Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dai Mid-Term
Dai Mid-Term
(days)
73
19 t-Test: Paired one Sample for Means
16
64 Processing Time (days)
28 Mean 43.8888888888889
28 Variance 639.25641025641
31 Observations 27
90 Hypothesized Mean Difference 45
60 df 26
56 t Stat -0.228350426
31 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.410580136968159
56 t Critical one-tail 1.70561791975927
22 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.821160273936318
18 t Critical two-tail 2.05552943864287
45
48 p>0.05
null hypotesis rejected , there is
17 evidence that the mean processing time has changed from 45 days
17
17
91
92
63
50
51
69
16
17
Stir Rate
Ammonium (%) 100 150 Anova: Two-Factor With Replication
2 10.95 7.54
2 14.68 6.66 SUMMARY 100 150
2 17.68 8.03 2
2 15.18 8.84 Count 5 5
2 16.56 8.52 Sum 75.05 39.59
30 12.65 12.46 Average 15.01 7.918
30 15.12 14.96 Variance 6.5382 0.73762
30 17.48 14.96
30 15.96 12.62 30
30 16.23 13.34 Count 5 5
Sum 77.44 68.34
Average 15.488 13.668
Variance 3.2327700000001 1.50092
Total
Count 10 10
Sum 152.49 107.93
Average 15.249 10.793
Variance 4.406121111111 10.17893
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df
Sample 48.48498 1
Columns 99.27968 1
Interaction 34.74248 1
Within 48.03804 16
Total 230.54518 19
problem defination
𝐻_1 : that the means of observation grouped by one fa
𝐻_a : that the means of observation grouped by one fa
𝐻_2 : that the means of observation grouped by other
𝐻_a : that the means of observation grouped by other
𝐻_3 : that there is no interaction between two factor.
𝐻_a : that there is interaction between two factor.
Total
10
114.64
11.464
17.20494
10
145.78
14.578
3.023973
Expected frequencies
Industry Flexibility Freedom Total pay Job security
Lodging and food services 54.0406043437205 19.67705 22.243626062323 22.9565627950897
Education/training 70.8611898016997 25.8017 29.167138810198 30.1019830028329
Financial services 27.9150141643059 10.16431 11.490084985836 11.8583569405099
Healthcare and social assis 93.7658168083097 34.14164 38.594900849858 39.8319169027384
Communications 28.6307837582625 10.42493 11.784702549575 12.162417374882
Retail trade 103.786591123702 37.79037 42.71954674221 44.0887629839471
Total 379 138 156 161
g Employee Satisfaction
Work itself Total P BAR
25 151 0.14258734655
51 198 0.18696883853
15 78 0.07365439093
69 262 0.24740321058
18 80 0.07554296506
47 290 0.27384324835
225 1059
N 1059
Expected frequencies
Industry Flexibility Freedom Total pay Job security Work itself Total
Lodging and food services 54.0406 19.67705 22.24363 22.9565628 32.082153 151
Education/training 70.86119 25.8017 29.16714 30.101983 42.067989 198
Financial services 27.91501 10.16431 11.49008 11.8583569 16.572238 78
Healthcare and social assistance 93.76582 34.14164 38.5949 39.8319169 55.665722 262
Communications 28.63078 10.42493 11.7847 12.1624174 16.997167 80
Retail trade 103.7866 37.79037 42.71955 44.088763 61.614731 290
Total 379 138 156 161 225 1059
The p-value can also determine whether the null hypothesis must be accepted
or rejected. Here, p-value is 0.523, which is greater than α= 0.05. Since, p-
value >α, we do not reject the null hypothesis. Hence, there is no evidence of
a significant relationship between the most important aspect in determining
employee satisfaction and industry.
Chi-Square Points= (Observed-Expected)^2/Expected
Industry Flexibility Freedom Total pay Job security Work itself
Lodging and food services 0.896237 0.023296 0.341563 0.166755712 1.56338918
Education/training 0.000272 1.047308 0.595363 3.390144117 1.89647352
Financial services 0.155729 0.133369 0.193241 0.386785034 0.14916104
Healthcare and social assistance 0.006255 0.289087 2.385344 0.000709279 3.19411933
Communications 0.396483 0.194766 0.125328 1.424529176 0.05916714
Retail trade 1.338552 0.038719 2.978698 4.389384102 3.46654697
Chi-square 31.22677
interpretaion:
as t stat > t critical value we will reject the null hypothesis which says
so, at 0.05 level of significance on average, the oil has some effects o
nce between the paired sample is eqaul to zero
nce between the paired sample is not eqaul to zero
ull hypothesis which says that the mean differnce between the paired sample is eqaul to zero and it goes in favour of alteranate hypothesis