Randwick International of Social Science Journal

ISSN Online: 2722-5674 - ISSN Print: 2722-5666

http://www.randwickresearch.com/index.php/rissj

0227/RISSJ-LoA/IV/2022 29st April 2022

Letter of Acceptance (LoA)

Dear author (s),

Princess Sheryn Mamucao

Mindanao State University-Maguindanao, Maguindanao, Philippine

It is my pleasure to confirm on behalf of the editorial team of Randwick International of

Social Science (RISS) Journal as well as on proxy by our publisher RIRAI, that your paper
titled “Peacebuilding and Social Work: The Narratives of Community Organizers in
Conflict-Affected Areas in Maguindanao” has been accepted for the publication in RISS
Journal, Vol. 3 No. 2, April 2022.

Very truly yours,

(Dr. Babayo Sule)

Editor in Chief of RISS Journal
Scopus Id: 57204074987
Orcid Id: 0000-0002-3879-4884
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Babayo_Sule

Randwick International Research and Analysis Institute (RIRAI) (1)

http://www.randwickresearch.com
 Randwick International of Social Science Journal
ISSN Online: 2722-5674 - ISSN Print: 2722-5666

Review Result
Manuscript Evaluation Form (Reviewer 1)

1. Title Satisfactory and Reflect the indicated of Required modifications I will answer this question
descriptive (3) the manuscript file (2) are indicated on the at a later time
manuscript file by comments
(1)
2. Abstract Conclusive (3) Describe the essence on Required modifications I will answer this question
the manuscript file (2) are indicated on the at a later time
manuscript file by comments
(1)
3. Keywords Adequate (2) Inadequate (1) Required modifications I will answer this question
are indicated on the at a later time
manuscript file by comments
4. Introduction Adequate and well states Too long and/ or Insufficient and/or explicit Required modifications are
the objective (3) unrelated to the work (2) hypothesis to be tested is indicated on the manuscript
missing (1) file by comments
5. Materials Experiments are properly Description and/ or Required modifications I will answer this question
and planted and checked (2) experiments improvable (1) are indicated on the at a later time
Methods manuscript file by comments
6. Data Data are reliable (6) Required modifications I will answer this question I will answer this question
are indicated on the at a later time (4) at a later time (1)
manuscript file by comments
(5)
7. Interpretatio Properly drawn in regard Should be adjusted (3) Inefficiently supported (2) Required modifications are
n and to methods and data (4) indicated on the manuscript
conclusion file by comments
8. Discussion The relevance of the Discussion could be Required modifications I will answer this question
research is properly improved (2) are indicated on the at a later time
discussed (5) manuscript file by comments
9. References References are properly Old- new references Required modifications I will answer this question
(3) should be incorporated (1) are indicated on the at a later time
manuscript file by comments
10. Is the paper Yes (2) NO- list the places that Required modifications I will answer this question
concisely should be especially are indicated on the at a later time
written? checked manuscript file by comments
11. English Correct and Readable (2) Poor I will answer this question
understandable to at a later time
multinational readership (3)
12. Information Original and conclusive Valuable confirmation (3) Repetition of know results Required modifications
contained (5) (1) are indicated on the
the manuscript file by comments
manuscript
13. Your Accepted in its present Could be reconsidered Could be reconsidered Rejected (Should not be
decision form after minor revision after major revision published in the journal)
14. Your The introduction provides a good, generalized background of the topic that quickly. The objective is clearly defined. The
comments literature cited is relevant to the study. The authors provide detailed analysis, I think the paper could prove to be very
interesting and useful to a very large audience, possibly making it acceptable for publication.

Randwick International Research and Analysis Institute (RIRAI) (2)

http://www.randwickresearch.com
 Randwick International of Social Science Journal
ISSN Online: 2722-5674 - ISSN Print: 2722-5666

Manuscript Evaluation Form (Reviewer 2)

1. Title Satisfactory and Reflect the indicated of Required modifications I will answer this question
descriptive (3) the manuscript file (2) are indicated on the at a later time
manuscript file by
comments (1)
2. Abstract Conclusive (3) Describe the essence on Required modifications I will answer this question
the manuscript file (2) are indicated on the at a later time
manuscript file by
comments (1)
3. Keywords Adequate (2) Inadequate (1) Required modifications I will answer this question
are indicated on the at a later time
manuscript file by
comments
4. Introduction Adequate and well states Too long and/ or Insufficient and/or explicit Required modifications are
the objective (3) unrelated to the work (2) hypothesis to be tested is indicated on the manuscript
missing (1) file by comments
5. Materials Experiments are Description and/ or Required modifications I will answer this question
and properly planted and experiments improvable (1) are indicated on the at a later time
Methods checked (2) manuscript file by
comments
6. Data Data are reliable (6) Required modifications I will answer this I will answer this question
are indicated on the question at a later time (4) at a later time (1)
manuscript file by
comments
(5)
7. Interpretatio Properly drawn in regard Should be adjusted (3) Inefficiently supported (2) Required modifications are
n and to methods and data (4) indicated on the manuscript
conclusion file by comments
8. Discussion The relevance of the Discussion could be Required modifications I will answer this question
research is properly improved (2) are indicated on the at a later time
discussed (5) manuscript file by
comments
9. References References are properly Old- new references Required modifications I will answer this question
(3) should be incorporated (1) are indicated on the at a later time
manuscript file by
comments
10. Is the paper Yes (2) NO- list the places that Required modifications I will answer this question
concisely should be especially are indicated on the at a later time
written? checked manuscript file by
comments
11. English Correct and Readable (2) Poor I will answer this question
understandable to at a later time
multinational readership (3)
12. Information Original and conclusive Valuable confirmation Repetition of know Required modifications are
contained (5) (3) results indicated on the manuscript
the (1) file by comments
manuscript
13. Your Accepted in its present Could be reconsidered Could be reconsidered Rejected (Should not be
decision form after minor revision after major revision published in the journal)
14. Your The Introduction provides rationale as to the significance of the study. The method which is chosen by the authors is
comments appropriate for the study. The author could demonstrate that the results obtained using the present method. The
discussion appears to answer the questions raised in the Introduction. It meets the journal requirements and it is hoped
that the readership of the journal will be improved through contribution of the paper.

Randwick International Research and Analysis Institute (RIRAI) (3)

http://www.randwickresearch.com