Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Language Teacher Agency: © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020 M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Teacher Education
Language Teacher Agency: © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020 M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Teacher Education
Teacher Agency as a Belief Variable 147). This definition draws attention to the fact
that teachers always exercise agency within a
From a cognitive perspective on teachers’ profes- particular context, and their agency-related oper-
sional development, teacher agency can be seen ations are embedded in the relevant social
as “a sense of control” that teachers experience practices of this particular context. In teaching,
when believing that “outcomes are contingent teachers exercise agency to engage with pupils
on their own actions” (Malmberg and Hagger and transform their understandings of the world
2009, p. 677). Teachers with agency beliefs in the forms of material knowledge and concep-
believe that they have the “skills, competences, tual tools. Malmberg and Hagger (2009) highlight
or abilities . . . to support pupils, and organize that teachers’ pedagogical experiences may
and structure the educational environment” in positively impact on their agency beliefs, helping
the pupils’ learning process (Malmberg and them to acquire a stronger sense of control in
Hagger 2009, p. 678). In this context, teachers’ supporting pupils’ learning engagement and
agency beliefs include supportive agency delivering effective instructions.
beliefs (that they can care for and support the In contrast, Edwards and D’Arcy (2004)
pupils’ learning), and instructional agency beliefs contend that pupils may also engage with and
(in delivering effective teaching). Given their transform teachers’ beliefs, knowledge, and skills
roles in sustaining teachers’ commitment to teach- when interacting with them in the learning
ing and enhancing students’ learning, teacher process. For this reason, they advance a theoriza-
agency theorized in this way is understandably tion of relational agency, which enables teachers
a much desired outcome of teacher education pro- and learners to “recognize and use the support of
grams and is seen as a key indicator of successful others . . . for action” in the learning and teaching
teacher education initiatives. Therefore, language process (Edwards and D’Arcy 2004, p. 149).
teacher education programs not only need to equip The notion of relational agency highlights
teachers with professional knowledge, skills, and the prospect that language teachers and learners
competence, but they also need to foster agency have the potential to mutually support each
beliefs among teachers that will be instrumental in other’s development as they both engage in learn-
their efforts to support language learners and facil- ing. It moves away from the individualistic nature
itate their learning. Malmberg and Hagger (2009) of agency beliefs as espoused by Malmberg and
note that language teachers’ agency beliefs also Hagger (2009), and emphasizes the social interac-
grow as a result of positive practical experiences tive nature of agency as a capacity of language
in which they overcome challenges and learn to teachers and learners. Unlike the theorization
master teaching. Thus, language teachers’ agency of agency in terms of agency beliefs that are
beliefs can be measured as a way to examine the meant to be changed through teacher education
impact of teacher education programs and practi- programs, relational agency stresses its social
cum experiences on language teachers’ profes- interactive nature and notes that its exercise is
sional development. often a mediated process. This characterization
of the notion also creates an open-ended pedagog-
ical space, where language teachers and learners
enter into mutual dialogues for better learning as
Teacher Agency as a Capacity
both are recognized to have the relevant “capaci-
ties for joint action” (Edwards and D’Arcy 2004,
Drawing on the sociocultural theory of learning,
p. 154). Methodologically, the notion of language
teacher agency can be theorized as the disposition
teachers’ relational agency requires the use of
or capacity to “engage with and transform features
methods that capture and analyze the interactions
of their worlds” (Edwards and D’Arcy 2004, p.
Language Teacher Agency 3
between language teachers and learners in the exercise of agency and reveal their efforts towards
learning and teaching process. achieving what they aspire to be as captured by
Tao and Gao (2017).
To elaborate English language teacher agency
as phenomenon/doing, this section presents a
Teacher Agency as Phenomenon/Doing
sketch of an inquiry on English for Specific
Purposes (ESP) teachers’ professional experi-
Unlike the previous conceptualization of
ences in a Chinese university (Tao and Gao
agency as a teacher’s characteristic or capacity,
2017). Drawing on the professional experiences
agency can be also seen as “phenomenon/doing,”
of a group of English for Specific Purposes
something that teachers achieve through negotia-
(“ESP”) teachers collected through retrospective
tion with contextual conditions in pursuing
interviews in a longitudinal inquiry, the inquiry
professional goals or desired pedagogic outcomes
examined how these teachers had been engaging
(Tao and Gao 2017, p. 347). While acknow-
with a shift from general English skills to English
ledging the profound contextual mediation affect-
for specific purposes in the university’s English
ing language teachers’ professional practice as
language courses. Conceptualizing agency as
advanced by sociocultural theory (Edwards
phenomenon/doing, this inquiry has focused
and D’Arcy 2004), Tao and Gao (2017) note
on the actions and efforts that the ESP teachers
the need to focus on the choices and actions
undertook to further their teaching and profes-
taken by individuals in appropriating resources
sional development. It was found that the teachers
and responding to constraints as they manage
worked hard to acquire relevant subject knowl-
their professional life and practice over time.
edge, integrate this subject knowledge into their
While such choices and actions are inevitably
language courses, and conduct research to assert
made within the opportunities and constraints of
their professional identities within the university.
temporal and social spaces, individual language
The findings also show that their exercise
teachers “enact agency through making choices
of agency was mediated by their prior experiences
about what to engage in and taking action with
(e.g., work experience in their specific industry)
different degrees of engagement to shape their
and shifting institutional conditions (e.g., the var-
own professional trajectory” (Tao and Gao 2017,
iable status of ESP as a disciplinary area of
p. 348).
inquiry). To become the kind of ESP teachers the
In addition, language teachers’ exercise of
participants aspired to be, they undertook a variety
agency is closely related to their identity aspira-
of efforts to engage themselves with learning,
tions in terms of who they would like to be, what
teaching, and research, which is what university
they would like to be seen as, and how they relate
teachers are expected to do in most Chinese uni-
to others (e.g., language learners, colleagues) in
versities. These efforts were also found to have
a given context. Such identity aspirations can be
been sustained by their identity commitment, but
seen as the goals of language teachers’ profes-
they were undermined by contextual constraints.
sional development endeavors, in the pursuit of
In short, focusing on the participants’ choices and
which language teachers exercise agency to
actions in this process, the inquiry identified the
undertake professional learning and pursue pro-
following phenomena in relation to their exercise
fessional development, mediated by their own
of agency: investing in learning, commitment
beliefs and knowledge in interaction with contex-
to teaching new curricula, and undertaking
tual conditions. This approach to language teacher
research to assert professional identities within
agency requires researchers to interpret language
the university.
teachers’ retrospective narratives or undertake
longitudinal, ethnographic inquiries so that they
may capture and understand language teachers’
4 Language Teacher Agency