Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CSR Assignment - Instruction
CSR Assignment - Instruction
OBJECTIVES
CO PO/ EAC LO SS
MOHE Learning outcome
MOHE Domains
SOFT
SKILL
2 CO2 [PO6, LO5, PO6- The LO5- Social SS4- Ethics &
SS3];{ A4}. Engineer and Skills, Moral
Society Teamwork and Professionalis
Responsibilities m
(A)
3 CO3 [PO7, LO6, PO7; LO6- Values, SS4- Ethics &
SS4];{ A4}. Environment Ethics, Moral Moral
and and Professionalism
Sustainability: Professionalism
(A)
5 CO5 PO12- Project LO8- SS6-
[PO11, LO8, Management Management Entrepreneurial
SS6];{C5}. and Finance and Skills
Entrepreneurshi
p (C)
INTRODUCTION
PERINGATAN:
1. Dilarang menggunakan LOGO UiTM dan mengutip derma/sumbangan tanpa
kebenaran pihak UiTM.
2. Dilarang meletakkan nama dan no akaun bank peribadi untuk mengutip
derma/sumbangan.
3. Boleh membantu NGO dalam urusan mengikut derma/sumbangan atas dasar
ahli pasukkan NGO .
Example Program:
1. Conduct Survey/ Site Visit to identify the
facilities around the community
2. Webinar on Program Destini Anak
Bangsa and Program Kesedaran SDG (At
least 30 participants within 2-3 hours)
3. Collaborative with Majlis Perbendaharaan
/ JKR, Persatuan Penduduk and
company to repair the existing facilities
EVALUATION FORM
MEC600 - ENGINEER IN SOCIETY
GROUP ASSIGNMENT- SULAM, SDG & PROJECT MANAGEMENT
COMMUNICATION:
Student engagement and team
communication. The team must involve with
3 main stakeholders: Society, Industry,
Government Agency that are willing to work
together for your team’s SULAM program.
Example: Society: JKKP, Persatuan
Penduduk NGO’s or clubs, Government
Agency: Majlis Perbandaran, JKR, Syabas,
TNB etc. Industry/Company: HONDA,
TOYOTA, Huewai, Samsung etc. Provide a
formal university-community cooperation
agreement (if any).
Report requirement:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/
1pYuY8PAV_UcUNFObRLevRRvJUvbAYhtD?
usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/
1b7GWGnFd60f6WGSbY4kxfWqQr0S8Fakl?
usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1cQBl4-
9Xdtv1Ro8BNJWTWjQpvQFie_-_?usp=sharing
Instruction – Submission
1. Rename your file as your FULL NAME & ID No
2. Upload the Report File(s) in the Main Submission platforms: Google drive
3. Plagiarism check using ouriginal – will be done by lecturer
Note- Lecturer will mark your assignment base on submitting files at ouriginal
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
PO6 A Research on CSR, SULAM
WK7 and SDG
WP1, The team needs to clearly
WP6 understand the principle
underlying CSR and Low impact to society
SULAM activities Huge impact to society with
with acceptable
Huge impact to society concrete sustainable design
The CSR and SULAM sustainable
Measurement on the with concrete and details explanation
project must at least consideration and
-Impact of the impact was available sustainable design Fully support United Nation
related/aligned to one of support United Nation
activity measured with limited concern on Fully support United Sustainable Goal
United Nation Sustainable Sustainable Goal
but no sustainable sustainability and Nation Sustainable Goal
Goal (SDG) State
assessment support United Nation - Elaborate how other
Discuss the impact of
Not support United Sustainable Goal - Explain how other peoples are doing it in
CSR and SULAM in term -State how other
Nation Sustainable peoples are doing it in Malaysia as well as all over
of human society, world, peoples are doing it in
Goal - State how others Malaysia as well as all the world relevant with your
health, culture, legal, etc Malaysia as well as all
done but not relevant over the world and the selected SULAM theme and
Elaborate at least 10 over the world and the
-State the others with your CSR and challenges if your team discuss the challenges if
programs on how other challenges if your team
done in general SULAM theme want to carry out the your team want to carry out
people are doing CSR want to carry out the
activities the activities
and SULAM with aligned activities
-The CSR and -The CSR and SULAM
with SDG (Malaysia and SULAM project is project is relevant with The CSR and SULAM -The SULAM project is
Oversea) support with The CSR and SULAM
not relevant with UN UN Sustainability Goal project is relevant with relevant with UN
relevant pictures, project are relevant with
Sustainability Goal (SDG) but no UN Sustainability Goal Sustainability Goal (SDG),
systematic diagrams, UN Sustainability Goal
(SDG) discussion toward the (SDG) and discussion contain complete discussion
sketches, etc . (SDG) but no
issue toward the issue is well on the effect to the issue with
Discuss the challenges in comprehensive
presented. realistic suggestion/solution
terms of human society, discussion toward the
proposed.
