Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 3
Chapter 3
SELECTING STAFF
CHAPTER 3
INTRODUCTION
HR planning
Forecasting HR Forecasting HR
Comparing
requirement availability
Corrective Corrective
No action
measures measures
• Forecasting HR requirements (demand)
• determining the number and type of employees needed
• To determine present and future staffing needs in conjunction with job analysis and human resource
planning
• To increase the pool of applicants at minimum cost
• To increase the success rate of the (subsequent) selection process: fewer will turn out to be over- or
under-qualified
• To increase the probability of subsequent retention
• To encourage self-selection by means of a realistic job preview
• To meet responsibilities, and legal and social obligations
• To increase organisational and individual effectiveness
• To evaluate the effectiveness of different labour pools.
SELECTION
• Selection — a linked but separate practice after recruitment — then involves the
identification of the most suitable person from a pool of applicants.
• The purposes of selection:
• To obtain appropriate information about jobs, individuals and organisations in order to enable
high-quality decisions
• To transform information into a prediction about future behaviour
• To contribute to the bottom line through the most efficient and effective way to produce
service/production
• To ensure cost—benefit for the financial investment made in an employee
• To evaluate, hire and place job applicants in the best interests of organisation and individual.
RECRUITMENT METHODS
• We begin with a brief summary of the principal recruitment and selection tools and
techniques. Figure A shows some Cranet data for 2010, and national differences in word of
mouth, company websites and reliance on educational instututions. It is clear that an
internal labour market is still very dominant in Japan and, perhaps surprisingly, is also
important in the USA and the UK, despite the comments above about their strong external
labour markets.
• The use of company websites is also much higher in the traditionally external labour
market countries of the USA and the UK, but are nowhere near as important in Japan.
• In 2004 fewer than 1% of UK organisations reported using this method, but by 2010 the
proportion had grown to 20%.
FIGURE A:
Recruitment
practices for
managers in six
countries
THE RECRUITMENT PROCESS
• Human resource manager at this stage of the recruitment and selection
process is to attract a group of applicants.
12
• Recruitment occurs through both informal and formal methods. Informal methods rely on
the contacts of existing employees or on people just applying. Because they risk being
discriminatory, word-of-mouth recruitment is rarely acceptable in the public sector. In
contrast, in the business services sector, word-of-mouth recruitment is common,
particularly in those societies rated more collectivist by Hofstede and House et al
• International differences in the use of informal recruitment are substantial but it is
widespread throughout the world, especially in poorer countries. Many specialists would
defend it. Recruitment of 'family and friends' is very cheap, it aids a sense of community in
the workplace, and it provides at least the option of informal control ('If you behave like
that, you will embarrass your uncles who got you the job...').
• Formal methods are invariably more expensive than informal ones. We make specific
mention of methods of recruitment that take on more significance for international HR
managers:
• Headhunting
• Cross-national advertising
• The internet
HEADHUNTING
• Using the Internet for international recruitment has received a mixed reaction but is
slowly emerging as a useful process. Firms have faced a number of problems with web
recruitment
• The main impact can be to increase the volume of applicants, and in a time of tight
resources within HRM this is not always good news. There are then also problems with
using e-recruitment methods:
• Targeting particular populations becomes difficult. For example, in running webpages in
Singapore, applications are likely to be received from places such as Malaysia.
• Generating a larger number of applicants from more diverse social groups may lead to a need
for extensive screening activities.
• Quality becomes more variable and needs managing.
SELECTION TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES
• Organizations can choose from a wide range of selection methods, including references, interviews and
tests. Many organizations use not just one but a combination of selection practices.
• Data gathered for the Cranet project from 2010 for six key countries continued to demonstrate several
differences. They are shown in Figure B, some key differences in practice can be observed:
• Interview panels are particularly popular in the UK, the USA and Germany, but are only infrequently used in
France and Japan.
• One-to-one interviews are by far the most frequent practice in those two countries.
• Psychometric testing is relatively widespread amongst UK and Swedish organizations, but in the USA, France and
Japan only between 10% and 20% of organizations use this method.
• Some selection methods are then common in some countries but may not be used at all in others. Reflecting a
long-standing finding, graphology — reading character through handwriting — features as a method only really
in France (even here it is only used in around 12% of organizations).
• By far the most common selection method is through interviews. But other methods have recently begun to attract
more attention, such as assessment centers and psychological testing.
