Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Afwal - TR 81 3041 - Vol I
Afwal - TR 81 3041 - Vol I
Afwal - TR 81 3041 - Vol I
com
A101657
AFWAL.TR-T1.3041
VOLUME 1
April 1981
-D' NOTICE
AU CONTRACT O
Sý0IF-0 GRA~NT UMNER(a)
J. M. /Ogonowski -- 7
ibe'oSwPt) G ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10 PROGRAM ELEMENT.'PROJECT, TASK
McDonnell Aircraft Company AREA A WORK UNIT NUMBERS
P.O. Box 516 P.E. 62201F
St. Louis, Missouri 63166 W.U. 24010110
I.CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME: AND ADDRESS
Flight Dynamics Laboratory (AFWAL/FIBEC) j [ Ap
Air Force Wright Aej:onautical Lab. (AFSC) Ur PAGES
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433 144
14 MONITORING AGENCY NAME & Ar)ORESS(It different fron. Controllin4 Olfice) 15. SECURITY CLASS. (of it . report)
7, 1
Jnclassif ied
IS. DE C ASSI FICATION/ DOWNGRADING
SCHEDULE
17, DISTRIBUTION ST 4ENT (of abstract eentered in Block 20, If different froe. Report) 4
C'
19. KE V WORDS Zonllnuie or reverse side if neciiesli znd Identify iiy black numbwr)
DI I JAN 3o 1473
SECURITt' CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Data Entered)
Li"-T 7 . ! Cm11
- ... ,
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
FOREWORD
Dr ýC T'.I_
Di st ribution /
AvailmbilitY Codes .
nn," or
iii9
IL
I
I••.••
"..
"-- .•
."•mm ••--4`*•• •.•.. '..L4"
-••`.-- • ••••.•
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
TABLE OF COI4rENTS
Section P_
I INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1. BACKGROUND ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2. METHODOLOGY DEVELCPMENT ........... ... 5
3. PREDICTIONS USING BJSFM APPROACH. . . . . . . ... 15
V
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Section age
vi
-i
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
LIST OF ILLUSTRATrIoNS
Figure Page
vii
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Frigure P _
21 MCAIR Evaluation of Loaded Hole Specimens
Test Matrix ............. .................... 30
39 Variations of Two-Rolt-In-Tandem
Specimen ConfiguratiLns ......... .............. 47
viii
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Figure Page
ix
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Figure Pag~e
58 Predicted Critical Plies for Net-Section
Failures .............. ...................... 68
x
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
xi
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
xii
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Figure Page
xiii
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
SECTIONI
INTRODUCT ION
SECTION II
2
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
S i. II I
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Ii
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
SECTION III
5
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
T - -- --
Problemr•InttmtUlZ)e Ol addHoeOnly
0 01
2S6+ 21 $66+
_4_ a4 F
PaxaY' U
~l6
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
I
wher,- Sjk are laminate compliance coefficients. The general
expresafion for the function F depends upon the roots of the
associated characteristic equation. Solving the characteristic
equation yiel(s a set of complex conjugate roots (RI, RA, R 2 ,
R 2 ). The stress function can be expressed as
F - 2Re {F 1 (Z) + F 2 (Z 2 ))
Ox= 2Re {R I O (Z ) + R2 O (Z 2 )1
C, = 2Re {1 j (z 1 ) + 4 ý (Z 2 )1
U = 2Re {P •I (zI) + P2 cb 2 (Z 2 ))
V 2Re {Q I I (z 1 ) + Q2 •2 (Z 2 )}
where
P2 S 11 R22 + S 12 -S 16 R 2
2k.1 • .. Ii l I I Ill l l
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
S22 + S 1 2 RP . S2 6
Q22
2 + S12 R2 - S2 6
2
2 _72 a2
k 1,2
k a(l - iUV) k = 1,2
The sign of the square root is chosen such that the exterior of a
hole is mapped to the exterior of a unit circle.
cc -M
(Z) B Z + A In 1+ A
M=I
+2 in2 + E A2 M 2-M
(Z 2 ) B2 Z A
M=I
8
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
2i
2
iPa (1-iR1 )
i(z)= x
1 4(R 1 -R 277
iPa2 (1-iR2 )
¢2 (z 2 ) " 4(R 1 - R2 )
y-
1< 2 2
900
400
--- 45k)
Ip
Figure 2. Unlaxiafly Loaded Infinite Plate j
9
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Only the linear terms and first coefficient of the eummation are
used for the unloaded hole solut.ion,
Y
PR _PCO$O
A A 1 + A2 - A 2 = Py/2 Yri
R A1 R A + R A2- R A = -P/2 7i
11 22 2 2 X
10
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
2 Y siC: Px
2 - + - 2- S12
1 R1 R2 A2 R2 2 2w S2 2
S1 P + $26P
A /R A /R 1 + A
12 /R.2 _/ 2 2 SI2 2 xni S y
2 2
for M = 4,6,8...
A A =0
IM 2M
for M = 1,3,5...
14M1/ 2 2_
AI =-aPi(-l)(M-)/2 (2+i MR )/[-'m,2 (M -4) (R -RI)]
lM 2 2 1
11
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
CHARACTERISTIC
DIMENSION
0- OR
12
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
02- ksi
ý--
30
- +20 -' ,
-- +10
S_,o
Tsai-Hil-
Tsai-Wu -20 00
~ HoffmanI
S-Maximum re -40
13
V
- -.. f
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
P/2 ti0lt
w - w
PI I
P/2WP/W
P/2Wt P/2Wt
SI I I w
I
3. PREDICTT'N3 UISING BJSFM APPROACH - Predictions made using the 1
BJSkN -ce presented in this section to indicate the scope and
flexibility of the developed methodology as well as indicate data
ard information pertinent to analysis of bolted joints in compos-
ile structures. The predictions shown are not intended to cover
all iaminates or loading combinations.
