Submission Deadline Marks and Feedback

Before 6pm on: 15 working days after deadline (All Levels)

Click or tap to enter a date.

Click or tap to enter a date.

Module title & code Enterprise Information Management (CG03-3)

Assignment number and title
Assessment type
Weighting of assessment
Module learning outcomes
Assessment 2 (A) & 2(B)
Individual report 30% + Artefact 40%
70%
 Determine various approaches to business process management analysis and analyse the
issues relevant to integrating business information systems.
 Evaluate the major objectives, success factors and significant elements of Enterprise
Information Systems and formulate solutions using an ERP system such as SAP.

What am I required to do in this assignment?

Enterprise Information Management (EIM) provides consistent and reliable architectures, guidelines, standards, tools, and
services for the analysis, design, management, delivery, and integration of institutional data.
The purpose of assessment report is fundamentally focused towards evaluating the major objectives, success factors and
significant elements of Enterprise Information Systems. This assessment (2A & 2B) carries 70% weighting overall.
1.1 Student Individual Report: Assessment 2(A) (30%) Guidelines
You should select any two Enterprise Information Management (EIM) systems and critically evaluate their major objectives,
architectures, services and success factors for a chosen area of business preferably oil and gas industry.
Some of the examples of EIM’s include but not limited to
 OpenText
 OnBase
 AgrriWebb
 Comidor
 Constellio
If you choose any other topic then you need to take approval from the module lecturer.
The report should include the following sections
Introduction
Major objectives, architectures, services and success factors with respect to the chosen EIM software
Critical evaluation
Conclusion

1.2 Student Individual Artefact: Assessment 2(B) (40%) Guidelines

The student should select any one of the following business functions of SAP S/4 HANA and would require students to perform
complete set of tasks related to the business functions.
 Buy (Material Management – MM)
 Sell (Sales and Distribution – SD)
 Make (Production Planning – PP)
 Track (Financial Accounting and Controlling – FI and CO)
 People (Human Capital Management – HCM)
 Store (Warehouse Management – WM)
 Project (Project System – PS)
 Maintain (Enterprise Asset Management – EAM)
 Services (Customer Support – CS)

The student should record the work done as screen shots with explanation. The screenshots can be copied to a word document
to create one pdf file. You should clearly mention the work is yours by providing clear link to your login. You can include
relevant reports of your tasks.

Deliverables
Individual Report Submission on MOVE via Turnitin by week 15/16
Artefact Submission by week 15/16.
Is there a word limit (Number of Words ± 10%)?
2500 words
10% (+/-) 11-20% (+/-) 21-30 (+/-) 31-40% (+/-) 41-50% (+/-) + 50%
no penalty Reduction of 5 Reduction of reduction of 15 Reduction of 20 Fail the assessment 
Marks 10 Marks Marks Marks
What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations)
 Produce a report with evaluation of at least one EIM system
 Explain the use of EIM in relation to organizational requirements for the benefit of the organization.
 Provide an artifact with some completeness of working, having few details and accuracy

How do I produce high quality work that merits a higher grade?

Key objectives to address in this section may include (but not limited to):

2
 o Produce a report with evaluation of more than one EIM system
o Appraise the software/ technology requirements, its components, and its features.
o Produce a report with evaluation of at least one EIM system.
o Identify the infrastructure required for the technology to be used with its benefits, ensuring business productivity.
o Differentiate this technology from similar and/or competing technologies in the similar business domain.
o The report should include a substantial amount of academic literature (e.g., academic journals, chapters in edited
research books either in business or other areas (e.g., education, computer science)).
o Research reports from respected firms such as Gartner Group, McKinsey, Nielsen Media and Accenture are also
valuable resources. Resources from the professional business literature (e.g., white papers, trade magazines, reputable
articles on the Web) are acceptable, but should be used rarely and only in context.
o Explain the use of EIM in relation to organizational requirements for the benefit of the organization.
o Provide an artifact with completeness of working, having excellent details and accuracy

How does assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions?

