Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

P1: FBQ

ASCE003-39.tex ASCE003/SIE-v1.cls October 22, 2005 0:13

Chapter C13
SEISMIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

C13.0 SEISMIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR in the elements that will actually distort. For example, a glazing
NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS system supported by precast concrete spandrels must be designed
to accommodate the full story drift, even though the height of
In Section 13.5.1 of ASCE 7-05, nonstructural components sup-
the glazing system is only a fraction of the floor-to-floor height.
ported by chains or otherwise suspended from the structure are
This condition arises because the precast spandrels will behave
exempt from lateral bracing requirements, provided they are de-
as rigid bodies relative to the glazing system and therefore all the
signed not to inflict damage to themselves or any other component
drift must be accommodated by anchorage of the glazing unit, the
when subject to seismic motion. However, for the 2005 edition,
joint between the precast spandrel and the glazing unit, or some
it has been determined that clarifications are needed on the type
combination of the two.
of nonstructural components allowed by these exceptions and the
acceptable consequences of interaction between components. In C13.5.9 Glass in Glazed Curtain Walls, Glazed Storefronts,
ASCE 7-02, certain nonstructural components that could repre- and Glazed Partitions. The 2000 National Earthquake Hazards
sent a fire hazard following an earthquake are exempted from Reduction Program (NEHRP) Provisions contain seismic design
meeting the Section 9.6.1 requirements. For example, gas-fired provisions for glazing systems. For ASCE 7, it was found that
space heaters clearly pose a fire hazard following an earthquake, clarity of the provisions could be improved by reformatting the
but are permitted to be exempted from the Section 9.6.1 require- equations.
ments. The fire hazard following the seismic event must be given
the same level of consideration as the structural failure hazard
when considering components to be covered by this exception. In C13.6 MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL
addition, the ASCE 7-02 language is sometimes overly restrictive COMPONENTS
because it did not distinguish between credible seismic interac-
The revisions to Table 13.6-1 are the result of work done in re-
tions and incidental interactions. In ASCE 7-02, if a suspended
cent years to better understand the performance of mechanical
lighting fixture could hit a sheet metal duct and dent a sheet metal
and electrical components and their attachment to the structure.
duct, it would have to be braced, although no credible danger is
The primary concepts of flexible and rigid equipment, ductile and
created by the impact. The new reference in Section 13.2.3 0f
rugged behavior are drawn from the Structural Engineers Asso-
ASCE 7-05 allows the designer to consider whether the failures
ciation of California, Recommended Lateral Force Requirements
of the component and/or the adjacent components are likely to
and Commentary, 1999 Edition, Commentary Section C107.1.7.
occur if contact is made.
Material on HVAC is based on The American Society of Heating,
C13.3.2 Seismic Relative Displacements. The design of some Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. publication A
nonstructural components that span vertically in the structure can Practical Guide to Seismic Restraint, RP-812, 1999. Other ma-
be complicated when supports for the element do not occur at terial on industrial piping, boilers, and pressure vessels is based
horizontal diaphragms. The language in Section 13.3.2 was pre- on the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Codes and
viously amended to clarify that story drift must be accommodated Standards publications.

Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures 371


P1: FBQ
ASCE003-39.tex ASCE003/SIE-v1.cls October 22, 2005 0:13

372

You might also like