Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0950061815000409 Main PDF
1 s2.0 S0950061815000409 Main PDF
h i g h l i g h t s
Using natural pozzolana and volcanic ash in concrete production may reduce Portland cement consumption.
At low to moderate replacement level, these two pozzolanas provide satisfactory performance.
Overall, SA pozzolana seems to perform better than NP.
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Designing a sustainable concrete has become a vital requirement for today’s concrete. Introducing vari-
Received 4 August 2014 ous cementing and pozzolanic materials in concrete in replacement of Portland cement seems to be the
Received in revised form 18 December 2014 appropriate way to lower the environmental impact of concrete industry.
Accepted 4 January 2015
This paper reports results on concrete performance produced with two types of pozzolanas including
Available online 21 January 2015
natural pozzolana (NP) obtained from volcanic ash and shale ash (SA) used, in various proportions ranged
from 10–45%, as a partial substitute of Portland cement (PC). Concrete mixtures were designed with a
Keywords:
wide range of water-to-cementitious ratios (w/c) ranged from 0.79 to 0.45. The key mechanical proper-
Carbonation
Chloride diffusion
ties and durability performance of binary blended cement concretes were investigated.
Compressive strength Using both NP and SA has resulted in a strength loss; while SA seems to perform better than NP in
Drying shrinkage terms of strength development and durability performance. The blended cement concretes with 10–
Freeze–thaw 15% pozzolanas was found to have a good resistance to carbonation and chloride ions ingress and are
Natural pozzolana freeze–thaw durable. However, with replacement level higher than 20%, the durability factor, chloride
Portland cement ions and carbonation resistance drop down.
Setting time Overall, the results indicate that the mechanical and durability performances of binary blended
Shale ash
cements with NP and SA are strongly linked to their intrinsic characteristics including chemical compo-
Volcanic ash
sition, fineness, particle size distribution and potential reactivity.
Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.020
0950-0618/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
74 M. Seddik Meddah / Construction and Building Materials 79 (2015) 73–82
SCMs used as a partial replacement of Portland cement (PC) are 3. Experimental work
now well established. In 2006, around 300 million tonnes of vari-
ous natural pozzolanas were estimated available while only 50% 3.1. Materials
are used [5].
The BS EN 197-1 (2000) identifies type II cements (CEMII/A-LL Portland cement CEM I 42.5 N conforming to EN 197-1:2000
32,5/42,5) that may contain various materials as main constitu- was used in all control mixtures while various proportions of NP
ents, in percentages ranging from 6% to 35%. Natural pozzolana, and SA were added as a partial substitution of PC to obtain binary
fly ash, slag and limestone are the main materials that are permit- binders. These binary binders were formulated varying the
ted by the EN 197-1. replacement (by weight) of PC by NP from 0% to 45% and the
Natural pozzolanas such as diatomite have been widely used as replacement of SA from 0% to 40%. The Natural Pozzolana used is
a partial substitute of Portland cement in many applications a volcanic dust with a rough surface texture while the burnt shale
because it contains reactive SiO2 and due to their beneficial effects ash has a high inherent fineness. The chemical and mineralogical
including reduction in heat evolution, decreased permeability and compositions along with physical properties of PC and the two
increased resistance to chemical attack [6,7]. However, NP are pozzolanic admixtures (NP and SA) used are given in Table 1;
often associated with a reduction in early-ages strength [8–10] and their particle size distribution are shown in Fig. 1. Both NP
but an improved hydration and strength at medium and later ages and SA used could, relatively, be considered as high siliceous.
when moist-cured for longer time [11]. Adding 10% raw diatomite Two size fractions of 5–10 mm and 10–20 mm of crushed gran-
to PC resulted in a comparable strength with respect to the refer- ite were used as coarse aggregate (CA) while river sand 0–5 mm
ence concrete while beyond this limit, compressive strength was used as fine aggregate. To obtain a nominal targeted slump
decreases due to the high water demand induced by the increased value of 75 ± 5 mm, a superplasticizer conforms to BS 5075: Part
fineness. The strength development of diatomite concrete was 3 with a proper content (expressed by % of weight of cement)
reported to increase depending on the increased diatomite content was introduced while an air-entraining agent conforming to BS
and reactive silica content [12]. 5075: Part 2 was used for the purpose of freeze–thaw resistance
Recent results revealed that ternary system containing 20% of air-entrained concrete.