world, health, culture, issue
legal, cost, etc if you team
want to carry out the
similar activities have
been done by others
PO6 B Identify Social Issue/ -Insufficient Weak -Some explanations on Acceptable CSR Good CSR explanation Comprehensive explanations
WK7 Problem /Objective & KPI Subject Knowledge the CSR concept. The explanation with limited and sufficient examples & characterization of CSR as
WP1, Suggest at least 1 on CSR problem is mentioned example. The problem on CSR implementation well as past examples The
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
WP6 problem that your team
think is worth to work on
through Community
service program.
Identify the measurable
impact: societal, health,
safety, legal and cultural Problem is clearly identified
The Problem is identified
issues and the Problem is identified with with Strong Objective and
without Objective & with Strong Objective
consequent Identification, Acceptable Objective Measurable KPI
KPI and acceptable KPI
responsibilities and Objective & KPI but without KPI
sustainable concerns to -Comprehensive
-Some level of minute -Good of minute meeting
the society of the selected -The minute -Satisfactory explanations in minute
meeting with evidence of
CSR meeting unclear of minute meeting meeting with evidence of
attendance
Specify the intellectual / attendance
physical / energy
resources of the
university to solve the
problem faced by the
community.
PO6 C Site Visit and - At least one - At least 2 stakeholders - At least 3 stakeholders - At least 3 stakeholders
WK7 Communications stakeholder involved in involved in program involved in program involved in program (Society,
WP1, Search the information - At least one program (Society, (Society, Government (Society, Government Government Agency and
WP6 through online stakeholder Government Agency, Agency and Industry) Agency, and Industry Industry)
Conduct the site visit involved in program and Industry) but not
and/or communicate with (Society, clear evidence Conduct a site visit -Conduct a site visit
a selected PIC who will Government and/or communicate and/or communicate -Conduct at least 2 site visit
involve with your program Agency, and with a selected PIC with with a selected PIC with and/or communicate with a
Provide evidence on Industry) but no -Conduct site visit last will involve with your will involve with your selected PIC with will involve
communication activities evidence minute and not program program. with your program
such as minutes of communicate
meeting, photos and link Site Visit is not effectively -The level of -The level of -The level of communicate,
video recording of conducted communicate Assess communicate Assess assess societal, health,
meeting. -The level of societal, health, safety, societal, health, safety, safety, legal and cultural
-The evident is communicate Assess legal and cultural issues legal and cultural issues issues and the consequent
COMMUNICATION: unclear societal, health, safety, and the consequent and the consequent responsibilities are
Student engagement and legal and cultural responsibilities are responsibilities are good excellence.
team communication. - Not submit issues and the satisfactory
The team must involve proposal to HEP consequent -Good on provide the -Comprehensive
with 3 main stakeholders: responsibilities are -Satisfactory Evident of activities explanations on Evident of
Society, Industry, accepted Evident of activities activities
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
Government Agency that
are willing to work
together for your team’s
SULAM program.
Example: Society: JKKP,
Persatuan Penduduk
NGO’s or clubs,
Government Agency:
-Some level of Evident
Majlis Perbandaran, JKR,
of activities - Prepare the proposal
Syabas, TNB etc. - - Prepare the proposal
earlier and discusses - Prepare the proposal earlier
Industry/Company: and discusses with
- Not Prepare with advisor earlier. and keep discusses with
HONDA, TOYOTA, advisor last minute.
the proposal earlier Submit the proposal to advisor earlier. Submit the
Huewai, Samsung etc. Submit the proposal to
and discusses with HEP within acceptance proposal to HEP before due
Provide a formal HEP within acceptance
advisor after due date. date date.
university-community date
Submit the proposal to
cooperation agreement (if
HEP but too late
any).