The scheduled sessions as cover the importance of enterprise Information systems, Business Strategy driven IT management,
use of information systems to achieve competitive advantage and IT as a Strategic driver for decision making. The assignment
criteria require the student to an enquiry/analysis of challenges in Information System regarding the appropriate practices
available for building enterprise information systems for the selected area of business. Further practical sessions on SAP S/4
would help the student in navigation and understanding of business functions.

3
How will my assignment be marked?
Your assignment be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page.
You can use them to evaluate your own work and estimate your grade before you submit.
Sub Standard / No
N Weighin Poor Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Outstanding
Criterion Attempt
o g (%) (20 Marks) (40 Marks) (50 Marks) (60 Marks) (70 Marks) (100 Marks)
(0 Marks)
Rubrics
1 Information 20 There is no evidence for Sources not Information search is Relevant Very good Excellent Outstanding
and information search/ used to support evident. There is an information usage of variety application of use of a wide
Research Tasks are incomplete. substantive attempt to address search is evident, information the relevant range of
assertions or some tasks. All the but not adequate. from various information appropriate
Completion argument. tasks lack proper sources. from variety and current
of Tasks, focus in discussion. Contents are of sources. sources,
Detailed Information There is a good properly Excellent focusing on
information search is not Although the attempt to paraphrased. usage and research
search (20 adequate. Very information supports address the tasks. The usage of quoting of the based reviews
%) limited the task, some of information can literature at indicating
resources are them are not be better if it relevant personal
used to discuss properly analysed All the tasks are relates to the discussions. research and
the tasks. and lack paraphrasing discussed but one context. All the tasks critical
at some areas. or two tasks lack are discussed awareness of
Limited and focus or clarity. All tasks are astutely with their status
uncritical use of discussed proper focus. and
a restricted properly. relevance.
range of Use of a wide
sources range of
appropriate
sources,
indicating
critical
awareness of
their status
and
relevance.
2 Understandin 20 No evidence of Limited General Good Evidence of Evidence of Evidence of
 g of Issues (20 understanding the evidence of understanding of the understanding of very good excellent exemplary
%) Reference issues. understanding various issues. Some the various issues. understanding understandin understandin
to appropriate the issues. reference to related Majority of the of relevant g of relevant g of relevant
theoretical theoretical tasks show theory and theory and theory and
background,
background is evidence of good research in all research. research.
illustrations.
evident. understanding of tasks. Reference to Reference to
related appropriate appropriate
appropriate theoretical theoretical
theoretical background background
background. provides provides
support to support to
the the
discussion. discussion.
Some
illustrations Illustrations
that support are provided
the that amplify
theoretical the
background theoretical
are evidenced background.
in the
discussions.
3 Application 35 Lack of analysis of The discussed Use of a range of There is good Use of a wide Excellent Critical
and Analysis information. No tasks are appropriate sources. evidence for range of analysis of the reasoning is
discussion is evident. completely out But without critical critical analysis appropriate information consistently
(35%). of focus. evaluation, or missing and reasoning in sources with and precise evident
Detailed
some significant some areas. some critical application to across the
discussion on
the tasks Task are not items. awareness of the case. discussions.
involved and properly Evidence of their status and Critical The tasks
critical addressed. Evidence of a general critical evaluation relevance. reasoning is have
awareness critical stance. in some areas, evident while exemplary
Limited Evidence of limited although some Very good discussion of discussion
evidence of critical evaluation in material not application of all the tasks. and detailed
critical some areas, with evaluated. the information narration.
evaluation of some lost to the case. Evidence of
material. opportunities or There is thorough
misunderstandings. evidence for in- critical
Poor analysis of depth analysis appreciation
information. of data. and
Although there However, all evaluation of
is evidence for tasks are not relevant
some consistent in theory and
discussion, they analysis and research and
are discrete can be a systematic
5
 and lacking presented in a and creative
focus. It does better manner. attempt to
not reflect relate it to
critical Evidence of the topic
application of good critical
the concepts to appreciation
the case. and evaluation
of relevant
theory and
research and a
systematic
attempt to
relate it to the
topic
4 Presentation 15 The report is The assignment Though discussion of Evidence for a The report is The report is The structure
and structure unorganized to the has the ideas is clear, a coherent well organized. well is exemplary.
(15%) point of being virtually unacceptable coherent flow of presentation is There is organized Execution is
unreadable. failings in thought is not evident, but lacks orderliness in with a excellent.
Clear
structuring evident. uniformity the structure. cohesive Discussions
introduction,
logical Lacks cohesion and and / or clarity throughout the Coherence is discussion. are free of
structure, orderly flow. of written The report is essay. also evident but The structure grammar or
reference to expression unorganized, but can there is still of the report writing errors.
appropriate be read. Poor flow of The report is scope for is excellent. A clear layout
theoretical The report is the report structure. somewhat improvement. augments the
background, difficult to read organized. The An presentation.
illustrations, due to The assignment has flow is not A generally assignment
good use of overwhelming failings in structuring coherent and well-structured whose clear Excellent
the limited
errors or and / or clarity of needs and expressed structure and overall
number of
words misspellings written expression, improvement. assignment, expression organisation
allowed, clear which impair its that significantly of the report.
layout, overall capacity to While the communicate enhances its
organisation communicate. assignment has clearly. argument
of the report. some failings in
Frequent structuring and / Well executed. Reads easily.
compositional errors or clarity of Few grammar Is well
or misspellings, but written or writing organized
the report can be expression, these errors. Reads
read do not impair its easily.  Is fairly
capacity to well organized
communicate.

