biodiversity assessment reports should be tailored to the requirement of each project, additional
information that is deemed relevant by the professional ecologists who completed the surveys and that
which adds value may be included but should be justified.
The final biodiversity assessment report, either as stand-alone or as part of the EIAs within the overall
HSEIA report should clearly set out all the ecological information necessary to inform decision making
process. The following are the key aspects that need to be described adequately [12]:
Ecological baseline and trends if the project were not to go ahead, including the survey
data used to inform the baseline
Criteria used to evaluate ecological features
Criteria used to assess the significance of effects arising from the impacts of the project
Justification of methods used
The identification of likely impacts (positive and negative) on ecological features together
with an explanation of the significance of the overall effects for each important ecological
feature
Mitigation, compensation and enhancement measures
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 34 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
As a minimum requirement, the company to be contracted for ecological services for ADNOC project/s
should be registered with the EAD as a Class A registered environmental consultant, approved for
undertaking ecology studies.
The ecology practitioner should have demonstrated educational qualification and experience relevant
to delivering ecological studies. The Lead Ecologist/s should have at least a Master of Science degree
in Biological Sciences or other specialisms, e.g. Zoology or Botany, Wildlife, Environmental Biology, or
highly related sciences. The other Ecologist/s should be at least a holder of a Bachelor of Science
degree in Biological Sciences or other specialisms, e.g. Zoology or Botany, Wildlife, Environmental
Biology, or highly related sciences. In addition, the Lead and other Ecologist/s should have at least ten
(10) years of relevant professional experience in biological or ecological studies, with at least five (5)
years experience in working in the UAE.
8. COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
ADNOC and GCs shall conduct an audit of the implementation of this Standard at the intervals defined
in the Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) Audit Standard. The close out of the actions arising from
the EIA process (which includes ecological studies) shall be reviewed and closed in accordance with
the Project Health, Safety, and Environment Review (PHSER) Standard.
The approvals from the following authorities and compliance to their conditions and monitoring
requirements shall be verified during operation:
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 35 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
9. REFERENCES
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 36 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
10. APPENDICES
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 37 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
EAD Habitat Classification Code
APPENDIX 1
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 38 of
66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Important Sites and Protected Habitats
APPENDIX 2
Important/Designated Sites
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 39 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Important Sites and Protected Habitats
APPENDIX 2
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 40 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Important Sites and Protected Habitats
APPENDIX 2
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 41 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Important Sites and Protected Habitats
APPENDIX 2
Protected Areas
In an effort to protect the fragile and important terrestrial ecosystems, the Emirate of Abu Dhabi through
the EAD have developed the Protected Area Network. The network of protected areas aims to protect
and conserve ecosystems which support significant number of flora and fauna and habitat to threatened
wildlife species. Presently, there are nineteen (19) declared protected terrestrial and marine areas in
the Emirate of Abu Dhabi as detailed in the table below.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 42 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Important Sites and Protected Habitats
APPENDIX 2
Among these, five Protected Areas and Important or Designated Sites are in close proximity to ADNOC
fields or concession areas and hence should be considered where development activities will be located
in these areas.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 43 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Important Sites and Protected Habitats
APPENDIX 2
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 44 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Important Sites and Protected Habitats
APPENDIX 2
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 45 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
List of priority species as per Annex I of the EHSMS Manual Volume 2 Section 1 “Abu Dhabi
Environment, Health and Safety Protection Policies” Part 8: EEPP Biodiversity and Conservation
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 46 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 47 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 48 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 49 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 50 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 51 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 52 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Sylvia althaea Hume's Lesser Whitethroat دخلة هيوم بيضاء الزور الصغرى
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 53 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 54 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 55 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 56 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 57 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 58 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 59 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Merops persicus Blue cheeked Bee eater الوروار العراقي أزرق الخد
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 60 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 61 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 62 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Priority Species List
APPENDIX 3
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 63 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Summary of Requirements for Ecological Baseline Surveys
APPENDIX 4
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 64 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Summary of Requirements for Ecological Baseline Surveys
APPENDIX 4
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 65 of 66
HSE Management System
HSE Environmental Standards
Biodiversity Assessment
Summary of Requirements for Ecological Baseline Surveys
APPENDIX 4
LEGEND:
R – methods typically applied and should be considered as mandatory for the ecological baselining requirement for the type of
development.
A – methods that are generally applicable, which may be considered by the selected ecological professional to include as supplementary approach to characterise
ecological feature.
P – methods that are sometimes applicable, depending on the available habitat to be characterised as part of the ecological
baselining works.
Standard No.: HSE-EN-ST06 Version No.: 1 Effective date: January 2020 Page 66 of 66