Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Iso 9001:2015 Transition Guide: Instructions For Use
Iso 9001:2015 Transition Guide: Instructions For Use
Iso 9001:2015 Transition Guide: Instructions For Use
This document is intended to help organisations to manage the transition between ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 9001:2015, or, it can be used to
assist an organisation looking to implement a quality management system from the start.
It is not the standard – you will also need a copy of the standard because the information given under the column significant requirements, has
been paraphrased, not copied. ISO 9001:2015 is a copyrighted document and as such cannot be reproduced in full.
The suggested actions column is designed to help an organisation to decide what they need to do with their existing system in order to bring it in
line with the 2015 version of the standard. Not knowing what your existing system looks like, makes it difficult to be specific but I hope there will
be a few ideas that may help you.
www.cpatraining.co.uk
4.1
You will need to write this
Understanding down somewhere (the
the organisation New requirement quality manual is an option)
What do you do as an organisation? Do you
and its context so that others can read it
manufacture products, are you a service
Identify internal and external issues and understand a bit about
organisation, etc. What are the key factors that
that are relevant to your ability to you and your business.
impact on you as a business? Is it customers,
achieve intended results – include Your strengths and
new product development, legislation,
future monitoring of these issues weaknesses. In fact, it is a
overseas influence, cost of raw materials?
good idea to do a SWOT
analysis or something
similar.
4.2
New requirement
As above, you need to
Understanding You need to identify which organisations, personalise this and
Identify interested parties that are
the needs and groups of people, regulatory bodies, etc. affect document it. Don’t forget,
relevant to and/or support the
expectations of what you do. This could include employees, things change so you will
strategic direction of your
interested customers, neighbouring businesses, and need to do this more than
organisation – include future
parties society in general. once – why not at
monitoring of these parties
management review?
4.3
4.2.2
The scope can be important
Determining the This is not new to 9001:2015 but it has been as it tells others what
The scope of the QMS must be
scope of the formalised. Clearly, 4.1 & 4.2 will have an activities you are certificated
defined – taking into account 4.1 &
quality effect on the scope. It is quite likely that the for.
4.2 above.
management existing scope you have will remain unchanged If there are any clauses not
system but it is an opportunity to revisit it and amend if included in the system, you
The scope is to be available and
required. must explain why they are
any exclusions justified
not applicable.
4.4 4.2
ISO 9001:2015 does not
Quality The quality management system Your QMS should be constructed around the require a documented
management must be built around the processes processes of your organisation – it always quality manual or
system and its of your organisation. The inputs and should have been, it makes more sense to do documented procedures.
processes outputs, sequence and interaction so rather than slavishly following the clause However, it does require
are to be defined. numbers of the standard as many have done you to ‘provide confidence
previously. that processes are being
These processes must be Get together with a few key people in the carried out as planned’.
monitored and measured and organisation and sketch out a simple flowchart Ultimately, it will be your
documented to the extent which depicts the key stages of the business decision as to whether you
necessary to support their e.g. sales followed by design, then purchasing, keep the manual and
operation. etc. procedures but you can
Then decide how you will control each of the expect more probing
There must be documented processes identified. The most common questions from an auditor if
information available to provide method used is to have documented they are not there as s/he
confidence that the processes are procedures, although these are no longer will need to seek other
being carried out as planned. mandated by ISO 9001. assurances regarding the
control of your processes.
5.1
You can expect the auditor
5.1, 5.2 & New requirement
Leadership and to want to talk to top
The new element here is leadership. Top
commitment management more than
Top management still required to management must demonstrate that they are
was previously the case.
demonstrate their commitment to ‘on board’ and involved in leading the activities
S/he will want to hear from
the QMS, their focus on customer required by the standard such as attending
top management their views
satisfaction and now also their management review, dealing with quality
on quality and why the
ability to lead quality initiatives issues at a senior level, supporting the quality
policy says what it does and
manager when required.
how that translates into day
to day actions.
5.2
These changes shouldn’t
5.3
Quality policy cause much of a problem
This requirement is very similar to the previous but it raises the question “do
Policy to be appropriate to the
version except that it requires the policy to we know the strategic
purpose and context of the
support the ‘strategic direction’ of the direction of the
organisation and to support the
company. It also requires the policy to be organisation?” If there is a
strategic direction of the company. It
communicated and understood internally and business plan, however
must also be communicated
available to external parties as required. simple, it could be
demonstrated that it
supports the quality policy.
