Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Individual Assignment of HRM
Individual Assignment of HRM
Individual Assignment of HRM
An organization’s human resource management (HRM) function focuses on the people aspect
of management. It consists of practices that help the organization deal effectively with its
people during the various phases of the employment cycle: preselection, selection, and post-
selection.
The preselection phase involves planning practices. The organization must decide what types
of job openings will exist in the upcoming period and determine what qualifications are
necessary to perform these jobs. During the selection phase, the organization selects its
employees. Selection practices include recruiting applicants, assessing their qualifications,
and ultimately selecting those who are deemed to be the most qualified.
In the post-selection phase, the organization develops HRM practices for effectively
managing people once they have “come through the door.” These practices are designed to
maximize the performance and satisfaction levels of a firm’s employees by providing them
with the necessary knowledge and skills to perform their jobs and by creating conditions that
will energize, direct, and facilitate the employees’ efforts toward meeting the organization’s
objectives.
The HRM preselection practices, which are human resource planning and job analysis, lay
the foundation for the other HRM practices. In other words, firms must analyze and plan for
their treatment of workers before they can carry out the remaining HRM practices.
By HRM selection practices, we mean policies and procedures used by organizations to staff
their positions by recruiting & selection.
Organization with a competitive advantage have an identifiable part of their proposition that
allows them to achieve a greater degree of success than similar businesses in their industry.
There are many different types of competitive advantage, such as pricing structures,
manufacturing capacity, access to contacts and superior customer service.
Competitors will attempt to mitigate or neutralize a competitive advantage so the most valued
competitive advantages are those that are sustainable and strong enough to withstand external
pressures.
Competitive advantages are commonly split into comparative and differential advantages.
Comparative advantages are financial – a lower cost of manufacture, for example, or their
own distribution network. Differential advantages are product-based differences that lead
customer perceptions over quality.
HR can help create a strong competitive advantage through their personnel management
policies – productivity and employee happiness is an advantage that often results in superior
customer service, which can help drive sales and repeat customers faster than in companies
that do not provide the same service.
Cost Leadership;
Product Differentiation
Innovation Leadership;
Cost Leadership
Under a cost leadership strategy, a firm provides the same services or products as its
competitors, but produces them at a lower cost. By doing so, the organization earns a better
return on its investment in capital and human resources.
For example, Restaurants A and B sell the same number of ham-burgers at the same price.
Restaurant A can gain a competitive advantage over B if it is able to reduce it’s per unit cost,
that is, produce each hamburger at a lower cost.
A per unit cost is the cost of producing one unit of product or service. It can be reduced by
increasing the number of units produced relative to the total cost of producing them. A firm
can reduce it’s per unit cost by increasing the value of the following ratio:
Increasing the numerator or decreasing the denominator can increase the value of this ratio.
For instance, let’s say that a manufacturer of but- tons can produce 1,000 buttons at a cost of
$100. The cost of producing one button is thus $.10. One way of lowering per unit costs
would be to increase the numerator (i.e., produce more buttons) without increasing the overall
cost. For example, the firm could lower it’s per unit cost to
$.05 by producing 2,000 buttons at a cost of $100. Another way of lowering per unit costs
would be to decrease the denominator (i.e., lower total production costs) without decreasing
the number of units produced. For example, per unit cost of $.05 could be achieved by
producing 1,000 but- tons at a cost of $50.
The key question is “How could a firm accomplish this aim?” There are a number of
possible ways. For instance, using new technology or devising more efficient work methods
could increase productivity. Cutting overhead costs could decrease production costs.
Product Differentiation
Product differentiation occurs when a firm produces a product or service that is preferred by
buyers. A firm can accomplish this aim by:
Providing innovative products or services that are not offered by its competitors
Promoting and packaging its product to create the perception of higher quality
Product differentiation creates a competitive advantage if the firm’s customers are willing to
pay enough to cover any extra production costs.
For example, Restaurant A devises a way to make a better tasting hamburger by putting an
extra ingredient into the recipe. This restaurant would gain a competitive advantage if sales
increased as the result of this move and the additional revenues generated more than offset
the additional costs of producing the better tasting hamburger.
Innovation Leadership
Innovations can build a very strong basis for the sustainable development of the competitive
advantage. However, such an organization needs to change its processes, procedures, policies
and practices significantly. This strategy is the most demanding. It requires Human Resources
to change the way it works.
The organization can choose the Operational Effectiveness Strategy. The firm does not focus
externally; it streamlines processes and procedures to be quicker and agiler than competitors.