limestone (LS) filler and 30% NP has led to improved early and
long-term compressive and flexural strengths and enhanced dura-
bility against sulphate, acid and chloride ions ingress [11]. 3.2. Details of mixtures, concrete mixing and specimens
The use of shale ash is, however, limited and shown less success
and efficiency compared to the other types of pozzolanas. Several Both PC and binary concretes were designed with a wide range
authors [13,14] have reported that the use of burnt shale in cement of water to cementitious materials (w/c) of 0.79, 0.65, 0.60, 0.52
pastes increased the water demand and prolonged the setting time. and 0.45. The cement content was varying from 235 to 410 kg/
The burnt shale ash has a low pozzolanic activity which results in a m3. The total coarse aggregate content was kept constant
lower strength development of concrete/mortar compared to con- (1200 kg/m3) while the fine aggregate content was slightly
trol mixture as reported by some authors [13,15]. Meanwhile, adjusted to maintain the yield. Table 2 provides the mix propor-
Baum et al. [16] have found that shale ash concrete exhibited less tions of both PC and binary cements concretes investigated. All
shrinkage than PC concrete while Bentur and Grinberg [14] have concrete mixtures were produced in a planetary concrete mixer
reported that shale ash increased drying shrinkage of concrete. and were appropriately labelled as given in Table 2. After mixing,
In this paper, the effect of volcanic ash and shale ash on con- slump test was carried out before concrete was cast in the moulds.
crete performance is investigated. Attention is particularly directed For all concretes types, three samples of both Portland cement
to the key mechanical and durability performances of concrete and binary cement concretes containing natural pozzolana and
specimens made with these two types of SCMs as a partial substi- shale ash, referred to as PC, NP and SA respectively, are examined.
tute of Portland cement. The results presented herein are part of an Blended mixtures NP and SA label are followed by a number desig-
extensive research project aims to develop concrete made with nating the replacement level of PC by NP and SA. Concrete speci-
various Portland-composite cements. mens were cast in metal moulds (cubes, cylinders and prisms) in
Table 1
2. Research significance
Chemical composition and physical properties of cement and pozzolanas used.
Table 2
Mixture composition for 1 m3 of PCNP and PCSA concretes.
wards, specimens were sealed, from all sides, using a bituminous increase of the amount of superplasticizer required to reach the
coating paint except the top side of the specimen which was targeted slump value. As could be seen in Table 2, the use of both
exposed, in a carbonation tank, to a CO2 enriched atmosphere con- NP and, especially SA has resulted in a significant increase of the SP
taining 4% of CO2 at 20 ± 2 °C and 55 ± 5% of RH. The depth of car- content to reach the target slump value. In fact, the major factor
bonation in the tested concrete was measured by applying a affecting the SP demand in such a cementing system is mainly
phenolphthalein colour indicator spray on a freshly broken piece the physical properties of the pozzolana used including shape,
of the specimens after 2, 4, 8, 12 and 20 weeks of exposure. This the particle size distribution, the specific surface area, the amount
turns non-carbonated concrete pink, and remains colourless in car- of ultrafine particles in the mixture and its chemical composition,
bonated concrete. The depth of the uncoloured zone of the con- particularly the amount of unburned carbon. As for the two pozzol-
crete (the carbonated layer) from the edges of broken piece is anas investigated herein, SA has significantly increased the amount
measured at 3 points and the mean value is reported as the carbon- of SP required (double even more for some mixtures) compared to
ation depth. NP. This increase of SP demand is mainly attributed to the high
specific surface area and considerable amount of ultrafine particles
3.3.4. Chloride ions penetration in SA used which requires high content of SP for a better lubrica-
Chloride ions ingress was measured across slice of concrete tion and dispersion of SA particles. In terms of workability, it seems
specimens measuring 100 mm Ø and 25 mm thick. These slices that the use of blended cement with NP is more advantageous than
were cut from a concrete cylinder 150 300 mm wet-cured for the SA.