- ------ Isotropic
Composite
Y
Y
1_41
15
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Isotropic material
Composite
Y
Y y
_x x
/ /
/
GP1S.011544
16
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
3.0
2.6 00-00-0 0 00
1:: xO 00° ply
2.2
-. °×• • .dia
1.8
5 di i
C.FiieWdhEfcs-T
1.0- vlaiefcso iiego
0 0,02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12
17
| ' , . . .. .. . . . . . ..
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
1.2 -
w/d =81
id-S9
- 0.4 --- ]
GBRG .~
1.4_
_.1 1 1~
, - BJSFM Prediction
1.2
0) Finite element (,/d = 9.0)
n- • d - 0.25
-x
E0/40/10 Layup
E 1.0 NNW.•
•Z P.8-- _ _
0.6 - 20
0 4 8 12 16
Width/Diameter - w/d
OP15-O1•I46-
41.8
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
'e/d = 3
1.2 - - w_
0.8
0.4.
- - -
BJF fnt wit
Finite element model
- -- ,
0BJSFM - finite width : "
50/40/10 Layup
-0.4 -• ,
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
t) Location About Hole - Deg ON 3411 &W
Figure 12. Correlation of Loaded Hole Analysis for Small Edge Distance Cases
19
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
70 100I
,Unotchd LaminateS ro
"c
007575
900 Failunt__ 4
60 -. - Initiation Angle 90
i ~ 0=.125--
,50 8
20
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
55 1-7 00
Nxy Ply Fails
N~ x -oo,,•
5Op
Fails
05015
S = 0.250
I
0
CONN,
45
-496'5011 LayuIJ
21
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
130 I
46/50/4 Lavup
0
120
- 110
ol '50 Ply
4-.o•
LA.
> o1
w.10,/ - ~~~~0.25 -. 0 / .1
Fails
C
0
1001
-9
00 Ply
V. ,Fails
22
iU
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
39 ( 03
S-0 N
41!
3.7 ý
UL J
xV
Ic ________46/50/4 Layup
0
00
v
LO 35
'21 z-
Ply
+45 Faiils
Nx
23
I,
!• ~ ~32o,0
280
50/40/10 LAYUP
STRESS 20 ,---__5°PLE
80 ---
OPI).1PLY)
0 20 40 60 80 120
STRSDEG OFF PRINCIPAL MATERIAL AXIS
24
P
DOFF
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
80
60 - -
c~40
20- _ __ _
0 20 40 60 80 100
Bearing Stress - ksi 0p1S-OI 1B-M
25
' ~ ~~~~_.Mi•,
r .0 'l "- .
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
SECTION IV
26
Z17
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
[ _ _ _ _
ClU
+ >'>I
m
>>
OocB-
>F>
fs , 0m
i
» ~~& ;
ot
N»
c
C2L L2hI!0
_j- __ "0I
Kl z caOO@~
L
-cow0
L-C~
CL
LU LU i lU0
CL C. CL CL CL I.
,- >-)CIL
B-B f - -B
ca c
LU LUZV B-j
Zf LUu
0j LU LUIE
ca cc -M
ot C3 0 ~-C )
U
,
LL cn n Ln L
27 0
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
o~11
LU
4.
- ci
z ~ in- »
m»a,>RRC
_:- C44"
44F , f 5
4.- 6
,, I [ <
* . - _ _ _ __a
.- SM IP
.5.L
I.1 c 00
-CC
SM IIJ SMSXM M
a-
0 N SU a 4~
z4-
aoU
Wn 0
____ _
m
_
W _____
_ _ _ @
_ __ _ _ _U _
cm.
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
A 70 20 10 40 V V V 24
B so 40 10 40 V V V V V 24
120 V V 18
C 30 60 10 40 / V V V V V 24
108
S50 10 40 40 V/ V V 12
E 40, 20 40 40 V VI V/V 12
F 40 50 10 40 V V V V 12
G 30 30 40 40 IV' IV/V 12
H 20 40 40 40 V V V V 12
1 20 70 10 40 V V 12
J 10 80 10 40 V V V V 12
84
A 70 20 10 40 X X X 6
B 50 40 10 40 x X X 6
120 X X X 6
30 60 10 40 X X X 6
30
Total No. Tests 222
V Noncountersunk Specimens
X Countersunk Specimens 0Pl13111"iI
29
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Phase Layup %Layers No. Hole Die eld wid Single Double Total
No. No. 0O +450 0o Plies 0 0.250 0.375 0.500 0.250- 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0 4 6 8 Sheer Shoat Specinons
1 170 20 10 20 0 V V/ V ••V V/ - 87
TI 2 50 10 40 20 0 V .-- -V- V- V - 9
I 3 50 40 10 20 0 VN/ V VV* V A 86
1[ 4 40 20 40 20 - V.-V-V- - V - 6
U 5 40 40 20 20 - V . . . .- V-- - V - 6
R 6 30 20 50 20 - V - - - - - V - 6
I 7 30 60 10 20 0 V V V VVVVVVV - 87
R 8 20 40 40 20 -- V - . . -V-V -- V-V - 6
1 9 20 60 2020- - - V
V/- V - -V -- 6
HI 1010 80 10 2P - V - . . .- V-- -V V - 6
11 11 55 40 5 20 0 V - - - V V V - V
- / - 15
11.000 in
d ' J.500T
900
0-/ _.1i in.
3.000
_ _d = 0.250
F 00 -/ 1.500 in.
1900 _j_
d = 0.1251
0- 00 --
O_____-
___ 0.75 in.
40 Plies 2000 T
0.375 in.
