Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 31

Received History AND

KNOWLEDGE vs
Mythology

By Dilip Rajeev
The education explicitly tells kids that Ramayana
etc are fake fantasies.

The word mythology is associated with it. What


does the word mean? “ The Study of Myths.”

And what does the word myth mean? The definition from
Oxford Languages says, “ a widely held but false
belief or idea.”
Just by sending kids to the modern
education they are shaken off from their
core. They are told everything from God to
Ancient History is false and imaginary.
This is how colonialism works. It never
goes away with the reptilian invaders. It
keeps generating fools who repeat and
enforce their destructive lies.

Instead of saying “mythology” we should


say “ Received History.”

What is wrong in saying that? Go to


Bhutan and ask how that cliff side temple
were built, they will say for matter of fact
without blinking an eye that
Padmasambhava rode on his tiger and
flew up there and built it with his
Superpowers. :

Superpowers, monks transforming their body into light and


disappearing, are all just day to day matter of fact for them
still. Which is why 20 percent of the male population still
becomes monks.
Where is that tradition from? Nalanda, India.

There are different versions of


Ramayana, and History is
complex.

Kids should be introduced to


the complex body of
knowledge that were received
from ancient India.

They should be introduced to


the idea of dimensions, higher
worlds, yugas, frequency
shifts, and the possibility of all
that on a reasoning domain.
They should be taught that
human knowledge of today is
narrow.

They should be taught the


fake history of moon landing
and all the fakery going on.

They should be taught how


the evil reptilian invaders aim
to obscure the truth through
false education – include false
education on India.

They should also be taught


that our understanding of
ancient traditions and their
modes of thinking is now
largely lost and is very limited

and it stays a
field of
discovery.
Instead of pretending we
know everything,

endow them with an


open mind.
An example
of Aryan卍
Education
THE REALITY VS
SPIRITUALITY
DICHOTONOMY IS
FROM THE REPTILIAN EDUCATION

LET’S TAKE ANCIENT ARYAN 卍


MATH
ALL THE AVAILABLE TRANSLATIONS
FROM SANSKRIT OF THE BIJA[DNA-
SEED] GANITA[MATH] Bijaganita - Wikipedia ARE
FALSE TRANSLATIONS– AS YOU WILL
UNDESTAND FROM THE NE XT FEW
PAGES. THE WORK IS BY Bhāskara (c. 1114–1185)
MATH STUDIES WERE KNOWN AS
SANKHYA.
HERE ARE THE FIRST TWO PHRASES
OF THE TEXT:
BG_1a/ utpādakam yad pravadanti buddhes adhiṣṭhitam sat-puruṣeṇa
sāṃkhyās/

BG_1c/ vyaktasya kṛtsnasya tad eka-bījam avyaktam īśam gaṇitam ca


vande//[upajāti]

THIS TRANSLATION BELOW OF


WORD BY WORD WERE NOT DONE BY
ME, but by a Sanskrit teacher. The
sentence translations AFTERWARDS,
are by me – as she admitted,
WITH A BIT OF NUDGING TOWARD
THE TRUTH, THAT she found it
impossible to put it into a sentence,
despite over 20 years of experience in
teaching. The difficulty arises as it is
the science of a different era. Can one
read a mathematical treatise of today
just because one understands
English? People should admit the
difficulty in approaching these texts –
“yet to
and that THEY HAVE

be discovered”
principles, “DEEPER LAYERS OF
MEANING”,idea should be given to the
kid encountering these texts.
The translations done in the British or even
Mughal era of the text are absurdities.

REASON: THEY KANNOT PUT these


words TOGETHER INTO A SENTENCE.
NOBODY KAN. BECAUSE THEY DO
NOT KNOW WHAT IT IS SAYING. "ONE
SEES ONLY WHAT ONE KNOWS" -
GOETHE
TRANSLATION of the above
sentence: THAT WHICH ORIGINS FROM
THE UNIVERSAL INTELLIGENCE
PLANES, ESTABLISHED IN ITS
PROCESSING THROUGH THE 7-FOLD
MAN[7 CHAKRAS, 7-D PROCESSING
CORES] IS
MATHEMATICS[SANKHTYA]
SO CHAKRAS, SPIRITUALITY, HUMAN,
UNIVERSE, THE UNIVERSAL MAN,
MATH, WERE ALL ONE FIELD.
CHAKRAS MEANS THAT WHICH
TURNS/WHIRLS – MATH PROCESSING
CORES.
I present here an alternate translation of the same.
Here – does sankhyah mean “learned calculators” ? Does avyakta mean unknown ALGEBRIC
VARIABLE? What the author forgets is that the plane of universe where the functioning occurs, the
machine layer and the invisible aspects is “Avyakta” – the unmanifest, the unappeared.

BACK TO THE TEXT OF THE BIJAGANITA,


TRANSLATION: OF THE ENTIRE APPEARED
UNIVERSE THAT ONE DNA-FORM, THE
UNAPPEARED GOD[ISHA/ISHWARA], AND THE
NUMBER/MATHEMATICS I OFFER OBEISANCE TO.
NOTE THAT THE EARLIER AUTHOR I POINTED OUT CONFLATES AVYAKTA WITH
AN ALGEBRAIC UKNOWN,

IS BHASKARACHYARA WORSHIPPING THE VARIABLE X? ITS STUPIDITY TO TRANSLATE IT SO.