14 days. The tested slices were located in a standard two compart- On the other hand, all blended cements tested showed longer
ments diffusion test cells. The inner part of the cell was filled with initial setting time compared to Portland cement as could be seen
calcium hydroxide solution and the cell was partially immersed in in Table 3. The delay in setting time was, to some extent, more pro-
a chloride tank, thereby exposing the outer face of concrete to the nounced for SA than for NP. The PC mix had the shortest setting
chloride solution. The electrochemical chloride ingress test method time with 105 min while NP45 had the longest initial setting time
used called potential difference, where a potential difference of with 198 min, followed by the SA30 with 188 min. Obviously, the
7.5 V is passed across the specimen. The chloride transport rate delay in setting time for mixes with NP and SA compared to the
is evaluated from frequent chloride analysis of the liquid in the PC mix is attributed to their low early-age reactivity compared to
two chambers. The Fick’s first law was used to calculate the chlo- clinker. In fact, setting time is intimately related to the hydration
ride diffusion coefficient (Eq. (1)) and the coefficients were derived kinetics of the cementing system which is also linked to the reac-
from steady-state diffusion experiments. tivity of the pozzolana used and hence, to its chemical composi-
tion. Using NP and SA would lower the clinker-free lime and C3A
@c
Q ¼ Dc ð1Þ content in the mixtures and results in a delayed setting time.
dx
where Q is the mass transport rate one square-metre of concrete
(mol/m2/s), Dc is the diffusion coefficient (m2/s), c is the total chlo-
ride concentration in the pore water (mol/m3), t is the time, and x is 4.2. Mechanical properties
the distance from the exposed surface (m).
Tables 4 and 5 show the compressive strength results of the
3.3.5. Initial surface absorption (ISA) tested concrete mixtures. Obviously, for both control and blended
This test consists of the measurement of the rate at which water cement concretes, increasing the curing time and decreasing the w/
flows into the capillary pore network of concrete through a known c of concrete has resulted in a substantial increase in the compres-
surface area. Estimation of the volume flow is obtained by mea- sive strength. Regardless of the w/c and concrete’s age, the use of
surement of the length of flow along a capillary of known dimen- various amounts of NP and SA has led to a reduction in the com-
sion. The initial surface absorption of the investigated mixes was pressive strength. This reduction in the compressive strength of
determined on 150 mm cubes after the concrete was water-cured blended cement concretes is proportional to the amount of pozzo-
for 28 days as per BS 1881-208 Part 5. The specimens were oven- lana added and was more pronounced when high content (over
dried at 105 °C to constant weight prior to the test and left to cool 30%) of pozzolanas was embedded in the mixture. For the same
to the laboratory temperature (17–20 °C) in a desiccator for a per- replacement level of 30%, it was found that the use of NP has led
iod of 24 h. The contact area is defined by a plastic cell sealed onto to a larger reduction in the compressive strength compared to
the concrete surface and should not be less than 5000 mm2. Water the SA.
is introduced into the cell via a connecting point and maintained at The use of SA in concrete mixes seems to perform better than
a head of 200 mm using a filter funnel. A second connection point mixes with NP and has less negative effect on the compressive
to the cap leads to a horizontal capillary tube. The connection to strength. Meanwhile, the use of 10% of SA has an insignificant
the reservoir is closed and the absorption is measured by observing effect on the compressive strength while beyond this limit, impor-
the movement of the end of the water line in the capillary tube tant strength loss was recorded.
with an affixed scale at 10 min. The ISA measurements were taken
at 10 min after the initiation of the test and the measurements are
referred to as ISA-10 at 10 min. More details about the testing and Table 3
Consistency and initial setting time of PC and blended cements
setup used could be found in earlier publication by the author [17].
used.
Table 4
Compressive strength of the PCNP concretes.
Table 5
Compressive strength of the PCSA concretes.
For all the PCNP mixtures, the strength loss was ranging from around 27% compressive strength reduction which is relatively in
11% to 62% while for the PCSA mixtures, the strength loss was agreement with the present results.
ranging from around 1% to 57% depending on the w/c, concrete’s In fact, it is well recognised that when blended cements are pro-
age and the pozzolana content. The obtained results indicate that duced by intergrinding clinker together with the cementitious
to limit the reduction effect on the compressive strength, it is rec- materials (genuine blended cement), the resulted performance sur-
ommended to use a maximum of 20% SA and 15% NP or lower. pass the one mixed separately in the concrete mixer.