&---0Strain Gage
30
ip
- t9 -' - i4'
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
eI
90° -- \--
450
Strain Gage
31
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Strain GageSt
kClevis
P I e
Load
J --- P
Graphite/Epoxy
Specimen
0.025 Max Gap
-Graphite/Epo'y Specimen
OF13-OlI1-4t
32
iJ
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
P1 P2
0.5
S"-ý-10 (Baseline)
I- 0.4
0..0
0.3
0.2
0 4 8 12
Ex - Laminate Stiffness Specimen - (106 psi)
f
16
I 20
P14k116.M
33
__..p. •
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
a0 + Io00c0+
,, + I ISO0 Q ICC
zS
20
Cc + 1 00+ 10coo
2C.2
+0 la~oI +0 1080+0 IC +01080+0 lgo V
2- z
z ooooo~ i ~ ~ ~ a0
4L_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -j 06__
~0
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - to
uJr
~ -NI~w~a~-0>
9L ~ .E
34j
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
?or aninitMiXl
JSF i-rccedur
veriicaionof
he fo th cae o anunloaded
fastener hole. Using the IV.SFM procedure, strength predictions
were made for all test layups and teati conditions. Lamrinate elas-
tic properties were calculated using unidirectional ply lamina
elastic constants. Laminate failure was assumed to occur when
first ply fiber or shear failure w'as predicted, based on the Tsai-
Hill or maximum strain material failure criterion applied at a
characteristic dimension away from the hole. Only laminaj
strength and stiffness data were required for this analysis;
these data are shown in Figure 27. RTD data are average values
obtained fromi MCA1R tests performed on unnotched unidirectional
laminate sandwich beams, arid 0*/9Q@ rail-shear specimens; RTW
and ETW data are estimatod.
35
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
120 I~~~
Rc 0.02 in.
100 -- %0 0 Plies
080
b
S6040 90/
'U.I
3x 400
0D
I10
20 60 60 8 10
20
0!
36
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
180II ' -- I
fstu
4Uiross d
160 1 1"
140g
"__I I
-~120 -- Predicted
S 100
! ~30160/10 10)
20 "
14,000
12.000
0.250
.~10,000 -__ CSK
I Average
M
U ' Hole Size
(n 8.000
4,000
2,000-
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Hole Diameter - in. Qp Ml.5Iw
37
i! . ...... ... ~ . ,.
~~j .....- ,.
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
72 , I
Rc -d 0.250
FtU-
p66
-- ./ Predicte
0~ I
S64 - -
U-
62 --
0.02 Value of R. Used
in All Tension Analysis
58|
0.015 0.017 0 .019 0.021 0 .0 2 3 0.025 0.027
Characteristic Dimension, Rc - in.
38
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
700/j
39
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
60-
50
. __Rc =
-48/48/4
0.02
,AYUP-
w/d = 6
Fu 40
FAILURE __REDICTED
STRESS 30
KSI 00 PLY REF
__ __ _
20 F()
10 d 0.250 F0
0 10 20 30 40 50 50 70 80 90 100
S- LU AD ORIENTATION - DEG
40
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
-66_
0.025 Value Used for I
All Compression Analysis
-642
, I¶
d = 0.250 Data I
-• Predicted
•x -60 4
LL
KY
2 -58
_= •e" 30/60/10 Layup
Chrateisi x-in
Dies, R
-54
IN
S~00 Ply Ref 1
-521 1i
0.019 0.021 0.023 0.025 0.027 0.029 0.031
Characteristic Dimension, Rc - in.
41
___ ___ I
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
I 2
-180 I
Cu u
-140 x Sso 6d
I
LL 120
-100
-80 __ 04/bA
18,000
n Prediction
16,000 .
c!14,000 -
70/20/10 Weighted
Fgr 12,000
e or Hole Size t
x for 0.250 Csk
42
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
120 %o o 'ie ,
90• •r = 0.025
"*80
050
0 60
U 40
U_
01
0 20 40 60 80 100
% +450 Plies
GPI"11t -101
4
43
~- 4~-
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
II
Sw
SxCU d =0.25xCU
180
i 80 50/4b/10
Rc = 0.025 in.
T
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Temperature - OF
44
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
15.00 -
1.000---- - - 0.750
;" , I,,,
I, ,, p o 1.500
I I /
d0G 2 +0.0022 _/ SS
0 Strain Gage -0.0000 20 Plies
Notes: T
Laminate: 50/40/10 Layup
Stacking Sequence: [+450, 00, -450, 00, 900, 00, +450, 00, -450, 00]s
Thickness (t): 0.208 in. Nominal (20 Plies)
Fastener Type: ST3M 453-4 (0.2495 + 0.0000/-0.0005 in. dia)
Torque Value: 50 in.-Ib (1/4 in. Fastener)
Load Configuration: Double-Shear
OPI"-116-47
45
,,I
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
wi
15.00
-3.50-
S--I --- i
Design w e d
VaribleVariations
Variable w
(in.) (in.) (in.) __________
Plies in.
Load Oreintation All 1.50 0.750 0.250 20 0.208
4.6
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
- 15.00
-,---- 3.50 S-" e
-4
00 Strain Cut Off and / -- d
Re-Drill for t
Gage
Next Test r i
47
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
15.00
0.750/T
V ~0.7501
0.208
[I_ ;; -Vl
Design d W S
Variaale (in.) Variation (i.) (in.) (in.)
P0 P
48
,=8 p.
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
n o 1.000 2.500
-- 7.50
GPIS.•IO11-6
49
- -k - .,-._ • .