PO12 D Program Planning and Step by step Systematic Task were developed to A clear statement on A clear statement on vision,
development, Budget, development in development plan meet limited objective of vision, mission and mission and values were
Communication, Risk- utilise producing limited which produces the program values were systematically align to the
project management tools program task Adequate task details systematically align to task.
viii. Program Planning: information The program involves at the task
List out all the strategy & planning The program involves least 2 stakeholder The program involves at
activities to carry out at least 1 stakeholder (society, Government The program involves at least 3 stakeholders (society,
the Community The program (society, Government agency and Industry) least 3 stakeholder Government agency and
service program involves at least 1 agency and Industry) (society, Government Industry) with confirmation.
from the initial set-up stakeholder agency and Industry)
of the team, (society, Excellence level afford to get
execution, Government agency Some level affords to Satisfactory level sponsorship/ donation from
monitoring until and Industry) get sponsorship/ affords to get Good level affords to get outside parties.
measurement of the donation from outside sponsorship/ donation sponsorship/ donation
performance. The parties. from outside parties. from outside parties. More than 100%
total hour for the Poorly afford to get volunteers/participance. All
program within 6-10 sponsorship/ Evidence invited Less Stakeholder will be invited
Hours. Maybe can donation from than 40% Evidence invited 80 %
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
conduct in 2-day
example one around
4 hours and the
others day 4 hours –
depend on
programs.
ix. Collection &
Sponsorship:
Identify the strategy
& planning to get
sponsorship/
donation from
outside parties in
terms of goods
(Refer guideline for
KPI) that will be outside parties.
utilized to help a
Evidence invited 100%
person or Evidence invited volunteers/participance.
volunteers/participant. volunteer/participance. 3
establishment. Less than 20% Only invited 2
Invited 1 stakeholder Stakeholder will be
x. Participance/ volunteers/participa stakeholders.
invited Excellence in utilize the
Volunteer: Planning nt. Not invited
Some level of utilize project management tools.
and strategy to find a stakeholder. Satisfactory in utilize the
the project Good in utilize the
suitable number of project management
management tools. project management
volunteers. No of Not utilize the tools.
tools.
participant/volunteer- project
refer guideline. At management tools.
least of three (3)
stakeholders’
involvement
Government
Agencies, Industries,
Civil Society, NGOs,
Learning Institutions,
company. For
project involve
talk/seminar, the
target participant
and expected
participant must be
determined.
xi. BUDGET: Plan the
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
budget for the
materials of program
xii. Tools : List of facility
/ Tools / Equipment /
Machinery / System
invented for the
community
xiii. COMMUNICATION:
- AT PART C
xiv. RISK: Register the
risk of your program
and suggest the
prevention action.
SOP- Covid19.
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
Facebook, Twitter,
Instagram etc. Provide
the link and print screen
of the evidence. - Each
member
Target at least 30 no of
likes/ share/views.