Available results [18,19] showed that pre-mixed blended lime- Obviously, mechanical performance of any cementing system is
stone or NP-cements with low PC replacement level up to 15% strongly linked to its reactivity which in turn linked to the chemi-
could slightly improve compressive strength, or at least led to com- cal composition and intrinsic characteristics of each cementitious/
parable strength to the PC concrete. On the other hand, López and pozzolana material. The chemical composition given in Table 1
Castro [20] have found that mixtures with 33% NP have led to showed that NP has relatively high LOI of 6.4% which could be con-
78 M. Seddik Meddah / Construction and Building Materials 79 (2015) 73–82
w/c particles are, the higher the reactivity will be. The results shown
28 days PCNP in Tables 4 and 5 and Figs. 2 and 3 indicate that SA was relatively
0.79
70
0.65 more reactive than NP used. In fact, Fig. 1 shows also that NP par-
ticles are slightly coarser than their corresponding PC and SA.
Compressive strength, MPa
60 0.60
One major distinction between the two pozzolanas materials
50 0.52
used (NP and SA) to be noted is their kinetic of reaction. Using
0.45 NP has resulted in an increasing rate of strength loss up to 7 days
40
followed by a decreasing rate of the strength loss onwards. Never-
30 theless, a decreasing trend of the strength loss over time was
observed when the SA was used. It could be speculated that NP
20
has a predominant negative effect at early ages (up to 7 days)
10 which turns into a positive effect at later-ages while SA has a
decreasing rate of the strength loss with extending curing time.
0 Indeed, the addition of pozzolanic materials is expected to
0 10 20 30 40 50 improve the interface properties by a pozzolanic reaction and a fill-
NP content, % ing effect and hence, improving the strength and impermeability of
Fig. 2. Compressive strength development of Portland and natural pozzolana the concrete. However, this improvement depends on the pozzola-
cement concretes. nic materials parameters including reactivity, oxide composition
and the amount of pozzolana used which could affect its pozzola-
nicity and hence, determine its pozzolanic activity index (ASTM
w/c C311). The relative strength, which represents the relation of
28 days strength of a given mix at a given age to the strength of the refer-
70 PCSA 0.79
ence mix, may indicate the degree of pozzolanicity and the overall
0.65
Compressive strength, MPa
Table 6
Relative compressive strength of the binary concrete mixtures.
ISA-10, m/m2/sec 10 -2
SA-0.60 60
80
SA-0.45 50
60 40
30
40
20
20 PC NP15
10
NP30 NP45
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 50 100 150 200
Pozzolanas content, % Age, days
Fig. 4. Effect of natural pozzolana and shale ash contents on the ISA. Fig. 5. ISA versus time for natural pozzolana concretes.
80 M. Seddik Meddah / Construction and Building Materials 79 (2015) 73–82
40 NP45
Obviously, freezing-thawing durability factor increases as
35 strength increases and permeability decreases. The results
obtained revealed that permeability to chloride increases and com-
30 NP30 pressive strength decreases when increasing the replacement level
of PC by NP or SA above 15%. Similarly, the DF seems to drop down
25
NP15 when the replacement level of PC by NP is higher than 15% while
20 mixes with SA showed an adequate DF of 85.4 even at 20% replace-
PC ment level. It could be speculated that the combination PCSA has
15 provided an appropriate particle packing and strength develop-
10 ment which contributed in the satisfactory DF obtained with this
mixes. Moreover, the use of SA seems to produce more secondary
5 C–S–H gel and denser than the PCNP mixes, which indeed refine
the capillary pores and enhances durability performance of the
0
PCSA concrete.
0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70
w/c
5. Conclusions and recommendations
Fig. 8. Coefficient of diffusion of concrete made with various NP contents at
different w/c.