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
50
L I
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
I I Double-shear
"Gr3~oss 4d 3d Ultimate failure
160
120
.0 xPred.cted
40 ___ ____________
_______
6,000 30/60/10
'000
Ci
* 2,000
702/0 20 4Predicted
60 80to
51
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
-II
d -,0.250 -
PTotal I P2 6d
XGross 4d 3d
• •, f •ETW
130-
U-
90
/
50"
7
a - ,000, r I
C -J
__-__--5,000 Predicted
S-5,000 -
.0.0,
IIl
--1,000,
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent of ±450 Plies CIP13-0115,44
52
j
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
d = 0.250-\ Double-shear
0 Vo•\N
- _T 50 in,-Ib torque-up
P 6d 0Oin.-lb torque'up
0 [0 Initial nonlinearity
50/40/10 layup
3d
160,
40
80
0 20 40 60 80 100
ditioned~~
spcmesat20e.Thoe reiced ictlped:cin
Off-Axis Loading Angle, 0i - deg
tbt T
a P13-0115i-
53
pI
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
200 __
A* UUltimate
0 0 Initial nonlinearity -6d
160---
50 in.-lb rorque Up
Double-Shear 3
RTD3
120
-0XT W
80
40 ____
6,000
5,000
T D
4,000
Predicted RTD
2,01050
54
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
P p1 •
6d_
bl, Initial cu
Test Condition x Nonlinearity _ _ X
50/40/10
Layup ksi Prcent A ksi Percent A
Z an./in. Percent A
of IRTD of RTD of RTD
Edge Distance
(c) - Effects of edge distance on
joint: strength were evaluated by testing two-fastener-in-tandem
double shear specimens. Tests were performed on dry specimens at
room temperature and on moisture conditioned specimens at 250°F.
3pecimen.-, were loaded to failure in tension. Additional RTD data
on the effects of edge distance on pure bearing (single-fastener)
streorgth were available from an earlier WCAIR in-house program.
55A
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
d 0.250\
P 1 + P2 -d I
50 in.-Ib Torque-Up x 4d e
160
i RTD
120 .TV
C,,
80
40
5,000
RTD
4,000
S'• __ ETW -
3,000
2,000
1,000
0 1 2 3 4 5
Edge Distance/Diameter , e/d
OP134-11E-40
56
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
57
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
k-s--s--i d-=0.25
50 in.-Ib To'que-Up
Double-Shear
180
SS= 0.50
.' 100
. . . . - Prediction
t601
* A n Ultimate
N
O A 03 Initial nonlinearity
50/40/10 layup
t 3,000 ___"-
2,000
2 3 4 5
58
LmLmmmmm
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
d 0.375-
(I50/40/10 layup
- I .
Baseline stacking sequence (no. 1)
Ct A@ Stacking sequence no. 6
A
X 3d
160
4L
120
nx
LL
Ci)
.E 80
40'•
3,000
C • Double-Shear
"• 2,000
nx Single
1,000
1 2 3 4 5
Edge Distance/Diameter - e/d OPI"115-37
59
'St
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
S--I_
d 0.250-
~Tota --e - 6d
Double-Shear
50 in.-lb Torque-Up 4d 3d
S~160 -
_Bearing/Shearou:
120 Failure Mode
120
U o
•J * Ultimate strcngth
o Initial n~onlinearity
40 10
(nto
tm 1100
60
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Pi +P e I d- ,5
--we- 6d
50 in.-lb Torque-Up 4d 3d
160 ,---RTD Bearing
F I ro N et RT Nt . l " " Failure
Shearout
[
Section Failure
v4'N 120
.0 x
--*• -.. 1
S.......... .
-- - ETW
4C
6,000
5,000 . .. .. •
'. 4,000 --
_____D
3,000
0
SETW
2,000
1
0 A Ul'imate
A Initial nonlinearity ETW
__II__I_
IOOC,
0 2 4 6 8 10
Width/Diameter, w/d
OPt3-115-35
61
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
rI
iI
/
Ia) Net-Section
at RTD
(b)
Bearing-Shearout
Fig(5re at
2. Joint ETW
Failures
Changed
at ETW
Test Conditions
I.
62{
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
I2
P1 + P2 -'- we 6d Double-hear
P2 P1 j Ultimate failure
120
C4
4--
40
6,000
O. 125 1 9.375 05 6 5
80, -df
4,000
-x
2,000
63
i I
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
II
CIPI13-15.33
64
, •
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
1
Pbypass Pbolt bypass
6o' -.- o- -- )6
60 0 y
45 plies @ OCr T:40 '
S40
0
00 plies @ Ocr 85-9
20
SUltimate strength data
0 Initial nonlinearity
I0I
- Single hole test specimen
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Bearing Stress - ksi GP13-Ol15-114
65
1..
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
80
4U
00 plies @ cr
U e ale
Figu strengthf e 7
0 Isnitial non-linearitya
I . a
0 20 40 60 80 10O0 120
Bearing Stress - ksi OpIW.0IS-113 i
66
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
32 __
50/40/10 LAMINATE
I INT
28 PTOTALP__ 7 PRBYPASS
24 -- 7 1,__ ___
UNLOADED HOLE
20 -- -____ - -
PTOTAL K---
1000 LB LOADED HOLE
+ BYPASS LOAD
12 -
I•NDICATOR OF FIRST
PLY FAILURE
_2% OFFSET
0 e "- 'ozo 0.0
0
0 C,02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
67
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
3-
/ 2R
1 , I _.•I,,/
,- - /
//
FBY-PASS FBy.PASS
,P13-01 I S103
68
IIle
2R
/10
/,/
SHEAROUT B
BEARING FAILURE (HIGH BEARING)
PBOLT
-FBY-PASS
FBY-PASS
OP13-0115-112
69
I.