PO12 F Implementation & Monitoring The details of Activity of the program Some level of timeline is Timeline with specific Details of overall program
Plan activity was not is available but not available without milestone been activities, time line and
Refer to part D –report the clearly identified structured. monitoring element developed responsible person and
activity before and after the department were clearly
program - At least 1 - At least 1 stakeholder - At least 2 stakeholders - At least 3 stakeholders stated
Report either your program stakeholder involved in program involved in program involved in program
deliverables are developed involved in program (Society, Government (Society, Government (Society, Government - At least 3 stakeholders
and completed, adhering to a (Society, Agency and Industry) Agency and Industry) Agency and Industry) involved in program (Society,
mapped-out plan. Government Government Agency and
xi. Actual time and Agency and -sponsorship/ donation Industry) join the program
activities of program Industry) from outside parties in -sponsorship/ donation -sponsorship/ donation
terms of goods (worth from outside parties in from outside parties in -sponsorship/ donation from
xii. List down the name Less than RM500 ) terms of goods/ cash or terms of goods/ cash/in outside parties in terms of
of your sponsorship, -sponsorship/ that will be made to in-kind (worth at least kind (worth at least acsh or in kind worth at least
collaborative donation from help a person or RM500 and above) that RM1000 and above) that RM1500 and above) that will
partnership, and outside parties in establishment will be made to help a will be made to help a be made to help a person or
other related terms of goods person or establishment person or establishment establishment
organizations (worth less than -Minimum 40 %
involved –if any. RM200 that will be volunteers/ -Minimum 60% -Minimum 80 % -Minimum 20 volunteers, at
Value of sponsorship made to help a participance from participants/ volunteers volunteers/ participant least 15 from other faculties
or other related person or other faculties and/or from other faculties from other faculties and/or outsider.
contribution must be establishment outsider. and/or outsider. and/or outsider. In total volunteer must more
reported and than 30
evidence. -No volunteers from -The expenses vs -The expenses vs Good explanation in the -Comprehensive
xiii. List the item and/or other faculties budget, Meeting budget, Meeting Minute, expense’s vs budget, explanations in in the
value from and/or outsider. Minute, Post mortem Post mortem – Meeting Minute, Post expense’s vs budget,
sponsorship some level of satisfactory level Mortem Meeting Minute, Post
/donation. The expenses vs acceptance Mortem
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
xiv. List down the
volunteer’s name
either from other
faculties and/or
outsider. The list of
actual participants
must be provided
xv. Actual expenses vs
budget
xvi. Evident of
communication
during program-
Refer part G
xvii. Challenges and
action taken during
the program budget, Meeting
Minute, Post
xviii. Certificate of
mortem unclear -Satisfactory in utilize Good in utilize the -Excellence in utilize the
Appreciation / Thank -Some level of utilize
the project management project management project management tools.
you letter to the project
Not utilize the tools. tools
participant, management tools
project -Satisfactory -Good on provide the -Comprehensive
sponsorship, -Some level of Evident
management tools. Evident of activities Evident of activities explanations on Evident of
speaker, volunteers, of activities
-The evident activities
etc unclear
xix. List of award (if any)
xx. Contribution /
Funding – Evidence
(if any)
RM - Copy of Bank
Slip / Cheque/ EFT
Letter / Note / E-mail
indicating the
contribution in the
form of In kind / Gift /
Facilities /
Equipment
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
** Evident of during and after
event activities: Photos,
Video,
PO6 H Assessment Impact of The Poor in analysis Minima in analysis Satisfactory in analysis
Excellence in analysis based
WK7 Programme based on based on based on Good in analysis based
on questionnaire /
WP1, Analysis based on questionnaire / questionnaire / questionnaire / on questionnaire /
observation / interview
questionnaire / observation / observation / observation / interview observation / interview observation / interview
WP4 (before and after the
interview (before and after the interview (before (before and after the (before and after the (before and after the
programme is conducted)
programme is conducted) and after the programme is programme is programme is
programme is conducted) conducted) conducted)
AFTER conducted) Satisfactory fill in the Good fill in the related
Excellence fills in the related
An assessment is carried out related form from ICAN, form from ICAN, HEP
form from ICAN, HEP and
right after the programme is Very poor in fill in Poor fill in the related HEP and HEA -KPT and HEA -KPT SULAM*
HEA -KPT SULAM*
conducted. the related form form from ICAN, HEP SULAM*
The participants exhibit the from ICAN, HEP and HEA -KPT
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
expected changes based on
the objectives of the
programme such as change of
attitude or increment of
knowledge / skills / aspirations. and HEA -KPT
SULAM*
SULAM*
How the programme increases
student experiences,
knowledge, attitude and skill?
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
commercialization.
Assessment Criteria
PO
Assessment Criteria Very Poor: 1-2 Poor: 3-4 Satisfactory: 5-6 Good: 7-8 Excellent: 9-10
Magazine, Media links /
blogs / Web page /
Facebook, Brochures /
pamphlet