Two types of pozzolanas (volcanic and shale ashes) were exam-
ined in terms of mechanical and durability performances when
used in binary concretes. Based on the test results reported herein,
45 PCSA PC SA20
the following concluding remarks can be made:
Coefficient of diffusion, ×10-11 m 2/sec
[6] Rodriguez-Camacho RE. Using Natural Pozzolans to Improve the Sulfate [19] Voglis N, Kakali G, Chaniotakis E, Tsivilis S. Portland-limestone cements. Their
Resistance of Cement Mortars. In: Malhotra VM, editor. International properties and hydration compared to those of other composite cements. Cem
Conference, Bangkok, Thailand. ACI SP 178–53; 1998. p. 1021–1040. Concr Compos 2005;27(2):191–6.
[7] Yılmaz Bülent, Ediz Nezahat. The Use of Raw and Calcined Diatomite in [20] López M, Castro JT. Effect of natural pozzolans on porosity and pore
Cement Production. Cem Concr Compos 2008;30(3):202–11. connectivity of concrete with time. Rev Ing Constr 2010;25(3):419–31.
[8] Mehta PK. Studies on blended Portland cements containing Santorin earth. [21] Meddah MS, Zitouni S, Belaâbes S. Effect of size and content of coarse
Cem Concr Res 1981;11(4):507–18. aggregate on the compressive strength of concrete. Constr Build Mater
[9] Massazza F. Pozzolanic Cements. Cem Concr Compos 1993;15(4):185–214. 2010;24(4):505–12.
[10] Tagnit-Hamou A, Petrov N, Luke K. Properties of concrete containing [22] Meddah MS, Tagnit-Hamou A. Evaluation of rate of deformation for early-age
diatomaceous earth. ACI Mater J 2003;100(1):73–8. concrete shrinkage analysis and time zero determination. ASCE J Mater Civ Eng
[11] Ghrici M, Kenai S, Said-Mansour M. Mechanical properties and durability of 2011;23(7):1076–86.
mortar and concrete containing natural pozzolana and limestone blended [23] Meddah MS, Tagnit-Hamou A. Pore structure of concrete with mineral
cements. Cem Concr Compos 2007;29(7):542–9. admixtures and its effect on self-desiccation shrinkage. ACI Mater J
[12] Stamatakis MG, Fragoulis D, Csirik G, Bedelean I, Pedersen S. The influence of 2009;106(3):241–50.
biogenic micro-silica-rich rocks on the properties of blended cements. Cem [24] Meddah MS, Lmbachiya MC, Dhir RK. Potential use of binary and composite
Concr Compos 2003;25(2):177–84. limestone-cements in concrete. Constr Build Mater 2014;58:193–205.
[13] Smadi M, Yeginobali A, Khedaywi T. Potential uses of Jordanian spent oil burnt [25] ASTM C494/C 494M-99. Standard specification for chemical admixtures for
shale as a cementive material. Mag Concr Res 1989;41(148):183–90. concrete, ASTM Committee C09. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM
[14] Bentur A, Grinberg T. Hydration and properties of pastes and mortars made Standards; 1999.
with oil-burnt shale. Am Ceram Soc Bull 1982;61(12):1296–300. [26] Aïtcin P-C. Binders for durable and sustainable concrete. Taylor & Francis;
[15] Kheddaywi T, Yeginobali A, Smadi M, Cabrera J. Pozzolanic activity of 2008.
Jordanian oil shale ash. Cem Concr Res 1990;20(6):843–52. [27] Zia P, Ahmad S, Leming M, Schemmel J, Elliott R. Mechanical behaviour of high
[16] Baum H, Soroka I, Bentur A. Properties and structure of oil-shale ash pastes I: performance concrete: very early strength of concrete, Report SHRP-C-363, V3,
composition and physical features. Cem Concr Res 1985;15(2):303–14. 1993, Strategic Highway Research Program. Washington DC: National
[17] Limbachiya MC, Meddah MS, Ouchagour Y. Use of recycled concrete aggregate Research Council; 1993. p. 117.
in fly-ash concrete. Constr Build Mater 2012;27(1):439–49. [28] Richardson DN. Quick test for durability factor estimation. Missouri University
[18] Güneyisi E, Gesoglu M, Özturan T, Mermerdas K, Özbay E. Properties of of Science and Technology & Missouri Department of Transportation; 2009. p.
mortars with natural pozzolana and limestone-based blended cements. ACI 113.
Mater J 2011;108(5):493–500.