Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Room For Debate Essay
Room For Debate Essay
Kacey Jorgenson
Professor Pettay
English 112
24 February 2022
In today's society children are awarded for simple participation for everything they do.
There's many debates on whether or not this is menatlly healthy and/or necessary for children of
any age. Children are given participation trophies and awards for everything from academics to
sports and are sometimes believed to be over awarded and celebrated. Children should not be
given participation awards because it makes them more dependent on others' thoughts of them,
ruins their work ethic, and causes them to believe they should be rewarded for everything they
do, eventually destroying their chances for success in the real world.
Children should not be given participation awards because it destroys their work ethic
and makes them feel constantly deserving of reward for everything they do. When kids are given
everything throughout their childhood they grow up to think that this is the way life works.
Ashley Merryman the co-author of “NatureShock '': New Thinking About Children and “Top
dog”: The Science of Winning and Losing says “We must focus on process and progress, not
results and rewards” (Ashley). I feel this statement correlates with my argument because it brings
up the same idea that rewards are not the most important thing for a child or for anyone in
general and that you need to work hard to get the things you want. Kids need to be taught that
Jorgenson 2
success takes hard work and commitment and that if they want to be rewarded they need to put
in the effort in order to earn the award. Participation awards destroy this work ethic and take
away praise from the children that actually deserve it. Something else that we need to teach our
kids is that “Kids need to know they don’t have to win every time. It’s O.K. to lose, to make a
mistake”. (Ashley). If kids don't always win it will make them want to work harder, Losing will
give them the drive and the want to work harder and put in my time and effort so that they will
hopefully win the next time. Always winning gets boring and gives off the impression that you
don't have to work hard or continue to put in extra effort to win, initially destroying work ethic.
How parents, coaches, and other adults around children teach and act regarding
participation leaves a big mark on their feelings about awards. Kids' feelings about winning and
getting awards whether it be first, second, third, or just participation mainly derives from what
parents and coaches teach them about awards and how they act when they receive awards. If a
parent or coach tells a young athlete that participation is a crappy award and it means nothing
then they will work harder towards receiving a First, second, or third place trophy or certificate.
On the opposite end, if they praise a kid for a simple participation award then they won't care to
shoot for anything higher because they are already getting attention and good responses to the
award they received. A good example of this reasoning aain comes from Ashley Merryman, “A
recent study found that if parents thought failure was debilitating, their kids adopted that
perspective. If parents believed overcoming failure and mistakes made you stronger, then their
children believed it, too” (Ashley). Kids believe in the same thing the trusted adults around them
do and they shape their thoughts and trustworthiness around these adults' ideas so how
coaches and parents act about the type and execution of the awards the children receive will
rub off on the athlete as well. Overpraised kids can also make for narcissistic adults late in life,
Jorgenson 3
and also hurts children with already low self-esteem issues. This idea was also argued by
Parker Abate, A sophomore athlete studying communication at Misericordia University and who
has played sports since the young age of 5 who is now a player and a coach, by stating that
“Self-esteem is a big part of one’s childhood. Watching a peer receive a trophy and not receiving
one yourself can be degrading. Any kind of honor can make a young kid feel as if he or she
meant something to the team, and that could boost the child’s self-confidence -- children today
need as much of that as they can get in our society” (Parker). If kids receive trophies for barely
doing anything it is not going to make them feel good about themselves, but make it seem as
though everyone feels bad for them, If kids have to work hard in order to get an award they will
understand the positive outcomes of hardwork and push themselves to be a better person and
player. Overall parents and coaches need to think about pushing kids harder to earn things
rather than hand them everything because it can make for a tougher dose of reality as they
grow up and cause unwanted narcissistic or drawn back behavior from their children/players
over time.
There are lots of people who oppose the opinion that kids shouldnt be given participation
awards because they believe that overall they do less harm than good. One example would be
Eric Priceman who argues that, “The whole notion that we are creating a nation of wimps
because we hand out participation trophies is only the case if we want it to be. These awards
only detract from creating a competitive society if we let them do so” (Eric). In other word, Eric
Priceman believes that giving out participation awards is healthy for children because they
detract and/or get rid of the excessive and, what some think to be, unhealthy competitiveness
that exists in today's society. I completely disagree with this belief because competition has
existed for many, many years and has never hurt anyone. The reason competition causes so
many problems for children today is because of things such as participation trophies that make
Jorgenson 4
them softer and cause them to think that they deserve an award and a sense of
accomplishment for every little thing that they do. Another statement from the opposing side
comes from a journal article by New Horizons is “Competitive life skills not only help youth to
succeed in sporting activities but if transferred can also contribute to the individual’s success in a
non-sports setting.” (Role of Sports). In my opinion regarding this statement, competitive life
skills are only helpful if they are actually competitive and not passive. Kids need to be taught and
shown how things work in the real world even from a young age so that they can be prepared and
are set up for success. Awarding kids for everything they do will only hurt them in the future;
only true winners should be giving real awards. If you create the behavior of being a winner
and/or having to win all the time you’ll also create the behavior of a crybaby and a sore loser
when they suddenly can't win everything and are not rewarded constantly as they get older.
In conclusion, children should not be given participation trophies and awards, we need to
set kids up for success in the real world and teach them real life skills such as hard
work,determination, and fair competitiveness in order for them to succeed. Participation awards
ruin and diminish all of these needy traits and turn children into needy, narcissistic, and thought
to be deserving adults. Many factors such as parents and coaches, determination, and peers that
affect how a child acts about winning and losing. Kids need to know it's ok to lose and that with
hard work and time you can be a true winner and earn awards that are actually worth something.
Jorgenson 5
Works cited
● Works Cited
doi-org.eztcc.vccs.edu/10.2.9270/NH.13.2(19).05.
● Abate, Parker. “In Youth Sports, Participation Trophies Send a Powerful Message.”
● Priceman, Eric. “There’s Nothing Wrong With Encouraging Participation With an Award.”
● Merryman, Ashley. “Forget Trophies, Let Kids Know It’s O.K. to Lose.”
Jorgenson 6