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
F , -
OP13-116-111
70
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
fbr
+ 100
~ ~ ~ 1 1 by pass
"j d ""
fbypasI fbr f0
- fbr
fbr 0
br (deg) X y
f &< 450 (ksi) (ksi)
10.0 25 4.3
IN.'I, __fbypass22.5 25 10.4
1-y 45.0 25 25.0
71 j
L*-
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
r!
P]
P Double-shear
-Ft Ultimate failure
- Initial nonlinearity
70
*~60
"U. 50
Prediction J
40 _ - --- - --
E 6000
Zw 5000
"• 4000
Prediction
300
0 5 1015 20 25 30
Fbr - ksi Y 1
OP13&0115.32
72
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Graphite/Epoxy Specimen
-Graphite/Epoxy Spesimen
73
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
PP P2-G P
RTD ETW
74
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
OP13-0115-85
76
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
77
L "
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
2 20 It
Double-Shear Ex d -00250
.2
LL
4,000
Ci
c - ' • "='.50/40/10
60
0 20 40 60 80 100
Figure 67. Effects of Layup and Torque-Up on RTD Pure Bearing Strength
78
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
-i 0.250 -
• --,-- 1.5
30/60/10 Layup
GP13-011547
79
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
14,000
13,000
Unnotched
Unidirectional
11,000 Tensile Strain
Capability
10,000
9,000
Ct
X /-d 0.250
*- 8,000
x 6d I
6Unloaded Hole-
F 6,000
5,000 .---
4,000 Torque-Up
0in.-Ib--•.II
Loaded Hole 5 n.b- ___,,__
3,000
6d
Double-Shear
(All layups contain 10 percent 900 plies) j
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percent of ±450 Plies
GP13-0115677
80
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Double-shear
U Ultimate failure
3d
Q3 Initial nonlinearity
200 --
120
-Prpcixtion
80 _
40 -- _
20 40 60 80 100
Torque-Up - in..lb GP13-o115.27
81
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
200 F l T
Diuble-shear
( 0.250 Ult mate failure
_T Initial nonlinleirity
P - 6d Predicton
P
160
3d
120
-x
U_
- Prediction
40__ _ _jz
00 20' 40 60 80 1 GO
Toi1ue-Up - in.-l
OP13-VI15.26
82
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
(I 0.250p\
P 6d
Double-shear
Ultimate failure
r3 Initial nonlinearity
3d
200
160
120
.L -BJSFM
80 ,. •,..Prediction
-1
40
0 -
0 20 4J 60 80 100
P,3
-I
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
d= 0.250- d -0 .250
PT
PT 6dP _G 6d
, •0.25_..
0 Double-Shear _ d_,
Sex 3 ext 4d 3d
180
2 24 asteners-
12
Sin-a-Row Joint
i 6,000
-4--
C-
2x
2,000r-= J-
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Torque-Up - in.-lb
041340116-2
84
L ,t
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
d- 0.375-
pp 6d
Double-Shear 3d
200
* U Ultimate failure
Initial nonlinear~ty
S150-
M -
TNon-CNk-
CE 50
1c8 ,,
40,
!~
1 v0
00
C.
2,400
2,200-
Qk-- IT"
i
2,000 f,
Thcnesin.t 0P3152
1,4oo01
0 .01 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.?
Thickness - in.
85
- .
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
86
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
200
b~u 3&~1 6d
d 0.250 -
150
z x
uL
1T.
CE
50
•RTD • nUltimate
2,600
T
2.200
.C
C I
U.
. 1,400
1,000
600
1 6 7
"acking Sequence Number
50/40/10 Layup
87
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
200 1
.. m4Ultimatq strength -*-025;-\
- ()initial non-linearityT
16 ___6d -
1050 in..bTorqu.e I.
Double-Shear 3d
4 120 -
LL
411111111
80
13JSF M
Prediction
.40
2,000 -- -__
0 04 60 f 80 10
I,,
88
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
d =0.250
-- 6d 50 in.-lb Torque-Up
(.• .. N Double-Shear
7- Ultimate failure
33d 0 Initial nonlinearity
120
100
80
LL 60 ,i.. i.---.-•,,-- -,
201
2,000
1,500 1 - ill
; 1,003
Figure 77. Correlallion of Joint ETW Tensile Streng!h with Grouped 00 Plies
39
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
iI
(1 0.250
Double-Shaar
150 --- - - -- _ _ _ _ _ -. _ _ _ _ _ _
140 - -
130 - - - -
___ _ _ -_U ___
120 • •• •--
2 1Prediction
.U -x go o Ply
_ Fiber Failure -- ____ __
Prediction
10 450 Plies - - --- ___
801 1__ _ _ _ _ _1
3,000 f--------
2,600
W
x 1,000 -Stacking - t _
Sequence
Nu0e 1 1
0 20 40 60 80 100
Maximum "'Nicent of Grouped 00 Flies
Figure 78. Correlation of Joint RTD Compressive Strength with Grouped 00 Plies
90
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Clevis
Double- Shear
Ultimate
f@0 Csk Single-Shear
Ultimate
fA Csk
140
120
' I
C" 100 - _ __ _
8012
601 __ _ _ _ _ _ _
40
0.125 0.250 0.375 0.500
Diameter - in.gplal111
91
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
18
o.
Ultimate failure
I
'.--49-
RTC)
-
1Y50/40/1o
0
ETW
-
Single-shear
Noncoutitersink
LA .UP
140
S100 - _ _
.-A-
60
20-
3,000 -
d0., 0.25
2,500 P
I!