This strategy brings results but it is very difficult to implement. The leadership team has to
cross many obstacles and employees are required to change their behavior.
Human Resources has the same options. It just has to align the approach with the general
corporate strategy. HR cannot choose a different approach from the rest of the organization. It
would just result in unmanageable conflicts.
2. Selectivity in recruiting: Carefully selecting the right employees in the right way. On
average, a highly qualified employee produces twice as much as a poorly qualified
one. Moreover, by being selective in its recruitment practices, the organization sends
the message to applicants that they are joining an elite organization that has high
expectations regarding employee performance.
3. High wages: Wages that are higher than that required by the market (i.e., higher than
that paid by competitors). High wages tend to attract better-qualified applicants, make
turnover less likely, and send a message that the firm values its employees.
4. Incentive pay: Allowing employees who are responsible for enhanced levels of
performance and profitability to share in the benefits. Employees consider such a
practice to be fair and just. If all the gains generated from the employees’ ingenuity
and efforts go to top management, people will view the situation as unfair, become
discouraged, and abandon their efforts.
8. Teams and job redesign: The use of interdisciplinary teams that coordinate and
monitor their own work. Teams exert a powerful influence on individuals by setting
norms regarding appropriate work quantity and quality. Positive results from group
influences are more likely when there are rewards for group efforts, when groups have
some autonomy and control over the work environment, and when groups are taken
seriously by the organization.
9. Training and skill development: Providing workers with the skills necessary to do
their jobs. Training not only ensures that employees and managers can perform their
jobs competently, but it also demonstrates the firm’s commitment to its employees.
10. Cross-utilization and cross-training: Train people to perform several different tasks.
Having people do several jobs can make work more interesting and provide
management with greater flexibility in scheduling work. For instance, it can replace
an absent worker with one who has been trained to perform those duties.
12. Wage compression: Reducing the size of the pay differences among employees.
When tasks are somewhat interdependent and cooperation is needed to accomplish the
work, pay compression can lead to productivity gains by reducing interpersonal
competition and enhancing cooperation.
13. Promotion from within: Filling job vacancies by promoting employees from jobs at
a lower organizational level. Promotion increases training and skill development,
offers employees an incentive for doing well, and can provide a sense of fairness and
justice in the workplace.
14. Long-term perspective: The organization must realize that achieving competitive
advantage through the workforce takes time to accomplish, and thus a long- term
perspective is needed. In the short run, laying off people is probably more profitable
than trying to maintain employment security, and cutting training is a quick way to
maintain short-term profits. But once achieved, competitive advantage brought about
by the use of these HRM practices is likely to be substantially more enduring.
Conclusion
Most competitive advantages come from employees these days. The right and efficient
management of human capital brings stunning results. The company with the competitive and
fair HR Strategy has an advantage over its competitors. Employees like to work for the
enterprise, and they feel engaged and empowered. However, how should Human Resources
decide which areas will be the source of the competitive advantage?
First, Human Resources has to respect the corporate strategy but it can still choose to deviate
slightly from the general organization’s approach. Even a low-cost company can pay higher
salaries than competitors because it manages employees better. It can decrease costs by the
increased productivity and performance. Even in the severe cost management environment
the compensation policy can offer the wider range of reward opportunities to managers just
because they can be asked to deliver more in return. It is just about the smart approach of
Human Resources. It has to make sure that employees produce a higher value added to ensure
that the company operates with lower costs than competitors.
The HR Leader has to make sure that the leadership team supports the general approach of
the HR Strategy. They have to trust that the successful implementation will bring benefits.
They have to accept to change themselves, as well.
Second, the HR Leader or the HR Strategist has to decompose the business strategy. They
have to identify the right spots for Human Resources to kick in. They have to prepare the plan
that will lead to the development of the sustainable, attractive corporate culture. The people
do not like processes; they love emotions. They have to like the company. They must be
proud of the brand name. Human Resources has to help the leader of the business to shape a
vision of the company and its mission statement. This will always set the burning platform
for the HR Team. They will like to design, implement and cultivate the environment that acts
as the primary source of the Competitive HR advantage.
Reference
1. Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive Advantage through People. Boston: Harvard Business School
Press.
2. Book, Kleiman 6th Edition, Chapter 1 Human Resource Management and Competitive
Advantage
3. https://www.hrzone.com/hr-glossary/what-is-a-competitive-advantage
4. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/competitive_advantage.asp
5. https://hrmhandbook.com/hrm/hr-strategy/competitive-advantage/