FIGURE B:
Selection
practices for
managers in 6
countries
INTERVIEWS
Planning the Interviews
1. The timing : how long each interview is to take and setting up a timetable accordingly
2. The venue: plan the interview room's layout and requirements to ensure the applicants able to give his best during the
interview
3. The topics for discussion: the interviewer must have a thorough understanding on the job description and specification, have
read the candidate’s application form
After Interview
• The recruitment officer will need to compare the applicants based on information collected and make his final choice of
candidates.
• The top list will be offered the job and remainder will keep aside in case the preferred applicants declines the job offer.
Interviews (cont.)
• There are also national differences in the number of people involved in the
interviews and who they are. Thus an HRM specialist would often be one of the
interviewers in northern Europe; less commonly so elsewhere. There can be
important cross-cultural differences (Sparrow 2006).
• For example, one US MNC, when recruiting managers in Korea, found that interviewers
had to be trained in cross-cultural awareness. It is the cultural norm in Korea, when asked a
'good' question, to keep silent as a sign of respect. The better the question, the longer the
period of silence the candidate maintains. In US culture, if you ask a good question and are
met with silence, you do not attribute the behaviour to respect but to ignorance. Face-to-
face interviews can create quite distorted judgements.
ASSESSMENT CENTRES
• The use of psychological tests has become an increasing problem in the international selection
field. In the pursuit of the global manager, organizations have to look outside their normal
recruitment territory in order to benchmark interview candidates. Because they are aware that
interviews or behaviourally based work simulations are subject to culturally different behaviours,
from both the candidates and the assessor, international HR managers might be tempted to use more
testing. On the surface, psychological tests may be seen as a way of avoiding the subjective bias of
other options. Indeed, greater international mobility of candidates has increased the demand for
tests to be used on job applicants from a number of different countries, and most test producers now
sell their products internationally.
• There is also the problem of fairness using testing, in which candidates to whom inappropriate
testing has been applied can find that they do not progress as well through internal selection
systems. Such discrimination is equally inappropriate. Countries also differ greatly in terms of the
practices related to user qualification, legal and statutory constraints on test use and the
consequences for those tested, and controls exercised over the use of tests.
OTHER SELECTION TEST
1. Performance Test : purpose is to check that a candidate has specific abilities that he says he has. E.g.:
driving test and computer usage test
2. Aptitude test: to discover a person’s potential abilities and talents. E.g.: accounts clerks need numerical
aptitudes
3. Personality test : measure how well the applicants will perform at the organization based on their interpersonal
skills, the motivation and inspiration that drive them, and the role that they can excel in due to their behavioral traits.
E.g.: a salesperson may be asked to take a personality test
4. Intelligence test: A questionnaire or series of exercises designed to measure intelligence. There are
many types of intelligence tests, and they may measure learning and/or ability in a wide variety of areas
and skills.
5. Medical test: to determine whether they are physically fit for the job being offered and whether they
have any diseases that could be a problem once they are employed. E.g.: a colour blindness test is
crucial for electrical and laboratory technicians
25
EXPATRIATE FAILURE AND SUCCESS
• Expatriate failure and success are obviously critical and related issues for global
firms. Considering the major determinants for expatriate failure clarifies the links to
expatriate success. First, there are three questions related to failure:
• Its definition,
• The magnitude of the phenomenon
• The costs associated with failure.
• What do we mean by expatriate failure?
• The term expatriate failure has been defined as the premature return of an expatriate (that
is, a return home before the period of assignment is completed). In such a case, an
expatriate failure represents a selection error, often compounded by ineffective expatriate
management policies.
Cross-cultural
Language
suitability
FIGURE C: Factors
in expatriate
selection Technical ability
Selection Country/cultural
decision requirements
• Techincal ability
• Naturally, an employee’s ability to perform the required tasks of a particular job is an
important selection factor. Technical and managerial skills are therefore an essential
criterion.
• Language
• The ability to speak the local language is an aspect often linked with cross-cultural ability.
Nevertheless, mastering the local language is most often not the most important
qualification with respect to languages. Lack of fluency in the corporate language,
therefore, can be a selection barrier. Prospective candidates may be eliminated from the
potential pool due to a lack of at least competency in the common language. Language
ability therefore may limit the organization’s ability to select the most appropriate
candidate.