P
2,50 Clevis
2,000
t--
'U.X
1,500 - _ __
1,000
92
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Number of Tests
Per Environment Total
Anomaly rSpecimen
RT (Dry) IRT (Wet) ET (Wet) Tests
olesTensio -n Compressior Compression
1. Ou-of-ound
6. Interference LayUP 1 4 -4 8
Fit Tolerances 1 4 4 8
0.003 in. Interference 2 4 -- 4 8
0.008 in. Interference 2 4 -4 8
7. Fastener Removal and Reir-stallation
100 Cycles 4 4
Totdl 116
A GOP13-115-110
zi\A fter f reeze' xhirs c,- Rit /2\Tenvsion tests
93
ICi
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
94
€I
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
1.2
1.0 -__
0.8
C
CU 0.4
0.2
98% RH
R +8 95% 9H I _I 55% RH
16 0 °F I 160 0 c '" I 8 •I 18 0 °F
2.4
95% RH
_-
RH
,,
(a) For Baaeline Specimens
98% RH55%
__
__
RH
. 1.6 ]- --
. 1.2 ---
w08
A
0.4 derv" delamination
04 n vere porosity
C severe delaminition
0
0 25 so 75 100 125 150
Days
(b) For DelanrAnated or Porous Specimens oPsI11-O1i6t
95
• - • • .-. . .• ,
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
RrD COMPRESSION
TENSION RT 25&F
OUT-O, ROUND HOLES
* 50/40/10 LAMINATE 0 - -
* 30/60/1(0 LAMINATE -4.8 - -
BROKEN FIBERS EXIT SIDE OF HOLE
e SEVERE -9.5 -3.t -12.2
* MODERATE -4.9 -4.2 _
96
L!
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
LT
O..
100-
two- 0.750--, I__
d =0.250
"I(
PTctal
P2 P1 6
- XGross
Task 2 Task 3 %
Test Condition Baseline
"u cData Anom-.aly Results Change
bU•. odn
Out-of -Round Holes Fbd C.u Loading
XGross x2 XGros Fbru eGross
_ (k•i (liin./in.) (ksi) (in./in.)
50/40/10 Layup • RTO 140 3,990 146 4,010 +4.3 +0.6 Ten
30/60/10 Layup - RTD 143 5,470 141 5,200 -1.3 -4.8 Ten
OPI4.01S-14
97
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
T:++
T::::+.+
Il I!++
is ' '•t W::
i! +l ! i ;i
Itti:iitt(,, ,
98
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
d 0.250-
Task 2 Task 3 %
Test Condition Baseline Data Anomaly Results Chanue
Hole Delaminations bru - u FbrU u Loading
(50/40/10 Layup) x2 XGross 2 Gross Fbru CGross
(ksi) (pin./in.) (ksi) (pin./in.)
Moderate:
RTD +140 +3,990 +138 +3,790 -2.0 -4.9 Ten
RTW -155 -4,740 -150 -4,450 -3.2 -6.2 Comp
ETW -120 -3,790 -115 -3,810 -3.7 +0.6 Comp
Severe:
RTD +140 +3,990 +130 +3,610 -7.3 -9.5 Ten
RTW -155 -4,740 -142
ETW -120 -3,790 -109 [ -4,580
-3,330
-8.4
-8.7
-3.5
-12.2
Comp
Comp
0PlS.411-la
IL
.. . . ...... -
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
I
Moisture Induced & None Every 7th Ply Every Ply
OP1341101
L -lne mist sprayed betwmn plies
100
5p
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Spec No 3 22 4
4.1
100 C-Scan
0 Region
101
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
160
140k
120 - C-ool Down from 180OF - 55% R• exposure
100
80---
- Room Temperature
LA.
o 40-/
S20 /
S0 --
S-20 1
_--40 --
-60 - _- -65 F
-80 _
-1I00 -- --- 30- 30 30 -
5--
-120 -1 Cyce
-140
Time in Minutes
102
I.
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
d 0.250-\
P~otalP 2 P1
lXross
Task 2 Task 3 %
Baseline Data Anomaly Results Change
Test Cnditio
Porosity bru u FbrU uoading
(50/40/10 Layup) Fx2 XGron x2 XGross Fbru I Gross
(kSi) (Win./in.) (ksi) (.in.!n.)
Moderate Porosity:
RTD +140 +3,990 ..-.. Ten
RTW -155 -4,740 -184 -4,480 -4.3 -54 Comp
RTW (F-T) --15 --4,740 -142 -4,370 --8.4 -7.9 Comp
ETW -120 -3,790 -104 -3,110 -12.8 -17.9 Comp
Severe Porosity:
RTD +140 43,990 +140 +3,940 0 -1.2 Ten
RTW -155 -4,740 --139 --4,170 -10.3 --12.1 Comp
RTW (F-T) -155 -4,740 -137 -4.110 -11.9 -13.3 Comp
ETW -120 -3,790 -83 -2,550 -30.3 -32.6 Comp
Note: (F-T) - ttxposed to freoze-thaw cyclas Opt3411tS4
103
J-
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
r\ !
d -0.25(j-
~Tot al'
XGross
Task 2 T-ak 3 %
Test Condition Baseline Data Anomaly Results Change
Fastener Seating FbrU u bru u Loading
(50/40/10 L.yup) Fx2 CXGross Fx CGross Fbru cGross
(ksi) ( pin./in.) (ksi) (C b rin./ino)
80% Depth - RTD 140 3,990 117 3,240 -20 -23 Ten
100% (Knifedge) - RTO 140 3,990 92 2,540 -53 -57 Ten
0P150115-?