The Mughal Era translation to Persian and from there to English is entirely
fantasy
Because they cannot tell the Emperor “ eee.e.e.e.e :’( I
kannot read it IN A SENSIBLE WAY, LET ALONE translate
it” without losing their heads and ending up in a
Mughal era grave. Academia makes similar threats – not a physical grave
but a modern academic grave exists for the non-pretenders and the honest ones.

Also: Those two translations have nothing in common – despite they deal with “Bija Ganita of
Bhaskaracharya”

Even more interesting is just two


sentences down the line in the BijaGanita
text,
USUAL TRANSLATION IS : WHAT IS 4-
1? OR WHAT DO YOU GET IF YOU
TAKE AWAY THREE COINS FROM
FOUR?
THE WORD DHANAM MEANS WEALTH - BUT WEALTH FOR THE
ARYANS 卍 WERE AWARENESS OF THE SELF, THE SOUL, THE ABSOLUTE
PLANES

KHSAYAM MEANS WEAKNESS, DECREASE ETC - THE SENSE OF INNER


SOUL AWARENESS LOST IS WEAKNESS

THE MOVEMENT BETWEEN THE INNER MATHEMATICAL DOMAINS OF


PERCEPTION INVOLVE THESE ALTERNATING PERCEPTIONS of soul.
ACTUAL ARYAN

卍 TRANSLATION IS:
UNDERSTAND THE WAY
THE 3 DIMENSIONAL
WORLD EVOLVES FROM
THE FOUR, IN TERMS OF
INNER WORLDS AND
PERCEPTION OF THE
WORLD MACHINE.
The TITLE
OF THE
SECOND SECTION OF
THE BIJAGANTIA TEXT IS
“ THERE ARE 6
DIFFERENT TYPES OF
ZEROES”

THAT IS THE 7
DIMENSIONAL UNVIERSE
HAS 6 DIFFERENT ZERO-
PROCESSING PLANES.
GUIDANCE IS GIVEN ON
THE WAY TO MEDITATE
ON AND UNDERSTAND IT
DIRECTLY, IN THAT
PORTION OF BIJA
GANITA.

IN THOSE SECTIONS, IT
IS NOT A TREATISE ON
ALGEBRA.

THIS VIEWING THE


INDIVISIBLE - NOT
THE MODERN IDEA OF
THE "ATOM" BUT THE
WORLD MACHINE ITSELF
– WHOSE PROCESSING
DOMAINS ARE THE
CHAKRA-PERCEPTIONS.

IN AN ERA, THE SCIENCE


TAUGHT TO THE
PRINCES, AS
DOCUMENTED BY
KAUTILYA IN 500 BC,
WERE LABELED, AND
HERE is an online quote on
it:
Ānvīkṣikī is a term in Sanskrit denoting roughly the "science of inquiry" and it should
have been recognized in India as a distinct branch of learning as early as 650 BCE.[1] However,
over the centuries its meaning and import have undergone considerable variations. In the earliest
period, the term was used to denote Atma-vidya, the science of the soul, in contrast to
Adhyatma-vidya, the spiritual science, or Brahma-vidya, the divine science.
"

How to practice the ancient science of Aanvikshiki or logical ...


https://www.hindustantimes.com › books › book-excer...

14-Apr-2017 — Aanvikshiki is the combination of two words – anu and ikshiki. Anu
means 'atom', the smallest part of
anything. IIkshiki means ‘a person who
wants to know’, an inquirer, a thinker, a
researcher, an examiner or a logician...."

Again a bunch of assumptions. Aunvikshiki


is not in academic contrast to anything. It
is part of the same field that all other
ancient sciences dealt with.
On a skippable side note: The foundation of discovery is being able to say “ I do not know” . Modern India has inherited a lot of brit pretentiousness, where the teachers pretend to
angry, all knowing etc. They have to open lyadmit to the kid what they know is narrow. And knowledge and discovery is an open field. And that nobody generally knows everything. That
humility and setting an example in the aspect of academic honesty, should be part of their training. Why should anybody pretend to eb all knowing and gift the kids also tha tfalse ego-
psychosis in life?
Narrow
definitions
and foolish
assumptions
are used to make everything this vs that.
They write up things just to get a pass in
their academic fields and so on.

To understand what Buddha meant by


Shunyata, one needs to understand the
math in ancient India. The Buddhist

referred to them as Aryan 卍


Shunya is a dimensional processing
plane in the Bija Gantia of
Bhaskaracharya. The second
Chapter title of the text is, “ śūnya-
ṣaṣ-vidham[6 DIFFERENT KINDS
OF ZEROS.]”

and in the Era of Buddha it


would have been definitely
understood that way, for the Aryan
Sciences were more predominant
and part of the training of the
Prince. And the Buddha were a
Prince.

So,
UNDERST
ANDING
THESE
FIELDS IS
NO
TRIVIAL
ENDEAVO
UR, AND
NEEDS
DEEP
STUDY.

EDUCATI
ON
OUGHT
ATLEAST
MAKE
THAT
OBVIOUS
TO THE
KID,

INSTEAD
OF
LABELLIG
N IT ALL
AS MYTH
AND
FOOLISH.
THESE
ARE the
weapons
on India to
be first
removed,
surgically.
The very
words
used are
weapons.
As I pointed out earlier. When

they teach “ Export Quality “ is good


quality, they are teaching, people should
eat nothing of good quality in India.

Take what is good from their fields. They


have stolen in plenty in every field from
linguistics to every other, so boldly take
what is good from their education and
throw out everything else of them..

You might also like