Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Astronomy's Place in Science
Astronomy's Place in Science
1
Astronomy’s Place in Science
Course Module
• Astrometry
Astronomers and spaceflight programs also contribute to the study of our own
planet; when missions primed at looking outward (or traveling to the moon and beyond)
look back and snap great pictures of Earth from space.
container. The volume is usually greater than that of the corresponding solid, the best-
known exception being water, H2O. The highest temperature at which a given liquid
can exist is its critical temperature.
• Gas
The spaces between gas molecules are very big. Gas molecules have very weak or no
bonds at all. The molecules in “gas” can move freely and fast.
Gas is a compressible fluid. Not only will a gas conform to the shape of its container,
but it will also expand to fill the container.
In a gas, the molecules have enough kinetic energy so that the effect of
intermolecular forces is small (or zero for an ideal gas), and the typical distance
between neighboring molecules is much greater than the molecular size. A gas has no
definite shape or volume but occupies the entire container in which it is confined. A
liquid may be converted to a gas by heating at constant pressure to the boiling point or
by reducing the pressure at a constant temperature.
Gas is also called a vapor at temperatures below its critical temperature and can be
liquefied by compression alone without cooling. A vapor can exist in equilibrium with a
liquid (or solid), in which case the gas pressure equals the vapor pressure of the liquid
(or solid).
A supercritical fluid (SCF) is a gas whose temperature and pressure are above the
critical temperature and critical pressure, respectively. In this state, the distinction
between liquid and gas disappears. A supercritical fluid has the physical properties of a
gas, but its high density confers solvent properties in some cases, which leads to useful
applications. For example, supercritical carbon dioxide is used to extract caffeine in the
manufacture of decaffeinated coffee.
• Plasma
In a plasma, electrons are ripped away from their nuclei, forming an electron “sea”.
This gives it the ability to conduct electricity.
Like a gas, plasma does not have a definite shape or volume. Unlike gases, plasmas
are electrically conductive, produce magnetic fields and electric currents, and respond
strongly to electromagnetic forces. Positively charged nuclei swim in a “sea” of freely-
moving disassociated electrons, similar to the way such charges exist in conductive
metal. In fact, this electron “sea” allows matter in the plasma state to conduct electricity.
The plasma state is often misunderstood, but it is actually quite common on Earth,
and most people observe it regularly without even realizing it. Lightning, electric
sparks, fluorescent lights, neon lights, plasma televisions, some types of flame, and the
stars are all examples of illuminated matter in the plasma state.
A gas is usually converted to plasma in one of two ways, either from a huge voltage
difference between two points or by exposing it to extremely high temperatures.
Heating matter to high temperatures causes electrons to leave the atoms, resulting
in the presence of free electrons. At very high temperatures, such as those present in
stars, it is assumed that essentially all electrons are “free”, and that a very high-energy
plasma is essentially bare nuclei swimming in a sea of electrons.
Course Module
The Atomic Theory
Democritus greatest contribution to modern science was arguably the atomic theory
he elucidated. According to Democritus’ atomic theory, the universe and all matter obey the
following principles:
• Everything is composed of “atoms”, which are physically, but not
geometrically, indivisible
• Between atoms, there lies empty space
• Atoms are indestructible
• Atoms have always been, and always will be, in motion
• There is an infinite number of atoms, and kinds of atoms, which differ in
shape, and size.
He was not alone in proposing an atomic theory, as both his mentor Leucippus and
Epicurus are believed to have proposed the earliest views on the shapes and connectivity of
atoms. Like Democritus, they believed that the solidity of a material corresponded to the
shape of the atoms involved – i.e., iron atoms are hard, water atoms are smooth and
slippery, fire atoms are light and sharp, and air atoms are light and whirling.
However, Democritus is credited with illustrating and popularizing the concept and
for his descriptions of atoms which survived classical antiquity to influence later
philosophers. Using analogies from our sense experiences, Democritus gave a picture or an
image of an atom that distinguished them from each other by their shape, size, and
arrangement of their parts.
As such, his model included physical links (i.e. hooks and eyes, balls and sockets)
that explained how connections occurred between them. In essence, this model was an
inert solid that excluded other bodies from its volume and interacted with other atoms
mechanically. While this bears little resemblance to modern atomic theory (where atoms
are not inert and interact electromagnetically), it is more closely aligned with that of
modern science than any other theory of antiquity.
While there is no clear explanation as to how scholars of classical antiquity came to
theorize the existence of atoms, the concept proved to be influential, being picked up by
Roman philosopher Lucretius in the 1st century CE and again during the Scientific
Revolution. In addition to being indispensable to modern molecular and atomic theory, it
also explained why the concept of a void was necessary for nature.
Nuclear Reactions
This is an exciting time in nuclear astrophysics, one in which new observational
capabilities have allowed tremendous progress and have shed light on the complex path
that leads to the elements we see in our solar system. For some time, there has been an
understanding that we need explosive neutron-rich environments to produce the heavy
elements (heavier than iron). The abundances resulting from the slow neutron-capture
process (s-process) occurring in massive stars can explain roughly half of the solar
abundances observed around us. The residual abundances originate from the so-called
rapid neutron-capture process (r-process) that takes place in hot, neutron-rich
environments and thus involves neutron-rich nuclei very far from stability. Over the last
decade, the question we were asking was, “What is the site for the r-process?” At the time,
observations provided a roughly consistent picture for the r-process abundances, so there
was thought to be one site for the r-process, and the debate centered on whether it was
core-collapse supernovae or neutron star mergers.
In the last few years, astronomy has filled in much of the picture but, in doing so, has
revealed a situation that is much more convoluted than originally thought. The
accumulating observations of very old, low-metallicity stars have provided reassurance on
the robustness of the main r-process for the heavy elements but have also shown large
disparities in the abundance pattern for the lighter elements; such disparities suggest that
for this region, there may be more than one r-process site. One hypothesis is that another r-
process (different from the main r-process) could be taking place in neutrino-driven wind
nucleosynthesis in supernovae. This process has been referred to as the weak r-process.
For many years, there has been the idea of an intermediate nucleosynthesis process (i-
process) that involves neutron-rich isotopes further away from stability than the s-process
but not as exotic as the r-process isotopes. Over the last few years, we have come to
understand that a slew of different environments can trigger the i-process, including post–
Course Module
asymptotic giant branch stars, carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars, Pb-deficient metal-poor
stars, and rapidly accreting white dwarfs.
The recent kilonova observation following the merging of two nearby neutron stars
(GW170817) has unequivocally determined that neutron star mergers can produce
elements as heavy as the lanthanides in very large amounts. However, as astrophysical
models for these violent collisions advance, there is evidence of several phases/regions in
the merger event, with different astrophysical conditions in which nucleosynthesis could
be taking place. In parallel, the progress of multidimensional models for core-collapse
supernovae is still in the early stages when it comes to nucleosynthesis. However, these
models call for a better understanding of weak-driven processes on nuclei, particularly for
nuclei far from stability.
Guide Questions:
1. What are the four states of matter?
2. What are the different subfields of Astronomy?
3. Who is the scientist that the greatest contribution to modern science is Atomic
Theory?