5.3
5.5
Job descriptions are still not
Organisational mandatory but they an
Top management to define roles, No significant differences here, the
roles, example of how roles and
responsibilities and authorities – requirement for a specific management
responsibilities responsibilities could be
specifically the responsibilities for representative has gone but the activities that
and authorities defined. As are procedures
maintaining the QMS were required of him/her are still there.
which allocate specific tasks
to nominated people.
6.2
6.3 5.4.2
There is no real change here, just apply the
Planning of When changes occur, they must be No comment
risk management concept to any changes that
changes planned and consideration given to
are planned in order to better manage the
the potential consequences of those
changes.
changes
7.1.1/7.1.2 6.1
The only change here is the addition of People
Resources Resource needs to be determined No comment
as a resource.
and provided, including people
7.1.5 7.6
This is what was previously under control of
Monitoring and Any measuring equipment used to
monitoring and measuring equipment – or
measuring determine conformity with
calibration as we often know it. No significant
resources requirements to be calibrated. No comment
changes again, just measurement traceability
Where applicable, measurements to
has been separated out, suggesting that it may
be traceable to International of
not always be necessary.
National standards
7.1.6 New Requirement This is a completely new requirement and it A responsibility matrix
relates to how the organisation would deal with would help – list the roles
Organisational Establish the knowledge needed to the loss of key resources (people). It could tie on 1 axis and the people on
knowledge operate the processes in order to in with ‘succession planning’ and also the other. This should help
achieve requirements and satisfy ‘business continuity’ planning. Access to identify where you have
customers – consider succession suitable resource could come from external cover and where you do
planning sources e.g. temporary workers. not.
8.3 Possibly the clause which causes more There should be very little to
concern than most others. The structure of the do for those who already
Design and 7.3 clause has been re-modelled a little but the have design procedures in
development of concepts are the same. First plan how the place. Those who have
products and The design process must consider design will evolve, take the inputs and produce previously claimed not to be
services the risk and complexity of product or a draft design, including what methods will be involved in design when
service to be provided. Establish a used to control the design. The design outputs really they are, will need to
design plan and obtain the design e.g. drawings/specifications/BOM’s can then get a system developed and
inputs, produce the outputs, review be reviewed and verified as being suitable (or implemented sooner rather
to ensure the outputs meet the not, in which case it goes around the loop than later.
inputs and verify that it meets again). From there, the design can be verified
requirements. If required, validate by tests or calculations or the use of models
the design before use and control and simulation for example. Consideration
any changes that may be made. should be given to validating the design in the
‘real world’ e.g. running a full scale
implementation and also consider how
changes to designs will be managed.
8.5.1 7.5
Make sure that you have methods of working
which give confidence that the product or
Control of Little change in this section. It No changes should be
service will be correct. This might include work
production and includes ensuring that operations necessary to meet this
instructions or job cards etc., providing
service are carried out ‘under controlled clause.
additional information on how to carry out a
provision conditions’ and where the outcomes
task. This should dovetail well with your
cannot be inspected or tested fully,
system for ensuring people are competent too.
the processes and equipment and
people need to be validated.
Identification and traceability are both
unchanged – traceability is only required where
8.5.2 Other sub-clauses include the No changes should be
it is a stated requirement – typically this might
identification of items at all stages necessary to meet this
be a legal requirement as in food production or
and if applicable, batch traceability. clause.
a customer requirement.
8.6 8.2.4
8.7 8.3
Your existing NC system
Slight changes in the wording but still requires
Control of Segregation and containment are should work fine with the
detailed control over the handling of products
nonconforming now options for addressing new standard – but only if
or services that don’t meet the specification
outputs nonconforming outputs and there is you use it! Perhaps start by
laid down for them. There is more detail
more detail regarding the records to documenting some of the
required when it comes to completing the
be kept regarding nonconformities larger problems you have
documentation following discovery of a
and then spread out to the
nonconformity but it is still the same concept.
rest of the system.
9.3 5.6
A good management review process is vital if
Management Still requires a management review Re-visit your agenda, the
your QMS is to be effective. We now need to
review to be performed but there is a more new standard requires more
see the involvement of senior management
comprehensive list of topics to be topics to be included. Make
more than ever before (see Leadership) and
discussed now – linked to risk and sure senior management
make sure that you produce outputs from the
to internal and external issues (4.1 are present and produce
reviews or it is simply a ‘talking shop’.
& 4.2) outpts.
10.2 8.5.2
10.3 8.5.1
No real changes here but it does refer to other As long as you are
Continual Whilst the wording has changed, monitoring and measuring activities which can participating in improvement
improvement the requirement to seek continual be used to generate data and this can be programmes there should
improvement remains analysed to determine how well or not be little or nothing else to
processes are working. add.