Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Supreme Court Observed That If Two
The Supreme Court Observed That If Two
The Supreme Court Observed That If Two
Litigation is considered as a tedious process. It is not only time-consuming but also costly. The reason
why private parties and institutions have come up with alternative modes of dispute resolution.
Arbitration is one such alternative mechanism that is used to resolve commercial disputes in India.
The Indian Council of Arbitration has provided a set of rules known as the ‘Rules of Arbitration’ that
are to be abided by the parties undergoing the arbitration process as well as the arbitrators. Rule 2 of
these regulations defines Arbitral Tribunal as “an arbitrator or arbitrators appointed for determining a
particular dispute or difference”[1] Section 2(d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 also
defines an arbitral tribunal as a sole arbitrator or panel of arbitrators.
Composition of an Arbitration Tribunal
Chapter III of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (herein referred to as the ‘Act’) lays down
the provisions for the Composition of an Arbitral Tribunal. Also, Rule 22 of the Rules of Arbitration
laid down by the Indian Council of Arbitration states that when an application for arbitration
procedure is received, the Council takes necessary steps for the constitution of an arbitral tribunal to
adjudicate the disputes or differences between parties. Several provisions concerning the composition
of an arbitral tribunal are as follows:
Rule 22 of the Rules of Arbitration provides that if the value of the claim made under arbitration is
One Crore or less, a single arbitrator can resolve the dispute if the parties agree to it. In cases where
the claim to the dispute exceeds one Crore, the arbitral tribunal shall be composed of three arbitrators
with the agreement of the parties.
In Narayan Prasad Lohia vs, Nikunj Kumar Lohia, [2] the Supreme Court observed that if two
arbitrators are appointed for an Arbitral Tribunal instead of three, and they give an award through
common opinion, there will be no frustration of proceedings.
What is the Procedure for appointment of arbitrators?
The procedure and appointment of arbitrators under the arbitral tribunal is specified under Section 11
of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. It states the following:
In Oriental Insurance Company v M/S Narbheram Power and Steel Pvt,[4] it was held that the
arbitration clause under an agreement is to be strictly interpreted. It expresses the intention of the
parties to appoint an arbitrator for the settlement of any dispute. This clause cannot be waived off in
normal circumstances.
What are the grounds for challenging the appointment of arbitrators and its procedure?
When a person is nominated as an arbitrator, he is required to disclose his past or present connection
to either party or parties, whether direct or indirect. Also, he shall disclose if he has a financial,
business, professional or any other interest in any of the parties or in the subject matter of the dispute,
which may prevent him from adjudicating in an impartial manner. Therefore, as perSection12 of the
Act, either party to the dispute may challenge the appointment of an arbitrator on the following
grounds:
1. If there is a sufficient doubt that the arbitrator may act in a partial or biased manner.
2. If the nominated arbitrator does not possess the qualifications required by the parties to the
dispute.
The appointment of an arbitrator can be challenged in accordance with the procedure mentioned in
Section 13 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Either party can challenge the appointment
within 15 days after receiving the knowledge of the constitution of the arbitral tribunal or after the
knowledge of circumstances mentioned above. The authority to decide on the challenge is vested in
the hands of the arbitral tribunal.
In Antrix Corp. Ltd. v Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd,[5] the Court held that if any party to the dispute
disagrees or is dissatisfied with the composition of the arbitral tribunal, it can approach the Court to
challenge the appointment of the arbitrator by way of application.
How can an arbitrator be terminated?
Not only the appointment of the arbitrator can be challenged but also his mandate can be terminated
under Section 14 and 15 of the Act in the following cases:
1. If the arbitrator is unable to carry out his functions in an effective manner or there is an undue
delay in the performance of his duties.
2. If the arbitrator himself withdraws from his office or the parties agree to his termination.
Rule 27 of the Rules of Arbitration also states that an arbitrator can be terminated from his mandate
on account of his resignation or death, if he is negligent in performing his duties or fails to act in an
expeditious manner, and does not declare the arbitral award within a prescribed time.
In National Highways Authority of India vs Gammon Engineers and Contract [6], the Delhi High
Court held that the Arbitral Tribunal is bound by the Arbitration agreement between parties. The
Arbitration agreement cannot be rewritten and neither can the tribunal accept an appointment in part.
Substitution of an arbitrator
If an arbitrator is terminated from his mandate, another arbitrator may be appointed as a substitute by
following the appointment procedure. In such a case, the arbitral hearings can be repeated at the
discretion of the arbitral tribunal. The provisions related to the substitution of an arbitrator are
mentioned under Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Conclusion
The Indian Judiciary has recommended time and again that parties should take up arbitration as a
dispute settlement mechanism to reduce the burden on the courts and for a speedy resolution of
disputes. Therefore, several amendments have been proposed in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996. Sections 10-15 of this Act and Rules 22-27 of the Rules of Arbitration, lays down provisions
for the composition of an Arbitral Tribunal. This is of utmost concern in the adoption of arbitration as
a mechanism for dispute settlement. It is important for the parties to choose the right arbitrator or
arbitrators that constitute the arbitral tribunal so that the award delivered by the tribunal is fair and just
and free of any discrimination or biasness. It also ensures that the dispute is resolved in an effective
and speedy manner.