More than
occasional errors

6
 or misspellings.
5 References 10% The references do not The references The report shows The report The report The report Accurate use
(10%) clearly comply with the do not clearly some compliance to demonstrates a demonstrates a demonstrates of Harvard
basic requirements of comply with HARVARD STYLE basic level of solid excellent Referencing
HARVARD STYLE format. the basic referencing, but HARVARD STYLE understanding HARVARD style.
requirements shows many errors. referencing, but of the basic STYLE
of HARVARD still contains elements of formatting Student
STYLE format. Very few references major HARVARD skills. In-text recognizes
The references quoted which are deficiencies. No STYLE citations are the concept
are inadequate inconsistent with the sophistication is formatting. In- presented at of intellectual
to support the amount of literature evident i.e. text citations if relevant property, can
literature used used in the report. Websites do not presented at areas. defend him /
in the report. follow Harvard relevant areas herself if
Some sources of Referencing style. will lend more Consistent challenged,
Sources used information are appropriatenes use of and can
show limited relevant while others Majority of the s to the report. relevant and properly
relevance and are dated. sources are current incorporate
currency. relevant and Sources used to sources that the ideas /
current. support the enhance the published
discussions are discussions. works of
relevant and others into
current. their own
work building
upon them.

Skillful use of
credible,
relevant and
current
sources of
information
that
augments
quality of
discussion.

7
Artefact
Sub Standard /
Poor Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Outstanding
Criteria No Attempt
(0 Marks) (20 Marks) (40 Marks) (50 Marks) (60 Marks) (70 Marks) (100 Marks)
Outstanding
Good work on the Very good work on Excellent work on work on the
Satisfactory work chosen business the chosen business the chosen chosen business
Completeness Poor work on the on the chosen function covering function covering business function function covering
(40%) Not chosen business business function few of the most of the covering all the all the steps in a
attempted/Very function without covering some of important the important the steps steps in a proper proper sequence.
poor. covering the the important the steps in a proper in a proper sequence. Few No details are
important the steps. steps. sequence. sequence. details are left out. left out.
Outstanding
Good work Excellent work work providing
Detailed Steps Not providing some Very good work providing detailed detailed steps
(30%) attempted/Very Poor work with Satisfactory work detailed steps for providing detailed steps with with explanation.
poor. missing important providing few many with brief steps for many with explanation. Few No details are
steps. detailed steps explanation. some explanation. . details are left out. left out.

Outstanding
Not Poor work in Satisfactory work Good work in Very good work in Excellent work in work in providing
Accuracy (30%) attempted/Very providing no in providing few providing accurate providing accurate providing accurate accurate details.
poor. accurate details for accurate details details for some of details for most of details. Few details No details are
the steps. for the steps. the steps. the steps. are left out. left out.