104
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
4.F
S - 0.20 Diame*,---te
Point of
+100 (Toward)
Interference-\ -100 (Away From)
0.108
-Lminate2 I Bearin_ _
S~~~~S u rf ac e ____'-
105
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __
__ _ _ _ _ _
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
d 0.250--T
_ _ _ _ _
XGtoss
LT,-k 2 Task 3 %
Test Condition Baseline Data Anomaly Reults Chanwe
Tilted Countersink Fbru M Fbru u Loading
(50/40/10 Layup) x2 XGross x2 XGross Fbru 'Gross
(ksi) (pJin./in.) (ksi) (/pin,/in.)
Toward Bearing
RTD +-140 +3990 +110 •3,030 -18 -24 Ten
ETW -120 -3,750 100 -2,898 -14 -23 Comp
106
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
d 0.250-\
PTetaI
!6d
P2 P16
( ;OSS K ±
Task 2 Task 3 %
Test Condition Baseline Data Anomaly Results Change
Tost Conditio
Interference Fit Fbru (U Fbru Cu G Loading
X2 XGross x2 XGross FbrU egress
(ksi) (pin./in.) (ksi) (pin./in.)
50/40/10 Layup:
0.003 Interference
RTD 140 3,990 140 4,000 +2.1 +0.4 Ten
ETW 110 3,080 120 3,530 +11.8 +14.7 Ten
0.008 Interference
RTD 140 3,990 140 4,030 +1.0 +0.9 Ten
ETW 110 3,080 120 3,420 ý8.1 +11.2 Ten
30/60/10 Layup:
107
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
fntoiference Fits:
0.0010 in, 0.0034 in. .05n
IVI
Exit Side
108
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
Task 2 Task 3 %
Test Condition Baseline Dotta Anomaly Results Change
Fastener Reinstallation Fbru u FbrU u Loading
(50/40/10 Layup) XGross X2 XGross Fbru eGross
(ksi) (jin./in.) (ksi) (pin./in.)
100 Cycles
RTD -r140 +3,990 +140 +3,900 -1.3 -2.2 Ten
ETW -120 -3,790 -11,, -3,510 -9.3 -7.4 Comp
109
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
110
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
•3 333 3 333 3 3 33
____1 3 - ?• - 33 3 .
19/76/5 _1 0,t_ 3 3 - 3 - -
023 - 3 - -
(03 3 - 3 - -
3. ....
2 STACKING SEOUENCE 01 3- - -
50/40/11C 02 3 3 - 3 - -
03 3 3 - 3 -
1&3 .. .
19:;5
; 3 3 -- 3 - -
02 3 3 - 3 - -
03 3 3 3 - -
3 TOROUE UP
T = 160 IN.-LB 01 3- - -
50/40/10/ 3 - 3 -
03 3 3 - 3 - -
_ .....
T = 160 IN.-LB 01 - - -
19/76/5 02 3- -
03 3 3 - 3 - -
L_ 3
111
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
4 I GEOMETRY
50/40/10 Z•al 3...
0 . ..
d -0.375 2 3-..
w/d -4 03 3 ... .
e/d -3 & 3
3..
19/76/5 a\1 -3 .. . ..
d - 0.375 02 3 .. . . .
w/d -4 03 3 .. . . .
e/d -3 & 3 .. . . ..
19/76/5 01 3 .. . . .
d - 0.375 02 3-.. . . .
wM -3 03 3 .. . .. .
e/d - 3 .. . ..
50/40/10 /•Ž 0 3 -.. . .
d - 0.375 02 3 .
w/d - 4 03 3 -.. . .
e/d =4 3 -.. . .
02 3 3 . . ..
03 3 3 . . ..
112
L p...,
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
7.50
1.125-
1 00 STRAIN GAGE/
+__ 2,25
0.3745 +0.0022
-0.0000 1
] 1~
LJ..~CLEVIS(
SPEC IMEN-
LOADING CONFIGURATION
GP134115-107
113
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
MEASURED MIX
EXCEEDANCES OF
H
60% LIMIT STRESS
10,000- -\ _-
1,000 -
EXCEEDANCE
,,, ~ 1OOR
~1,000
HR 100 - /
10
114
4$
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
1 + + + + +
2 0 0 - - 0
3 - - 0 0 -
4 0 0 0 + 0
5 90 + 90 - +
6 0 90 0 0 -
7 + -+ + +
8 0 0 - - -
9 - + 0 -- +
10 0 -0-- I
CL CENTERLINE 90 90
NO. OF PLIES 20 20 20 21 21
PERCENT OF (BASELINE) (BASELINE) 50/40/10 19/76/5 (BASELINE)
00°/450 /90 0 50/40/10 30/60/10 1 1 19/76/5
Notes:
1) "+" and "-" reffers to ±450 phes.
115
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
d =0.375
00 ef6d
ly 0 in. Ab Torque-Up
1 P~ouble-Shear
tu
_ _ _ 3d _
joints.16
11----- -W
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
100,
4 "•"•R = +0.1
c60-
R =-1.0
3 7 5
4 P- P-
0 in -Ib Torque-Up -
Doublfe-Shear 3d
011 1 1 1 1 1 !1 -I 1II !1 1 I I I! I 1 I
1 101 102 103 105 106 107
N - Cycle-
117
L ,1
. , ,-". . . . ._I..
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
100
80
60
G1~O __ I
S 40 d - 0,375-"
C--,
20 0 in.-lb Torque-Up
Double-Shear 3d
0 WL llL 1 I L1 I I_ I I I I I I 1 1
1 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
N - Cycles
.+0.
20
""V- -
0 in.-lb Torque-Up
2
Double-Shear 3d
0 dJW
1 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
N - Cycles OP1S-0115ee
118
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
100
1 /76/5 Laoup
w
S60
~40
20 0 in.-lb Torque-Up I. -
Double-Shear 3d
01 11 1 I !1 I II 1 1 , I I II
1 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
N - Cycles
100
80
-- 0 30/60/10 Layup
U..60
20 0 in.-lb Torque-Up 3
3d
Double-Shear
0
1 101 102 103 104 105 106
N - Cycles
80
CL
l20 Ai020in.
