Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Impulse and Frequency Response: DR Mohamed Seghier
Impulse and Frequency Response: DR Mohamed Seghier
Frequency Response
Dr Mohamed Seghier
Introduction
The impulse response and frequency response are two attributes that are useful for
characterizing linear time-invariant (LTI) systems.
➔ Knowing h(t) allows us to predict what the system's output will look like in the
time domain.
Because of the linearity and time-invariance properties:
➔ If we can decompose the system's input signal into a sum of a bunch of components,
then the output is equal to the sum of the system outputs for each of those components.
Therefore:
https://www.mathworks.com/help/dsp/ref/dsp.allpassfilter.impz.html
Convolution theorem
Convolution theorem is used to calculate a system’s output:
➔ for any signal x[n] that is input to an LTI system, the system's output
y[n] is equal to the discrete convolution of the input signal and the
system's impulse response.
A similar convolution theorem holds for continuous-time systems:
In summary:
For both discrete- and continuous-time systems, the impulse
response is useful because it allows us to calculate the output
of these systems for any input signal; the output is simply the
input signal convolved with the impulse response function.
Properties
The most important properties of a system are causality and stability
Causality
A system is causal if the output depends only on present and past, but not future inputs.
Convolution: one function is a triangle, the other is the The convolution of an exponentially decaying impulse with a
exponential impulse switched-on sine wave
Frequency response:
Likewise, a frequency response allows to calculate the effect that a system will
have on an input signal in the frequency domain.
Its inverse:
→ any time-domain signal x(t) can be broken up into a linear combination of many
complex exponential functions at varying frequencies
Or in amplitude/phase format
→ if we can decompose our input signal x(t) into a linear combination of a bunch of complex
exponential functions, then we can write the output of the system as the same linear combination of
the system response to those complex exponential functions.
Because: exponential functions are the eigenfunctions of linear time-invariant systems.
→ if you put an exponential function into an LTI system, you get the same exponential function out, scaled by a
(generally complex) value.
For an input signal with Fourier transform X(f) passed into system H to yield an output with a Fourier
transform Y(f):
So, if we know a system's frequency response H(f) and the Fourier transform of the signal that we
put into it X(f), then it is straightforward to calculate the Fourier transform of the system's output
H(f): The frequency response shows how much each frequency of the
input is attenuated or amplified by the system.
the impulse response is useful when operating in the time domain and the frequency response is
useful when analyzing behavior in the frequency domain.
The impulse [input]
In practice, it is not possible to produce a perfect impulse to serve as input for testing
in many biomedical applications.
For example, perfusion imaging: to measure blood flow, blood volume, mean transit time…etc.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jmri.20460
a: The measured tissue concentration time curve (tissue curve) gives rise to various measures of the transit time
that all depend on the local shape of the AIF.
b: Deconvolution of the curves in (a) removes the dependence on the arterial input curve and produces the
deconvolved tissue curve.
Example: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165525
Deconvolution now refers to the process of "undoing" the effect of an LTI system; i.e. you're
given the signal y(t) and you want to recover the original signal x(t).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2013.08.018
The region of interest has to be placed above renal arteries for native kidneys and on the lower aorta for transplanted
kidneys. If positioned too high into the volume, it can be hampered by inflow artifacts.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2013.08.018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2013.08.018
Quantification of renal perfusion in a patient with left renal artery stenosis. Signal intensity—time curves show the
asymmetry. By applying a two-compartment model and taking into account the AIF, perfusion maps can be obtained,
which demonstrate the asymmetry of vascularization.
Example: Predict EEG responses to two different types of stimulus/event
https://www.unfoldtoolbox.org/contenttutorials.html
Example: Creating models (regressors) for brain mapping with fMRI
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/190411911.pdf
input output