1 101 102 10 10 15 06 io ,
N -Cycles OP13-011541
"120
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
60
CHole Elcongation 0.005-
*m 40
>P P 6d
20
0 in.-Ib Torque-Up [.
Double-Shear 3d
0 101 1 1o111
N - Cycles GP"14
100
60
Hole Elongation =0.005
(1 0.375
0 rin-lb Torque-Up1-
Double-Shear 3(d
111 i2 3 4o o6 7
N - Cycles PS014
121
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
7J 12
----1- -0
-I-
19/176/5 Layup
0P13.01 15-U
1 22
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
50/40/10 <16,000 -
ETW 16,000 - 0.0006 - 0.0012 0.000 0.0008 4,210
Residual Strength* - 8,660 7,540 8,540
50/40/10 <16,000 - (F)$ (F)
RTW (TS) 16,000 - 0.003 - 0.004 0.03 - 0.059 0.053 7,020
Residual Strength - 9,140 8,150 8,650
OPIS-011544
(F) Specimen failure occurred in some joints tested
* Rusidual strength tests at RT
-- No test
123
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
0.05
0.04
UJ 0.02 6d
0.03
N - Cycles oles.
I/
124
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
500
400 -
- 3
Cycle Peak
Bearing Stress (ksi) = 82.1 ksi 70.6 k•, 64.2 ksi
d 0.375__ _ _ __ _ __ _ _
(n PP6
1L - Double-Shear
0 in.-lb Torque-Up 3d
I I 1 I IiII I I I I I I I l i I
101 102 10 10 10 10 10
N - Cycles
125 i
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
10
fpm
_mJim
N - Cycles 0P13-O16-76
126
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
120
80
60 p
20-
0 in.-lb Torque-Up i-,
Double-Shear 3d
0 - 1i1 1 I IH I I IH I i I IH J I I IH i I i i
104 105 106 107
1 101 102 103
oP13.o11s47
N - Cycles
on Joint Life
Figure 117. Effect of Stacking Sequence
19/76/5 Layup
127
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
100
80
(n 60 04/
40 \19/76/5 Baseline
________6d______
20 0 in.-lb Torque-Up
Double-Shear
0
1101 10 10 10 10~ 101
N -Cycles PS012
Figure 118. Stacking Sequence -Comparison with R = 1.0 Baseline Life Trends
100
80
60
M 40
20 0 in.-lb Torque-Up
Dc'ible-Shear 3
Figure 119. Stacking Sequence - Comparison with R ++0.1 Baseline Life Trends
128
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
100
80
40 d .375--' 3d "-
6d
20
0 in.-lb Torque-Up
Double-Sh'.ar
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 lii 1 II I I IL L L1 1 I I 11 I I I
1 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
N - Cycles
0P13-011545
129
p. j
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
LI
100
80 _ _ _ __
CO
P; P 6o
40ý
20
0 in. -IbTorque-Up
Double-Shear
0
103 104 105 106 107
1 101 102
N - Cycles
130
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
I
Joint
S-N data for both layups and at both R-ratios are presented
in Figures 123 and 124 along with curves obtained from testing of
baseline specimens with no fastener torque-up Significant
increases in static and fatigue strength are trvident. While
failure modes were the same for both torque-up levels, areas of
damage surrounding the fastener hole appear more pronounced for
specimens torqued to 160 inch pounds (Figure 125) and overall
fatigue failures occurred more abruptly (faster rates of hole
elongation). This is in contrast to the gradual hole elongation
observed in specimens having no fastener torque-up, which permit-
ted specimens to survive additional fatigue cycling while damage
progressed slowly.
131
L _!
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
140
z / _ in To--.
-b -1.o
""16
Il
400
1 101 102
N - Cycles
132
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
20
ML
020
160 e0 - in.-Sb Torque-Up
__ -[__ - -- - _ __ -
0 pi ' R=+0.1
CL
80d 0.375
133
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
134• _
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
100
e/d = 4
80 ___
'•N~eld= 3-ý• a
U-) 60 -
,-Y
, 40 p- - 4d '"
0 0 in.-lb Torque-Up
20 Double-Shear
S1' 2 04 10 in6 10
N - Cycles
kIOPIS-O115-12
135
I
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
F..
100
T____
d4
80
(n 60
0 in.-lb Tocique-Up / 3
G Double-Shear
LI g
40 0.375~d~ .3d
10 12 13 14 1 06 17
Np- Cycles
136
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
w/d =6 w/d 4
dl w
w/d -3
GP13-O1IIgo
Figure 128. Changes In Failure Due to Geometry
137
A'
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
138
p4
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
120-
A!
40 Doube-Shear --
0.
SG 3d 1301 s7
Figure 129. Effect of 0.005 In. Interference Fit on Joint Fatigue Life
50440/10 Lay0 p
C--3
__ " m •0
3d.39
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
140
1 T peFSingle-Shear
600 180 R=+1.1 '
-u 60 d =0.375
214
140
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
I I
I I
4 -J
(c) Double-Shear
GP13.0115-91
Figure 131. Failures of SingleShear Specimens
141
__- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ -
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
120
2:00
with Porosity -
240 __'_-'
0 in.-lb Torque-Up
Double-Shear 3d
0 .JI lI I I II I ! II I I 1.L..J.1.....
L LLI I l 1 1 1 I
N - Cycles GPIS.O11B.4
142
I. 60
Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
SECTION V
RECOMMENDATIONS
143
S -
r! Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com
SECTION VI
REFERENCES
144
11U.S.Government Printing Office: 1981 757h-002/591